Congenital Abnormalities and Dysmorphic Syndromes

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 6120 times

CHAPTER 16 Congenital Abnormalities and Dysmorphic Syndromes

The formation of a human being, a process sometimes known as morphogenesis, involves extremely complicated cell biology that, though only partially understood, is beginning to yield its mysteries (see Chapter 6). Given the complexity, it is not surprising that on occasion it goes wrong. Nor is it surprising that in many congenital abnormalities genetic factors can clearly be implicated. Approximately 2400 dysmorphic syndromes are described that are thought to be due to molecular pathology in single genes, and for at least 500 the genes have been identified and more than 200 mapped. A further 500 or so sporadically occurring syndromes are recognized, for which the precise cause remains elusive. In this chapter, we shall consider the overall impact of abnormalities in morphogenesis by reviewing the following.

Incidence

Newborn Infants

Surveys reviewing the incidence of both major and minor anomalies in newborn infants have been undertaken in many parts of the world. A major anomaly can be defined as one that has an adverse outcome on either the function or the social acceptability of the individual (Table 16.1). In contrast, minor abnormalities are of neither medical nor cosmetic importance (Box 16.1). However, the division between major and minor abnormalities is not always straightforward; for instance, an inguinal hernia occasionally leads to strangulation of bowel and always requires surgical correction, so there is a risk of serious sequelae.

Table 16.1 Examples of Major Congenital Structural Abnormalities

System and Abnormality Incidence per 1000 Births
Cardiovascular 10
Ventricular septal defect 2.5
Atrial septal defect 1
Patent ductus arteriosus 1
Tetralogy of Fallot 1
Central nervous system 10
Anencephaly 1
Hydrocephaly 1
Microcephaly 1
Lumbosacral spina bifida 2
Gastrointestinal 4
Cleft lip/palate 1.5
Diaphragmatic hernia 0.5
Esophageal atresia 0.3
Imperforate anus 0.2
Limb 2
Transverse amputation 0.2
Urogenital 4
Bilateral renal agenesis 2
Polycystic kidneys (infantile) 0.02
Bladder exstrophy 0.03

These surveys have consistently shown that 2% to 3% of all newborns have at least one major abnormality apparent at birth. The true incidence, taking into account abnormalities that present later in life, such as brain malformations, is probably close to 5%. Minor abnormalities are found in approximately 10% of all newborns. If two or more minor abnormalities are present in a newborn, there is a 10% to 20% risk that the baby will also have a major malformation.

The long-term outlook for a baby with a major abnormality obviously depends on the nature of the specific birth defect and whether it can be treated. The overall prognosis for this group of newborns is relatively poor, with 25% dying in early infancy, 25% having subsequent mental or physical disability, and the remaining 50% having a fair or good outlook after treatment.

Childhood Mortality

Congenital abnormalities make a significant contribution to mortality throughout childhood. During infancy, approximately 25% of all deaths are the result of major structural abnormalities, falling to 20% between 1 to 10 years of age, and to ∼7.5% between 10 to 15 years.

Collating the incidence data on abnormalities noted in early spontaneous miscarriages and newborns, at least 15% of all recognized human conceptions are structurally abnormal (Table 16.2), and genetic factors are probably implicated in at least 50% of these.

Table 16.2 Incidence of Structural Abnormalities

Incidence (%)
Spontaneous Miscarriages
First trimester 80–85
Second trimester 25
All Babies
Major abnormality apparent at birth 2–3
Major abnormality apparent later 2
Minor abnormality 10
Death in perinatal period 25
Death in first year of life 25
Death at 1–9 years 20
Death at 10–14 years 7.5

Definition and Classification of Birth Defects

So far in this chapter the terms congenital abnormality and birth defect have been used in a general sense to describe all types of structural abnormality that can occur in an embryo, fetus, or newborn infant. Although these terms are perfectly acceptable for the purpose of lumping together all these abnormalities when studying their overall incidence, they do not provide any insight into possible underlying mechanisms. More specific definitions have been devised that have the added advantage of providing a combined clinical and etiological classification.

Single Abnormalities

Single abnormalities may have a genetic or non-genetic basis. The system of terms used helps us to understand the different mechanisms that might be implicated, and these can be illustrated in schematic form (Figure 16.1).

