Clinical examination of the thoracic spine

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5461 times

25

Clinical examination of the thoracic spine

image

Introduction

Thoracic or abdominal wall pain is a common complaint and poses a major diagnostic challenge to physician and therapist.

The pain is often referred from visceral disorders, although the frequency of musculoskeletal lesions of the thorax and the abdomen should not be underestimated. A physician not familiar with the musculoskeletal disorders of the region could be tempted to ascribe unexplained pain to vague lesions such as intercostal neuralgia, neuritis, cardiac neurosis, pleurodynia or rib syndromes. Again, lack of an exact diagnosis leads to inadequate and unsuccessful treatment. The absence of a precise (orthopaedic) diagnosis can, to a certain extent, be a consequence of the complexity of the region itself. However, another important reason is the lack of an appropriate clinical approach to this part of the body. Thorough examination should not be restricted to the routine visceral examination (e.g. auscultation, percussion and palpation) but also must include proper orthopaedic and neurological tests. Although a large number of reliable technical investigations for detecting all types of visceral disorders are available, the same cannot be said when it comes to musculoskeletal disorders, for which technical investigations are often of limited diagnostic value.

Clinically, the thoracic region is approached in a different way from the cervical or the lumbar spine because it behaves differently in many aspects.

Principal differences between the thoracic and the lumbar and cervical spines

Visceral versus musculoskeletal pain

Because referred pain from visceral problems can mimic pain of musculoskeletal origin and vice versa, the first step towards diagnosis must always be to differentiate these two categories. The character of the pain is usually of little help in the differential diagnosis because it has the same features in both. Pain referred from heart, lungs and intestines is usually poorly localized and vaguely delineated, and is referred to a segmental or multisegmental distribution. The behaviour of the pain may also mislead the examiner. One of the main characteristics of pain in lesions of moving parts is that it is brought on by posture and movement. This is also the case in thoracic lesions: if the patient’s symptoms depend on activity rather than on visceral function, a cause originating from moving parts should be considered. However, it is important to keep in mind the fact that posture, physical activity, a deep breath or a cough may also influence visceral pain in the thorax or abdomen.

The best method of differentiating is to work in two complementary ways: exclusion of any visceral disorder through a thorough internal check-up, together with positive confirmation of a provisional orthopaedic diagnosis (Fig. 25.1). This routine will also safeguard against unnecessary technical investigations and delays in diagnosis and treatment.13

Discal lesions

Discodural and discoradicular interactions are well-known causes of cervical and lumbar pain.

In a discodural lesion, a shifted component of the disc impinges on the dura and causes pain that has multisegmental characteristics (crossing the midline and occupying several dermatomes). Discodural conflicts are characterized by two sets of symptoms and signs: articular and dural (see Ch. 33).

In a discoradicular lesion, the subluxated disc component impinges on the nerve root and its dural sleeve. The pain and paraesthesia that result are strictly segmental. Discoradicular conflicts are characterized by three sets of symptoms and signs: articular, root and cord.

Disc lesions also commonly occur in the thoracic spine but often show characteristics that are quite different from those found at the lumbar and cervical spines.

• The articular signs are subtle: a discodural interaction at the cervical or lumbar level usually presents with a clear partial articular pattern: some movements hurt or are limited and others do not, always in an asymmetrical way. This is not so in the thoracic spine. Because of the rigidity of the thorax, such an obvious pattern is seldom found. Very often, only one of the six passive movements, usually a rotation, is positive and then only slightly so. Therefore diagnosis in the thoracic spine is more tentative and may have to be based on smaller, subtler abnormalities.

• Neurological deficit is seldom encountered in a thoracic disc lesion: whereas some degree of neurological deficit is a common finding in cervical or lumbar posterolateral disc lesions, muscular weakness is rarely detectable in thoracic discoradicular lesions. Also, disturbance of sensation is very rare. This absence of neurological signs is probably the outcome of the location of the nerve root in the intervertebral foramen, where it lies mainly behind the lower aspect of the vertebral body and less behind the disc (see online chapter Applied anatomy of the thorax and abdomen).

