AIDS, Secondary Immunodeficiency and Immunosuppression

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2161 times

Chapter 17 AIDS, Secondary Immunodeficiency and Immunosuppression

Summary

Nutrient deficiencies often lead to impaired immune responses. Malnutrition increases the risk of infant mortality from infection through reduction in cell-mediated immunity, including reduced numbers and function of CD4+ helper cells and a reduction in levels of secretory IgA. Trace elements, iron, selenium, copper, and zinc are also important in immunity. Lack of these elements can lead to diminished neutrophil killing of bacteria and fungi, susceptibility to viral infections, and diminished antibody responses. Vitamins A, B6, C, E, and folic acid are likewise important in overall resistance to infection. Proper diet and nutrition, therefore, reduce morbidity and mortality caused by infection.

Some drugs selectively alter immune function. Immunomodulatory drugs can severely depress immune functions. These drugs are often necessary to treat solid organ transplant patients and those with an autoimmune disease. Although necessary in such settings, these drugs are often broad acting, thereby increasing patients’ susceptibility to a broad array of opportunistic infections caused by viruses, bacteria and fungi.

HIV is a primary cause of immunodeficiency. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a retrovirus that predominantly targets CD4+ T cells. Acute infection depletes CD4 T cell subsets and transiently suppresses circulating CD4 T cell numbers before the immune system establishes partial control of the virus and the chronic phase of infection begins. Though patients can remain in the chronic phase for an average of 10 years, without anti-retroviral drug treatment, CD4 T cell levels gradually fall, resulting in loss of cell-mediated immunity and susceptibility to life-threatening opportunistic infections. This final stage, AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome), is marked by low CD4 T cell counts, high HIV plasma levels, reactivation of other latent infections, and often, virus-associated malignancies such as Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Combination therapy for AIDS with inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase, protease, and entry are reasonably successful, but associated with long-term toxicities in almost 50% of persons. An effective vaccine remains an elusive goal, in part due to the rapid mutation rate of the virus during reverse transcription.

Nutrient deficiencies

Globally, malnutrition is the most common cause of immunodeficiency. The connection between nutrition and immunity has a long historic record with periods of famine preceding periods of pestilence. As a primary diagnosis, malnutrition is a treatable problem that can range from severe protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) to marginal deficiencies in a single micronutrient. Immune responses are significantly impaired when calories, macronutrients or any key micronutrients are in limiting supply, leaving the undernourished at increased risk for infection.

Infection and malnutrition can exacerbate each other

Malnutrition and infection act synergistically to depress immunity and increase morbidity and mortality. Presence of infection often exacerbates the malnourished state by:

Once this cycle begins, it is self-propagating as infection compromises immunity, which then leads to more infection and debility (Fig. 17.1). At a population level, this may lead to decreased productivity, further decreasing economic and food resources and, again, driving the malnutrition and immune deficiency loop.

Risk factors for malnutrition include poverty, food scarcity, illiteracy, and chronic debilitation. The impacts of malnutrition are seen globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates worldwide, 50% of childhood deaths are due to malnutrition, many in developing nations. However, malnutrition is not just a problem of the poorest countries. In the USA, it is estimated that less than 50% of the elderly are adequately nourished, and even within populations that consume adequate calories, poor dietary nutrient intake can cause marginal nutrient deficiencies with a significant detrimental impact on morbidity and mortality.

Addressing the individual impact of any single micronutrient on immune function is difficult as the malnourished often present with multiple deficiencies. In order to understand the role of nutrients in immune function, many studies have assessed the correlates of both PEM and individual micronutrients on infection rates and immune responses. For example, in one study of surgical and trauma patients, those who presented with lower levels of serum albumin were found to have an increased risk for infectious complications. In addition to such population studies, both in vitro studies on human immune cells and in vivo animal studies have helped elucidate the direct effects of malnutrition on immunity. In some cases, the mechanisms underlying the effects of single nutrient-deficient diets have been determined. We present an overview of these findings below.

