Wound management

Published on 23/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1178 times

4.1 Wound management

Introduction

Open wounds account for up to one third of paediatric emergency presentations; two thirds of open wounds occur in boys, and 40% involve a fall. The scalp and face account for more than 50% of all open wounds, and about 30% occur on the hands.14 The goals of management of these wounds are to avoid infection, minimise discomfort, facilitate healing and minimise scar formation. Meticulous attention to wound care and repair should ensure the best possible outcome and functional result. In children this often requires sedation in addition to adequate local anaesthesia and analgesia. Universal precautions should always be followed when assessing or managing any wound. Gloves (preferably sterile), drapes and eye protection are mandatory.

Pathophysiology of wound healing

The stages of wound healing are coagulation, inflammation, proliferation and maturation. Wound healing is a sequential process that begins immediately after tissue injury. Coagulation is initiated by platelet aggregation then by fibrin clot formation. This supplies haemostasis and allows accumulation of neutrophils and monocytes, which herald the inflammatory phase. The inflammatory phase provides phagocytosis of bacteria, other foreign matter, and dead tissue in the wound. The macrophages release factors that stimulate proliferation of local fibroblasts in the dermis. These provide a collagen network and stimulate new vessel growth. This phase is characterised by pink granulation tissue and wound contraction. A warm moist environment that is supplied either by dressings or scab formation aids this process. Collagen synthesis reaches its peak towards the end of the first week of healing. Remodelling continues to occur for up to 12 months; thus the scar will usually fade and contract over the first 2 to 3 months and the final appearance may not be obvious for up to 6 months post injury.

A number of factors affect the healing of a wound. Adequate nutrition (including vitamins C and A, which are required for collagen formation) is essential. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs interfere with cellular proliferation and immunity, and anticoagulants inhibit clot formation and initial wound stabilisation. Infection interferes with collagen synthesis and will delay wound healing and cause an increase in scar tissue formation.

Tensile forces of the surrounding skin affect the healing and scar formation of a wound. The most cosmetically pleasing outcome occurs when the long axis of the wound is in the direction of maximum skin tension – along Langer’s Lines of skin tension. Wounds that have long axis perpendicular to the lines of skin tension will heal with greater scarring, but there is significant inter-child variability. Dynamic skin tension caused by joint movement also impairs wound healing and causes increased scar formation, and immobilisation of joints while the laceration heals will minimise this effect.

Evaluation of the patient with a laceration

The care of the patient as a whole should be the first management priority. The airway, breathing and circulation should be assessed and treated as appropriate and a thorough secondary survey undertaken in most patients to exclude or allow management of serious injuries as well as detecting other minor injuries.

History

The mechanism of trauma (cut, crush, fall, bite, burn) and the time of injury are important as they may alter the management of the wound. Crush and bite injuries characteristically cause significantly more surrounding tissue damage and thus are more likely to have delayed healing or infection. When possible, determine the cleanliness of the inflicting object, the amount of blood loss, the presence of a foreign-body sensation, and the motor function and sensation distal to the affected area. The location of the wound should be noted and the possibility of injury to other structures explored.

The health status of the patient should be explored, especially with regard to chronic illnesses that may impact on wound healing – such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, malnutrition, chronic renal impairment, cyanotic congenital heart disease, chronic respiratory illness, tumours, and bleeding disorders.3 Immunisation history should be obtained and further tetanus vaccination guided by the recommendations of the National Health and Medical Research Council (Table 4.1.1).7 Current medications are important for both drug interactions with antibiotics that may be prescribed and for medications that may interfere with wound healing – such as immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids. A history of allergies must be determined prior to use of cleansing agents, dressings and tapes and prescription of medication. A history of latex allergy should be specifically sought. In wounds that require management under general anaesthesia or sedation a history of when the child last ate or drank is important. Non-accidental injury should be considered, especially when the history and injury are inconsistent.

image

Examination

Once assessment and management of more serious injuries has occurred, the patient should be assessed for the current severity of any chronic illness, and appropriate management initiated.

The co-operation able to be gained and comprehension level of the child influence wound examination and the information gained. Distraction techniques, adequate topical anaesthesia and appropriate use of sedation can all aid in wound assessment. A calm, unhurried, friendly approach, involving the parents, will maximise the chances of co-operation. Examination of the wound should be done with optimal lighting and with bleeding minimised. Examination of function, sensation and circulation distal to the wound is best performed prior to exploration of the wound and prior to regional anaesthesia.810

Functional assessment requires the movement of all joints distal to the wound. In an older child each joint is examined individually on command and the strength documented. In the child less than 5 years old, observation of posture, symmetry and general movement is required. In wounds to the flexor tendons of the hand, close attention should be paid to the resting position of the fingers (partial flexion). The finding of extension of one finger at rest and the failure of the finger to flex at play or after application of a noxious stimulus confirms the tendon injury.

Injury to nerves is classically assessed with two-point discrimination and this should be possible in older children. Using a paperclip bent so that its ends are separated 4–8 mm is useful in this process. In upper limb injuries formal assessment of the median, ulna and radial nerves is required. In children less than 5 years old this approach needs to be modified. A noxious stimulus applied to the fingers will illicit sensation but risks losing patient confidence. Another method of determining intact innervation is to look for sweating of the fingers. Since autonomic response includes sweating, denervated fingers do not sweat. An ophthalmoscope can be used to examine for sweat beads or the cleaned body of a pen can be run over the fingers, with less resistance in the denervated, thus dry, segment. Arterial circulation is assessed by palpation of peripheral pulses, capillary return distal to the injury, and skin colour and temperature.

Assessment of the wound should include site, size, depth, nature of the edges, cleanliness, and presence of foreign bodies. The wound should be explored to determine the depth and involvement of any underlying tissues including vessels, nerves, tendons, ligaments, muscles, joints, bones and specialised tissues (especially ducts and glands). Bones adjacent to the wound should be palpated for deformity or crepitus and the wound searched for foreign bodies (including the sound of glass on the metal forceps). This assessment and exploration should take place after appropriate anaesthesia of the wound and any required sedation.

Treatment of wounds

Wound anaesthesia

Analgesia and sedation are discussed in more detail in Section 20. Anaesthesia is required to adequately examine and then treat most wounds. Often, in children, analgesia and sedation will also be necessary, depending on the location of the wound, the involvement of underlying structures, and the age and anxiety of the child.

The options for anaesthesia include topical anaesthesia, local infiltration, regional anaesthesia, dissociative anaesthesia, or general anaesthesia.

Topical anaesthetics include ALA (adrenaline, lidocaine and amethocaine (tetracaine)) – commonly known as LET (lidocaine, epinephrine and tetracaine) in North America, or EMLA cream (eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics) – manufactured by AstraZeneca. ALA is highly effective on facial and head wounds but less so on limb wounds. It has replaced TAC (tetracaine, adrenaline and cocaine) in most institutions. Due to the vasoconstricting properties of adrenaline (epinephrine) these anaesthetics should not be used in areas of end arteries (finger tips, nose, lips, ears, genitalia). EMLA has been shown to be safe and effective when applied to limb wounds. Topical anaesthetics should be applied in the wound either as a liquid dripped onto a pledget of cotton wool placed into the wound or as a methylcellulose gel. The wound is then covered with an occlusive impermeable dressing and adequate anaesthesia is usually obtained within 30 minutes.1217

Local infiltration is the classical method of anaesthetising a wound. The anaesthetic is injected into the wound margins. Pain of injection can be minimised by using warmed anaesthetic, buffering the drug with sodium bicarbonate (mix 10 mL of 1% lidocaine with 1 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate), infiltrating slowly, using the lowest concentration possible, and using needles sized 25 gauge or smaller. The most commonly used local anaesthetic is lidocaine 1 or 2% with or without adrenaline (epinephrine) 1:100 000. The onset of action is rapid, with duration of action of 30 minutes to 1 hour. Addition of adrenaline (epinephrine) is useful to prolong the duration of action and help minimise bleeding; however, adrenaline (epinephrine) should be avoided in regions of end arteries (fingers, nose, lips, ears, genitalia), and its use may increase the risk of infection. The safe dose of plain lidocaine is 3 mg kg–1 or 6 mg kg–1 for lidocaine mixed with adrenaline (epinephrine).3

