Ventilator-Associated Lung Injury

Acute lung injury and ARDS are recognized as affecting the lungs heterogeneously. The distribution of edema fluid, ventilated versus flooded alveoli, and consequently the matching of ventilation and perfusion vary among gas exchange units. Moreover, it is recognized that the lung is capable of a brisk inflammatory response when injured or when ventilated mechanically, which may have local or systemic manifestations. The ARDSnet trial demonstrated improved outcomes from ALI/ARDS after ventilation with lower V_T and minute ventilation (V_E), resulting in lower airway pressures, less overdistension of recruitable alveoli, less shear stress on lung tissue, and lower mortality despite the paradox that most patients with ALI/ARDS do not die from an inability to oxygenate or ventilate. Rather, most such patients die in association with the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome—which has been linked closely with a rampant systemic inflammatory response. If less ventilation is better, it was hypothesized that more ventilation may be injurious or indeed provocative to the lung—leading to the concept of VILI.

Ventilator-induced lung injury occurs from excessive mechanical stress to the lung, either from excessive V_T or excessive airway pressure. Mechanical ventilation induces a pulmonary and systemic cytokine response, which can be minimized by limiting overdistension and phasic recruitment/derecruitment of lung. A substantial body of experimental and clinical data demonstrates that the mechanism of VILI is the proinflammatory response in the lung and the periphery, and that the response and injury are attenuated by lung-protective ventilation strategies. New modes of ventilation and protective ventilation are designed to minimize the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation, which is a fundamental aspect of critical care management.

Proportional Assist Ventilation

Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) is a form of synchronized partial ventilatory assistance that augments the flow of gas to the patient in response to patient-generated effort. The ventilator augments the patient’s inspiratory effort without using preselected target volume or pressure. The purpose of PAV is to allow the patient to achieve a pattern of ventilation and breathing that is adequate and comfortable. The patient initiates and determines the depth and frequency of the breaths independently of the ventilator. Advantages to this type of ventilator support include greater comfort; reduction of peak airway pressure required to deliver the V_T; less likelihood of overventilation and overdistension of alveoli; preservation and enhancement of the patient’s own reflex, behavioral, and homeostatic control mechanisms; and improved efficiency of negative-pressure ventilation.

Effective use of PAV requires an understanding of the individual patient’s ventilatory mechanics. This entails measuring the patient’s airway resistance, compliance, and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) to determine the ventilatory load and assistance the patient requires. Younes et al. proposed an innovative method for the noninvasive determination of passive elasticity during PAV. Once the patient’s elastance and resistance are determined, the PAV parameters are set followed by PEEP, adjusting the peak pressure limit to 30 cm H₂O, adjusting volume assist to 8% of elastance measured on PAV, and finally observing the patient’s ventilation, breathing pattern, and peak airway pressure. As a new ventilatory method, PAV can conceivably improve patient-ventilator interaction. Its true usefulness remains to be measured, and clinical usage is uncommon.

Pressure-Controlled Ventilation

Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) is pressure-limited timecycled breathing that is completely controlled by the ventilator, with no participation by the patient. Inspiratory airway pressure increases early in the respiratory cycle, and is maintained at that specified pressure throughout the remainder of the delivery phase. The major benefit of PCV relates to the inspiratory flow pattern and its benefit in gas delivery for patients with suppressed respiratory efforts. In pressure-cycled breathing, the inspiratory flow decreases exponentially during lung inflation in order to keep the airway pressure at the preselected value. Thus, this type of flow pattern can improve gas exchange. The primary disadvantage of PCV is the tendency for inflation volumes to vary with changes in the mechanical properties of the lungs. There is a proportional relationship between the lung inflation and the peak inflation pressure. When a constant peak inflation pressure is reached, the inflation volume decreases as the airway resistance increases or lung compliance decreases. The result is fluctuation in inflation volumes due to reliance on a specific pressure target.

Inverse-Ratio Ventilation

Inverse-ratio ventilation (IRV) is a combination of PCV (hence, PC-IRV) with a prolonged inspiratory time (I). One way to increase I is to decrease the inspiratory flow rate, such as increasing the I:expiratory time (E) ratio from the usual 1:4 to 2:1 (up to 4:1). Benefits of IRV include improved oxygenation and the prevention of alveolar collapse as confirmed in cases of ARDS and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. On occasion, the early use of PC-IRV can facilitate tapering of high fractions of inspired oxygen (F_IO₂) and decrease high PEEP and peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs). The downside to PC-IRV is that is can lead to stacking of breaths (auto-PEEP), with high airway pressures, hyperinflation and barotrauma, CO₂ retention, and metabolic acidosis. Another adverse effect observed with IRV is the potential to cause decreased cardiac output due to auto-PEEP because increased transthoracic pressure decreases venous return.

Mandatory Minute Ventilation

Mandatory minute ventilation (MMV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation in which the minimum level of V_E needed by the patient is provided. If the patient’s spontaneous ventilation is insufficient to meet the predetermined V_E, the ventilator provides the difference. Conversely, if the patient’s spontaneous breathing exceeds the target V_E no ventilator support is provided. This mode is one of the so-called “closed-loop” ventilation modes (Table 1) because the ventilator varies its parameters in response to the patient’s own intrinsic ventilatory requirements. The major advantage of MMV is the capability to vary ventilatory support according to the response of the patient. This mode of mechanical ventilation is best suited for patients with severe neuromuscular disease or drug overdose, or patients heavily sedated. One of the main disadvantages with MMV is that alveolar ventilation may not be matched equally with exhaled V_E, thus diminishing closing volumes and leading to atelectasis. None of the closed-loop modes, MMV included, has been tested sufficiently on critically ill patients to recommend widespread incorporation into practice.

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) (Table 2) has been used as an alternative mode of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. APRV, which has been available in some ventilator models since the mid-1990s, allows for the unloading during exhalation of any positive pressure provided during inhalation in order to facilitate the egress of the tidal breath. Release of airway pressure from an elevated baseline simulates exhalation. Technically, APRV is time-triggered, pressure-limited, time-cycled mechanical ventilation. Conceptualizing APRV as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with regular, brief, intermittent releases of airway pressure may facilitate understanding. It can augment alveolar ventilation in the patient breathing spontaneously, or provide full support to the apneic patient.

Advantages of APRV include lower peak airway pressure, lower intrathoracic pressure, lower V_E, minimal effect on cardiac output, and improved matching of ventilation and perfusion. The mode may facilitate spontaneous breathing by the patient. Sedation requirements may be decreased, and neuromuscular blockade should be avoided altogether. Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is believed not to develop. Disadvantages of APRV include pressure control of ventilation, increased effects of airway and circuit resistance on ventilation, decreased transpulmonary pressure, and potential interference with spontaneous ventilation. Facilitated exhalation may make APRV beneficial in patients with bronchospasm or small-airways disease. This mode of ventilation can be used as a weaning mode. Although increasingly popular, the advantage of APRV over other modes of ventilation is unproved.

The terminology of APRV differs somewhat from other modes of mechanical ventilation, and has yet to be standardized. Four important terms include pressure high (P_high), pressure low (P_low), time high (T_high), and time low (T_low). The P_high term describes the baseline airway pressure (the higher of the two pressures), alternatively called CPAP, inflating pressure, or the P1 pressure. The P_low term describes the airway pressure resulting from the release of pressure (alternatively called PEEP, release pressure, or the P2 pressure). The T_high time refers to the time during which P_high is maintained (T1), whereas T_low refers to the duration of time when airway pressure is released (T2). Mean airway pressure can be calculated from the following equation: