Wilderness Medicine Education

Published on 24/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3139 times

Chapter 105 Wilderness Medicine Education

For online-only figures, please go to www.expertconsult.com image

The features of wilderness medicine that make it so attractive to an ever-increasing number of health care professionals also present challenges to its educational programs. The need for special attention to the learning process in the discipline has been called for in the peer-reviewed literature since the early 1990s.3,4,18,52 Some work has been done at the individual program level to incorporate evidence supporting modern concepts of adult education in health care. However, there are no universally accepted standards for the delivery of education or assessment of outcomes unique to this diverse discipline.

The spectrum of learners in wilderness medicine closely mirrors the types of experiences to which the discipline applies.76 On one end of the spectrum are laypeople who seek to acquire knowledge on basic first aid or exotic travel for reasons of safety or security. Next are those seeking formal search and rescue medical training, including conventional emergency medical technician (EMT) and paramedic training tailored to the wilderness setting. The next level is represented by expeditionary advisory and emergency care provided in isolated circumstances by multiple types of providers, including EMTs, nurses, and physicians. Finally, there is the group of technically oriented researchers and other professionals who seek topic- or environment-specific experience and fellowship with others that share their level of interest (Figure 105-1, online).

In 1991 the Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) proposed a model for developing curricula to teach wilderness prehospital emergency care (WPHEC).76 It was hoped that this would stimulate movement toward a disciplinary standard that would elevate the quality of this type of training throughout the United States and abroad. In this work the WMS noted the differences between wilderness and urban prehospital emergency care. These lie at the heart of what makes wilderness medicine education unique. They are summarized as follows:

The evolution of traditional models of adult education in health care has had a positive impact. They incorporate widely varied teaching techniques that stimulate adults to learn difficult material at the deepest levels. Wilderness medicine challenges these models to deliver even more. The diverse nature of both teachers and learners adds a new dimension. Traditional medical education fosters the development of individualistic attitudes rather than members that easily serve the needs of the group. Many wilderness medicine skills are not easy to learn and retain. They blend technical difficulty with the need for immediate recall and accuracy of application under adverse conditions with limited resources. Training often does not closely approximate the true impact of extreme surroundings on emergent or urgent care rendered in the wilderness.

A unique aspect of wilderness medicine is the close relationship of the often-harsh environment to maintenance of the knowledge base. Wilderness medicine practitioners are typically action-oriented professionals who prefer to learn and practice their craft in the outdoors. This speaks to the very nature of wilderness medicine. However, despite this link, there is a need to separate preparation and conditioning for the environment from education in order to facilitate the learning process.3 Logistics and varying skill levels of learners make it unreasonable to carry out full practical exercises for every wilderness medicine topic in every venue at which they are taught.

Health care education serves independent groups that are homogeneous in their levels of education and learning experience. Groups such as nursing, medical, EMT, and physician assistant students have independent educational programs. Their professional preparation is generally addressed using subsets of educational techniques with little cross-pollination. Once fully certified in their field, they carry these differences forth as learners and teachers in the continuing medical education/continuing education unit (CME/CEU) setting. It is from this educational melting pot that wilderness medicine draws its teachers.

In wilderness medicine the mixing of groups of learners is inevitable. The groups represent different learning styles and all levels of health care certification and experience. In any given wilderness medicine educational program can be found participants from most physician specialties seated next to EMTs of all levels and applications. Nursing vocations are well represented, as are PhD researchers, health care administrators, and laypeople with focused interests. Into this mix are thrown basic students from all health care vocations. Finally, the growing international attention given to wilderness medicine as an academic discipline adds another dimension. In no other area of health care is the educational challenge at the same time so daunting and so exciting!

Compounding the problem of diverse learners are the varied educational backgrounds and teaching styles of the educators in wilderness medicine. The process that prepares one for a career as a leading pulmonologist who does high-altitude research produces different cognitive and practical skills than do mountaineering and scuba diving. The skill set required to effectively teach any of those highly technical fields is yet different, albeit just as important. The logistics of career management and available time make blending of all of these into the consummate wilderness medicine educator a rare event. This leads to a pool of teachers whose credentials to teach are derived largely from their practical experience or notoriety rather than their having acquired specific training in adult education.

One might presume that the high levels of education possessed by individuals in these groups of learners would make the wilderness medicine educator’s job easier. Except for the truly passive attendees to whom effective learning is less important than are the setting and experience, this proves not to be the case. Learners’ expectations to receive exciting, well-taught education is understandably high, and they hold educators accountable. The well-prepared educator should study and understand the learner, just as an actor gets to know the audience or the politician tries to understand the electorate.

Despite the existence of numerous adult education theories and the large amount of published work in this area, especially in the subset of health care, there remains relatively little that specifically addresses wilderness medicine. Apart from anecdote, common sense, and the educational bias of the teacher, there is little hard evidence to support the preference of any application or theory over any other in this unique discipline. There can be no doubt that established techniques, both old and new, are of great use in wilderness medicine. However, there remain two fundamental challenges. The first is determining which of these techniques work best for specific circumstances and how to apply them with specific types of learners. The second is preparing a cadre of wilderness medicine educators who are formally trained to understand the process and to make these applications work.

Principles of Adult Learning

There are important differences between the education of children and adults. In modern educational parlance these are referred to as pedagogy and androgogy, respectively. These differences go far beyond the need for adults to be directive of their own learning and for children to be directed. Because of their general clientele, the details of the various learning theories may not be as important to wilderness medicine educators as an appreciation of some of their fundamental concepts. Although most wilderness medicine education is delivered to adult learners, the keen observer may note similarities to the education of school-age children. This speaks to the importance of attending to fundamental concepts. Much of the discipline is focused on acquiring emergent or urgent skills that are most effectively learned using basic educational models.

Basic Principles

Some basic themes exist throughout modern academic thinking on adult education. They may be explained differently and take various forms, but the principles hold steadfast. The concept of proximity means that learning is enhanced and mastery achieved when new information or skills are used immediately. Lectures in wilderness medicine are often necessary but are less effective in this regard than are hands-on and small-group seminars.

Learners generally prefer educational approaches that focus on concepts and principles instead of fact-based information.75 A concept derived from the teachings of Sir William Osler and known by nearly every classically trained physician holds that one should never spend time memorizing facts from a book at the expense of hands-on patient contact. This is why problem- and scenario-based learning has been incorporated into most modern health care education programs. The nuances of problem solving cannot easily be garnered from a book. Osler might say that precious time is best spent at the bedside rather than on what the student can be expected to read alone.

Learners respond favorably when they are able to participate in developing their own learning objectives.75 This is a pronounced difference between adult and child educational processes that should be properly accounted for and leveraged. The negotiation process between student and teacher that leads to properly established objectives builds relationships and trust that are at the foundation of the adult learning process. Allowing this to occur may seem counterintuitive, especially to educators who adopt a more directive style of teaching. However, participation by learners in goal setting facilitates ownership of the process and leads to higher levels of performance.

Feedback to students may be the most important ingredient to solidify learning and complete the education cycle.75 To be effective, this should be direct, specific, and individualized to each learner. There are many reasons why this may not occur in health care education. They range from the simple logistics of managing large classes to litigation and are often cited for failing to use this powerful educational tool.

Concepts, Theories, and Models

The Education Cycle

The notion that broad concepts of the process of learning can be described as a cycle is not new. Pattinson and Matthews58 recently applied it to wilderness medicine while planning a mountain medicine curriculum. As depicted in Figure 105-3, the program director first makes an assessment of the needs of the learners; he or she gets to know the audience. Next is the often-underestimated task of establishing tailored and focused learning objectives. The educator then selects teaching methods and settings that best accomplish the objectives while meeting the needs and expectations of the learners. Finally, after the experience, the educator makes an assessment to ascertain whether learning has occurred. This final step may be the most difficult and least attended of all. These elements will be addressed later.

Experience-Based Learning

Kolb’s model41 of learning is based on how individuals internalize and process learning experiences. Learners perform an action, referred to as a “concrete experience.” They then process the new information by “reflective observation.” Next they consider how the new information can be applied to their unique circumstances by “abstract conceptualization.” Having internalized the experience, they try it by “actively experimenting” with what they have learned to apply it in new and unique ways. This model is reflected in several of the teaching and assessment techniques discussed later, especially those that address concrete skills.

Education and the Human Organism

Setting the conditions for learning can be conceptualized by using Maslow’s famous explanation48 of how humans address fundamental needs. Vella’s work71,73 in popular education extends these ideas to the realm of education in the social context but still deals with the rudiments of human nature.

Unmet physiologic needs, such as warmth and hunger, tend to impair learning as the human organism prioritizes toward survival. Unfulfilled security needs, which Vella71 refers to as safety, distract from any process that does not pose an immediate threat. In adult education, safety issues may be subtle. Students who do not feel free to voice opinions or reveal a deficiency may be said to lack a safe learning environment. Identification with a group of learners addresses the need for belonging that is used by organized team sports and the military. The need for self-esteem may be met by recognition for academic achievement in front of one’s peers. Finally, the highest level of Maslow’s concept, self-actualization, is represented by satisfied expectations on the part of the learner. By expanding these concepts and directly addressing each in the classical hierarchical fashion, a program director can remove many obstacles to learning during the planning phase of the educational experience. A learning event that accounts for them will have a high likelihood of success and impact the student’s life well beyond the experience.

Principles of Androgogy

There have been numerous efforts to roll learning theories together into a concise package of tools for health care education. To this end, the work of Malcolm Knowles is widely read and often cited by education academics. He put structure to the concept of helping adults learn and called it “androgogy.” He suggested that through the principles of androgogy, adult learners are most successful when they are assisted in the process rather than directed through it.39 Knowles made five basic assumptions about adult learners from which he derived his principles. They can be summarized as follows: (1) Adults tend to have internally and not externally focused motivations for learning; (2) The learning process should be related to solving real-life problems; (3) Existing knowledge and experience greatly influence learning; (4) Self-direction improves the learning experience; and (5) Adults learn best with problem-based rather than subject-based methods. Knowles’ seven principles of androgogy are summarized in Box 105-1.

Learner-Centered Education

Jane Vella has applied learning theory in unique ways to the social context across different cultures. She recognized that education lay at the heart of many social issues. The teacher’s message is often lost in the delivery because of avoidable cross-cultural and interpersonal obstacles. She maintains that the key to adult learning is clear dialogue between the teacher and learner.7172 Educators too often fail to establish productive dialogue and hence select ineffective teaching approaches. Vella suggested that traditional hierarchical teacher-student roles be discouraged. Teachers become facilitators. Barriers to dialogue are “addressed and eradicated.” She offered to popular education a paradigm that places the learner at the center of the educational universe. Her principles link theory to practical use in a way that enables learning in challenging circumstances. Vella’s principles are summarized in Box 105-2.

Learning-Oriented Teaching Model

Cate and associates9 recently published their notion of a model of teaching based on concepts from educational psychology. Their proposals are meant to influence all aspects of adult education, especially those of curriculum design, teaching techniques, and teacher assessment. An attractive feature is a method to “inventory” and match teaching and learning styles to improve outcomes. The authors build a model around what they identify as the “components of learning” and the “amount of guidance” that learners require to navigate the experience. Their premise is that, because education seeks to enable people to “function independently,” the process should foster self-regulation of learning. In the model, learners mature from “externally guided” learning through “shared guidance” to self-guided or “internally guided” learning. This applies to both cognitive (what to learn) and affective (why to learn) components of learning.

Educational Techniques

There are a myriad of delivery techniques available to the modern medical educator. Despite being extensively studied across many disciplines, identifying a method of educating the medical learner in a way that results in consistently improved performance and outcomes exceeding other methods remains elusive.62 To be sure, there is no single method that is effective for all types of learners in all settings. In wilderness medicine this is compounded by the degree to which hands-on skills depend upon a solid grasp of basic science and the flexible application of clinical medicine.

Selection of the most effective methods depends largely on the setting as well as the expectations and needs of learners. The prudent curriculum designer will avoid incorporating attractive methods of presentation designed to capture attention without substantively improving the educational quality. Schweinfurth characterized the problem of finding the right mix of techniques when he described his use of interactive training among otolaryngology residents. He referenced comments from a focus group of trainees, discussing what he called “innovative learning strategies.” He found that learners were hesitant to endorse innovative strategies in order to avoid complex exercises that may compromise limited time available to conduct didactic sessions. His learners found some attempts at innovation as ‘too experimental’ or a ‘waste of time.’63 The lesson should be that innovation, as an end in and of itself, may not serve the learner. Innovation that causes the learner to walk away with a sense of improvement can be considered successful.

Lecture

Lecture is the most often used educational technique. It offers several important advantages. Large amounts of information can be delivered in relatively short periods of time. Planning is generally easier for the lecture format. It requires little logistic support and only one teacher. It works well for highly technical information that the learner will most likely have to study again in order to internalize. Lectures can be easily enhanced with audiovisual aids. All of this adds up to a degree of efficiency that is highly attractive to the resource-limited educator. In one small but interesting study, Reed62 illustrated that, despite the availability of highly technical and resource-intensive teaching methods, a simple “low-cost, low-tech” lecture approach can offer rewards in terms of improved skill performance (Figure 105-4, online).

The lecture technique has several equally important disadvantages. Learning is highly dependent on the delivery skill of the teacher. Because it is passive, many adult learners do not respond as well to this approach. It is generally accepted that levels of retention of material presented by pure lecture are lower than more active teaching techniques.67 There is generally limited opportunity for hands-on applications and practice. Thus the usefulness is limited in some areas of wilderness medicine that are largely skills oriented. The more restricted the opportunity for student questioning and dialogue, the less effective this technique becomes. Students can often more effectively learn by themselves information to be presented by lecture. Brookfield8 discussed methods to enhance the lecture as a means to communicate information (Box 105-4).

Problem-Based Learning

A highly effective trend in health care education is the use of problem-based learning (PBL). PBL can take various forms, but generally learners are presented with a problem and are guided through a structured discussion that leads to a preestablished solution. This learner-centered approach has proven popular among students and demonstrates comparable outcomes when compared with other, more traditional formats. An interesting aspect to PBL is that student-led experiences tend to be more highly favored among participants than those facilitated by faculty, yet the outcomes remain at least comparable in terms of satisfaction and examination scores.29,66

PBL offers great versatility to the curriculum planner. It can be used whether the focus is on acquiring pure fact-based knowledge or practical skills. It is most often applied in the small-group setting and therefore may pose logistic challenges in some space and resource-limited settings. It complements the strengths of small-group learning in that it reinforces communication and problem-solving skills, teamwork, individual responsibility for learning, and the need to share knowledge.77 It tends to give the best results when it is structured and forces learners to use critical thinking skills. It fosters the process of analysis, organized problem solving, and decision making using group discussion to direct and reinforce learning. The general format for PBL is presented in Box 105-5.5

Scenarios and Role-Play

Scenario-based and role-play training is familiar to prehospital emergency care educators but less widely used in traditional medical education. It maximizes many of the strengths of newer approaches to adult education because it guides self-motivated students through a process of “discovery” of the information.45 The main role for teachers in this format is to facilitate, not direct, the learning process.30 Being an expert in the clinical details of each case is less important than understanding how to apply problem-based learning. This method is often scripted and makes use of actors, props, and moulage to simulate real-life situations. The logistics of carrying out this aggressive training technique may be prohibitive to some programs, but the investment is worth the effort in terms of improved outcomes and retention of knowledge by learners. Nearly all organizations that train prehospital wilderness medicine practitioners use some form of complex case- or scenario-based learning program. The use of role-play has benefits beyond the teaching and development of technical skills. One recent randomized controlled trial confirmed the utility of using role-play when teaching technical skills in the area of communication. The authors of this small study of 36 medical students randomized to learn a skill with and without role-playing concluded that, although there were no differences in technical performance between groups, the introduction of role-play as a training method enhanced the realism of technical skills training and led to better patient-physician communication53 (Figure 105-5).

Discussion

The technique of discussion is a versatile and highly effective teaching tool that is rooted in behavioral science. People learn better when the information is presented in ways that challenge them to process it in more than one way. Although not as efficient as lecture in terms of the quantity of information that can be delivered, it offers advantages to the wilderness medicine educator when teaching problem-solving skills and broad concepts that can be applied to many types of scenarios. Students readily internalize material because they have to intellectually manipulate it in various ways. The information is introduced, processed, and discussed. Students modify their own notions and then formulate solutions based on their new internal constructs of the problem. Learning is guided by the facilitator-teacher and reinforced by the group, which is all going through the same process and adopting a similar problem-solving skill set.

There are two basic modes of discussion-based learning.43 The Socratic questioning method challenges students to identify the most important features of a specific problem and then reconstruct it using general principles that are the true focus of the discussion. Developmental discussion approaches the problem in parts. It keeps all students focused on one part at a time and takes advantage of the group setting to ensure that teaching points are addressed.

Teacher-facilitators may highlight the discussion with the powerful tools of analogy, discovery, and induction to stimulate learning and ensure retention.16 Analogy illustrates concepts by asking students to visualize using examples with which they are already familiar. The process of discovery leads students through a sequence of steps from the most basic to the more complex to guide them to the final goal of deeper understanding of the principal learning objective. Induction asks students to take general lessons from specific examples or experiences, make comparisons, and draw new conclusions relevant to the learning objective. These three techniques can be applied in any setting that involves learner interaction with the teacher.

Small-Group Learning

The selection of a teaching method is highly influenced by class size and quantity of information that must be learned. Large classes that must digest substantial amounts of information tend to push faculty into selecting passive modes of teaching. The traditional CME conference at which hundreds of attendees review highly technical material is an example of this. However, passive, lecture-based methods are not the most effective and often not the most efficient for all types of learning, especially in wilderness medicine. It is now widely accepted that skills-based learning presented in a small-group setting is a better way to teach practical skills44 (Figure 105-6, online).

The problems inherent in teaching large groups can often be overcome by adopting a combined approach. In this strategy, the information is delivered in parts to the entire group. Learners are then broken into small groups to conduct activities that allow them to discuss it, use it, and solidify learning. There is usually a more favorable teacher-to-learner ratio and greater self-direction of learning by the group.

Wilderness medicine offers ample opportunity to use the combined approach and the pure small-group venue for teaching. Both rely upon the process and mechanics of group experiences. The simple act of breaking a large group into smaller groups does not constitute small-group teaching. This method requires skill and experience with group processes on the part of the educator to avoid pitfalls that detract from learning. When done well, small-group learners take away solid lessons and the strong relationships that they had to build to get them. If done poorly, learners walk away dissatisfied with negative attitudes toward learning, the setting, and the discipline.

To understand group learning is to understand how the individuals within the group interact.

Bruce Tuckman’s original concept of the developmental sequence of small groups should greatly influence how teachers plan and conduct these activities.26,36,69,70 The general strategy for teachers is to become familiar with the stages, recognize their manifestations, and use a planned approach that gradually releases control of the teaching process to the group as members become more able to direct their own learning.

Group members get acquainted and become oriented to the setting during the forming stage. Student anxiety may hinder learning as interpersonal dynamics take shape. Students tend to adopt a passive mode of learning. They respond best during this stage to a more directive teaching style with clearly defined expectations and structured events.

During the storming stage, the group’s identity begins to take shape among some members, while others continue to seek individual goals over those of the group. Dissent may be voiced about leader- or teacher-directed tasks. Teachers should demonstrate strong but patient leadership to move through this stage without alienating group members. They should openly encourage support for group-generated goals.

The group identity solidifies during the norming stage. Individual ownership of group goals and a greater affinity for teamwork are hallmarks. As they gain a sense of safety, members in their interactions with other participants display genuineness. Leadership tasks should be directed to group members. Learning activities, such as role-play and case discussions, become most useful.

During the performing stage, the teacher acts only as a resource for the group that has developed to a point of relative autonomy. The group is able to plan and conduct its own activities, as well as make self-assessments in an organized and productive fashion. Energy is spent on learning rather than on the interpersonal mechanics of the process.

The role of the teacher in a small-group setting should be oriented toward facilitation of learning rather than direct delivery of material. However, the teacher remains accountable and cannot take a completely hands-off approach and expect that objectives will be met. By attending to the details of process, the teacher ensures that the learners do not have to perform this task. The teacher creates the proper learning environment and keeps the process on track. Some common mistakes made by small-group “facilitators” include the following: the teacher presents a lecture; the teacher talks too much; students do not participate unless prompted or directly questioned; the students lack preparation for the session (e.g., prereading); there are overbearing, domineering students; and participants want to be provided a quick and simple solution to the problem rather than engage in the process of group discovery.35

Despite not being part of the learner group, the teacher has great influence over the process and the outcomes. A poorly prepared teacher ignores the internal dynamics of the group and sets up the experience for failure. Some techniques available to avoid these problems include: agreed-upon rules for the conduct of sessions; clearly stated tasks and objectives; use of the rhetorical method of questioning to stimulate thinking; taking a lengthy pause after posing a question, allowing students to answer; not offering immediate solutions or guidance unless participants appear to be taking the wrong path; attending to body language and mannerisms of all participants, both when they are speaking and when they are listening; addressing the entire group, rather than a single student, with mannerisms and eye contact.35

The general steps in preparing for and conducting small-group teaching are summarized as follows:

Small-group learning is a rewarding and highly effective method of teaching. It requires preparation and experience. The characteristics of small-group learning make it the teaching method of choice for many wilderness medicine educational activities, especially when combined with other techniques such as simulation, scenarios, and case presentations.

Distance Learning

Distance learning, traditionally provided via correspondence courses, has taken an entirely new direction. With proliferation of the Internet, more people than ever find it possible to further their education without physically entering the classroom. A little-used tool in wilderness medicine education is web-based distance learning. It has found widespread application in other academic areas such that health care educators have embraced many of the benefits of this rapidly evolving tool.

The advantages that the Internet offers to medical educators are many. Even courses that are not offered as complete web-based packages can be supported by limited Internet applications such as e-mail, distribution of materials, enrollment, needs assessments, and testing. To this can be added videoconferencing, discussion boards, live topic-specific chat rooms, and presentation of live events via video streaming. Nearly any software application that can be used on a home computer can be offered in some fashion over the Internet. With the advent of high-speed connectivity and constantly changing security programs, obstacles to efficiency and learner security have been minimized. Virtual learning environment software enables all of these applications to be managed efficiently while keeping the focus on the learner and not the technology.32

The ability to hyperlink from any web page brings an entire world of web-based information to the learner with a few clicks. The speed and degree of access that modern learners have to information create implications for adult education that theorists never imagined.

For all of its attraction, the Internet is not a panacea for wilderness medicine education. There are two main disadvantages. First is the need for learners to posses sufficient computing power to allow for rapid and efficient downloading and presentation of course materials. This is made worse when they travel to remote locations. Perhaps the biggest drawback to web-based learning in wilderness medicine is its dependence on technology and the support that goes with it. Large organizations that offer this approach find it necessary to hire full-time support staff to provide a comprehensive and reliable product. Many wilderness medicine educators find it difficult to dedicate the resources necessary to bring it to full implementation. However, even small organizations find great usefulness in some applications.

For many wilderness medicine topics, passive approaches to learning, such as distance learning online, suffice to deliver information. It is up to the student to embrace the style and internalize the material. Basic science and clinical topics that can also be taught in lecture format with audiovisual aids work well when presented online. However, much of the body of wilderness medicine knowledge, especially that dealing with the prehospital phase of care, is largely experiential and requires direct interaction with other people.

There are numerous ways that education can be delivered online. The two broad categories are pure distance learning and the hybrid web-based course. In a completely web-based program, all course work, materials, sessions, and assessments are transmitted via the Internet; even assistance from teachers occurs by e-mail or live message applications. This method is a true virtual learning experience. Alternatively, many organizations offer hybrid online courses in which students use Internet applications as an additional tool to complete portions of the course but are required to participate in periodic face-to-face sessions.

Many health care practitioners involve themselves in wilderness medicine because of the fellowship with other uniquely qualified and experienced professionals. As web-based applications become more widely used in wilderness medicine, educators will be increasingly challenged to ensure that learners do not feel isolated from their wilderness medicine peers and role models. The learner, not the technology, must remain at the center of the effort. Internet applications must be selected for how they enhance the learning experience, not because they are high-tech and progressive.

Field Experiences

Medical schools and residencies are following the lead of commercial WPHEC programs and moving learners out of the classroom and into the field.45 Rotations and electives that include field-training experiences of various lengths are now highly sought after. These have the effect of maintaining high levels of student interest and satisfaction. They offer direct relevance and immediate application of newly learned skills. When coupled with effective group process and feedback, the benefits of field training make this a powerful venue for skills-oriented education. These experiences are most often part of an overall curriculum that incorporates other techniques, such as lecture and problem-based learning, in a didactic setting (Figure 105-7).

Concerns include safety and security of participants as well as liability issues for the sponsoring organization. The logistic support package can be expensive and complex. The quality of the experience is greatly influenced by uncontrollable factors such as weather and climate. Proper screening and selection of participants are critical to success, especially in programs that are conducted in remote locations or in physically demanding environments. Multiple techniques, such as scenarios and hands-on practical exercise, can be applied simultaneously to maximize the learning experience. Field training affords an opportunity to introduce nonmedical skills such as leadership, wilderness survival, and land navigation.45 This not only generates interest but also creates well-prepared learners and an overall lower level of risk.

Competency-Based Medical Education

Description

Since 1981 the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has served as the principal accrediting organization for physician residency training programs in the United States. As such, the ACGME drives improvement in the overall quality of health care in the United States through development of policies governing how physicians are trained and by accrediting training programs based on those policies.2,47

The ACGME Outcome Project was designed to improve the quality of graduate medical education (GME) by shifting the fundamental focus of how education is delivered and assessed. Rather than emphasizing and rewarding traditional, process-oriented programs, the Outcome Project refocused GME on a national level by establishing core educational principles to use assessments of the outcomes of education and training to determine success. Accreditation would be granted based on a series of measurable outcomes or competencies intended to demonstrate an individual resident’s ability to provide effective patient care, as well as the residency program’s ability to provide such training (outcomes-oriented education).

GME programs now must teach and evaluate residents using techniques and tools based on six core competencies. Moreover, it is a requirement that accredited GME programs incorporate these competencies into curriculum design, development of training objectives, and building of 360-degree assessment systems for both faculty and learners. Programs must also validate the data and methods they use to train and assess performance using external measures2,37 (Box 105-6).

Applicability to Wilderness Medicine Education

As with most GME programs that have been able to grow and adapt existing methods to align with the ACGME competency-based requirement, wilderness medicine programs must adapt. For example, programs that offer medical school or residency elective experiences will have to demonstrate curricula based on well-built, measurable objectives that are based on the ACGME core competencies. Instruments, such as summative assessments of learners seeking credit from parent academic institutions, will require competency-based formatting. Fortunately, most wilderness medicine educational programs incorporate fundamental concepts of adult education discussed earlier and likely require only modest changes to existing curricula, training methods, and assessment tools. Not all wilderness medicine programs will require full or strict compliance with ACGME guidelines with respect to outcomes-based education. Those that wish to be fully ACGME compliant should follow the general guidelines offered by the ACGME. Programs are expected to provide learning opportunities in each general competency domain. They will use multiple and overlapping methods to assess learners and outcomes data to enable them to demonstrate continuous improvement in the educational program. Competency-based assessment tools are widely available on the Internet and can be modified for almost any wilderness medicine educational setting. When evaluating processes for ACGME alignment, programs should consider three areas. Do the learners achieve the established learning objectives? Can the program demonstrate this with evidence? How does the program demonstrate continuous improvement in its educational process?47

A number of assessment tools that have been developed to enable generation and tracking of outcome metrics are available through the ACGME Outcome Project Toolbox.2 Each of the tools has been made available for use by residency programs and may be adapted to nearly any medical education situation. Not all tools are suitable to assess all six competencies. Therefore, ACGME advocates using several tools when assessing learners in any given setting. This strategy results in a more valid overall competency-based assessment of each learner.

Assessing Learners’ Needs

Performing a proper assessment of the needs of students before designing a curriculum leads to a fulfilling experience for all. Jane Vella claims that this critical step is necessary to “truly honor the time investment of the learner and create the conditions for meaningful dialogue between learner and teacher.”71 People whose motivations for learning are ignored “quickly become bored and indifferent.” They often walk away from the experience dissatisfied or without completing the program. Some examples of information the wilderness medicine course planner would want to know are:

Learner-centered education principles tell us that the needs assessment should lead to modification of course content or structure to suit the individualized needs of the learner. To become fully invested, students should be able to shape to some degree what will be taught to them. Thorough modification of curriculum content based on a formal needs assessment may be impractical for standardized certification experiences such as wilderness first responder (WFR) courses. Detailed needs assessments are seldom done for wilderness medicine CME conferences despite the fact that due to the great variation in the levels of professional education, needs assessment may be of greatest value in this venue. Advance study of students’ expectations and reasons for attending allows for more focused and tailored instruction. The needs assessment can be easily accomplished with a questionnaire delivered by postal or electronic mail, telephone contact, or face-to-face interview. The actual format is not as important as the mere act of soliciting input from students. Allowing them to actively dialogue about their learning will achieve buy-in. The curriculum design becomes overtly accountable to the students and results in much higher levels of internal motivation.

Learning Objectives

An area of academic wilderness medicine that is often given cursory attention is that of establishing objectives for learning activities. Many educators make an attempt, but well-written objectives are far too rare for the amount of education that is being delivered in the discipline.

A learning objective is a collection of words, pictures, or diagrams that tells others what the educator intends for learners to achieve.46 When properly written, objectives establish outcomes rather than describe process. The basic purpose of teaching is to facilitate learning resulting in measurable outcomes. A learning activity is a process designed to achieve a result. What students actually learn is the result and should be described in advance by objectives.25 The basic functions of learning objectives are to:

Learning objectives should be tailored to a specific learning activity or session and not used as goals for an entire course. During precourse preparation, objectives should be provided to faculty to assist them in preparing their sessions and to the learners so they will know what to expect and how to prepare.

An objective is constructed by describing an activity that elaborates specific knowledge or skills that a learner will be able to demonstrate following a successful learning activity. Well-written learning objectives are measurable by written testing, observation, hands-on problem solving, or other methods of assessment. Words or phrases such as know, think, appreciate, learn, comprehend, remember, perceive, understand, be aware of, be familiar with, have knowledge of, and grasp the significance are difficult to measure and are of little use when writing learning objectives in wilderness medicine.10 Examples of learning objectives that illustrate the concepts of being specific and measurable are as follows: The student will be able to …

Strong objectives, in addition to being performance based, specific, and measurable, are preceded by a condition statement to set the stage and aid with measurement specificity.46 In writing objectives, answer the following questions: “What should the participants be able to do, and how well must they do it?” Objectives must be clear and attainable. They are often constructed in an “if … then” sequence to facilitate clarity. Focus on acquisition or reinforcement of a specific element of knowledge or skill.25 Recommended styles for constructing objectives include the following:

This last phrase is followed by a specific performance verb and the desired learning outcome. Examples of performance verbs are found in Table 105-1. The following is an example of a properly prepared set of objectives:10

More theoretical treatments of preparing learning objectives are based on complex notions of learning theory and behavioral psychology. They describe objectives as appealing to domains of information processing or whether objectives are based on achievement or outcomes. To summarize, well-written learning objectives are tailored to a single learning activity or a closely related group of activities; address preidentified needs and interests of the learner; are specific to levels and types of performance; are achievable, realistic, and time specific; and use verbs that specify behaviors that can easily be measured.

Assessing Learning

The last step in the education cycle (see Figure 105-3) is making a formal assessment of whether or not learning has occurred.58 There are several reasons for testing in wilderness medicine education beyond the obvious need to validate and certify students. Learning assessment can be a valuable extension of the learning process. Kromann recently reported that “testing as a final activity in an in-hospital resuscitation skills course for medical students increased learning outcomes compared with spending an equal amount of time in practice.”42 Students seldom come away from a properly conducted and reviewed examination without having learned something. It can be said that this type of learning by assessment is the capstone of knowledge synthesis. Each examination completes the education cycle at a particular level and allows progression to the next with a higher degree of competence.