Regional anaesthesia is useful for facial, hand and foot lacerations, where nerves are readily accessible near bony landmarks. A regional nerve block involves anaesthetising the nerve or nerves that supply a specific anatomic region. Regional anaesthesia is especially useful for large lacerations and lacerations where local infiltration causes distortion of tissue anatomy. Regional anaesthesia is especially useful for anaesthetising digits. Lidocaine or bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5%, which has duration of action of 3 to 6 hours, are the most commonly used agents. The safe dose of bupivacaine is 2 mg kg–1.

Sedation is often required when treating lacerations in children. Options for sedation include benzodiazepines – such as midazolam or diazepam, fentanyl, nitrous oxide, ketamine, or propofol. Sedation should only be undertaken by personnel experienced in its use and able to manage the complications of airway compromise, oxygen desaturation and respiratory depression. Adequate equipment to deal with these complications should also be available. Some form of physical restraint may also be necessary to prevent excessive movement during repair; however, the aim must be to provide adequate analgesia and anxiolysis.13,18

Wound preparation and cleansing

Hair near the wound should only be removed if it interferes with the meticulous closure of the wound. If hair removal is desired the hair should be clipped, not shaved, as shaving disrupts hair follicles and increases the incidence of wound infection.19 Eyebrow hair should not be removed because this may lead to abnormal or delayed regrowth.

The surrounding skin and wound edges should be thoroughly cleaned. This should be undertaken in a manner and with a substance that provides adequate antisepsis without tissue damage or impairing wound defence mechanisms. A solution such as aqueous povidone-iodine or aqueous chlorhexidene applied with gauze or cotton wool should be used. Care should be taken to minimise the amount of cleanser to penetrate the wound to minimise damage to wound defences increasing the risk of infection.

Surgical debridement of crushed or non-viable tissue is vital to prevent wound infection or delayed wound healing. However, as little tissue should be debrided as possible. Manual removal with forceps of large particles of foreign material should also be meticulously undertaken. When a heavily contaminated wound contains specialised tissues such as tendons or nerves, consultation is recommended.

Once the wound is adequately anaesthetised it should be thoroughly cleaned. Irrigation is the method of choice for removing dirt and bacteria from wounds. In hospital, saline (0.9%) is the irrigation solution of choice, as it causes no tissue damage, but tap water can be used.20 The ability of irrigation to decontaminate a wound is directly related to pressure of the irrigating stream, the size of the particles to be removed, and the volume of irrigant. At least 100–200 mL per 2 cm of laceration are required. The fluid should be injected from a 30–60 mL syringe via an 18 to 20 gauge cannula. Higher pressures should be avoided as they may cause tissue damage and increase the incidence of wound infection.21,22 The volume and pressure of irrigation should be modified as necessary according to the location and cause of the wound. High-pressure irrigation does not enhance the dissemination of bacteria into soft tissue wounds, but excessive use can cause local tissue oedema enhancing risk of infection. Use of a device to minimise splashing of the irrigant is desirable and wearing of gloves, goggles and gown mandatory.21,22

Antibiotic prophylaxis

The use of prophylactic antibiotics in wound care is controversial. Decontamination with appropriate irrigation techniques is more beneficial than the use of prophylactic antibiotics.2,9,23,24 When indicated (Table 4.1.2), antibiotics should be given as soon as possible. The initial dose should be given intravenously and be relatively large to provide rapid reliable high tissue concentrations. The first dose should be given before wound closure to ensure an effective concentration of antibiotic in the wound tissue fluid at the time of wound closure. When choosing an antibiotic the likely causative organisms should be borne in mind: the organisms contaminating the wound and the commensal organisms found in that region of the body. In general, bites and wounds in regions with high bacterial counts (hands, feet, groin) should be treated with antibiotics to cover Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus and Streptococcus sp. The likelihood of anaerobic bacteria needs to be considered. Specific circumstances also need to be borne in mind. Patients at risk of endocarditis should have all wounds treated with antibiotics to cover S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Ampicillin/amoxicillin is the currently recommended drug in Australia. However, in communities where the incidence of penicillin resistance is high a cephalosporin and an aminoglycoside are recommended.

