13. Utility of Active Fixation Lead in Unstable Left Ventricular Lead Positions in the Coronary Sinus for Left Ventricular Stimulation

Published on 26/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 26/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1136 times

History

The patient had recurrent hospital admissions for heart failure despite optimal tolerable medical therapy. He had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25% and mechanical dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler echocardiogram. He also had documented nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on Holter monitoring.

Current Medications

The patient was taking warfarin 0.125 mcg/daily, furosemide 40 mg twice daily, carvedilol 12.5 mg twice daily, aldactone 25 mg daily, digoxin 0.125 mg daily, simvastatin 20 mg daily, and valsartan 80 mg daily.

Current Symptoms

Recurrent admissions for heart failure. Significantly breathless at mild exertion (New York Heart Association class III).

Physical Examination

Laboratory Data

Focused Clinical Questions and Discussion Points

Question

How frequently is a left ventricular lead with an active fixation mechanism required to pace the left ventricle?

Discussion

A left ventricular lead with some form of active fixation mechanism is required to overcome anatomic peculiarity, unstable lead position, and a circumscribed area of optimal pacing threshold without phrenic nerve stimulation in 12% of patients.3
Buy Membership for Cardiovascular Category to continue reading. Learn more here