Congenital Anomalies of the Thoracic Great Arteries

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1763 times

Chapter 77

Congenital Anomalies of the Thoracic Great Arteries

This chapter covers congenital anomalies of the aorta and the pulmonary arteries, with an emphasis on anomalies that produce clinical symptoms of airway and esophageal obstructions. Anomalies of the thoracic great arteries can be broadly classified into anomalous origins, anomalous connections, obstructions, and structural anomalies of the aortic arch. Important clinical entities under each category are listed in Box 77-1. This chapter will focus on structural anomalies of the aortic arch and pulmonary sling.

Vascular Rings

Overview: Anomalies of the aortic arch and the cervical vessels are relatively common, with a prevalence estimated at 0.5% to 3%, depending on the inclusion criteria. Most variations, such as a left aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery, common origin of the left common carotid and right innominate arteries (bovine arch), and ectopic origin of the left vertebral artery from the aortic arch, are of little or no clinical consequence.

“Vascular ring” is a term that refers to encirclement of the trachea and esophagus caused by the abnormal embryologic development of the aortic arch. The principal structural components responsible for this encirclement are derived from the aortic arch or arches, subclavian artery, circumflex aortic segment, ductus arteriosus, or ligamentum arteriosum. Structural anomalies of the aortic arch can be understood as the abnormal divisions in the totipotential arch, a theoretical construct proposed by Jesse Edwards (Fig. 77-1).1 Only a small subset of aortic arch developmental anomalies leads to vascular rings, accounting for less than 1% of all congenital cardiovascular defects. Although about a dozen different types of vascular rings exist, double aortic arches and right aortic arch with left ligamentum arteriosum account for 90% of cases.2

Chromosome 22q11 deletion has been reported in 24% of patients with isolated arch anomalies.3,4 This deletion was first identified in persons with DiGeorge syndrome, which consists of various degrees of immunodeficiency, thymic hypoplasia or aplasia, hypoparathyroidism, outflow tract cardiac defects, and dysmorphic appearance. Chromosome 22q11 deletion is now recognized as a major factor in many congenital heart defects. For example, it is detected in up to 50% of patients born with interrupted aortic arch or truncus arteriosus. Testing for this chromosomal abnormality can be performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Clinical Manifestations: The severity of symptoms and the age of onset depend on the extent of the compression about the esophagus and trachea.5 Because different ring arrangements have different constrictive effects, not all vascular rings produce the same degree of symptoms; in fact, some rings produce no symptoms. Conversely, symptomatic vascular compression of the trachea and esophagus does not require a complete ring, as can be seen in an anomalously placed or aneurysmal innominate artery or a retroesophageal subclavian artery. Most cases of vascular ring, if they are symptomatic, present during infancy or early childhood.

Clinical symptoms related to constriction of the trachea include stridor, exertional dyspnea, cyanosis, respiratory distress, reflex apnea, and chronic cough. In cases of severe obstruction, intercostal retractions and lung hyperinflation can occur. Some patients have a history of recurrent respiratory infections. The pathophysiology involves external vascular compression, which leads directly to a reduced luminal cross-sectional area, as well as cartilage breakdown, tracheomalacia, and stenosis as a result of chronic, pulsatile mechanical compression. Clinical symptoms related to constriction of the esophagus are dysphagia, recurrent vomiting, difficulty feeding, and failure to thrive. Because the trachea and esophagus share the same space within the ring, respiratory symptoms can worsen during feedings. Of the different types of rings, double aortic arches produce the most severe symptoms. It is not uncommon for infants and children with vascular rings to be misdiagnosed with reactive airway disease.

Imaging: Chest radiography may show tracheal compression by a vascular ring, but by itself a chest radiograph cannot confirm or exclude a vascular ring. Because a vascular ring is more likely in the presence of a right aortic arch, symptoms of tracheal compression in the presence of a right aortic arch should raise the possibility of a vascular ring.

In patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms, barium esophagography is a useful first test.6 A normal barium esophagram usually excludes a clinically significant vascular ring. Classic S-shaped indentations in the frontal projection of an esophagram are highly suggestive of double aortic arches. A posterior vascular indentation may or may not be a vascular ring but is more likely in the presence of a right aortic arch. An esophagram may reveal other causes of a patient’s symptoms, such as gastroesophageal reflux, aspiration, or tracheoesophageal fistula.