Table 4.1.2 Indications for antibiotic prophylaxis in wounds

Wound characteristics High risk anatomic site (hands, forefoot, groin, axilla) Devitalised tissue Extensive surrounding soft tissue injury Stellate lacerations Contaminated with body fluids or organic matter or dirt Large lacerations (> 5 cm) Closure delayed (> 12 hours) High risk for endocarditis Prosthetic heart valves Patent ductus arteriosis Structural heart disease
Tetralogy of Fallot
Ventricular septal defects
Coarctation of the aorta
Damaged heart valves Immunocompromised children Prior history of endocarditis Intravenous drug use

Wounds associated with fractures, tendon or muscle involvement should be considered for prophylaxis, as should large wounds, wounds with significant devitalised tissue such as crush injuries and stellate lacerations. Wounds contaminated with faeces should be treated with coverage of coliforms and anaerobic bacteria. Wounds in children with a compromised immune system should all be considered for treatment. Wounds with closure delayed more than 12 hours should also be considered high risk for infection. Treatment should be for 3 to 5 days with a penicillinase-resistant antibiotic such as a first generation cephalosporin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, with consideration to addition of metronidazole.25

Wound closure

The aim of wound closure is to reduce discomfort, aid healing and produce the best cosmetic result possible.26 The technique chosen for wound closure depends on the type of wound. Most wounds in children can be managed with primary closure, as the risk of infection is relatively low. Infected, heavily contaminated wounds and wounds resulting from high-energy projectiles are best managed by delayed primary closure, with initial cleansing and packing then closure 3 to 5 days later, once the risk of infection has decreased. Wounds with delayed presentation (>24 hours), or those contaminated with saliva or faeces should also be considered for delayed closure. Some wounds, such as puncture wounds or contaminated wounds in areas of poor perfusion should not be closed but allowed to heal by secondary intention. Once it is decided to close the wound, a technique that allows apposition of the wound edges that is secure and accurate and holds the wound edges in apposition until the strength of the wound is sufficient should be chosen. With improved technology the options for wound closure are growing. Those presently available include sutures, staples, tissue adhesives and tapes.

Absorbable sutures are made from either collagen or synthetic polymers. Gut sutures are manufactured from the submucosa of ovine or bovine intestines. The collagen is then treated to strengthen the material and increase resistance to tissue degradation (plain gut). Coating with chromium trioxide provides more resistance to absorption (chromic gut). These suture materials have a somewhat unpredictable absorption. Synthetic absorbable sutures have improved strength and delayed and more reliable absorption characteristics. Absorbable sutures are used for closing deep layers of a laceration and can be used for skin closure – especially where removing sutures in a young child may be difficult, or where procedural sedation is required to place sutures.

Non-absorbable sutures are made from either natural (silk, cotton, linen) or synthetic (nylon, Dacron®) fibres. They can also be classified according to their physical characteristics. Monofilament sutures are made from a single filament (nylon, Prolene®), and sutures containing multiple fibres are called multifilament (silk, cotton, nylon). Of these sutures, only nylon is available in both types of filament. Non-absorbable sutures are used to close fascial layers (where healing is slow) and for skin closure.27,28

Sutures come in varying sizes. The size of the suture to be used depends on the wound location and the tensile strength of the tissue to be sutured. Heavy sutures such as 4–0 should be used in the limbs and trunk, and should also be used on mucous membranes and subcutaneous tissue. Heaviest sutures such as 3–0 should be used on thick skin (such as the sole of the foot) or over large joints. Small sutures such as 6–0 should be used on tissues with light tensions, such as facial skin and subcutaneous tissue.27,28

