Blepharoplasty

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2452 times

CHAPTER 51 Blepharoplasty

See Video image

Introduction

Blepharoplasty requires an understanding of the three-dimensional contours of the periorbital area. Upper blepharoplasty addresses the contours of the upper eyelid space, mainly the region between the eyebrow and the eyelashes. Skin is not the major focus of blepharoplasty, although removal of skin is typically part of the operation. Rather, it is about sculpture and contouring of this esthetic unit. The eyebrow, eyebrow fat pad, orbital fat, and skin, as well as the underlying structures including the tarsal plate, levator muscle, and bony orbital rim, all play a role in determining the contours of the upper eyelid esthetic unit. Each of these components must be considered in evaluation and surgical planning for upper blepharoplasty, and often each of these components may need to be addressed surgically to achieve the results desired by the patient. Eyelid sculpture is an art, not a science. Blepharoplasty planning and execution is quite obviously an individualized process; the surgeon must determine (with variable amounts of suggestion, depending on the sophistication of the patient) the desired esthetic result, and then work with the patient to determine which techniques and surgeries might be used in that case to achieve some or all of the desired esthetic changes. This intermingling of art and technique, of patient desires and technical realities, in addition to the physician–patient relationship, make esthetic eyelid surgery both gratifying and challenging.

Midface rejuvenation, also the responsibility of the ophthalmologist, includes midface lifting and suborbicularis oculi fat (SOOF) repositioning. An in-depth discussion of midface rejuvenation is beyond the scope of this chapter, but the midface structures must be considered by the physician evaluating any patient for lower blepharoplasty. Having said that, within the eyelid complex proper, lower blepharoplasty is primarily about removing or repositioning orbital fat; this is almost always done through a conjunctival approach.

Anatomy

Thorough knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the eyelids and eyebrows is essential for the successful performance of blepharoplasty. An essential, and very often overlooked, point is the need for the understanding of the surface anatomy of the eyelid and eyebrow esthetic unit. Such knowledge will facilitate the preoperative evaluation, which is a fundamental aspect of blepharoplasty surgery.

It is important to develop the ability to ‘see through’ the skin and subcutaneous tissues that drape over the deep anatomic substrates of the periorbital area. The surgeon should get a sense of the contribution of these various substrates to the existing surface anatomy, and therefore a sense of which substrates are available for surgical modification. An understanding of the three-dimensional contours in this area, the contribution of soft tissue and bone, and how they can be enhanced is key in blepharoplasty surgery. Figure 51.1 demonstrates the important characteristics of surface anatomy. Skin and subcutaneous tissues can be excised to reduce redundancy, and fat can be removed to expose the deeper structures, such as the levator aponeurosis and bony orbital rim.

image

Fig. 51.1 Sagittal section of upper eyelid anatomy.

From Goldberg RA, Wu JC, Jesmanowicz A, et al. Eyelid anatomy revisited. Dynamic high-resolution magnetic resonance images of Whitnall’s ligament and upper eyelid structures with the use of a surface coil. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1598–600, with permission.

The vertical proportions of the midface should be well appreciated. The area between the eyebrows and the upper eyelid margin can be divided into thirds. The distance between the eyebrows and the upper eyelid crease occupies two thirds, while that between the upper eyelid crease and the upper eyelid margin is one third. The eyebrow fat pad is usually located above the superior orbital rim. Hereditary factors and involutional changes can cause a descent of this eyebrow fat pad, which thus encroaches on the upper eyelid space and gives a ‘full’ appearance. A beginning surgeon might erroneously attribute this fullness to preaponeurotic fat prolapse and formulate an inaccurate operative plan.

The upper eyelid crease is formed by the farthest superior attachments of the levator aponeurosis to the skin. The actual crease is not typically visible in occidental eyelids because a variable flap of skin, the eyelid fold, hangs down over the crease. The exact positions, extents, and definitions of both the crease and the fold, as well as any subtle asymmetries, should be noted preoperatively and incorporated into the operative plan.

The contour of the tightly attached skin over the levator aponeurosis and tarsus forms the eyelid ‘platform,’ which we call the ‘tarsal platform show’. The septal fat pannus overlies the levator and upper tarsal plate. Racial variations exist, and are important here. At one extreme lies the Asian patient, with an abundant septal fat pannus consisting of skin, subcutaneous eyelid and eyebrow fat that covers the entire tarsal plate, and essentially obliterates any visible platform. At the other extreme lies the aged Caucasian patient with superior sulcus fat atrophy, in which case the entire levator can often be followed up into the orbit, sometimes even with Whitnall’s ligament exposed as a horizontal band just below the orbital rim (Fig. 51.2A and B).

The most medial portion of the upper eyelid, combined with the lateral surface of the nose and the medial canthus, constitutes an area that deserves particular attention. Redundancy in this area is often related to eyebrow ptosis, with tissues encroaching from the glabella to form a diamond-shaped deformity. We can see these changes in a composite photograph of a woman at age 25 and age 75 (Fig. 51.3). This anatomically complex area has different tissue characteristics from the interdigitation of different skin textures. Incisions should not extend into this area because of the high potential of producing postoperative webs or other irregularities that give an esthetically unpleasant outcome (Fig. 51.4). Elevation of the redundant eyebrow tissues out of the multicontoured space, for example through endoscopic forehead lift, is often more effective in restoring the normal width of the radix and improving the contours in the multicontoured medial eyelid space.