Protein–energy malnutrition and lymphocyte dysfunction

Though not all of the underlying mechanisms are clear, multiple studies have correlated PEM with defects in all aspects of the immune system defense, but especially cell-mediated immunity. Lymphoid atrophy is a prominent morphological feature of malnutrition. The thymus, in particular, is a sensitive barometer in young children and the profound reduction in weight and size of the organ effectively results in nutritional thymectomy. Both increased apoptosis of immature CD4+CD8+ thymocytes and a decrease in proliferation contribute to thymic involution. Atrophy is evident in the thymus-dependent periarteriolar areas of the spleen and in the paracortical section of the lymph nodes. Decreases in the thymic hormones, thymulin and thymopoeitin, accompany this loss in cellularity. Histologically:

Thus, with PEM there is a significant decrease in circulating T cell numbers, with CD4 T cells disproportionately affected giving a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Functional studies in mice fed protein-deficit diets have shown that both low T cell precursor number and decreased proliferative response of the remaining lymphocytes upon antigen encounter contribute to an inability to clear viral infection.

Mechanistically, PEM may contribute to lymphocyte functional deficits due to limits in the availability of the amino acid glutamine, required for both nucleotide synthesis and cytokine production, as well as by the increase in oxidative stress. PEM additionally causes imbalances in the neuroendocrine signals affecting lymphocyte survival. Glucocorticoids, released during stress, are increased with PEM, while leptin levels are decreased. Leptin, a hormone released from adipose tissues, has pleiotropic effects, but in mice it can protect thymocytes from glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. It is not surprising then, that PEM significantly diminishes cell-mediated immunity.

B cell functional deficits are less pronounced in PEM. Although serum antibody levels are usually normal, clinical studies have found a reduction in the secretory IgA antibody response to common vaccine antigens, which may contribute to a higher incidence of mucosal infections.

Nutrition also affects innate mechanisms of immunity

Poor nutrition also causes deficits in innate immune defenses, for example,

Deficiencies in trace elements impact immunity

Zinc is one of several trace elements essential for optimal immune system function. WHO estimates that about one third of the world’s population is affected by some level of zinc deficiency. At particular risk are populations with plant-based diets, as fiber and phytate in plant foods inhibit zinc absorption. Similar to protein deficiencies, zinc deprivation can cause severe progressive involution of the thymus, with significant, rapid reduction in thymic weight, primarily due to cortical region loss. Zinc is a structural element both in the peptide hormone, thymulin, as well as in many transcription factors. Thus, reduction in the activity of thymulin contributes to thymic and lymphoid atrophy, and decreased activity of factors such as NFκB prevents adequate IL-2 and IFNγ production impairing cell-mediated immune responses. NK cell lytic activity is also diminished with zinc deficiency.image

Zinc deficiency during pregnancy has also been shown to have an inter-generational effect on the levels of IgM and IgM producing B cells in the pups, and more surprisingly even in the 2nd generation (Fig. 17.w1).

Iron deficiency results in a reduced ability of neutrophils to phagocytose or kill bacteria and fungi as well as decreased lymphocyte response to mitogens and antigens, and impaired NK cell activity. Iron is a double-edged sword as iron-dependent enzymes have crucial roles in lymphocyte and phagocyte function while iron bioavailability favors growth of many microorganisms.

Selenium, incorporated as the amino acid selenocysteine, is an important component of the antioxidants catalase and glutathione peroxidase. In vitro, selenium deficiency leads to decreased T cell responses, decreased NK cell function, and altered cytokine production. There is some correlation between low selenium levels and disease progression in HIV-infected patients, and with increased viral titers in patients receiving attenuated polio virus; however, the impact of selenium supplementation on anti-viral immunity remains unclear.

Vitamin deficiencies and immune function

Singular deficiencies in vitamins B1, B6, and B12 are rare; however, as with all nutrients, severe deficits impact immune responses. In vivo studies examining the effects of B vitamin deficiencies, both in humans and animal models, typically show impairment of thymic and lymphoid cellularity, decreased proliferative responses, and decreased antibody production. Vitamin C and vitamin E have known antioxidant functions. Serum Vitamin C levels quickly diminish with stress or infection. Treatment of DCs in vitro with vitamin C can mediate p38 and NFκB activation augmenting IL-12 secretion. Vitamin E treatment of macrophages, via its antioxidant role, can decrease production of PGE2.

Other work has likewise documented the immunoregulatory effects of Vitamin A on immune function. Vitamin A deficiency, which is endemic in developing nations, impairs epithelial and mucosal barriers, leading to hyperplasia, loss of mucus-producing cells, and susceptibility to gastrointestinal infection. Additionally, there is a reduction in the number and function of certain lymphocyte subsets, especially those of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, contributing to overall defects in IgA levels.

Until the advent of antibiotics, cod liver oil and sunlight, both sources of vitamin D, were used as primary treatments for TB. Vitamin D deficiency can lead to increased infection rates and recent studies have begun to elucidate some of the molecular mechanisms behind the anti-infective role of vitamin D. Many cell types express the vitamin D receptor (VDR), and while vitamin D metabolites may modulate adaptive immune responses, they can also enhance innate immunity. Importantly, particularly for TB, signaling via the VDR may enhance both cathelicidin and defensin expression, thus boosting macrophage anti-microbial activity (Chapter 7).

Multiple studies in vitamin A-deficient animals have shown that supplementation of vitamin A or its metabolites enhances immune responses to vaccination and production of antibodies to both T-dependent and polysaccharide antigens. However, the health benefit of incorporating vitamin A supplements into vaccination programs for diseases such as measles, polio, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus has been equivocal. There is some evidence that failure in some studies to actually correct the vitamin A deficiency may, in part, account for poor results. Finally, it is important to note that malnutrition due to insufficient intake or absorption is rarely one dimensional. Thus, interpretation of such studies where individual micronutrients are supplemented must take into account that other nutrient deficiencies may remain.

Immunodeficiency secondary to drug therapies

Several classes of drugs suppress immune function, either intentionally for therapeutic effect, or as an unwanted side effect.. For example, patients receiving organ transplants usually receive a variety of immunosuppressants to prevent rejection of the donor tissue and to treat graft-versus-host disease (GvHD, discussed in Chapter 21). Likewise, patients presenting with severe inflammatory, allergic, or autoimmune reactions often require therapeutic immunosuppression (Chapter 20 and Section 5). Pharmacological treatments that suppress immunity as a side effect include cancer treatments such as cytotoxic or anti-metabolite reagents that can also severely depress bone marrow hematopoiesis. Below, we will examine the different classes of immunosuppressive drugs commonly used and their impact on immune function.

Iatrogenic immune suppression post-organ transplantation

Due to genetic differences causing the immune system to perceive donor organs as foreign, recipients of organ transplants receive immunosuppressive regimens, often long-term. Essentially the goal of these treatments is to prevent an immune response against either the host or donor tissues while minimizing toxic side effects and susceptibility of the patient to infection. The primary effectors for both donor organ rejection and GvHD are T lymphocytes. Therefore, both prophylactic and therapeutic immunosuppressant drugs target the T cell branch of the immune system. We briefly summarize transplantation immunology and drugs that help prevent rejection below and Chapter 21 covers these subjects in more detail.

Approaches to suppress T cell-mediated damage include interfering with:

Drugs such as cyclosporin A and tacrolimus bind to cellular immunophilins and as a complex inhibit calcineurin (see Fig. 8.w1image). This blockade dampens T cell signaling mediated by NFAT translocation and, in turn, decrease IL-2 and IFNγ production, impairing both T cell activation and proliferation. The drug sirolimus also binds an immunophilin; however, this interaction results in inhibition of the response to, rather than the production of IL-2, again blocking both proliferation and activation in some lymphocyte subsets.