Needles

Needles come in varying sizes and shapes also. Needles are describes by the arc of curvature the needle possesses, and the shape of the needle itself. The most commonly used for skin closure is the 3/8 circle (135°) needle or the ½ circle (180°) needle (see Fig. 4.1.1). For closure of fascial layers ½ circumference needles are usually used. Needles that have two circumferences of curvature (compound needles) are able to be passed through the tissue with less rotation of the forearm. Needles come with different shapes as well as curvatures (see Fig. 4.1.1). A reverse cutting needle is the most common type used for skin closure. The needle cuts an inverted triangle and the suture sits on the base of the triangle, decreasing the likelihood of cutting out. A conventional cutting needle cuts a triangle into the skin and the suture sits in the apex of the triangle. For fascia a taper point needle is used. The cross-section of these needles is a circle that is tapered to a point. It does not cut but pushes the tissues aside, causing less tissue damage and reducing the chance of the stitch cutting out. For deep tissues that are stronger (such as tendon) a tapercut, or combination needle is used – it has a tapered body, but the point is a reverse cutting edge.28

image

Fig. 4.1.1 Surgical needle characteristics and types.

(From an original drawing by Elaine Wheildon.)

Needles are grasped with a needle holder. The swage of the needle – the region where the needle is hollowed out to join with the suture – is the weakest point, and grasping the needle in this region should be avoided. The needle should be grasped in the body one half or two thirds of the distance from the tip of the needle.

Suturing techniques

For closure of a wound with sutures a number of instruments are needed to maintain a sterile field and to allow manipulation of the tissues and needle (Table 4.1.4). Finer instruments should be available for facial laceration repair.

Table 4.1.4 Example of instruments required for a simple suture tray

1 × Needle holder (Halsey or Hegar) 1 × Toothed dissecting forceps 1 × Curved artery/mosquito forceps 1 × Straight artery/mosquito forceps 1 × Suture scissors

Sutures should be placed to allow apposition of all injured layers of the skin. Proper suture placement should result in slight eversion of the wound edges, avoiding a depression of the scar when contraction takes place during wound healing. To ensure eversion of skin edges the skin suture must be placed so that an equal amount of tissue is included on each side of the wound, and so that the needle bite includes a broad base (Figs 4.1.2 and 4.1.3). This is accomplished by lifting the wound edge as the needle is passed through the skin on each side, maximising the deep tissues included in the suture.28,29

Most wounds sutured in the ED are closed with interrupted skin sutures. Synthetic non-absorbable sutures are most commonly used. However, rapidly absorbable sutures can be used to close the skin in children, avoiding the discomfort of suture removal. To place a simple interrupted suture the needle is held so the tip enters the skin at a right angle, and the hand rotated to ensure the needle remains at right angles to the skin throughout its passage, which aids in maximising the deep tissues captured in the bite. The stitch should be secured with an instrument tie and the knots secured to one side of the wound to minimise inflammation to the healing tissue. The initial throw should include two wraps of the suture material around the needle holder; subsequent throws should be wrapped once. The knot should be tied just tight enough to oppose the skin edges. Tying the knot too tightly will cause a reduction in the blood supply to the wound edges and increase the risk of infection and poor cosmetic outcome. Synthetic sutures with poor handling should have four or five throws per knot.2830

The more sutures placed per centimetre, the finer the control over the wound edge. For facial lacerations, the skin sutures should be placed approximately 3 mm apart and enter the skin about 3 mm from the wound edge. For other areas of the body, sutures should be placed 4 to 5 mm apart and should pierce the skin about 5 mm from the wound edge. The number of sutures used to close a wound should be the minimal number that allows a desired cosmetic outcome. In general, the better the blood supply, the closer together sutures can be placed.

There are generally two methods for closing a laceration, either suturing from one end to the other, or placing sutures that serially bisect the wound. A small linear wound is easily sutured from end to end, and long wounds without good landmarks on either side are most easily closed by placing the first stitch in the middle and then serially subdividing the wound. In wounds with definite landmarks, such as palmar skin creases or the vermillion border of the lip, the first suture should be placed to align these landmarks.28,30

Deep sutures should be placed where there are multiple layers of tissue involved and the skin sutures would be under tension. They are placed to reapproximate the dermal layers of the skin and remove skin tension, thus improving cosmetic outcome. Placing deep sutures inserts a foreign body into the wound and increases the risk of wound infection, so they should only be placed when necessary and the minimum number necessary used. For this reason, deep sutures should be avoided in the hands and feet. Deep sutures placed close to the skin are sometimes extruded through the wound. To place a deep suture, the needle is placed at the depth of the wound and removed at a more superficial level. The needle is then placed at the same superficial level on the opposite side of the wound and exits deeply so the knot is tied deeply in the wound (see Fig. 4.1.3).28,30

Special suturing techniques

A variety of special suturing techniques are available with the sole purpose of aiding the provision of skin apposition with everted wound edges. The vertical mattress suture is useful in regions with minimal subcutaneous tissue where the edges are difficult to maintain in eversion. The technique is begun the same way as a simple skin suture, but after the suture loop is made, the skin is re-entered 1 to 2 mm from the wound edge and then tied (see Fig. 4.1.4). The horizontal mattress suture reinforces the subcutaneous tissue and relieves skin tension, but does not provide wound edge approximation as well as the vertical mattress suture (Fig. 4.1.5). The modified or half-buried horizontal mattress suture (or corner stitch) is the method of choice for closing a flap. It relieves tissue tension and avoids vascular compromise when approximating the tip of the flap (Fig. 4.1.6).28,30

A continuous suture can be used to close the laceration. It is faster to place than interrupted sutures, removal of sutures is easier and faster, and the tension is spread evenly along the wound. The continuous suture can be percutaneous or subcutaneous and made with absorbable or non-absorbable suture material. The disadvantages are that if one part of the suture breaks, the integrity of the whole wound is lost, and if the wound becomes infected, the whole wound needs to be opened to drain the pus. To place a percutaneous running stitch an interrupted suture is placed at one end of the wound and only the free end of the suture is cut. Suturing is continued along the wound in a coil pattern ensuring that the needle passes perpendicularly across the wound with each pass. The loop is tightened after each pass and the last stitch placed beyond the end of the laceration. The stitch is tied using the last loop as the tail.28,30

Tissue adhesives

Tissue adhesives have now been in use for several decades. The basis of the adhesive is a cyanoacrylate polymer. The cyanoacrylate polymerises in the presence of hydroxyl ions – found in water or blood – allowing them to bind to the skin. Tissue adhesives are for external use only and should not be placed within wounds or used on mucous membranes.

It is in the repair of lacerations to young children that tissue adhesives have become most popular. They are easy and relatively painless to apply and provide a cosmetic result that is as good as suturing, with no risk of causing suture marks. No removal is required, as they slough off in 7 to 10 days. They are, however, not suitable for use in all wounds. If the laceration cannot be approximated and the wound edges brought together with minimal tension, then tissue adhesive is not appropriate. Care should be taken not to apply too much tissue glue and to avoid placement over currently bleeding wounds, as the polymerisation is exothermic and the patient may notice a heat sensation. Also, contact with excess blood causes polymerisation above the skin, limiting the tensile strength of wound-edge closure.

The tissue glue is applied over the surface of the wound once its edges have been approximated by digital pressure. A number of thin layers of glue are applied across the wound and the wound held approximated for about 30 seconds. Care is taken not to allow glue to spill into eyes or orifices, and to avoid fixing forceps or gloves to the patient. The cyanoacrylates also act as their own dressing providing moist wound healing conditions under the glue, and have a degree of intrinsic antimicrobial activity. Careful attention to wound cleansing is still needed to avoid wound infections. In general, they are less expensive than sutures or staples and are strongly preferred by patients and families. A comparison of the various methods of wound closure is found in Table 4.1.5.3234

Table 4.1.5 Characteristics of wound closure techniques

Technique Advantages Disadvantages Suture Greatest tensile strength May require removal   Meticulous closure Painful/requires local anaesthesia ± sedation     Slow application     Costly     Slow to apply     Increased tissue reaction Staples Rapid application Less meticulous closure   Low cost
Low tissue reactivity Painful/requires local anaesthesia ± sedation     Requires removal Tissue adhesives Painless Lower tensile strength   Rapid application Not for use over joints   No removal needed
Low cost Slightly higher incidence of dehiscence   No risk of needle stick   Surgical tapes Least reactive Low tensile strength   Rapid application Difficulty maintaining adhesion   Patient comfort
No risk of needle stick May require use of toxic adjuncts to aid adhesion   Low cost  

Post-wound-closure care

All patients should be provided with written information on care of their wound. Parents and children must understand the importance of ongoing wound care and be provided with instructions about follow up.