Disruption

The term disruption refers to an abnormal structure of an organ or tissue as a result of external factors disturbing the normal developmental process. This used to be known as a secondary or extrinsic malformation, and includes ischemia, infection, and trauma. An example of a disruption is the effect seen on limb development when a strand or band of amnion becomes entwined around a baby’s forearm or digits (Figure 16.3). By definition a disruption is not genetic, although occasionally genetic factors can predispose to disruptive events. For example, a small proportion of amniotic bands are caused by an underlying genetically determined defect in collagen that weakens the amnion, making it more liable to tear or rupture spontaneously.

Deformation

A deformation is a defect resulting from an abnormal mechanical force that distorts an otherwise normal structure. Examples include dislocation of the hip and mild ‘positional’ talipes (‘clubfoot’) (Figure 16.4) resulting from reduced amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios) or intrauterine crowding from twinning or a structurally abnormal uterus. Deformations usually occur late in pregnancy and convey a good prognosis with appropriate treatment—for instance, gentle splinting for talipes, because the underlying organ is fundamentally normal in structure.

Multiple Abnormalities

Genetic Causes of Malformations

There are many recognized causes of congenital abnormality, although it is notable that in up to 50% of all cases no clear explanation can be established (Table 16.3).

Table 16.3 Causes of Congenital Abnormalities

Cause %
Genetic 30–40
Chromosomal 6
Single gene 7.5
Multifactorial 20–30
Environmental 5–10
Drugs and chemicals 2
Infections 2
Maternal illness 2
Physical agents 1
Unknown 50
Total 100

Chromosome Abnormalities

These account for approximately 6% of all recognized congenital abnormalities. As a general rule, any perceptible degree of autosomal imbalance, such as duplication, deletion, trisomy, or monosomy, will result in severe structural and developmental abnormality, which may lead to early miscarriage. Common chromosome syndromes are described in Chapter 18. It is not known whether malformations caused by a significant chromosome abnormality, such as a trisomy, are the result of dosage effects of the individual genes involved (‘additive’ model) or general developmental instability caused by a large number of abnormal developmental gene products (‘interactive’ model).

Single-Gene Defects

These account for 7% to 8% of all congenital abnormalities. Some of these are isolated—i.e., they involve only one organ or system (Table 16.4). Other single-gene defects result in multiple congenital abnormality syndromes involving many organs or systems that do not have any obvious underlying embryological relationship. For example, ectrodactyly (Figure 16.10) in isolation can be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait, occasionally autosomal recessive, and rarely X-linked. It can also occur as one manifestation of the EEC syndrome (ectodermal dysplasia, ectrodactyly and cleft lip/palate), which follows autosomal dominant inheritance. Therefore different mutations, allelic or non-allelic, can cause similar or identical malformations.

Table 16.4 Congenital Abnormalities that can be Caused by Single-Gene Defects

  Inheritance Abnormalities
Isolated
central nervous system
Hydrocephalus XR  
Megalencephaly AD  
Microcephaly AD/AR  
ocular
Aniridia AD  
Cataracts AD/AR  
Microphthalmia AD/AR  
limb
Brachydactyly AD  
Ectrodactyly AD/AR/XR  
Polydactyly AD  
other
Infantile polycystic AR kidneys  
Syndromes
Apert AD Craniosynostosis, syndactyly
EEC AD Ectodermal dysplasia, ectrodactyly, cleft lip/palate
Meckel AR Encephalocele, polydactyly, polycystic kidneys
Roberts AR Cleft lip/palate, phocomelia
Van der Woude AD Cleft lip/palate, lip pits

AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; XR, X-linked recessive.

The importance of determining a single-gene basis for birth defects lies in the need for accurate genetic counseling for the immediate and wider family. In addition, from a research perspective single gene causes can provide clues to susceptibility loci for similar malformations and phenotypes that appear to show multifactorial inheritance.

From the many examples of progress in identifying the genes that cause congenital abnormalities and dysmorphic syndromes, two are now illustrated from the field of pediatric genetics. In both the gene function in relation to widespread expression in many tissues has yet to be determined.

