Approaches to patient management

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1190 times

19 Approaches to patient management

Introduction

Perhaps the greatest challenge in clinical functional neurology is integrating the theoretical knowledge that one has acquired and results obtained via practical testing into a coherent approach that can be applied to a patient’s presentation. This is so challenging because everything that happens to us in our daily lives can in some instances be important clinically and in others not matter in the slightest. Everyday events involving sensory stimulation, deprivation, and learning can effectively weaken synaptic connections in some circumstances and strengthen them in others. Just because structural or functional changes may not initially be detected following clinical examination does not rule out the possibility that important biological changes are nevertheless occurring. They may simply be below the level of detection with the techniques available to us.

In this chapter I will try to highlight the approach that I and other neurologists have taken with a variety of patients that have presented to me or other functional neurologists that have graciously supplied the case details to me for this chapter. In all cases, I have tried to present a discussion of why the therapy was applied and the outcome of the treatment, when available. Some of the physical examination findings in some cases are not reported as completely as I would have liked, but in real practice one does not always have a complete picture but is expected to move ahead regardless. In this respect, I have tried to present the cases as they were presented to me or as they have been recorded in my notes. This should give the reader a better feel for clinical application.

Case 19.1

Discussion

The pattern of signs and symptoms revealed during TWB’s functional neurological consultation provide an insight into the possible levels of dysfunction in the longitudinal and horizontal planes of the neuraxis. Localisation of the lesion is assisted by a comprehensive knowledge of the afferent and efferent connections throughout the neuraxis and an ability to ascertain the frequency of firing (FOF) and integrity of fuel delivery in different regions and systems. History and examination directed at localising the symptoms to a specific level of the neuraxis, including the following well-defined functional levels, is necessary:

Asymmetry or dysfunction in each of these components of the nervous system can directly or indirectly affect various motor, sensory, visceral, and mental functions or indicate a dysfunction in any of these modalities.

Most importantly from a functional neurological perspective, asymmetry or dysfunction in the most influential components of the nervous system should be considered:

In the case of TWB, he showed signs and symptoms of left cerebellar and right cortical dysfunction. This was expressed in the physical exam by his relative lack of coordination on the left, his pupillary TND on the right, Romberg’s test falling to the left, his lack of ability to concentrate, and the hyperresponsiveness of his right-sided reflexes, which indicates increased tone due to decreased activation of the PMRF ipsilaterally.

ADHD is thought to occur as a result of an inability of the individual to maintain attention on a primary task because of an inability to inhibit or suppress motor responses to incoming sensory stimuli (Barkley 1997). Some consistency has been found in people with dysfunctions of the right frontal cortex in that they express great difficulty in suppressing motor responses to incoming sensory stimuli (Sergeant 2000). The right frontal cortex functions in some manner to inhibit inappropriate motor responses in a normally functioning brain. The activity of the right frontal cortex relies heavily on the dentato-ponto-cortical and dentato-rubral-thalamo-cortical pathways. Asymmetric reduction in afferent information to the cerebellum because of asymmetric dysfunctional peripheral afferent pathways may cause diaschisis in functional circuits downstream from the cerebellum, in this case the contralateral cortex. In this case, the application of manipulation to increase the afferent stimulus received by the cerebellum and other therapies aimed at increasing the activation of the right frontal cortex were successful in reducing the patient’s symptoms and ultimately his state of disability.

Case 19.2

Examination findings

Neurological testing

Eye movements: left end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;

Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;

Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;

Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;

Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;

Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;

Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;

Opticokinetic (OPK) testing revealed dysmetria when tracking from left to right;

Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;

The patient expressed a mild left-sided pyramidal paresis, and a visible, regular, left-sided hand tremor on observation;

On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left;

The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;

The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands; extinction test was negative;

Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in the C5–T1 dermatomes;

Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles but the left bicep, which was 3;

Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue;

Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;

Trigeminal nerve testing revealed an area of decreased sensation to prick in the left medial maxillary area;

Oral examination revealed increased right-sided scarring on the tongue and a right palatal paresis; tongue strength and protrusion were both good;

Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:

Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present on the left from C1 to T1.

