Cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4333 times

Chapter 19 Cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators

Cardiac pacing has rapidly evolved since its introduction by Zoll in 1952.1 The technological knowledge gained in pacing has assisted in the even more rapidly advancing field of implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs). Although implantation and follow-up of permanent pacemakers and ICDs are in the domain of appropriately trained cardiologists, intensive care physicians should be familiar with such devices as a significant number of critically ill patients will have them in situ. It is also essential, when urgent pacing is required, that the intensivist is skilled in all aspects of temporary pacing, including lead insertion and testing.

Cardiac pacing repetitively delivers very low electrical energies to the heart, thus initiating and maintaining cardiac rhythm. Pacing may be temporary, with an external pulse generator, or permanent, with an implanted pulse generator. It is usually associated with the treatment of bradycardia, but rapid atrial or ventricular pacing can be used to terminate certain supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and ventricular tachycardias (VTs).

More recently, the indications for cardiac pacing have expanded beyond symptomatic bradycardia and include conditions such as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), congestive cardiac failure (cardiac resynchronisation therapy: CRT) and prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF).

CARDIAC PACING IN BRADYARRHYTHMIAS2,3

PACEMAKER MODES

The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) and the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group (BPEG) developed the NBG code4 for pacing. It is a generic code used to identify modes of pacing (Table 19.1). The code was updated in 2002 to include multisite pacing therapy (position V).5

Position IV: refers to R or rate modulation. An R indicates that the pacemaker incorporates a sensor to vary the pacemaker independently of intrinsic cardiac activity. A sensor,6 in effect an artificial sinoatrial (SA) node, increases or decreases the heart rate according to the body’s metabolic needs. Two different sensors are widely used:

SPECIFIC PACING MODES

The three-position code (Figure 19.3) is adequate to describe emergency temporary pacing and most forms of permanent pacing in the intensive care unit (ICU) (Table 19.2).

DUAL-CHAMBER PACING

Two sets of electrodes are required (atrial and ventricular).

DVI (AV SEQUENTIAL) PACING

Atria and ventricles are paced in sequence (Figure 19.7). After a stimulus is delivered to the atrium, there is a delay and an impulse is then delivered after atrial stimulation, to the ventricles. If AV conduction is successful, the ventricular output of the pacemaker is inhibited; otherwise the ventricle is paced. The advantage of this mode is that the atria and ventricles usually contract in sequence. To maintain AV synchrony in the absence of atrial sensing, the pacemaker discharge rate must be greater than the spontaneous atrial rate; asynchronous atrial pacing can precipitate AF. Self-inhibition (‘cross-talk’) can occasionally occur, that is, inappropriate detection of the atrial pacing stimulus by the ventricular channel. If there is no escape rhythm, asystole may result. DVI pacing is indicated when there is impaired AV conduction with an atrial bradycardia. It is of no value when atrial tachyarrhythmias are present.

DDD PACING

There is pacing and sensing in both chambers (Figure 19.8). An atrial impulse will trigger a ventricular output and simultaneously inhibit an atrial output. If the impulse is conducted normally to the ventricle, the ventricular output is then inhibited, as with the DVI mode. Upper rate-limiters prevent the pacemaker from following excessive atrial activity with paced ventricular responses. DDD pacemaker function depends on the underlying cardiac rhythm:

Self-inhibition can be prevented by introducing a ventricular blanking (refractory) period coinciding with the atrial pacing stimulus. With DDD and VDD pacing, re-entry pacemaker-mediated ‘endless-loop’ tachycardias are possible.7 These are commonly initiated by a ventricular premature beat (Figure 19.9) conducted retrogradely to the atria, where it is sensed and ventricular pacing is triggered with an endless loop: the circuit’s anterograde limb is the pacemaker, and the retrograde limb is via the AV node. Conversion to asynchronous (non-sensing) mode or DDI or increasing the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) will prevent endless-loop tachycardia.