Mediastinal ultrasonography or echocardiography with gray scale and color Doppler imaging may visualize the vascular ring directly in neonates and infants because these patients have excellent sonographic windows.7 Echocardiography generally is not useful in older children or adolescents. Moreover, because ultrasound is primarily a two-dimensional imaging method, connecting tortuous vascular structures can be difficult, especially when ligamentous or interrupted vascular segments are present. The presence of a vascular ring has been diagnosed successfully in utero with fetal ultrasonography.8

Patients with severe symptoms or an abnormal results of an esophagram, chest radiograph, or mediastinal ultrasonography should undergo angiography to confirm the vascular abnormalities and to gather information for surgical planning. Conventional catheter angiography has been replaced by first-pass, contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Both modalities can visualize the aortic arch and the cervical arteries well. MRA is usually preferred because it does not subject the patient to ionizing radiation.9,10 However, in cases in which the airways and the lungs must be evaluated together with the vascular anomaly, CTA can accomplish both in a single scan and may be a better choice.

Treatment: The definitive treatment is surgical relief of the obstruction.11 A double aortic arch is repaired by dividing the nondominant arch between its last cervical artery and the point where the nondominant arch joins the descending aorta. If the ductus arteriosus or the ligamentum arteriosum forms a border of the ring, it is ligated to relieve the constriction. A thoracotomy is performed at the side of the planned ligation. Persistent stenosis or tracheomalacia may develop in the constricted trachea, requiring additional repair.

Anatomic, clinical, and imaging considerations for specific aortic arch anomalies are discussed in the following section.

Special Considerations

Double Aortic Arches

Double aortic arches can be categorized as bilaterally patent or as atretic in a portion of one of the two arches, usually the left. Bilaterally patent or complete double aortic arches represent persistence of both the right and the left embryologic fourth aortic arches. Two vessels arise from the ascending aorta and course dorsally, one on each side of the trachea and esophagus, to join posteriorly in a left descending aorta in 80% of cases. In this arrangement, the left arch is usually anterior and the right arch is posterior. In 20% of cases, the descending aorta lies on the right and the posterior-anterior relationship of the double aortic arches is reversed. The larger aortic arch is the dominant arch, and in 73% of cases, the right arch is dominant. The right arch normally is situated higher than the left arch, as can be seen in a typical esophagram, where the right arch indents the esophagus higher than does the left arch (Fig. 77-2). Double aortic arches usually are found without associated cardiac anomalies.

Double aortic arches with left arch atresia develop from regression of varying segments of the left aortic arch, with fibrous continuity of the segments completing the vascular ring.12 The atretic segment may lie between the left subclavian artery and the descending aorta (Fig. 77-3) or between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. The former configuration is similar to a right aortic arch with a mirror-image branching pattern, and the latter configuration is similar to a right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery. An aortic diverticulum may be present posterior to the esophagus, which is part of the distal left aortic arch, before connecting to the aberrant left subclavian artery. Double aortic arches with right arch atresia are theoretically possible but extremely rare, with very few reported cases. The clinical presentation, imaging approach, and surgical treatment are no different from those for other types of double aortic arches.

It may not be possible to distinguish double aortic arches with or without left arch atresia with an esophagram or chest radiograph. With ultrasonography, no Doppler flow is present in the atretic arch. CTA and MRA can readily visualize the atretic segment that appears to tether adjacent vascular structures and identify an aortic diverticulum.

Right Aortic Arch with Aberrant Left Subclavian Artery

A right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery is a common cause of a vascular ring. The distal portion of the rudimentary left arch may persist as a diverticulum of Kommerell, giving origin to the left subclavian artery. Unlike double aortic arches with left arch atresia, no fibrous connection is present between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery. Instead, the left border of the ring is completed by the left ligamentum arteriosum, which extends from the left subclavian artery to the pulmonary artery (Fig. 77-4). In 10% of cases, the ligamentum arteriosum is on the right side, and thus there would be no vascular ring. Unlike double aortic arches, this vascular ring typically is loose, and many patients are asymptomatic or present with mild symptoms later in life.

Right Aortic Arch with Circumflex Aorta

Unlike the typical right aortic arch, in which the descending aorta is right sided, a circumflex aorta descends on the left. To do so, the distal aortic arch travels from right to left, posterior to the esophagus, before turning downward (Fig. 77-5). A left ligamentum arteriosum connects the pulmonary artery to the descending aorta, completing the ring. The cervical branching can have a mirror-image pattern or an aberrant left subclavian artery. Neither type affects the formation of the ring. An aberrant left subclavian artery frequently arises from an aortic diverticulum with stenosis at its origin.