Learning assessments can be grouped for convenience into two general categories: formative and summative. Formative assessments are made before and throughout a course of instruction and have both learning and testing dimensions. Feedback after formative assessment is critical to shape additional learning. This type of assessment may take the form of a diagnostic examination to assess learners’ needs and establish lesson objectives, or an intermediate examination to assess progress at a particular phase of training.

Summative assessments are generally used at the end of either a critical phase of training or completion of a course. This type of assessment is more often applied for certification and validation than as an extension of learning. Final course examinations and tests that lead to state or national certification in a vocation are examples of summative assessments.

Feedback

Regardless of which tools a program incorporates into the overall assessment system, dedicated opportunities for immediate feedback on performance must be used to ensure maximal learning. Although formative and summative evaluations capture performance over a given period of time that may contain numerous individual events, immediate feedback is designed to give learners the opportunity to make adjustments based on their performance during specific events or very brief and focused training periods. Learners that are not provided this type of feedback will be left to rely on happenstance to succeed at course objectives (Figure 105-8).

Feedback is especially important in the types of hands-on, scenario-based clinical training frequently conducted during wilderness medicine courses. Hands-on skill training requires concrete demonstration of proficiency and does not rely on an evaluator making presumptions of a learner’s thought processes to make an assessment. Properly conducted feedback makes an immediate connection between outcomes of learner actions and expectations as established by goals and objectives. This solidifies learning in ways that are impossible with other evaluation tools. However, the benefit decreases rapidly as time from the event to delivery of feedback increases. Effective feedback is given by the person who observes the event and is done so immediately after completion.13

The 360-Degree Evaluation

As part of the ACGME focus on outcomes-based education, accredited residency training programs in the United States provide objectives-based assessments of learner performance in six core competencies (described earlier). In addition, programs now incorporate an assessment system that receives input from multiple evaluators. This is also called a 360-degree evaluation system. The ACGME lists this type of evaluation method as a “highly recommended” tool.2

The 360-degree evaluation accepts contributions to the development of learners by all types of people in the general sphere of his or her influence. It offers training programs a process by which numerous and varied perspectives may be used to more accurately assess all aspects of performance. It is presumed that observations of learners made from different perspectives are more valid than are traditional, more narrowly focused assessments. Assessment tools that allow for efficient organization of 360-degree evaluations are available in the ACGME Toolbox and are generally regarded as valid when used in correct circumstances.2,13,28

The usefulness of 360-degree evaluations in specific wilderness medicine training programs has not been evaluated, and instruments relevant to these settings have not been proposed. However, those widely available and validated within graduate medical education can easily be modified and incorporated. The usefulness of this method of learner evaluation will depend on factors such as length of the course, contact with noncourse participants (e.g., role-players and patients), and types of events used as training tools (e.g., small-group field-training events); 360-degree evaluations may be found to be more relevant to courses that are longer, with more varied types of learner interactions over time (Box 105-7).

Reliability and Validity

Two key concepts to understand when designing learning assessment tools for wilderness medicine courses are reliability and validity. These are applied separately when discussing written and skills-oriented testing.35,65 They are particularly relevant to WPHEC courses such as WFR or wilderness emergency medical technician (WEMT), which rely heavily on skills-based testing.

A reliable testing instrument consistently measures the desired outcome no matter how many times it is administered. There are a host of factors that influence reliability. The length of time it takes to complete a test, characteristics of the examinees, logistical and administrative problems, and variation in examiner methods all act to decrease the reliability of an examination and mask learners’ true level of competence. One cannot address the validity of an assessment tool until reliability is achieved.

A valid testing instrument is one that measures what it was designed to measure. Simply put, it reveals the actual level of learner competence. Apart from reliability problems, issues that negatively influence validity include cases and scenarios that are not directly relevant to the learning objectives, poorly structured or improperly selected test questions, testing stations that do not adequately examine the skills that were taught, and failure to seek expert review of course content during the design phase. The measure of validity is done in terms of examination scores. Having removed obstacles to reliability and validity (see Evaluating the Assessment Tool, later), the educator may use scores to make a direct link from teaching methods to achieving learning objectives.

The two main approaches to learning assessment in health care that are pertinent to wilderness medicine are written and skills-based testing. One-on-one teaching with feedback is useful in other areas of health care education, such as primary nursing programs and the training of interns and residents but is often impractical for wilderness medicine teaching activities.

Written assessments remain the cornerstone of health care education despite the proliferation of progressive teaching techniques like hands-on skills development and problem-based learning. The questioning format of written assessment may take many forms, but all generally test reasoning ability and accumulation of knowledge as opposed to practical application.

Schuwirth and van der Vleuten proposed a list of criteria to compare the advantages and disadvantages of various types of written test formats and questions35: reliability and validity (as discussed earlier), educational impact (how students prepare for examinations, hence learn the material), cost-effectiveness (expense in terms of money and time), and acceptability (how both students and teachers view the examination’s effectiveness and relevance). To account for these factors, the most preferred method of developing written examinations is to use several types of test questions in each instrument. The types of examination questions that may be considered include true-false, single best answer multiple choice, multiple true or false, short answer “fill in the blank,” essay, case-based key feature, and extended matching. A thorough treatment of each can be found throughout the literature.

Skills-based assessment is particularly relevant to much of health care education, especially in wilderness medicine. It is the mainstay of competency testing for most prehospital courses. The two general subtypes of skills-based assessment used in wilderness medicine are skills subset testing (sessions focused on a single or a few closely related skills) and case/scenario-based skills stations. Basic learning theory tells us that this popular testing method should be highly effective in achieving objectives and in delivering highly retained learning. This bears out in practical application. The disadvantages of skills-based assessments are centered around two areas. First, the logistic requirements necessary to conduct high-quality testing can be burdensome. Second, examiners require a high degree of skill with regard to testing process and mechanics to ensure reliability and validity of results. The general steps in conducting a skills-based learning assessment session are as follows:

Evaluating the Assessment Tool

Educators must evaluate their learning assessment tools to ensure reliability and validity. A couple of simple methods may be used. For written assessments, first review examination scores and compare them to attendance. It should come as no surprise that students who do not attend specific sessions would do poorly on test questions designed to assess learning on that topic. If this level of analysis points to attendance problems, then there are other issues in the course such as objectives, content, and quality of instruction that should be addressed before the quality of the examination.

The process of test item analysis correlates the number of examinees that missed a given question with overall test scores.15 This can be done on two levels. The first is within the group that was being tested at a given course. The second is over a period of time among several groups that took the same examination. As with any internal assessment tool, the latter style leads to stronger conclusions but takes longer to complete. Internal pattern analysis of test scores can reveal that either the instruction was bad or the test question was not well written. The basic principle is that if a large percentage of students received a high score on an examination but a similarly large percentage missed a particular test item, then either construction of the item or the teaching method is likely at fault. This technique loses power and specificity at lower overall examination scores among those that missed the item(s) in question.

Skills-based learning assessments can be evaluated for quality using similarly simple analytical tools.15 The attendance comparison mentioned above is an obvious starting point when reviewing individual performance.

Mechanics or logistics of the testing setting that seem irrelevant to the actual demonstration of knowledge and skills may impact test scores. An examiner that did not attend precourse briefings and is not familiar with what was taught, or worse, with what is expected, poses a problem. This can be revealed by noting a large percentage of examinees doing poorly at a given skill station despite doing well at other stations designed to test related skills. Notably strong students that fail a particular station may be another warning sign. Testing stations that use role-playing with scenarios must account for the influence of the role-players. Poorly briefed actors that do not follow the script can make or break an otherwise competent learner.

Having made attendance comparisons and ruled out problems with the setting, examiners, and role-players, the problem is most likely the quality of teaching if many students are doing poorly at a given skill station. Retraining and retesting may be in order.

Teaching in Wilderness Medicine

Good Teachers

What of the act of teaching in wilderness medicine? What is unique about the discipline in comparison with other areas of health care education that calls for special attention to the delivery? As mentioned before, wilderness medicine instruction is often and understandably disconnected from the environment about which it informs. Teaching the fundamentals of altitude, depth, cold, or heat and their impact on the human condition requires that the initial knowledge base be largely acquired in a “safe” environment. The experiential phase that we presume solidifies learning for wilderness medicine practitioners often occurs in another setting at a different time, if it occurs at all. Therefore, to be effective, the material must be presented by faculty that possess the ability to captivate and motivate learners. Paul Auerbach proclaimed, “The enthusiasm of the instructor is plainly apparent and can carry or lose the day. Regardless of the educational technique chosen, one must be ‘into it’ or the students will be soon flocking out of it.”3

Just as wilderness medicine practitioners must draw from a solid base of knowledge to be creative when providing care in austere surroundings, wilderness medicine faculty must be familiar with and use all of the theory-based tools available to them to be successful, even in less-than-optimal teaching settings. Steve Donelan highlighted the issue by noting, “Instructors tend to assume that if students stay awake and interested, pass the tests, and write nice comments on the evaluation forms, then the course is successful.”14 Good teaching does not just happen. Highly effective wilderness medicine teachers are as proficient with the teaching skill set as they are with the clinical “tools of the trade” in their unique area of expertise.

As in highly technical health care fields, the credibility of wilderness medicine faculty is paramount. Beyond the obvious reasons for needing credibility as a teacher, most wilderness medicine learners are already well placed in their respective fields with years of educational experience behind them. Moreover, it is not uncommon for wilderness medicine faculty to be addressing participants that are not only proficient at the topic in question but may be leading experts or researchers in that area. According to Auerbach, “If a teacher wishes to do more than read from a script, he or she must have some first-hand experience in the environment. Students are better than we imagine at rating our technical skills.”3

For years medical educators have studied the notion that the best clinical teachers all display a common set of characteristics. Numerous authors list qualities of good teachers based on learner surveys and outcomes assessments.33,34,75 Some of these have special applicability to wilderness medicine education:

The Educational Environment

Hutchinson recently pointed out that “in adult learning theories, teaching is as much about setting the context and climate for learning as it is about imparting knowledge or sharing expertise.”32 Nearly everything that the teacher does influences either the students’ ability or willingness to learn. Wilderness medicine course planners that account for these factors will enjoy a much higher likelihood of success than those that simply present material with little accounting for process and environment. Two factors that can be influenced by providing the right environment are the motivation of learners and their perception of how relevant the material is to their lives. Adult learners are quick to identify a poorly prepared program. They derive their energy directly from the faculty and will respond in kind to the amount of effort that has gone into providing for the proper learning environment.

Motivating factors to consider when planning an educational experience include physical needs and comfort issues that may hinder learning, safety and security, group inclusion and identification, self-esteem (making learners feel important and relevant), and self-actualization through self-directed learning. This all leads to academic fulfillment resulting in deeply ingrained understanding of the material. These mirror Maslow’s model for hierarchic needs satisfaction.

Tangible characteristics of the environment that impact learning seem insignificant to the overall goals of the course and are easily overlooked. If they are not properly accounted for in the course plan, learners may sense a lack of respect. The best presented material by the most captivating, world-renowned teacher will not hold students’ attention if their primary motivation needs are not addressed. These include factors such as food and beverage availability; frequency of rest breaks; ambient lighting, noise, and temperature of the setting; lodging accommodations; access to telephone and Internet connections; access to public transportation and airports; and the availability of recreation during nontraining hours.

Although it is impossible to solve every problem in any setting that is remote or exciting enough to host a wilderness medicine educational experience, problems should be addressed to the extent possible. Decisions should be made early about the adequacy of the setting balanced against the need to conduct realistic training in or near the wilderness environment. Compromises may be made that trade some degree of realism for comfort and vice-versa. Potential problem areas should be made known to participants well in advance so that they may make choices about the importance of these factors and balance them against their own desire to receive the training (Figure 105-9).

Training Aids

Audiovisual

Audio and visual aids may take many forms limited only by the creativity of the teacher. The most basic may be a sand-covered stone upon which simple diagrams are drawn that communicate simple ideas and relationships. The most complex may be a multimedia presentation that incorporates diagrams, video, audio, and a computer-based interactive application to enhance learning by appealing to multiple senses. Despite the obvious advantages afforded by technology in preparing appealing and effective learning activities, pitfalls exist. These are not often represented by the lack of visual aids, but rather by the overbearing, confusing, or complex nature of those that are used.

The basic roles of visual aids are to illustrate the organization of a topic as it develops, to reinforce or highlight key material, and to provide an organizational “anchor” for the group that allows members to take notes, think, pose questions, and keep pace with the session.17

Examples of simple low-tech aids include terrain models, sand tables, chalkboards, paper charts, maps, and butcher-block flip charts. These offer significant advantages to wilderness medicine teachers in that they are inexpensive and retain their usefulness in austere settings. The disadvantages of these dependable visual aids include the time required to prepare them, the fact that many are good for a single use or a single topic, and their limited flexibility if changes in teaching direction are made. Perhaps the most detracting feature to some is that faculty cannot easily hide a lack of preparation behind these simple devices.

High-tech audio and visual aids include overhead projectors, video machines, 35-mm slide projectors, and computer software–driven and projected presentations. These all have the advantages of flexibility and appeal to multiple senses. If used properly and in the right setting, they enhance learning and provide a professional look to a degree that is unattainable with simple devices.

The obvious disadvantages of the high-tech methods to the wilderness medicine educator include expense and their reliance on additional technology such as electricity, lightbulbs, software, power cords, connectors, remote controls, and computers. Not only must faculty be comfortable with their subject, they must be facile with computers and software packages. Many “high-powered” presentations have been aborted because of lack of a simple piece of equipment, an incompatible software program, or a non–technically prepared speaker.

A mistake when preparing computer-based presentations is the tendency to want to use all of the “bells and whistles.” There is a wide selection of graphics, animations, and interactive tools available to the educator with even the most basic familiarity with standard software. The trick to preparing good presentations is to resist the temptation to use them. Anything that distracts learners from the main message of the graphic should be avoided. This includes sound effects, animated characters, moving text, and “wild and crazy” fonts. Some background colors and patterns work best with certain colors and fonts of text and large versus small room and screen sizes. Although there are some limited conventions in this regard, the best advice is to keep it simple and personally test any presentation in the place where it will be used.

Textbooks

Like any tool, textbooks are designed for specific purposes. It is important to address this issue before selecting a book to support an educational activity. The most important factor when selecting a textbook is to choose the right tool for the job. Some are intended to be encyclopedic and used mostly for reference. These tend to be larger and cover topics from a theoretical and evidence-based perspective. Although they act as good references and study resources, they may be unwieldy for use in wilderness medicine courses that focus on skills or are conducted in remote locations. They generally have greater application in the areas of wilderness medicine that cover theoretical and highly technical topics such as infectious disease and tropical, aerospace, and dive medicine.

Some smaller texts are intended for use as summaries of larger works. These can even be condensed into quick-reference pocket versions. The disadvantage of these is the amount of information and important detail that is lost with each “condensation.” They are seldom used as primary texts for courses; rather, they are adjuncts for rapid access to information already available elsewhere.

A third type of textbook is designed for use as a practical study guide. These come in various forms, but all appeal to the more practical areas of wilderness medicine that focus on prehospital care and acquisition of hands-on skills. Course planners may organize an entire curriculum around these highly flexible texts, or they may use certain sections to support an existing program of instruction.

Formats for modern textbooks include hard copy, electronic (CD-ROM), and fully Internet based. Publishers are now integrating their hard-copy texts with web-based tools that offer advanced features such as updates, searches, and downloading of graphics and additional information.

Syllabus Material and Handouts

The main purpose of providing handouts is to supplement material provided in texts or presented in class. They are often used when faculty want to either summarize or reorganize information into a format that more closely matches learning objectives. Handouts may be used to provide background information when more superficial treatments of material are offered in texts designed for skills- or case-based learning. Other roles for handouts may be to provide a resource for the conduct of projects or self-examination and to update information presented in published texts (e.g., clinical guidelines and procedural protocols).

Handouts that are meant for preclass preparation should be provided before the session. Those meant to recap or summarize may be best provided after the session to avoid distraction.17 Some syllabus materials are meant to save students’ time in note taking by providing key points with spaces provided to fill in additional information. This serves the dual purpose of keeping students engaged and making them think about the information before summarizing it in their own words. This technique carries a risk that important information may be misquoted or missed entirely.

Handouts are sometimes intended for use as comprehensive study and preparation resources, much like a textbook. Settings where this may be most beneficial are resource-constricted courses held in remote locations that are not able to provide standard texts for all students to use.

A modern approach to the use of handouts is that of providing course materials either on a CD-ROM or in a web-based, downloadable version. This presents challenges to the wilderness medicine educator in that many activities are conducted at locations where the Internet is inaccessible and students may not want to bring computers.

Whatever approach is used, a poorly prepared handout detracts from learning as much as does a badly conducted session or an inadequate teacher. No matter how well prepared and presented the learning activity, students will feel frustrated if they must navigate a disorganized, error-ridden syllabus.

Simulations

Among the most thorough treatments of the history and perspectives of the use of simulation in medical education is offered by Gardner and Raemer, who describe the use of this educational tool in obstetrics and gynecology training. They point out that among all the techniques available for the transfer of medical skills and knowledge, “simulation is a practical and safe approach to the acquisition and maintenance of task-oriented and behavioral skills across the spectrum of medical specialties. It is a means to augment didactic instruction, providing an out-of-the-chair and hands-on experience in a safe environment without harming real patients.” The notion that nonhuman objects could be used to train medical practitioners is not new and is being used across many disciplines.6,56,68,74 As a model of complex skill training using a simulation-based mastery learning program to increase learner skills, Barsuk7 recently used simulated central venous catheter insertion to demonstrate improved performance that decreased complications related to central venous catheter insertions in actual patient care.

The incorporation of modern, computer-based technology across the spectrum of industries did not escape health care. Most medical schools and graduate medical education programs incorporate some form of simulation in their curricula.7,27 Computer-based simulation technology has evolved to the point of offering virtual world individual and team-based scenarios using preprogrammed patients to expand the breadth and depth of options available for medical education.57,64 Expectations for increased quality of medical training and the improved outcomes that result seem to contradict the decreased time allotted and increased resources required to conduct this training, as well as the associated expense. Training on virtual patients using interactive, computer-based clinical scenarios offers a potential solution11 (Figure 105-10).

Simulation technology is being used increasingly in medical training settings to enhance team training. As with any team-based vocation, medical teams that frequently practice their interactions are more effective and efficient. Teams that use simulation tools along with scenario-based role-play will benefit greatly. This is particularly useful in first responder and many types of hands-on wilderness medicine training courses. The learning and reinforcing of basic teamwork principles are greatly facilitated by using scenario- and simulation-based training. These include leadership, followership, situational awareness, closed loop communication, critical language, standardized responses, assertive communication, adaptive behaviors, workload management, and debriefing31,54 (Figure 105-11).

The use of simulation with computer-based mannequins and live patient role-play adds a dimension to skills-based training in wilderness medicine not available to more theoretical areas. Although this tool limits the quantity of information that can be covered and is resource intensive, it is a highly effective means to solidify learning and conduct reliable and valid assessments of hands-on skills. Except for the important teaching paradigms of austerity, limited treatment resources, and improvisation, its use in wilderness medicine is fundamentally no different than how it is employed in other areas of health care education.

Important factors to consider when planning training using patient simulation are the setting, the scene, acting, evaluation, and makeup (moulage).47 The setting can be either indoors or outdoors as long as the proper clues are available to the learners. Highly realistic indoor settings call for elaborate surroundings and are often unnecessary. The basic function is to allow learners to familiarize quickly with the details of the scenario and make treatment and resource allocation decisions based on that information. Outdoor settings add more realism and use fewer resources but are subject to limitations imposed by weather and terrain. Even though prehospital courses in wilderness medicine orient their curricula toward anticipating, recognizing, and managing clinical syndromes using limited, often improvised equipment, the use of prefabricated and prepositioned props may make the training more efficient and the assessments more reliable.

The ability of learners to mentally immerse themselves in experiences using simulations seems to be directly related to the quality of the learning experience.27 No matter the quality and high degree of fidelity of the simulation device used, the willingness of participants to “act the part” as though the situation were real for the duration of the training event facilitates the quality of their learning (Figure 105-12).

Managing the acting can be challenging. Much of what role-players will be asked to do will seem unnatural. Some will simply not have the personality or behavioral repertoire to make good role-players. This results in either overacting or underacting, both of which hinder learning and assessment. Thorough briefings about training goals and setting ground rules for role-players are crucial. Having role-players that are thoroughly familiar with the script ensures that training objectives are met and skills assessments remain reliable. Students within the group can be used for training and derive additional learning benefit from this experience. Outside role-players should generally be used as victims for skills testing. The variation in quality of role-players can be partly overcome by having experienced and thoroughly briefed faculty and examiners at each station.

When available, makeup devices enhance learning by adding a high degree of realism. Makeup may consist of inexpensive improvised items or costly, anatomically correct moulage kits designed specifically for this purpose. The overriding concern when improvising or selecting moulage is whether it enhances or detracts from achieving the learning objectives of the scenario. If it directly supports the clinical syndrome being portrayed, then it is a good choice. If it does not, then it may confuse learners by causing them to make faulty assumptions. This has the overall effect of incorrectly learning material and leads to unreliable and invalid assessments (Figure 105-13).

Time spent in developing a fair and valid assessment process using patient simulation will pay off. As previously mentioned, this is impacted by many factors, such as the quality and preparation of role-players and faculty, as well as environmental issues that are often beyond the control of the course director.

The notion of computer-simulated training dates back to the 1960s. Modern applications are taking the concept to a new level in the field of health care education. Patient simulation is particularly well suited for skills-oriented basic and advanced life support training in wilderness prehospital courses.45 This tool merges computer technology with fundamental behavior-based adult learning principles to deliver effective teaching. Students are both challenged and stimulated to high levels of performance. Information is delivered in a tangible, practical fashion with immediate reinforcement. Learners may repeat scenarios, make on-the-spot corrections of wrong decisions, and see immediate results. Simulation at this level is more efficient than both problem- and scenario-based teaching largely due to the high quality of feedback that learners receive as they observe the immediate consequences of their interventions.45

Life-sized mannequins are used that have complex analog to digital computer interfaces and run algorithm-based software designed to deliver a response to anything the learner does, including doing nothing. Software can be programmed to demonstrate any number of minor to life-threatening clinical presentations that are interpreted by the student as physiologic changes that would be expected in a real patient with a similar history and status. Interventions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intravenous fluid administration, injectable medications, and intubations can be made that, if done properly and in the correct sequence, will result in the expected clinical improvement.

An additional feature offered by this tool is that of assessment of learning. In relation to traditional forms of written testing, computer patient simulation using scenarios is one of the most effective learning assessment methods. To this already superb tool can be added computer-generated reports and video of the interaction that can be viewed individually or in groups to reinforce teaching points and make corrections.

Evaluation of Teaching

Assessment of the teaching process is an integral part of completing the education cycle. It is hard to imagine how any course could flourish without a mechanism to self-evaluate and make periodic adjustments. This is part of what educators are accountable for when promising to deliver a product. Organizations that track, report, and maintain standards for the awarding of CME and CEU credit require this step to ensure that the quality of health care instruction is maintained at a high level. Evaluation is often viewed negatively by teaching staff. However, if done properly, it can take on a positive quality as a means to provide feedback. All curricula should evolve in ways that are responsive to students’ needs. Formal self-evaluation requires a method to organize this process. The main purposes of evaluation are as follows:51

Course directors should look for correlations between results of course evaluations and academic testing. This requires well-constructed evaluation tools. Although critique of the course should have no impact on whether or not students graduate, it must be treated like any other assessment to yield meaningful results. Several issues must be addressed when designing or selecting an effective instrument.

Usefulness of the Results

Like any other assessment, the ideal evaluation is reliable, valid, acceptable, and inexpensive.51 A violation of any of these will decrease the usefulness of the instrument. A poorly designed or administered critique wastes valuable resources and time for both respondents and faculty. This lack of respect will transform the process into a meaningless exercise. So how does one ensure that the results will be useful? The most important aspect is the actual construction of the instrument itself (see later discussion). Next is to make students feel vested in the course so that thoughtful assessment has a purpose and comes naturally. This must be nurtured in the course design and should have already occurred before the critique forms are handed out on the last day. Attend to the principle of proximity. For lengthy courses, ensure that there is time scheduled and reminders given each day to fill out critique forms for each session. A short, overall evaluation of the course can be done at the end. Students may be in a hurry to depart after academic activities are over and evaluations are being completed. A common technique to ensure that each student completes an evaluation is to require that he or she turns in a form before receiving a graduation or training certificate.

Format of the Evaluation Instrument

Selection of the proper format of the evaluation is critical. An improperly designed instrument with poorly worded questions may lead to meaningless results or faulty assumptions that lead to inappropriate modification of course design. A good instrument respects students’ time. They will not fill it out properly if it is too lengthy or complicated. It should minimize potential for error and confusion by reducing the amount of work and thought that goes into filling out the form. Provide as much unique identifying course-related information for them as possible on the form. The fewer pages the better. One page is best. Instructions must be brief and clear.

Written commentary format gives immediate comprehensible feedback to the faculty that can be either positive or negative. However, it may be superficial and limited in scope. Comments may be difficult to translate into actionable information that leads to course improvements. Evaluations that use this method exclusively have limited reliability and validity.

The multiple-choice format facilitates tabulation and objective comparison. The choice of responses must be broad enough to avoid bias toward either end of the scale. In general, simple good-bad descriptors are less helpful than those that address the function and effectiveness of the item in question. Descriptive adjectives should be selected that match the component being evaluated. For example, adjectives describing helpfulness and effectiveness may be most appropriate when asking questions about class materials or procedures. A space for commentary should be provided after each question. Scaled forms on which the student must fill in a circle or cross off a number to rate the specific features of the course take less time to complete and are helpful in managing the results. A quick reminder about the nature of the item being rated may accompany these questions. Rating scales can be from 1 to 5 or 1 to 10 and may correspond to various forms of descriptors.

No matter what format is chosen, it is a good idea to leave room for several open-ended questions that address the most and least valuable portions of the course as well as what improvements the respondent recommends. Responses to these tend to be highly contextual based on the background and personality of the student. However, multiple responses from a single class that focus on the same issue or several that are similar across multiple courses may indicate need for change.

Program and Curriculum Development

The notion that teaching in health care should be organized and programmed continues to evolve. How this is best accomplished remains unsettled. The uniqueness of wilderness medicine presents challenges and affords educators ample opportunity to be innovative in curriculum design. This applies to short certification-oriented courses, embedded curricula within longer programs of instruction, or limited CME/CEU programs.

In its most basic form a curriculum is an expression of community values. In other words, if it is to remain viable, it should reflect the current and changing values of the community it serves. Because students will ultimately return to the community to practice, the community, made up of stakeholders, should have a say in what they are taught. What they are taught should be directly relevant to the needs of the community from which they come. This seems simple enough but is the underlying reason why curriculum design is often controversial in wilderness medicine. Who are the stakeholders? Apart from market dynamics, who gets to make the call about what should and should not be taught? To what standardizing body do we turn for guidance? In all of this, where is the evidence on which to base judgments and decisions?

Concepts and Models

Prideaux recently described a curriculum as “existing at three basic levels: what is planned for the students, what is delivered to the students, and what the students experience.” In practical application a curriculum should be easily communicated to learners and educators, should be open to critique and modification, and should be easily implemented. More specifically, it should contain four elements: content, teaching and learning strategies, assessment processes, and teaching evaluation methods. The process of curriculum design attempts to form these elements into a tangible, usable device.61

Several models of health care curriculum design have been proposed over the years. These have evolved indirectly based on changing needs, values, and expectations of society. The one that has emerged as being most effective and has the greatest applicability to wilderness medicine is based on identifying, addressing, and assessing desired outcomes. This is appropriately referred to as “outcomes-based education.” Although usually discussed in the context of clinical teaching settings such as medical schools and residencies, the focus on outcomes is germane to wilderness medicine. No matter how the details of a curriculum unfold in practice, keeping the focus on outcomes places the wilderness medicine learner at the center of the education cycle. The basic concept of this model requires that educators first decide what the students should know (outcomes), design a program of learning to allow them to achieve it, and then assess whether or not they achieved the desired results. The details of how educators make these determinations describe an elaborate and interesting process.

Numerous versions of curriculum design are in use throughout the United States and Europe. Many have been reported in the wilderness medicine literature.12,45,5860,76 Steve Donelan has written extensively on the subject and offers the most detailed guidance available.15,1923 Nearly all courses use a combination of techniques to deliver material to learners. A focus on outcomes is a common theme.

Steps in Designing a Curriculum

The success or failure of any educational experience goes far beyond a title. Simply using a wilderness medicine label may attract enthusiasts initially. However, failing to deliver a sound learning experience that is rooted in fundamental educational concepts, that leverages the most modern technology when applicable and practicable, and that is clinically useful will rapidly send would-be attendees looking elsewhere for ways to spend their valuable time and education dollars. The design of the curriculum lies at the heart of this issue. McGraw and Gluckman reported on the results of their efforts to bring wilderness medicine to undergraduate medical education at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. A postcourse survey indicated that a large number (40%) of respondents found the course to be the best experience they had undergone in medical school.49 As Steve Donelan24 indicated in his commentary on their report, medical schools may have much to learn from these nontraditional courses, given the strength of their curricula and overall course design, quality of teaching, and relevance of the clinical information contained therein.

All aspects of curriculum design should be well thought out before resources are allocated. The general sequence starts with identification of the desired outcomes, or what the students should be able to do (including a learning needs assessment), addresses specific content (topics to be taught), selects teaching methods, develops learning assessment instruments, and finally, constructs tools to evaluate the process. All of these have been addressed previously and are mentioned below.

Desired Outcomes

Outcomes are addressed on two levels: the overall course goals or objectives and specific learning objectives for each session or activity. As the name implies, course goals describe the overall purpose for students attending the course. This may include a job- or skill-related certification or simply advancement of their general fund of knowledge. It addresses what they should be able to do or know after completing the entire program. All activities related to the formal curriculum should contribute in some way to these goals. This is similar to a large corporation that does institution-level analysis of mission, vision, goals, and objectives. Any action resulting from this strategic planning that does not contribute in some way to the mission of the organization is at best distracting and possibly a hindrance. Individual learning objectives can be viewed in this context. Accomplishment of the course goals depends on them.

Two sources, or stakeholders, should be queried to determine outcomes at both levels. Potential learners may be asked using various methods (polling, focus groups, and questionnaires) what they think is important and what they would most like to learn. Organizations that hire or interface with potential graduates of the course may be asked for their input on what skills, knowledge, and qualities the graduates should possess. The goals and objectives should be formalized, written, and distributed to anyone involved with curriculum design. They serve as a compass to guide all planning and design efforts.

The set of general educational objectives for the WPHEC curriculum proposed in 1991 by the Wilderness Medical Society (summarized later) offers an example of how to organize course objectives for this type of program.76 A learning needs assessment of the intended audience allows these to be rewritten in a more active tense using appropriate verbs to make them suitable for use as outcomes in any setting. Courses designed to provide certification or registration would address this requirement as well in the course objectives.

Some wilderness medicine courses focus on specific environments such as dive, tropical, aerospace, or desert medicine. Course objectives for these should reflect the unique requirements of each and be tailored to the needs of the anticipated audience.

Planning for Continuing Medical Education

Educational experiences intended to assist practitioners at all levels of nearly all medical disciplines maintain currency, refresh eroded skills and knowledge, or add new skills and knowledge are vital to safety and viability across the health care industry. Despite the importance and use by all health care disciplines, there remains a relatively small body of evidence beyond tradition, anecdote, and expert opinion to support the use of any given educational technique or set of techniques over any another in the planning and delivery of CME.55 There are evidence-based guidelines produced by some specialty-oriented professional organizations based on the existing body of educational research. These attempt not only to elevate the effectiveness of CME but also to standardize training techniques within the discipline and inform the industry that has grown up to produce continuing education.50 The body of literature on which these guidelines are based is not large and reflects the tremendous difficulty inherent in studying education in a way that is based on outcomes and that allows for reliable cause-and-effect conclusions. It seems reasonable, however, to assert that continuing education for health care should adhere to fundamental principles of adult education already discussed. For example, augmenting a course based on a traditional lecture format by using multiple approaches to deliver information such as multimedia presentations or interactive, small-group, case-based discussion will enhance energy and improve learning. When practical to the setting, simulation is a preferable method to refresh, maintain, and learn new psychomotor skills.1,40,55

Development of programs designed to award credit for CME or CEU development follows the same basic steps with respect to curriculum content. There are challenges unique to this type of activity that deserve special mention. The venue (setting) is more likely to impact the program of instruction no matter if it is completely lecture-based or uses a mix of teaching styles. Learners at CME/CEU events are more apt to form judgments about value based on the perceived quality of what they received balanced against how much they paid. Participants expect adequate physical space, facilities, accommodations, and amenities.

Many participants seek recreational diversion in addition to the learning experience. This must be addressed not only in the logistic planning but in the schedule as well. Holding an event at an attractive location with lots of recreational opportunities and then cramming 50 hours of great training into 4 days will only frustrate CME/CEU learners and cause them to make difficult choices, including not to return the next time the event is offered.

The selection process for faculty is often limited by both budget and who is available to teach. Although convention holds that only the most highly proficient and credentialed faculty should be selected, reality often forces a different approach. The search should begin early, because good teachers are highly sought and have busy professional lives. Program chairs should attempt to obtain a commitment as early as possible and make a viable contingency plan for those that have to cancel or simply do not respond. The design of the program of instruction is closely linked to the selection of faculty for CME/CEU events. The notoriety of teachers often drives the selection of their area of expertise as a subject in the curriculum. This makes development of a good contingency plan all the more important and difficult when high-profile speakers have to cancel. Learners are likely committed to that topic and speaker and may feel slighted when it is not delivered or a substitute is asked to step in.

After a program of instruction (curriculum) is set and faculty are chosen, course materials must be developed. Program chairs have two basic options to get this accomplished. They may establish the curriculum early, including learning objectives, and then ask faculty to develop and submit original material. This requires that faculty be given specific guidelines about how to prepare the materials. This includes format and length. Standardization of presentation materials provides a professional appearance to the program that helps achieve buy-in from participants. Expertise, responsiveness, and quality of product vary greatly, so program chairs are wise to begin this process a year in advance. Another method is to provide prepared materials to the speakers in advance. They may or may not be allowed to make modifications depending on the desires of the program chair. This method has the advantage of being centrally controlled, dependable, and flexible when faculty members cancel. However, the workload of the program chair is obviously increased because all materials must be developed, reviewed for accuracy and currency, printed, and collated.

Perhaps the most difficult part of conducting CME/CEU events is managing the administrative, business, and marketing tasks that must be accomplished. These include contracting for venues, speakers, printers, training support, and materials. Development of marketing tools such as flyers, brochures, and websites requires skill with graphic design and layout and is usually beyond the expertise of most program chairs. A poorly designed brochure can kill an otherwise high-quality event. The application for and purchase of CME/CEU credit as well as the interface with the awarding organizations pose a significant workload challenge. Course materials, including certificates, evaluation forms, syllabus, handouts, and administrative guides, must all be coordinated and produced. It is recommended that professional assistance be sought for these critical tasks at least a year in advance.

Using an organized approach to program and curriculum design that directly addresses objectives and follows the basic convention discussed here will lead to successful outcomes no matter what the level of learner or type of activity.

References

1 Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Mission, http://www.accme.org/index.cfm/fa/about.home/about.cfm.

2 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcome Project, http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/.

3 Auerbach P. How to write a good and interesting manuscript [editorial]. J Wilderness Med. 1993;4:1.

4 Auerbach P. Continuing medical education: A wilderness of its own [editorial]. J Wilderness Med. 1994;5:248.

5 Barrows H, Tamblyn R. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer; 1980.

6 Barsuk J. Mastery learning of temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion by nephrology fellows using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:70.

7 Barsuk J. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2697.

8 Brookfield S. The skillful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990.

9 Cate O, Snell L, Mann K, et al. Orienting teaching toward the learning environment. Acad Med. 2004;79:219.

10 Continuing education for health professionals. Writing objectives, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. http://www.usuhs.mil/che/write_objective.htm.

11 Cook D. Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ. 2009;43:303.

12 Cordes D, Rea D, Gerhauser R. Wilderness medicine: A clinical introduction for medical students. J Wilderness Med. 1992;3:367.

13 Davidson M. The 360 degrees evaluation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2007;24:65.

14 Donelan S. Letter to the editor. J Wilderness Med. 1991;2:369.

15 Donelan S. Teaching emergency care skills. Wilderness Environ Med. 1999;10:125.

16 Donelan S. Testing emergency care skills. Wilderness Environ Med. 1999;10:261.

17 Donelan S. Classroom and reality: Lessons from real emergencies. Wilderness Environ Med. 2000;11:122.

18 Donelan S. Staging simulated accidents. Wilderness Environ Med. 2000;11:52.

19 Donelan S. Teaching patient assessment. Wilderness Environ Med. 2000;11:209.

20 Donelan S. Evaluating and improving your class. Wilderness Environ Med. 2001;12:134.

21 Donelan S. How to use textbooks, handouts, and visual aids. Wilderness Environ Med. 2001;12:42.

22 Donelan S. Explanation as a teaching technique. Wilderness Environ Med. 2003;14:194.

23 Donelan S. Mountaineering and mountain rescue. Wilderness Environ Med. 2004;15:44.

24 Donelan S. An introduction to the perceived benefits of a medical school course in wilderness medicine. Wilderness Environ Med. 2005;16:105.

25 Downer A, Pace A: Application of learning theory to health education. University of Washington Master of Public Health EDP faculty lecture handout; 2001-2002 academic year.

26 Forsyth D. Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, Calif: Brooks-Cole; 1990.

27 Gardner R. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008;35:97.

28 Goldstein R, Zuckerman B. A perspective on 360-degree evaluations. J Pediatr. 2010;156:1.

29 Hay P, Katsikitis M. The expert in problem-based and case-based learning: Necessary or not? Med Educ. 2001;35:22.

30 Houghton W. The power of scenario. Wilderness Environ Med. 1997;8:127.

31 Hunt E. Simulation: Translation to improved team performance. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:301.

32 Hutchinson L. Educational environment. BMJ. 2003;326:810.

33 Irby D. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333.

34 Irby D, Rakestraw P. Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine. J Med Educ. 1981;56:181.

35 Jaques D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Teaching small groups. BMJ. 2003;326:492.

36 Johnson D, Johnson F. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1991.

37 Kash K. ACGME competencies in neurology: Web-based objective simulated computerized clinical encounters. Neurology. 2009;72:893.

38 Kaufman D. Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326:213.

39 Knowles M. Androgogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.

40 Kokemueller P. Trends and developments in continuing medical education. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40:1331.

41 Kolb D. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Old Tappan, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

42 Kromann C. The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ. 2009;43:21.

43 Krueger P, Neutens J, Bienstock J, et al. To the point: Reviews in medical education teaching techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:408.

44 Lawry G, Schuldt S, Kreiter C, et al. Teaching a screening musculoskeletal examination: A randomized, controlled trial of different instructional methods. Acad Med. 1999;74:199.

45 Macias D, Rogers K, Alcock J. Development of a wilderness and travel medicine rotation in an academic setting. Wilderness Environ Med. 2004;15:136.

46 Mager R. Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction, ed 3. Atlanta: The Center for Effective Performance; 1997.

47 Marple B. Competency-based resident education. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40:1215.

48 Maslow A. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row; 1954.

49 McGraw D, Gluckman SJ. The perceived benefits of a medical school course in wilderness medicine. Wilderness Environ Med. 2005;16:106.

50 Moores L, Dellert E, Baumann M, et al. Executive summary: Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest. 2009;135:1s.

51 Morrison J. Evaluation. BMJ. 2003;326:385.

52 Nelson M. Wilderness medicine education [editorial]. J Wilderness Med. 1992;3:346.

53 Nikendei C. Integration of role-playing into technical skills training: A randomized controlled trial. Med Teach. 2007;29:956.

54 Nishisaki A. Does simulation improve patient safety? Self-efficacy, competence, operational performance, and patient safety. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:225.

55 Norman G. The American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines for continuing medical education interventions. Chest. 2009;135:834.

56 Overstreet M. The use of simulation technology in the education of nursing students. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;43:593.

57 Parvoti D. Virtual worlds and team training. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:321.

58 Pattinson K, Matthews S. Climbing the education mountain: Designing the new diploma in mountain medicine for the United Kingdom. Wilderness Environ Med. 2004;15:44.

59 Peters P. Practical aspects in mountain medicine education. Wilderness Environ Med. 2000;11:262.

60 Peterson E, Snider W, Fahrenwald R. A model for wilderness medicine education in a family practice residency. Wilderness Environ Med. 2002;13:266.

61 Prideaux D. Curriculum design. BMJ. 2003;326:268.

62 Reed D. What is an hour-lecture worth? Am J Surg. 2008;195:379.

63 Schweinfurth J. Interactive instruction in otolaryngology resident education. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40:1203.

64 Small S. Simulation applications for human factors and systems evaluation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:237.

65 Smee S. Skills based assessment. BMJ. 2003;326:703.

66 Steele D, Medder J, Turner P. A comparison of learning outcomes and attitudes in student- versus faculty-led problem-based learning: An experimental study. Med Educ. 2000;34:23.

67 Stern D, Williams B, Gill A, et al. Is there a relationship between attending physicians’ and residents’ teaching skills and students’ examination scores? Acad Med. 2000;75:1144.

68 Sweet R. Simulation and computer-animated devices: The new minimally invasive skills training paradigm. Urol Clin N Am. 2008;35:519.

69 Tuckman B. Developmental sequence of small groups. Psychol Bull. 1965;63:384.

70 Tuckman B, Jenson M. Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational. Studies. 1977;2:419.

71 Vella J. Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1994.

72 Vella J. How do they know they know?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

73 Vella J. Training through dialogue: Promoting effective learning and change with adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

74 Weiner E. Supporting the integration of technology into contemporary nursing education. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;43:497.

75 Whitman N. The physician as teacher, ed 2. Salt Lake City, Utah: Whitman Associates; 1997.

76 Wilderness Medical Society Pre-hospital Committee. Wilderness pre-hospital emergency care curriculum. J Wilderness Med. 1991;2:80.

77 Wood D. Problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:328.

APPENDIX A Wilderness Medicine Educational Organizations, Resources, and Programs

A variety of educational and certification programs are available for individuals who seek knowledge and training in wilderness medicine. Courses and certification programs exist for laypeople, first responders, physicians, and allied health professionals in first aid, search and rescue, and other advanced topics. Certification programs for basic and advanced wilderness skills are often modeled after similar programs for emergency medical technicians (EMTs), as well as after basic and advanced life support training courses. Professional societies have helped to define the academic standards for these programs, both in the United States and abroad, and promote research and organize continuing medical education (CME) events. Electives for medical students and residents have become popular, as has postresidency fellowship training through programs that are not approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The list of organizations offering teaching and training resources is long and evolving; fortunately, most have a well-developed Internet presence.

Professional Societies

A number of U.S. and international societies exist that have guided establishment of academic standards in wilderness medicine education (Boxes 105-8 and 105-9). These organizations typically sponsor CME events through large, sometimes international, meetings to further education, research, and international cooperation and sharing of knowledge. The Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) and the International Society for Mountain Medicine (ISMM) both sponsor educational activities and publish their own peer-reviewed journals (Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, High Altitude Medicine and Biology). The WMS, for example, hosts CME events and offers fellowship training to members through its Academy of Wilderness Medicine. Several professional societies, including the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine possess wilderness medicine interest groups or chapters. Other organizations, such as the Divers Alert Network or the National Ski Patrol, focus on specific content areas.

BOX 105-8 United States–Based Professional Societies

Aerospace Medical Association http://www.asma.org
American Alpine Club http://www.americanalpineclub.org
American College of Emergency Physicians (Wilderness Medicine Chapter) http://www.acep.org
Appalachian Center for Wilderness Medicine http://www.appwildmed.org
Divers Alert Network (DAN) http://www.diversalertnetwork.org
Institute for Altitude Medicine http://www.altitudemedicine.org
International Society for Mountain Medicine http://www.ismmed.org
International Society of Travel Medicine http://www.istm.org
Mountain Rescue Association (MRA) http://www.mra.org
National Association for Search and Rescue (NASAR) http://www.nasar.org
National Ski Patrol http://www.nsp.org
Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (Wilderness Medicine Interest Group) http://www.saem.org
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society http://www.uhms.org
Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) http://www.wms.org

BOX 105-9 International Professional Societies

Argentine Mountain Medicine Society http://www.samm.org.ar (Spanish)
Austrian Society for Mountain and High Altitude Medicine http://www.alpinmedizin.org (German)
German Society for Mountain and Expedition Medicine http://www.bexmed.de (German)
Himalayan Rescue Association of Nepal http://www.himalayanrescue.org
International Commission for Alpine Rescue (ICAR) http://www.ikar-cisa.org
International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation (UIAA) http://www.theuiaa.org
Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal http://www.mmsn.org.np
Swiss Mountain Medicine Society http://www.mountainmedicine.ch (German)

Opportunities for Medical Students and Physicians

Medical Students

Opportunities for medical student education have increased tremendously. Although students are free to pursue WFA and WFR courses as described later, many seek formal electives for educational credit through medical schools. These electives continue to grow, typically require a 2- to 4-week commitment in the third or fourth year, and may result in WFR or other certification. The majority of these experiences incorporate classroom instruction with some form of outdoor experience with problem- or case-based learning. Several of these electives are based in urban locations and transition to backcountry or resource-poor settings for experience-based teaching and simulation. The WMS has a well-established month-long course in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in association with the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. In addition, the WMS sponsors student interest groups to help foster educational activities and events. Although students are free to attend CME events in wilderness medicine, several conferences exist specifically for medical students. Box 105-10 lists some well-established programs with links to their websites.

BOX 105-10 Medical Student Electives

Cornell University Medical College http://www.nypemergency.org
Johns Hopkins University http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/som/wildernessmedicine/
Madigan Army Medical Center http://www.fieldmedicine.net
Medcor at Yellowstone National Park http://www.medcor.com/onsite/SpecialOperations_YellowstonePark.asp
Medical Clinic of Big Sky http://www.docsky.us
NOLS Medical Student Course, HAEMR http://www.nols.edu/wmi/courses/medicineinthewild.shtml
Medical Wilderness Adventure Race http://www.medwar.org
University of California San Francisco-Fresno http://www.fresno.ucsf.edu/em/medical_students.htm#wilderness
University of Massachusetts Medical School http://www.umassmed.edu/wildmeded.aspx
University of Nebraska School of Medicine http://www.gmrsltd.com/2008WildernessExpeditionMedicine2.html
University of Nevada http://www.lasvegasemr.com/wilderness/
University of New Mexico http://www.hsc.unm.edu/emermed/W_Med/wilderness_med_72009.shtml
University of South Carolina http://www.scwildernessmed.com
University of Utah http://www.awlsmedstudents.org/studentelective.html
University of Virginia http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/medtox/education/Wilderness/home.cfm
Wilderness Medical Associates International http://www.wildmed.ca/w_elective.html
Wilderness Medical Society Elective http://www.wms.org/education/elective.asp
Wilderness Medicine in Alaska http://www.adirondoc.com

HAEMR, Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency; NOLS, National Outdoor Leadership School.

Residents

Several organizations offer elective time to residents, primarily in family and emergency medicine (Box 105-11). These electives incorporate a variety of EMS, search and rescue training, and international experiences and typically require a 2- to 4-week commitment. Many elective experiences integrate learners from all disciplines and levels of medical education.

BOX 105-11 Resident Electives

Grand Canyon Clinic http://www.nps.org/grca
Grand Teton National Park http://www.wildmedconsulting.com
Madigan Army Medical Center http://www.fieldmedicine.net
Medical Clinic of Big Sky http://www.docsky.us
Stanford University http://emed.Stanford.edu/fellowships/wilderness.html
Telluride Medical Center, Institute for Altitude Medicine http://www.telluridemedicalcenter.org
University of California San Francisco-Fresno http://www.fresno.ucsf.edu/em/wilderness.html
University of Virginia http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/medtox/education/Wilderness/home.cfm

Postgraduate Training

Non-ACGME fellowships exist for graduates of emergency medicine residencies (Box 105-12). These fellowships typically involve a mixture of traditional emergency medicine clinical work with nonclinical time devoted to wilderness training. The WMS offers Fellowship of the Academy of Wilderness Medicine (FAWM) certification for physicians and members. FAWM candidates obtain credits through attending CME events and documenting field experience. Physicians can also pursue an International Diploma of Mountain Medicine certified by the Union Internationale des Associations d’Alpinisme (UIAA), Internationale Kommission für Alpines Rettungswesen (IKAR), and ISMM.

BOX 105-12 Fellowship and Training Opportunities for Physicians

International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation (UIAA) http://www.theuiaa.org/mountain_medicine.html
Loma Linda University School of Medicine http://www.lomalindahealth.org/medical-center/our-services/emergency
Massachusetts General Hospital http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/education/fellowship.aspx?id=94#
Stanford University Medical Center http://www.emed.standford.edu/fellowships/wilderness.html
University of California San Francisco-Fresno http://www.fresno.ucsf.edu/em
University of Utah http://www.utahhealthsciences.net/pageview.aspx?id=17053
Wilderness Medical Society Academy of Wilderness Medicine http://www.wms.org/fawm

Certification Programs

Wilderness medicine certification programs exist in a variety of forms for a diverse audience. Laypeople, first responders, physicians, allied health professionals, and others may find courses for their particular skill set and interest. No national or international governing body enforces standards for these certification programs. However, there are a number of widely recognized curricula, such as the National Practice Guidelines for Wilderness Emergency Care published by the Wilderness Medical Society. Most of these certifications rely heavily on skills-based testing and mirror more traditional training programs such as Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Certifications are typically valid for 2 to 3 years with a trend toward 2 years. Some have argued for development of standardized, national curricula for wilderness medicine programs. However, the proprietary nature of curricula and certifications may be an impediment to this process. Box 105-13 lists certification programs and Box 105-14 lists some of the major organizations that provide training.

BOX 105-13 Certification Types

  Audience Average Time of Instruction
Wilderness First Aid (WFA) Open 16-24 hours
Basic Wilderness Life Support (BWLS) Open 16 hours
Introduction to Search and Rescue (ISAR) Open 16 hours
Advanced Search and Rescue (ADSAR) Open 19 hours
Wilderness Advanced First Aid (WAFA) Open 36 hours
Advanced Wilderness First Aid (AWFA) Open 48 hours
Wilderness First Responder (WFR) Open 64-80 hours
Wilderness Emergency Medical Technician (WEMT) EMTs 170+ hours
Advanced Wilderness Life Support (AWLS) Medical professionals 36 hours
Wilderness Advanced Life Support (WALS) Medical professionals 36 hours
Remote Medicine for the Advanced Providers (RMAP) Medical professionals 44 hours
Diploma in Mountain Medicine (DiMM) Medical professionals 100 hours
Fellowship of the Academy of Wilderness Medicine (FAWM) WMS members 100 credit hours

EMT, Emergency medical technician; WMS, Wilderness Medical Society.

BOX 105-14 Educational Organizations

Adirondack Wilderness Medicine http://www.adkwildmed.com
Advanced Wilderness Life Support http://www.awls.org
Aeire Backcountry Medicine http://www.aeriemedicine.com
CDS Outdoor School http://www.cdsoutdoor.org/index.php
Center for Wilderness Safety (CWS) http://www.wildsafe.com
Desert Mountain Medicine http://www.desertmountainmedicine.com/home/index.php
Expedition Medicine http://www.expeditionmedicine.co.uk
Expedmed http://www.expedmed.org
First Lead http://www.firstlead.com
Mountain and Marine Medicine http://www.mmmedicine.com
National Outdoor Leadership School-Wilderness Medicine Institute NOLS-WMI http://www.nols.edu/wmi
Outward Bound http://www.outwardbound.org/index.cfm/do/exp.index
Remote Medical International http://www.remotemedical.com
Sirius Wilderness Medicine http://www.siriusmed.com
Slipstream http://www.wildernessfirstaid.ca
Stonehearth Open Learning Opportunity (SOLO) http://www.soloschools.com
The Wilderness Medicine Training Center http://www.wildmedcenter.com/home.html
University of Utah http://www.health.utah.edu/healthpromotion/cep/classes/wildernessMed.html
Wilderness Emergency Care http://www.wildernessemergencycare.com
Wilderness EMS Institute http://www.wemsi.org
Wilderness First Aid http://www.wfa.net
Wilderness Medical Associates http://www.wildmed.com
Wilderness Medicine http://www.wilderness-medicine.com
Wilderness Medicine of Utah http://www.wmutah.org
Wilderness Medicine Outfitters http://www.wildernessmedicine.com

The WFA certification typically requires 16 to 24 hours of instruction and emphasizes patient evaluation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and topics specific to wilderness settings, such as environmental injuries and patient transport. WFR certification typically requires 80 hours of instruction, expanding on the WFA curriculum. Other courses, such as wilderness EMT (WEMT) and advanced wilderness life support, provide medical professionals with a more in-depth educational experience. WEMT expands on traditional EMT-B certification to include instruction on extended patient care and rescue techniques specific to wilderness and remote settings.