Dressing and suture removal

After the wound has been sutured it should be covered with a non-adherent occlusive or semiocclusive dressing to protect the wound from bacterial invasion and provide a moist healing environment and speed wound healing. Ideally, the dressing is left intact until suture removal. The dressing should only be removed if it becomes saturated or there is a risk of infection and inspection is warranted. If the wound is not covered with a waterproof dressing the dressing can be removed every few days for showering. Non-absorbable sutures should be removed at the appropriate time, depending on the location of the injury. Removal of the sutures too early risks dehiscence; leaving sutures too long increases tissue reaction and the risk of cross-hatching and wound infection (Table 4.1.6). In general, sutures are removed earlier in children than in adults. Wounds closed with tissue adhesive should not be covered with an occlusive dressing, as the extra moisture will more rapidly decrease the ability of the glue to maintain wound edge apposition. The wound should be kept dry for 2–3 days, after which the patients may shower but should avoid bathing and swimming. Wounds closed with skin tapes should be kept dry to prevent premature removal.

Table 4.1.6 Timing of suture removal

Wound location Time of removal (days) Face 4 Scalp 5 Upper limbs, trunk 7–10 Lower limbs 8–10 Over joints 10–14

Treatment of selected injuries

Bites

Species Suturing Antibiotics Dog Yes High-risk wound type only Cat Face only All Rodent Yes No Human – hand bites No Yes Human – other bites Yes Large wounds

Cat bites, on the other hand, are typically puncture wounds with less surrounding tissue injury. They have bacteria inoculated deep into the wound, which is difficult to explore, irrigate or debride. The risk of infection is significantly higher than in dog bite – at least twice as likely – because of the puncture-type wound, the most common location of the bite being the hand, and the high incidence (about 80%) of Pasteurella multocida found in cats’ mouths. P. multocida is a facultative, anaerobic Gram-negative rod that often results in rapidly progressive cellulitis. It is sensitive to the penicillins and variably sensitive to macrolides and first-generation cephalosporins. All these drugs have been documented as adequately treating infections of P. multocida, but treatment failures have been documented for erythromycin and first-generation cephalosporins. It is recommended that all cat bites receive prophylactic antibiotics (see Table 4.1.7).36,37

Human bites

Most human bites are probably at no more risk of infection than ordinary lacerations and they are not considered to carry a high risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission. Prophylactic antibiotics have, however, been shown to reduce the risk of infection. Appropriate prophylactic antimicrobial choices for human bite injuries include amoxicillin with clavulanate.36 However, the clenched-fist injury (or fight bite), which commonly causes a ragged laceration over the fourth or fifth metacarpophalangeal joint is at high risk of infection. These latter wounds should all receive prophylactic antibiotics, as should human bites (including self-inflicted bites) that have high-risk properties (see Tables 4.1.7 and 4.1.8).36

References

1 Singer A.J., Thode H.C.Jr, Hollander J.E. National trends in ED lacerations between 1992 and 2002. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(2):183-188.

2 Young S.J., Barnett P.L., Oakley E.A. 10. Bruising, abrasions and lacerations: minor injuries in children I. Med J Aust. 2005;182(11):588-592.

3 Hollander J.E., Singer A.J. Laceration management. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:356-367.

4 Capellan O., Hollander J.E. Management of lacerations in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21:205-231.

5 Hollander J.E., Singer A.J., Valentine S.M., Shofer F.S. Risk factors for infection in patients with traumatic lacerations. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:716-720.

6 Knapp J.F. Updates in wound management for the paediatrician. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1999;46:1201-1213.

7 NHMRC. The Australian Immunisation Handbook, 8th ed. Commonwealth of Australia; 2008.

8 Singer A.J., Hollander J.E., Quinn J. Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1142-1148.

9 Baruch J. Laceration repair. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):556-558.

10 Weinberger L.N., Chen E.H., Mills A.M. Is screening radiography necessary to detect retained foreign bodies in adequately explored superficial glass-caused wounds? Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(5):666-667.

11 Anderson M.A., Newmeyer W.L., Kilgore E.S.J. Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign body in the hand. Am J Surg. 1982;114:63.

12 Zempsky W.T., Karasic R.B. EMLA versus TAC for topical anesthesia of extremity wounds in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30:163-166.

13 Kennedy R.M., Luhmann J.D. Pharmacological management of pain and anxiety during emergency procedures in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(5):337-354.

14 Ernst A.A., Marvez-Vails E., Nick T.G., et al. LAT versus TAC for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:151-154.

15 Blackburn P.A., Butler K.H., Hughes M.J., et al. Comparison of tetracaine–adrenaline–cocaine (TAC) with topical lidocaine–adrenaline (TLE): Efficacy and cost. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:315-317.

16 Loryman B., Davies F., Chavada G., Coats T. Consigning “brutacaine” to history: a survey of pharmacological techniques to facilitate painful procedures in children in emergency departments in the UK. [see comment]. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(11):838-840.

17 Priestley S., Kelly A.M., Chow L., et al. Application of topical local anesthetic at triage reduces treatment time for children with lacerations: a randomized controlled trial.[see comment]. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(1):34-40.

18 Sectish T.C. Use of sedation and local anesthesia to prepare children for procedures. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55:909-916.

19 Seropian R., Reynolds B. Wound infection after preoperative depilatory versus razor preparation. Am J Surg. 1971;121:251.

20 Moscati R.M., Mayrose J., Reardon R.F., Janicke D.M., Jehle D.V. A multicenter comparison of tap water versus sterile saline for wound irrigation.[see comment]. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(5):404-409.

21 Stevenson T.R., Thacker J.G., Rodeheaver G.T., et al. Cleansing the traumatic wound by high pressure syringe irrigation. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians. 1976;5:17-21.

22 Wheeler C.B., Rodeheaver G.T., Thacker J.G., et al. Side effects of high pressure irrigation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:775-778.

23 Al-Nammari S.S., Quyn A.J. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Conservative management or suturing for small, uncomplicated hand wounds. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(3):217-218.

24 Brown D.J., Jaffe J.E., Henson J.K. Advanced laceration management. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(1):83-99.

25 . Post traumatic wound infections. eTG complete (Internet). Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd. 2009. http://online.tg.org.au/ip/. [accessed 10.12.09]

26 Singer A.J., Mach C., Thode H.C.J., et al. Patient priorities with traumatic lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:683-686.

27 Lin K., Farinholt H., Reddy V., et al. The scientific basis for selecting surgical sutures. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2001;11:29-40.

28 Ratner D., Nelson B.R., Johnson T.M. Basic suture materials and suturing techniques. Semin Dermatol. 1994;13:20-26.

29 . Sutures and Needles. eMedicine. 2009. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/884838-overview. [accessed 15.11.09]

30 . Suturing Techniques. eMedicine. 2009. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1128240-overview. [accessed 16.11.09]

31 Khan A., Dayan P.S., Miller S., et al. Cosmetic outcome of scalp wound closure with staples in the pediatric emergency department: a prospective randomised trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002;18:171-173.

32 Holger J.S., Wandersee S.C., Hale D.B. Cosmetic outcomes of facial lacerations repaired with tissue-adhesive, absorbable, and nonabsorbable sutures. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(4):254-257.

33 Farion K.J., Osmond M.H., Hartling L., et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(2):110-118.

34 Singer A.J., Thode H.C.Jr. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am J Surg. 2004;187(2):238-248.

35 Quinn J., Cummings S., Callaham M., Sellers K. Suturing versus conservative management of lacerations of the hand: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325:299-305.

36 Broom J., Woods M. Management of bite injuries. Australian Prescriber. 2006;29:6-8.

37 . Bites, Animal: Treatment & Medication. eMedicine. 2009. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/768875-overview. [accessed 15.11.09]