• There is no tendency to spontaneous recovery: in the lumbar and cervical spines there is usually a spontaneous cure for root pain, which seldom lasts longer than 4 months at the cervical level and 12 months at the lumbar level. At the thoracic level, no such tendency exists and constant root pain can persist for many years.

• Protrusions can usually be reduced: although thoracic disc lesions are more difficult to diagnose, they are easily and effectively cured. Protrusions – no matter how long they have been present, or whether they are posterocentral or posterolateral, or soft or hard – can usually be reduced by 1–3 sessions of manipulations. Unlike at the lumbar or cervical levels, time is not a criterion for reducibility. Hence a disc displacement may well prove reducible after constant root pain, even of several years’ standing. Traction is seldom required because the protrusions are usually of the annular type.

Referred pain

Both musculoskeletal and visceral lesions can be the source of pain referred to the thoracic and/or abdominal wall.

Pain referred from musculoskeletal structures

Dura mater and nerve roots

Pain originating from the dura mater is referred in a multisegmental way: it crosses the midline and may cover several consecutive dermatomes (see p. 18). A possible explanation for this phenomenon may lie in its multisegmental origin, which is reflected in the considerable overlap between the fibres of the consecutive sinuvertebral nerves innervating its anterior aspect.4 Recent research has demonstrated that dural pain may spread over eight segments with considerable overlap between adjacent and contralateral dura mater.5 This may be an explanation for the fact that lower cervical discodural conflicts may produce pain that spreads into the upper thoracic level (Fig. 25.2a) or that lumbar dural pain causes pain in the lower thoracic region (Fig. 25.2b).

Pain originating from a nerve root sleeve has a strict segmental reference and is restricted to the borders of the dermatome.

Thoracic disc lesions may thus cause referred pain in the thorax, not only as the result of extrasegmental reference in the case of discodural contact, but also when a discoradicular interaction has been created. However, cervical and lumbar discal lesions may also be the origin of thoracic referred pain.

Cervical disc lesions

Some cervical disc lesions may cause pain in the thoracic region.

Thoracic disc lesions

Thoracic discodural and discoradicular interactions are common causes of referred pain in the thoracic and abdominal region.

Thoracic discodural interactions

It is important to note that extrasegmental pain from a posterocentral thoracic disc protrusion usually remains in the trunk itself, where it can spread anteriorly and/or posteriorly over several segments (see Fig. 25.2b). It seldom spreads into the neck or into the buttocks. The pain is usually unilateral and spreads over several segments. Exceptionally it is felt centrally at the spine, radiating bilaterally towards the sides.

Thoracic discoradicular interactions

A posterolateral impingement on the two upper thoracic roots produces pain felt in the arm (Fig. 25.3). If the T1 nerve root is involved, pain may be referred to the ulnar side of the forearm, whereas a T2 nerve root compression gives rise to pain felt over the inner aspect of the arm from the elbow to the axilla, at the anterior aspect of the upper thorax around the clavicle and at the posterior upper thorax around the scapular spine. Clinically the upper two thoracic segments belong to the cervical spine and are thus most easily examined with the cervical segments.

If the 3rd–12th root is compressed, pain spreads unilaterally as a band around the thorax, sometimes reaching anteriorly as far as the sternum (see Fig. 25.3).

The following landmarks may be helpful in determining which root is involved:

Bones

Osseous structures usually do not give rise to much in the way of referred pain; the pain remains typically local. Intense though localized pain is a warning sign and the following conditions should be considered:

Joints and ligaments

Ligaments and joints consistently obey the rules of referred pain, which means that the deeper the location of the affected structure and the closer its position to the midline, the more referred pain is to be expected. On the other hand, the further the lesion lies from the spinal axis and the more superficial it is, the more accurate will be its localization by the pain it provokes.

• Manubriosternal and sternoclavicular joints: as these are superficially located, the pain is felt locally.

• Costochondral and chondrosternal joints (Tietze’s syndrome and costochondritis): the patient is able to indicate the site of the lesion accurately.

• Intervertebral facet joints: these give rise to unilateral paravertebral pain, felt deeply and locally, but not going further lateral than the medial edge of the scapula. If several joints are affected at the same time, as may be the case in ankylosing spondylitis, the pain spreads more in a craniocaudal direction than mediolaterally; the opposite is true for a disc protrusion.

