CERVICAL, THORACIC, AND LUMBAR FRACTURES

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1863 times

CHAPTER 69 CERVICAL, THORACIC, AND LUMBAR FRACTURES

Spinal column injuries in the United States occur at a rate of 4 to 5.3 injuries per 100,000 households. The most common causes of spinal column injuries include motor vehicle accidents (45%), falls (20%), sports-related accidents (15%), violence (15%), and miscellaneous causes (5%).

During the primary survey, as outlined by the American College of Surgeons guidelines, proper head mechanics should be employed for securing the airway. Manual in-line immobilization is preferred to avoid excessive head and neck movement. All patients with suspected spinal injuries should have proper immobilization of the neck and back to reduce the risk of spinal cord damage. Patients wearing a helmet at the time of injury should continue to wear the head apparatus during transport, but may have the face mask cut to provide ventilatory access.

Means of initial immobilization include a cervical collar, tape, or straps to secure the patient’s neck/back and transportation on a firm spine board with lateral support devices. It is estimated that 3%–25% of spinal cord injuries may result from improper immobilization of the spinal column during the transport period.

The resuscitation period is a crucial time after airway management and provisional spinal stabilization have been performed. Maintaining a mean blood pressure greater than 95 mm Hg is recommended to provide adequate perfusion to the spinal cord, and has been shown to provide better neurologic outcomes. The treating physician must monitor for neurogenic shock, which presents as hypotension accompanied by bradycardia due to decreased sympathetic outflow as a result of a cervical or high thoracic spinal cord injury. Treatment consists of both volume replacement and the use of vasopressors if hypotension persists.

NEUROLOGIC INJURY

The spinal cord fills 35% of the canal at the level of the atlas and about 50% in the cervical and thoracolumbar regions. The spinal cord consists of white matter in the periphery and gray matter centrally. The gray, myelinated matter can be divided into three columns. The posterior columns conduct ascending proprioception, vibratory, and tactile signals from the ipsilateral side of the body. The lateral columns conduct ascending pain and temperature signals from the contralateral side of the body via the lateral spinothalamic tracts as well as descending voluntary motor signals from the ipsilateral side of the body via the lateral corticospinal tracts. Finally, the anterior column conducts ascending light touch signals from the contralateral side of the body via anterior spinothalamic tracts and descending fine motor control via anterior corticospinal tracts.

The end of the spinal cord (conus medullaris) is located at L1-L2 intervertebral disk. Below the level of the conus medullaris, the spinal canal is occupied by the lower motor roots called the cauda equina. As a lower motor neuron lesion, injury to the nerve roots has a much better prognosis for recovery than injury to the spinal cord (Figure 1).

Classification of Neurologic Injury

Determining the extent of a neurologic deficit in a patient with a spinal cord injury is paramount to understanding the overall prognosis. A complete injury is one in which “no motor or sensory function exists more than three segments below the level of the injury.” Incomplete injuries retain some neurologic function further than three segments below the level of the injury with the caudal segment exhibiting greater than 60% motor strength and intact sensation.

Patients with complete injuries have less than a 3% chance of motor recovery in the first 24 hours. Patients with sacral sparing have partial continuity of the white matter long tracts and demonstrate an incomplete cord injury. The presence of the bulbocavernosus reflex, a spinal reflex mediated by the S3-S4 region of the conus medullaris, may be absent in the first 4–6 hours after injury while the patient is in “spinal shock,” but usually returns within 24 hours. If the reflex does not return after 24 hours and distal neurological function remains absent, the injury is complete.

The secondary survey in patients with spinal cord injury includes a precise definition of neurologic deficits. Classification systems are useful to compare outcomes between different studies. While a variety of clinical grading systems exist, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale has become the most widely accepted. The ASIA scale identifies motor, sensory, and general impairment deficits, and incorporates the functional independence measure (see page 163).

CERVICAL SPINE TRAUMA

Evaluation

Cervical spine clearance for trauma patients continues to be a topic of debate. Class I evidence suggests that cervical spine radiographs are necessary for patients who present with neck pain or tenderness and have a decreased level of consciousness or are intoxicated, or who have distracting injuries. A cervical spine series consisting of anteroposterior (AP), lateral and open-mouth odontoid views has 85% sensitivity. The addition of flexion-extension views in the awake and alert patient to delineate spinal instability increases the negative predictive value to 99%.

It is important that radiographs include the C7-T1 interspace to identify any pathology around the cervicothoracic junction. The AP radiograph should be evaluated for symmetric disk height, lateral mass alignment, and spinous process orientation. The lateral radiograph should exhibit smooth anterior and posterior vertebral lines and spinolaminar lines as well as symmetric disk spaces and overlap of the lateral masses. Soft tissue planes should be evaluated and should be less than 6 mm at C2 and less than 2 cm at C6.

Computed tomography (CT) is useful to identify osseous pathology not seen on radiographs and is especially helpful at the craniocervical and cervicothoracic junctions. In some centers, CT scanning with sagittal and coronal plane reconstructions is replacing plain radiography as a screening study for high energy trauma admissions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may also be helpful in limited situations to diagnose soft tissue injury, such as the ligaments, disks, and facet capsules.

Anatomy

The cervical spine consists of seven vertebrae, and is subdivided into the atlas (C1), axis (C2), and subaxial spine (C3-C7). The atlas is ring-shaped, consisting of two articular lateral masses without a body or spinous process. The axis contains the odontoid process, which articulates with the anterior arch of the axis. The transverse ligament stabilizes this joint.

The subaxial spine consists of vertebral bodies with concave superior endplates. The facet joints are encapsulated synovial joints with overlying hyaline cartilage. The facet joint angle is 45 degrees in the sagittal plane.

Spinal stability primarily stems from ligament and disk integrity. Craniocervical stability involves intact anterior and posterior atlanto-occipital membranes and articular capsules. The atlantoaxial joint is stabilized by the transverse ligament primarily with the paired alar and apical ligaments provided secondary stabilization. The posterior ligamentum nuchae, interspinous ligaments, and ligamentum flavum acts as a “tension band” to provide resistance against flexion distraction injuries. The atlantoaxial joint provides 50% of the overall cervical rotation (Figure 2).

image

Figure 2 Sagittal cervical spine cross-section.

(Data from Heller J, Pedlow F: Anatomy of the cervical spine. In Clark CR, Dvorak J, Ducker TB, et al., editors: The Cervical Spine, 4th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 2005, p. 9.)

The vertebral artery passes through the vertebral foramina from C6 to C1 and then turns posteromedially around the superior articular process before entering the foramen magnum and joining the basilar artery. The vertebral artery follows a similar course, but enters at the C7 transverse foramina. Unilateral absence or hypoplasia of the vertebral artery is 5%–10%.

The vertebral canal sagittal diameter narrows from 23 mm at C1 to 15 mm at C7. Nerve roots exit the canal through the intervertebral foramen. The posterolateral uncovertebral joint and intervertebral disk forms the anterior border of the foramen while the posterior border is formed by the caudal superior articular facet. The C2 nerve root exits posterior to the C1-C2 facet joint, whereas the remaining cervical nerve roots exit anterior to the facet joints. The spinal nerves pass posterior to the vertebral artery at the middle of the corresponding lateral mass. The cervical plexus consists of the ventral rami of C1 through C4, whereas the brachial plexus is made up from the ventral rami of C5 through T1.

Dens Fractures

Dens fractures have been classified by Anderson and D’Alonzo (Table 1; Figure 6). Type I and III fractures can generally be treated with an external orthosis. Management of type II fractures is more problematic and depends on patient age and associated injuries, as well as fracture displacement and stability. While nondisplaced fractures can sometimes be treated successfully with a halo vest, indications to operate include fracture comminution, displacement greater than 6 mm, posterior angulation, delay in diagnosis, and patient age greater than 50 years old. In general, elderly patients can be considered for C1-C2 fusion because of their decreased healing rates and poor tolerance of halo vest. Severely debilitated patients, on the other hand, can be treated with a cervical collar until comfortable, with the understanding that a successful fusion may not occur.

Table 1 Classifications of Dens Fractures

Type I Avulsion fractures of tip
Type II Waist fractures
Type III Fracture extends into C2 body

Source: Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT: Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg 56:1663–1674, 1974.

image

Figure 6 Types of odontoid fractures.

(From Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT: Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg 56:1663–1674, 1974.)

Surgical treatment can also be performed via anterior odontoid screw osteosynthesis, particularly for oblique fractures that run from anterosuperior to posteroinferior, patients with C1 ring fractures, and younger patients. C1-C2 arthrodesis can be performed via several techniques including wiring, transarticular screws, or rod and screw constructs.

Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of Axis

Bilateral fractures of the par interarticularis are called hangman’s fractures. Most injuries are caused by motor vehicle accidents. Hangman’s fractures are classified by Levine and Edwards (Table 2; Figure 7). Type I fractures require 6–12 weeks of halo vest immobilization. Surgical options for type II and III fractures include reduction followed by anterior C2-C3 interbody fusion, posterior C1-C3 fusion, or bilateral C2 pars screw osteosynthesis.

Table 2 Classifications of Hangman’s Fractures

Type I Fractures with <3 mm of displacement and no angulation due to axial compression and hyperextension
Type IA Asymmetric fracture line with minimal angulation or displacement due to hyperextension with lateral bending forces
Type II Fractures with >3 mm of translation and angulation due to hyperextension and axial loading followed by rebound flexion
Type IIA Fractures demonstrate angulation without translation due to a flexion-distraction injury
Type III Fractures include C2-C3 facet dislocation due to hyperextension followed by flexion mechanism

Source: Levine AM, Edwards CC: The management of traumatic spondylo-listhesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg 67:221–226, 1985.

image

Figure 7 Types of Hangman’s fractures.

(From Levine AM, Edwards CC: The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg 67:221–226, 1985.)

Subaxial Spine Fractures

Isolated fractures of the spinous process, lamina, and transverse processes occur frequently, and are most often stable as long as the facet articulations are competent and minimal vertebral translation has occurred.

Subaxial cervical spine fractures can be subclassified many ways. The most common injuries include compression, burst, and teardrop injuries.

Compression flexion injuries cause failure to the anterior half of the vertebral body without disruption of the posterior body cortex. The mechanism is a hyperflexion or axial loading injury. Patients are usually neurologically intact and in the absence of gross deformity or instability, most fractures heal with external immobilization in 6–12 weeks.

Burst fractures involve the anterior and middle columns and may extend into the posterior body cortex. Burst fractures that do not involve the posterior elements are more stable and can be treated in a halo for 12 weeks. Fractures that involve the posterior elements are unstable and can be associated with cord compromise. These types of fractures require anterior surgical decompression and stabilization via an anterior plate or added posterior fixation if necessary.

Extension tear drop injuries occur with hyperextension of the neck with an avulsion fracture of the anteroinferior vertebral body. This injury typically occurs at the C2-C3 interspace. Most of these injuries can be treated with a cervical collar for 6–8 weeks, even if the anterior longitudinal ligament has been disrupted. Flexion teardrop injuries are a more severe injury and may be associated with spinal cord injury. The teardrop fracture is located at the anteroinferior corner of the body, with the posteroinferior corner of the body rotating into the canal and possibly causing an anterior cord syndrome. Initial treatment consists of tong application for spinal reduction. Anterior decompression may be necessary to address cord compromise along with anterior and/or posterior stabilization.

THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE TRAUMA

Fractures

Denis’s three-column concept is frequently used because it includes the injury patterns most commonly seen and relates them to a specific mechanism of injury. The classification includes both minor and major injuries. Minor injuries include isolated fractures to the articular process, transverse process, and pars interarticularis. Major fracture types include compression, burst, flexion distraction, and fracture dislocations (Figure 8).

image

Figure 8 Spinal columns. SSL, Supraspinal ligament; PLL, posterior longitudinal ligament; ALL, anterior longitudinal ligament; AF, annulus fibrosus.

(Adapted from McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP: The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar factures: an analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg 65:461–473, 1983, with permission.)

Thoracolumbar Junction and Lumbar Spine Fractures

Injuries to the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) represent 50% of all the thoracic and lumbar fractures. The thoracolumbar junction is a transition area from the rigid thoracic spine to the more flexible lumbar spine. The thoracic spine is stiff due to rib articulations, alignment of facets, and disk alignment.

The thoracic spinal cord has poor vascularity as well as a constant medullary artery (artery of Adamkiewicz). This medullary artery originates from the intercostal artery on the left side between T10 and T12, and has an anastamoses with the anterior spinal artery. Injury to the artery of Adamkiewicz via trauma or iatrogenic can lead to frank paralysis.

Lumbar spine fractures occur predominantly to L3-S1. Normal lordosis is generally thought to be less than 60 degrees. The spinal cord usually terminates at L1. The conus can broaden to occupy as much as 50% of the canal diameter. Within the dural sac, the most lateral roots exit more proximally because they are tethered by the bony foramen anterolaterally. Fractures of the lower lumbar spine are less common (L3-L5). This region is intrinsically stable due to the lordotic nature of the lumbar spine, which places the weight-bearing axis in the middle and posterior columns, and the sagittal-oriented facets, which accommodate for greater flexion-extension moments.

Neurologic injuries are of two types in the lumbar spine. The first is a complete cauda equina syndrome, which is often seen with burst fractures with canal retropulsion. The second type is isolated nerve root injuries which may entail a root avulsion with associated transverse process avulsion or nerve impingement.

At the thoracolumbar junction, compression fractures are usually anterior but can be lateral. Typically the superior endplate is involved (68%), but both endplates may also be involved (16%). In the lumbar spine, compression fractures are quite infrequent because of the posteriorly oriented weight-bearing axis. The mechanism is predominantly a flexion type of injury that produces a fracture of the superior subchondral plate of the vertebral body. Compression fractures are more common in patients with osteopenia. Additionally, elderly patients may develop an ileus for a significant retroperitoneal hematoma due to the compression fracture.

Compression fractures with less than 50% height loss or less than 25 degrees of kyphosis are considered stable and can be managed in a thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) for 3 months, and are encouraged to lie in the prone position to minimize their deformity. L5 compression fractures can be accentuated by lumbar-only orthosis, and thus requires a single leg included in the orthosis to immobilize the lumbosacral junction. Patients should receive serial radiographs in the standing position at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months to be certain that healing has taken place.

Burst fractures usually occur with axial loading and usually involve the superior endplate in the thoracolumbar junction and the superior endplate in the lumbar spine. The presence of a longitudinal laminar fracture seems to be associated with traumatic dural tears with the potential of entrapping nerve roots within the lamina fracture.

Burst fractures that involve the anterior and middle columns are termed stable and are treated in a TLSO or total contact cast. Unstable burst fractures involve all three columns of the spine. Operative treatment should be considered for fractures with greater than 50% canal compromise, greater than 25 degrees of kyphosis, or the presence of a neurologic deficit. Anterior decompression and fusion should be considered for patients with significant neural compression and neurologic deficits with minimal kyphotic deformity. Cord decompression is best accomplished from an anterior approach when bony retropulsion exists into the canal. Posterior decompression, that is, laminectomy or laminotomy, can be performed below the cord level. Posterior instrumentation demonstrates the greatest rigidity because the hardware is closer to the center of the spinal axis.

Flexion distraction injuries typically occur from seat belts without shoulder harnesses where the fulcrum sits anterior to the spine. This fracture places the middle and posterior columns and anterior column in compression. The fracture can propagate purely through the ligaments (11%) or the bone (47%). Bony flexion-distraction injuries may be treated in a molded TLSO for 3–4 months, and then have serial standing radiographs to ensure that the deformity has not progressed. Ligamentous injuries require posterior instrumentation with compression techniques to provide stability and maintain alignment.

Flexion dislocation injuries involve all three columns of the spine. Three mechanisms have been described (1) flexion rotation, (2) shear fracture-dislocation, and (3) bilateral facet dislocation. In flexion rotation and bilateral facet dislocation, distraction is usually necessary to reduce the dislocation. After the reduction is performed, a neutralization plate may be used. Shear injuries are the most unstable because this is a three-column injury with ligamentous damage as well. These fractures require a combination of long distraction with short compression instrumented techniques.

SUGGESTED READINGS

Allen BL, Ferguson RL, Lehman TR, et al. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine. 1982;7:1-27.

An HS, Simpson JM, Ebranheim NA, et al. Low lumbar burst fractures. Orthopedics. 1992;15:367-373.

Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. JBGS. 1974;56:1663-1674.

Anderson PA, Montesano PX. Orthology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine. 1988;13:731-736.

Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1979;61:1119-1142.

Bracken MB, Sheppard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1405-1411.

Chapman JR, Anderson PA. Thoracolumbar spine fractures with neurologic deficit. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25:595-612.

Delamarter RB, Sherman JE, Carr JB. Cauda equine syndrome: neurologic recovery following immediate, early, or late decompression. Spine. 1991;16:1022-1029.

Denis F. Instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop. 1984;189:65-76.

Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94-99.

Hurlbert RJ: The role of steroids in acute spinal cord injury: an evidence-based analysis. Spine 26(Suppl 24):S39-S46.

Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. management of vertebral artery injuries after nonpenetrating cervical trauma. Guidelines for management of acute cervical spinal injuries. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(3):S1-179.

Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. JBGS. 1985;67:217-226.

Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:184-201.

Peris MD, Donaldson WF, Towers J, et al. Helmet and shoulder pad removal in suspected cervical spine injury. Spine. 2002;27:995-999.

Nesathurai S. Steroids and spinal cord injury: revisiting the NASCIS II and NASCIS III trials. J Trauma. 1998;45:1088-1093.

White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990.

Wood K, Butterman G, Mehbod A, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003;85:773-781.

Yue J, Sossan A, Selgrath C, et al: The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3 year consecutive series. Spine 27:2782–2787.