Allergy and Anaphylaxis

Published on 07/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1612 times

Chapter 75 Allergy and Anaphylaxis

4 How are immunologic reactions in anaphylaxis classified?

The Gell and Coombs classification (1963) described four types of immunologic reactions (see Table 75-1). A fifth type of reaction, termed idiopathic, was added to the classification system several years later.

Table 75–1 Gell and Coombs Classification of Immunologic Reactions

Type Description Mediator
I Immediate hypersensitivity IgE usually
II Cytotoxic or cytolytic IgG, IgM
III Immune complex disease Antigen-antibody
IV Delayed hypersensitivity T cells
V Idiopathic Unknown

6 How frequently do neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) cause anaphylaxis, and what is the mechanism?

NMBDs have long been considered the most common cause of intraoperative anaphylaxis in adults. This is true in all published studies from Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France, Norway, Belgium, and Spain. These drugs have accounted for 54% to 69% of reactions, depending on the study. Within this drug class, succinylcholine and rocuronium are the most common causes. Succinylcholine is a quaternary ammonium ion and is a flexible molecule that can cross-link two IgE molecules more easily than nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with a rigid backbone (e.g., pancuronium or vecuronium).

There are five important points to remember when considering allergy, anaphylaxis, and NMBDs:

image Quaternary and tertiary ammonium ions are present in many drugs, cosmetics, and food products. Sensitization can occur outside of the operating room, and a serious reaction can occur with first exposure to a NMBD.

image Cross-sensitivity between NMBDs can occur in up to 60% of people.

image NMBDs can cause adverse reactions without IgE antibody mediation. This mechanism of action is via direct mast cell degranulation and release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators. Isoquinolinium compounds such as d-tubocurarine, metocurine, atracurium, and mivacurium are more likely to cause mast cell degranulation.

image Anaphylaxis to NMBDs is rare in the United States but is reported more frequently in Europe, especially France. An important recent paper has challenged the results of previous French skin test studies. This investigation found that undiluted rocuronium and vecuronium extracts produced a positive wheal and flare response in 50% and 40% of nonatopic anesthesia-naïve volunteers, respectively. However, a dilution of 1:1000 did not yield any skin response at 15 minutes. Although their study was small (30 healthy adults), the authors questioned the reliability of skin prick testing with undiluted solutions of rocuronium and vecuronium when making the diagnosis of allergy. An accompanying editorial supported the recommendations for using dilute test extracts and suggested that the incidence of NMBD allergy may be overestimated.

image No demonstrated evidence exists for improved outcomes with preoperative screening of sensitivity to NMBDs.

15 What tests can confirm or negate the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in a patient?

In vitro tests:

image Histamine. Histamine has a very short half-life, on the order of minutes. Histamine levels are not usually performed because it is easy to miss the peak, especially if the team is resuscitating the patient.

image Tryptase. Serum tryptase is a protease, and it is a marker only for mast cell degranulation. Its half-life is 2 hours, and the level may remain elevated for a few hours after an acute event. However, occasionally tryptase can be released by mast cells without evidence of IgE, IgG, or IgM antibody mediation. Tryptase levels do not always increase during vancomycin administration or with peanut food allergy.

image IgE, IgG, IgM levels. Total antibody levels are not routinely measured unless there is a concern of immunologic disease (such as multiple myeloma) or absence of certain antibody classes (e.g., congenital IgA deficiency).

image Radioallergosorbent test (RAST). A radioactive marker is used to identify IgE antibodies to a specific antigen. The key point is to isolate and test for the active antigen; otherwise a false-negative result might occur. A substance can have several antigenic components. For example, at least 11 natural rubber latex antigens exist. In the allergy world in general, RAST is considered less reliable (lower sensitivity and lower specificity) than skin testing, although these rates have improved since the introduction of the Pharmacia CAP RAST method.

image Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This test uses enzyme activity rather than radioactivity to measure IgE levels for a specific antigen. Both RAST and ELISA have false-positive and false-negative rates, specific for each test and antigen. The availability of a test and its clinical utility can be very different things.