• Costovertebral and costotransverse joints: the pain is felt unilaterally between the vertebral column and the scapula.

• Anterior longitudinal ligament: when this ligament is affected, pain is usually located anteriorly behind the sternum.

• Posterior longitudinal ligament: involvement of this ligament causes pain in the back, felt centrally between the scapulae.

• Disorders of the costocoracoid fascia or the trapezoid and conoid ligaments (see online chapter Disorders of the inert structures): the pain is usually felt in the infraclavicular fossa.

Pain referred from visceral structures

Reproductive system

Disorders of the ovaries (T11–L1) may result in unilateral low abdominal pain, sometimes felt in the periumbilical area. Testicular problems (T11–L1) give rise to scrotal pain, sometimes radiating into the groin and to the side.

See Box 25.1 for a summary of referred pain in the thorax and abdomen.

History

In dealing with pain in the thorax or abdomen, the main goal of history taking is to differentiate between musculoskeletal and visceral problems. As already pointed out, a relationship between the patient’s symptoms and positions or activities does not necessarily exclude a visceral disorder, because in several visceral disorders the same relationship exists.

The history is kept simple and clear. Detailed information is elicited about pain, paraesthesia and the intake of anticoagulants or the presence of bleeding disorders.

Pain

What made the pain come on?

If the patient mentions an injury to the chest, a bony problem of the ribs, sternum or vertebra is likely. In a pathological fracture sudden pain may follow a very trivial movement.

When the pain has come on without trauma, it is of interest to know what the patient was doing at the time and in which position the body was held. Thoracic disc lesions are, just like lumbar ones, most often the result of a combined flexion–rotation movement. However, in disc lesions a history of such provocation cannot always be obtained, the patient stating that the pain started without any specific activity or posture.

Pain that came on after a forceful movement of trunk or arms – such as during sporting activities – may be from a muscular lesion.

Arthritis of the costovertebral, costotransverse or facet joints begins spontaneously. When it is the result of ankylosing spondylitis, pain and stiffness often occur in phases and are usually worst in the early morning.

Where was the pain at the beginning, where did it spread or shift to, and where is it now?

When the pain is felt between the scapulae above T6, a cervical disc problem is most likely. In such cases, clinical examination of the cervical spine should be done initially. If this is negative, clinical examination of the thorax follows.

A thoracic disc lesion usually gives rise to discomfort felt centrally or unilaterally in the posterior thorax. Here, as in the cervical spine, the pain may be felt centrally at first and then shift more to the side. A shifting pain suggests a shifting (disc) lesion.

A posterocentral protrusion interfering with the dura normally results in unilateral extrasegmental referred pain, usually felt in the anterior chest. However, it can also give rise to abdominal pain, discomfort in the groin and even lumbar pain. Sometimes bilateral extrasegmental pain is felt posteriorly and over several segments on both sides.

An acute ‘thoracic’ lumbago may exceptionally cause pain felt only at the sternum. This is a most misleading phenomenon, as it is not very logical to think of a disc problem in a patient with an acute sternal ache not preceded by any posterior thoracic pain. The possibility of such reference should always be borne in mind.

In posterolateral disc protrusions, pain is felt unilaterally and is referred to one segment only. It is mainly felt posteriorly and at the side but sometimes also anteriorly. This type of protrusion usually follows a posterocentral displacement that has subsequently shifted more laterally. In this case, root pain is preceded by a period of extrasegmental referred dural pain. In the rare event of a primary posterolateral protrusion, the disc fragment moves directly in a posterolateral direction. From the onset, pain is felt to the side, radiating segmentally anteriorly and not preceded by extrasegmental pain.

Pain which increases and expands all the time is from a ‘growing’ disorder, usually a tumour. Older patients who are symptom-free on first waking in the morning but complain of central posterior thoracic pain that starts after some hours and increases throughout the day, are likely to be suffering from posterior bulging of the whole content of an intervertebral disc as a consequence of excessive thoracic kyphosis.

Pain felt at the base of the neck is sometimes the result of a problem at the first costovertebral joint, the sternoclavicular joint or a fracture of the first rib.

Pain at the sternum is seldom the result of a musculoskeletal disorder. Most often it has a visceral origin. The same is true for pain felt in the abdomen: muscular lesions do exist but are rare. They usually give rise to well-localized pain.

Is the pain influenced by coughing, sneezing or deep inspiration?

When a Valsalva manœuvre or a deep breath provokes or increases the cervical or lumbar pain, it is generally interpreted as a dural symptom, from interference with the dura mater by a protruded disc or a tumour. In the thoracic area, it is not so simple. Many disorders other than problems of the dura may give rise to the same symptom. Deep inspiration may increase pain because of one of a number of visceral disorders or other musculoskeletal problems. Tumours of the respiratory tract, pleurisy, lung embolism, pneumothorax and even pericarditis can all give rise to pain increased by coughing or respiration. The same may be found in non-discal musculoskeletal problems of the ribs and sternum. Fractures and contusions of the ribs, a sprained intercostal muscle and a fracture of the sternum are all in the same class. Consequently, the influence of respiration on symptoms at the thoracic level is only regarded as a dural symptom once there is clinical certainty of disc protrusion. In thoracic disc protrusions it is more usual for deep inspiration, rather than a cough, to exacerbate the symptoms.

Paraesthesia

Protrusion of a disc in the thoracic region can produce pins and needles in two ways. First, it may be the result of compression of the spinal cord, which is characterized by extrasegmental pins and needles felt in both feet and typically increased or provoked by flexion of the neck. Cord compression and paraesthesia can also be caused by intra- and extraspinal tumours, intraspinal haemorrhage or a vertebral fracture. Second, paraesthesia can be stem from posterolateral protrusion compressing a nerve root. For example, pins and needles may be felt in the groin from compression of the T12 nerve root. In this event, the features are always localized and limited to the corresponding dermatome.

Both causes are rare, and when paraesthesia is present, other conditions, such as neuropathy due to generalized disorders (diabetes, pernicious anaemia and multiple sclerosis), must always been considered first.

Inspection and palpation

On inspection, the curvature of the thoracic spine is noted. Scoliosis and hyperkyphosis may be detected.

Functional examinationimage

Clinical routine differs significantly according to the level of the pain (Fig. 25.5). For a number of reasons, pain felt above the T6 level (mid-scapular) demands a preceding clinical examination of the cervical spine and the shoulder girdle. First, the upper two thoracic vertebrae, anatomically belonging to the thoracic spine but clinically part of the cervical spine, are tested in the clinical examination of the cervical spine. Second, it was demonstrated previously that cervical discodural interactions often provoke extrasegmentally referred pain in the upper half of the thorax. Third, numerous lesions of the thoracic apex and the shoulder girdle, although causing pain in the cranial aspect of the thorax, are only detected by proper examination of the cervical spine and/or the shoulder girdle: a tumour of the apex of the lung involving the T1 nerve root is only detected by cervical tests; neuritis of the suprascapular nerve causes pain in the supraspinatus fossa and is detected by a combined weakness of supra- and infraspinatus muscles. A fracture of the first rib provokes upper thoracic pain but the diagnosis can be missed if the examiner proceeds immediately with examination of the thoracic spine. For all these reasons, in patients with upper thoracic pain, a full cervical examination followed by examination of the shoulder girdle must be done first. Only when these are negative should a thorough examination of the thoracic spine follow.

If the patient has pain below T6, a cervical or shoulder girdle problem is unlikely and attention is immediately directed to the thoracic spine.

Functional examination of the thoracic spine consists of a large set of basic tests. The examination is performed with the patient standing, sitting and lying prone. During the procedure, dural, articular, muscular and cord signs are sought. Sometimes, when particular symptoms or signs from the basic examination warrant, the procedure is completed by specific accessory tests.

Standing

Dural tests

It is believed that deep inspiration, neck flexion and some scapular movements may indirectly stretch the dura mater.

Flexion of the neck (Fig. 25.6b)

The patient is asked to bend the head actively forward. This may increase the pain or provoke paraesthesia.

In thoracic spine problems, pain during active neck flexion is basically regarded as a dural sign because flexion stretches the dura mater from above. However, pain on neck flexion as the result of impaired dural mobility does not necessarily mean a disc lesion is present. Indeed, any kind of intraspinal space-occupying lesion that interferes with the dura, such as a tumour, may provoke pain on neck flexion. A problem with one of the posterior ligaments or posterior paravertebral muscles may also cause pain on neck flexion.