HAEMODYNAMICS OF CARDIAC PACING

In the normal heart, cardiac output increases three- to fourfold during exercise, due mainly to increased heart rate and increases in stroke volume. Atrioventricular synchrony – the normal activation sequence of the heart in which the atria contract first and then, after an appropriate delay, the ventricles contract – contributes only about 20% of cardiac output.8 Thus the ability of pacemakers to increase heart rate is paramount, although AV synchrony may on occasions be vital (e.g. in low-cardiac-output states). Many permanent pacemakers are rate-adaptive. When temporary pacing is used, the arbitrary back-up rate of 70–80 beats/min may need to be increased if oxygen delivery is inadequate. For life-threatening bradyarrhythmias, increasing heart rate with VVI mode pacing is the treatment of choice. Permanent VVIR pacing (most commonly using an activity or respiration sensor) will allow heart rate modulation. However, in the ICU, adaptive rate changes may not occur. For example, no activity will be sensed in a patient with septic shock, even when the cardiac output is low.

During VVI and VVIR pacing the atria and ventricles beat independently and AV synchrony is lost. Occasionally this can have deleterious effects and cause a ‘pacemaker syndrome’.9 The pacemaker syndrome is, however, a complex of clinical signs and symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony. A fall in blood pressure coinciding with the onset of ventricular pacing is consistent with the pacemaker syndrome. It was initially recognised with VVI pacing but can occur with any pacing mode if there is AV dissociation, and can be compared to the effects in patients with complete heart block and AV dissociation. The atria contract against closed AV valves with significant regurgitation of blood into the pulmonary and systemic circulation. Blood pressure, stroke volume and cardiac output may fall. The pacemaker syndrome can be eliminated by restoring AV synchrony.

Emergency and long-term haemodynamic effects of DDD or AAI pacing are generally superior to VVI pacing. In studies of patients with permanent pacing, there is a consistent lower mortality with DDD or AAI pacing compared to VVI pacing, and a significantly lower incidence of AF.2 DDD and/or DVI pacing requires two pacing leads, one each in the RA and RV. Under appropriate conditions AAI and DVI pacing provide AV synchrony but not rate adaptation. DDD pacing will usually ensure AV synchrony and heart rate responsiveness, provided the SA node is normal.

Dual-chamber pacemakers require the AV interval to be set as close as possible to the normal P-R interval (140–200 ms). Traditionally, the pacing AV interval is arbitrarily set at about 150–200 ms. If interatrial conduction time (between the RA and LA) is significantly prolonged, the LV may contract before or at the same time as the LA, causing DDD pacemaker syndrome10 with decreased stroke volume and cardiac output (due to LA contraction against a closed mitral valve). Hence, if there is evidence of inadequate cardiac output or impaired oxygen delivery, the AV interval may need to be increased appropriately, or optimised using thermodilution cardiac output or echocardiographic techniques at various AV intervals.

INDICATIONS FOR CARDIAC PACING IN BRADYARRHYTHMIAS

TEMPORARY PACING

Cardiac pacing is indicated for any sustained symptomatic bradycardia that does not promptly respond to medical treatment. Pacing may also be indicated if a bradycardia predisposes to malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The decision to pace is based on bradycardia associated with haemodynamic deterioration, and not on the specific rhythm disturbance. For example, pacing is indicated in a patient with AF and a ventricular response of 50/min associated with a blood pressure of 70/40 mmHg (9.3/5.3 kPa), cardiac failure and oliguria. Pacing is not indicated in an asymptomatic normotensive patient with an inferior infarction, complete heart block and a ventricular rate of 45/min.

Temporary pacing is indicated for the treatment of heart block or sinus bradycardia after cardiac surgery. In high-risk patients, for example, aortic or mitral valve replacement, prophylactic epicardial electrodes are often attached during surgery. DDD (dual-chamber) epicardial pacing has been shown to increase cardiac output at any given heart rate compared to VVI (single-chamber) pacing.11 Temporary perioperative cardiac pacing strategies to increase stroke volume and cardiac output include optimisation of AV delay and occasionally multisite pacing.12 Temporary pacing may be required for bradycardia during cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Asymptomatic patients with bifascicular block do not require prophylactic pacing prior to general anaesthesia, although transcutaneous pacing should be readily available. Patients with second- or third-degree AV block should be paced prior to general anaesthesia and surgery.