The lower eyelid is composed of skin and underlying orbicularis muscle, which continues past the lower orbital rim onto the face. Behind the orbicularis, near the lid margin, is the tarsal plate. The orbital septum fuses with the inferior border of the tarsus and continues caudally to attach to the crest of the lower orbital rim at the arcus marginalis. Just behind the orbital septum are the lower eyelid orbital fat compartments. The orbital fat is bordered posteriorly and superiorly by the lower eyelid retractors, which arise from the inferior rectus muscle and tendon. The lower lid retractors fuse with the orbital septum approximately 5 mm inferior to the inferior tarsal border before inserting onto the tarsal plate. Posteriorly, the lower eyelid retractors are closely adherent to the palpebral conjunctiva of the lower lid (Fig. 51.5).The orbital fat is surrounded by many fine connective tissue septae (septae of Koorneef). A fascial extension of the sheath of the inferior oblique muscle and Lockwood’s ligament called the arcuate expansion inserts on the inferolateral orbital rim and separates the central from the lateral fat compartments. The inferior oblique muscle originates from the anterior medial orbital floor and separates the medial fat compartment from the central fat compartment as it passes posteriorly and laterally beneath the equator of the globe. The lateral fat compartment lies more posteriorly, the central fat compartment lies more anteriorly, and the medial fat compartment is paler in color. As shown in Figure 51.5, the orbital fat can be easily accessed by incising the conjunctiva and lower lid retractors in the fornix while the orbital septum remains well anterior to these structures.

image

Fig. 51.5 Sagittal section of the lower eyelid demonstrating the relationship of the conjunctiva, lower eyelid retractors, and orbital septum to the orbital fat.

Modified from Baylis HI, Long JA, Groth MJ: Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty: Technique and complications. Ophthalmoloy 1989;96:1027–32.

Eyelid assessment: fundamental principles and surgical planning

Upper blepharoplasty

Because blepharoplasty surgery is concerned with anatomy, understanding the surface anatomy of the eyelid complex and its deep underpinnings leads to an accurate assessment of the individual patient, as well as to a sound surgical plan. The best way to learn what blepharoplasty accomplishes is by examining preoperative and postoperative photographs of blepharoplasty patients. This discipline of photograph review should extend to the individual surgeon’s own patients, so that one can learn from one’s own experience.

Aging changes are important. Although some young patients come in for blepharoplasty because of congenital characteristics that displease them, most patients seek blepharoplasty surgery because of age-related changes in the eyelid complex, which are characterized by skin texture changes (with loss of elasticity and formation of wrinkles), enophthalmos (with loss of fat), and inferior displacement of fat (with lower eyelid fat prolapse). It is important to avoid excessive fat removal from the upper eyelid, and attention to eyebrow position is critical for successful rejuvenation of the aging eyelid complex.

Upper eyelid fullness is generally a congenital condition (Fig. 51.6A). It can be addressed by removal of fat from the upper eyelid, exposing the underlying levator aponeurosis and tarsus (Fig. 51.6B, presurgery and C, postsurgery). The surgeon must recognize when the fullness in the eyelid complex is caused by eyebrow descent. The eyebrows are held at a certain position by the tone of the frontalis muscle, which maintains comfortable vision. If heavy tissues are removed from below the brow, it will descend to its resting position (Figs 51.7 and 51.8).

If too much of the septal fat pannus and ROOF (retro-orbicularis oculi fat or eyebrow fat pad) is removed, the underlying structures will be exposed to an undesirable degree (Fig. 51.9A and B). As already mentioned, excessive hollowness of the superior sulcus gives an aged appearance to the eyelid complex. Blepharoplasty in the thin aged upper eyelid must be conservative, with minimal removal of fat. Because there will not be much of a septal fat pannus or eyelid fold to cover the incision, the crease is often made high in the eyelid where it will fall into the shadow of the superior sulcus and be relatively hidden.

If the globe is relatively prominent, the tarsal platform show will be more readily exposed by removing orbital fat (Fig. 51.10). The orbital fat and full eyelid tissues actually benefit the patient by masking underlying proptosis. In this situation the admonition ‘big eye, big trouble’ should be heeded, and fat removal should be conservative or even avoided altogether, perhaps in favor of orbital decompression for proptosis reduction.

Among Caucasian patients, the most obvious structural variations are those between men and women. Women should have a high, arched brow with a relatively deep superior sulcus, and a well-defined upper eyelid crease. Men typically have a straight brow, perpendicular to the nose, with a minimal sulcus and a low, subtle upper eyelid crease. Clearly, with different goals in mind, different approaches must be employed for men and women. There are, however, a few consistencies. Of note, the lateral canthus generally lies 2 mm superior to the medial canthus; the upper eyelid generally crosses the cornea 1–2 mm below the superior limbus, and the lower eyelid generally crosses the cornea tangential to the inferior limbus.

