Complement

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4508 times

Chapter 4 Complement

Summary

Complement is central to the development of inflammatory reactions and forms one of the major immune defense systems of the body. The complement system serves as one of the links between the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system.

Complement activation pathways have evolved to label pathogens for elimination. The classical pathway links to the adaptive immune system through antibody. The alternative and lectin pathways provide antibody-independent ‘innate’ immunity, and the alternative pathway is linked to and amplifies the classical pathway.

The complement system is carefully controlled to protect the body from excessive or inappropriate inflammatory responses. C1 inhibitor controls the classical and lectin pathways. C3 and C5 convertase activity are controlled by decay and enzymatic degradation. Membrane attack is inhibited on host cells by CD59.

The membrane attack pathway results in the formation of a lytic transmembrane pore. Regulation of the membrane attack pathway by CD59 reduces the risk of ‘bystander’ damage to adjacent host cells.

Many cells express one or more membrane receptors for complement products. Receptors for fragments of C3 are widely distributed on different leukocyte populations. Receptors for C1q are present on phagocytes, mast cells, and platelets. C5 fragment receptors are present on many cell types. The plasma complement regulator fH binds leukocyte surfaces.

Complement has a variety of functions. Its principal functions include opsonization, chemotaxis and cell activation, lysis of target cells, and priming of the adaptive immune response.

Complement deficiencies illustrate the homeostatic roles of complement. Classical pathway deficiencies result in tissue inflammation. Deficiencies of mannan-binding lectin (MBL) are associated with infections in infants and the immunosuppressed. Alternative pathway and C3 deficiencies are associated with bacterial infections. Terminal pathway deficiencies predispose to Gram-negative bacterial infections. C1 inhibitor deficiency leads to hereditary angioedema. Deficiencies in alternative pathway regulators produce a secondary loss of C3.

Complement and inflammation

The complement system was discovered at the end of the 19th century as a heat-labile component of serum that augmented (or ‘complemented’) its bactericidal properties.

Complement is now known to comprise some 16 plasma proteins, together constituting nearly 10% of the total serum proteins, and forming one of the major immune defense systems of the body (Fig. 4.1). In addition to serving as a key component of the innate immune system, complement also interfaces with and enhances adaptive immune responses. More than a dozen regulatory proteins are present in plasma and on cells to control complement. The functions of the complement system include:

In evolutionary terms the complement system is very ancient and antedates the development of the adaptive immune system: even starfish and worms have a functional complement system.

The importance of complement in immune defense is readily apparent in individuals who lack particular components – for example, children who lack the central component C3 are subject to overwhelming bacterial infections.

Like most elements of the immune system, when overactivated or activated in the wrong place, the complement system can cause harm.

Complement is involved in the pathology of many diseases, provoking a search for therapies that control complement activation.

Complement activation pathways

One major function of complement is to label pathogens and other foreign or toxic bodies for elimination from the host. The complement activation pathways have evolved to serve this purpose, and the multiple ways in which activation can be triggered, together with intrinsic amplification mechanisms, ensure efficient recognition and clearance.

Moreover, there are several different ways to activate the complement system, so providing a large degree of flexibility in response (Fig. 4.2).

The first activation pathway to be discovered, now termed the classical pathway, is initiated by antibodies bound to the surface of the target. Although an efficient means of activation, it requires an adaptive immune response: that is, the host must have previously encountered the target microorganism in order for an antibody response to be generated.

The alternative pathway, described in the 1950s, provides an antibody-independent mechanism for complement activation on pathogen surfaces.

The lectin pathway, the most recently described activation pathway, also bypasses antibody to enable efficient activation on pathogens.

All three pathways – classical, alternative, and lectin pathways:

Thus a small initial stimulus can rapidly generate a large effect. Figure 4.3 summarizes how each of the pathways is activated.

All activation pathways converge on a common terminal pathway – a non-enzymatic system for causing membrane disruption and lytic killing of pathogens.

The immune defense and pathological effects of complement activation are mediated by the fragments and complexes generated during activation:

The details of complement activation, the nomenclature, and the ways in which the pathways are controlled are shown in Figure 4.4.

image

Fig. 4.4 Overview of the complement activation pathways

The proteins of the classical and alternative pathways are assigned numbers (e.g. C1, C2). Many of these are zymogens (i.e. pro-enzymes that require proteolytic cleavage to become active). The cleavage products of complement proteins are distinguished from parent molecules by suffix letters (e.g. C3a, C3b). The proteins of the alternative pathway are called ‘factors’ and are identified by single letters (e.g. factor B, which may be abbreviated to fB or just ‘B’). Components are shown in green, conversion steps as white arrows, and activation/cleavage steps as red arrows. The classical pathway is activated by the cleavage of C1r and C1s following association of C1qr2s2 with classical pathway activators (see Fig. 4.3), including immune complexes. Activated C1s cleaves C4 and C2 to form the classical pathway C3 convertase image. Cleavage of C4 and C2 can also be effected via MASP-2 of the lectin pathway, which is associated with mannan-binding lectin (MBL) or ficolin. The alternative pathway is activated by the cleavage of C3 to C3b, which associates with factor B and is cleaved by factor D to generate the alternative pathway C3 convertase image. The initial activation of C3 happens to some extent spontaneously, but this step can also be affected by classical or alternative pathway C3 convertases or a number of other serum or microbial proteases. Note that C3b generated in the alternative pathway can bind more factor B and generate a positive feedback loop to amplify activation on the surface. Note also that the activation pathways are functionally analogous, and the diagram emphasizes these similarities. For example, C3 and C4 are homologous, as are C2 and factor B. MASP-2 is homologous to C1r and C1s. Either the classical or alternative pathway C3 convertases may associate with C3b bound on a cell surface to form C5 convertases, image, or image, which split C5. The larger fragment C5b associates with C6 and C7, which can then bind to plasma membranes. The complex of C5b67 assembles C8 and a number of molecules of C9 to form a membrane attack complex (MAC), C5b–9.

The classical pathway links to the adaptive immune system

The classical pathway is activated by antibody bound to antigen and requires Ca2+

Only surface-bound IgG and IgM antibodies can activate complement, and they do so via the classical pathway. Surface binding is the key:

The first component of the pathway, C1, is a complex molecule comprising a large, 6-headed recognition unit termed C1q and two molecules each of C1r and C1s, the enzymatic units of the complex (Fig. 4.5). Assembly of the C1 complex is Ca2+-dependent, and the classical pathway is therefore inactive if Ca2+ ions are absent.

The alternative and lectin pathways provide antibody-independent ‘innate’ immunity

The lectin pathway is activated by microbial carbohydrates

The lectin pathway differs from the classical pathway only in the initial recognition and activation steps. Indeed, it can be argued that the lectin pathway should not be considered a separate pathway, but rather a route for classical pathway activation that bypasses the need for antibody.

The C1 complex is replaced by a structurally similar multimolecular complex, comprising a C1q-like recognition unit, either mannan-binding lectin (MBL) or ficolin (actually a family of three proteins in man), and several MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs). MASP-2 provides enzymatic activity. As in the classical pathway, assembly of this initiating complex is Ca2+-dependent.

C1q and MBL are members of the collectin family of proteins characterized by globular head regions with binding activities and long collagenous tail regions with diverse roles (see Fig. 6.w3image). Ficolins are structurally similar but the head regions comprise fibrinogen-like domains.

MBL binds the simple carbohydrates mannose and N-acetyl glucosamine, while ficolins bind acetylated sugars and other molecules; these ligands are abundant in the cell walls of diverse pathogens, including bacteria, yeast, fungi, and viruses, making them targets for lectin pathway activation. Binding induces shape changes in MBL and ficolins that in turn induce autocatalytic activation of MASP-2. This enzyme can then cleave C4 and C2 to continue activation exactly as in the classical pathway.

The lectin pathway is not the only means of activating the classical pathway in the absence of antibody. Apoptotic cells, released DNA, mitochondria and other products of cell damage can directly bind C1q, triggering complement activation and aiding the clearance of the dead and dying tissue.

The image complex is the C3 convertase of the alternative pathway

Once bound to C3(H2O) or C3b, fB becomes a substrate for an intrinsically active plasma enzyme termed factor D (fD). fD cuts fB in the C3bB complex:

The image complex is the C3 cleaving enzyme (C3 convertase) of the alternative pathway. C3b generated by this convertase can be fed back into the pathway to create more C3 convertases, thus forming a positive feedback amplification loop (Fig. 4.7). Activation may occur in plasma or, more efficiently, on surfaces.

