Acute Abdomen

Published on 11/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1518 times

Chapter 89 Acute Abdomen

The abdomen is both the primary source of disease conditions that require care in the intensive care unit (ICU), and frequently, is a secondary source of additional pathophysiology for children in the ICU being treated for other conditions. In either case, the early recognition of these conditions and the judicious use of surgical intervention can be key to the successful outcome in the ICU population.

Anatomic and Physiologic Considerations

The Peritoneum

The peritoneum provides a protective environment for the intra-abdominal organs, and, because of its marked sensitivity, a valuable “window” for the examining health care provider. It is composed of a single layer of mesothelial cells lining the abdominal cavity along the abdominal wall (the parietal peritoneum) and the intra-abdominal viscera (the visceral peritoneum). The space between these is the peritoneal cavity. Beneath the mesothelium is a submesothelial layer of extracellular matrix, capillaries, and lymphatics.1 The peritoneum’s sensitivity to inflammation, ischemia, and necrosis is mediated by the fluid in the peritoneum that contains macrophages and other leukocytes.2 Thus, with a focus of inflammation anywhere in the peritoneal cavity, inflammatory mediators are released by these leukocytes, often resulting initially in poorly localized, generalized pain. With irritation of the peritoneum associated with early appendicitis, for example, the patient interprets the inflammation as periumbilical pain. This is related to the embryologic development along dermatomes. As more inflammatory cytokines are secreted throughout the peritoneal cavity, the pain becomes more generalized and will eventually result in spasm of the overlying muscles of the abdominal wall, interpreted by the examiner as guarding.

Pain in the gastrointestinal tract is mainly limited to conditions that result in distention of the organ. Inflammation or irritation of the mucosa is generally not the cause of pain, except in the stomach. Disease states that result in full-thickness inflammation of the bowel wall, however, can stimulate the visceral peritoneum, inciting the release of leukocytic and tissue macrophage derived inflammatory mediators that results in pain. Patients who are receiving drugs such as steroids, which blunt the immune response, have reduced production of these peritoneal inflammatory mediators, and consequently can have deceptively little pain despite a significant intra-abdominal disease. Just as in other parts of the body, ischemia associated with any abdominal condition results in severe pain, often out of proportion to what is detected on physical examination.

Visceral Blood Flow

The regulation of visceral blood flow is a tightly controlled balance of neural, humoral, paracrine, and metabolic factors.3 In the gut, enteral feeding increases the blood flow and the metabolic demands on the intestinal mucosa. Some of these effects are directly related to the nutrients in the intestinal lumen, whereas others are dependent on the enteric nervous system and the associated refexes, on gastrointestinal hormones, and on gastrointestinal vasoactive mediators such as adenosine, endothelin-1, and nitric oxide.4 In pathologic states such as sepsis alone or shock, whether from sepsis, hemorrhage, or cardiac failure, visceral blood flow is reduced, which can lead to ischemia of the intestinal mucosa and submuscosa. Even with restoration of blood pressure and cardiac output after treatment of shock, microvascular perfusion of the intestine may remain impaired resulting in mucosal ischemia and persistent lactate production.

Such ischemia can lead to altered integrity of the mucosal barriers to bacteria and other pathogens, thus increasing the entry of endotoxins into the splanchnic venous and lymphatic systems. These pathogens can fuel the inflammatory response. This finding has fostered the theory of “the gut as a central organ of sepsis or multisystem organ failure.”5 Whether the translocation of bacteria or endotoxin from gut lumen to splanchnic drainage is the chicken or egg can be debated; regardless, this perturbation of intestinal blood flow contributes to the pathophysiology of shock and sepsis.

Other conditions in the ICU can affect splanchnic blood flow, especially mechanical ventilation with high inspiratory pressures, high positive end-expiratory pressure, or high tidal volumes.6,7

Physical Exam of the Abdomen

The examination of the child’s abdomen requires keen observation, patience, and sensitivity to the patient’s fears and their parents’ anxiety. One should first notice the child’s position and demeanor. Children with peritonitis do not move or writhe about the bed because this only worsens their pain, whereas a child with visceral ischemia that has not progressed to peritonitis may be actively seeking a more comfortable position. As mentioned earlier, pain out of proportion to the findings on physical exam in an ICU patient is suggestive of ischemia, independent of the location in the body. Tachycardia is a very sensitive marker for significant intra-abdominal disease and therefore its absence should prompt the examiner to look for other explanations of the reported pain. Observation of the patient’s facial expressions is important throughout the physical exam, especially in nonverbal children.

