Anticancer natural products

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 02/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1243 times

Chapter 8 Anticancer natural products

Plants have been the basis of sophisticated medical systems for thousands of years, particularly in China and India, and they have an essential role in health care. The World Health Organization has estimated that 80% of the Earth’s inhabitants rely on traditional medicines for primary health care, and plant products are highly important in the remaining 20% of the population (Farnsworth et al 1985). During the period 1959–1980 approximately 25% of US prescription medicines contained plant extracts, plant constituents or agents that were derived from natural sources. Over 119 chemicals from 90 plants species are important drugs in many countries and three-quarters of these were derived from studying the chemistry of traditional medicines (Farnsworth et al 1985).

Natural products have made an enormous impact on the discovery of compounds that kill cancer cells; in fact, possibly 60% of all cancer drugs that are used clinically are either natural products or owe their origin to a natural source. The most comprehensive study conducted on cytotoxic agents from nature has been carried out by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), a US government agency that has invested in the identification of a number of anticancer drugs.

The National Cancer Institute

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) was established in the USA in 1937 ‘to provide for, foster and aid in coordinating research related to cancer’. This organization has been involved in many of the great discoveries in fundamental research of cancer and particularly in the characterization of cytotoxic natural products. During the 1950s it was realized that there was a need for screening of natural extracts in a discovery programme and the Cancer Chemotherapy National Service Center was set up (Cragg et al 1993). The objectives of this organization were to procure compounds and to screen and evaluate them in a preclinical and, finally, full clinical setting. This service developed into the modern organization known as the Developmental Therapeutics Program (DTP).

Apart from endeavours to find anticancer agents from natural and synthetic sources, the DTP has also initiated a programme to discover and preclinically develop anti-AIDS agents. Being a US government-funded agency, the NCI accepts and screens compounds from many sources, including academics in universities and pharmaceutical companies. This philanthropic activity increases the chances of finding lead compounds with activity against the many types of cancer and against HIV. Much of the early NCI screening focused on natural products produced by fermentation of microbes, such as filamentous bacteria, and, prior to 1960, only a small numbers of plants (1500) were investigated.

Early successes to exploit plants as a source of anticancer agents included the characterization of podophyllotoxin-type lignans from Podophyllum peltatum, and their semi-synthetic derivatives, and vincristine and vinblastine from Catharanthus roseus (Fig. 8.1). These discoveries drove further interest in plants at the NCI, and collections of plant material were expanded to include 60 countries. This collection strategy was quite extensive and, between 1960 and 1982, 114,000 extracts from 35,000 plants species were screened against a number of tumour types (Cragg et al 1993).

Methods to assess antitumour activity are being continually improved and, after 1975, the P388 mouse leukaemia cell line was used to assay for the presence of compounds that are cytotoxic. Following bioassay-guided isolation of the active agents, a secondary screen known as the human xenograft mouse model was used to assess agents with significant activity. In this model, human tumour cells are introduced beneath the skin of mice lacking an immune response. The cells rapidly grow to form a tumour; compounds may then be administered to the mouse and any effects on the reduction in tumour size measured. This mouse model is still used today and cells from different tumour types may be introduced. Any compounds with broad-spectrum activity were prioritized for preclinical development and eventually clinical trials.

Bioassay-guided fractionation of active extracts led to the characterization of a large number of agents from many different natural product classes. Arguably the most significant discovery from the NCI screening programme was named taxol, from Taxus brevifolia (Taxaceae) (Fig. 8.2). The compound had been previously isolated in 1971 by Wall and co-workers and its activity against a melanoma cell line and in the human xenograft model led to its selection for preclinical development in 1977. Initially, there were problems in acquiring large amounts of the compound, but solutions to these problems and the report of its unique mode of action by promotion of tubulin polymerization and stabilization of microtubules against depolymerization increased interest. Taxol (now known as paclitaxel; see below) has excellent activity against ovarian and breast cancers and was approved in the USA by the FDA in 1993.

Another agent of note, again from the group of Wall, is camptothecin from the Chinese ornamental tree, Camptotheca acuminata (Nyssaceae) (Fig. 8.2). Chinese clinical trials were conducted on this agent, which showed promise against a number of different cancer types, including gastric, liver, head, neck and bladder cancers. However, US clinical trials of the sodium salt were terminated due to a limited number of responses. There has been much work on this class of natural product, with two companies (SmithKline Beecham and Daiichi) having developed and released two products: topotecan and irinotecan.

Between 1985 and 1990 the NCI developed a new in vitro screen that uses 60 human cell lines from nine cancer types representing leukaemia, lung, colon, central nervous system (CNS), melanoma, ovarian, renal, prostate and breast cancers. Synthetic or natural products are made up at concentrations ranging from 10–4 M to 10–8 M and then tested against the 60 different tumour cell lines. The data that are acquired from this test system are evaluated to decide if further investigation is warranted (Alley et al 1988, Grever et al 1992).

The results from the screening are reported in a graph format which calculates the potency of the compound against all 60 cell lines in terms of three indicators:

The importance of these three factors is that a fingerprint of a compound’s anticancer activity is generated which can be correlated, using a mathematical model, with test results for known anticancer drugs (Paull et al 1989). This can even give an idea of whether a compound works by a similar mechanism of action as a known anticancer agent such as vincristine. Promising compounds with interesting selective profiles of activity (e.g. activity against one particular cell line) are then retested to confirm the reproducibility of these results. In 1995 a three cell line prescreen was introduced to increase the throughput of compounds whilst not reducing the number of compounds with activity in the 60 cell line assay. These cell lines were from lung, CNS and breast tumour types.

A new acquisition programme was initiated in 1986 with contracts for the cultivation and extraction of fungi and bacteria and the collection of marine organisms and terrestrial plants (Cragg et al 1997). Marine organisms were collected from many diverse locations, including the Caribbean, Australasia, Central and South Pacific, Indian Ocean and Polynesia. Plant material was collected in over 25 countries in the tropical and subtropical regions by specialist organizations with botanical expertise such as the Missouri Botanical Garden, the University of Chicago and the New York Botanical Garden.

Collaborations with the NCI rely on working closely with qualified organizations (e.g. universities, research institutes, botanical gardens) in the source country that has access to the biological diversity. Botanists and biologists from source countries collaborate in collections, which are invaluable to the NCI, and in many cases training is provided and workshops are organized for local personnel so that there is a transfer of expertise in certain areas. The source countries send biomass back to the National Products Repository in Frederick, Maryland. In the past, invitations have been made to local scientists of source countries to visit the NCI for collaborative research in natural products (Cragg et al 1997). This fosters openness and true collaboration between the NCI and source country.

For biomass collection, dried plant material (usually in the dry weight range of 0.3–1.0 kg) and frozen marine organism samples (1 kg) are shipped to Frederick and stored at –20°C, lessening the possibility of sample degradation. Biomass is extracted with methanol/dichloromethane (1:1) and then water to give organic and aqueous extracts which are given NCI numbers and stored at –20°C until required for screening (Cragg et al 1997). The extracts are then tested in the in vitro human cancer cell line screen and active extracts undergo bioassay-guided fractionation to isolate pure natural products. Structure elucidation is carried out using NMR and mass spectrometry. Compounds demonstrating significant antitumour activity are selected for secondary testing in in vivo systems and those with good activity advance to preclinical and, finally, clinical development. During this process there is the opportunity to license compounds out to companies for development; this is the preferred route due to the large costs of conducting the development process.

Importantly, agreements ensure that any royalties that may arise are shared with the country of origin and, as previously mentioned with the Convention on Biodiversity, it is a legal requirement that the collection of organisms is only possible with the ‘prior informed consent’ of the authorities of the source country (see Chapter 5, p. 55).

A full review of antitumour agents is beyond the scope of this text but we will briefly cover the three main sources of anticancer agents (marine sources, plants and microbes), giving selected examples of agents and their sources. The reader is urged to consult the excellent reviews by Cragg and co-workers on this subject (Cragg & Newman 1999, 2000, Cragg et al 1993, 1997).

Marine anticancer natural products

Marine organisms have no history of medicinal use but, because the oceans cover 70% of the Earth’s surface, there is a vast reserve for the discovery of new natural product drugs. This huge environment is home to a fantastic range of diverse organisms and, of the 28 major animal classes, 26 exist in aquatic areas and eight are exclusively aquatic (Cragg et al 1997). Collection of biomass is usually carried out by diving and in some cases submersibles can give access to organisms that occur in deeper sites, although this is a highly expensive procedure.

The discipline of marine natural product chemistry is comparatively new compared to phytochemistry, with relatively small numbers of natural products having been reported. At present there is one marine natural product which is used as an anticancer drug clinically (Ecteinascidin 743, Yondelis), and a number are in clinical trials and their potent activities highlight the future importance of this source. A compound in development worth noting is bryostatin-1, which is a novel macrocyclic lactone derived from the marine bryozoan, Bugula neritina. This compound modulates protein kinase C activity and phase I studies have demonstrated activity against several tumour types. Bryostatin-1 has subsequently been investigated extensively in phase II clinical trials as a single agent and data suggest that it may have potential in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Didemnin B (Trididemnum solidum) was the first marine natural product to enter clinical trials and has recently been shown to induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in a wide range of cell lines. Aplidine (Fig. 8.3) or dehydrodidemnin B, which is structurally related to didemnin B, is a marine depsipeptide obtained from the tunicate Aplidium albicans, originally found in the Mediterranean. Tunicates, which are also known as sea squirts, are organisms that attach themselves to submerged objects and feed by removing microscopic organisms from the water that is drawn through them. Depsipeptides are cyclic peptides that also possess a cyclic ester functional group. Aplidine blocks the cell division cycle in human tumour cell lines and prevents the onset of DNA synthesis. Like didemnin B, it has also been shown to be an inducer of apoptosis in many cell systems. Additionally, using the xenograft assay, grafted into athymic mice, aplidine demonstrated considerable activity against colon, bladder, lung, prostate and stomach tumours, and against melanoma and lymphoma tumours. This agent is currently in clinical trials. Aplidine demonstrates some of the very best features of a natural product, being highly chiral and exhibiting great functionality. Both of these features contribute to the high cytotoxicity of this molecule, which in nature is probably produced by Aplidium species as a chemical defence mechanism.

One of the most promising groups of agents comes from the sea hare (Dolabella auricularia), an herbivorous mollusc from the Indian Ocean which produces cytotoxic linear peptides. An interesting member of this class is dolastatin-10 (Fig. 8.4), an inhibitor of microtubule assembly, currently in clinical trials.

It is possible to synthesize these compounds; their peptide chemistry is highly amenable to the production of many analogues of the dolastatin class of which a number have been synthesized to date.

Perhaps the most interesting antitumour marine compounds and the first anti-cancer drug to come from this marvelous source is ecteinascidin-743, now marketed as Yondelis (Trabectidin) (Fig. 8.5), from Ecteinascidia turbinata, which is a tunicate found in the Caribbean and Mediterranean. Ecteinascidin-743 has very potent activity against a broad spectrum of tumour types in animal models; it binds to the minor groove of the DNA double helix and inhibits cell proliferation, leading to apoptosis of cancer cells. This binding to the minor groove of DNA allows an alkylation reaction to occur between a guanine residue of the DNA and an electron-deficient carbon on the molecule (* in Fig 8.5).

It was shown that ecteinascidin-743–DNA adducts are recognized by the nucleotide excision repair system, which is inherent to each cell and is present to protect the cell from accumulation of mutations and DNA damage. When this repair system encounters the adduct, rather than repairing the cell apoptosis occurs. Of particular interest is that ecteinascidin-743 cytotoxicity only occurs during active transcription of genes; this has obvious potential in cancer cells which rely on increased transcription and translation. Ecteinascidin-743 also inhibits the induction of the gene MDR1, which encodes a membrane pump responsible for multidrug resistance, which can drastically affect the potency of antitumour agents. These characteristics make ecteinascidin-743 unique and this compound was approved as an anticancer drug in combination with doxorubicin, particularly for the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer, in the European Union in 2009.