19 Approaches to patient management
Introduction
Perhaps the greatest challenge in clinical functional neurology is integrating the theoretical knowledge that one has acquired and results obtained via practical testing into a coherent approach that can be applied to a patient’s presentation. This is so challenging because everything that happens to us in our daily lives can in some instances be important clinically and in others not matter in the slightest. Everyday events involving sensory stimulation, deprivation, and learning can effectively weaken synaptic connections in some circumstances and strengthen them in others. Just because structural or functional changes may not initially be detected following clinical examination does not rule out the possibility that important biological changes are nevertheless occurring. They may simply be below the level of detection with the techniques available to us.
Case 19.1
Presenting complaint
TWB is a 17-year-old male who presented with learning disabilities and inability to concentrate.
Physical examination
• Right pupil response shows TND;
• Visual tracking was dyskinetic with loss of maintained focus;
• Rhomberg’s test: patient fell to the left;
• Rapid alternating movements (RAM): demonstrated left hand uncoordinated compared to right;
• Tandem walking: within normal limits;
• Finger to nose test: patient repeatedly missed target bilaterally but worse with the left hand;
• Single foot standing: showed worse balance on left foot;
• Reflexes: hyperresponsive on right at C5, C6, L4, S1 levels;
• Muscle strength: within normal limits bilaterally in both upper and lower limbs;
• Hearing: within normal limits bilaterally;
• Heart rate: 72, normal sinus rhythm;
• Respirations: 28 per minute;
• Abdominal examination: negative; and
• Forehead skin temperature: 35.5°C on the left and 34.8°C on the right.
Treatment
• Supplementation: omega 3 fish oils, omega 3 cofactors, vitamin B complex, CoQ10; these supplements were started at double daily dose for 2 weeks to saturate the system, then dropped to a normal daily dose.
• Breathing exercises to slow down his breathing patterns and increase the pH of his blood;
• Manipulation was applied two times per week to spinal motion segments and peripheral extremity joints on left side of his body, which expressed dyskinetic hypomobility;
• Sound therapy involved listening to Mozart 10 minutes per day both ears; and
• Spatial rearrangement exercises involved the task of completing jigsaw puzzles with only his left hand for 10 minutes per day.
Discussion
ADHD is thought to occur as a result of an inability of the individual to maintain attention on a primary task because of an inability to inhibit or suppress motor responses to incoming sensory stimuli (Barkley 1997). Some consistency has been found in people with dysfunctions of the right frontal cortex in that they express great difficulty in suppressing motor responses to incoming sensory stimuli (Sergeant 2000). The right frontal cortex functions in some manner to inhibit inappropriate motor responses in a normally functioning brain. The activity of the right frontal cortex relies heavily on the dentato-ponto-cortical and dentato-rubral-thalamo-cortical pathways. Asymmetric reduction in afferent information to the cerebellum because of asymmetric dysfunctional peripheral afferent pathways may cause diaschisis in functional circuits downstream from the cerebellum, in this case the contralateral cortex. In this case, the application of manipulation to increase the afferent stimulus received by the cerebellum and other therapies aimed at increasing the activation of the right frontal cortex were successful in reducing the patient’s symptoms and ultimately his state of disability.
Case 19.2
Examination findings
Neurological testing
• Eye movements: left end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;
• Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;
• Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;
• Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;
• Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;
• Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;
• Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;
• Opticokinetic (OPK) testing revealed dysmetria when tracking from left to right;
• Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;
• The patient expressed a mild left-sided pyramidal paresis, and a visible, regular, left-sided hand tremor on observation;
• On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left;
• The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;
• The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands; extinction test was negative;
• Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in the C5–T1 dermatomes;
• Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles but the left bicep, which was 3;
• Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue;
• Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;
• Trigeminal nerve testing revealed an area of decreased sensation to prick in the left medial maxillary area;
• Oral examination revealed increased right-sided scarring on the tongue and a right palatal paresis; tongue strength and protrusion were both good;
• Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:
Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present on the left from C1 to T1.
Discussion
I have included this case for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is important for manipulating practitioners to understand that the manipulations they give are, for the most part, helpful to the patient; however, they can also hurt the patient when delivered in an inappropriate fashion (Carrick 1997). Secondly, it is important for functional neurologists to know how to handle this type of case because these cases tend to be referred to us for an opinion at some point.
Case 19.3
CH, RH’s mother, accompanied RH to this assessment and related the history.