Interference with cellular proliferation is another mechanism of immune suppression. Drugs such as azathioprine, or the more lymphocyte-specific inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil prevent B and T cell proliferation by affecting DNA synthesis.

Glucocorticosteroids and their functional analogs are potent anti-inflammatory drugs with effects on all branches of the immune response. In light of their widespread use, we have included a more detailed discussion of this class of drugs below.

Glucocorticoids are powerful immune modulators

Among the pharmacological agents that dampen immune responses, the glucocorticoids have the broadest application. Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects that vary with both dose and duration of use; however, they are perhaps best known for their potent anti-inflammatory effect. They have been the front-line drugs for decades in the treatment of a variety of inflammatory and allergic conditions, and continue to be a major component of immunosuppressive regimens following organ transplantation.

Patients can receive glucocorticoids:

Glucocorticoids are naturally occurring steroids produced by the adrenal cortex. In response to chronic stress or to inflammatory cytokines, a cascade of hormone signals originating in the hypothalamus drives adrenal production of the immunomodulatory steroid, cortisol (Fig. 17.2 and see Fig. 11.17). Cortisol and its analogs are small steroid hormones that readily cross the cellular membrane and bind cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors. Activated glucocorticoid receptors enter the nucleus and can either directly bind DNA to affect gene transcription or regulate expression by disrupting other transcription factor complexes such as NFκB and AP-1 (Chapter 8).

The timeframe of the downstream effects of this transcriptional regulation ranges from several hours to several days, depending on the rate of protein turnover and de novo protein expression that can vary among different pathways effecting changes in the cellular response. More rapid immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids can also occur. In T cells, for example, treatment with steroid analogues impedes activity of the tyrosine kinases, Fyn and Lck.

Functional effects of steroid treatment

Glucocorticoids have significant effects on both the innate and adaptive branches of the immune response. There is profound suppression of inflammatory cytokine secretion (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, IL-12) and chemokine expression. Both contribute to decreased recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages to sites of injury or infection. Glucocorticoids interfere with prostaglandin synthesis, COX2 production, and mast cell degranulation as well. Interestingly, while glucocorticoids enhance both phagocytosis of opsonized antigens and uptake via scavenger receptors, they reduce dendritic cell activation (upregulation of MHC class II and costimulatory B7 molecules).

Within the adaptive branch of immunity, profound downregulation of the inflammatory cytokines and the response of T cells to these cytokines preferentially shift the adaptive immune profile from TH1 toward a TH2-type (Chapter 11). In particular, glucocorticoids suppress both DC production of IL-12 and T cell expression of the IL-12 receptor. In contrast, the effect of corticosteroids on B cell responses is less profound. Thus, overall, humoral immune responses dominate cell-mediated responses during glucocorticosteroid treatment.

While glucocorticoids are an invaluable tool, particularly for controlling inflammatory processes, they are often used for only short periods due to the risk of potent side effects. In administering any of the immunosuppressant drugs, physicians must weigh the therapeutic benefits against the risks of broad immunosuppression. Thus, the pharmacologic challenge that remains is to develop drugs that target only those immune responses involved in the disease process or organ rejection while leaving intact as much of the overall immune system functional as possible. This remains a somewhat elusive goal due to the highly integrated nature of the immune system wherein disturbance of one branch affects the function of the others.

Other causes of secondary immunodeficiencies

There are several other clinical conditions that lead to immune suppression and increased susceptibility to infection. Many chemotherapy regimens, as well as irradiation treatment for cancer, target rapidly dividing cells and cause loss of bone marrow precursor cells. Similarly, cancer metastases to the bone and leukemia involving bone marrow may decrease bone marrow output, or lead to generation of immature or atypical leukocyte populations. Major surgery and/or trauma, as well as chronic stressors or debility and advanced age all correlate with diminished immune function, in part due to the upregulation of endogenous glucocorticoids. Last, viral infections can cause loss of immune function.