The exam of a child with abdominal pain should begin by avoiding palpation of the abdomen. Testing for rebound tenderness is only valuable in older children and should be avoided in children younger than adolescence as it is too startling, and thus has a high false-positive rate. Shaking the bed, asking the child to cough, or gently grabbing the hips and moving them from side to side will cause a painful response in conditions with peritonitis and is much less threatening to younger children. Once the manual examination is to begin, the examiners should make certain that their hands and stethoscopes are warm. For the verbal child who has localized the pain to a specific portion of the abdomen, the examiners should start the palpation in the opposite quadrant. In generalized peritonitis, spasm of the rectus abdominis can be detected regardless of where the source of the inflammation is located. When rectus spasm is detected on one side of the abdomen, a comparison to the rectus on the other side is helpful; when both are in spasm, it could be a manifestation of guarding by an anxious child, and therefore distraction should be employed. Distraction can often be created by engaging in conversation with the verbal child, or by using the warmed stethoscope to listen with light pressure over the area of the abdomen in question, followed by gradually increasing the pressure to elicit a response. Asking the child to take a deep breath and “blow it all the way out” while feeling the rectus can overcome the spasm if it is due to voluntary guarding, whereas a child with peritonitis will fail to relax the rectus spasm. Bowel sounds are highly variable and their assessment is not usually useful in the ICU patient.

If palpation in one area causes referred pain in a different location (Rosvig sign), that is suggestive of localized peritonitis in the area of pain, classically seen in appendicitis, but also can be seen in other localized abdominal conditions.

In addition to steroids, other medications can interfere with the reliability of the physical exam of the abdomen. Although patients receiving opiates may have a blunted response to painful stimuli, significant intraperitoneal pathology can still be ascertained by careful observation. Those patients who are receiving paralytic drugs are particularly challenging because the rectus abdominis spasm that is associated with peritonitis may be substantially blunted. Observation of the face, heart rate, or blood pressure can still be valuable, especially by comparing these findings during examination to other areas of the body. Just as in the nonsedated, non-ICU patient, beginning the exam on another portion of the body gives the examiner a baseline for comparison.

Laboratory Tests

Assessment of possible intra-abdominal conditions should include blood and serum tests that measure inflammation, acid-base abnormalities, possible coagulopathy, and those focused on suspected involved organs. The leukocyte count and differential, hematocrit, and platelet count should always be checked for patients with suspected abdominal disease. Leukocytosis, especially with an increased percentage of neutrophils or immature forms should raise one’s concern about an infectious process. Neutropenia suggests a more severe infection or a suppression of the patient’s bone marrow from medications or from the infection; such a situation might make clearance of a bacterial infection more difficult. Similarly, both an increased and decreased platelet count can indicate an intra-abdominal infection. Serial declines in the platelet count are particularly suggestive of a continuing inflammatory consumption seen in conditions such a necrotizing enterocolitis. Hematocrit levels must be followed in any child in the ICU because they can demonstrate intra-abdominal bleeding or hemolysis related to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Other coagulation tests should be considered, especially in children with severe infections or those with liver dysfunction. In such situations the prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, d-dimers, and fibrin split products are helpful to characterize and monitor the coagulopathy.

Abnormalities of acid-base balance should be monitored regularly in a child hospitalized in the ICU with an abdominal disease process. The source of increased acid can either be an overproduction, such as ongoing lactate generation by ischemic bowel, or decreased acid clearance by the liver or kidneys in conditions associated with shock and decreased visceral blood flow. Lactate is a very sensitive measure of intestinal ischemia, especially when monitored serially for trends. Arterial blood samples are more reliable than venous samples in that measurement. Hyperlactemia is not specific to intestinal ischemia and can be associated with any tissue necrosis or underperfusion of organs.

Liver function test, more accurately termed liver injury tests, include transaminases (ALT and AST), bilirubin, and gamma glutamine transferase. These can be elevated with trauma to the liver, active hepatic inflammation, hepatic ischemia, or obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow, known as Budd Chiari syndrome. The latter can result in extremely elevated transaminase levels. Elevation of the gamma glutamine transferase without a significant rise in the transaminase suggests a biliary condition such as common bile duct obstruction or cholecystitis.

Amylase is a valuable diagnostic test for children with abdominal pain or unexplained intra-abdominal sepsis as hyperamylasemia can indicate pancreatitis. Elevated amylase is not specific to pancreatic insults and can be elevated with head trauma, decreased renal clearance, and intestinal obstruction. Serum lipase can be an additive test to the assessment of the pancreas. It tends to be more specific to the pancreas, but can be mildly elevated in intestinal obstruction as well. When both amylase and lipase are markedly elevated, pancreatitis is most likely. Children with a history of severe or chronic pancreatitis might not have marked elevations, so the level of the enzyme does not always correlate with the severity of the disease.

Imaging Options

The reliability of abdominal exam is subjective and highly variable, and may be dependent on the experience of the observer, the fluctuating status of the patient and his or her medications, the patient’s level of anxiety, and many other factors. Consequently, most ICU providers have developed a dependency on imaging studies to ascertain whether intra-abdominal pathology warrants intervention. For reasons of resource efficiency as well as considerations about the potential risks of ionizing radiation, prudence needs to be exercised before ordering expensive, potentially obfuscating data from imaging studies. The following factors should always be evaluated before performing each study:

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography has several advantages over other imaging studies, most notably its portability, which obviates the need for moving the patient and its lack of ionizing radiation exposure. In addition, the use of Doppler modality permits assessment of visceral blood flow to kidneys, pelvic organs, and the gastrointestinal tract. When the relative positions of the mesenteric vein and artery can be accurately determined, an abnormal orientation suggests an increased risk of malrotation, even without midgut volvulus.9 The presence of a “whirlpool sign” can be diagnostic of malrotation with midgut volvulus.10 Neither finding is sensitive enough to exclude the diagnosis of malrotation. Thus, if suspected, malrotation requires an upper gastrointestinal contrast study to assess the position of the duodenal-jejunal junction.11 Assessment of gall bladder wall thickening suggestive of acalculous cholecystitis or biliary tree dilation are particularly accurate. Intra-abdominal and pelvic fluid collections can be identified and characterized well with ultrasonography, suggesting collections that would be suitable for drainage, either surgical or percutaneous, via ultrasound guidance. In the patient with bowel obstruction or severe paralytic ileus, the resultant intestinal distention creates ultrasonic distortion, minimizing the value of this imaging modality.

Computed Tomography

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans are accurate, fairly rapid, and can be used to guide interventional procedures such as percutaneous biopsies or drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections. Except in institutions where CT scans are located in the ICU or those that have mobile CT units, patients must be transported to access imaging with this modality. That requirement can be a significant challenge with children who are ventilated or hemodynamically unstable. In addition to the transport challenges, the radiation exposure of a CT scan may pose a risk for developing malignancies later in life, especially for those children who receive serial radiographs.12 That risk can be reduced by using directed scans (i.e., limiting the scan to the portion of the abdomen in question). Other risks include the administration of intravenous contrast material that can cause anaphylaxis in those who are allergic, or renal injury, especially in those who might already be hypovolemic or receiving nephrotoxic drugs.13 That risk can be minimized as well, by using nonionic contrast materials, or with the administration of sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine before the administration of the intravenous contrast. Administration of enteral contrast can result in aspiration if there is intestinal obstruction or delayed gastric emptying with vomiting or gastroesophageal reflux.

The abdominal CT scan can be very effective at identifying the condition of all the intra-abdominal organs, and the retroperitoneal spaces. It is being used with increasing success to assess for bowel obstruction. Identification of fluid collections and their characteristics can help ascertain whether blood, bile, or pus is present and whether it can be drained percutaneously. To make certain that nonopacification of fluid-filled loops of bowel is not misconstrued for pathologic collections of fluid, enteral contrast should be given as long as no contraindications exist. With intravenous contrast and carefully timed image capture, conclusions about organ perfusion can be assessed as well. Colonic and intestinal ischemia, necrotizing pancreatitis, and decreased renal perfusion can all be seen reliably.

Abdominal Conditions Requiring Intensive Care Unit Care

Perforated Viscera

Children with perforation of the gastrointestinal tract will frequently require either preoperative resuscitation or postoperative stabilization in the ICU. The most common condition resulting in perforation is appendicitis. Although perforated appendicitis is common, occurring in 30% to 50% of children who present to children’s hospitals with appendicitis,15 it is unusual for it to result in serious intra-abdominal sepsis. Nevertheless, deaths do still occur in such children, related most often to septic shock with cardiovascular collapse or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Other sites of perforation in the gastrointestinal tract include gastric perforation from either severe gastritis, gastric ischemia, or after manipulations such as insertion of gastric tubes or transpyloric feeding tubes. In children with chronic gastrostomies, accidental dislodgements or manipulations of the gastrostomy site can result in separation of the stomach from the abdominal wall, leading to spillage of gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity. Because the acidic gastric pH results in lower bacterial counts, such perforations do not usually result in serious intra-abdominal sepsis. However, chronically hospitalized children, or children with gastroesophageal reflux on chronic acid suppression therapies may be colonized with resistant bacterial or fungal organisms such as Candida species that can lead to serious septic consequences.

Ingested foreign bodies can lead to perforation anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, with common items being sharp materials such as pins or nails, fish bones, disc batteries, and magnets.16 Trauma can also result in perforation, notably in lap seat belt injuries from motor vehicle accidents, or in cases of nonaccidental trauma where a punch or kick can compress the small bowel against the vertebral column causing a jejunal perforation. Therefore, characteristic in this mechanism is that the intraoperative finding of a jejunal perforation in the absence of a known trauma history should prompt an evaluation by the hospital’s child abuse team.17

Ischemia

Volvulus of a loop of small intestine can occur when a segment of bowel, typically distal ileum, becomes entrapped beneath an omphalomesenteric remnant. This particular lesion can be very difficult to diagnose as neither contrast enema radiographs nor antegrade upper gastrointestinal contrast studies are likely to reach the involved area of volvulus. In addition, such children will often not have impressive physical exam findings until the bowel has become ischemic. At that point, systemic sepsis can occur rapidly. Similar pathophysiology can develop from a twist of bowel within an internal hernia.

In children with intestinal malrotation, the entire intestine supplied by the superior mesenteric artery (i.e., from jejunum to right transverse colon) can twist, resulting in midgut volvulus. In a somewhat similar manner, the colon alone can twist when there is sufficient redundancy in the mesocolon, typically in the cecum or the sigmoid colon. In any of these situations with intestinal and mesenteric twisting, the resultant venous congestion can compromise the capillary inflow to the bowel wall, ultimately leading to irreversible ischemia if the bowel is not untwisted promptly.

In the pediatric ICU, another cause of intestinal ischemia is low cardiac output or hypoxemia. Children with congenital heart disease, particularly those with single ventricle physiology or severe cyanotic heart disease, can develop mucosal ischemia after cardiac surgery, manifested as pneumatosis intestinalis on radiographs, bloody stool, metabolic acidosis with elevated serum lactate, and sepsis. Children on potent vasoactive pressors such as epinephrine or norepinephrine, and those receiving extracorporeal support, can develop ischemia as well. This is a variant of necrotizing enterocolitis and can involve the entire small intestine, and less commonly the colon. If the diminished cardiac output or hypoxemia is corrected and the ischemia is limited to the mucosa, surgical treatment may be avoided. Resection is necessary if the acidosis or systemic perturbations are refractory or if perforation results. Unfortunately, because this disease can involve the entire gut, the utility of resection may be limited.

Other causes of intestinal ischemia include small bowel obstruction, usually from adhesions after previous laparotomies, or, less commonly, related to incarcerated inguinal hernias. If the bowel becomes sufficiently distended, the intraluminal pressure can exceed the intramural perfusion pressure of the microcirculation, resulting in ischemia. Other, less common causes of intestinal ischemia include conditions that alter the microcirculation of the bowel wall such as vasculitis or hemolytic uremic syndrome.

The systemic physiologic insult of intestinal ischemia is usually proportional to the degree of ischemic tissue. Thus, midgut volvulus or total intestinal involvement with necrotizing enterocolitis can be the most catastrophic of these disease states acutely, and can have the most devastating long-term consequences, with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure a common consequence if the ischemia is irreversible.

Other Specific Conditions

Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is defined as intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) that is >12 mm Hg. Although this is relatively uncommon in pediatric ICU patients, it can be associated with a high morbidity and mortality. If the IAP reaches a point where perfusion to intra-abdominal organs is compromised, a constellation of organ dysfunctions may occur including renal insufficiency, intestinal ischemia, hepatic dysfunction, elevated diaphragms, and respiratory insufficiency.2022 This constellation is termed abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Risk factors for ACS include massive fluid resuscitation for any illness, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, intra-abdominal inflammation or infection from any cause, obesity, and tight abdominal wall closures following laparotomy. As with compartment syndrome in extremities, there is no absolute pressure to define the presence of ACS; the intravascular volume status, blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance are all factors that can impact the perfusion pressure of the abdominal organs and minimize the effect of the IAP. An abdominal perfusion pressure can be calculated as the mean arterial pressure minus the IAP. If abdominal perfusion pressure is > 60 mm Hg, a higher survival rate has been reported. The diagnosis of ACS is made when there is a sustained increased IAP in combination with signs of organ dysfunction such as decreased cardiac output, oliguria, and respiratory insufficiency. Other organ systems that can be affected by IAH include the reduction of portal and mesenteric venous flow, potentially leading to hepatic dysfunction and intestinal edema and ischemia. In addition, the increased intrathoracic pressure that can result from the elevated diaphragms can raise intracranial pressure.

When signs of IAH are evident in the setting of abdominal distention, pressure measurements can be made using nasogastric tubes, rectal catheters, bladder catheters, and peritoneal drainage tubes such as peritoneal dialysis catheters. The most reliable and easily practical measurement can be obtained using a closed system of a Foley bladder catheter connected to a fluid column and a pressure measuring device such as a tube manometer or a pressure transducer. Ultrasound evaluation, including Doppler imaging of renal, portal, and mesenteric blood flow can be helpful in the assessment of end-organ perfusion, as well as estimating the intra-abdominal venous pressure by assessing the caliber of the inferior vena cava. CT scan can also reveal poor perfusion of these organs and a flattened inferior vena cava, as well as increased abdominal girth, especially in the anterior to posterior dimension.

If the diagnosis of ACS is suspected, efforts to augment perfusion must be initiated. Avoid the reverse Trendelenburg or prone positions because these can increase IAP. Effective decompression of the gastrointestinal tract is important and can be optimized by effective nasogastric tube drainage, administration of prokinetic medications, and colonic decompression by either enemas or colonoscopy. Supporting renal function is also important and includes liberal use of diuretics along with volume resuscitation. If these maneuvers have not improved the organ function, temporary decompression by insertion of an abdominal drain to decrease the amount of fluid in the abdomen may be necessary. If this does not adequately decompress the IAH, laparotomy is necessary with placement of a sterile patch or silo that may provide sufficient compliance to reverse the ACS.

The morbidity of ACS is significant, with mortality rates of >50% reported, especially if treatment is delayed until multisystem organ failure develops. After decompression, and after resolution of any end-organ dysfunction occurs, and after the underlying causes of the IAH have abated, delayed closure of the abdomen can be considered. Sometimes that closure will require abdominal wall reconstruction techniques such as skin flap closure without fascial repair or skin grafts. Primary or delayed primary fascial repair may be feasible, sometimes requiring separation and release of the muscle groups, or insertion of prosthetic patches such as synthetic mesh, Gore-tex, or biologic sheet materials made from human dermal grafts or porcine intestinal submucosa.

Surgical Intervention

The decision to perform a laparotomy or laparoscopy in a pediatric ICU patient can be very challenging. There are indeed times when a patient can be “too sick” to go to the operating room and other times when the patient is so sick that only an immediate operation will provide a chance for successful treatment.

With the possible exception of patients with continued intra-abdominal hemorrhage or abdominal compartment syndrome, delaying operative treatment with time spent on preoperative resuscitation is usually valuable. Induction of general anesthesia in a hypovolemic, or acidotic patient with cardiogenic or septic shock can be dangerous. An understanding of the differential diagnosis can be most helpful in planning the appropriate antibiotic coverage and the timing of the surgical treatment. Most of the conditions that require laparotomy in ICU patients have an infectious component and thus empiric broad spectrum antibiotics should be administered early in the resuscitation. Depending on the disease, resuscitation and antibiotics alone may obviate the need for emergent laparotomy. Effective communication between the surgical team and ICU team is therefore essential. To optimize the timing of the operation, the surgical team should be ready to go immediately, once the preoperative resuscitation is sufficient. In situations where physical exam or radiographs do not provide localization, bedside imaging can help localize the disease.

References are available online at http://www.expertconsult.com.

References

1. Cheong Y.C., Laird S.M., Li T.C., et al. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:556-566.

2. Holmdahl L., Ivarsson M.L. The role of cytokines, coagulation, and fibrinolysis in peritoneal tissue repair. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:1012-1019.

3. Matheson P.J., Wilson M.A., Garrison R.N. Regulation of intestinal blood flow. J Surg Res. 2000;93:182-196.

4. Zakaria E.R., Li N., Garrison R.N. Mechanisms of direct peritoneal resuscitation-mediated splanchnic hyperperfusion following hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 2007;27:436-442.

5. Mainous M.R., Ertel W., Chaudry I.H., Deitch E.A. The gut: a cytokine-generating organ in systemic inflammation. Shock. 1995;4:193-199.

6. Jakob S.M. The effects of mechanical ventilation on hepato-splanchnic perfusion. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010. Epub ahead of print

7. Putensen C., Wrigge H., Hering R. The effects of mechanical ventilation on the gut and abdomen. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:160-165.

8. Evennett N.J., Petrov M.S., Mittal A., Windsor J.A. Systematic review and pooled estimates for the diagnostic accuracy of serological markers for intestinal ischemia. World J Surg. 2009;33:1374-1383.

9. Weinberger E., Winters W.D., Liddell R., et al. Sonographic diagnosis of intestinal malrotation in infants: importance of the relative positions of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. AJR. 1992;159:825-828.

10. Pracros J.P., Sann L., Genin G., et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of midgut volvulus: the ‘whirlpool’ sign. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;22:18-20.

11. Lampl B., Levin T.L., Berdon W.E., Cowles R.A. Malrotation and midgut volvulus: a historical review and current controversies in diagnosis and management. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:359-366.

12. Rice H.E., Frush D.P., Farmer D., Waldhausen J.H. Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:603-607.

13. Patzer L. Nephrotoxicity as a cause of acute kidney injury in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23:2159-2173.

14. Schaefer J.F., Kirschner H.J., Lichy M., et al. Highly resolved free-breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnostic workup of pancreaticobiliary diseases in infants and young children—initial experiences. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1645-1651.

15. Nelson D.S., Batemen B., Bolte R.G. Appendiceal perforation in children diagnosed in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16:233-237.

16. Shah S.K., Tieu K.K., Tsao K. Intestinal complications of magnet ingestion in children from the pediatric surgery perspective. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009;19:334-337.

17. Barnes P.M., Norton C.M., Dunstan F.D., et al. Abdominal injury due to child abuse. Lancet. 2005;366:187-188.

18. McCarville M.B., Adelman C.S., Li C., et al. Typhlitis in childhood cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:380-387.

19. Singh V. Endoscopic management of traumatic hemobilia. J Trauma. 2007;62:1045-1047.

20. Malbrain M., Cheatham M., Kirkpatrick A., et al. Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1722-1732.

21. Carlotti A.P.C.P., Carvalho W.B. Abdominal compartment syndrome: a review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10:115-120.

22. Cheatham M., Malbrain M., Kirkpatrick A., et al. Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. II. Recommendations. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:951-962.