25 Cervical StenosisMyelopathy
KEY POINTS
Introduction
Cervical spondylotic stenosis is the number one cause of myelopathy in patients over the age of 55.1 For this reason, the spine surgeon focusing on the care of the aging population must be adept in understanding the clinical presentation of cervical myelopathy and correlating these changes to the radiographic studies available. After this careful review, the appropriate management can be discussed with the patient as it relates to his or her overall medical health.
Degenerative changes that begin in the cervical disk lead to a cascade of changes in the bony and soft tissue anatomy of the cervical spine. The disk height is diminished, and intrinsic changes in the disk prevent the natural distribution of axial and rotational forces.2 These unnatural increased forces at the vertebral endplates, uncovertebral joints, and facet complexes lead to the formation of peripheral osteophytes that can diminish the diameter of the canal. Through repeated cycles of flexion and extension, the spinal cord can be stressed against these osteophytes. Posterior to the spinal cord, degenerative changes can lead to reactive hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum as well as facet arthropathy.2 Extension of the cervical spine can lead to buckling of the posterior ligaments and further compression on the spinal cord.3 The situation is further exacerbated in individuals with a congenitally narrowed spinal canal.3 The average cervical spinal canal diameter on plain x-ray is 17 mm.4 The diameter of the spinal cord itself, on average, is measured at 9 mm, while the CSF space and ligaments that surround the spinal cord are averaged at 4 mm. Patients are often thought to become symptomatic from cervical stenosis with diameters less than 13 mm.5
The pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy is still under investigation. Pathologic analysis of the injured cervical spinal cord reveals a flattening and indentation of the cord. These changes are most directly seen in the dorsal and lateral columns.1 There is evidence to suggest that ischemic changes are the direct cause of the injury seen in the cervical spinal cord.3 In severe cases of myelopathy, necrosis and cavitations are seen in the central spinal gray matter as well. Demyelination changes are also evident in the lateral columns at the level of compression, with further demyelination changes in the caudal corticospinal tract.1 Furthermore, the cervical spinal cord between C5 and C7 is a watershed region and is acutely sensitive to any changes in vascular flow. Compressive forces that affect the delicate radicular arteries, anterior spinal artery, and dorsal spinal artery at these levels can lead to the central necrosis of the gray matter that is seen with myelopathy.1
The symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy can be varied and subtle. A thorough history and a sensitive physical examination are as essential as the radiographic data. Initial signs of spinal cord injury often manifest in the lower extremities.4 These symptoms include fatigue and subjective weakness in the legs as well as a worsening sense of imbalance and gait difficulties. Symptoms often progress to the upper extremities and manifest as difficulty manipulating objects with the fingers and loss of manual dexterity. Bowel and bladder dysfunction is a variable symptom, and its prognostic indication remains unclear. Pathologic reflexes and other symptoms of upper motor neuron injury are common, including increased tone in the extremities with associated hyperreflexia, clonus, and positive Hoffman and Babinski signs. In severe cases, abnormal sensory changes can also be appreciated.
Cervical spondylosis is considered the most common progressive degenerative disease of the cervical spine. It is seen in 10% of patients by the age of 25 years and 95% of patients by the age of 65.1 Cervical spondylosis remains the most common cause of myelopathy in the aging individual, but there are numerous other causes that must be considered. Other causes of myelopathy include: ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ossification of the ligamentum flavum, trauma, intrinsic/extrinsic tumors, compressive abscesses, or inflammatory disease processes including rheumatoid arthritis.3
Anterior and posterior decompressive procedures have been shown to be effective treatments in halting the progressive course of cervical myelopathy.2 A prospective multicenter nonrandomized comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for cervical myelopathy with a mean follow up of 11 months revealed that patients treated with operative management had significant improvement in functional status and neurologic symptoms.6 Even with this information, patient selection for operative treatment of myelopathy remains key, as the natural history of the disease remains unpredictable.
Anterior approaches are often successful in treating focal anterior pathology such as a discrete cervical disk herniation. Although the anterior approach is safe and effective, there exist many potential risks that must be carefully understood. These risks include possible injury to the vascular structures (carotid and vertebral artery, jugular vein), neurologic structures (recurrent laryngeal nerve), and soft tissue structures (esophagus, trachea, lymphatic duct).4 Furthermore, the fusion that is performed after an anterior cervical discectomy/corpectomy will limit cervical mobility and can lead to accelerated degenerative changes at the end of the fusion construct.
Posterior cervical decompression for cervical stenosis is a safe and effective treatment option, but can also have increased risks in the elderly population. The procedure requires a significant degree of muscle division and reflection off the cervical spine. These muscles can have the propensity to become denervated or devascularized when retracted for the long procedure. This can lead to postoperative pain and spasm that can be persistently disabling in 18% to 60% of patients.7 The complete removal of the laminae, spinous process, interspinous ligaments, and a portion of the facets can have long-term negative effects on cervical sagittal balance.2 Iatrogenic destabilization of the cervical spine and postoperative kyphosis can be limited by lateral mass fusion of the cervical segments, but this procedure leads to extended operative time, increased blood loss, and restrictive motion.2 Furthermore, as discussed earlier, fusion can lead to adjacent segment degenerative changes.
By utilizing techniques developed for the posterior decompression of the lumbar spine, minimal access surgery can be performed in the cervical spine. The cervical microendoscopic decompression of stenosis (CMEDS) is a procedure that allows for bilateral posterior decompression of one to three cervical levels through a single 1.8 cm incision.8 By utilizing a unilateral approach, the contralateral musculature and ligaments are preserved, leading to less perioperative pain and increased stability of the posterior “tension band.” The limited studies in the use of this procedure have shown the potential for decreased blood loss, decreased length of stay, decreased use of pain medications, and preservation of normal cervical lordosis.7