Case 19.3

CH, RH’s mother, accompanied RH to this assessment and related the history.

Examination findings

RH responded in monosyllables (yes, no, fine) to most questions. She lacked the ability to sustain visual attention for more then 3–5 seconds in both right and left visual fields. Visual tracking was dyskinetic to the left. Her pupil responses were fast and fatiguing on the left. She exhibited anisocoria with the right pupil dilated. She showed good and accurate response to palmar dermatographia bilaterally. She showed no signs of extinction to touch in the C5–8 dermatomes but did to hearing on the left. Her reflexes (C5, C7, L4, S1) were diminished and fatiguing on the left. Heart rate was increased and stomach sounds decreased. No abdominal rigidity was noted. Both hands and feet were cold to touch. She stated her hands were always like this. Muscle strength was good in both hands. She could remember 5 of a 7-digit number immediately but no numbers 2–3 minutes later. RAM revealed a generalised lack of coordination in both hands but worse on the left. During Romberg’s test, RH fell to the left repeatedly with eyes closed.

MRI and EEG reports showed findings consistent with anoxia. qEEG results showed a significant increase in beta and high beta over the right hemisphere, particularly central regions and occipital regions. Also present were major but fairly localised right hemisphere dysfunction, in particular central to the mid-temporal region. The raw EEG data also revealed what appeared to be an asymmetric ‘spindle coma’ pattern, which is responsible largely for the significant increase in beta/high beta over the right hemisphere. These findings are consistent with anoxic injury or dysfunction, especially triggered by high doses of barbiturates.

Case 19.4

Examination findings

Neurological testing

Eye movements: left end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;

Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;

Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;

Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;

Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;

Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;

Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;

OPK testing revealed normal function;

Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;

The patient expressed a mild right-sided pyramidal paresis;

On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left;

The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;

The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the dorsum of the left foot and lateral foot areas (L5, S1 dermatomal distributions), which were numb to touch; extinction test was negative;

Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in all dermatomes with the exception of the left L5, S1 dermatomes;

Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles but the left peroneal muscles were at 3;

Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue with the exception of the left S1 reflex, which was absent;

Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;

Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:

Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present on the left from L1 to L5 and left piriformis trigger points were also noted.

Case 19.5

Examination findings

Neurological testing

Eye movements: right end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;

Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;

Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;

Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;

Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;

Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;

Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;

OPK testing revealed dyskinetic movements and hypermetria of return phase;

Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;

The patient expressed a mild right-sided pyramidal paresis;

On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left with eyes closed;

The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;

The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the left hand and arm, which were numb to touch; extinction test was negative;

Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in the all dermatomes with the exception of the C6 dermatome on the left;

Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles of the upper and lower extremities;

Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue; however, the left C5 reflex initiated a tingling sensation in her left arm;

Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;

Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:

Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present bilaterally from T1 to T5.

Differential diagnosis

A number of diagnostic possibilities were considered in this case:

A final working diagnosis of migraine syndrome secondary to right hemisphericity was made and treatment instituted on that basis.

Case 19.6

Examination findings

Neurological testing

Eye movements: right end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;

Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;

Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 2.0/1.0 in the left eye with normal fundal appearance;

Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;

Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;

Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;

Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;

OPK testing revealed dyskinetic movements and hypermetria of return phase;

Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;

Romberg’s challenge could not be performed because of non-weight bearing condition of the patient;

The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;

The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the left leg, which was numb to touch; extinction test was negative;

Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in all the dermatomes;

Muscle strength was 4 in all muscles of the upper and lower extremities with the exception of the muscles of the left leg, which could not be tested due to pain;

Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue;

Dermatographia was present bilaterally in the legs, with gross flare response on the left leg;

Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;

Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:

Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present bilaterally from T1 to T5.