Noonan Syndrome

First described by Noonan and Ehmke in 1963, this well-known condition has incidence that may be as high as 1 : 2000 births, with equal sex ratio. The features resemble those of Turner syndrome in females—short stature, neck webbing, increased carrying angle at the elbow and congenital heart disease. Pulmonary stenosis is the most common lesion but atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and occasionally hypertrophic cardiomyopathy occur. A characteristic mild pectus deformity may be seen, and the face shows hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, and low-set ears (Figure 16.11). Some patients have a mild bleeding diathesis, and learning difficulties occur in about one-quarter.

In a three-generation Dutch family, Noonan syndrome (NS) was mapped to 12q22 in 1994, but it was not until 2001 that mutations were identified in the protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor-type, 11 (PTPN11) gene. Attention has turned rapidly to phenotype–genotype correlation, and mutation-positive cases have a much higher frequency of pulmonary stenosis than mutation-negative cases, and very few mutations have been found in patients with cardiomyopathy. However, facial features are similar, whether or not a mutation is found. Mutations in PTPN11 account for about half of all cases of NS. Mutations in the SOS1, SHOC2, KRAS, and MAPZK1 genes have been found in a small proportion of PTPN11-negative cases. These genes belong to the same pathway, known as RAS-MAPK. The protein product of PTPN11 is SHP-2 and this, together with SOS1, positively transduces signals to Ras-GTP, a downstream effector (Figure 16.12). The KRAS mutations in NS appear to lead to K-ras proteins with impaired responsiveness to GTPase activating proteins (p. 213). Neurofibromatosis, the most common of this group, is dealt with in Chapter 18 (p. 298).

image

FIGURE 16.12 The RAS-MAPK pathway. HRAS and KRAS are activated by SPH-2 and SOS1 (red arrows). Orange arrows = inhibition. The pathway is dysregulated by mutations in key components, resulting in the distinct but related phenotypes of Noonan syndrome, CFC syndrome, Costello syndrome, and neurofibromatosis (see Table 16.5). Neurofibromin is a GAP (GTPase activating) protein that functions as a tumor-suppressor. Mutant RAS proteins display impaired GTPase activity and are resistant to GAPs. The effect is for RAS to bind GTP, which results in activation of the pathway (gain of function).

For years dysmorphologists recognized overlapping features between NS and the rarer conditions known as cardio-facio-cutaneous and Costello syndromes. These conditions are now recognized to form part of a spectrum of disorders explained by mutations in different components of the RAS-MAPK pathway, with each syndrome displaying considerable genetic heterogeneity (Table 16.5). Many of the mutations are gain-of-function missense mutations, which may explain the increase in solid tumors in Costello syndrome as well as cellular proliferation in some tissues in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome (e.g., hyperkeratosis). The effect is for RAS to bind GTP, which results in activation of the pathway (gain-of-function). Neurofibromin is a GTPase activating protein, and functions as a tumor-suppressor.

Sotos Syndrome

First described in 1964, this is one of the ‘overgrowth’ syndromes, previously known as cerebral gigantism. Birth weight is usually increased and macrocephaly noted. Early feeding difficulties and hypotonia may prompt many investigations and there is often motor delay and ataxia. Height progresses along the top of, or above, the normal centile lines, but final adult height is not necessarily markedly increased. Advanced bone age may be present, as well as large hands and feet, and the cerebral ventricles may be mildly dilated on imaging. The face is characteristic (Figure 16.13), with a high prominent forehead, hypertelorism with down-slanting palpebral fissures, a characteristic nose in early childhood, and a long pointed chin. Scoliosis develops in some cases during adolescence. Parent–child transmission is rare, probably because most patients have learning difficulties. However, the author has seen a three-generation family including individuals with above average intelligence.

Among patients with Sotos syndrome reported to have balanced chromosome translocations were two with breakpoints at 5q35. From these crucial patients a Japanese group in 2002 went on to identify a 2.2-Mb deletion in a series of Sotos syndrome cases. The deletion takes out a gene called NSD1, an androgen receptor-associated co-regulator with 23 exons. The Japanese found a small number of frameshift mutations in their patients but, interestingly, a study of European cases found that mutations were far more common than deletions. For the large majority of cases the mutations and deletions occur de novo.

Multifactorial Inheritance

This accounts for the majority of congenital abnormalities in which genetic factors can clearly be implicated. These include most isolated (‘non-syndromal’) malformations involving the heart, central nervous system, and kidneys (Box 16.2). For many of these conditions, empirical risks have been derived (p. 346) based on large epidemiological family studies, so that it is usually possible to provide the parents of an affected child with a clear indication of the likelihood that a future child will be similarly affected. Risks to the offspring of patients who were themselves treated successfully in childhood are becoming available. These are usually similar to the risks that apply to siblings, as would be predicted by the multifactorial model (p. 143).

Genetic Heterogeneity

It has long been recognized that specific congenital malformations can have many different causes (p. 346), hence the importance of trying to distinguish between syndromal and isolated cases. This causal diversity has become increasingly apparent as developments in molecular biology have led to the identification of highly conserved families of genes that play crucial roles in early embryogenesis.

This subject is discussed at length in Chapter 6. In the current chapter, two specific malformations, holoprosencephaly and neural tube defects, will be considered to demonstrate the rate of progress in this field and the extent of the challenge that lies ahead.

Holoprosencephaly

This severe and often fatal malformation is caused by a failure of cleavage of the embryonic forebrain or prosencephalon. Normally this divides transversely into the telencephalon and the diencephalon. The telencephalon divides in the sagittal plane to form the cerebral hemispheres and the olfactory tracts and bulbs. The diencephalon develops to form the thalamic nuclei, the pineal gland, the optic chiasm, and the optic nerves. In holoprosencephaly, there is incomplete or partial failure of these developmental processes, and in the severe alobar form this results in an abnormal facial appearance (see Figure 6.7, p. 88) with profound neurodevelopmental impairment.

Etiologically, holoprosencephaly can be classified as chromosomal, syndromal, or isolated. Chromosomal causes account for around 30% to 40% of all cases, with the most common abnormality being trisomy 13 (p. 275). Other chromosomal causes include deletions of 18p, 2p21, 7q36, and 21q22.3, duplication of 3p24-pter, duplication or deletion of 13q, and triploidy (p. 276). Syndromal causes of holoprosencephaly are numerous and include relatively well known conditions such as the deletion 22q11 (DiGeorge) syndrome (p. 282) and a host of much rarer multiple malformation syndromes, some of which show autosomal recessive inheritance. One of these, Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (p. 87), is associated with low levels of cholesterol; this is relevant in that it is known that cholesterol is necessary for normal functioning of the sonic hedgehog pathway (p. 86).

The third group, isolated holoprosencephaly, is sometimes explained by heterozygous mutations in three genes. The effects can be very variable, ranging from very mild with minimal features such as anosmia, to the full-blown, lethal, alobar form. The genes Sonic hedgehog (SHH) on chromosome 7q36, ZIC2 on chromosome 13q32, and SIX3 on chromosome 2p21. Of these SHH is thought to make the greatest contribution, accounting for up to 20% of all familial cases and between 1% and 10% of isolated cases. Some sibling recurrences of holoprosencephaly, not because of recessive Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, have been shown to be due to germline mutations in these genes.

That so many familial cases remain unexplained indicates that more holoprosencephaly genes await identification. Causal heterogeneity is further illustrated by its association with poorly controlled maternal diabetes mellitus (p. 261).

Neural Tube Defects

Neural tube defects (NTDs), such as spina bifida and anencephaly, illustrate many of the underlying principles of multifactorial inheritance and emphasize the importance of trying to identify possible adverse environmental factors. These conditions result from defective closure of the developing neural tube during the first month of embryonic life. A defect occurring at the upper end of the developing neural tube results in either exencephaly/anencephaly or an encephalocele (Figure 16.14). A defect occurring at the lower end of the developing neural tube leads to a spinal lesion such as a lumbosacral myelocele or meningomyelocele (see Figure 16.2), and a defect involving the head plus cervical and thoracic spine leads to craniorachischisis. These different entities relate to the different embryological closure points of the neural tube. Most NTDs have serious consequences. Anencephaly and craniorachischisis are not compatible with survival for more than a few hours after birth. Large lumbosacral lesions usually cause partial or complete paralysis of the lower limbs with impaired bladder and bowel continence.

As with many malformations, NTDs can be classified etiologically under the headings of chromosomal, syndromal, and isolated. Chromosomal causes include trisomy 13 and trisomy 18, in both of which NTDs show an incidence of around 5% to 10%. Syndromal causes include the relatively rare autosomal recessive disorder Meckel-Gruber syndrome, characterized by encephalocele in association with polycystic kidneys and polydactyly. However, most NTDs represent isolated malformations in otherwise normal infants, and appear to show multifactorial inheritance.

The empirical recurrence risks to first-degree relatives (siblings and offspring) vary according to the local population incidence and are as high as 4% to 5% in areas where NTDs are common. The incidence in the United Kingdom is highest in people of Celtic origin. If such individuals move from their country of origin to another part of the world, the incidence in their offspring declines but remains higher than among the indigenous population. These observations suggest a relatively high incidence of susceptibility genes in the Celtic populations.

No single NTD susceptibility genes have been identified in humans, although there is some evidence that the common 677C > T polymorphism in the Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene can be a susceptibility factor in some populations. Reduction in MTHFR activity results in decreased plasma folate levels, which are known to be causally associated with NTDs (see the following section). Research efforts have also focused on developmental genes, such as the PAX family (p. 91), which are expressed in the embryonic neural tube and vertebral column. In mouse models, about 80 genes have been linked to exencephaly, about 20 genes to lumbosacral meningomyelocele, and about 5 genes to craniorachischisis. One example is an interaction between mutations of PAX1 and the Platelet-derived growth factor α gene (PDGFRA) that results in severe NTDs in 100% of double-mutant embryos. This rare example of digenic inheritance (p. 119) serves as a useful illustration of the difficulties posed by a search for susceptibility genes in a multifactorial disorder. However, to date there have been no equivalent breakthroughs in understanding the processes in human NTDs.

Environmental factors include poor socioeconomic status, multiparity, and valproic acid embryopathy (p. 261). Firm evidence has also emerged that periconceptional multivitamin supplementation reduces the risk of recurrence by a factor of 70% to 75% when a woman has had one affected child. Several studies have shown that folic acid is likely to be the effective constituent in multivitamin preparations. In both the United Kingdom and the United States, it is recommended that all women who have had a previous child with a NTD should take 4 to 5 mg folic acid daily both before and during the early stages of all subsequent pregnancies. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, it has been recommended that all women who are trying to conceive should take 0.4 mg folic acid daily. In the United States, where bread is fortified with folic acid, this recommendation applies to all women of reproductive age throughout their reproductive years. In the United Kingdom, this recommendation has not as yet resulted in a noticeable decline in the incidence of NTDs.

Environmental Agents (Teratogens)

An agent that can cause a birth defect by interfering with normal embryonic or fetal development is known as a teratogen. Many teratogens have been identified and exhaustive tests are now undertaken before any new drug is approved for use by pregnant women. The potential effects of any particular teratogen usually depend on the dosage and timing of administration during pregnancy, along with the susceptibility of both the mother and fetus.

An agent that conveys a high risk of teratogenesis, such as the rubella virus or thalidomide, can usually be identified relatively quickly. Unfortunately, it is much more difficult to detect a low-grade teratogen that causes an abnormality in only a small proportion of cases. This is because of the relatively high background incidence of congenital abnormalities, and also because many pregnant women take medication at some time in pregnancy, often for an ill-defined ‘flulike’ illness. Despite extensive study, controversy still surrounds the use of a number of drugs in pregnancy. The anti-nausea drug Debendox was the subject of successful litigation in the United States despite a lack of firm evidence to support a definite teratogenic effect.

Drugs and Chemicals

Drugs and chemicals with a proven teratogenic effect in humans are listed in Table 16.6. These may account for approximately 2% of all congenital abnormalities.

Table 16.6 Drugs with a Proven Teratogenic Effect in Humans

Drug Effects
ACE inhibitors Renal dysplasia
Alcohol Cardiac defects, microcephaly, characteristic facies
Chloroquine Chorioretinitis, deafness
Diethylstilbestrol Uterine malformations, vaginal adenocarcinoma
Lithium Cardiac defects (Ebstein anomaly)
Phenytoin Cardiac defects, cleft palate, digital hypoplasia
Retinoids Ear and eye defects, hydrocephalus
Streptomycin Deafness
Tetracycline Dental enamel hypoplasia
Thalidomide Phocomelia, cardiac and ear abnormalities
Valproic acid Neural tube defects, clefting, limb defects, characteristic facies
Warfarin Nasal hypoplasia, stippled epiphyses

ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme.

