Chemotherapy of bacterial infections

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1480 times

Chapter 14 Chemotherapy of bacterial infections

Infection of the blood

Septicaemia

is a medical emergency that moves clinically from sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ‘SIRS’) via organ dysfunction (‘severe sepsis’) to septic shock as the associated mortality rates progress from 16% to 46%. In a shocked patient (i.e. with low blood pressure that does not promptly respond to circulatory volume enhancement) survival rates fall by over 7% for each hour of delay in commencing effective antibiotics. Urgent support of the circulation and other organs is necessary for survival, and rapid assessment by senior medical staff and early involvement of infection specialists have also been associated with an improved outcome and lowest antibiotic costs during treatment.

Usually, the infecting organism(s) is not known at the time of presentation and treatment must be instituted on the basis of a ‘best guess’ (i.e. ‘empirical therapy’). The clinical circumstances and knowledge of local resistance patterns may provide clues. Examples of suitable choices are given in the list below: patients who have been in hospital for some time before presenting with septicaemia need antibiotic regimens that provide more reliable cover for multiply resistant pathogens, and examples of these are given in square brackets:

Septicaemia accompanied by a spreading rash that does not blanch with pressure should be assumed to be meningococcal, and the patient must be referred to hospital urgently (after an immediate parenteral dose of benzylpenicillin): ceftriaxone.

Community-acquired pneumonia: co-amoxiclav + clarithromycin.

When septicaemia follows gastrointestinal or genital tract surgery, Escherichia coli (or other coliforms), anaerobic bacteria, e.g. Bacteroides, streptococci or enterococci are likely pathogens: piperacillin-tazobactam or gentamicin plus benzylpenicillin plus metronidazole [meropenem, plus vancomycin if MRSA is a risk].

Septicaemia related to urinary tract infection usually involves Escherichia coli (or other Gram-negative bacteria), enterococci: gentamicin plus benzylpenicillin or piperacillin-tazobactam alone [meropenem plus vancomycin].

Neonatal septicaemia is usually due to Lancefield Group B streptococcus or coliforms: benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin [vancomycin + ceftazidime].

Staphylococcal septicaemia may be suspected where there is an abscess, e.g. of bone or lung, or with acute infective endocarditis or infection of intravenous catheters: high-dose flucloxacillin [vancomycin]. Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia should be treated for 14 days to reduce the risk of metastatic infection: patients with prolonged bacteraemia or who fail to settle promptly should be considered for treatment as for staphylococcal endocarditis.

Severe cellulitis, bites and necrotising fasciitis accompanied by septicaemia should be treated with optimal cover for Lancefield Group A streptococcus, anaerobes and coliforms: piperacillin-tazobactam + clindamycin [meropenem + clindamycin].

Septicaemia in patients rendered neutropenic by cytotoxic drugs frequently involves coliforms and Pseudomonas spp. translocating to the circulation directly from the bowel, while coagulase-negative staphylococci also commonly arise from central venous catheter infection: piperacillin-tazobactam, sometimes plus vancomycin.

Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome occurs in circumstances that include healthy women using vaginal tampons, in abortion or childbirth, and occasionally with skin and soft tissue infection and after packing of body cavities, such as the nose. Flucloxacillin is used, and elimination of the source by removal of the tampon and drainage of abscesses is also important.

Antimicrobials are given i.v. initially, and their combination with optimal circulatory and respiratory support and glycaemic control, and administration of hydrocortisone and recombinant human activated protein C for severe cases, provides the best outcome.

Infection of paranasal sinuses and ears

Infection of the throat

Pharyngitis is usually viral but the more serious cases may be due to Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A) (always sensitive to benzylpenicillin), which cannot be differentiated clinically from virus infection with any certainty. Prevention of complications is more important than relief of the symptoms, which seldom last long and corticosteroids are much more effective than antibiotics at shortening the period of pain.

There is no general agreement as to whether chemotherapy should be employed in mild sporadic sore throat, and expert reviews reflect this diversity of opinion.1,2,3 The disease usually subsides in a few days, septic complications are uncommon and rheumatic fever rarely follows. It is reasonable to withhold penicillin unless streptococci are cultured or the patient develops a high fever: some primary care physicians take a throat swab and give the patient a WASP prescription for penicillin which is only filled if streptococci are isolated. Severe sporadic or epidemic sore throat is likely to be streptococcal and the risk of these complications is limited by phenoxymethylpenicillin by mouth (clarithromycin or an oral cephalosporin in the penicillin-allergic), given, ideally, for 10 days, although compliance is bad once the symptoms have subsided and 5 days should be the minimum objective. Azithromycin (500 mg daily p.o.) for 3 days is effective as long as the streptococci are susceptible, with improved compliance, and 5-day courses of oral cephalosporins are as effective as 10 days of penicillin. Do not use amoxicillin if the circumstances suggest pharyngitis due to infectious mononucleosis, as the patient is very likely to develop a rash (see p. 176). In a closed community, chemoprophylaxis of unaffected people to stop an epidemic may be considered, for instance with oral phenoxymethylpenicillin 125 mg 12-hourly.

In scarlet fever and erysipelas, the infection is invariably streptococcal (Group A), and benzylpenicillin should be used even in mild cases, to prevent rheumatic fever and nephritis.

Infection of the bronchi, lungs and pleura

Pneumonias

The clinical setting is a useful guide to the causal organism and hence to the ‘best guess’ early choice of antimicrobial. It is not possible reliably to differentiate between pneumonias caused by ‘typical’ and ‘atypical’ pathogens on clinical grounds alone and most experts advise initial cover for both types of pathogen in seriously ill patients. However, there is no strong evidence that adding ‘atypical’ cover to empirical parenteral treatment with a β-lactam antibiotic improves the outcome. Published guidelines often recommend hospital admission and parenteral and broader-spectrum therapy for the most severely affected patients as assessed by the ‘CURB-65’ score (one point is scored for each of Confusion, elevated serum Urea, Respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minute, low Blood pressure, and age of 65 or above). Delay of 4 hours or more in commencing effective antibiotics in the most seriously ill patients is associated with increased mortality.

Pneumonia in previously healthy people (community acquired)

Endocarditis

When there is suspicion, two or three blood cultures should be taken over a few hours and antimicrobial treatment commenced, to be adjusted later in the light of the results. Delay in treating only exposes the patient to the risk of grave cardiac damage or systemic embolism. Streptococci, enterococci and staphylococci are causal in 80% of cases, with viridans group streptococci having recently been overtaken by Staphylococcus aureus as the most common pathogens. In intravenous drug users, Staphylococcus aureus is particularly likely, although the potential list of pathogens is extensive in this group. Culture-negative endocarditis (in 8–10% of cases in contemporary practice) is usually due to previous antimicrobial therapy or to special culture requirements of the microbe; it is best regarded as being due to streptococci and treated accordingly.

Endocarditis on prosthetic valves presenting in the first few months after the operation usually involves Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci or Gram-negative rods. The infecting flora then becomes progressively more characteristic of native valve infections as time progresses.

Dose regimens

The following regimens are commonly recommended (the reader is referred to the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy treatment guidelines 2006; currently under review, the European Society of Cardiology (2009) or to other published references for detailed advice):

1. Initial (‘best guess’) treatment should comprise benzylpenicillin (7.2 g i.v. daily in six divided doses), plus gentamicin (1 mg/kg body-weight 8-hourly – synergy allows this dose of gentamicin and minimises risk of adverse effects). Regular serum gentamicin assay is vital: trough concentrations should be below 1 mg/L and peak concentrations 3–5 mg/L; if Staphylococcus aureus is suspected, high-dose flucloxacillin plus rifampicin should be used. Patients allergic to penicillin and those with intracardiac prostheses or suspected MRSA infection should receive vancomycin plus rifampicin plus gentamicin. Patients presenting acutely (suggesting infection with Staphylococcus aureus) should receive flucloxacillin (8–12 g/day in four to six divided doses) plus gentamicin.

2. When an organism is identified and its sensitivity determined:

Prophylaxis

Transient bacteraemia is provoked by dental procedures that induce gum bleeding, surgical incision of the skin, instrumentation of the urinary tract and parturition. However, even seemingly innocent activities such as brushing the teeth result in bacteraemia and are lifelong risks, whereas medical interventions are usually single. Adding this to the fact that even single antibiotic doses carry inevitable risks and the evidence base for their efficacy is lacking, expert working parties have re-evaluated the traditional wisdom of advocating prophylactic antibiotics for many procedures in patients with acquired or congenital heart defects.

If used, the drugs are given as a short course in high dose at the time of the procedure to coincide with the bacteraemia and avoid emergence of resistant organisms. The following recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis are based on those published in 2006 by the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (see Guide to further reading); they are abbreviated and not every contingency is covered. The guidelines are based on a careful assessment of the risks of bacteraemia and reported cases of endocarditis after each procedure. Other national working parties may recommend different measures, and the physician should consult special sources and their local microbiologist, and exercise a clinical judgement that relates to individual circumstances. All oral drugs should be taken under supervision.

Adults who are not allergic to penicillins and who have not taken penicillin more than once in the previous month (including those with a prosthetic valve) require amoxicillin 3 g by mouth 1 h before the procedure.

Patients allergic to penicillins or who have taken penicillin more than once in the previous month should receive clindamycin 600 mg by mouth 1 h before the procedure. Azithromycin 500 mg is an alternative, available as a suspension for those unable to swallow capsules. If parenteral prophylaxis is required, use amoxicillin 1 g i.v. or clindamycin 300 mg i.v.

Patients having a series of separate procedures all requiring prophylaxis should receive amoxicillin or clindamycin alternately. Where practicable, a preoperative mouthwash of the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) should be used to reduce oral bacterial numbers.

Consult the guideline publication (above) for prophylactic regimens for children and other procedures, including instrumentation of the urogenital or gastrointestinal tracts, which are now recognised to carry a greater risk of endocarditis than dental procedures.

Meningitis

Speed of initiating treatment and accurate bacteriological diagnosis are the major factors determining the fate of the patient, especially with invasive meningococcal disease where fulminant meningococcal septicaemia still carries a 20–50% mortality rate (and supporting the circulation in the intensive care unit is as important a determinant of outcome as the rapid commencement of antibiotic therapy). With suspected meningococcal disease, unless the patient has a history of penicillin anaphylaxis, benzylpenicillin should be started by the general practitioner before transfer to hospital; the benefit of rapid treatment outweighs the reduced chance of identifying the causative organism. Molecular diagnostic methods such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for bacterial DNA in CSF or blood enable rapid diagnosis even when the causative organisms have been destroyed by antibiotics.

Drugs must be given i.v. in high dose

The regimens below provide the recommended therapy, with alternatives for patients allergic to first choices, and septic shock requires appropriate management (see p. 191). Intrathecal therapy is now considered unnecessary (except for neurosurgical infections in association with indwelling CSF drains and shunts) and can be dangerous, e.g. encephalopathy with penicillin.

Initial therapy

Initial therapy should be sufficient to kill all pathogens, which are likely to be:

Subsequent therapy

Necessarily, i.v. administration should continue until the patient can take drugs by mouth, but whether or when continuation therapy should be oral or i.v. is a matter of debate. Antimicrobials (except aminoglycosides) enter well into the CSF when the meninges are inflamed; relapse may be due to restoration of the blood–CSF barrier as inflammation reduces. The following are recommended (adult doses).

Infection of the intestines

(For Helicobacter pylori, see p. 533)

Both wit and truth are contained in the aphorism that ‘travel broadens the mind but opens the bowels’. Antimicrobial therapy should be reserved for specific conditions with identified pathogens where benefit has been shown; acute diarrhoea can be caused by bacterial toxins in food, dietary indiscretions, anxiety and by drugs as well as by infection. Even if diarrhoea is infective, it may be due to viruses; or, if bacterial, antimicrobial agents may not reduce the duration of symptoms and may aggravate the condition by permitting opportunistic infection and encouraging Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Maintaining water and electrolyte balance either orally or by i.v. infusion with a glucose–electrolyte solution, and administration of an antimotility drug (except in small children, and those with with bloody, dysenteric stools, and in Clostridium difficile infection), are the mainstays of therapy in such cases (see Oral rehydration therapy, p. 537). Some specific intestinal infections do benefit from chemotherapy:

A carrier state

develops in a few individuals who have no symptoms of disease but who can infect others.4 Organisms reside in the biliary or urinary tracts. Ciprofloxacin in high dose by mouth for 3–6 months may be successful for what can be a very difficult problem, requiring investigation for urinary tract abnormalities or even cholecystectomy.

Infection of the urinary tract

(Excluding sexually transmitted infections)

Common pathogens include Escherichia coli (commonest in all patient groups), Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., other Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

Patients with abnormal urinary tracts, e.g. renal stones, prostatic hypertrophy, indwelling urinary catheters, are likely to be infected with a more varied and antimicrobial-resistant microbial flora. Identification of the causative organism and of its sensitivity to drugs is important because of the range of organisms and the prevalence of resistant strains.

For infection of the lower urinary tract a low dose may be effective, as many antimicrobials are concentrated in the urine. Infections of the substance of the kidney require the doses needed for any systemic infection. A large urine volume (over 1.5 L/day) and frequent micturition hasten elimination of infection.

Drug treatment of urinary tract infection falls into several categories:

Special drugs for urinary tract infections

General antimicrobials used for urinary tract infections are described elsewhere. A few agents find use solely for infection of the urinary tract:

Genital tract infections

A general account of orthodox literature is given below, but treatment is increasingly the prerogative of specialists, who, as is so often the case, get the best results. Interested readers are referred to specialist texts. Sexually transmitted infections are commonly multiple. Tracing and screening of contacts plays a vital part in controlling spread and reducing re-infection. Recommended treatment regimens vary to some extent among countries, and this is in response to differences in antimicrobial susceptibility of the relevant pathogens and availability of antimicrobial agents.

Syphilis

Primary and secondary syphilis are effectively treated by a single dose of 2.4 million units (MU) benzathine penicillin i.m. Doxycycline or erythromycin orally for 2 weeks may be used for penicillin-allergic patients, and a single oral dose of 2 g azithromycin appears to have equivalent efficacy. Treponema pallidum is invariably sensitive to penicillin but macrolide resistance has been reported worldwide rarely except in infections in men who have sex with men.

Tertiary syphilis responds to doxycycline for 28 days or to 3 weekly doses of 2.4 MU benzathine penicillin i.m. Neurosyphilis requires higher serum concentrations for cure and should be treated with procaine penicillin 2.4 megaunits i.m. once daily for 17 days with oral probenecid 500 mg four times a day.

Congenital syphilis in the newborn should be treated with benzylpenicillin for 10 days at least. Some advocate that a pregnant woman with syphilis should be treated as for primary syphilis in each pregnancy, in order to avoid all danger to children. Therapy is best given between the third and sixth month, as there may be a risk of abortion if it is given earlier.

Infection of bones and joints

Causative bacteria of osteomyelitis may arrive via the bloodstream or be implanted directly (through a compound fracture, chronic local infection of local tissue, or surgical operation). Staphylococcus aureus is the commonest isolate in all patient groups, and Salmonella species in the tropics. Chronic osteomyelitis of the lower limbs (especially when underlying chronic skin infection in the elderly) frequently involves obligate anaerobes (such as Bacteroides spp.) and coliforms.

Strenuous efforts should be made to obtain bone for culture because superficial and sinus cultures are poorly predictive of the underlying flora, and prolonged therapy is required for chronic osteomyelitis (usually 6–8 weeks, sometimes longer). Surgical removal of dead bone improves the outcome of chronic osteomyelitis.

Definitive therapy is guided by the results of culture but commonly used regimens include co-amoxiclav (community-acquired cases in adults), flucloxacillin with or without fusidic acid (for Staphylococcus aureus), cefotaxime or co-amoxiclav (in children), and ciprofloxacin (for coliforms). Short courses of therapy (3–6 weeks) may suffice for acute osteomyelitis, but vertebral body osteomyelitis requires at least 8 weeks’ treatment.

Mycobacterial infections

Pulmonary tuberculosis

Nearly one-third of the world’s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and it is the second leading cause of death due to an identified pathogen, after HIV infection. Drug therapy has transformed tuberculosis from a disabling and often fatal disease into one in which almost 100% cure is obtainable, although the recent emergence of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) strains and their interaction with HIV infection has disturbed this optimistic view. Chemotherapy was formerly protracted, but a better understanding of the mode of action of antituberculosis drugs and of effective immune reconstitution in HIV infection has allowed the development of shorter-course regimens.

Principles of antituberculosis therapy

Most contemporary regimens employ an initial intensive phase with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide with or without ethambutol, to reduce the bacterial load as rapidly as possible (usually for 2 months), followed by a continuation phase with rifampicin and isoniazid given for at least 4 months (Fig. 14.1).

All short-course regimens include isoniazid, pyrazinamide and rifampicin. After extensive clinical trials, the following have been found satisfactory:

All of the regimens are highly effective, with relapse rates of 1–2% in those who continue for 6 months; even if patients default after, say, 4 months, tuberculosis can be expected to recur in only 10–15%. Drug resistance seldom develops with any of these regimens.

Compliance is often a concern with multiple drug therapy given for long periods, especially in the developing world, and (surprisingly) DOT did improve relapse rates in many trials. Fixed-dose combination therapy is assumed to improve compliance; however, bio-availability of rifampicin remains a matter of concern in fixed-dose combinations; some commonly used fixed-dose combinations include Rifater (rifampicin, isoniazid plus pyrazinamide), and Rifinah or Rimactazid (rifampicin plus isoniazid). In all cases, effective control of tuberculosis in a population requires optimal therapy of index cases combined with careful screening and case finding among their contacts.

Special problems

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis

The principles of treatment, i.e. multiple therapy and prolonged follow-up, are the same as for pulmonary tuberculosis (see Fig. 14.1). Many chronic tuberculosis lesions may be relatively inaccessible to drugs as a result of avascularity, so treatment frequently has to be prolonged and dosage high, especially if damaged tissue cannot be removed by surgery, e.g. tuberculosis of bones.

Bone and joint tuberculosis

Six to nine months drug regimens containing rifampicin are effective (see Fig. 14.1). Surgery is indicated when chemotherapy fails with evidence of ongoing infection and for relief of cord compression with persistent or recurrent neurological deficits or instability of the spine.

Tuberculosis in the immunocompromised

Such patients require special measures because they may be infected more readily when exposed; their infections usually involve large numbers of tubercle bacilli (multibacillary disease), and patients with AIDS are more likely to be infected with multiply antibiotic-resistant strains. While treating patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis, antituberculosis treatment (ATT) is started first and antiretroviral treatment (ART) is started subsequently. ART-naïve HIV/AIDS patients should be started on ART between 2 weeks and 2 months after anti-TB drugs, depending on CD4 cell counts. Patients already on ART require some modification in treatment; efavirenz should be used in place of nevirapine. Rifabutin should be preferred over rifampicin while using protease inhibitors. Patients while on ART and ATT may develop IRIS (within 3 months of treatment). In this paradoxical reaction, patients initially show some improvement and subsequently reveal either aggravation of existing lesions or appearance of fresh lesions. Development of IRIS does not require stopping of ART and usually non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are sufficient. Drug-resistant TB should be ruled out. Usually at least four drugs are started, and patients are isolated until bacteriological results have been obtained and they have shown clinical improvement. If infections are proved to involve antibiotic-susceptible mycobacteria, therapy can continue with a conventional 6-month regimen with careful follow-up. Particular problems may occur with multiple drug interactions during antituberculous treatment of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.

Antituberculosis drugs

Isoniazid

Isoniazid (INH, INAH, isonicotinic acid hydrazide) is selectively effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis because it prevents the synthesis of components that are unique to mycobacterial cell walls. Hence it is bactericidal against actively multiplying bacilli (whether within macrophages or at extracellular sites) but is bacteriostatic against non-dividing bacilli; it has little or no activity against other bacteria. Isoniazid is well absorbed from the alimentary tract and is distributed throughout the body water, including CSF. It should always be given in cases where there is special risk of meningitis (miliary tuberculosis and primary infection). Isoniazid is inactivated by conjugation with an acetyl group and the rate of the reaction is bimodally distributed. The t½ is 1 h in fast and 4 h in slow acetylators; fast acetylators achieve less than half the steady-state plasma concentration of slow acetylators but standard oral doses (300 mg/day) on daily regimens give adequate tuberculocidal concentrations in both groups.

Adverse effects

Isoniazid is in general well tolerated. The most severe adverse effect is liver damage, ranging from a moderate rise in hepatic enzymes to severe hepatitis and death. Liver histology in isoniazid hepatitis is indistinguishable from acute viral hepatitis. It is probably caused by a chemically reactive metabolite(s), e.g. acetylhydrazine. Most cases are in patients aged over 35 years, and develop within the first 8 weeks of therapy; liver function should be monitored monthly during this period at least. High-dose isoniazid (16–20 mg/kg/day) may be useful in DR-TB.

Isoniazid is a structural analogue of pyridoxine and accelerates its excretion, the principal result of which is peripheral neuropathy with numbness and tingling of the feet, motor involvement being less common. Neuropathy is more frequent in slow acetylators, malnourished people, the elderly and those with HIV infection, liver disease, diabetes mellitus and alcoholism, chronic renal failure, malnutrition, pregnant and breast-feeding women. Such patients should receive pyridoxine 10 mg/day by mouth, which prevents neuropathy and does not interfere with the therapeutic effect; some prefer simply to give pyridoxine to all patients. Other adverse effects include mental disturbances, incoordination, optic neuritis and convulsions.

Isoniazid inhibits the metabolism of phenytoin, carbamazepine and ethosuximide, increasing their effect. Ideally, blood levels of these drugs should be monitored (therapeutic drug monitoring).

Rifampicin

Rifampicin has bactericidal activity against the tubercle bacillus, comparable to that of isoniazid. It is also used in leprosy.

It acts by inhibiting RNA synthesis, bacteria being sensitive to this effect at much lower concentrations than mammalian cells; it is particularly effective against mycobacteria that lie semi-dormant within cells. Rifampicin has a wide range of antimicrobial activity. Other uses include leprosy, severe legionnaires’ disease (with erythromycin or ciprofloxacin), the chemoprophylaxis of meningococcal meningitis, and severe staphylococcal infection (with flucloxacillin or vancomycin).

Rifampicin is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. It penetrates most tissues. Entry into the CSF when meninges are inflamed is sufficient to maintain therapeutic concentrations at normal oral doses but transfer is reduced as inflammation subsides in 1–2 months.

Enterohepatic recycling takes place, and eventually about 60% of a single dose is eliminated in the faeces; urinary excretion of unchanged drug also occurs. The t½ is 4 h after initial doses, but shortens on repeated dosing because rifampicin is a very effective enzyme inducer and increases its own metabolism (as well as that of several other drugs; see below).

Rifaximin

is a semi-synthetic rifamycin that is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (less than 0.4%). Because of the very high faecal concentrations achieved after a 400-mg oral dose (about 8000 micrograms/g faeces), it has broad activity against the common bacterial causes of travellers’ diarrhoea and has proved as effective as an oral quinolone or azithromycin (see p. 537), and adverse effects are rare. Efficacy of rifaximin treatment in acute hepatic encephalopathy is well documented. Its protective effect against breakthrough episodes of hepatic encephalopathy along with lactulose on a long-term basis is being evaluated, as rifaximin has a low risk of inducing bacterial resistance.

Pyrazinamide

Pyrazinamide is a derivative of nicotinamide and is included in first-choice combination regimens because of its particular ability to kill intracellular persisters, i.e. mycobacteria that are dividing or semi-dormant, often within cells. Its action is dependent on the activity of intrabacterial pyrazinamidase, which converts pyrazinamide to the active pyrazinoic acid; this enzyme is most effective in an acidic environment such as the interior of cells. In drug-sensitive tuberculosis it should not be administered beyond 2 months. It is inactive against Mycobacterium bovis. Pyrazinamide is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and metabolised in the liver, very little unchanged drug appearing in the urine (t½ 9 h). CSF concentrations are almost identical to those in the blood. Pyrazinamide is safe to use in pregnancy.

Ethambutol

Ethambutol, being bacteriostatic, is used in conjunction with other antituberculous drugs to delay or prevent the emergence of resistant bacilli. It is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and effective concentrations occur in most body tissues including the lung; in tuberculous meningitis, sufficient may reach the CSF to inhibit mycobacterial growth but insignificant amounts enter CSF if the meninges are not inflamed. Excretion is mainly by the kidney, by tubular secretion as well as by glomerular filtration (t½ 4 h); the dose should be reduced when renal function is impaired.

Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis

Among the first-line antituberculosis drugs, rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide are potentially hepatotoxic drugs. Additionally, rifampicin can cause asymptomatic jaundice without evidence of hepatitis. Rifampicin rarely causes hepatitis when administered alone and rifampicin and isoniazid are ~ 3 times less toxic in the absence of pyrazinamide. It is essential to rule out acute viral hepatitis by performing markers for viral hepatitis before diagnosing antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis in developing nations. Drug-induced hepatitis can be life-threatening if drugs are continued despite its occurrence. All hepatotoxic drugs should be immediately stopped until complete biochemical recovery occurs. In the interim period, ethambutol, streptomycin and one of the fluoroquinolones should be administered. The best approach to reintroducing antituberculosis drugs is still debatable. The approach could be sequential or simultaneous. Some advocate reintroduction of all three drugs one by one as it allows identification of the culprit drug, while others prefer to use rifampicin first followed by isoniazid and if the patient tolerates both drugs avoid pyrazinamide.

Second-line antituberculosis drugs

Leprosy

Effective treatment of leprosy is complex and requires much experience to obtain the best results. Problems of resistant leprosy now require that multiple drug therapy be used and involve:

Dapsone

is a bacteriostatic sulphone (related to sulphonamides, acting by the same mechanism; see p. 187). It has long been the standard drug for all forms of leprosy. Irregular and inadequate duration of treatment with a single drug has allowed the emergence of primary and secondary resistance to become a major problem. Dapsone is also used to treat dermatitis herpetiformis and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and (with pyrimethamine) for malaria prophylaxis. The t½ is 27 h. Adverse effects range from gastrointestinal symptoms to agranulocytosis, haemolytic anaemia and generalised allergic reactions that include exfoliative dermatitis.

Other antileprotics

include ethionamide and prothionamide. Thalidomide (see p. 253), despite its notorious past, still finds a use with corticosteroid in the control of allergic lepromatous reactions.

Other bacterial infections

Health-care-associated infections (HCAIs)

comprising ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical wound infection, intravenous catheter-associated bacteraemia, meningitis following neurosurgery, and infection of prosthetic devices such as joint replacements and heart valves may involve conventional pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Lancefield Group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus, but a number of antibiotic-resistant pathogens are also commonly involved. These isolates can pose difficult therapeutic problems, especially because the infections often present in patients with multiple pre-existing pathologies, including liver and renal impairment. The causative bacteria include MRSA and multiply resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, ESBL-producing coliforms (see p. 199), and a number of normally weakly pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter spp. These bacteria can be resistant to all conventional antimicrobial agents, and discussion with a microbiologist or infectious diseases physician is recommended before treatment is attempted. A number of unusual combinations of antibiotics have been recommended and previously outdated agents have been resurrected for treatment of infections with these pathogens: for example, colistin.

Guide to further reading

Algorithm for the early management of suspected bacterial meningitis and meningococcal septicaemia in immunocompetent adults Available online at: http://www.meningitis.org/health-professionals/hospital-protocols-adults (accessed November 2011)

Annane D., Bellissant E., Cavaillon J.M. Septic shock. Lancet. 2005;365:63–76.

Anon. Managing bites from humans and other mammals. Drug Ther. Bull.. 2004;42:67–71.

Anon. Cranberry and urinary tract infection. Drug Ther. Bull. 2005;43:17–19.

Anon. Managing acute sinusitis. Drug Ther. Bull.. 2009;47:26–30.

Avni T., Levcovich A., Ad-El D.D., et al, Prophylactic antibiotics for burns patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Available online at:. Br. Med. J. 2010;340:c241. http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c241.full.pdf (accessed November 2011)

Bhan M.K., Bahl R., Bhatnagar S. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Lancet. 2005;366:749–762.

Bharti A.R., Nally J.E., Ricaldi J.N., et al. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect. Dis.. 2003;3(12):757–771.

British Association of Sexual Health and HIV, United Kingdom National Guideline for the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Available online at: http://www.bashh.org/documents/118/118.pdf (accessed November 2011)

recommendations for treatment of infective endocarditis in the UKBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Available online at:. 2006. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dkh474v1 (accessed November 2011)

guidelines on management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and in children updatedBritish Thoracic Society. Available online at:. 2009. http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/guidelines/pneumonia-guidelines.aspx (accessed November 2011)

Campion E.W. Liberty and the control of tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med.. 1999;340(5):385–386.

Chambers H.F., Moellering R.C., Kamitsuka P. Clinical decisions: management of skin and soft tissue infection. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2008;359(10):1063–1066.

Daum R.S. Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2007;357(4):380–390.

Donovan B. Sexually transmissible infections other than HIV. Lancet. 2004;363:545–556.

DuPont H.L. Bacterial diarrhoea. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2009;361(16):1560–1569.

Dye C. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2006;367:938–940.

French P. Syphilis. Br. Med. J.. 2007;334:143–147.

Gould F.K., Elliott T.S., Foweraker J., et al. Guidelines for the prevention of endocarditis: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.. 2006;57(6):1035–1042.

Habib G., Hoen B., Tornos P., et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis. Eur. Heart J.. 2009;30:2369–2413.

Hasham S., Matteucci P., Stanley P.R.W., Hart N.B. Necrotising fasciitis. Br. Med. J.. 2005;330:830–833.

Health Protection Agency, Clostridium difficile: how to deal with the problem Available online at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1232006607827 (accessed November 2011)

Health Protection Agency. guidance on investigating and treating a wide range of infectious illnesses in primary care. Available online at: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1279888711402 (accessed November 2011)

Hill D.R., Ryan E.T. Management of travellers’ diarrhoea. Br. Med. J.. 2008;337:863–867.

Lazzerini M. Zinc supplements for severe cholera. Br. Med. J.. 2008;336:227–228.

Lew D.P., Waldvogel F.A. Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 2004;364:369–379.

Mathews C.J., Weston V.C., Jones A., et al. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet. 2010;375:846–855.

Matthews P.C., Berendt A.R., McNally M.A., Byren I. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection. Br. Med. J.. 2009;338:1378–1383.

McColl K.E.L. Helicobacter pylori infection. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2010;362:1597–1604.

Morgan M. Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine leukocidin and necrotizing pneumonia. Br. Med. J.. 2005;331:793–794.

Munoz-Price L.S., Weinstein R.A. Acinetobacter infection. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2008;358:1271–1280.

Newland A., Provan D., Myint S. Preventing severe infection after splenectomy. Br. Med. J.. 2005;331:417–418.

Quagliarello V. Adjunctive steroids for tuberculous meningitis – more evidence, more questions. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2004;351(17):1792–1794.

Rudan I., Campbell H. The deadly toll of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae type b. Lancet. 2009;374:854–856.

Ryan E.T., Wilson M.E., Kain K.C. Illness after international travel. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2002;347(7):505–516.

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infection in adults: a national clinical guideline. Available online at:. 2006. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign88.pdf (accessed November 2011)

Singer A.J., Dagum A.B. Current management of acute cutaneous wounds. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2008;359(10):1037–1046.

Spiro D.M., Tay K.Y., Arnold D.H., et al. Wait-and-see prescription for the treatment of acute otitis media: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc.. 2006;296:1235–1241.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Available online at: http://www.survivingsepsis.org/ (accessed November 2011)

Swartz M.N. Bacterial meningitis – a view of the past 90 years. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2004;351(18):1826–1828.

Theilen U., Wilson L., Wilson G., et al. Management of invasive meningococcal disease in children and young people: summary of SIGN guidelines. Br. Med. J.. 2008;336:1367–1370.

Thwaites G., Fisher M., Hemingway C., et al. British Infection Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis of the central nervous system in adults and children. J. Infect.. 2009;59:167–187.

van de Beek D., de Gans J., Tunkel A.R., Wijdicks E.F. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2006;354:44–53.

Whitty C.J.M. Erasmus, syphilis, and the abuse of stigma. Lancet. 1999;354:2147–2148.

World Health Organization. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. World Health Organization, Geneva: Emergency updated edition; 2008.

Wormser G.P. Early Lyme disease. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2006;354(26):2794–2801.

Share this: