Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Perspective
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Although prevalence estimates vary by measurement methods and by population studied, there is general agreement that COPD is underdiagnosed and under-reported. Regardless of the success of smoking cessation programs, smoking behavior in the past several decades and the delay of the appearance of symptoms in an aging population virtually guarantee an increase in prevalence, especially in developed nations. In addition, it is becoming increasingly clear that other risk factors besides cigarette smoking contribute significantly to the worldwide burden of COPD.1
It is estimated that COPD will be the fifth leading cause of lost disability-adjusted life years worldwide by 2030.2 The financial burden of COPD is enormous, accounting for billions of dollars every year for treatment and lost productivity. The majority of these costs are related to hospitalization for acute exacerbations.3 Despite its enormous effects, COPD has received relatively less attention from basic medical researchers and clinicians than other diseases. Large multinational collaborations, such as the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), sponsored jointly by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the World Health Organization, have reinvigorated the scientific and medical communities frustrated by the unrelenting progressive nature of COPD and its poor response to existing therapies.
The definition of COPD is imprecise and incorporates advances in our understanding of its underlying mechanisms and natural history. In their consensus statement, the GOLD collaborators define COPD as “a preventable and treatable disease with some significant extrapulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity in individual patients. Its pulmonary component is characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible.” They also state that “the airflow limitation is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases.”4 This definition reflects new data underscoring the systemic nature of the disease, as well as a deliberate optimism with respect to new prevention and treatment strategies. It specifically avoids mention of chronic bronchitis and emphysema, two entities that have been traditionally included in the definition of COPD. Chronic bronchitis, defined as the presence of cough and sputum production for at least 3 months in each of 2 consecutive years, can occur without airflow limitation. Emphysema, the destruction of alveoli, is a pathologic term, not one that pertains to clinical diagnosis. Unlike with many earlier definitions of COPD, the GOLD collaborators also specifically exclude asthma, which is reversible airflow limitation. Whether reversible airflow limitation is considered to be part of COPD itself or caused by coexisting asthma is of limited significance to the emergency physician, who will continue to make every attempt to identify and reverse airflow limitation.
As many as 50% of all acute COPD exacerbations are not reported to physicians. In addition, not all reported exacerbations necessitate hospitalization.5 Nonetheless, in 2007 almost 2% of all hospital admissions in the United States were directly attributed to COPD, and it was considered a contributory factor in another 9%. In patients older than 65 years, the percentage of all hospitalizations related to COPD approaches 20%.6 As the severity of the underlying disease progresses, so does the frequency of exacerbations.7 Moreover, in a subset of patients, incomplete recovery from acute exacerbations may reflect a contribution of exacerbations to the pathophysiology of relentless disease progression.
Principles of Disease
In the past several decades the discovery that chronic airway inflammation plays a central role in the pathophysiology of asthma has led to an important change in its management, specifically, the liberal use of corticosteroids for treating moderate to severe disease. Airway inflammation is also at the center of the pathophysiology of COPD, but the inflammatory process of COPD differs from that of asthma. In COPD, neutrophils, CD8+ lymphocytes, and macrophages predominate in bronchial washings, whereas in asthma the cellular response is characterized by the presence of eosinophils.8 The inflammatory mediators differ in COPD, and several mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor, leukotriene B4, and interleukin-8, are linked to the destruction of parenchyma. These differences in the nature of the inflammatory response in COPD may account for its relatively poor response to current anti-inflammatory treatment compared with asthma.
Cigarette smoking, the most significant risk factor for the development of COPD, exerts its effects at multiple points in the inflammatory cascade of COPD, negatively affecting both the protease to antiprotease and oxidant to antioxidant balances. Although smoking cessation slows the progression of the disease, it does not end the chronic inflammatory process within the airways, indicating that mechanisms independent of smoking are involved.9 Moreover, although a majority of COPD patients have a significant smoking history, only a minority of smokers ever develop airflow limitation. This suggests the importance of other factors, both environmental and genetic.1 Other identified causative factors include heavy occupational exposure to dusts and air pollution from indoor cooking, particularly in the developing world.10–12 Long-term passive exposure to tobacco smoke and urban air pollution also appear to be contributory.13,14 Although there is an association between early childhood lower respiratory tract infections and later development of COPD, a causal relationship is less certain.
Staging the Severity of Disease
Most classifications of disease severity are based on quantitative measurements of airflow limitation, such as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio. These indices are measured after any reversible airflow limitation is addressed by treatment with bronchodilator medications. The GOLD collaborators define four stages, beginning with a mild stage (stage I), when spirometry is abnormal but symptoms may not yet be apparent, and ending in very severe COPD (stage IV), when FEV1 is less than 30% of predicted (Table 74-1). Frequent exacerbations are usually seen when the FEV1 falls below 50% predicted (stages III and IV).4,15,16
Table 74-1
The GOLD Classification of Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Adapted from Rabe K, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al: Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176:532, 2007.
Acute Exacerbations
As with asthma, viral infection appears to be a frequent inciting agent in COPD exacerbations. Commonly implicated viruses include rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus, and influenza virus.17–19 Exacerbations associated with a viral cause are longer and more severe than those without an apparent inciting agent.18,20
Controversy remains regarding the role of bacterial pathogens in acute exacerbations of COPD, because the evidence for the role of bacteria in the pathogenesis remains indirect. Almost half of all exacerbations are associated with negative cultures for the typical respiratory pathogens, such as Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In addition, these organisms are recovered from the tracheobronchial tree of patients in their chronic, steady state, suggesting that bacteria may play a more important role in the pathogenesis of chronic COPD than in acute exacerbations.21 Although molecular typing shows that recent colonization with new serotypes of the common pathogens is associated with an exacerbation, there is a possibility that this relationship is not causal. Experimental evidence of specific immunologic responses to bacteria in exacerbations suggests, however, that they do play a significant role.22,23
Environmental factors, such as air pollution, are also implicated in COPD exacerbations. Indirect evidence for this relationship is largely derived from hospitalization rates for exacerbations during periods of increased air pollution.24 Finally, in as many as one third of all COPD exacerbations, no specific cause can be identified.
Clinical Features
COPD patients have a long premorbid course during which decreases in air flow indices can be measured in the absence of symptoms. Intermittent cough or shortness of breath on exertion may be easily misattributed to poor physical conditioning. Moreover, patients may remain asymptomatic for many years by gradually limiting their activities in proportion to their pulmonary reserve. After several years, a daily productive cough frequently develops, and periods of dyspnea, the cardinal symptom of airflow limitation, increase. The clinical progression of COPD is slow and insidious, with gradual decreases in airflow punctuated by increasingly frequent and debilitating exacerbations. Eventually the patient becomes truly incapacitated by dyspnea on minimal or no exertion. Profound muscle wasting and weight loss and the emergence of cor pulmonale or chronic ventilatory failure are characteristic of end-stage disease. Figure 74-1 depicts the progression of COPD over time.
Diagnostic Strategies
Pulse Oximetry, Arterial Blood Gas Analysis, and Waveform Capnography
ABG values, once a mainstay of ED evaluation of COPD patients, are of limited value in management of acute COPD episodes. Status and response to therapy often are monitored noninvasively by capnography and pulse oximetry. The presence of respiratory failure unresponsive to therapy (defined as PaO2 <40 mm Hg, PaCO2 >60 mm Hg, and pH <7.25 mm Hg) warrants consideration of admission to an intensive care unit, but clinical evaluation is much more important than any particular blood gas values.4 When baseline blood gas levels are not available, the usefulness of ABGs is even more limited, and interpretation should be based on the degree of acidemia present, which likely represents the extent of acute CO2 retention. ABGs should not be used to determine whether a patient requires intubation or noninvasive ventilatory support (NIVS). These decisions should rather be guided by the overall state of the patient, progression of fatigue, comorbid illness, and response to therapy. Patients with very poor blood gas values may do well without intubation or NIVS, but others with mildly disturbed values may require urgent airway intervention. Thus measurement of ABGs should not be performed routinely in the ED and should be undertaken only in response to specific circumstances, such as irregular or apparently unreliable pulse oximetry values or when a single baseline correlation with end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) is desired.
Waveform capnography represents the continuous quantitative measurement of exhaled CO2. It has emerged as a potential diagnostic and monitoring tool in patients with acute respiratory distress. The appearance of the waveform may assist the clinician in differentiating acute exacerbation of COPD from other causes of acute dyspnea, such as CHF. In patients with obstructed airways, the plateau phase of the waveform typically steepens in proportion to the severity of the obstruction, as depicted in Figure 74-2. Unfortunately, in patients with COPD, the actual end-tidal PCO2 measurements obtained from capnography do not correlate well with arterial PCO2 measurements, especially in more severe disease. Nonetheless, the patterns and trends from capnography may be helpful in guiding management and assessing response to therapy.25
Chest Radiography
In patients who are known to have COPD, the primary role of the chest radiograph is to determine whether there is an acute, treatable cause for clinical deterioration, especially pneumothorax or parenchymal consolidation (atelectasis secondary to mucous plugging, pneumonia, or obstruction by tumor). Otherwise, the chest radiograph is of limited use and may exhibit a range of chronic changes, depending on disease severity and the relative degree of the various pathologic processes. Findings may include hyperinflated lung fields, decreased vascular markings, and a small cardiac silhouette or, in contrast, normal inflation with increased vascular markings and an enlarged heart.26,27 In cor pulmonale, impingement on the retrosternal airspace by the enlarged right ventricle can be seen on the lateral film.
Electrocardiogram and Cardiac Monitoring
The classic descriptions of P pulmonale (peaked P waves in leads II, III, and aVF), low QRS voltage, clockwise rotation, and poor R wave progression in the precordial leads are interesting correlates of COPD but are both insensitive and nonspecific. The presence of electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria for RVH suggests established cor pulmonale. These findings, however, can be easily obscured on the ECG by other processes, and the absence of criteria for RVH cannot be relied on to rule out cor pulmonale.28