Racial variations are also significant in planning and executing upper blepharoplasty. For example, compared with the Occidental configuration, the Oriental eyelid is characterized by a full, sometimes bulging superior sulcus and a low crease with narrow or absent tarsal platform. The crease narrows medially to form an epicanthal fold. The fullness is based anatomically on abundant and somewhat fibrotic fat in the subcutaneous, suborbicularis, and postaponeurotic spaces. This abundant fat can be carefully sculpted because it is fibrotic, but it is unforgiving, so it is easy to create a contour abnormality, a visible dent, or an undesired second crease if the fat is not evenly, or conservatively, sculpted. The goal of Asian blepharoplasty is usually to retain the full characteristic of the eyelid while better defining the thin tarsal platform show. To accomplish this, conservative debulking of the inferior edge of the septal fat pannus (with sparing and avoidance of the remainder) is performed. Fixation of the orbicularis or skin edge to the exposed tarsus can also be performed to create a firm, low, and meticulously symmetric crease (Fig. 51.11A and B).

Removal of more skin and associated orbicularis muscle than is necessary is not only the mark of the inexperienced or unsophisticated blepharoplasty surgeon, it is also the cause of most of the functional problems associated with the surgery. The significant effect of minimal skin removal can be appreciated in ‘touch-up,’ or reconstructive, upper eyelid surgeries.

Lower blepharoplasty

Lower blepharoplasty addresses the contours of the lower eyelid and cheek. When evaluating patients for possible lower eyelid surgery, the contours of the orbital fat should be observed. Often the medial, central, and lateral fat pads can be identified and individually graded (Fig. 51.12). This type of analysis helps with surgical planning. Inferior to the fat pads, the orbital rim can be seen as a groove marking the arcus marginalis, or orbital septal insertion. There exists an orbitomalar ligament that folds the skin. Medially, the groove can be quite prominent and is often referred to as the ‘tear trough deformity’. Inferior to the groove of the orbital rim, the cheek fat forms various contours over the face of the maxilla and malar prominence. Descent of the SOOF fat pad gives rise to a hollow region below the orbital rim that is bordered inferiorly by a visible trailing edge of the descended SOOF fat pad. Young patients may have a congenitally prominent tear trough deformity.

The lower eyelid skin should be evaluated for wrinkles and folds of skin and orbicularis muscle. Discrete folds of skin and orbicularis can be removed by a skin pinch technique. Fine wrinkles are best removed with chemical peel or CO2 laser resurfacing, which can be performed at the time of blepharoplasty. In general, we advise patients that lower lid wrinkles cannot be improved with surgery. Additional preoperative evaluation includes assessment of the lower eyelid position and tension. In patients with extreme lower eyelid laxity, retraction, ectropion, or entropion, consideration may be given to performing a lateral canthal tightening procedure, or even a transconjunctival entropion surgery, at the time of transconjunctival fat excision.

Procedures: upper blepharoplasty

Anesthesia

Blepharoplasty surgery is most often performed under local anesthesia. In our experience, 2% lidocaine is necessary, to achieve adequate anesthesia of the eyelid and deep periorbital structures. Epinephrine is important for hemostasis; we use a concentration of 1 : 100 000. Addition of Wydase (hyaluronidase) to the anesthetic mixture allows more rapid, and more even, spreading of the anesthesia through the tissues. One vial (75 units) is added to a 25 cc bottle of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (this bottle is then used for all of the morning cases). We inject 3–5 cc of anesthetic into each of the four eyelids. In the upper eyelid, the injection is performed just subcutaneously by making a single puncture and ‘milking’ the fluid across the eyelid. It is often possible to anesthetize the entire lid through one puncture, thus reducing the risk of hematoma formation with the needlestick. If the injection is then given slowly, through a 30-gauge needle, successful eyelid anesthesia can be achieved comfortably with little, or no sedation. Removal of orbital fat is usually the most uncomfortable part of the surgery for the patient, especially when unipolar electrocautery is used. Therefore, in both the upper and lower eyelids, we make a point of injecting behind the orbital septum so that a deep orbital block is achieved.

We almost always use intravenous sedation. The surgery can be performed under straight local anesthesia in appropriately selected patients with careful slow injections, but deep fat removal usually necessitates intravenous sedation. Intravenous sedation also affords the availability of the anesthesiologist, or nurse anesthetist, who can provide additional psychological support to the patient with continuous communication, reassurance, hand-holding, and other physical contact.

The incisions are typically marked prior to anesthesia administration. They are made best with the patient in the sitting position, with patient cooperation, and with the tissues in their normal gravitational relationships (significant change in eyebrow, cheek, and orbital fat position occurs when patients relax into a supine position). Injection anesthesia is then performed. Even in the rare case performed under general anesthesia, we use regional injections of lidocaine and epinephrine to provide hemostasis and decrease the requirement for general anesthesia.

For eyelid work alone, it is unlikely that the toxic dose of lidocaine (7 mg/kg) will be reached. In the average-sized adult, a full 25 cc bottle of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine would be required to reach the toxic level. The same is true of epinephrine (toxic level 7 mcg/kg). In patients who are sensitive to epinephrine, more dilute solutions such as 1 : 200 000 or even 1 : 400 000 can be used to achieve similar degrees of hemostasis.

