Circulatory Assist Devices

Published on 07/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1102 times

Chapter 19 Circulatory Assist Devices

11 What does an arterial pressure tracing look like in a patient being assisted by an IABP?

The function of an IABP during diastole results in an upswing in the arterial pressure waveform during diastole (Fig. 19-1). The peak created by the IABP is known as the peak augmented diastolic pressure. The upstroke created by the IABP, if timing is correct, correlates with the dicrotic notch. When maximal augmentation by the IABP is achieved, the peak augmented diastolic pressure will be greater than the unassisted systolic pressure. In addition, both the assisted aortic end-diastolic pressure and the assisted systolic pressure should be less than their unassisted counterparts, given appropriate IABP function.

12 What are some common problems that may result in failure of the IABP to augment?

Failure to augment may be associated with inadequate inflated balloon size, as a result of either a balloon that is too small or an appropriately sized balloon that is being underfilled. A balloon that is misplaced too proximal or too distal in the aorta might not augment appropriately, as will a balloon inadvertently placed in a false passage (possibly created with insertion of the device). Inappropriate timing of inflation or deflation of the balloon, which may be either too early or too late, can impair augmentation (Table 19-1). Improper timing can often be corrected manually on the IABP console. Both tachycardia and bradycardia can result in failure to augment, as can certain arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. These rhythm abnormalities should be treated to allow for maximal effectiveness of the IABP.

Table 19-1 Results of Inappropriate IABP Timing

Timing issue Resulting problems
Early IABP inflation Early closure of aortic valve
Reduction in cardiac output
Increased oxygen consumption
Early IABP deflation Reduction in duration of diastolic augmentation
Late IABP inflation Reduction in duration of diastolic augmentation
Late IABP deflation Increased left ventricular afterload
  Increased oxygen consumption

25 What is the REMATCH study?

The REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) study refers to a landmark New England Journal of Medicine article from Columbia University in 2001, entitled “Long-term Use of a Left-Ventricular Assist Device for End-stage Heart Failure.” The article described a 3-year study in 129 patients with end-stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation and were randomly assigned to two groups: optimal medical management or LVAD therapy. Data showed significant increases in 1- and 2-year survival rates of the LVAD cohort over the medical therapy cohort (52% vs. 25% and 23% vs. 8%, respectively), as well as an improved quality of life.

Bibliography

1 Campbell L.J. Circulatory assist devices. Parsons P.E., Wiener-Kronish J.P. Critical Care Secrets, 4th ed, Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007.

2 Cohn L. Perioperative/intraoperative care. In Cardiac Surgery in the Adult, 3rd ed, New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008:507–533.

3 . Counterpulsation Applied: An Introduction to Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping. N.J. Mount Holly. Arrow International, Inc. 2005:1–158.

4 Donelli A., Jansen J.R., Hoeksel B., et al. Performance of a real-time dicrotic notch detection and prediction algorithm in arrhythmic human aortic pressure signals. J Clin Monit Comput. 2002;17:181–185.

5 Fitzsimons M.G., Ennis S., MacGillivray T. Devices for cardiac support. In: Sandberg W.S., Urman R., Ehrenfeld J. The MGH Textbook of Anesthetic Equipment. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010:247–262.

6 Laish-Farkash A., Hod H., Matetzky S., et al. Safety of intra-aortic balloon pump using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:99–103.

7 Mitter N., Sheinberg R. Update on ventricular assist devices. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:57–66.

8 Nicolosi A.C., Pagel P.S. Perioperative considerations in the patient with a left ventricular assist device. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:565–570.

9 Rose E.A., Gelijns A.C., Moskowitz A.J., et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–1443.

10 Roy S.K., Howard E.W., Panza J.A., et al. Clinical implications of thrombocytopenia among patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation in the coronary care unit. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33:30–35.

11 Slaughter M.S., Rogers J.G., Milano C.A., et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–2251.

12 Song X., Throckmorton A.L., Untaroiu A., et al. Axial flow blood pumps. ASAIO J. 2003;49:355–364.

13 Thunberg C.A., Gaitan B.D., Arabia F.A., et al. Ventricular assist devices today and tomorrow. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:656–680.

14 Trost J.C., Hillis L.D. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1391–1398.

15 Wilson S.R., Mudge G.H.Jr. Stewart GC, et al. Evaluation for ventricular assist device: selecting the appropriate candidate. Circulation. 2009;119:2225–2232.