What is manic depression (bipolar disorder)?

Published on 24/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Psychiatry

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1608 times

1 What is manic depression (bipolar disorder)?

1.2 What is bipolar affective disorder?

Psychiatrists may appear to be always changing the names of the illnesses that they treat but this is not always done just to confuse the innocent! Manic depression is a term that has been used for more than a century to cover psychiatric illnesses with the fundamental symptom of a mood change. Fifty years ago the term would have been used widely to cover not only those patients who had manic episodes but also to include those who only experienced severe depression. In the 1960s it became apparent that there are major differences between those patients that experience mania and those that only suffer from depression. The differences are particularly in the course and the family history of the two types of mood illness. However, the considerable overlap has always been recognised. In order to indicate the separation, two new terms were adopted: unipolar and bipolar–unipolar depression for those patients that only experience depression and bipolar affective disorder for those that experience mania (and usually also depression). It would make logical sense to also have a unipolar mania category but in fact the unipolar manics are so similar to the bipolars that this term has not been popular (see Q 1.13).

Manic depression is an unusual illness in that a number of people have a bipolar illness that is currently undiagnosed because so far they have only suffered from depression. Even though the illness might have started with depression in the teenage years it is only when mania appears in the twenties that the diagnosis can be made. The illness affects both genders in essentially the same way.

The terms bipolar disorder and manic depression are now commonly used to describe the same illness and this book will follow that practice.

1.3 What do you call recurrent depression with hypomania?

The dividing line between mania and hypomania is not easy to demarcate (see Q 1.7); however it is worthwhile making this distinction because it affects decisions about treatment (Fig. 1.1). For this reason a different name is given to depression with mania–bipolar I–in contrast to depression with hypomania–bipolar II. There have been attempts to define bipolar III and IV based on family history and the effect of antidepressants but these have not really caught on.

image

Fig. 1.1 Prevalence of manic depression.

(Reprinted from Clin Appr Bipolar Disord 2002;1:10-14 by permission of Cambridge Medical Publications.)

1.4 What are the symptoms of mania?

The following example of a manic woman illustrates the range of symptoms and behaviours characteristic of mania (see also Box 1.1).

image Mood: In order to make a diagnosis of mania there must be a change in mood. This is usually elevated and she feels elated, ‘great’, ‘fantastic’. Extreme terms are used to describe a state that few of us reach. She may well be feeling ‘better than ever’, and in an exciting and unique way ‘connected with the whole world’. It is common to have never had such a good feeling in the whole of her life. One of the major problems later can be that she doesn’t feel that this is an experience that she would like to avoid; in fact she feels just the opposite because it is a feeling that one would want to seek out. The closest comparison is to feelings that a great success or achievement (or winning the lottery) can produce or the high that comes from drugs such as cocaine. The elation is often infectious and others can (at first at least) feel more cheerful in her presence and find a smile on their face. She looks happy but in an active, excited way rather than displaying a calm peaceful serenity.

However, not uncommonly it is irritability rather than elation that is felt and apparent to others. She can’t tolerate any disagreement but finds arguments everywhere, as her plans are being thwarted by others who see how unrealistic they are.

image Speech: She will talk non-stop and be difficult to interrupt. Staying quiet becomes impossible and dialogue is not needed–monologue is fine. In fact she does not even need an audience: you can see her wandering about, chatting away. Talking may not be enough–singing, shouting and laughter all form part of expressing her joy to the world.

Flight of ideas is the classic form of speech in mania (Box 1.2). Flight indicates the way ideas flow from one to another. The connections within the speech are usually apparent, in contrast to the thought disorder of schizophrenia which is much more obscure. But connections are too free and frequent so that distractions in what she sees or hears send her off on a new track. Alternatively, internal connections or personal memories may suddenly intervene. Playing with language is common as punning or rhyming takes over the flow for a while. The digressions mean that the goals of speech are quickly lost and so little is achieved in any conversation.

1.5 What psychotic symptoms accompany mania?

Psychosis is usually only found in the more extreme states of mania when the other symptoms are prominent. Psychosis refers to distortions of reality up to the point of losing contact with reality. The usual way to recognise psychosis is by the presence of delusions and hallucinations. However, sometimes activity is so bizarre (e.g. someone charging round a building site pretending to do battle training) that it is clear that reality testing is poor.

In mania, delusions are more common than hallucinations; both usually have a grandiose flavour and often come together. It can be difficult to tell when grandiose ideas tip over into delusions. When does thinking you are a good musician become so extreme an idea that it is delusional? The border is when the idea is fixed and is not retracted through logical argument. Some grandiose ideas are so eccentric that they are obviously delusional (e.g. the man claiming to be the Martian ambassador) and don’t need testing by argument. Challenging grandiose delusions can easily bring out irritability, if you are not just simply dismissed.

Paranoid ideas are the other type of delusion that is commonly seen in manic states. However, it can be difficult to tell when patients’ frustration with others’ lack of enthusiasm for their projects turns to paranoia. Paranoia always has a grandiose edge to it: ‘Why on earth would the CIA be interested in following you?’ Sometimes the mixture is more interesting–for example the man who has to leave the hospital as he is the only one who can tackle the drug traffickers who are in turn out to kill him. But remember paranoid ideas are common in a wide variety of psychiatric disorders (including confusional states) and are certainly not diagnostic of mania.

Hallucinations are most commonly auditory and usually second person (‘You’re the greatest’), rather than third person (‘Look at him, he’s so handsome’) which is more characteristic of schizophrenia. However, just because certain types of hallucination are present you should not dismiss the diagnosis of mania: so-called ‘first rank symptoms of schizophrenia’ are common in severe mania.

Visions can occur but are often overinterpretations of ‘fantastic sights’–for example a beautiful star-filled night sky is reported as a ‘choir of angels’.

Psychotic symptoms in mania are usually mood congruent, i.e. they reflect the underlying mood, either of elation or of irritability, rather than being disconnected and bizarre.

Confusion and visual hallucinations should prompt consideration of a possible organic (or drug-related) state but confusion can occur particularly in postpartum states.

1.7 What is hypomania?

As the name suggests (Greek, hypo, under), hypomania is the same condition as mania but with a lesser degree of symptoms and more importantly less impairment and disability. In fact hypomania can be a very desirable state, with the patient feeling very well physically and mentally, having lots of energy, not needing much sleep, thinking fast with lots of ideas and feeling confident. Although there may be lots of ideas, productivity is often low: ‘I’ve got all the ideas but I can’t put anything into practice’. However, unlike mania, concentration can still be good and psychotic symptoms are not present.

The border between hypomania and mania is not clear and there are a number of different definitions. The most useful definition draws a clinical line so that if the symptoms are causing clear disability and last more than a few (e.g. 4) days, then this is mania. If symptoms are below that line then it is hypomania.

As you would expect, it is unusual for patients to present to doctors with hypomania, as it would not be seen as a condition requiring treatment even if they do recognise the change from their normal state. However, many (but not all) people who experience hypomania also have periods of depression which they find distressing and disabling.

Why do so many psychiatrists call patients hypomanic when they are clearly at an extreme of mental illness with manic symptoms? It may be that the term ‘manic’ is seen as rather derogatory and ‘hypomanic’ seems less worrying and extreme. Many of us hang on to the way we used terms when we were training and minding our language is a challenge for all of us!

1.8 What are the symptoms of depression?

1.11 What is a mixed affective state?

The usual view of manic depression is of the two extremes of mood–very high and very low–which are seen as opposites. However, there is more in common between these states than it at first appears. Both states involve loss of sleep; overactivity is obvious in mania but it can also be present in depression in the form of agitation. The rushing thoughts of mania are apparent in speech but in depression the mind is often full of overwhelming negative thoughts going round and round that cannot be stopped. Both mood states lead to poor concentration, memory and distractibility. Psychosis can be evident in both states, though usually in different forms; disability is profound in both states when severe.

It is easier to understand ‘switching’ when the similarities between the two states are appreciated. Many depressions are followed by mania and vice versa. This is often put down to the effect of the medication but in fact it is a basic part of the illness course and was apparent well before the treatments we currently use were available.

Mixed states are the combination of manic and depressive symptoms at the same time (Fig. 1.2B). Sometimes it is just the presence of depressive ideas: feeling guilty and frightened in an otherwise clear manic state–dysphoric mania (Case vignette 1.1). For others the combination is so marked that you cannot say in which state they are in:

The treatment of mood disorders requires you to make a judgement about the predominant mood state to focus treatment. However, if you are in serious doubt or the condition is clearly a mixed state, then the right approach is to treat as you would mania. Mixed states are usually less responsive to treatments and it is advisable to aim for some longer term treatment that is likely to prevent relapse rather than focus just on the current episode. Valproate is likely to be more effective than lithium in treating a mixed state.

A good general approach in bipolar illness is to focus on long-term considerations rather than just on the current symptoms. Looking only at the immediately apparent symptoms can lead to making frequent changes in treatment to deal with a changing clinical picture whereas enhancing the long-term treatment is more likely to lead to sustained improvements in stability and mood.

1.12 What does rapid cycling mean?

The frequency of recurrence in manic depression is very variable. The usual pattern is an episodic illness with a sustained recovery for several months or even years between episodes. Many will have an individual episode which consists of a period of both depression and mania which follow straight on from one another and then recovery ensues.

However, some patients have a very unstable illness which is frequently changing. Rapid cycling is usually defined as having four episodes in 1 year; this could mean alternating between mania and depression twice in a year or having episodes separated by periods of being in normal mood. The pattern is so variable that one person’s rapid cycling can be very different from that of another. Someone may have six episodes of depression in a year, each lasting a few weeks but then recovery in between; another patient can be ill throughout the year but move several times between mania and depression. The speed of changing between episodes can become very fast so that week to week the patient is in a different phase of the illness and sometimes it becomes so extreme that the illness changes from one day to the next. At this extreme it can be difficult to disentangle from a mixed affective state when people have facets of both mania and depression in the same day (see Q 6.23).

Rapid cycling is uncommon and at any one time fewer than 5% of manic depressives will be in this state. It is more common among those who are taking antidepressant drugs; stopping these is the first line of treatment and can make a dramatic difference to the course of the illness. It is also worth checking thyroid function as this is commonly associated with unstable bipolar illness.

Rapid cycling does tend to resolve itself in the longer run, and it is unusual to stay in this state for more than a year.

1.15 What is schizoaffective disorder?

Probably two-thirds of patients with mania have psychotic symptoms (but a smaller proportion of depressions) and often these delusions and hallucinations are similar to the ideas and experiences found in schizophrenia. The main difference between the psychoses of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is that you would expect the psychotic symptoms to disappear as the manic or depressive symptoms recede. Schizoaffective disorder refers to those patients whose psychosis does not fit this neat pattern of a close relationship between affective and psychotic symptoms.

There is a large number of definitions of schizoaffective disorder and a pragmatic approach to these definitions, based on what treatment approach is likely to be most useful, is recommended.

There is a group of patients who suffer from depression but also have prominent psychotic symptoms, both during the depression and outside of periods of depression, who are actually on the border (if not in the territory) of schizophrenia. Some of these people would qualify as schizoaffective. There are many patients who suffer from schizophrenia who also experience (commonly) depression and (occasionally) mania. Usually the depressed schizophrenics would stay in the schizophrenia group but those who become manic would usually be put in a schizoaffective category.

There are also people with clear manic and depressive episodes who, when you saw them in an episode of illness, you would clearly classify as manic depressive. However, when they recover they still have some persistent psychotic symptoms–either delusions or hallucinations–which require treatment in their own right. These people are in the grey area between schizophrenia and manic depression and this is the main group that would be classified as schizoaffective as treatment needs to be focused on both types of symptom (Fig. 1.3 and Case vignette 6.3).

Antipsychotics are the mainstay of treatment in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, but mood symptoms may also be a target for treatment.

1.16 Why does it take several years for some patients to get a correct diagnosis of bipolar disorder?

When you look back at the history of people with manic depression it is very common to find that it takes up to 10 years for the correct diagnosis to be reached (Case vignette 1.2). This can be for the practical reason that they were only suffering from depression for several years and so it was not possible to make a bipolar diagnosis until the manic episode appeared!

Manic symptoms can also get buried in alcohol and drug misuse. It is common for those who are manic to drink heavily or to take drugs. The disinhibition and irritability of mania are then put down to the alcohol or drugs and not recognised as symptoms of mania.

Many manic episodes are characterised by irritability rather than elation. This is less easy to recognise and more likely to be seen as an aspect of personality rather than as an illness. This can be a particularly difficult problem to unravel but it can be very useful to go through all the symptoms of mania to make as good an assessment as possible.

At the other end of the spectrum young people can present with a severe psychotic illness with disturbed behaviour, again often complicated by drug misuse. The diagnosis can then be unclear as to whether this is mania, schizophrenia or a drug-induced state. It is common for those who have severe manic depression to be given an early diagnosis of acute schizophrenia. If you see this in the notes but are sure the current symptoms are manic then you are probably right. In the acute situation this may not make much difference to the treatment but it will make a difference to estimating prognosis and deciding long-term treatment.

imageCASE VIGNETTE 1.2 REACHING THE CORRECT DIAGNOSIS

Liz was referred but her husband attended as she would not come. In fact she had left home and rented a flat in Birmingham where she had some friends. He described a usually confident woman who had a wide circle of friends gradually changing over the last year. She seemed more irritable and dissatisfied and they had been getting into a lot of arguments. They had stopped sleeping together as she seemed to have become very restless at night and disturbed him.

Over the past 2 weeks their relationship had deteriorated and she had left. He had tried to stop her driving away and she had bumped the car into the wall trying to avoid him. She had been arrested later that evening because she was speeding and had initially failed an alcohol breath test but was later released.

Two months later she did come to the clinic. She was depressed and feeling terrible, she still did not think that all the previous martial problems were entirely her fault but did accept that she had been behaving erratically. She had spent 6 weeks in Birmingham, had enjoyed some of this and spent a lot of money. Her friends had been very welcoming at first and took her side against her husband but they gradually got fed up with her and encouraged her to go back home. By this time her mood was changing and she felt that she could not cope living on her own.

She described several periods of depression over the previous 15 years for which she had not sought treatment. She had also suffered a breakdown in her teens which led to her spending 2 months in hospital. She had hated this experience, blamed her mother for it and it had made her very averse to seeing doctors.

She did not think that she suffered from manic depression, but over the following 2 years did agree to try treatment with lithium and was pleasantly surprised to find that she went through a whole year without a period of depression.

1.17 How can I improve my ability to diagnose bipolar disorder?

You will be able to find patients that you can clearly classify: those with unipolar recurrent depressions and other patients with a clear manic depressive illness. However, there are a large number of patients in the middle who are much more challenging diagnostically. The two main problems in making the diagnosis are eliciting the symptoms and making a judgement.

MAKING A JUDGEMENT

When you have the information, you then have the second problem in that you have to make a judgement as to whether this crosses the line between normal variation and hypomania or between hypomania and mania. Even the most expert clinician has difficulty in making these judgements and their meaning in terms of treatment is still under dispute. You should be basing this judgement on the presence of symptoms, their severity, pervasiveness and persistence.

The essence of treatment of these conditions is long-term involvement and, as with many illnesses, it becomes clearer as time goes on, so it is entirely reasonable to shift your diagnosis as you become more familiar with the clinical course. You are much more likely to make serious mistakes if you are too wedded to your diagnosis and therefore unwilling to change when contradictory information arises. (The situation I have been most caught out in is when I have made a diagnosis of personality disorder and drug misuse and then find it difficult to accept when I see evidence of manic and depressive syndromes.)