Chemical and Nuclear Agents

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1295 times

137 Chemical and Nuclear Agents

Epidemiology

Tens of thousands of chemicals are manufactured, transported, and used every day. The 1984 Bhopal, India, disaster revealed the dangers posed by chemical agents. A 2008 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services database of 14 states reported more than 15,000 chemical-related events and over 4500 casualties.1 Since World War I, chemical agents have also been used intentionally on civilian and military personnel, most recently in Japan in 1994-1995, in Russia in 2002, and in Iraq in 2007. Of the 13 categories of chemical agents recognized by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the four principal categories are nerve, vesicant, blood, and pulmonary agents2 (Box 137.1).

Detonation of an atomic bomb over Hiroshima, Japan, in 1945 heralded the evolution of a new hazardous agent, radioactive material. Showcased by the 1987 accidental exposure of cesium 137 in Goiânia, Brazil, the threat from radiologic material has continued to increase with the proliferation of medical devices and radiation therapy. Though reduced by the end of the Cold War, the threat from nuclear agents continues to persist in light of the accidents at Chernobyl, Ukraine, in 1986 and Tokaimura, Japan, in 1997, as well as the acknowledgment that dozens of nuclear devices are missing.

Management of casualties from chemical and radioactive agents can be complicated by the types of agents and exposure, in addition to specialized logistic, safety, and security issues. Emergency physicians (EPs) must be familiar with the basic principles of managing contaminated patients and initial treatment of the principal chemical and radioactive agents.

Basic Principles of Managing Contaminated Patients

Management of casualties from chemical and radioactive agents can be complicated by one or more factors, such as the number of patients, type of agent or agents involved, severity of the exposure, and the availability of pharmaceutical and human resources. A current and accurate hazard vulnerability analysis is essential for an optimal response to a specific identified hazard. However, because no facility can prepare for every possible factor and scenario, adherence to several basic principles may facilitate effective management of contaminated patients.

Decontamination

Decontamination should take place immediately, before initial treatment and evacuation of exposed patients. Although decontamination is usually completed at the scene before transportation, exposed and potentially contaminated patients may go on their own to nearby health care facilities.9 In addition to requiring primary decontamination and triage, these patients may secondarily contaminate existing patients and medical personnel and thus create additional casualties and diminish the response by the affected facility.7,9,10

Removal of contaminated clothing can eliminate 70% to 90% of HAZMAT.11,12 Once completed, patients should shower—or be showered if incapacitated—with copious amounts of tepid water. Several adjuncts, such as hypoallergenic liquid soap, may be helpful. Other adjuncts, including hard brushes and dilute additives such as bleach, are unlikely to provide additional benefit and, in some scenarios, could be harmful. Contaminated clothing and special items such as valuables and firearms should be labeled and securely contained to prevent accidental or continued secondary contamination, as well as for possible forensic analysis during a HAZMAT or criminal investigation.1216

Chemical Agents

Nerve Agents

Vesicant Agents

Blood Agents

Radiologic and Nuclear Agents

Pathophysiology

Radiation, regardless of type, causes injury through the production of charged water molecules and ionization of DNA. Because of its cellular effects, radiation can affect every organ, especially the hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, and central nervous systems.

Irradiation and external contamination by a radiologic agent may occur as a result of the surreptitious placement of a radiation emission device or detonation of a dirty bomb.33,34 A dirty bomb involves the use of conventional explosives to disperse radioactive material, such as iodine 131. After decontamination, treatment of blast injuries should precede treatment of radiologic injuries because immediate death from the radiation is unlikely35,36 (Table 137.2). If free of particulate matter and shrapnel, patients are unlikely to pose a significant threat to other patients and medical personnel.

Table 137.2 Types of Blast Injuries

TYPE MECHANISM EXAMPLES/EFFECTS
Primary Direct pressurization Rupture of tympanic membranes, lungs, viscera
Secondary Projectiles Penetrating trauma from fragments
Tertiary Secondary trauma Structural collapse, being thrown by the blast wind
Quaternary Other Burns, radiation, hazardous materials

From DePalma RG, Burris DG, Champion HR, et al. Blast injuries. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1335–42; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services radiation emergency medical management. Available at http://www.remm.nlm.gov/nuclearexplosion.htm.

Irradiation and external contamination by a nuclear agent may occur during transportation of HAZMAT or a nuclear reactor accident. Though an unlikely scenario, detonation of a nuclear device would involve catastrophic levels of radiation.

References

1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry biennial report 2007-2008. Available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hs/hsees/annual2008.html

2 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency preparedness and response chemical categories. Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/agentlistchem-category.asp

3 Waeckerle JF, Seamans S, Whiteside M, et al. Executive summary: developing objectives, content, and competencies for the training of emergency medical technicians, emergency physicians, and emergency nurses to care for casualties resulting from nuclear, biological, or chemical (NBC) incidents. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:587–601.

4 Handling of Hazardous Materials Clinical and Practice Management Policy Statement. American College of Emergency Physicians. October 2006. Available at http://www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=29496

5 Disaster Medical Services Clinical and Practice Management Policy Statement. American College of Emergency Physicians. October 2006. Available at http://www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=29176

6 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency preparedness and response mass casualties predictor. Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/predictor.asp

7 Okumura T, Takasu N, Ishimatsu S, et al. Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:129–135.

8 Gutierrez de Ceballos JP, Turegano-Fuentes F, Perez-Diaz D, et al. 11 March 2004: the terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain—an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained, and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9:104–111.

9 Macintyre AG, Christopher GW, Eitzen E, Jr., et al. Weapons of mass destruction events with contaminated casualties: effective planning for health care facilities. JAMA. 2000;283:242–249.

10 Koenig KL, Boatright CJ, Hancock JA, et al. Health care facility–based decontamination of victims exposed to chemical, biological, and radiological materials. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:71–80.

11 Kales SN, Christiani DC. Acute chemical emergencies. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:800–808.

12 Koenig KL. Strip and shower: the duck and cover for the 21st century. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:391–394.

13 Best practices and guidelines for mass personnel decontamination. 1st ed. Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Chemical and Biological Defense Information Analysis Center; 2003.

14 Marcozzi D. Introduction to chemical disasters. Ciottone GR, ed. Disaster medicine, 3rd ed, Philadelphia: Mosby, 2006.

15 Moffett PM, Baker BL, Kang CS, et al. Evaluation of time required for water-only decontamination of an oil-based agent. Mil Med. 2010;175:185–187.

16 Feldman RJ. Chemical agent stimulant release from clothing following vapour exposure. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:221–224.

17 Schultz CH, Mothershead JL, Field M. Bioterrorism preparedness I: the emergency department and hospital. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002;20:437–455.

18 Sidell FR, Borak J. Chemical warfare agents: II. Nerve agents. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:865–871.

19 Lee EC. Clinical manifestations of sarin nerve gas exposure. JAMA. 2003;290:659–662.

20 U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense Chemical Casualty Care Division. Medical management of chemical casualties handbook, 4th ed. Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Grounds; 2007.

21 Leikin JB, Thomas RG, Walter FG, et al. A review of nerve agent exposure for the critical care physician. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2346–2354.

22 Corvino TF, Nahata MC, Angelos MG, et al. Availability, stability, and sterility of pralidoxime for mass casualty use. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:272–277.

23 Lawrence DG, Kirk MA. Chemical terrorism attacks: update on antidotes. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25:567–595.

24 Central Intelligence Agency Unclassified Semi-Annual Report to Congress on the acquisition of technology to weapons of mass destruction and advanced conventional weapons. 1 January-30 June 2001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2001.

25 Borak J, Sidell FR. Agents of chemical warfare: sulfur mustard. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:303–308.

26 Goffman TE. Toxic chemical effects that might present in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:1149–1154.

27 Kulchycki LK. Vesicant agent attack. Ciottone GR, ed. Disaster medicine, 3rd ed, Philadelphia: Mosby, 2006.

28 Eckstein M. Enhancing public health preparedness for a terrorist attack involving cyanide. J Emerg Med. 2007;35:59–65.

29 Borron SW, Baud FJ, Barriot P, et al. Prospective study of hydroxocobalamin for acute cyanide poisoning in smoke inhalation. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:794–801. e1–e2

30 Shepherd G, Velez LI. Role of hydroxocobalamin in acute cyanide poisoning. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:661–669.

31 Jones R, Wills BK, Kang CS. Chlorine gas: an evolving hazardous material threat and unconventional weapon. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11:151–156.

32 Van Sickle D, Wenck MA, Belflower A, et al. Acute health effects after exposure to chlorine gas released after a train derailment. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:1–7.

33 Coleman CN, Hrdina C, Bader JL, et al. Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:213–222.

34 Wolbarst AB, Wiley AL, Jr., Nemhauser JB, et al. Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: a primer for medical and public health practitioners. Radiology. 2010;254:660–677.

35 Wightman JM, Gladish SL. Explosions and blast injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:664–678.

36 DePalma RG, Burris DG, Champion HR, et al. Blast injuries. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1335–1342.

37 Waselenko JK, MacVittie TJ, Blakely WF, et al. Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:1037–1051.