One of the most important aspects of local anesthesia surgery is ‘staying ahead of the curve’ with regard to the anesthetic wearing off. Even with epinephrine, the effect of lidocaine begins to wear off 45 minutes after the injection. Many cases take longer than this, so it is important to pay attention to the clock and to re-inject before the anesthetic wears off. Otherwise, negative consequences may ensue, including a rise in blood pressure in response to pain and increased bleeding in the field, requiring the surgeon to use more cautery – and more time – all of this creating a cycle that can double the case time. It is far better to stay ahead of the curve by reinjecting the lidocaine/epinephrine mixture every 30–45 minutes.

Designing and marking the eyelid crease

There can be no standard formula for measuring and marking the upper blepharoplasty incisions. The primary decisions involve the location of the inferior crease incision, and how much skin to remove vertically. Secondary decisions involve deciding how much tissue to excise medially and laterally.

The inferior incision, to a certain extent, determines the height of the ‘platform’ of the tarsal plate. However, it is incorrect to assume that the incision will form the eyelid crease and determine its height. If we remember the sagittal anatomy of the eyelid, it is clear that the redundant eyelid and eyebrow complexes will cover the surgical crease in most cases unless aggressive brow and lid surgery is performed.

In a very thin eyelid, for example in a very aged Caucasian patient, there will be little fat and skin to drape over the crease incision, and the incision itself may be visible. In this situation, it may be advantageous to make a high incision that will fall into the shadow of the superior sulcus. In such thin lids, minimal fat will be taken, with the goal of surgery being to remove some redundant skin in the superior sulcus, while smoothing out the long tarsal platform. In this setting a more inferiorly placed eyelid crease incision might not only be visible but also predispose to a second crease forming higher up on the levator aponeurosis.

In a more typical patient, a certain amount of the septal fat pannus will hang over the surgical incision, and therefore the inferior incision is drawn slightly higher than the height of the desired tarsal platform. In a woman, this will typically result in a lower incision, approximately 7–10 mm above the eyelash line centrally (Fig. 51.13). And in a man, an incision typically 5–8 mm above the lash line is indicated. In an Asian patient, the range might be 3–6 mm above the eyelash line centrally. Laterally, the incision dips down to pick up some of the temporal hooding. It is best to address this temporal hooding through eyebrow elevation, but if eyebrow surgery cannot be performed, or if redundant tissue persists after eyebrow elevation, temporal hooding can be excised directly at the expense of a scar in the thicker skin of the temple and at the expense of decreasing the distance between the tail of the brow and the lateral eyelid. Medially, it is also best to elevate redundant tissue out of the multicontoured area (the medial one fifth of the upper eyelid) through appropriate eyebrow elevation. However, if the surgeon elects to compromise and remove redundant skin in this area directly, a ‘lazy S’ incision helps to decrease webbing in this susceptible region by converting the vector of skin tension (upon closure) to a more horizontal direction. This incision is accomplished by dipping down the most medial component of the incision to pick up the medial redundancy. The proliferation of creative flaps such as W-plasties and T-shaped incisions is indicative of the difficulty encountered by surgeons working in the medial canthal region. It is not uncommon to see early web formation, even preoperatively, and any surgery that removes tissue in the medial canthal region is prone to web formation. Web formation is caused primarily by the tendency for the scar to contract, and to ‘clothesline’ the tissues from the nasal bridge across the hollowed concave region of the medial canthal multicontoured surface (see Fig. 51.4). The more the surgeon can lift these tissues out of the multicontoured area through eyebrow surgery, and avoid the temptation to draw the medial canthal incision line far into the multicontoured area, the less chance there is of web formation and other contour problems in this region.

In upper blepharoplasty, the vertical excision of skin should always be conservative. Flowers has suggested that at least 1 inch (25 mm) of skin between the eyebrow and eyelashes is necessary for proper eyelid closure. Certainly, older techniques, such as the ‘skin pinch,’ in which the surgeon tries to maximize skin removal while narrowly avoiding lagophthalmos, are philosophically and technically inappropriate. Rather, the goal should be just the opposite: How little skin can we remove from the lid and still accomplish our surgical goal of creating an eyelid platform while sculpting the eyelid tissues to reveal more of the underlying deep structures? In our experience, we leave at least 20 mm of total skin between the eyelid margin and inferior brow skin. Keep in mind, female patients may pluck their brow hairs and this may not be the true inferior extent of the brow; rather keep in mind the transition from the thick brow skin to the thin eyelid skin as the inferior extent of the brow skin. We have had good results with this and of course it can be customized to the individual patient’s needs. In the presence of uncorrected eyebrow ptosis, the surgeon has to be especially careful to avoid the temptation to address heavy eyebrow tissues by excising them from below, in the eyelid space. This can create a situation in which the ‘eyebrows are sutured to the eyelids’, so that the patient is functionally and esthetically crippled with persistence of heavy eyebrow tissues in the eyelid space and an inability to elevate the eyebrows without creating lagophthalmos (see Figs 51.7 and 51.8). Very rarely is it necessary to excise more than 10 mm of skin in the vertical direction. Typically, a 5–7 mm excision is appropriate, and an excision of 3–5 mm of skin is not uncommon, especially in younger patients.

Surgical technique

After the surgeon marks the incision, either the steel blade, scissors, electrocautery, or the CO2 laser can be used to accomplish the actual cutting. More surgical precision, easier tissue dissection, and a relatively bloodless field are generally seen with the laser unit. At the same time, the need for an instrument that costs between $40 000 and $140 000, demands tighter safety principles, and necessitates additional training is debated by some eyelid surgeons.

In most instances the cutaneous flap is removed in one piece, leaving much or most of the orbicularis intact (Fig. 51.14). In some patients with full eyelids, a small strip of orbicularis can be debulked; care must be taken not to remove too much orbicularis.

Below the orbicularis, the orbital septum can be visualized. In some patients a pronounced preseptal fat pannus can be noticed. This should not be confused with the preaponeurotic fat pads of the upper eyelid. This preseptal fat may represent a gravitational descent of the ROOF, which is the sub-brow fat that has descended to encroach on the upper eyelid esthetic unit, giving a full appearance. This fat can be sculpted or repositioned to its anatomic area with sutures.

The orbital septum is incised horizontally (Fig. 51.15), usually across the full extent of the upper eyelid to provide an ‘open-sky’ approach to the underlying structures. The septum is not a single layer as is usually described, but rather, a multilaminar structure with varying thickness in different areas of the upper eyelid. As Flowers has suggested (see Further reading), the orbital septum should be opened just above its insertion into the aponeurosis, with particular attention to avoiding accidental sectioning of the underlying aponeurosis. The preaponeurotic fat pads will be viewed next. Most of the fullness of the upper eyelid is the result of herniation of the larger central fat pad, but occasionally the smaller nasal fat pad can contribute to significant and localized bulging. The fat that was preoperatively planned for reduction is removed (Fig. 51.16). This can be accomplished in a piecemeal fashion when using electrocautery by alternating the cautery and coagulation. Alternatively, fat vaporization can be accomplished with the CO2 laser. Excessive pulling on the fat pads should be avoided to prevent avulsion of the orbital vessels that usually run within these fat compartments. In some individuals there is excessive fullness at the lateral aspect of the upper lid as a result of involutional stretching and descent of the lacrimal gland into the preaponeurotic tissue plane. Obviously, it is important to identify the more orange-looking friable lacrimal gland tissue, and to avoid its amputation. The lacrimal gland can be repositioned inside the lacrimal gland fossa and sutured to the overlying periosteum.

To reiterate, it is important to avoid excessive reduction of the preaponeurotic fat pads. Its ease of removal with the ‘open-sky’ approach should never lead to excessive removal. Enough fat should be left to serve as a physiologic sliding tissue for upper eyelid excursion. Sometimes, fat repositioning is all that it is required. The ‘valley’ of the superior oblique tendon separates the central fat pads from the nasal fat pads, and it is usually a hollow area (Fig. 51.17). Fat repositioning into this area can reduce the inverted ‘V’ deformity that characterizes the aged eyelid.

After the judicious removal of preaponeurotic fat, the septal edge can be trimmed to provide a flatter, smoother, and tighter upper eyelid platform (Fig. 51.18). This step can be supplemented with excision of a strip of pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle along the inferior edge of the incision for further debulking of the pretarsal area. The CO2 laser is an excellent instrument that can vaporize and tighten these preaponeurotic tissues to create a tight platform and a well-defined eyelid crease.

The last step of the procedure, wound closure, includes the consideration of supratarsal fixation. The preoperative planning will determine whether a well-defined ‘hard’ crease or a more conspicuous ‘soft’ crease is desirable. Generally, a ‘hard’ crease is optimal for women to provide a well-demarcated upper eyelid platform for the application of eye shadow, whereas most men do not benefit from such an abrupt definition of the upper eyelid crease. When supratarsal fixation is performed, the skin and orbicularis oculi muscle of the pretarsal flap along the inferior edge of the incision are anchored together to the ‘leathery’ preaponeurotic fascia at the level of the superior portion of the tarsus. The exact anchoring level varies with each patient and is another manifestation of the individualization that is required in blepharoplasty surgery. Several interrupted sutures can be placed for supratarsal fixation, or a running suture that is used for skin closure can include a purchase of the preaponeurotic fascia (Fig. 51.19). A 6-0 or 7-0 running absorbable or non-absorbable suture on a cutting needle can be used to close the cutaneous incision; some surgeons insist on a subcuticular running closure, but we have not noticed any difference in wound healing or postoperative appearance.