Right Cervical Aortic Arch

A right cervical aortic arch occurs when abnormal cephalic migration of the aortic arch into the supraclavicular and neck region occurs. Embryologically, the cervical aortic arch forms from the third arch rather than the normal fourth arch. A cervical arch is more common on the right than on the left. The cervical branching pattern varies, and separate origins of the internal and external carotid arteries may arise from the cervical aortic arch. Disturbance of the carotid arteries can be anticipated, because they also are derived from the third arch. The right cervical aortic arch can give rise to a vascular ring in a manner similar to the other types of right aortic arch. Clinically, a pulsatile mass may be present in the supraclavicular region. Radiographic findings include right superior mediastinal widening, tracheal displacement to the left and anteriorly, a large oblique impression on the esophagram from cephalic right to caudal left, and a left descending aorta (Fig. 77-6).

Left Aortic Arch with Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery

Compared with a right aortic arch, vascular ring formation in a left aortic arch is rare (Fig. 77-7) because the ductus arteriosus and ligamentum arteriosum usually are left-sided. To complete a ring with a left aortic arch would require a right ductus arteriosus. In the specific case of a left aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery, very few proven cases of vascular ring have been reported. Although it is not part of a vascular ring, a large diverticulum of Kommerell at the retroesophageal right subclavian artery could cause difficulty swallowing; this association has been termed “dysphagia lusoria.” This association is hard to prove, however, because although aberrant right subclavian artery is common, occurring in about 0.5% of the population, few persons experience symptoms.

Pulmonary Artery Sling

Overview: A pulmonary artery sling (PAS) is a rare congenital anomaly of the pulmonary artery that produces obstructive symptoms of the upper airway. In a person with normal anatomy, the left main pulmonary artery branches off the pulmonary trunk in a shallow turn toward the left at a level slightly above the right main pulmonary artery. It then courses above the left main bronchus. In a person with a PAS, the left main pulmonary artery originates from the posterior aspect of the right pulmonary artery. It turns left behind the trachea at or near the level of the carina toward the left pulmonary hilum. The trachea is compressed between the left and right main pulmonary arteries (Fig. 77-8). The esophagus courses posterior to both pulmonary arteries and is not obstructed, unlike the situation in a person with a vascular ring.

The incidence of PAS is not known. In a large-scale screening study of more than 180,000 school-aged children with ultrasonography, 11 cases were found,15 representing an in incidence of 1 in 17,000. A slight male predilection was noted. Patients present with clinical symptoms in childhood, and 90% of patients present with symptoms before the first year of life.16 Nonspecific respiratory symptoms include an asthmatic cough and acute and recurrent bronchopulmonary infections. Some patients are misdiagnosed with asthma for many years before PAS is discovered. Symptom severity depends on the degree of airway compression and coexisting airway abnormalities. Long-standing compression of the airways also may cause tracheobronchomalacia. Unlike with a vascular ring, the obstructive symptoms of the esophagus tend to be mild or absent in persons with a PAS.

Coexisting airway abnormalities are present in more than 50% of patients, including abnormal branching of the airways, complete tracheal rings, and tracheal stenosis.17 The vertical position of the left pulmonary artery origin, along with the branching pattern of the airways, has been used to classify PAS.18 In type 1 PAS, the left pulmonary artery originates at T4-T5 vertebral levels, just above the normal level of the carina. Subtype 1A has normal branching pattern of the airways; subtype 1B has a tracheal bronchus. In type 2 PAS, the left pulmonary artery originates below the T5 vertebral level, below the normal carina. Subtype 2A has a right main bronchus connecting to the right upper lobe only. A separate “bridging” airway arises from the left main bronchus, below the aberrant left pulmonary artery, that supplies the right middle and right lower lobes (Fig. 77-9, A). In subtype 2B, the right main bronchus is absent and the bridging airway defined in 2A supplies the entire right lung. Except for the level of the left pulmonary artery, the right main bronchus in type 2A superficially resembles the tracheal bronchus in type 1B. Regardless of the type, complete tracheal rings and stenosis frequently are present (Fig. 77-9, B).

About a third of PAS cases are associated with other cardiovascular anomalies, including ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, tetralogy of Fallot, common ventricle, and coarctation.16 Genetic associations include trisomies 18 and 21.19

Imaging: As the left pulmonary artery wraps around the right side of the trachea, the right main bronchus or the bridging airway can be obstructed. In the newborn, this phenomenon may manifest as retained fluid in the right lung. In older children, this phenomenon may present as a hyperinflated right lung from air trapping. The most specific finding is the abnormal architecture of the central airways, often described as a low carina and an inverted T shape of the central airways (see Fig. 77-9, A). This finding is a result of the abnormal airway structure found in type 2 PAS. The apparent low carina is the result of the low origin of the bridging bronchus. The horizontal course of the bridging bronchus gives the carina a flattened look, hence the inverted T shape.

Barium esophagography is a useful screening tool for PAS. The esophagus is indented anteriorly at the level of the carina (Fig. 77-10), unlike the posterior indentation seen with a vascular ring. In addition, on the lateral projection, the trachea is separated from the esophagus by the left main pulmonary artery.

Direct visualization of the anomalous left pulmonary artery can be performed with CTA or MRA.20 Because assessment of the airways and the lungs is important for PAS, CTA is the preferred imaging modality. CTA images can be postprocessed to provide virtual endoscopic views to evaluate for focal stenosis, extrinsic vascular compression, and a tracheal ring (see Fig. 77-9, B). Endoscopic bronchoscopy is recommended to evaluate dynamic airway obstruction from tracheobronchomalacia and to confirm the extent of complete tracheal rings or stenosis for surgical planning.

Treatment: The definite treatment is surgical reimplantation or relocation of the left pulmonary artery and release of the entrapped trachea. In many of these patients, stenosis of the trachea requires a sliding tracheoplasty or pericardial patch to augment the narrowed segment. A diameter of the trachea that is less than 3 mm is associated with the need for tracheoplasty or a poor outcome.21 Airway narrowing that involves the carina or the bronchi is particularly difficult to repair.22

References

1. Development of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems. In Standring S, ed.: Gray’s anatomy, 39th ed, Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2005.

2. Bonnard, A, Auber, F, Fourcade, L, et al. Vascular ring abnormalities: a retrospective study of 62 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:539–543.

3. McElhinney, DB, Clark, BJ, III., Weinberg, PM, et al. Association of chromosome 22q11 deletion with isolated anomalies of aortic arch laterality and branching. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2114–2119.

4. Momma, K, Matsuoka, R, Takao, A. Aortic arch anomalies associated with chromosome 22q11 deletion (CATCH 22). Pediatr Cardiol. 1999;20:97–102.

5. Woods, RK, Sharp, RJ, Holcomb, GW, et al. Vascular anomalies and tracheoesophageal compression: a single institution’s 25-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:434–439.

6. Hernanz-Schulman, M. Vascular rings: a practical approach to imaging diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:961–979.

7. Murdison, KA. Ultrasonic imaging of vascular rings and other anomalies causing tracheobronchial compression. Echocardiography. 1996;13:337–356.

8. Patel, CR, Lane, JR, Spector, ML, et al. Fetal echocardiographic diagnosis of vascular rings. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:251–257.

9. Malik, TH, Bruce, IA, Kaushik, V, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of suspected extrinsic tracheobronchial compression due to vascular anomalies. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:52–55.

10. Oddone, M, Granata, C, Vercellino, N, et al. Multi-modality evaluation of the abnormalities of the aortic arches in children: techniques and imaging spectrum with emphasis on MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:947–960.

11. Chun, K, Colombani, PM, Dudgeon, DL, et al. Diagnosis and management of congenital vascular rings: a 22-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:597–602.

12. Holmes, KW, Bluemke, DA, Vricella, LA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of a distorted left subclavian artery course: an important clue to an unusual type of double aortic arch. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27:316–320.

13. Zachary, CH, Myers, JL, Eggli, KD. Vascular ring due to right aortic arch with mirror-image branching and left ligamentum arteriosus: complete preoperative diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol. 2001;22:71–73.

14. McLeary, MS, Frye, LL, Young, LW. Magnetic resonance imaging of a left circumflex aortic arch and aberrant right subclavian artery: the other vascular ring. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:263–265.

15. Yu, JM, Liao, CP, Ge, S, et al. The prevalence and clinical impact of pulmonary sling on school-aged children: a large-scale screening study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008;43:656–661.

16. Gikonyo, BM, Jue, KL, Edwards, JE. Pulmonary vascular sling: report of seven cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Cardiol. 1989;10:81–89.

17. Berdon, WE, Baker, DH, Wung, JT, et al. Complete cartilage-ring tracheal stenosis associated with anomalous left pulmonary artery: the ring-sling complex. Radiology. 1984;152:57–64.

18. Wells, TR, Gwinn, JL, Landing, BH, et al. Reconsideration of the anatomy of sling left pulmonary artery: the association of one form with bridging bronchus and imperforate anus. Anatomic and diagnostic aspects. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23:892–898.

19. Newman, B, Cho, Y. Left pulmonary artery sling-anatomy and imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31:158–170.

20. Hodina, M, Wicky, S, Payot, M, et al. Non-invasive imaging of the ring-sling complex in children. Pediatr Cardiol. 2001;22:333–337.

21. Huang, SC, Wu, ET, Wang, CC, et al. Surgical management of pulmonary artery sling: trachea diameter and outcomes with or without tracheoplasty [published online ahead of print March 13, 2012]. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47:903–908.

22. Oshima, Y, Yamaguchi, M, Yoshimura, N, et al. Management of pulmonary artery sling associated with tracheal stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;56:1334–1338.