Aortic Ultrasound

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 10/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1426 times

67 Aortic Ultrasound

Introduction

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be a challenging diagnosis to make and a deadly diagnosis to miss. Patients may be asymptomatic until rupture, or they may have vague complaints such as chronic abdominal or back pain. Frequently, these symptoms are misdiagnosed as less deadly processes, such as renal colic.1,2 Once ruptured, time to diagnosis is the biggest determinant of survival.3 Commonly relied on methods of diagnosis, such as computed tomography (CT), may delay care and result in patient decompensation. Bedside ultrasound has emerged as a powerful tool in the diagnosis and disposition of patients with a suspected AAA or rupture of an AAA. When used properly, bedside ultrasound improves the time to diagnosis and survival.4

What We are Looking for

Because the signs and symptoms of an AAA may be vague and nonspecific, bedside ultrasound of the aorta is indicated in the following clinical scenarios: abdominal pain, back pain, flank pain, unexplained hypotension, syncope, cardiac arrest, or known history of an aneurysm.5,6 The goal of bedside ultrasound is to measure the size of the abdominal aorta and exclude the presence of an AAA. When rupture of an AAA is suspected, the peritoneum should also be evaluated with focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) to search for free fluid.

Supporting Evidence

A large amount of research has confirmed bedside ultrasound to be a useful and lifesaving tool in the emergency department (ED). Tayal et al. conducted a prospective study of the accuracy and outcome of bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of AAA by emergency physicians. They evaluated 125 patients suspected of having an AAA with bedside ultrasound. Twenty-nine patients were found to be positive for AAA, for a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 100%. The sensitivity was 100% with a specificity of 98% for 10 of the 27 patients found to have an AAA, and disposition was immediate to the operating room without a confirmatory study.3,7

Another emergency medicine study performed in 2005 evaluated 238 patients who arrived at the ED with symptoms suggestive of a ruptured AAA. Third-year emergency medical residents, trained according to guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians, performed all ultrasound examinations. Thirty-six aortic abnormalities were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100% for this end point in comparison with “gold standard” diagnostic testing.8

Knaut et al. assessed the accuracy of measurements taken by emergency physicians via ultrasound versus measurements taken by CT. They found that in all cases, their measurements approximated those found on CT within 1.41 cm or less.9

Plummer et al. randomized patients to ultrasound versus standard-of-care diagnostics and compared time to diagnosis and to the operating room. Ultrasound improved time to diagnosis (5.4 versus 83 minutes) and improved time to disposition for patients requiring operative intervention (90 versus 12 minutes).4