Human immunodeficieny virus causes AIDS

Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is second only to malnutrition in causing immune deficiency and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. HIV is a retrovirus whose primary cellular targets upon infection are CD4+ T cells, DCs, and macrophages. Untreated, HIV leads to depletion of the immune system or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), leaving the host susceptible to fatal opportunistic infections. Disease caused by normally non-pathogenic infections, such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, cytomegalovirus retinitis, and cryptococcal meningitis occur, as do cancers such as Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Present primarily in blood, semen, vaginal secretions, and breast milk of infected individuals, HIV is primarily transmitted via unprotected sex, contaminated needles/blood products, or vertically from mother-to-child during the perinatal period. Globally, more than 30 million people are living with the virus, with 2–3 million newly infected and an estimated 1.6–2.1 million deaths each year (WHO estimates, 2009). Over 25 million people have died from AIDS since the descriptions of the first cases in 1981.

There are two main variants, HIV-1 and HIV-2:

HIV life cycle

HIV is a single-stranded RNA lentivirus. Each enveloped virion contains two copies of the 10-kilobase genome, each encoding nine genes flanked at each end by a long-terminal repeat sequence (LTR). The LTR are essential for integration of viral DNA into the host chromosome and also provide binding sites for initiating replication.

The HIV genome contains gag (core proteins), pol (reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase enzymes), and env (envelope protein) genes (Fig. 17.3). In addition to these three main gene products, the virus encodes six regulatory and accessory proteins (Tat, Rev, Vpr, Vpu, Vif, and Nef). Alternatively spliced transcripts with overlapping open reading frames allow the coordinated expression of these proteins from the compact HIV genome.

HIV targets CD4 T cells and mononuclear phagocytes

HIV primarily targets CD4+ T cells, CD4+ macrophages, and some dendritic cells (DC). Env encodes a 160 kDa precursor of the envelope glycoproteins and proteolytic cleavage generates gp120 and gp41. Infection of the target cells requires initial attachment of gp120 to the major receptor, CD4. Viral entry also requires additional binding through co-receptors, most commonly the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4. Once bound to the cells, interaction via gp41 mediates cell-virus fusion. Upon entry of the HIV capsid, reverse transcription of the RNA genome generates cDNA that subsequently integrates into the host DNA. These latter two steps occur primarily within activated cells.

Differences in the envelope glycoprotein sequence determine whether the virus can utilize the chemokine receptors CCR5 or CXCR4, or both. HIV variants that utilize CCR5 or CXCR4 are referred to as R5 or X4 viruses, respectively. R5 viruses, therefore, can infect memory CD4 T cells and mononuclear phagocytes expressing CCR5. R5 tropism predominates early in HIV infection, while X4, R5, and R5/X4 dual tropic variants may be found in patients during later stages. Individuals homozygous for a 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 allele (CCR5Δ32) are highly resistant to HIV infection by R5 viruses, but remain susceptible to infection with R4 virus. Other receptors for HIV include DC-SIGN on dendritic cells and galactosyl ceramide (GalC), a major binding site for infection within the brain, gut, and vagina.

Viral latency is associated with chronic infection

Without anti-retroviral treatment, HIV levels peak 3–4 weeks post-infection, then gradually drop and plateau (Fig. 17.4). This reflects a combination of the decrease in readily available activated targets and, perhaps more importantly, control by the innate and adaptive immune responses. There is usually a moderate rebound in circulating CD4 T cell numbers at this point, though recent studies indicate GALT CD4 T cell populations do not recover. Simultaneously, the virus establishes stable viral reservoirs. This first consists of cells supporting low-level viral replication in lymphoid and other tissues, likely with efficient cell-to-cell propagation of the virus. The second reservoir is within CD4 T cells in which the HIV genome is integrated as a provirus, yet remains latent as a silent infection without viral protein transcription. Subsequent T cell activation can then stimulate virus production.

image

Fig. 17.4 Natural history of HIV virus

A typical course of HIV infection.

(Courtesy of Dr AS Fauci. Modified with permission from Pantaleo G, Graziosi C. N Engl J Med 1993;328:327–335. Copyright 1993 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.)

The plasma viral load after acute infection recedes (viral set point) can be an indicator for disease progression. The average period of stable infection is 10 years with mean plasma viral load of ~30 000 copies/mL. Rapid progressors can experience increases in viremia, CD4+ cell depletion, and onset of opportunistic disease in as soon as 6 months. Plasma viral RNA levels of >100 000 copies/mL 6 months after infection are associated with a 10-fold greater risk of progression to AIDS with 5 years as compared to patients with HIV plasma load of <100 000 copies/mL. In contrast, long-term non-progressors (LTNP) generally have a lower viral set-point and may remain asymptomatic for more than 25 years with stable CD4 T cell numbers. During this chronic infection period active immune responses keep viral levels in check. Most infected individuals are asymptomatic during this period but can still transmit infectious virus to others.

Immune dysfunction results from the direct effects of HIV and impairment of CD4 T cells

The chronic phase of HIV infection is marked by persistent generalized immune activation. Infected persons present with B cell polyclonal activation and hypergammaglobulinemia. Attachment of gp120 to mannose binding lectin and to subsets of Ig+ B cells contributes to this activation. Inflammatory cytokines such as IFNα, IFNγ, IL-18, IL-15, and TNFα are elevated during acute infection. Finally, increased translocation of bacteria through the gut barrier, due to extensive HIV infection within the GALT and lamina propria, increases circulating LPS levels, activating many immune effectors via Toll-like receptors. In patients with high viral load, HIV-specific CTL typically contain low levels of intracellular perforin (see Figs 10.10 and 10.12) and have a poor proliferative capacity. During this chronic phase, CD8 T cells often express PD-1, a receptor associated with programmed cell death (Chapter 8). The points above are all consistent with persistent activation and eventual exhaustion of the supply of anti-HIV CD8 T cells that worsens over time.

Of equal if not greater impact on overall immune dysfunction from HIV infection, however, is the loss of the CD4 T cells. Though circulating CD4 T cell counts often rebound (at least quantitatively if not qualitatively) to pre-infection levels after the acute phase, they do not recover within the mucosal associated lymphoid tissues. Furthermore, in untreated patients, CD4 T cell levels eventually decline though they may remain above critical levels for a period of 6 months to 10 years.

CD4 T cell loss is due to direct killing by HIV and activation-induced apoptosis. Additionally, infected CD4 T cells present both gp120 and HIV peptide:HLA complexes on the cell surface leaving them subject to anti-HIV B and CTL clearance. Ongoing loss of CD4 T cell help ultimately contributes to the collapse of the CD8 T cell response as demonstrated experimentally by the ability to rescue anti-HIV CD8 T cell functionality by replacing the lost CD4 T cell population. However, progressive immunodeficiency is a hallmark of HIV and the eventual diminished CD4 T cell levels correlate tightly with the subsequent progression to advanced disease and death.

AIDS is the final stage of HIV infection and disease

Progression to this clinical stage includes a CD4 T cell count of <200/μL. As blood CD4 T cell counts gradually decline during the chronic phase, patients become susceptible to opportunistic infection and malignancies (see Fig. 17.4). Below 500 CD4 cells/μL, less severe conditions such as oral candidiasis, recurrent herpes virus outbreaks (e.g. shingles from varicella zoster virus and anogenital herpes from herpes simplex virus), and pneumococcal infections occur. CD4 T cell levels below 200/μL are associated with increased risk of life-threatening infections and malignancies including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and Kaposi’s sarcoma, respectively. With CD4 levels below 50/μL, patients become vulnerable to additional systemic infection with organisms such as Mycobacterium avium complex. The three main organ systems affected are the respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, and central nervous system.

Pneumonia Pneumocystis jirovecii (previously P. carinii) is the most common opportunistic respiratory infection (Fig. 17.5), but pulmonary bacterial infections, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, also occur. Protozoa (cryptosporidia and microsporidia) are the most common pathogens isolated in patients with diarrhoea and weight loss (see Fig. 17.5). Enteric bacteria such as Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. may also afflict AIDS patients.

Neurological complications in AIDS are due to direct effects of HIV infection, opportunistic infections, or lymphoma. AIDS-related dementia once affected between 10–40% of patients with other manifestations of AIDS, but with more effective antiviral treatment has become less common. Neurological involvement can be due to a number of pathogens. Cryptococcus neoformans is a fungus and is the most common cause of AIDS-related meningitis. Toxoplasmosis, a protozoal infection, causes cysts in the brain and neurological deficit (see Fig. 17.5). Cytomegalovirus reactivation may cause inflammation of the retina, brain, and spinal cord and its nerve roots, and a polyomavirus (JC virus), which infects oligodendrocytes in the brain, produces a rapidly fatal demyelinating disease – progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS), caused by infection with KS-associated herpes virus (KSHV), is the most common AIDS-associated malignancy (Fig. 17.5). KSHV infections, similar to CMV herpesvirus infections, are often asymptomatic in individuals with competent T cell immunity. With HIV co-infection, however, KSHV titers increase and KS emerges with multifocal lesions (see Fig. 17.5) of mixed cellularity often resulting in widespread involvement of skin, mucous membranes, viscera (gut and lungs) and lymph nodes. KSHV infection can also lead to development of B cell lymphomas, affecting the brain, gut, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen and body cavities such as the pericardial and pleural spaces. KSHV also causes two B cell lymphoproliferative diseases, multicentric Castleman’s disease and primary effusion lymphoma.

Most of the opportunistic infections as well as malignancies, such as KS and Epstein–Barr virus-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, are due to the inability of the immune response to suppress baseline levels of reactivation of latent organisms in the host and in some cases, to ubiquitous organisms to which we are continually exposed. They are difficult to diagnose and treatment often suppresses rather than eradicates them. Relapses are common and continuous suppressive or maintenance treatment is necessary.

An effective vaccine remains an elusive goal

Currently, treatment for HIV focuses on anti-viral drug cocktails that significantly reduce the patient’s viral load. Due to the rapid rate of mutation in the viral genome during replication, single drug therapy nearly always leads to rapid drug resistance. However, by providing the patient with a cocktail of anti-viral drugs, each targeting a different aspect of the viral life cycle, it is possible to prolong the period of time before plasma viral load increases and T cell counts drop. Anti-retroviral therapies, unfortunately, are not a cure, nor can they prevent transmission of the virus.

Despite increasing characterization of adaptive immune responses, the correlates of protection remain to be fully defined, and this has left the field with mostly empiric approaches. Ideally, investigators will develop a vaccine that provides sufficient protection to prevent viral transmission. Encouraging early reports of persons repeatedly exposed to HIV who never became infected suggested that adaptive immune responses, particularly HIV-specific CD8 T cell responses, might be responsible for apparent protection, but this remains somewhat controversial. Such a vaccine will almost certainly also require the induction of broadly neutralizing antibody responses; something that candidate vaccines have yet to achieve. To date there have been clinical trials of numerous candidate HIV vaccines, but most would agree that an effective vaccine remains an elusive goal.

Many in the field believe that a vaccine that protects from disease progression, while not necessarily protecting from the initial infection, is a more realistic short-term goal. Toward this goal, investigators have focused on approaches that induce cellular immune responses, particularly CD8 T cells responses. However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that optimal efficacy will also need to elicit robust CD4 T cell responses to HIV.

As no cure or vaccine is currently available, our main weapon is prevention through health education and control of infection.