Sometimes a patient feels a sudden sensation on neck flexion, resembling an electrical discharge going down his back and occasionally even spreading towards both arms and legs. Sometimes it also occurs on extension of the neck. This is known as Lhermitte’s sign and was previously regarded as pathognomonic for disorders of the cord at the cervical level. In later reports it has been suggested that problems of the thoracic cord may cause the same sign. This can be caused by multiple sclerosis, a tumour of the cord, disc lesions, tuberculosis, spondylosis, arachnoiditis or radiation myelopathy.8

Neck flexion may also provoke or increase pins and needles. If these are felt in one or both lower limbs, this draws attention to compression of the spinal cord at the thoracic level, which is most commonly the result of a disc lesion or a tumour.

Active trunk movements

The patient is now asked to perform six active movements of the trunk. These involve both the thoracic and the lumbar spine. Differentiation is made by the level of the pain, as indicated by the patient, and on extension pressure at the end of the examination.

On flexion, extension and side flexion to both sides the range of movement is greatest in the lumbar spine, rather than the thorax. Rotation movements, in contrast, occur only slightly at the lumbar level and involve mostly the thoracic spine.

The movements performed are:

The patient performs these movements actively. Pain and limitation are noted. In structural scoliosis the associated hump persists and is accentuated on forward bending.

While performing rotations, the patient keeps the head in neutral position in relation to the shoulders, to avoid cervical rotation.

Conclusions from active trunk movements

In principle, the six movements described so far are articular. However, because they are performed actively, they involve some contractile structures as well. Passive and resisted movements (see below) provide the key in differential diagnosis between inert and contractile structures. After these tests, the examiner should know whether an articular pattern is present or not.

The articular pattern of the thoracic spine is an equal degree of pain and limitation of both side flexions and of both rotations, together with a larger limitation of extension and little or no limitation of anteflexion (Fig. 25.8). It resembles the pattern for the cervical spine. If this is found, a disorder of the entire segment of motion, such as in ankylosing spondylitis or osteoarthrosis, is present.

Any other combination of abnormal tests is regarded as a partial articular pattern (Fig. 25.9). Such a combination could be, for instance, pain on one rotation or one side flexion together with one rotation, or one side flexion and extension, or three, four or five of the six movements being positive in producing pain or limitation. As long as abnormal tests are present in a non-symmetrical way, the pattern is regarded as being partial articular.

In all types of disc lesion a partial articular pattern is expected. In the thoracic spine, a common finding is that only one out of the six articular movements is positive – usually one of the rotations. Differentiation must always be made from a facet joint lesion or a muscular lesion, in which a partial articular pattern is also found. In the latter, some of the resisted movements are more painful.

image Warning

When side flexion away from the painful side (Fig. 25.10) is the only painful and limited movement, this always indicates a severe extra-articular lesion such as a pulmonary or abdominal tumour or a spinal neurofibroma.

Sitting

The examination is now continued by looking at passive and resisted rotations to both sides, with the patient sitting. In the seated position Babinski’s reflex is also elicited.

Passive tests

The patient crosses both arms in front of the chest. The knees are held between the examiner’s legs to immobilize the pelvis. The patient’s trunk is now twisted towards the left and the right by the examiner. Pain, range of movement and end-feel are noted.

The normal end-feel is elastic. A hard end-feel is typical of ankylosing spondylitis or advanced arthrosis. Both an empty end-feel and muscle spasm suggest a severe disorder: neoplasm, fracture and infectious disorders.

Rarely, pain is present at half range, disappearing when rotation continues. This is known as a painful arc and was regarded by Cyriax9 as pathognomonic for a disc lesion when combined with a partial articular pattern.

At the end of both passive rotations the patient is asked to bend the head actively forwards. If this movement further increases the pain, it is regarded as a dural sign if the rest of the examination suggests that a disc lesion is present.

Resisted tests

In the same position as used for the passive tests, isometric contractions are done. The patient is asked to twist the trunk to the left (Fig. 25.12a) and to the right (Fig. 25.12b) while the examiner applies counterpressure at both shoulders, so that the patient is kept immobile. Pain and weakness are noted. Because muscular lesions do occasionally occur at this level, these tests must always be performed.