Specific features of host cell surfaces, including their surface carbohydrates and the presence of complement regulators (see below), act to protect the host cell from alternative pathway activation and risk of being destroyed, and such surfaces are termed non-activating.

On an activating surface such as a bacterial membrane, amplification will occur unimpeded and the surface will rapidly become coated with C3b (see Fig. 4.7). In a manner analogous to that seen in the classical pathway, C3b molecules binding to the C3 convertase will change the substrate specificity of the complex, creating a C5 cleaving enzyme, image.

Cleavage of C5 is the last proteolytic step in the alternative pathway and the C5b fragment remains associated with the convertase.

Complement protection systems

Control of the complement system is required to prevent the consumption of components through unregulated amplification and to protect the host. Complement activation poses a potential threat to host cells, because it could lead to cell opsonization or even lysis. To defend against this threat a family of regulators has evolved alongside the complement system to prevent uncontrolled activation and protect cells from attack.

C3 and C5 convertase activity are controlled by decay and enzymatic degradation

The C3 and C5 convertase enzymes are heavily policed with plasma and cell membrane inhibitors to control activation. In the plasma:

On membranes, two proteins, membrane cofactor protein (MCP) and decay accelerating factor (DAF), collaborate to destroy the convertases of both pathways (Fig. 4.8).

The regulators of the C3 and C5 convertases are structurally related molecules that have arisen by gene duplication in evolution. These duplicated genes are tightly linked in a cluster on chromosome 1, termed the regulators of complement activation (RCA) locus. This locus also encodes several of the complement receptors (see below).

Control of the convertases is mediated in two complementary ways

The membrane attack pathway

Activation of the pathway results in the formation of a transmembrane pore

The terminal or membrane attack pathway involves a distinctive set of events whereby a group of five globular plasma proteins associate with one another and, in the process, acquire membrane-binding and pore-forming capacity to form the membrane attack complex (MAC).

The MAC is a transmembrane pore (Fig. 4.10). Cleavage of C5 creates the nidus for MAC assembly to begin. While still attached to the convertase enzyme, C5b binds first C6 then C7 from the plasma. Conformational changes occurring during assembly of this trimolecular C5b67 complex:

The complex can stably associate with a membrane through the labile hydrophobic site, though the process is inefficient and most of the C5b67 formed is inactivated in the fluid phase.

Membrane-bound C5b67 recruits C8 from the plasma, and, finally, multiple copies of C9 are incorporated in the complex to form the MAC.

The latter stages of assembly are accompanied by major conformational changes in the components with globular hydrophilic plasma proteins unfolding to reveal amphipathic regions that penetrate into and through the lipid bilayer.

The fully formed MAC creates a rigid pore in the membrane, the walls of which are formed from multiple copies of C9 (up to 12), arranged like barrel staves around a central cavity.

The MAC is clearly visible in electron microscopic images of complement lysed cells as doughnut-shaped protein-lined pores, first observed by Humphrey and Dourmashkin 40 years ago (see Fig. 4.10). The pore has an inner diameter approaching 10 nm:

Metabolically inert targets such as aged erythrocytes are readily lysed by even a small number of MAC lesions, whereas viable nucleated cells resist killing through a combination of ion pump activities and recovery processes that remove MAC lesions and plug membrane leaks.

Even in the absence of cell killing, MAC lesions may severely compromise cell function or cause cell activation.

Regulation of the membrane attack pathway reduces the risk of ‘bystander’ damage to adjacent cells

Although regulation in the activation pathways is the major way in which complement is controlled, there are further failsafe mechanisms to protect self cells from MAC damage and lysis.

First, the membrane binding site in C5b67 is labile. If the complex does not encounter a membrane within a fraction of a second after release from the convertase, the site is lost through:

C8, an essential component of the MAC, also behaves as a regulator in that binding of C8 to C5b–7 in the fluid phase blocks the membrane binding site and prevents MAC formation.

The net effect of all these plasma controls is to limit MAC deposition to membranes in the immediate vicinity of the site of complement activation, so reducing risk of ‘bystander’ damage to adjacent cells.

Membrane receptors for complement products

Receptors for fragments of C3 are widely distributed on different leukocyte populations

Many cells express one or more membrane receptors for complement products (Fig. 4.12). An understanding of the receptors is essential because the majority of the effects of complement are mediated through these molecules. The best characterized of the complement receptors are those binding fragments of C3.