Procedures: lower blepharoplasty

Surgical technique

After sterile preparation with povidone iodine solution and open-face draping of awake patients, the surgery begins with the transconjunctival incision. An assistant retracts the medial third of the lower eyelid downward with a medium or small Desmarres retractor to expose the cul-de-sac. A non-conductive eyelid plate (a Pyrex plate is available from Weiss Scientific Glass Blowing, Portland, OR, which also makes Jones tubes) is placed over the globe into the inferior fornix and is used to balotte the globe posteriorly. This action with the lid plate prolapses the orbital fat over the orbital rim. If the lower eyelid is too tight to allow adequate exposure, a lateral canthotomy and inferior cantholysis can be performed. This is rarely necessary, however. A needle-tip monopolar cutting cautery unit on a low setting is then used to palpate the medial, inferior orbital rim. We prefer the Valley Labs cautery unit set on 1.5–2.0 watts, and an insulated Colorado MicroDissection needle tip (available from Colorado Biomedical, Inc., Evergreen, CO). If the insulated cutting cautery needle tip is not available, a 19-gauge intracath can be placed over any cautery needle tip to avoid inadvertent cauterization of adjacent structures. An alternative cutting instrument that is very effective in lower blepharoplasty is the CO2 laser, which can be used in the continuous or ultrapulse mode at a power of 7–10 watts to incise the conjunctiva. This setting may also be used to incise and vaporize the orbital fat. In addition, Stevens tenotomy scissors can also be used to incise the conjunctiva.

The conjunctiva and lower lid retractors are incised directly over the fat with the needle tip directed 1–2 mm posterior to the inferior orbital rim. The incision may be made from medial to lateral beginning at the apex of the caruncle and extending to the lateral canthus, if necessary, to expose the lateral fat. The incision should be made at least 4 mm inferior to the inferior punctum to avoid damage to the canaliculus. An alternative technique is to make several small (5–7 mm) incisions over the individual fat pockets and connect them as necessary for full exposure. It is important to be at least 4 mm inferior to the inferior tarsal border when incising the conjunctiva and lower lid retractors. After incising the conjunctiva and lower lid retractors, yellow orbital fat can be seen bulging into the field (Fig. 51.20).

Once the fat is noted, the connective tissue septae can be dissected away with the needle tip or toothed forceps until a tuft of fluffy yellow fat is exposed. In some cases, gentle blunt dissection with a Stevens tenotomy scissor is helpful to expose and delineate the three fat components. The assistant grasps the posterior edge of the wound (lower lid retractors) with a 0.5 mm toothed forceps and lifts it up and over the globe. This maneuver protects the globe and further prolapses the fat into the surgical field. The Desmarres retractor can now be repositioned so that the blade is itself in the wound, providing wider exposure. With the connective tissue septae on stretch, the cutting cautery or blunt dissection with the tenotomy scissors can then be used to open the fat compartments widely. The closer the fat compartment is opened to the orbital rim, the easier the exposure and the less chance of encountering bleeding or damage to the inferior oblique muscle.

Laterally, the arcuate expansion of the inferior oblique muscle separates the central fat pocket from the lateral fat pocket (Fig. 51.21). Incision of this fascial band at its attachment to the orbital rim, with scissors or cutting cautery, makes the central fat pocket continuous with the lateral fat pocket. This permits identification and exposure of the lateral fat pocket. The lateral fat pad is covered with more septae than the central pad and may not spring forward as easily. Importantly, it is located superiorly in the orbit, often at the level of the lateral canthal tendon, so that exposing the inner lateral orbital wall with blunt dissection helps expose the lateral fat pad. With excision of the superficial portion of the lateral pad, the fat posterior to this point comes forward more freely.

The medial fat compartment is the most difficult to locate, and partial resection of the central fat may be necessary to allow identification of the medial fat. Of note medially, the inferior oblique muscle separates the central and medial fat compartments. It is important to identify this ‘valley’, especially for the surgeon who is learning this technique. Early identification will ensure that both the medial and central fat compartments are excised, and will avoid injury to the inferior oblique muscle. After identification and exposure of the central fat, which lies most anteriorly of the three fat pads, the medial fat may be totally obscured, or may present as a slight bulge in the superior medial aspect of the wound. The glass lid plate can be replaced at this point and pressure placed on the globe to ballotte the fat forward. The needle tip can be used to sharply dissect the overlying septae and the tenotomy scissors used to gently blunt dissect the fat pad. The medial fat is different from the central and lateral fat in that it appears white and membranous (Fig. 51.22). Additionally, it may not be postseptal at all; rather, it may come from the muscle cone, bulging around the edge of the lower eyelid retractors. The only difference between the lower eyelid medial fat pad and the medial fat pad in the upper lid is that the palpebral vessels go directly through the medial fat pad, as opposed to the upper eyelid where the medial vessels lie on the surface of the fat pad. Once the central and medial fat pads are excised, the inferior oblique muscle will be in plain view.

With advanced techniques, the medial fat pad can be sculpted into a pedicle that can then be transposed outside the orbit along the inferior orbital rim to fill in the tear trough deformity. The orbital septum is opened along the arcus marginalis, and the fat pedicle is arranged in a supraperiosteal, suborbicularis pocket (Fig. 51.23A–D).

