Chapter 76 Cervical Discectomy
Indications for Cervical Discectomy
Age-related degeneration as well as trauma can lead to disc pathology requiring surgical excision. Commonly accepted indications for cervical discectomy include myelopathy and persistent radiculopathy that is unresponsive to nonsurgical measures.1,2 Less commonly accepted indications include axial neck pain and/or headaches3 that can be attributed to the disc pathology. The pathologic cervical disc can be approached ventrally and dorsally. Both approaches have been in use for over a half century4–8 and still find utility today.
The dorsal approach is indicated for a soft, foraminal (lateral) disc herniation with radiculopathy.1 One of the major advantages is that the posterior approach can be performed via a “keyhole” foraminotomy without creating instability at the segment. Disadvantages include the technical challenges (positioning, epidural bleeding, wound complications) and the surgeon’s learning curve, as this procedure is less commonly performed than is the more versatile ventral approach in most centers. Additionally, central disc herniations, “hard” disc herniations with uncovertebral bone spurs, and myelopathy are not adequately addressed via this approach. The dorsal approach for a discectomy via a foraminotomy can be accomplished with a small traditional midline incision and a self-retaining retractor9,10 or with a tubular retractor system.11
The ventral approach is very familiar to most spine surgeons. In most patients, the C3-4 level down to the C7-T1 level can be approached via a standard ventrolateral approach. Advantages of the ventral approach include access for central and bilateral foraminal decompression. Although some authors have reported good results for anterior discectomy without interbody fusion, interbody fusion following discectomy has become the standard of care in most centers. Recent trends include the use of allograft along with ventral cervical plates.12 Cervical disc arthroplasty devices are now available and can be used for postdiscectomy reconstruction; excellent results have been reported in properly selected patients.13,14
Anterior Cervical Discectomy
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Technique
Preoperative Planning
It may be appropriate in revision settings to get a preoperative otolaryngology consult to evaluate vocal cord paralysis.15 If a vocal cord paralysis exists, the approach should be made on the ipsilateral side to avoid a potential bilateral paralysis. An approach on the right side may put the recurrent laryngeal nerve at more risk, while a low approach on the left side may put the thoracic duct at risk.
Intraoperative Procedures
The anesthesiologist administers 10 mg of intravenous decadron to minimize ventral swelling and prophylactic antibiotics (usually cefazolin 1 g) to minimize the risk of infection.
The carotid tubercle, usually at C6, and ventral osteophytes can be palpated to estimate levels. The prevertebral fascia is cleared off the discs (hills) and vertebral bodies (valleys) using scissors and forceps with a nick-and-spread technique. The hand-held retractor is then replaced under this layer (Fig. 76-1).
Once the radiology technician is present, a bent 12-mm, 14-mm, or 16-mm spine needle (based on preoperative radiographic measurement) is placed in the disc space of choice. The carotid tubercle and/or ventral osteophytes can be used to predict the level (Fig. 76-2). Dissection can continue while the film is being processed. The sterile draped microscope is then brought into the field. The “valley” of the ventrolateral aspect of the vertebral body above and below the suspected disc is cauterized to get the segmental arteries and perforating branches. The longus colli is elevated off the vertebral body “valley” by using coagulate (cranial and caudal enough to place the plate comfortably) and then off the ventral disc “hill.” The safe (nonanomalous) position of the vertebral artery should be confirmed on the preoperative axial MRI or CT prior to elevation of the longus. The longus colli in the upper cervical spine (i.e., C3-4 and higher) is less muscular and less well defined. A Penfield 2 can be used to safely elevate the longus at the vertebral body out laterally over the transverse process. Bleeding bone on the front side of the vertebral body under the elevated longus can be coagulated with bone wax used as needed. If bleeding starts from the undersurface of the longus or out laterally, a hemostatic agent and a large cottonoid patty can be used. The self-retaining (Shadowline or similar) retractors are placed underneath the elevated layer of the longus colli. The hand-held retractor is used to move the esophagus so that the self-retaining retractor blade can be safely placed under the longus. An assistant’s hand on the medial self-retaining retractor handle can stabilize downward and keep it correctly positioned (Fig. 76-3). The vertebral body just cranial and caudal to the disc space is prepared for insertion of the Caspar retraction posts. Prior to insertion of the Caspar pins, a rongeur or bur is used to remove the ventral osteophytes until they are flat with the ventral surface of the vertebral body. Caspar pins (usually 14 mm or 16 mm based on preoperative and localizing radiographs) are inserted by hand. Careful insertion is important if the patient is very myelopathic or stenotic. The superior post should be farther away from the cranial inferior end plate, but the inferior post is just below the caudal superior end plate. This is due to the angled shape and orientation of the cervical vertebral bodies, and will allow good purchase of the screws. The Caspar pins can be inserted slightly diverging to allow for lordosis. Proper insertion of the Caspar posts is critical. The posts must both be in the center of the vertebral bodies, since going off center with one post may result in vertebral twisting and scoliosis after the Caspar retractor is placed. If the posts are not placed in the center but are both off to one side, the distraction of the interspaces will be asymmetrical and lead to uneven end-plate preparation while the posts are retracting. Excellent visualization of the bodies before placing the posts will help to avoid errors at this step. Centering with reference to the spine is more reliable than centering with reference to the patient’s chin and sternal notch. The cranial angulation of the disc space should be parallel to the path of the Caspar pin in the sagittal plane. It can be helpful to identify the disc space with a Bovie or #15 blade if the surgeon is unsure of the location or angle. The posts must diverge or be parallel when inserted to lordose the spine and prevent the cephalad post from entering the end plate, given the upward sloping nature of the end plate. If the Caspar pins are not placed divergently, the threads of the cephalad post may be encountered while burring out the end plate.