What Is the Best Treatment for Open Fractures?

Published on 11/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1398 times

Chapter 43 What Is the Best Treatment for Open Fractures?

A fracture is considered open if the bone or the fracture hematoma communicates with the outside environment. These injuries often occur in conjunction with high-energy trauma. It is imperative not be distracted by the potentially gross injury and initiate an Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol. Stabilization of the patient can prevent secondary injury from hypoxia, hypothermia, and reduced tissue perfusion. The treatment of open fractures is a multifactorial and longitudinal endeavor. As with most orthopaedic algorithms the evidence for each step of treatment has a differing level of supporting literature. An exhaustive discussion of each anatomic location and grade of open fracture is neither practical nor supported in the literature. Most studies group all open fractures together or concentrate on tibia fractures when assessing different treatment protocols. Tibias are among the most common location of open fractures, as well as the ones plagued with the highest rates of infection and nonunion. With this in mind most of the treatment recommendations for the tibia can be considered as worst-case scenario for other fractures regardless of their location. Preservation of blood supply is of paramount importance in the treatment of any fracture. This is what allows fracture healing and prevents infection.

OPTIONS

After appropriate ATLS management of the patient, the basic principles of open fracture management include reduction of the fracture, application of a wound dressing and splinting of the involved extremity.

A careful neurological and vascular assessment should be completed and documented. A photograph of the open injury prior to dressing and splint application reduce repeated exposures of the open wound by multiple examiners leading to potential contamination, as a large number of infections are nosocomial.1 Rapid transportation to the nearest trauma center may reduce the overall rate of long term complications, especially in grade III B open fractures requiring specialty care from orthopaedic and plastic surgeons.2 Tetanus status must be established early in the course of treatment. Tetanus toxoid should be administered if the patient’s immune status is uncertain or the last booster was more than 10 years previous. The administration of human tetanus immune globulin will depend on the patient’s injury and immunization status.

Subsequent issues that must be considered include: timing of surgical intervention, the type and duration of antibiotic treatment, what type of irrigation fluid should be used during debridement, how the fracture should be stabilized, and when definitive soft tissue closure should be undertaken. Open fractures are associated with a high rate of nonunion and infection. Ancillary techniques such as bone grafting and various forms of bone stimulation have been tried to minimize the risk of nonunion. The purpose of this chapter is to review the evidence regarding these issues to help guide clinicians and to outline areas where further study is required.

EVIDENCE

Timing of Surgical Intervention

Open fractures have traditionally been considered orthopaedic emergencies, however, there is some evidence that operative treatment within six hours of injury versus treatment after six hours has no effect on ultimate infection rates.11 Definitive guidelines are not yet established for all open fractures. It is known that the location and grade of injury has a significant bearing on complication rates.12 As the severity of the fracture increases so does the infection rate. With the tibial location of the open fracture the complication rate is highest. Current evidence with regards to delayed initial treatment is Level II.

Quality radiographs are important to determine the extent of injury and to plan both the temporary and definitive fracture management.

Type and Duration of Antibiotic Administration

Prophylactic antibiotics play a key role in the prevention of one of the most dreaded complications of open fractures; that of infection.3 It is well established that antibiotics reduce the risk of infection.4 Numerous studies have looked at antibiotic selection and duration. There is evidence that when infection does become established the organism is usually one that is resistant to the original antibiotic chosen.1,5

Protocols for antibiotic selection are based upon the grade of open fracture and the degree of contamination. Although the open fracture grading system has poor interobserver reliability it still provides guidelines for treatment.6 There are numerous randomized control trials studying different antibiotic protocols and their conclusions are all very similar. The use of a broad spectrum antibiotic, such as cefazolin, or the use of clindamycin or cloxacillin has been proven to reduce infection rates in grade I and grade II open fractures up to seven fold.7,8, 9 In grade III fractures, additional coverage is needed for gram-negative organisms with an aminoglycocide or fluoroquinolone.8 Gross contamination or “farm injuries” necessitate the addition of clostidial coverage and this usually means adding penicillin or metronidazole. Once daily high dose gentamicin (5-6 mg/kg) has been proven to be as effective as conventional divided dosing.10 In severe open wounds the use of an antibiotic bead pouch has been shown to reduce infection rates.20,21 Gentamicin beads are available commercially or tobramycin beads can be made by hand. Add 1.2 grams of powdered tobramycin to each package of cement. Round beads of 5 to fifteen millimeters are formed, strung on a wire, and placed in the open wound. The wound is sealed over with an adhesive, impermeable film such as Opsite or Ioban until the second debridement in 48 to 72 hours.

Irrigation Fluid during Debridement

Once the patient has been stabilized, the extremity reduced and splinted, and antibiotics and tetanus status addressed, definitive wound and possibly definitive fracture management should occur.