With the standard techniques, once all the fat is exposed as described above, the fat is excised in a careful graded fashion with a cutting monopolar cautery or a scissors. Before any excision of fat, it is useful to expose the fat of both lower eyelids, especially for the beginning surgeon, to allow for more symmetric fat excision. The endpoint of fat excision is reached when the anterior border of the fat is seen to be flush with the orbital rim while light pressure is applied to the globe, simulating upright posture. This results in a slight concavity of the lower lid when the patient lies supine. Meticulous hemostasis is necessary during the procedure. The blood vessels associated with each fat compartment should be directly visualized via blunt dissection with applicator tips, followed by cauterization with the monopolar cautery unit (Valley Labs cautery unit on Coag set at 2.0–2.5 Ws). Even when the CO2 laser is used, it is best to have electrocautery available for the occasional vessel that is refractory to coagulation with the laser. There are some large vessels in the orbital fat pockets medially and, to a lesser extent, laterally. These can often be identified and cauterized before they are violated.

After excising the fat, the lower lid margin is pulled superiorly to release any adhesions that might result in lid retraction, as well as to realign the tissue planes (Fig. 51.24). With the lid on stretch, gentle pressure on the globe reveals any residual fat bulges. If necessary, further fat can be excised at this point. In our experience, it is not necessary to close the conjunctiva and lower lid retractors; however, a single interrupted suture of 6-0 mild chromic gut is used to close the conjunctiva centrally if the tissues do not appear well opposed.

Postoperative care and complications

Upper blepharoplasty

Upon completion of the procedure, antibiotic ophthalmic ointment is applied to the suture line and to the cornea. This ointment can be applied daily for approximately 1 week postoperatively. Because of the rich vascularity of the eyelids, eyelid infections after blepharoplasty are exceedingly rare, and so we do not use systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.

Ice ‘burritos’ made with gauze or clean washcloths wrapped around crushed ice are applied continuously over the operated area for 24–48 hours to achieve local vasoconstriction and to minimize postoperative ecchymosis and edema. A mild, non-aspirin-containing analgesic is used to control postoperative discomfort.

Blepharoplasty surgery should not result in significant discomfort. It is imperative that the patient be examined immediately if any pain is noted that is not relieved by analgesics. In patients with excessive pain, acute postoperative hemorrhage is present until proven otherwise. Blindness after blepharoplasty is the most dreaded complication, with an incidence of approximately 1/40 000. Early recognition with prompt intervention is the only way to minimize progression to blindness. The patient should be examined immediately and have a visual acuity and pupillary examination. Should any evidence of optic nerve compromise be present, the wound should be opened without hesitation, and all blood should be evacuated. Medical decompression of the orbit with systemic osmotic agents and corticosteroids should also be initiated. If no response is noted, radical cantholysis and surgical decompression of the orbit should be considered.

It is good practice for the surgeon to contact the patient on the evening of the surgery. A simple telephone call can alleviate the patient’s anxiety and also identify potential warning signs that need immediate attention. The patient is usually examined 5 days after the surgery, as long as earlier problems do not arise. At that time, any non-absorbable sutures are removed. We have noticed that absorbable sutures are more reactive, especially in the younger patients.

The postoperative ecchymosis and edema are expected to gradually improve over the following 2–3 weeks. When all the edema has subsided, the surgeon should critically examine the eyelid contour and shape, identifying suboptimal results such as noticeable asymmetry, irregularity, or webbing. In these circumstances, additional touch up or ‘enhancement’ surgery may be required. The optimal timing for this surgery should be individualized, realizing that healing changes may continue for as long as 3 months, or even 6 months, after surgery. Therefore, there is often an advantage to waiting out subtle asymmetries or undercorrections.

Lower blepharoplasty

Antibiotic ophthalmic ointment or solution is applied to the conjunctiva and ice compresses are immediately applied to the lower lids and, as much as tolerated, for the first 48 hours postoperatively. After the first 48 hours, warm compresses are used four times per day for an additional 7–10 days. The conjunctival incision makes soft contact lens wear difficult for the first week or two, but generally soft contacts can be successfully resumed within 10 days. Hard contact lenses can be resumed after 3–4 days. Postoperative bruising lasts 10–14 days, in general, and patients should be warned that postoperative ecchymosis may increase, or may first appear on the third postoperative day (with the switchover to warm compresses).

The most common complication of transconjunctival blepharoplasty, as reported in five published series, is inadequate fat excision, ranging from 0% to 20% of cases. As previously stated, we do not consider this a complication at all, rather an expected sequela given our conservative philosophy of graded fat excision. Overexcision of fat can lead to a skeletonized, hollow appearance requiring late volume augmentation with fat grafting or synthetic fillers. Lower eyelid malpositions have not previously been reported, but, again, we have recently seen several cases of lower eyelid retraction and malposition. Increased skin wrinkling and redundant lower eyelid skin were reported as complications in 1.6–3.3% of patients, while one small series of seven patients reported redundant skin in two (28.6%) cases. This emphasizes the importance of careful preoperative evaluation and patient counseling, along with consideration for a skin-pinch excision or laser resurfacing at the time of transconjunctival fat excision.

Strabismus is a recognized risk of blepharoplasty, related to scarring and loss of supple function of the orbital motility system; excess removal of fat, excess cautery, and reoperative blepharoplasty are risk factors. We have reported one postoperative wound hemorrhage that resolved spontaneously without permanent ocular sequelae. Additionally, we have seen several cases of persistent conjunctival chemosis after transconjunctival blepharoplasty, all of which resolved over several months. Persistent chemosis can relate to incision placement too close to the globe, postoperative lymphedema, postoperative orbicularis weakness, and postoperative eyelid retraction.