Complement functions

The principal functions of complement are:

C3a and C5a activate mast cells and basophils

Tissue mast cells and basophils also express C3aR and C5aR, and binding of ligand triggers massive release of:

Together, these products cause local smooth muscle contraction and increased vascular permeability to generate the swelling, heat, and pain that typify the inflammatory response. These effects mirror on a local scale the more generalized and severe reactions that can occur in severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions, and for this reason C3a and C5a are sometimes referred to as anaphylatoxins.

The actions of C3a and C5a are limited temporally and spatially by the activity of a plasma enzyme, carboxypeptidase-N, which cleaves the carboxy terminal amino acid, arginine, from both of these fragments. The products, termed C3a-desArg and C5a-desArg (-desArg = without arginine), respectively, have either much reduced (C5a-desArg) or absent (C3a-desArg) anaphylatoxin activities.

The retention in C5a-desArg of some chemotactic activity enables the recruitment of phagocytes even from distant sites, making C5a and its metabolite the most important complement-derived chemotactic factor.

An important role for C3a-desArg in lipid handling has emerged. A mediator of increased lipid uptake and fat synthesis in adipose tissue, acylation stimulating protein (ASP), was shown to be identical to C3a-desArg, linking complement activation to lipid turnover. Of note, adipose tissue is the primary site for fD synthesis and also produces C3; a complete alternative pathway can thus be assembled locally to generate C3a-desArg/ASP.

C3b and iC3b are important opsonins

Complement activation and amplification cause complement fragments to efficiently coat activator surfaces of targets such as bacteria or immune complexes, enhancing their recognition by phagocytes (Fig. 4.14). Phagocytes and other cells carrying receptors for these complement fragments are then able to bind the target, triggering ingestion and cell activation. The key players here are the surface-bound fragments of C3 and the family of C3 fragment receptors described above.

The amplification inherent in the system ensures that bacteria and other activating surfaces rapidly become coated with C3b and its breakdown product iC3b, which enhances phagocytosis.

Phagocytes lured by the complement-derived chemotactic factors described above and activated to increase expression of CR1 and CR3 (receptors for C3b and iC3b, respectively) will bind the activating particle and engulf it for destruction in the phagosome system.

The importance of complement opsonization for defense against pathogens is illustrated in individuals deficient in complement components. C3 deficiency in particular is always associated with repeated severe bacterial infections that without adequate prophylaxis inevitably lead to early death.

The MAC damages some bacteria and enveloped viruses

Assembly of the MAC creates a pore that inserts into and through the lipid bilayer, breaching the membrane barrier (see Fig. 4.10). The consequences of MAC attack vary from target to target:

Gram-negative bacteria are protected by a double cell membrane separated by a peptidoglycan wall. Precisely how MAC traverses these protective structures to damage the inner bacterial membrane and causes osmotic lysis of these organisms remains unclear. The MAC:

Erythrocytes have only a limited capacity to resist and repair damage and can be lysed, as is seen in autoimmune hemolytic anemias and some other hemolytic disorders. Although nucleated host cells may escape lysis by MAC, the insertion of pores in the membrane is not without consequence. Ions, particularly Ca2+, flow into the cell and cause activation events with diverse outcomes that may contribute to disease.

Immune complexes with bound C3b are very efficient in priming B cells

Complement is a key component of the innate immune response. However, it has recently become apparent that complement also plays important roles in adaptive immunity. This realization arose from studies in complement-depleted and complement-deficient mice in which antibody responses to foreign particles were markedly reduced. At least three linked mechanisms contribute to this effect (Fig. 4.15):

The overriding principle of this ‘adjuvant’ effect of C3 opsonization is that simultaneous engagement of CR2 and BCR on the B cell, by recruiting signaling molecules to form an activation complex on the B cell surface, efficiently triggers the B cell response. As a consequence, complement-opsonized particles may be 1000-fold as active as the unopsonized particle in triggering antibody production.

More recently, roles for both C3a and C5a as modifiers of antigen presentation by FDC and other DCs have emerged; the physiological relevance of these interactions is not yet clear.

Complement deficiencies

Genetic deficiencies of each of the complement components and many of the regulators have been described and provide valuable ‘experiments of nature’ illustrating the homeostatic roles of complement. In general, complement deficiencies are rare, though some deficiencies are much more common in some racial groups.

A variety of assays (Method box 4.1)image are available for detecting:

The consequences of a deficiency in part of the complement system depend upon the pathway(s) affected (Fig. 4.16).

Classical pathway deficiencies result in tissue inflammation

Deficiency of any of the components of the classical pathway (C1, C4, and C2) predisposes to a condition that closely resembles the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in which immune complexes become deposited in capillary networks, particularly in kidney, skin, and brain.

Deficiency of any of the C1 subunits (C1q, C1r, or C1s) invariably causes severe disease with typical SLE features including skin lesions and kidney damage. The disease usually manifests early in childhood and few patients reach adulthood.

C4 deficiency also causes severe SLE. Total deficiency of C4 is extremely rare because C4 is encoded by two separate genes (C4A and C4B), but partial deficiencies of C4 are relatively common and are associated with an increased incidence of SLE.

C2 deficiency is the commonest complement deficiency in Caucasians. Although it predisposes to SLE, the majority of C2-deficient individuals are healthy.

The large majority of cases of SLE are, however, not associated with complement deficiencies, and autoimmune SLE is discussed in Chapter 20. The historical view of immune complex disease in classical pathway deficiency was based upon defective immune complex handling.

Although these mechanisms of immune complex handling undoubtedly contribute, a new perspective has recently developed that takes a different view of the role of complement in waste management.

Cells continually die by apoptosis in tissues and are removed silently by tissue macrophages. Complement contributes to this essential process because the apoptotic cell binds C1q and activates the classical pathway. In C1 deficiencies, apoptotic cells accumulate in the tissues and eventually undergo necrosis, which releases toxic cell contents and causes inflammation.

This recent observation, emerging from studies in complement deficiencies, has altered the way we think of the handling of waste in the body and moved complement to center-stage in this vital housekeeping role.

C1 inhibitor deficiency causes hereditary angioedema

Deficiency of the classical pathway regulator C1inh is responsible for the syndrome hereditary angioedema (HAE). C1inh regulates C1 in the classical pathway and MBL/MASP-2 (or ficolin-MASP-2) in the lectin pathway and also controls activation in the kinin pathway that leads to the generation of bradykinin and other active kinins. The condition and the underlying pathways are outlined in Chapter 16 (see Figs 16.14 & 16.15) and additional detail is given below.image

C1inh deficiency is a dominant condition

HAE is relatively common because the disease presents even in those heterozygous for the deficiency (i.e. it is an autosomal dominant disease).

The halved C1inh synthetic capacity in those with HAE cannot maintain plasma levels in the face of continuing consumption of C1inh, which is a suicide inhibitor that is consumed as it works. As a consequence, the plasma levels measured are often only 10–20% of normal, even in periods of apparent good health.

Episodes of angioedema are often triggered in the skin or mucous membranes by minor trauma – occasionally stress may be sufficient to induce an attack. Swelling, which may be remarkable in severity, rapidly ensues as unregulated activation of the kinin and complement systems occurs in the affected area, inducing vascular leakiness. Swelling of mucous membranes in the mouth and throat may block the airways, leading to asphyxia (Fig. 4.w1). Involvement of gut mucosa can cause intestinal obstruction, presenting with acute abdominal symptoms.

Episodes of angioedema are transient and usually wane over the course of a few hours without therapy. Emergency treatment for life-threatening attacks involves the infusion of a purified C1inh concentrate. Although available in Europe for over 30 years, C1inh has only recently been approved for therapy of HAE in the US. Prophylactic treatment usually involves the induction of C1inh synthesis using anabolic steroids, or minimizing consumption of C1inh using protease inhibitors; however, C1inh is increasingly being used in prophylaxis.

Although the majority of cases of HAE involve a mutation that prevents synthesis of C1inh by the defective gene (type I), in about 15% of cases the mutation results in the production of a functionally defective protein (type II). In type II HAE, the plasma levels of C1inh may be normal or even high, but its function is markedly impaired, leading to disease.

A similar syndrome to type II HAE can develop later in life. Acquired angioedema is, in most or all cases, associated with autoantibodies that:

Occasionally, acquired angioedema occurs in association with a lymphoproliferative disorder, likely secondary to classical pathway activation and C1inh consumption by the tumor mass.

Complement polymorphisms and disease

Common polymorphisms are found in almost all complement proteins and regulators; associations with inflammatory and infectious diseases have been reported, particularly with respect to alternative pathway proteins and regulators. Most strikingly, a common polymorphism in fH (fHY402H) is strongly associated with the common, blinding eye disease, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), homozygosity for the H allele increasing risk of disease up to 7-fold. Polymorphisms in C3 and fB are also linked to AMD, suggesting that dysregulation of the alternative pathway underlies the pathology in this disease.

Further reading

Barrington R., Zhang M., Fischer M., Carroll M.C. The role of complement in inflammation and adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev. 2001;180:5–15.

Botto M., Kirschfink M., Macor P., et al. Complement in human diseases: lessons from complement deficiencies. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2774–2783.

Cole D.S., Morgan B.P. Beyond lysis: how complement influences cell fate. Clin Sci. 2003;104:455–466.

Colten H.R., Rosen F.S. Complement deficiencies. Annu Rev Immunol. 1992;10:809–834.

Davis A.E., 3rd. The pathogenesis of hereditary angioedema. Transfus Apher Sci. 2003;39:195–203.

De Cordoba S.R., de Jorge E.J. Genetics and disease associations of complement factor H. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151:1–13.

Dodds A.W., Ren X.D., Willis A.C., et al. The reaction mechanism of the internal thioester in the human complement component C4. Nature. 1996;379:177–179.

Frank M.M., Fries L.F. The role of complement in inflammation and phagocytosis. Immunol Today. 1991;12:322–326.

Gerard C., Gerard N.P. C5a anaphylatoxin and its seven transmembrane-segment receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:775–808.

Holmskov U., Malhotra R., Sim R.B., et al. Collectins: collagenous C-type lectins of the innate immune defense system. Immunol Today. 1994;14:67–74.

Hourcade D., Holers V.M., Atkinson J.P. The regulators of complement activation (RCA) gene cluster. Adv Immunol. 1989;45:381–416.

Jack D.L., Klein N.J., Turner M.W. Mannose-binding lectin: targeting the microbial world for complement attack and opsonophagocytosis. Immunol Rev. 2001;180:86–99.

Kavanagh D., Richards J., Atkinson J. Complement regulatory genes and hemolytic uremic syndromes. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:293–309.

Kemper C., Atkinson J.P. T cell regulation: with complements from innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:9–18.

Lambris J.D., Reid K.B.M., Volanakis J.E. The evolution, structure, biology and pathophysiology of complement. Immunol Today. 1999;20:207–211.

Lambris J.D., Ricklin D., Geisbrecht B.V. Complement evasion by human pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:132–142.

Liszewski M.K., Farries T.C., Lublin D.M., et al. Control of the complement system. Adv Immunol. 1996;61:201–283.

Manderson A.P., Botto M., Walport M.J. The role of complement in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:432–456.

Moffitt M.C., Frank M.M. Complement resistance in microbes. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1994;15:327–344.

Morgan B.P. Complement regulatory molecules: application to therapy and transplantation. Immunol Today. 1995;16:257–259.

Morgan B.P. Complement in inflammation. In: Rey K., ed. Physiology of inflammation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:131–145.

Morgan B.P. Hereditary angioedema: therapies old and new. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:581–583.

Morgan B.P., Harris C.L. Complement therapeutics; history and current progress. Mol Immunol. 2003;40:159–170.

Morgan B.P., Meri S. Membrane proteins that protect against complement lysis. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1994;15:369–396.

Morgan B.P., Walport M.J. Complement deficiency and disease. Immunol Today. 1991;12:301–306.

Muller-Eberhard H.J. The membrane attack complex of complement. Annu Rev Immunol. 1986;4:503–528.

Nonaka M., Yoshizaki F. Evolution of the complement system. Mol Immunol. 2004;40:879–902.

Norris M., Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1676–1687.

Ricklin D., Hajishengallis G., Yang J., Lambris J.D. Complement: a key system for immunosurveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:785–797.

Walport M.J. Complement: first of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1058–1066.

Walport M.J. Complement: second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1140–1144.

Zipfel P.F., Skerka C. Complement regulators and inhibitory proteins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:729–740.