Complex regional pain syndrome

Published on 07/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1277 times

Complex regional pain syndrome

Nicole M. Dawson, MD

Terminology

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II—formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia, respectively—are chronic pain disorders characterized by varying degrees of hyperalgesia, allodynia, edema, vasomotor and sudomotor instability, trophic changes, and bone rarefaction.

In CRPS type I, the initial event, whether spontaneous or a major insult, does not affect any particular nerve. The hallmark of CRPS type I is continuing pain disproportionately more severe than expected given the injury. The pain, dystrophy, and features of autonomic instability progress and affect regions of the extremity not involved in the initial injury. Severe cases may involve the entire limb or the contralateral extremity. CRPS type I can result from ischemia of the viscera, cardiac myocytes, or cerebrovascular bed.

Conversely, CRPS type II results from injury to an identifiable nerve. It is distinct from a peripheral mononeuropathy in that the afflicted region extends beyond the predicted nerve distribution.

Etiology

The pathophysiology underlying both types of CRPS remains incompletely understood. Emerging research points to an element of peripheral sensitization in disease development. Upregulation and hypersensitivity of adrenergic receptors and functional coupling between sympathetic efferent and sensory afferent fibers may provide the basis for the sympathetic nervous system abnormalities characteristic of CRPS. Central sensitization or “wind-up” of the dorsal horn neurons, brainstem, or thalamus, along with remodeling of the primary somatosensory cortex and disinhibition of the motor cortex, appear to play key roles in more severe forms of CRPS.

Sympathetically mediated pain responding to central or peripheral sympathetic blockade variably contributes to the overall pain experienced by patients. Additional sympathetically independent mediators have been identified. Elevated levels of circulating free radicals, inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-α), neuropeptides (substance P, bradykinin, neuropeptide Y, and calcitonin G-related protein), and cerebrospinal fluid levels of glutamate have been measured in patients with CRPS. Associations have been demonstrated between disease onset, responsiveness to treatment, features of dystonia, and the presence of HLA class I and II polymorphisms among patients with CRPS, suggesting a possible genetic component to the disease.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis is made by clinical observation, because currently no objective diagnostic criteria exist. In an effort to improve diagnostic predictability, it has been suggested that patients report at least one symptom in each category and demonstrate at minimum one sign in two or more categories (Table 213-1). Using these clinical criteria based on the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) guidelines improves diagnostic specificity (94%) at the expense of sensitivity (70%). The differential diagnosis includes small-fiber and diabetic neuropathies, entrapment, degenerative disc disease, thoracic outlet syndrome, cellulitis, vascular insufficiency, thrombophlebitis, lymphedema, angioedema, erythromelalgia, and deep venous thrombosis.

Table 213-1

International Association for the Study of Pain Criteria for the Diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome*

Category Signs and Symptoms
Sensory Allodynia
Hyperalgesia
Hyperesthesia
Hypoalgesia
Vasomotor Livedo reticularis
Skin color changes
Temperature variability
Sudomotor Edema
Hyperhidrosis
Hypohidrosis
Motor Decreased range of motion
Neglect
Tremor
Weakness

*Diagnostic predictability improves when patients report at least one symptom in each category and one sign in two or more categories.

Laboratory studies may provide objective results to assist in the diagnosis of CRPS. Thermometry, quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART), thermoregulatory sweat testing, laser Doppler flowmetry, three-phase bone scintigraphy, plain radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging studies have been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of CRPS. In the past, CRPS types I and II were thought to progress through several stages, which vary significantly in temporal duration (Table 213-2).

Table 213-2

Stages of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Stage Presentation
Acute/warm Burning or aching pain increasing with physical contact or emotional stress
Edema
Unstable temperature and color of limb
Increased periarticular uptake on scintigraphy
Accelerated hair and nail growth
Joint stiffness
Muscle spasm
Dystrophic Indurated, cool, hyperhidrotic, cyanotic, mottled skin
Joint space narrowing
Muscle weakness
Osteoporotic changes on radiography
Atrophic/cold Ankylosis
Hair loss
Muscle atrophy
Tendon contractures
Thickening of fascia
Thin shiny skin

Treatment

Several multimodal treatments are in clinical use. Because of the lack of diagnostic criteria and inherent heterogeneity of CRPS, high-quality studies evidencing therapeutic efficacy remain scarce.

Pharmacologic therapy

Randomized controlled trials conducted on patients with CRPS support the use of alendronate, corticosteroids, parenteral and topical ketamine, antiepileptics (gabapentin), N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of “cold” CRPS, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for the treatment of “warm” CRPS, epidural clonidine, vitamin C for prevention, and intrathecal administration of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-agonists (baclofen) for symptomatic relief of dystonia.

Additional treatments in practice but with less conclusive or conflicting evidence supporting their use in this patient population include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents; opioids; tricyclic antidepressants, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or other antidepressants; sarpogrelate; topical capsaicin; calcitonin; intravenously administered lidocaine; and topically applied local anesthetic agents.

Procedural techniques

Intravenously administered regional blockade using guanethidine and reserpine is not supported by evidence based on randomized controlled trials. However, one small (n = 12) published, randomized, controlled trial of intravenously administered regional blockade using bretylium and lidocaine, compared with lidocaine alone, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in analgesia.

Traditionally, sympathetic blockade techniques such as stellate ganglion and lumbar plexus blocks have been viewed as a gold standard for CRPS treatment, yet there is a remarkable paucity of data supporting their therapeutic use. Permanent chemical, thermal, and surgical neurolysis are also used in clinical practice, but controlled studies regarding their long-term utility are lacking. Sympathetic blockade is at times employed to facilitate functional restoration exercises and has been shown to aid in the prediction of successful treatment with spinal cord stimulation (SCS).

Literature supporting SCS is similarly limited to studies comprising small numbers of patients. A nonrandomized prospective trial of SCS in patients with CRPS responsive to sympathetic blockade demonstrated significant improvement in pain relief and strength over a mean of 35 months. In a different randomized study comparing patients with CRPS treated with physical therapy to patients undergoing physical therapy and SCS, SCS plus physical therapy resulted in decreased pain intensity and improved global perceived effect for a duration of up to 2 years; these significant findings were not apparent at 5-year follow-up.

Limited evidence supports the use of permanent peripheral nerve stimulators in the treatment of CRPS type II. Mirror and motor imagery therapies have been shown in preliminary, randomized, crossover studies to significantly decrease pain and improve functionality.

CRPS may resolve spontaneously, but significant disability can persist for years with periods of remission and relapse despite treatment. Cold CRPS appears to prognosticate a worse outcome. Estimated rates of return to original functional status vary from 20% to 40%.