Caution should be exercised in patients with acute myocardial infarction as many patients will have received thrombolytic agents; central venous cannulation should be avoided, although if necessary the femoral vein can be used. Prognosis is related to infarct size rather than the degree of AV block. Transcutaneous pacing obviates the need for prophylactic temporary transvenous pacing leads in high-risk patients. Pacing is sometimes required for patients with anterior or inferior myocardial infarction (Table 19.3).

Table 19.3 Complete atrioventricular (AV) block in acute myocardial infarction

Feature Inferior Anterior
Onset Slow (usually via Mobitz 1) Sudden (usually via Mobitz II)
QRS complex Narrow Wide
Ventricular rate > 45 beats/min < 45 beats/min (often 20–30 beats/min)
Escape pacemaker Stable Unstable
Drug response (e.g. atropine) Yes No
Haemodynamic effects No (usually) Yes
Permanent pacing No (usually) Yes (if high-degree AV block persists)
Prognosis Good Very poor

OTHER INDICATIONS

There are also non-bradycardia indications for pacing for haemodynamic improvement. Evolving indications include the following:2,3

2 Heart failure. A significant number of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy have an intraventricular conduction disturbance, usually left bundle branch block (LBBB) with significant ventricular dyssynchronisation and associated paradoxical septal motion and mitral regurgitation. CRT refers to re-establishing synchronous contraction between the left ventricular free wall and the ventricular septum, resulting in improvements in LV performance. Generally, CRT has been used to describe biventricular or multisite ventricular pacing. CRT improves the symptoms of heart failure and improves survival in specific patient groups. In the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines13 for pacing, biventricular pacing is included as a class IIa indication in medically refractory symptomatic New York Heart Association class III/IV patients with idiopathic dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathy, prolonged QRS (> 130 ms), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter > 55 mm and left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.35. The underlying rhythm should be sinus or AF with a ventricular response slow enough to allow continuous biventricular stimulation and capture. The chronic use of CRT via a permanently implantable biventricular pacemaker (the LV lead is usually passed via a tributary of the coronary sinus to the epicardial surface of the LV) is gaining widespread acceptance for treatment of heart failure. Biventricular pacing is usually reserved for permanent pacing. Temporary biventricular pacing with a temporary transvenous pacemaker lead passed to a coronary vein via the coronary sinus has been used successfully in cardiogenic shock and high-degree AV block.14 More recently, permanent devices combining CRT and implantable defibrillators have been developed.
3 AF prevention. Atrial pacing may be effective in preventing episodes of paroxysmal AF. Most trials have been performed in patients requiring permanent pacing for bradycardia who also incidentally have episodes of paroxysmal AF. Synchronous dual-site pacing of either RA and LA or two different RA sites may be superior to single-site atrial pacing by virtue of decreasing dispersion of refractoriness.15 Single-site RA pacing (back-up rate slightly faster than intrinsic sinus rhythm, usually 80–110 beats/min) decreases the incidence of AF after cardiac surgery.16,17 Dual-site, RA and LA, or two-site RA are more complicated but may be superior to single-site RA pacing for AF prevention.18,19

TECHNIQUE OF TEMPORARY TRANSVENOUS PACING

DUAL-CHAMBER PACING

Modern external pacemakers are available (Figure 19.11) which will pace in all modes. These units are small, easy to use and can fit into a small pouch suitable for mobile patients.

TESTING THE PACING LEADS

Pacing threshold and sensing should be tested adequately using the external pacemaker.

PACEMAKER PROGRAMMING

An external programmer emits signals capable of changing (‘programming’) various pacing parameters (Table 19.4). Virtually all modern permanent pacemakers are capable of programming rate, voltage, output, pulse width, sensitivity, mode and AV interval. Programmability is also helpful in assessing various pacemaker problems. The pacemaker format best suited to a particular patient’s needs may change with time, and programmability enables optimal pacemaker function to be achieved, i.e. ‘prescribed’. Pacing changes may be indicated under certain circumstances, for example, decreased pacing rate in a patient with angina or acute myocardial infarction to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption, or increased rate in a patient with haemorrhagic shock.

Table 19.4 Multiprogrammable permanent dual-chamber pacemakers

Parameter Adjustment Comments
Rate Increase Increase cardiac output
  Decrease Reduce myocardial oxygen consumption To assess underlying cardiac rhythm
Output Increase Increasing output may result in successful pacing when there is failure to capture
  Decrease Increases battery life
Sensitivity Increase Reducing numerical value increases sensing ability May cause oversensing occasionally
  Decrease Increasing numerical value decreases sensing ability Useful in oversensing, e.g. T-wave sensing
Mode DDD to DDI To prevent endless-loop tachycardias and to prevent tracking of episodic atrial tachyarrhythmias Mode switching can be automated and programmed either ‘on’ or ‘off’
Atrioventricular interval (AVI) Increase/decrease To optimise stroke volume and cardiac output AVI can be rate-adaptive, i.e. AVI shortens as the heart rate increases
Refractory period (atrial/ventricular) Increase To minimise oversensing, e.g. to prevent ventricular sensing in AAI pacing
  Decrease To optimise sensing under certain circumstances
Hysteresis   To preserve AV synchrony by delaying the onset of VVI pacing until the spontaneous heart rate is significantly less than the back-up ventricular pacing rate
Polarity Unipolar mode To improve sensing. Occasionally to allow pacing to continue when fracture of the other conducting wire occurs
  Bipolar mode To prevent oversensing, e.g. muscle potentials

CARDIAC PACING IN TACHYARRHYTHMIAS

Certain tachyarrhythmias may be treated safely and effectively by rapid pacing and/or premature electrical stimulation. These include:

AVNRT and AVRT rarely require rapid atrial pacing as treatment with drugs such as adenosine or verapamil is usually successful. Atrial flutter, however, is often resistant to drug therapy, and rapid atrial pacing will usually convert it to sinus rhythm. When unifocal atrial tachycardia is associated with an atrial re-entry circuit, rapid atrial pacing will often revert this arrhythmia; conversely, when due to automatic focus discharging at a rapid rate, the arrhythmia is usually incessant and will respond only intermittently, if at all, to atrial pacing. Occasionally, dual-chamber pacing with a short AV interval can be used to prevent drug-resistant AVNRT or AVRT. Rapid continuous atrial pacing can be used to slow ventricular rate during resistant SVTs associated with a rapid ventricular response, by inducing AF and a high degree of AV block. Sustained VT is responsive to rapid ventricular pacing, but this should not be used for very rapid ventricular rates (e.g. > 300/min), or when severe haemodynamic compromise is present, as immediate DC cardioversion is indicated. Rapid cardiac pacing may at times have advantages over DC cardioversion (Table 19.5) and drug therapy (Table 19.6), but is of no value in sinus tachycardia, AF and VF (Table 19.7).

Table 19.5 Pacing versus cardioversion for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias

Table 19.6 Pacing versus drug therapy for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias

Table 19.7 Indications for rapid cardiac pacing in suitable arrhythmias

SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS

The pacing lead is manipulated to a suitable position in the RA. Atrial pacing is started at a slow rate (e.g. 60–80/min) and slowly increased to about 10–20% faster than the spontaneous atrial rate. Inadvertent ventricular pacing, especially at rapid rates, must be avoided. The atrium is paced for about 30 seconds and the pacemaker is then switched off. Normal sinus rhythm should ensue (Figure 19.12). If not, the pacing lead is manipulated to a different position and/or a faster pacing rate is tried. A more prolonged pacing period may be effective. If sinus rhythm still does not result, AF is deliberately precipitated by rapid atrial pacing at 400–800/min. This is an unstable rhythm which usually reverts spontaneously to normal sinus rhythm. AF persists occasionally, but the ventricular rate is usually slower and more responsive to drug therapy than with SVT.

IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER/DEFIBRILLATOR2

This is an implantable device which can recognise and automatically terminate VT and VF. Guidelines13 have been published for ICD implantation; nevertheless, this is a rapidly evolving field with many trials in progress. ICDs are of proven survival benefit (class I) in patients who have had a cardiac arrest due to VF or VT, not due to transient or reversible cause. In other clinical situations ICD implantation may be a reasonable approach, for example, syncope with inducible VT at electrophysiology study which is poorly tolerated haemodynamically, and antiarrhythmic drugs are ineffective and/or contraindicated. A trial24 in over 1200 patients with recent myocardial infarction (> 1 month) and low LV ejection fraction (30%) has demonstrated a decrease in mortality when prophylactic ICD implantation was compared to conventional treatment. ICDs are standard therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death in such high-risk patients.

Virtually all ICD systems are implanted transvenously and include antitachycardia pacing and back-up ventricular bradycardia pacing, dual-chamber pacing with rate-adaptive options. Single- or dual-chamber ICDs may be implanted. One trial25 suggests that single-chamber ICDs may be superior to dual-chamber ICDs in patients who do not have an associated bradycardia. Current devices continuously monitor the patient’s heart rate and deliver therapy when the heart rate exceeds a predetermined limit. There is a graded response which is programmable:

REFERENCES

1 Zoll PM. Resuscitation of the heart in ventricular standstill by external electric stimulation. N Engl J Med. 1952;747:768-771.

2 Hayes DL, Zipes DP. Cardiac pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, et al, editors. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:767-802.

3 Trohman RG, Kim MH, Pinski SL. Cardiac pacing: the state of the art. Lancet. 2004;364:1701-1719.

4 Bernstein AD, Camm AJ, Fletcher RD, et al. The NASPE/BPEG generic pacemaker code for antibradyarrhythmic and adaptive rate pacing and antitachyarrhythmic devices. Pace. 1987;10:794-799.

5 Bernstein AD, Daubert JC, Fletcher RD, et al. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group: the revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:260-264.

6 Leung S-K, Lau C-P. Developments in sensor-driven pacing. Cardiol Clin. 2000;18:113-155.

7 Furman S, Fisher JD. Endless-loop tachycardia in an AV universal (DDD) pacemaker. Pace. 1982;5:486-489.

8 Donovan KD, Dobb GJ, Lee KY. The haemodynamic importance of maintaining atrioventricular synchrony during cardiac pacing in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:320-326.

9 Johnson AD, Laiken SL, Engler RL. Hemodynamic compromise associated with ventriculoatrial conduction following transvenous pacemaker placement. Am J Med. 1978;65:75-81.

10 Pierantozzi A, Bocconcelli P, Sgarbi E. DDD pacemaker syndrome and atrial conduction time. Pace. 1994;17:374-376.

11 Baller D, Hoeft A, Korb H, et al. Basic physiological studies on cardiac pacing with special reference to the optimal mode and rate after cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;29:168-173.

12 Spotnitz HM. Optimizing temporary perioperative cardiac pacing. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:5-8.

13 Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein ET, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE commmittee to update the 1998 pacemaker guidelines). Circulation. 2002;106:2145-2161.

14 Guo H, Hahn D, Olshansky B. Temporary biventricular pacing in a patient with subacute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and third-degree atrioventricular block. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:112.

15 Bryce M, Spielman SR, Greenspan AM, et al. Evolving indications for permanent pacemakers. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1130-1141.

16 Greenberg MD, Katz NM, Iuliano S, et al. Atrial pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiovascular surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1416-1422.

17 Blommaert D, Gonzalez M, Muccumbitsi J, et al. Effective prevention of atrial fibrillation by continuous atrial overdrive pacing after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1411-1415.

18 Levy T, Fotopoulos G, Walker S, et al. Randomized controlled study investigating the effect of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2000;102:1382-1387.

19 Daubert JC, Mabo P. Atrial pacing for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: how and where to pace? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1423-1427.

20 Faris OP, Mitchell S. Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Circulation. 2006;114:1232-1233.

21 Donovan KD, Lee KY. Indications for and complications of temporary transvenous cardiac pacing. Anaesth Intens Care. 1985;13:63-70.

22 Betts TR. Regional survey of temporary transvenous pacing procedures and complications. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:463-465.

23 Murphy JJ. Problems with temporary cardiac pacing. Br Med J. 2001;323:527.

24 Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877-883.

25 Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3115-3123.