Many other drugs have been proposed as possible teratogens, but the relatively small numbers of reported cases make it difficult to confirm that they are definitely teratogenic. This applies to many anticancer drugs, such as methotrexate and chlorambucil, and to anticonvulsants, such as sodium valproate, carbamazepine, and primidone. Exposure to environmental chemicals is also an area of widespread concern. Organic mercurials ingested in contaminated fish in Minamata, Japan, as a result of industrial pollution caused a ‘cerebral palsy-like’ syndrome in babies who had been exposed in utero. Controversy surrounds the use of agents used in warfare, such as dioxin (Agent Orange) in Vietnam and various nerve gases in the Gulf War.

The Thalidomide Tragedy

Thalidomide was used widely in Europe during 1958 to 1962 as a sedative. In 1961 an association with severe limb anomalies in babies whose mothers had taken the drug during the first trimester was recognized and the drug was subsequently withdrawn from use. It is possible that more than 10,000 babies were damaged over this period. Review of these babies’ records indicated that the critical period for fetal damage was between 20 and 35 days postconception (i.e., 34 to 50 days after the beginning of the last menstrual period).

The most characteristic abnormality caused by thalidomide was phocomelia (Figure 16.15). This is the name given to a limb that is malformed due to absence of some or all of the long bones, with retention of digits giving a ‘flipper’ or ‘seal-like’ appearance. Other external abnormalities included ear defects, microphthalmia and cleft lip/palate. In addition, approximately 40% died in early infancy from severe internal abnormalities affecting the heart, kidneys, or gastrointestinal tract. Some ‘thalidomide babies’ have grown up and had children of their own, and in some cases these offspring have also had similar defects. It is therefore most likely, not surprisingly, that thalidomide was wrongly blamed in a proportion of cases that were in fact from single-gene conditions following autosomal dominant inheritance (e.g., SALL4 mutations [see Figure 6.21, C, p. 99] in Okihiro syndrome).

The thalidomide tragedy focused attention on the importance of avoiding all drugs in pregnancy as far as is possible, unless absolute safety has been established. Drug manufacturers undertake extensive research trials before releasing a drug for general use, and invariably urge caution about the use of any new drug in pregnancy. Monitoring systems, in the form of congenital abnormality registers, have been set up in most Western countries so that it is unlikely that an ‘epidemic’ on the scale of the thalidomide tragedy could ever happen again.

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome

Children born to mothers who have consistently consumed large quantities of alcohol during pregnancy tend to show a degree of microcephaly, a distinctive facial appearance with short palpebral fissures, and a long smooth philtrum (Figure 16.16). They also show developmental delay with hyperactivity and clumsiness. This condition is referred to as fetal alcohol syndrome, but if the physical aspects are lacking the term ‘alcohol-related neurodevelopmental defects’ may be applied. There is uncertainty about the ‘safe’ level of alcohol consumption in pregnancy and there is evidence that mild-to-moderate ingestion can be harmful. Generally, total abstinence from alcohol is advised throughout pregnancy.

Maternal Infections

Several infectious agents can interfere with embryogenesis and fetal development (Table 16.7). The developing brain, eyes, and ears are particularly susceptible to damage by infection.

Table 16.7 Infectious Teratogenic Agents

Infection Effects
Viral
Cytomegalovirus Chorioretinitis, deafness, microcephaly
Herpes simplex Microcephaly, microphthalmia
Rubella Microcephaly, cataracts, retinitis, cardiac defects
Varicella zoster Microcephaly, chorioretinitis, skin defects
Bacterial
Syphilis Hydrocephalus, osteitis, rhinitis
Parasitic
Toxoplasmosis Hydrocephalus, microcephaly, cataracts, chorioretinitis, deafness

Maternal Illness

Several maternal illnesses are associated with an increased risk of an untoward pregnancy outcome.

Phenylketonuria

Another maternal metabolic condition that conveys a risk to the fetus is untreated phenylketonuria (p. 167). A high serum level of phenylalanine in a pregnant woman with phenylketonuria will almost invariably result in serious damage (e.g., mental retardation). Structural abnormalities may include microcephaly and congenital heart defects. All women with phenylketonuria should be strongly advised to adhere to a strict and closely monitored low phenylalanine diet before and throughout pregnancy.

Maternal Epilepsy

There is a large body of literature devoted to the question of maternal epilepsy, the link with congenital abnormalities, and the teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The largest and best controlled studies suggest that maternal epilepsy itself is not associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities. However, all studies have shown an increased incidence of birth defects in babies exposed to AEDs. The risks are in the region of 5% to 10%, which is two to five times the background population risk. These figures apply mainly to single drug therapy, and may be doubled if the fetus is exposed to more than one AED. Some drugs are more teratogenic than others, with the highest risks applying to sodium valproate. The range of abnormalities occurring in the ‘fetal anticonvulsant syndromes’ (FACS) are wide, including neural tube defect (about 2%), oral clefting, genitourinary abnormalities such as hypospadias, congenital heart disease, and limb defects. The abnormalities themselves are not specific to FACS, and making a diagnosis in an individual case can therefore be difficult. Sometimes characteristic facial features are seen, particularly in fetal valproate syndrome (Figure 16.17).

The most controversial aspect of AEDs and FACS is the risk of learning difficulties and behavioral problems. Controlled studies are problematic but evidence points to a higher incidence than in the general population—again, particularly in relation to sodium valproate. For practical purposes, potential risks to the fetus have to be weighed against the dangers of stopping AED treatment and risking seizures during pregnancy. If the patient has been seizure-free for at least 2 years, she can be offered withdrawal of anticonvulsant medication before proceeding with a pregnancy. If therapy is essential, then single-drug treatment is much preferred and sodium valproate should be avoided if possible.

Malformations of Unknown Cause

In up to 50% of all congenital abnormalities no clear cause can be established. This applies to many relatively common conditions such as isolated diaphragmatic hernia, tracheoesophageal fistula, anal atresia, and single-limb reduction defects. For an isolated limb defect, such as absence of a hand, it is reasonable to postulate that loss of vascular supply at a critical time during the development of the limb bud leads to developmental arrest, with the formation of only vestigial digits. It is more difficult to envisage how vascular occlusion could result in an abnormality such as esophageal atresia with an associated tracheoesophageal fistula.

Counseling

In cases where the precise diagnosis is uncertain, an assessment of symmetry and midline involvement may be helpful for genetic counseling. Although it may be very frustrating that no detailed explanation is possible, in many cases reassurance about a low recurrence risk in a future pregnancy can be given, based on empirical data. It is worth noting that this does not necessarily mean that genetic factors are irrelevant. Some ‘unexplained’ malformations and syndromes could well be due to new dominant mutations (p. 113), submicroscopic microdeletions (p. 280), or uniparental disomy (p. 121). All of these would convey negligible recurrence risks to future siblings, although those cases from new mutations or microdeletions would be associated with a significant risk to the offspring of affected individuals. There is optimism that molecular techniques will provide at least some of the answers to these many unresolved issues.

Further Reading

Aase J. Diagnostic dysmorphology. London: Plenum; 1990.

A detailed text of the art and science of dysmorphology.

Hanson JW. Human teratology. In: Rimoin DL, Connor JM, Pyeritz RE, editors. Principles and practice of medical genetics. 3rd edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997:697-724.

A comprehensive, balanced overview of known and suspected human teratogens.

Jones KL. Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006.

The standard pediatric textbook guide to syndromes.

Smithells RW, Newman CGH. Recognition of thalidomide defects. J Med Genet. 1992;29:716-723.

A comprehensive account of the spectrum of abnormalities caused by thalidomide.

Spranger J, Benirschke K, Hall JG, et al. Errors of morphogenesis: concepts and terms. Recommendations of an international working group. J Pediatr. 1982;100:160-165.

A short article providing a classification and clarification of the terms used to describe birth defects.

Stevenson RE, Hall JG, Goodman RM. Human malformations and related anomalies. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

The definitive guide, in two volumes, to human malformations.