Examination findings
MRI and EEG reports showed findings consistent with anoxia. qEEG results showed a significant increase in beta and high beta over the right hemisphere, particularly central regions and occipital regions. Also present were major but fairly localised right hemisphere dysfunction, in particular central to the mid-temporal region. The raw EEG data also revealed what appeared to be an asymmetric ‘spindle coma’ pattern, which is responsible largely for the significant increase in beta/high beta over the right hemisphere. These findings are consistent with anoxic injury or dysfunction, especially triggered by high doses of barbiturates.
Case 19.4
Examination findings
Neurological testing
• Eye movements: left end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;
• Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;
• Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;
• Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;
• Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;
• Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;
• Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;
• OPK testing revealed normal function;
• Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;
• The patient expressed a mild right-sided pyramidal paresis;
• On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left;
• The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;
• The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the dorsum of the left foot and lateral foot areas (L5, S1 dermatomal distributions), which were numb to touch; extinction test was negative;
• Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in all dermatomes with the exception of the left L5, S1 dermatomes;
• Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles but the left peroneal muscles were at 3;
• Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue with the exception of the left S1 reflex, which was absent;
• Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;
• Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:
Case 19.5
Examination findings
Neurological testing
• Eye movements: right end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;
• Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;
• Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 1.5/1.0 and normal fundal appearance;
• Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;
• Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;
• Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;
• Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;
• OPK testing revealed dyskinetic movements and hypermetria of return phase;
• Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;
• The patient expressed a mild right-sided pyramidal paresis;
• On Romberg’s challenge, the patient fell to the left with eyes closed;
• The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;
• The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the left hand and arm, which were numb to touch; extinction test was negative;
• Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in the all dermatomes with the exception of the C6 dermatome on the left;
• Muscle strength was 5 in all muscles of the upper and lower extremities;
• Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue; however, the left C5 reflex initiated a tingling sensation in her left arm;
• Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;
• Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:
Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present bilaterally from T1 to T5.
Case 19.6
Past history
AV underwent surgery for the removal of ear grommets 9 months prior to presentation. Before administration of the anaesthesia, the nurse noted that AV had a rash on her arms and neck. The anaesthetist also noted the rash but thought that it was not an issue of concern. Following the surgery, AV developed pain and lost motor control of both her legs. She reported to the emergency department and was diagnosed with viral myalgia. Over the next several weeks, AV reported to the emergency room several times and was extensively evaluated with no explanation given for her pain other than viral myalgia. She was discharged to her mother’s care and sent home.
Examination findings
Neurological testing
• Eye movements: right end range nystagmus noted, pursuit tracking was non-uniform and interrupted;
• Accommodation was good with concentric, bilateral, pupillary constriction;
• Retinal ophthalmic exam revealed V/A ratios of 2.0/1.0 in the left eye with normal fundal appearance;
• Visual field challenge revealed equal and concentric fields in both eyes;
• Both eyes showed normal intorsion and extorsion on lateral flexion test;
• Corneal reflexes were present and equal bilaterally;
• Pupillary reflexes showed an increased time to activation and decreased time of fatigue on the left;
• OPK testing revealed dyskinetic movements and hypermetria of return phase;
• Hearing was good in both ears with vibration centrally localised and air conduction greater than bone conduction bilaterally;
• Romberg’s challenge could not be performed because of non-weight bearing condition of the patient;
• The patient was dysdiadochokinetic on the left when challenged with rapid alternating movements of the hands and overshoot of the left hand on finger-to-nose testing;
• The patient indicated bilateral and equal sensation to touch in the arms, legs, and hands with the exception of the left leg, which was numb to touch; extinction test was negative;
• Vibration was felt equally bilaterally in all the dermatomes;
• Muscle strength was 4 in all muscles of the upper and lower extremities with the exception of the muscles of the left leg, which could not be tested due to pain;
• Reflexes were all strong and equal with no fatigue;
• Dermatographia was present bilaterally in the legs, with gross flare response on the left leg;
• Plantar reflex revealed down-going toes bilaterally;
• Spinal motion segment dysfunction was noted at the following levels:
Paraspinal muscle spasms and trigger points were present bilaterally from T1 to T5.
Imaging
Cervical spine AP, lateral, and oblique radiographs were unremarkable. MRI was also unremarkable.
Discussion
When asymmetry of function between hemispheres occurs, as appears to be happening in this case, quite commonly a decrease in the ability of the cortex to excite certain areas of the brainstem including the mesencephalon and other areas, namely the PMRF, ensues. A decreased excitation of the PMRF can result in a decrease in inhibition of the intermediolateral (IML) cell column, which results in increases in sympathetic activity. This can lead to dysautonomia and result in somewhat bizarre symptomatology, including the development of complex regional pain syndrome.