Procedure 21 VEPTR Opening Wedge Thoracostomy for Congenital Spinal Deformities
Indications
The titanium rib, or VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib), is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is available for use under the Humanitarian Device Exemption regulations. One approved use is for constrictive chest wall disorders, including fused ribs and scoliosis.
Progressive thoracic congenital scoliosis in patients age 6 months to skeletal maturity
Three or more fused ribs at the apex of the concave hemithorax
Greater than 10% reduction in space available for lung (Campbell et al, 2004)
Presence of progressive thoracic insufficiency syndrome (Campbell et al, 2004)
Examination/Imaging
Patients are evaluated for curve flexibility, head decompensation, truncal decompensation, and trunk rotation.
Resting respiratory rate is measured and compared with normative values. An elevated rate suggests the child has occult respiratory insufficiency. The lips are examined for cyanosis. The fingers are examined for clubbing, a sign of chronic respiratory insufficiency, and the percentile normal weight for age is determined. When the work of breathing is excessive, children are often underweight.
Thoracic function resulting from chest wall expansion is assessed by the thumb excursion test (Campbell et al, 2004).
The examiner’s hands are lightly placed on each side of the patient, around the lateral base of the thorax, with the thumbs in back pointing upward medially, equidistant from the spine (Figure 21-1). The patient breathes spontaneously, and rib cage motion carries the thumbs outward away from the spine. Greater than 1 cm of thumb motion away from the spine is normal and is graded as a +3 thumb excursion test; 0.5 to 1 cm is a +2 thumb excursion test; less than 0.5 cm motion is +1; and no thumb excursion with respiration is graded +0.
Causes of abnormal thumb excursion test include extensive fused ribs or the distortion of rib hump. Absent chest wall motion is a sign of thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS), because the rib cage cannot aid the diaphragm in expanding the lung during normal respiration.
Radiographs should include anteroposterior (AP) and lateral films of the entire spine, including the entire rib cage and the pelvis. These are assessed for Cobb angle, space available for the lungs, and head and truncal decompensation (Figure 21-2). Space available for the lungs is determined by the ratio of the height of the concave lung from the middle of the most proximal rib to the top of the hemidiaphragm compared with the height of the convex lung measured in the same fashion. Head decompensation is measured from the center sacral line to the middle of C7, and truncal decompensation is measured from the midthorax at T6 to the center sacral line.
Supine lateral bending radiographs are used to determine curve flexibility and apex of rib cage constriction on the concave side of the curve (Figure 21-3, arrow). In cases of thoracic kyphosis, a cross-table lateral radiograph of the spine with a bolster at the apex of the curve is included to assess for flexibility.
Cervical spine films, with flexion/extension laterals, are performed to assess for cervical spine abnormalities and instability.
Computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest and spine are performed, unenhanced, at 0.5-cm intervals from T1 to the sacrum, to assess for three-dimensional spine and rib cage abnormality. Thoracic rotation from rotation of the spine into the convex hemithorax with loss of lung volume is the angle between the sagittal plane of the spine and the sternum (Figure 21-4). To minimize radiation exposure, the scan should be performed at pediatric settings, with appropriate milliamperage and pitch angle.
Fluoroscopy of the diaphragm or ultrasonography is performed to document normal function. Dynamic lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), if available, also can be used to assess diaphragm function.
MRI of the entire spinal cord is performed to assess for spinal cord abnormalities.
FIGURE 21-2 CSL, Centrosacral line; HD, head decompensation; SAL, space available for lung; TD, trunk decompensation.
Examination Pitfalls
• Progressive thoracic insufficiency syndrome, the prime FDA indication for VEPTR treatment, is difficult to define by standard radiographic assessment, because it is a dynamic condition. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome is the inability of the thorax to support normal respiration or lung growth (Campbell et al, 2004), and the presence of either component enables the diagnosis of TIS. The disabled thorax, such as seen in a child with fused ribs, cannot expand the lung with chest wall motion on the involved side; so, normal biomechanical respiration is not possible. The same thorax, if unable to grow properly because of the rib cage constriction due to rib fusion, also has the second component of TIS.
• TIS does not mean a child requires oxygen support. Pediatric patients needing oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, or ventilator support have respiratory insufficiency, which means the respiratory mechanism is unable to provide physiologic oxygenation for the needs of the patient. Respiratory insufficiency may be due to intrinsic disease of the lungs and/or severe thoracic disability from volume depletion deformity (Campbell et al, 2003a) or abnormal thoracic function. Occult respiratory insufficiency syndrome in children with early TIS may be masked by an increase in respiratory rate, or adaptive behavior through reduction in activity levels for age. End-stage TIS almost always has associated respiratory insufficiency syndrome.
Controversies
• Patients with TIS and congenital scoliosis who are almost at the age of skeletal maturity: If thoracic height is near normal and thoracic volume and function adequate, then the growth-sparing aspect of VEPTR treatment on the spine deformity will have marginal impact on lung growth; so, definitive spine fusion is preferable.
• Isolated hemivertebra of thoracolumbar congenital scoliosis with limited rib fusion: If the thoracic spine is near normal height for age and treatment with hemivertebrectomy or hemiarthrodesis/hemiepiphyseodesis would involve three segments or less, then these techniques are preferable to VEPTR treatment.
• Mobile chest wall on the concave side of the curve: Although invariably the chest wall on the concave side of the curve is stiff from rib fusion, and the potential for VEPTR treatment to stiffen the concave chest wall is thus a moot point, then if the thumb excursion test does show mobility with normal outward motion of the concave chest wall during respiration, a growth-sparing treatment other than VEPTR should be considered.
Treatment Options
• Limited (one or two spinal segment[s]) hemivertebrectomy or convex hemiarthrodesis/hemiepiphyseodesis for isolated hemivertebra when the thoracic spine is of relatively normal length and the chest wall is mobile
• Growing rod instrumentation of the spine when the congenital spine deformity is more extensive and the chest wall is mobile on the concave side of the curve
• Posterior spine fusion for patients approaching skeletal maturity, when expansion of the chest will have no effect on growth of the underlying lungs
Surgical Anatomy
Proximally, the common insertion of the middle and the posterior scalene muscle on the first and second ribs is identified. The brachial plexus and the artery lie immediately anterior to this (Figure 21-5). It is an important landmark, because the neurovascular bundle is just anterior. The safe zone for VEPTR proximal rib cradle attachment is posterior to the scalene muscles, extending from the second through the fourth ribs. Attachment anterior to the scalene muscles or posterior on the first rib endangers the neurovascular bundle.
Absent ribs in the exposure are identified by palpating the flail area. These are commonly associated with dysraphism of the spine, and care should be taken to avoid violating the spinal canal in the dissection. The preoperative CT scan commonly identifies bony defects in the canal. Figure 21-6 shows the CT scan of an infant with a spinal dysraphism with the meningocele extending up to the medial border of the scapula that was poorly appreciated on radiographs. In surgery, the scapula was gently retracted upward and the rhomboid muscles dissected just adjacent to the edge of the scapula so that the dura was not injured.
Positioning
The patient is placed in a modified lateral decubitus position with the torso tilted slightly forward (15 degrees) (Figure 21-7).
The upper extremities are draped outside the exposure. They are positioned with the shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion, with the elbows also flexed. An axillary roll is placed, along with another soft bolster under the apex of the convex hemithorax. The extremities are immobilized by placing hand towels on the midcalf and the hips with a 2-inch cloth tape used to strap across the patient.
Central venous line, arterial pressure monitoring line, urinary catheter, and spinal cord monitoring leads are placed.
Positioning Pearls
• An axillary roll is used as well as a pad under the pelvis and the lower extremities. A soft bolster pad is placed under the apex of the thoracic deformity to help provide correction.
• A pulse oximeter is placed on the upward hand to monitor vascularity of the upper extremity. Both upper and lower extremities are monitored for spinal cord function with somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial motor evoked potentials.
Portals/Exposures
To avoid skin slough, a long curvilinear incision is made, beginning proximally between the posterior spinous process of the spine at T1 and the medial edge of the scapula, extending distally down to the tenth rib, then anteriorly in a gentle curve along the rib to the posterior axillary line (Figure 21-8).