image Antigens

In vivo tests:

image In vivo tests include skin tests (subcutaneous and intradermal); provocation and challenge tests are performed in an allergist’s office. The tests must be done at least 4 to 6 weeks after a suspected allergic reaction because recent mast cell degranulation may have depleted mediator stores. If skin tests are performed shortly after a reaction, there is the possibility of a false-negative result. Antihistamines must be discontinued 5 days before skin testing. Skin testing can demonstrate whether hypersensitivity is mediated by antibodies; skin tests do not evaluate whether a nonantibody-mediated sensitivity reaction has occured (e.g., nonspecific mast cell degranulation, which is a side effect of some medications).

image Skin tests are available for NMBDs, propofol, fentanyl, latex, chlorhexidine, and local anesthetics. Skin testing before local anesthetics are needed is helpful, especially if the diagnosis is unclear. Although skin testing is the best available method for identification of sensitivity to NMBDs, it is not infallible. Anaphylaxis to cisatracurium after negative skin testing has occurred. The sensitivity and specificity of skin tests to NMBDs are greater than 95%. No skin tests exist for cefazolin, hydromorphone, or midazolam.

image Penicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen) is a commercially available skin test reagent to look for IgE antibodies associated with penicillin. It is positive in up to 85% of patients with β-lactam allergy. The remaining 15% of allergic patients react to minor determinants. These antigens are not commercially available and are prepared in a few specialty centers only for in-house use. Curiously, the anaphylactic reactions are seen more commonly in patients who react to the minor determinants of penicillin.

Bibliography

1 Baumgart K.W., Baldo B.A. Cephalosporin allergy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:380–381.

2 Brozovic G., Kvolik S. Anaphylactic reaction after rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:72–73.

3 Cohen S.G. The Pharaoh and the wasp. Allergy Proc. 1989;10:149–151.

4 de Leon-Casasola O., Weiss A., Lema M.J. Anaphylaxis due to propofol. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:384–386.

5 Djonneur G., Combes X., Chassard D., et al. Skin sensitivity to rocuronium and vecuronium: a randomized controlled prick-test study in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:986–989.

6 Goodman E.J., Morgan M.J., Johnson P.A., et al. Cephalosporins can be given to penicillin-allergic patients who do not exhibit an anaphylactic response. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:561–564.

7 Kay A.B. Advances in immunology: allergy and allergic diseases. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:30–37.

8 Kay A.B. Advances in immunology: allergy and allergic diseases. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:109–113.

9 Laxenaire M.C. Epidemiology of anesthetic anaphylactoid reactions. Fourth multicenter survey (July 1994-December 1996). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1999;18:796–809.

10 Laxenaire M.C. Substances responsible for perianesthetic anaphylactic shock. A third French multicenter study (1992–1994). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1996;15:1211–1218.

11 Leung D.Y.M., Sampson H.A., Yunginger J.W., et al. Effect of anti-IgE therapy in patients with peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:986–993.

12 Levy J.H. Anaphylactic reactions to neuromuscular blocking drugs: are we making the correct diagnosis? Anesth Analg. 2004;98:881–882.

13 Mertes P.M., Laxenaire M.C. Adverse reactions to neuromuscular blocking agents. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004;4:7–16.

14 Moneret-Vautrin D.A., Morisset M., Flabbee J., et al. Epidemiology of life-threatening and lethal anaphylaxis: a review. Allergy. 2005;60:443–451.

15 Oettgen H.C., Martin T.R., Wynshaw-Boris A., et al. Active anaphylaxis in IgE-deficient mice. Nature. 1994;370:367–370.

16 O’Sullivan S., McElwain J.P., Hogan T.S. Kinin-mediated anaphylactoid reaction implicated in acute intra-operative pulseless electrical activity. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:771–772. (comment)

17 Richet C. Nobel Prize presentation speech, 1913. In Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine, 1901–1921. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1967.

18 Vetter R.S. Wasp or hippopotamus? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:196. (letter)