The results of both resisted and passive rotations are carefully compared. In a disc lesion, passive rotations are more painful than resisted ones. Given that resisted movements are more painful, a muscular problem is most likely, unless a psychogenic problem or a rib fracture is present. In both events, accessory tests should follow (see below).

Cord sign: plantar reflex

The examiner glides a relatively sharp instrument along the lateral aspect of the sole, starting at the heel and moving forwards and medially towards the big toe (Fig. 25.13). Normally the toes either do not move at all or they all uniformly go into flexion. This test is pathological if the patient spreads the toes apart and the big toe moves into extension. A positive test indicates interruption of the descending motor fibres. If there is the slightest doubt about interference with the spinal cord, a full neurological examination of the lower limbs must be carried out. This includes all reflexes in the lower limbs and abdomen, resisted movements of the thigh and leg musculature, control of coordination, testing for numbness and temperature sensitivity, and the straight leg raising test.

Accessory tests

To reach a diagnosis, the basic clinical examination normally suffices. In circumstances that remain unclear or when a muscular problem is suspected, accessory movements must be carried out.

Stretching the T1 nerve root

The patient is asked to lift the arm sideways from the horizontal. The hand is now put in the neck by flexing the elbow (Fig. 25.15). This movement stretches the T1 nerve root via the ulnar nerve, which may provoke pain between the scapulae or down the arm when the mobility of the T1 nerve root is impaired. The test is useful for differentiating between a problem of the cervical spine and one of the upper thorax which interferes with the dura or the T1 nerve root: if it is painful, a thoracic problem is more likely.

Resisted movements and extension of the trunk

To gain more information on a muscular lesion, the following resisted movements should be performed.

Extension of the trunk

This movement is performed in three different ways.

Testing the long thoracic nerve

The patient pushes against a wall with the arms stretched out horizontally in front (Fig. 25.19). If the medial edge of the scapula moves away from the thorax to produce a winged appearance, a disorder of the long thoracic nerve is present.

Oscillation of a rib

The examiner stands on the pain-free side and places one hand distally on the thorax, with the fifth metacarpal bone exactly on the suspected rib. The other hand rests with the pisiform bone on the contralateral transverse process of the corresponding vertebra (Fig. 25.20). Oscillations are now given by the hand resting on the rib. At the same time, the other hand is used to prevent rotation of the vertebra by pressing simultaneously on the transverse process. These oscillations influence mainly the costovertebral and costotransverse joints. When there is inflammation, pain will be provoked; when ankylosing spondylitis is present, the movement will be less elastic.

Neurological examination

A full neurological examination must be carried out when compression of the spinal cord or a neurological disorder is suspected.

The following accessory tests should be performed.

Full neurological examination of the lower limbs

This is described in Table 25.1.

Table 25.1

Full neurological examination of the lower limbs

Tests Nerve root
Inspection of gait  
Motor tests  
Resisted flexion of hip L2–L3
Resisted extension of knee L3
Resisted dorsiflexion of foot L4
Resisted extension of big toe L4–L5
Resisted eversion of foot L5–S1
Resisted flexion of knee S1–S2
Squeezing the buttocks S1–S2
Raising on tiptoe S1–S2
Reflexes  
Patellar reflex L3
Achilles tendon reflex S1
Sensitivity  
Temperature  
Numbness  

Palpation

If a muscular lesion is suspected, the affected structure should be palpated.

Palpation is also necessary to differentiate between a lesion of an intercostal muscle and a true rib problem.

In a disc lesion, cutaneous anaesthesia must always be checked. If present in the territory of one nerve root, a posterolateral protrusion is likely; bilateral numbness suggests compression of the spinal cord instead.

The clinical examination of the thoracic spine is summarized in Box 25.2.

Box 25.2   Summary of the clinical examination of the thoracic spine

History

Pain

Paraesthesia

Anticoagulant treatment and bleeding disorders

Inspection

Functional examination

Accessory tests

Technical investigations

Plain radiographs are useful in confirming osseous lesions and in the evaluation of degree and development of scoliosis.