The trapezius, latissimus dorsi, and rhomboid muscles are divided by cautery in line with the skin incision.
The scapula is gently retracted laterally.
An interval is developed by blunt dissection between the chest wall and the overlying scapula, anteriorly to the costochondral junction, and superiorly up to the first rib. The middle and posterior scalene muscle insertion on the first and second rib is identified in order to protect the neurovascular bundle just anterior to the muscle.
The separate incision for the hybrid laminar spinal hook is to be made 1 cm lateral to midline of the proximal lumbar spine posterior spinal processes.
The paraspinal muscles are reflected by cautery, laterally to medially, up to the tips of the transverse spinous processes, leaving a 1-mm thick layer of soft tissue overlying the ribs to avoid rib devascularization (Figure 21-9). The spine is not uncovered in order to avoid inadvertent fusion.
Positioning Pearls
• In congenital deformity of the thorax and spine, commonly the anatomy is significantly distorted with rib fusion and anomalous muscle insertion. The scalene muscles, however, are consistently present and, although anomalous in appearance, can often be palpated readily, thus providing a landmark for identification of the neurovascular bundle anteriorly.
• For purposes of identifying correct rib levels for insertion of devices, the first rib can usually be palpated posteriorly between the common insertion of the scalene muscles and the tips of the transverse processes, and levels then are counted distally through palpation.
Positioning Pitfalls
• Care should be taken to avoid damaging the spinal cord in areas of dysraphic spine adjacent to rib absence.
• In the Sprengel deformity, associated with fused ribs and scoliosis, there is commonly a fibrous or bony connection between the spine and the upwardly displaced hypoplastic scapula, but if there is dysraphism, the medial edge of the scapula may actually be inside the spinal canal, adjacent to the spinal cord. In this anatomic variant, a regular thoracotomy approach may injure the spinal cord when the rhomboid muscles are released medially; so, in these cases, the scapula is gently retracted upward out of the canal by a small rake and the medial muscles carefully stripped off the scapula above the canal, with care taken not to violate the dura to avoid spinal cord injury (Figure 21-10). A preoperative CT scan can define this variant.
Instrumentation
• It is helpful to retract the scapula with an Israel retractor placed under the scapula, with two small towel clips clamped under the muscle tissue in the manner of M.D. Smith. The clips are then attached by Ray-Tec sponges around the larger retractor. The Israel retractor is then attached by a Ray-Tec sponge to a large towel clip attached to an ether screen bar at the head of the operating table (Figure 21-11). This provides excellent self-retraction.
Procedure
Step 1: Insertion of Superior Rib Cradle for the Hybrid VEPTR
After exposure is completed, the level of the insertion of the superior rib cradle is located. This is based on radiographic evidence and confirmed by locating the first rib by palpation and counting ribs downward. The superior cradle should be placed at the proximal end of the rib cage constriction, which is commonly proximal to the apex of the congenital spinal curve. The site is marked by cautery, just lateral to the tips of the transverse processes.
A 1-cm portal for insertion of the superior cradle is made by cautery at the correct level in the midportion of the intercostal muscle or the fibrous adhesion between ribs, just adjacent to the tip of the transverse processes.
Another portal, 5 mm wide, is placed superiorly for the upper portion of the superior cradle, called the cradle cap. If a standard cradle cap is used, then approximately 1 cm of distance should separate the inferior and superior portals for the rib cradle. If an extended cradle is used to surround more bone or even two ribs, then a 1.5-cm distance is needed.
A curved Freer elevator is then inserted through an intercostal incision into the inferior portal, pointed proximally, and is used to strip away the combined pleura/periosteum from the anterior surface of the rib, carefully creating a soft tissue tunnel up to the superior portal without damaging the neurovascular bundle. Next, a second Freer elevator is inserted into the superior portal and touched to the tip of the inferior Freer elevator in order to verify that a continuous soft tissue tunnel has been developed (Figure 21-12).
The trial for the device is then inserted into the inferior and the superior portals to enlarge the soft tissue tunnel.