Critical thinking: Secondary immunodeficiency (see p. 438 for explanations)

A 52-year-old record producer developed a severe cough with increasing shortness of breath. He also had a fever, chest pain, and malaise. For the week before presentation he complained of pain on swallowing. His past medical history included gonorrhea and genital herpes within the previous 3 years. Over the previous 2 months he had suffered from persistent diarrhea and lost 9 kg in weight from a baseline of 68 kg. He lived with his girlfriend with whom he had been having unprotected intercourse for several years. There was no history of intravenous drug abuse.

On examination he was underweight and had enlarged lymph nodes in the neck, axillae, and groin. Plaques of Candida albicans were visible in his throat. There were abnormal breath sounds in his lungs. The results of his blood tests are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Results of investigations on presentation

Investigation Result (normal range)
hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.8 (13.5–18.0)
platelet count (× 109/L) 128 (150–400)
white cell count (× 109/L) 6.2 (4.0–11.0)
neutrophils (× 109/L) 5.4 (2.0–7.5)
eosinophils (× 109/L) 0.24 (0.4–0.44)
total lymphocytes (× 109/L) 0.75 (1.6–3.5)
T lymphocytes
CD4+ (× 109/L)
CD8+ (× 109/L)
0.12 (0.7–1.1)
0.42 (0.5–0.9)
B lymphocytes (× 109/L) 0.11 (0.2–0.5)
arterial blood gases
PaO2 (kPa)
PaCO2 (kPa)
pH
HCO3
base excess
7.8 (>10.6)
5.52 (4.7–6.0)
7.39 (7.35–7.45)
25.6
–0.9
ECG normal
chest radiography bilateral diffuse interstitial shadowing
bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage positive for Pneumocystis jirovecii

Because of his sexual history, the patient was counseled about having a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test, and consented. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, see Method box 3.2, Fig. 2image) was positive for anti-HIV antibodies and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) demonstrated HIV-1 RNA in the plasma.

Examination of an induced sputum specimen revealed Pneumocystis jirovecii, which together with the positive HIV ELISA is an AIDS-defining illness. Thus a clear diagnosis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) was made and the patient’s P. jirovecii pneumonia was treated with oxygen by mask and parenteral co-trimoxazole. He was discharged from hospital taking oral co-trimoxazole.

Within 3 months he was seen again in accident and emergency with blurred vision and ‘flashing lights’ in his eyes. He was shown to have an infection of his retina with cytomegalovirus and was treated with injections of ganciclovir. The CD4 count at this time was 0.04 × 109/L. While receiving this treatment the patient became increasingly unwell and semiconscious. Investigations at this time are shown Table 2.

Table 2 Results of investigations 3 months after presentation

Investigation Result (normal range)
hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.4 (13.5–18.0)
platelet count (× 109/L) 104 (150–400)
white cell count (× 109/L) 4.1 (4.0–11.0)
neutrophils (× 109/L) 4.2 (2.0–7.5)
eosinophils (× 109/L) 0.24 (0.4–0.44)
total lymphocytes (× 109/L) 0.62 (1.6–3.5)
T lymphocytes
CD4+ (× 109/L)
CD8+ (× 109/L)
0.03 (0.7–1.1)
0.40 (0.5–0.9)
B lymphocytes (× 109/L) 0.09 (0.2–0.5)
chest radiography minimal areas of diffuse shadowing
blood culture negative
blood glucose (mmol/L) 7.6 (<10.0)
CSF from lumbar puncture
Appearance
turbid
white cells (polymorphs/mm3) 2500
protein (g/L) 4.2 (0.15–0.45)
glucose (mmol/L) 4.5 (> 60% blood glucose)
Indian ink stain positive for cryptococcus

A diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis was made and intravenous amphotericin was started. The patient did not respond to treatment and died shortly afterwards. At autopsy, P. jirovecii was isolated from his lungs and evidence of early cerebral lymphoma was noted.