During the last decades the use of computed tomography (CT) in combination with myelography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has greatly increased the ability to visualize thoracic spine disorders accurately. MRI is the best way to define the specific abnormality, as well as the effect on the adjacent spinal cord. CT after myelography may be useful as well, especially in those patients in whom there is involvement of the posterior ligamentous and osseous structures of the thoracic spinal canal.10

However, the superior resolution of the available imaging methods has also made the incidental detection of asymptomatic thoracic disc abnormalities more common.11 As with the lumbar and the cervical spine, it has become evident that the correlation between gross anatomical findings on MRI and clinical signs and symptoms detected by the clinician may be lacking. A significant proportion of the population has disc disease as depicted on imaging studies, yet many have no clinical findings at all.12,13 The relative frequency of asymptomatic thoracic herniated nucleus pulposus has been documented in several studies.14,15 Wood et al reviewed MRI studies of the thoracic spines of 90 asymptomatic individuals to determine the prevalence of abnormal anatomical findings: 66 (73%) had positive anatomical findings at one level or more, including herniation of a disc in 33 (37%), bulging of a disc in 48 (53%), an annular tear in 52 (58%), deformation of the spinal cord in 26 (29%) and Scheuermann endplate irregularities or kyphosis in 34 (38%).16

Awwad et al retrospectively reviewed postmyelography CT scans of 433 patients and identified 68 asymptomatic thoracic herniated discs. After comparing the imaging characteristics with a series of five symptomatic thoracic herniated discs, the authors were unable to identify any features that could reliably classify a herniated disc as asymptomatic or symptomatic.17

All these studies clearly demonstrate that thoracic disc herniations shown by MRI may not be related to patients’ symptoms. The diagnosis ‘symptomatic thoracic disc lesion’ is therefore primarily a clinical one.

References

1. Grieve, G. Modern Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1986.

2. Skubic, J, Kostuik, J. Thoracic pain syndromes and thoracic disc herniation. In: The Adult Spine. New York: Raven Press; 1991:1443–1461.

3. Bechgaard, P, Segmental thoracic pain in patients admitted to a medical department and a coronary unit. Acta Med Scand. 1981;644(Suppl):87–89. image

4. Edghar, MA, Nundy, S. Innervation of the spinal dura mater. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1966; 29:530–534.

5. Groen, GJ, Baljet, B, Drukker, J, The innervation of the spinal dura mater: anatomy and clinical implications. Acta Neurochir 1988; 99:39–46. image

6. Nadel, JA, Murray, JF, Mason, RJ. Textbook of Respiratory Medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005.

7. Pedersen, KV, Drewes, AM, Frimodt-Møller, PC, Osther, PJ, Visceral pain originating from the upper urinary tract. Urol Res. 2010;38(5):345–355. image

8. Gauthier-Smith, PC, L’Hermitte’s sign in subacute combined degeneration of the cord. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973; 36:861–863. image

9. Cyriax, J. Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, vol. 1, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions, 8th ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1982.

10. Rosenbloom, SA, Thoracic disc disease and stenosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991;29(4):765–775. image

11. Vanichkachorn, JS, Vaccaro, AR, Thoracic disc disease: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(3):159–169. image

12. Mink, JH, Deutsch, AL, Goldstein, TB, et al, Spinal imaging and intervention. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1998;9(2):343–380. image

13. Matsumoto, M, Okada, E, Ichihara, D, et al, Age-related changes of thoracic and cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(14):1359–1364. image

14. Martin, DS, Awwad, EE, Pittman, T, et al, Current imaging concepts of thoracic intervertebral disks. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1992; 1–2:109–181. image

15. Williams, MP, Cherryman, GR, Husband, JE, Significance of thoracic disc herniation demonstrated by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989;13(2):211–214. image

16. Wood, KB, Garvey, TA, Gundry, C, Heithoff, KBJ, Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine. Evaluation of asymptomatic individuals. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A(11):1631–1638. image

17. Awwad, EE, Martin, DS, Smith, KR, Jr., Baker, BK, Asymptomatic versus symptomatic herniated thoracic discs: their frequency and characteristics as detected by computed tomography after myelography. Neurosurgery. 1991;28(2):180–186. image

Share this: