7.13 Constipation
1 It is important to understand the physiology and development of gut transit to recognise the normal (often regarded as abnormal).
5 Issues to be addressed include:
Introduction
Management varies according to age and whether constipation is acute or chronic. The emergency department (ED) is a difficult place from which to manage constipation, especially chronic constipation, for success requires ongoing maintenance therapy and contact with a committed and interested clinician. This is best achieved through the child’s local doctor, with input from a sympathetic paediatrician in difficult cases if deemed appropriate.1,2
Management basics
Be interested. The patient has often been pushed from pillar to post, with a quick fix, and reviewed in 3 months. Recognise that the parents and the patient have a concern, which can be the cause of major family dysfunction.
Endeavour to treat from the top, orally, rather than continue to direct attention to the rectum and anus with suppositories and enemas. The exception is when a fissure needs managing with ointment or Xylocaine ointment if defecation can be anticipated.
Develop a pharmacological armamentarium of stool softeners or osmotic aperients. Stimulants (e.g. senna) may cause abdominal discomfort with colic in infants.
Be aware that ongoing management by a single interested clinician is desirable as the constipation will often relapse, and gains are often small (three steps forward, two steps back).
This makes constipation difficult to manage in EDs. Such departments need to have appropriate and willing referral resources. Outpatient appointments rarely work for the same reasons – difficulties with continuity of care and the ability to be seen relatively urgently (albeit that encouragement with management, behavioural modification and aperient dose titration is often all that is necessary and can often be done by phone by the interested clinician).
The significant risk of relapse dictates that a period of maintenance therapy is necessary before weaning off medications. It might be appropriate to let the patient and family know that if it has taken 2 years to arrive at this stage it is highly likely it will take 2 years or so to regain the rectum’s natural motility and sensitivity.Management
Exclude physical treatable causes with careful history, examination and investigations as warranted.
Allow the enlarged rectum/colon to re-establish its own inherent physiological bowel pattern and tone and to regain its normal sensation.• Acknowledging the need for patience, determination and resolution as the most chronic cases will take years to resolve.
• Stool lubricants, paraffin oil, the taste of which has been well masked in Australia by Parachoc, using a nocturnal dose starting at 10 mL and titrating dose according to response (not recommended less than 1 year old due to possible aspiration pneumonia).
• Osmotic laxative, lactulose or sorbitol, initially 3 mL kg−1 noct. as a 70% solution, titrating dose according to response.
• Stimulants, senna starting at 2.5 mL noct. titrating dose according to response (side effects are possible colic, and if used in combination with a lubricant it may just make the faecolith spin around).
• Good results have been achieved using sachets (according to the directions) of Macrogol 3350 which is available in several palatable commercial presentations. The Macrogol 3350 induces a laxative effect by osmosis, is virtually unchanged and unabsorbed in the gut and has no known pharmacological activity. Electrolytes are present in the formulation, realising virtually no net loss of sodium, potassium or water.
• Phosphate enemas (these should be avoided in children less than 2 years old; persistent use may cause hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia and tetany).
Disimpaction of an obstinate rectal faecolith may require:
• Polyethylene glycol – electrolyte solution lavage, 25 mL kg−1 hr−1 (to 1000 mL hr−1 by nasogastric tube); causing nausea, bloating, cramps, aspiration pneumonia. This will require the child to be admitted to hospital.
• There is no evidence-based medicine to suggest the success or otherwise of anal dilatation (Lord’s procedure), and some consider permanent external sphincter damage may occur.