With the patient under anaesthetic the extremity is carefully exposed and a wound scrub is generally recommended to remove gross debris prior to preparation and draping of the fracture. Maintaining control of both sides of the fracture is imperative throughout the process. A tourniquet is applied but used only if absolutely necessary (level V). One of the most important steps in the optimization of outcomes is a meticulous layer-by-layer debridement of the open wound. An extensile exposure should be used taking care to minimize further soft tissue injury. Skin resection should be limited, knowing that questionable integument can be resected at the time of secondary debridement. Fat and fascia are generally expendable and poorly vascular. Muscle viability is evaluated along the lines of consistency, contractility, color, and capillary perfusion (4 C’s). Bone ends are delivered into the wound and cleaned and all non-viable bone is resected. Retained devascularized bone in the wound, even as a structural piece, can lead to a fifty percent increase in infection rates.13 Fasciotomies may be required in open fractures.

Throughout and following the surgical debridement six to twelve litres of warm isotonic irrigation should be run through the wound. The use of detergents such as castile soap as well as antibiotic solutions such as bacitracin has been studied. One large Level I prospective study concluded that neither fluid affected fracture healing or infection rates but the antibiotic solution cases had an increased rate of wound healing problems.14 Lavage fluid should be delivered by open gravity flow cystoscopy tubing or with low pressure pulsed lavage. High-pressure lavage has been shown to cause damage to bone.15 There is at least one well-designed in-vitro study showing increased effectiveness of 1% liquid soap in removing adherent bacteria from bone and preservation of osteoblast activity when applied with low-pressure lavage.16

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Although open fractures are relatively common there are still some gray areas in terms of definitive guidelines. Areas for further evaluation include timing of initial surgery, duration of antibiotics, type of irrigation fluid, and stimulants to bone healing such as ultrasound or bone morphogenic proteins.

Grade A Grade B Grade B Grade B Grade B   Grade C Grade C Grade C    

REFERENCES

1 Carsenti-Etesse H, Doyon F, Desplaces N, et al. Epidemiology of bacterial infection during management of open leg fractures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:315-323.

2 Naique SB, Pearse M, Nanchahal J. Management of severe open tibial fractures. The need for combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical treatment in specialist centres. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:351-357.

3 Braun R, Enzler MA, Rittmann WW. A double-blind clinical trial of prophylactic cloxacillin in open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1:12-17.

4 Gosselin RA, Roberts I, Gillespie WJ. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.; 1; 2004; CD003764.

5 Benson DR, Riggins RS, Lawrence RM, et al. Treatment of open fractures: A prospective study. J Trauma. 1983;23:25-30.

6 Brumback RJ, Jones AL. Interobserver agreement in classification of open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1162-1166.

7 Patzakis MJ, Bains RS, Lee J, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing single-agent antibiotic therapy, ciprofloxacin, to combination antibiotic therapy in open fracture wounds. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:529-533.

8 Vasenius J, Tulikoura I, Vainionpaa S, Rokkanen P. Clindamycin versus cloxacillin in the treatment of 240 open fractures. A randomized prospective study. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1998;87:224-228.

9 Patzakis MJ, Harvey JPJr, Ivler D. The role of antibiotics in the management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:532-541.

10 Sorger JI, Kirk PG, Ruhnke CJ, et al. Once daily, high dose versus divided, low dose gentamicin for open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;366:197-204.

11 Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Zenios M, et al. Early versus delayed surgical treatment of open tibial fractures: Effect on the rates of infection and need of secondary surgical procedures to promote bone union. J Injury. 2005;36:656-661.

12 Harley BJ, Beaupre LA, Jones CA. The effect of time to definitive treatment on the rate of non-union and infection in open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:484-490.

13 Edward CC, Simmons SC, Browner BD, et al. Severe open tibial fractures: Results treating 202 injuries with external fixation. Clin Orthop. 1988;230:98-115.

14 Anglen JO. Comparison of soap and antibiotic solutions for irrigation of lower-limb open fracture wounds. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1415-1422.

15 Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH, Adili A, et al. High and low pressure lavage of contaminated tibial fractures: An in vitro study of bacterial adherence and bone damage. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:526-533.

16 Bhandari M, Adili A, Schemitsch EH. The efficacy of low-pressure lavage with different irrigating solutions to remove adherent bacteria from bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:412-419.

17 Dervin GF. Skeletal fixation of grade IIIB tibial fractures. The potential of metaanalysis. J Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332:10-15.

18 Keating JF, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, et al. Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for open fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:334-341.

19 Tornetta P, Bergman M, Watnik N, et al. Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. A prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:13-19.

20 Bach AW, Hansen STJr. Plates versus external fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures. A randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:89-94.

21 Ostermann PA, Seligson D, Henry SL. Local antibiotic therapy for severe open fractures: A review of 1085 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:93-97.

22 Moehring HD, Gravel C, Chapman MW, Olson SA. Comparison of antibiotic beads and intravenous antibiotics in open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;372:254-261.

23 Dellinger EP, Caplan ES, Weaver LD, et al. Duration of preventive antibiotic administration for open extremity fractures. Arch Surg. 1988;123:333-339.

24 Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconst Surg. 1986;78:285-292.

25 Johnson KD, Bone LB, Scheinberg R. Severe open tibial fractures: A study protocol. J Orthop Trauma. 1988;2:175-180.

26 Govender S, Csimma C, Genant HK, et al. Evaluation in Surgery for Tibial Trauma Study: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: A prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:2123-2134.

27 Emami A, Petren-Mallmin M, Larsson S. No effect of low-intensity ultrasound on healing time of intramedullary fixed tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:252-257.

28 Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:26-34.