Summary

Most blepharoplasty patients seek eyelid surgery because of age-related changes in the eyelid complex, while a minority are young, with ‘undesirable’ congenital characteristics. The aging process in the eyelid complex is characterized by skin texture changes (with loss of elasticity and formation of wrinkles), enophthalmos (due to loss of fat), and lower eyelid fat prolapse (with inferior displacement of fat). Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is not a matter of skin removal; rather, it involves sculpturing and contouring of the esthetic unit. Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty is extremely effective at reducing lower eyelid ‘bags’ caused by prolapsed orbital fat. The anterior–posterior blepharoplasty, consisting of transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty (or repositioning) and laser resurfacing is, in our hands, one of the most successful surgical procedures in facial esthetic surgery. The blepharoplasty surgeon should avoid excessive fat removal. Instead, the focus should be on conservative fat removal, with or without fat repositioning. Total awareness will lead to successful rejuvenation of the aging eyelid complex. In addition, successful rejuvenation may not require (or indeed benefit from) surgery, and use of adjunctive methods such as hyaluronic acid gel fillers and botulinum toxin may be considered for restoration of the three-dimensional contours (Fig. 51.25).

Further reading

Aiache AE, Ramirez OH. The suborbicularis oculi fat pads: An anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:37-42.

Baylis HI, Sutcliffe T, Fett DR. Levator injury during blepharoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:570-571.

Baylis HI, Long JA, Groth MJ. Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty: Technique and complications. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1027-1032.

Baylis HI, Wilson MC, Groth MJ. Complications of lower blepharoplasty. In: Putterman AM, editor. Cosmetic Oculoplastic Surgery. 2nd edn. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1993:356-388.

Dresner SC, Karesh JW. Transconjunctival entropion repair. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1144-1148.

Edgerton MTJr. Causes and prevention of lower eyelid ectropion following blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49:367-373.

Flowers RS. Periorbital aesthetic surgery for men. Eyelids and related structures. Clin Plast Surg. 1991;18:689-729.

Flowers RS. Optimal procedure in secondary blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:225-237.

Flowers RS. Canthopexy as a routine blepharoplasty component. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:351-365.

Flowers RS, Caputy GG, Flowers SS. The biomechanics of brow and frontalis function and its effect on blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:255-268.

Flowers RS. Upper blepharoplasty by eyelid invagination. Anchor blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:193-207.

Flowers RS, Flowers SS. Precision planning in blepharoplasty. The importance of preoperative mapping. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:303-310.

Flowers RS, Flowers SS. Diagnosing photographic distortion. Decoding true postoperative contour after eyelid surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:387-392.

Goldberg RA, Shorr N, Marmor MF, et al. Blindness following blepharoplasty: Two case reports, and a discussion of management. Ophthal Surg. 1990;21:85-89.

Goldberg RA. Transconjunctival orbital fat repositioning: transposition of orbital fat pedicles into a subperiosteal pocket. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(2):743-748. discussion 9-51

Goldberg RA, Fiaschetti D. Filling the periorbital hollows with hyaluronic acid gel: initial experience with 244 injections. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(5):335-341. discussion 341–3

Hamako C, Baylis HI. Lower eyelid retraction after blepharoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;9:517-521.

Jelks GW, Jelks EB. Preoperative evaluation of the blepharoplasty patient. Bypassing the pitfalls. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:213-223.

Koornneef L. Spatial aspects of orbital musculo-fibrous tissue in man: a new anatomical and histological approach. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1977. p. 1–168

Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367-1376. discussion p. 1377

Levine MR, Boyton J, Tenzell RR, et al. Complications of blepharoplasty. Ophthal Surgery. 1975;6:53-57.

May JWJr, Fearon J, Zingarelli P. Retro-orbicularis oculus fat (ROOF) resection in aesthetic blepharoplasty: A 6-year study in 63 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:682-689.

McKinney P, Zukowski ML, Mossie RD. The fourth option: A novel approach to lower lid blepharoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg. 1991;15:293-296.

Neuhaus RW. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:1100-1109.

Palmer FR, Rice DH, Churukian MM. Transconjunctival blepharoplasty complications and their avoidance: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Arch Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:993-999.

Parkes M, Fein W, Brennan HG. Pinch technique for repair of cosmetic eyelid deformities. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;89:324-328.

Perman KI. Upper eyelid blepharoplasty. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:1096-1099.

Sheen JH. Supratarsal fixation in upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;54:424-431.

Syniuta LA, Goldberg RA, Thacker NM, et al. Acquired strabismus following cosmetic blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):2053-2059.

Suh CD. Laser double eyelid operation. Aesth Plast Surg. 1999;23:343-348.

Sutcliffe T, Baylis HI, Fett DR. Bleeding in cosmetic blepharoplasty: An anatomical approach. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;1:107-113.

Tomlinson FB, Hovey LM. Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty for removal of fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56:314-318.

Warwick R. Eugene Wolff’s Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit: Including the Central Connections, Development and Comparative Anatomy of the visual Apparatus, 7th edn. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1976.