Viral, fungal, protozoal and helminthic infections

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1636 times

Chapter 15 Viral, fungal, protozoal and helminthic infections

Viral infections

Antiviral agents are most active when viruses are replicating. The earlier that treatment is given, therefore, the better the result. Apart from primary infection, viral illness is often the consequence of reactivation of latent virus in the body. Patients whose immune systems are compromised may suffer particularly severe illness. Viruses are capable of developing resistance to antimicrobial drugs, with similar implications for the individual patient, for the community and for drug development. An overview of drugs that have proved effective against virus diseases appears in Table 15.1.

Table 15.1 Drugs of choice for virus infections

Organism Drug of choice Alternative
Varicella zoster    
    chickenpox Aciclovir Valaciclovir or famciclovir
    zoster Aciclovir or famciclovir Valaciclovir
Herpes simplex    
    keratitis Aciclovir (topical)  
    labial Aciclovir (topical and/or oral) Valaciclovir or famciclovir
    genital Aciclovir (topical and/or oral) Valaciclovir
  Famciclovir (oral) Penciclovir
    encephalitis Aciclovir  
    disseminated Aciclovir Foscarnet
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Lamivudine/emtricitabine Abacavir
  Tenofovir Didanoside
  Zidovudine Stavudine
  Lopinavir/ritonavir Saquinavir
  Atazanavir Darunavir
  Fosamprenavir Tipranavir
  Efavirenz Nevirapine
  Etravirine  
  Raltegravir  
  Enfuvirtide  
  Maraviroc  
Hepatitis B Pegylated interferon α-2a and interferon 2b, lamivudine Adefovir, tenofovir, entecavir, telbivudine
Hepatitis C Pegylated interferon α-2a or interferon 2b plus ribavirin  
Hepatitis D Interferon-α Pegylated interferon α-2a and interferon 2b
Influenza A Zanamivir, oseltamivir Amantadine
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Valganciclovir, ganciclovir Foscarnet, cidofovir
Respiratory syncytial virus Ribavirin Palivizumab
Papillomavirus (genital warts) Imiquimod  
Molluscum contagiosum Imiquimod Cidofovir

Herpes simplex and varicella zoster

Aciclovir

Aciclovir (t½ 3 h) is a nucleoside analogue that is selectively phosphorylated by virus-specific thymidine kinase. Phosphorylated aciclovir inhibits viral replication by acting as a substrate for viral DNA polymerase, thus accounting for its high therapeutic index. It is effective against susceptible herpes viruses if started early in the course of infection, but it does not eradicate persistent infection because viral DNA is integrated in the host genome. About 20% is absorbed from the gut, but this is sufficient for oral systemic treatment of some infections. It distributes widely in the body; the concentration in CSF is approximately half that of plasma, and the brain concentration may be even lower. These differences are taken into account in dosing for viral encephalitis (for which aciclovir must be given i.v.). Dose adjustment is required for patients with impaired renal function, as the drug is predominantly excreted in the urine. For oral and topical use the drug is given five times daily. It can be given twice daily orally for suppressive therapy.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

According to World Health Organization data, 33 million people worldwide were living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in 2008, with close to 3 million new infections yearly; almost 10 million were in need of antiretroviral therapy but more than half of these had no access to treatment.

General comments

The aims of antiretroviral therapy are to delay disease progression and prolong survival by suppressing the replication of the virus. Optimal suppression also prevents the emergence of drug resistance and reduces the risks of onward transmission to sexual partners and the unborn children of HIV-infected mothers. Virological failure may be defined as primary where there is inability to reduce plasma HIV viral load to fewer than 50 copies per microlitre despite 6 months of antiretroviral therapy, or secondary if there is failure to maintain viral load suppression at less than 50 copies per microlitre.

No current antiviral agents or combinations eliminate HIV infection, but the most effective combinations (so-called ‘highly active antiretroviral therapy’, HAART) produce profound suppression of viral replication in many patients and allow useful reconstitution of the immune system, measured by a fall in the plasma viral load and an increase in the numbers of cytotoxic T cells (CD4 count). Rates of opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis are reduced when CD4 counts are restored, and life expectancy is markedly increased.

Combination therapy reduces the risks of emergence of resistance to antiretroviral drugs, which is increasing in incidence even in patients newly diagnosed with HIV. Mutations in the viral genome either prevent binding of the drug to the active site of the protease or reverse transcriptase enzymes, or lead to removal of the drug from the reverse transcriptase active site. The potential for rapid development of resistance is immense because untreated HIV replicates rapidly (50% of circulating virus is replaced daily), the spontaneous mutation rate is high, the genome is small, the virus will develop single mutations at every codon every day, and for many antiretroviral agents a single mutation will render the virus fully resistant.

The decision to begin antiretroviral therapy is based primarily on the CD4 cell count (most current recommendations are to start in patients with counts below 350 cells per microlitre). Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy should also be considered for patients with CD4 cell count above 350 cells per microlitre but a low CD4 percentage (e.g < 14%), those with an AIDS diagnosis (e.g. Kaposi sarcoma), hepatitis B and HIV co-infection where treatment is indicated, and in conditions where achieving a suppressed viral load is desired in order to prevent transmission (e.g. in pregnancy).

There are currently more than 20 approved antiretroviral agents in four classes, plus various fixed drug combinations (Table 15.2).

Current HAART regimens use a combination of drugs that act at different phases of the viral life cycle. The most frequently used combinations employ a backbone of two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (rPI). The choice for the individual patient is best made after reference to contemporary, expert advice (see the websites listed in the Guide to further reading).

Alternative combinations are used if these variables deteriorate or unwanted drug effects occur. Antiretroviral resistance testing, both genetic (by searching viral RNA for sequences coding for resistance) and phenotypic (by testing antiretroviral agents against the patient’s virus in cell culture), also guide the choice of drug regimen, especially after virological failure.

Pregnancy and breast feeding pose special problems. The objectives of therapy are to minimise drug toxicity to the fetus while reducing the maternal viral load and the catastrophic results of HIV transmission to the neonate. Prevention of maternal–fetal and maternal–infant spread is the most cost-effective way of using antiretroviral drugs in less developed countries. Maternal–fetal transmission rates are related to maternal viral load, with rates of 0.1% reported when maternal viral load is less than 50 copies per microlitre while on HAART. Where resources permit, access to safe alternatives to breast feeding should be provided to infected mothers.

Combination antiretroviral therapy, especially the thymidine nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors zidovudine and stavudine, causes redistribution of body fat in some patients – the ‘lipodystrophy syndrome’. Protease inhibitors can disturb lipid and glucose metabolism to a degree that warrants a change to drugs with limited effects on lipid metabolism, e.g. ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, and the introduction of lipid-lowering agents.

Impaired cell-mediated immunity leaves the host prey to opportunistic infections including: candidiasis, coccidioidomycosis, cryptosporidiosis, CMV disease, herpes simplex, histoplasmosis, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, toxoplasmosis and tuberculosis (often with multiply resistant organisms). Treatment of these conditions is referred to elsewhere in this text.2

Improvement in immune function as a result of antiretroviral treatment may provoke an inflammatory reaction against residual opportunistic organisms (immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, IRIS). Although infrequent, this may present with development of new infections or worsening opportunistic infections, e.g. tuberculosis and cryptococcal disease.

Antiretroviral drugs may also be used in combination to reduce the risks of infection with HIV from injuries, e.g. from HIV-contaminated needles and following sexual exposure to a high-risk partner. The decision to offer such post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and the optimal combination of drugs used, is a matter for experts; administration must begin within a few hours of exposure and continue for 28 days.

Some drugs described here have found additional indications, or are used only, for therapy of non-HIV infections, e.g. adefovir for chronic hepatitis B infection.

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors

The HIV replicates by converting its single-stranded RNA into double-stranded DNA, which is incorporated into host DNA; this crucial conversion, the reverse of the normal cellular transcription of nucleic acids, is accomplished by the enzyme reverse transcriptase. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have a high affinity for the reverse transcriptase enzyme and are integrated by it into the viral DNA chain, causing premature chain termination. While all nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors require activation by host enzymes to triphosphates prior to incorporation into the DNA chain, tenofovir (as the only nucleotide analogue) is unique in requiring only two phosphorylations for activation.

Zidovudine (AZT, Retrovir)

Zidovudine, a thymidine analogue, is the first antiretroviral licensed for the treatment of HIV-1. Resistance develops rapidly when used as monotherapy through the sequential accumulation of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) at codon 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219; conversely, point mutations at codon 184 selected by lamivudine and emtricitabine therapy enhance susceptibility to zidovudine (and stavudine) by delaying the emergence of TAMs.

Protease inhibitors

In its process of replication, HIV produces precursor proteins, which are subsequently cleaved by the protease enzyme into component parts and reassembled into virus particles; protease inhibitors disrupt this essential process.

Protease inhibitors reduce viral RNA concentration (‘viral load’), increase the CD4 count and improve survival when used in combination with other agents. They are metabolised extensively by isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system, notably by CYP 3A4, and most protease inhibitors inhibit these enzymes. They have a plasma t½ of 2–4 h, except for fosamprenavir (8 h) and atazanavir (7 h with food). The drugs have broadly similar therapeutic effects. Members of the group include:

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

This group is structurally different from the reverse transcriptase inhibitors; members are active against the subtype HIV-1 but not HIV-2, a subtype encountered mainly in West Africa. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are metabolised by CYP 450 enzymes and hence the potential for significant drug–drug interactions. The drugs have considerably longer half-lives when compared to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Entry inhibitors

Influenza A

Neuraminidase inhibitors are highlighted by the emergence of avian influenza viruses with the potential for mutation to cause pandemic spread in the human population, although their clinical effectiveness is not high. The two antiviral drugs oseltamivir and zanamivir were widely used for the public health control of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu)

Oseltamivir is an oral prodrug of a viral neuraminidase inhibitor. It reduces the severity and duration of symptoms caused by influenza A or B in adults and children if commenced within 36 h of the onset of symptoms. More specifically, the risk of respiratory complications such as secondary pneumonia, antibiotic use and hospital admission are reduced. It is effective for post-exposure prophylaxis, where it should be started within 48 h of contact with the index case and continued daily for 10 days, a usage that might be appropriate for health-care workers and those especially likely to suffer serious complications from pre-existing illness. Prophylaxis may be given for 2 weeks after influenza immunisation while protective antibodies are being produced.

Oseltamivir is one option for treatment and prophylaxis of avian H5N1 and 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus. In the event of a pandemic, treatment for 5 days and prophylactic use for up to 6 weeks (or until 48 h after last exposure) are suggested.

Cytomegalovirus

Ganciclovir

Ganciclovir resembles aciclovir in its mode of action, but is much more toxic. An acyclic analogue of guanosine, the drug is converted to a triphosphate form which competitively inhibits virion DNA polymerase, leading to chain termination. It is given i.v. and is eliminated in the urine, mainly unchanged (t½ 4 h). Ganciclovir is active against several types of virus but toxicity limits its i.v. use to life- and sight-threatening CMV infection in immunocompromised patients, including CMV retinitis, pneumonitis, colitis and disseminated disease.

Foscarnet

Foscarnet finds use i.v. for CMV retinitis in patients with HIV infection when ganciclovir is contraindicated, and for aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus infection (see p. 213). It is generally less well tolerated than ganciclovir; adverse effects include renal toxicity (usually reversible), nausea and vomiting, neurological reactions and marrow suppression. Hypocalcaemia is seen especially when foscarnet is given with pentamidine, e.g. during treatment of multiple infections in patients with AIDS. Renal toxicity can be minimised with good hydration and dose modification. Foscarnet causes a contact dermatitis which can lead to unpleasant genital ulcerations due to high urine drug concentrations; this is potentially preventable with good urinary hygiene.

Drugs that modulate the host immune system

Interferons

Virus infection stimulates the production of protective glycoproteins (interferons) which act:

Interferons are classified as α, β or γ according to their antigenic and physical properties. α-Interferons (subclassified -2a, -2b and -N1) are effective against conditions that include hairy cell leukaemia, chronic myelogenous leukaemia, recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma in patients with AIDS (an effect that may be due partly to its activity against HIV) and condylomata acuminata (genital warts).

Interferon α-2a and -2b also improve the manifestations of viral hepatitis, but responses differ according to the infecting agent. Therapy with interferon α-2b leads in about a third of patients with chronic hepatitis B to loss of circulating ‘e’ antigen, a return to normal liver enzyme levels, histological improvement in liver architecture, and a lowered rate of progression of liver disease. It is contraindicated in patients with decompensated liver disease.

Pegylated (bound to polyethylene glycol) interferon α-2a is more effective than standard interferon α and is now the standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Over 50% of patients with hepatitis C respond to the combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, and 30–40% to peg-interferon alone. Successful treatment results in the serum concentration of viral RNA becoming undetectable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Hepatitis D (δ agent co-infection with hepatitis B) requires a much larger dose of interferon to obtain a response, and relapse may yet occur when the drug is withdrawn. Interferon α-2b may be effective in West Nile virus encephalitis.

See also p. 553 for lamivudine and adefovir, use in chronic hepatitis B infection.

Fungal infections

Widespread use of immunosuppressive chemotherapy and the emergence of AIDS have contributed to a rise in the incidence of opportunistic infection ranging from comparatively trivial cutaneous infections to systemic diseases that demand prolonged treatment with potentially toxic agents.

Superficial mycoses

Candida infections

Cutaneous infection is generally treated with topical amphotericin, clotrimazole, econazole, miconazole or nystatin. Local hygiene is also important. An underlying explanation should be sought when a patient fails to respond to these measures, e.g. diabetes, the use of a broad-spectrum antibiotic or of immunosuppressive drugs.

Candidiasis of the alimentary tract mucosa responds to amphotericin, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole or nystatin as lozenges (to suck, for oral infection), gel (held in the mouth before swallowing), suspension or tablets.

Vaginal candidiasis is treated by clotrimazole, econazole, isoconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole or nystatin as pessaries or vaginal tablets or cream inserted once or twice a day with cream or ointment on surrounding skin. Failure may be due to a concurrent intestinal infection causing re-infection, and nystatin tablets may be given by mouth 8-hourly with the local treatment. Alternatively, oral fluconazole may be used, now available without prescription (‘over the counter’) in the UK. The male sexual partner may use a similar antifungal ointment for his benefit and for the patient’s (re-infection).

Fluconazole is often given orally or i.v. to heavily immunocompromised patients, e.g. during periods of profound granulocytopenia, and to severely ill patients on intensive care units to reduce the incidence of systemic candidiasis. Candida albicans is rarely (1% of clinical isolates) resistant to fluconazole, but other Candida species may be, more commonly in hospitals where prophylactic fluconazole use is extensive.

Isolation of candida from the bloodstream or intravenous catheter tips of patients with predisposing factors for systemic candidasis, e.g. prolonged intravenous access, neutropenia, is associated with a significant risk of serious sequelae, e.g. retinal or renal deposits, and should be treated with an effective antifungal for at least 3 weeks; fluconazole, amphotericin or any of the echinocandins will be appropriate.

Systemic mycoses

The principal treatment options are summarised in Table 15.3.

Table 15.3 Drugs of choice for some fungal infections

Infection Drug of first choice Alternative
Aspergillosis Amphotericin or voriconazole Caspofungin, itraconazole, posaconazole
Blastomycosisa Itraconazole or amphotericin Fluconazole
Candidiasis    
    mucosal Fluconazole or amphotericin Caspofungin, voriconazole or fluconazole
    systemic Fluconazole or amphotericin ± flucytosine Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, voriconazole
Coccidioidomycosisa Fluconazole, amphotericin or itraconazole  
Cryptococcosis Amphotericin + flucytosine (followed by fluconazole) Fluconazole
Fusariosis Voriconazole Amphotericin
Histoplasmosis Itraconazole or amphotericin Fluconazole
    chronic suppressionb Itraconazole Amphotericin
Mucormycosis Amphotericin Posaconazole
Paracoccidioidomycosis Itraconazole or amphotericin Ketoconazolec
Pseudallescheriasis Voriconazole, ketoconazole or itraconazole  
Sporotrichosis    
    cutaneous Itraconazole Potassium iodide
    deep Amphotericin Itraconazole or fluconazole
Tinea pedis Terbinafine cream or topical azole (miconazole, clotrimazole, econazole) Fluconazole

This table was drawn substantially from The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics (2005, USA).

The authors are grateful to the Chairman of the Editorial Board for permission to publish the material.

a Patients with severe illness, meningitis, AIDS or some other causes of immunosuppression should receive amphotericin.

b For patients with AIDS.

c Continue treatment for 6–12 months.

Drugs that disrupt the fungal cell membrane

Polyenes

These act by binding tightly to sterols present in cell membranes. The resulting deformity of the membrane allows leakage of intracellular ions and enzymes, causing cell death. Those polyenes that have useful antifungal activity bind selectively to ergosterol, the most important sterol in fungal (but not mammalian) cell walls.

Amphotericin (amphotericin B)

Amphotericin is absorbed negligibly from the gut and must be given by i.v. infusion for systemic infection; about 10% remains in the blood and the fate of the remainder is not known but is probably bound to tissues. The t½ is 15 days and, after stopping treatment, drug persists in the body for several weeks.

Amphotericin is at present the drug of choice for most systemic fungal infections (but see Table 15.3). The diagnosis of systemic infection should, whenever possible, be firmly established; tissue biopsy and culture may be necessary, and methods using the PCR to detect aspergillus DNA may revolutionise management of invasive infection.

A conventional course of treatment for filamentous fungal infection lasts 6–12 weeks, during which at least 2 g amphotericin is given (usually 0.7–1 mg/kg daily, and up to 10 mg/kg daily of lipid-associated formulations for the most severe, invasive infections), but lower total and daily doses (e.g. 0.6 mg/kg daily) are used for candida infections, with correspondingly better tolerance. Antifungal drugs may be combined with immune-stimulating agents, e.g. granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and clinical response in neutropenic episodes is closely related to return of normal neutrophil counts.

Lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin offer the prospect of reduced risk of toxicity while retaining therapeutic efficacy. In an aqueous medium, a lipid with hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties will form vesicles (liposomes) comprising an outer lipid bilayer surrounding an aqueous centre. The AmBisome formulation incorporates amphotericin in a lipid bilayer (55–75 nm diameter) from which the drug is released. Other lipid-associated complexes include Abelcet (‘amphotericin B lipid complex’) and Amphocil (‘amphotericin B colloidal dispersion’). Lipid-associated formulations may be more effective for some indications because higher doses (3 mg/kg daily) may be given rapidly and safely. They are the first choice when renal function is impaired. Treatment often begins with the conventional formulation in those with normal kidneys, resorting to lipid-associated formulations if the patient’s renal function deteriorates.

Azoles

The antibacterial, antiprotozoal and anthelminthic members of this group are described in the appropriate sections. Antifungal azoles comprise the following:

Ketoconazole

Ketoconazole is well absorbed from the gut (poorly where there is gastric hypoacidity; see below); it is widely distributed in tissues but concentrations in CSF and urine are low; its action is terminated by metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A (t½ 8 h). For systemic mycoses, ketoconazole (see Table 15.3) has been superseded by fluconazole and itraconazole on grounds of improved pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy. Impairment of steroid synthesis by ketoconazole has been put to other uses, e.g. inhibition of testosterone synthesis lessens bone pain in patients with advanced androgen-dependent prostatic cancer.

Itraconazole

Itraconazole is available for oral (suspension and capsule) and i.v. administration (t½ 25 h, increasing to 40 h with continuous treatment). The intravenous preparation is not available in many countries. Absorption from the gut is about 55%, but variable. It is improved by ingestion with food, but decreased by fatty meals and therapies that reduce gastric acidity. Plasma concentrations should be monitored during prolonged use for critical indications. The oral suspension formulation has significantly improved bio-availability compared to the capsule formulation and is much less affected by gastric hypoacidity. Itraconazole is heavily protein bound and virtually none is found within the CSF. It is almost completely oxidised in the liver (by CYP 3A) and excreted in the bile; little unchanged drug enters the urine.

Itraconazole is used for a variety of superficial mycoses, as a prophylactic agent for aspergillosis and candidiasis in the immunocompromised, and i.v. for treatment of histoplasmosis. It is licensed in the UK as a second-line agent for Candida, Aspergillus and Cryptococcus infections, and it may be convenient as ‘follow-on’ therapy after systemic aspergillosis has been brought under control by an amphotericin preparation. It appears to be an effective adjunct treatment for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

Voriconazole

Voriconazole (t½ 7 h) is more active in vitro than itraconazole against Aspergillus because of more avid binding of the sterol synthetic enzymes of filamentous fungi; it also appears to have synergistic activity against Aspergillus in combination with amphotericin. It is as active as the other triazoles against yeasts and is more reliably and rapidly absorbed than itraconazole by mouth, but cross-resistance between these agents is usual. It is more effective than conventional amphotericin in invasive aspergillosis, and probably equivalent to lipid-associated formulations. Oral absorption is not significantly reduced by gastric hypoacidity. CSF and brain tissue concentrations are at least 50% of those in the plasma, and are sufficient for effective therapy of fungal infections of the eye and CNS.

Drugs that disrupt the fungal cell wall

Echinocandins

The echinocandins are large lipopeptide molecules that inhibit synthesis of β-(1,3)-d-glucan, a vital component of the cell walls of many fungi (excepting Cryptococcus neoformans, against which they have no useful activity). In vitro and in vivo, the echinocandins are rapidly fungicidal against most Candida spp. and fungistatic against Aspergillus spp. Echinocandins have no activity against emerging pathogens such as Fusarium sp., Scedosporium sp. and zygomycetes. They are available as i.v. preparations only.

Other antifungal drugs

Protozoal infections

Malaria

About half of the world’s population is exposed to malaria, with an estimated 250 million cases and 1 million deaths annually, mainly in sub-Saharan African children (where a child dies from malaria on average every 30 seconds). In terms of socioeconomic impact, malaria is the most important of the transmissible parasitic diseases.

Quinine as cinchona bark was introduced into Europe from South America in 1631 (by Agostino Salumbrino, a Jesuit priest and trained apothecary, who sent a small quantity of bark to Rome where much of the terrain was swampy and fevers were common – hence the term ‘Jesuit’s bark’). It was used for all fevers, among them malaria, the occurrence of which was associated with damp places with bad air (‘mal aria’).

Life cycle of the malaria parasite and sites of drug action

The incubation period of malaria is 10–35 days. The principal features of the life cycle (Fig. 15.1) of the malaria parasite must be known in order to understand its therapy.

Female anopheles mosquitoes require a blood meal for egg production, and in the process of feeding they inject salivary fluid containing sporozoites into humans. As no drugs are effective against sporozoites, infection with the malaria parasite cannot be prevented.

Sexual forms

(site 3 in Fig. 15.1)

Some merozoites differentiate into male and female gametocytes in the erythrocytes and can develop further only if they are ingested by a mosquito, where they form sporozoites (site 4 in Fig. 15.1) and complete the transmission cycle.

Quinine, mefloquine, chloroquine, artesunate, artemether and primaquine (gametocytocides) act on sexual forms and prevent transmission of the infection because the patient becomes non-infective and the parasite fails to develop in the mosquito (site 4).

In summary,

drugs may be selected for:

Drugs used for malaria, and their principal actions, are classified in Table 15.4.

Table 15.4 Antimalarial drugs and their sites of action

Drug Biological activity
  Blood schizontocide Tissue schizontocide
4-Aminoquinolone    
    chloroquine ++ 0
Arylaminoakohols    
    quinine ++ 0
    mefloquine ++ 0
Phenanthrene methanol    
    halofantrine ++ 0
    lumefantrine ++ 0
Antimetabolites    
    proguanil + +
    pyrimethamine + 0
    sulfadoxine + 0
    dapsone + 0
Antibiotics    
    tetracycline + +
    doxycycline + +
    minocycline + +
8-Aminoquinolone    
    primaquine 0 +
Sesquiterpenes    
    artesunate + 0
    artemether + 0

Chemotherapy of an acute attack of malaria3

Successful management demands attention to the following points of principle:

Falciparum (‘malignant’) malaria

Falciparum malaria in the non-immune is a medical emergency, and malaria of unknown infecting species should be treated as though it were falciparum. The regimen depends on the condition of the patient; the doses quoted are for adults. Chloroquine resistance is now widespread; therefore this drug should not be used for the treatment of falciparum malaria.

If the patient can swallow

and there are no serious complications such as impairment of consciousness, treatment options are as follows:

A quinine salt:4 600 mg 8-hourly by mouth for 5–7 days, followed by doxycycline 200 mg daily for at least 7 days. This additional therapy is necessary as quinine alone tends to be associated with a higher rate of relapse. Clindamycin (450 mg four times daily for 7 days) may be given as an alternative follow-on therapy instead of doxycycline, and is particularly suitable for pregnant women. If the parasite is likely to be sensitive, Fansidar (pyrimethamine plus sulfadoxine) 3 tablets as a single dose is an alternative.

Malarone (atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride): 4 tablets once daily for 3 days.

Riamet (artemether plus lumefantrine): if weight > 35 kg, 4 tablets initially, followed by five further doses of 4 tablets given at 8, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h.

Mefloquine is also effective, but resistance has been reported in several regions, including South-East Asia. It is not necessary to use follow-on therapy after Riamet, mefloquine or Malarone.

Seriously ill patients

should be treated with:

A quinine salt:4 20 mg/kg as a loading dose5 (maximum 1.4 g) infused i.v. over 4 h, followed 8 h later by a maintenance infusion of 10 mg/kg (maximum 700 mg) infused over 4 h, repeated every 8 h6 until the patient can swallow tablets to complete the 7-day course. Patients at increased risk of arrhythmias and the elderly should have ECG monitoring while on the infusion.

Doxycycline or clindamycin should be given subsequently, as above (mefloquine is an alternative, but this must begin at least 12 h after parenteral quinine has ceased).

Intravenous artesunate showed a clear benefit when compared to quinine in patients with severe falciparum malaria.7 A large randomised trial showed a 34% reduction in mortality with intravenous artesunate when compared to quinine; the number needed to treat to prevent one death was 13.8 Intravenous artesunate is not licensed in the European Union, but should be considered on a ‘named patient’ basis for severe cases not responsive to quinine or if quinine resistance is suspected, or there is a high parasite count (> 20%). Intravenous artesunate should be accompanied by a 7-day course of doxycycline.

Treatment in pregnancy should always be based on expert advice.

Chemoprophylaxis of malaria

Geographically variable plasmodial drug resistance has become a major factor. The World Health Organization gives advice in its annually revised booklet Vaccination Certificate Requirements and Health Advice for International Travel, and national bodies publish recommendations, e.g. British National Formulary, that apply particularly to their own residents.

General principles

Chemoprophylaxis aims to prevent deaths from falciparum malaria, but only ever gives relative protection; travellers should guard against bites by using mosquito nets and repellents, and wearing well-covering clothing especially during high-risk times of day (after dusk).

Mefloquine, doxycycline and atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone) are the most commonly advised prophylactic regimens, and are particularly recommended for areas of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. Chloroquine, alone or in combination with proguanil, may be considered in areas of the world where the risk of acquiring chloroquine resistant falciparum malaria is low, although there is considerable concern regarding the protective efficacy of this regimen. Due to widespread P. falciparum resistance to proguanil, single-agent prophylaxis with this agent is rarely appropriate for most regions of the world.

Effective chemoprophylaxis requires that there be a plasmodicidal concentration of drug in the blood when the first infected mosquito bites, and that it be sustained safely for long periods.

The progressive rise in plasma concentration to steady state (after t½ × 5), sometimes attained only after weeks (consider mefloquine t½ 21 days, chloroquine t½ 50 days), allows unwanted effects (which can impair compliance or be unsafe) to be delayed, in some instances until after a subject has entered a malarial area. Thus, it is advised that prophylaxis begin long enough before travel to reveal acute intolerance and to impress on the subject the importance of compliance (to relate drug-taking to a specific daily or weekly event).

Prompt achievement of efficacy and safety, i.e. plasmodicidal concentrations, by one (or two) doses is plainly important for travellers who cannot wait on dosage schedules to deliver both only when steady-state blood concentrations are attained; the schedules must reflect this need.

Prophylaxis should continue for at least 4 weeks after leaving an endemic area to kill parasites that are acquired about the time of departure, are still incubating in the liver and will develop into the erythrocyte phase. Malarone, however, only needs to be taken for a week after return. The traveller should be aware that any illness occurring within a year, and especially within 3 months, of return, may be malaria.

Chloroquine and proguanil may be used for periods of up to 5 years, and mefloquine for up to 1–2 years; expert advice should be taken by long-term travellers, especially those going to areas for which other prophylactic drugs are recommended.

Naturally acquired immunity offers the most reliable protection for people living permanently in endemic areas (below). Repeated attacks of malaria confer partial immunity and the disease often becomes no more than an occasional inconvenience. Vaccines to confer active immunity are under development.

A short course of prophylaxis (4–6 weeks) may be considered for pregnant women and young children returning to their permanent homes in malarious areas after a prolonged period of stay in a non-endemic area, pending suitable arrangements for health care.

As a rule, the partially immune should not take a prophylactic. The reasoning is that immunity is sustained by the red cell cycle, loss of which through prophylaxis diminishes their resistance and leaves them highly vulnerable to the disease. There are, however, exceptions to this general advice, and the partially immune may or should use a prophylactic:

Individual antimalarial drugs

Chloroquine

Chloroquine (t½ 50 days) is concentrated within parasitised red cells and forms complexes with plasmodial DNA. It is active against the blood forms and also the gametocytes (formed in the mosquito) of Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae; it is ineffective against many strains of Plasmodium falciparum and also its immature gametocytes. Chloroquine is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is concentrated several-fold in various tissues, e.g. erythrocytes, liver, spleen, heart, kidney, cornea and retina; the long t½ reflects slow release from these sites. A priming dose is used in order to achieve adequate free plasma concentration (see acute attack, above). Chloroquine is partly inactivated by metabolism and the remainder is excreted unchanged in the urine.

Acute overdose

may be rapidly fatal without treatment, and indeed has even been described as a means of suicide.10 Pulmonary oedema is followed by convulsions, cardiac arrhythmias and coma; as little as 50 mg/kg can be fatal. These effects are principally due to the profound negative inotropic action of chloroquine. Diazepam was found fortuitously to protect the heart and adrenaline/epinephrine reduces intraventricular conduction time; this combination of drugs, given by separate i.v. infusions, improves survival.

Mefloquine

Mefloquine (t½ 21 days) is similar in several respects to quinine although it does not intercalate with plasmodial DNA. It is used for malaria chemoprophylaxis, and occasionally to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum (both chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant) and chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria. Mefloquine is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and its action is terminated by metabolism. When used for prophylaxis, 250 mg (base)/week should be taken, commencing 1–3 weeks before entering and continued for 4 weeks after leaving a malarious area. It should not be given to patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Quinine

Quinine (t½ 9 h; 18 h in severe malaria) is obtained from the bark of the South American cinchona tree. It binds to plasmodial DNA to prevent protein synthesis but its exact mode of action remains uncertain. It is used to treat Plasmodium falciparum malaria in areas of multiple drug resistance. Apart from its antiplasmodial effect, quinine is used for myotonia and muscle cramps because it prolongs the muscle refractory period. Quinine is included in dilute concentration in tonics and aperitifs for its desired bitter taste.

Quinine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is almost completely metabolised in the liver.

Amoebiasis

Infection occurs when mature cysts are ingested and pass into the colon, where they divide into trophozoites; these forms either enter the tissues or form cysts. Amoebiasis occurs in two forms, both of which need treatment:

Treatment with tissue amoebicides should always be followed by a course of a luminal amoebicide to eradicate the source of the infection.

Dehydroemetine

(from ipecacuanha), less toxic than the parent emetine, is claimed by some authorities to be the most effective tissue amoebicide. It is reserved for the treatment of metronidazole-resistant amoebiasis and in dangerously ill patients, but these are more likely to be vulnerable to its cardiotoxic effects. When dehydroemetine is used to treat amoebic liver abscess, chloroquine should also be given.

The drug treatment of other protozoal infections is summarised in Table 15.5.

Table 15.5 Drugs for some protozoal infections

Infection Drug and comment
Giardiasis Metronidazole, tinidazole or mepacrine
Leishmaniasis  
    visceral Sodium stibogluconate or meglumine antimoniate; resistant cases may benefit from combining antimonials with paromomycin, miltefosine or amphotericin (including AmBisome). Pentamidine is rarely used now due to toxicity concerns
    cutaneous Mild lesions heal spontaneously, fluconazole; antimonials or paromomycin may be injected intralesionally
Toxoplasmosis Most infections are self-limiting in the immunologically normal patient. Pyrimethamine with sulfadiazine for chorioretinitis, and active toxoplasmosis in immunodeficient patients; folinic acid is used to counteract the inevitable megaloblastic anaemia. Alternatives include pyrimethamine with clindamycin or azithromycin or atovaquone. Spiramycin for primary toxoplasmosis in pregnant women. Expert advice is essential
Trichomoniasis Metronidazole or tinidazole is effective
Trypanosomiasis  
African (sleeping sickness) Suramin or pentamidine is effective during the early stages but not for the later neurological manifestations for which melarsoprol should be used. Eflornithine is effective for both early and late stages. Expert advice is recommended
American (Chagas’ disease) Prolonged (1–3 months) treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox may be effective

Notes on drugs for protozoal infections

Atovaquone is a quinone; it may cause gastrointestinal and mild neurological side-effects, and rare hepatotoxicity and blood dyscrasias.

Benznidazole is a nitroimidazole that may occasionally cause peripheral neuritis but is generally well tolerated, including by infants.

Dehydroemetine inhibits protein synthesis; it may cause pain at the site of injection, weakness and muscular pain, hypotension, precordial pain and cardiac arrhythmias.

Diloxanide furoate may cause troublesome flatulence, and pruritus and urticaria may occur.

Eflornithine inhibits protozoal DNA synthesis; it may cause anaemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, and seizures.

Iodoquinol may cause abdominal cramps, nausea and diarrhoea. Skin eruptions, pruritus ani and thyroid gland enlargement have been attributed to its iodine content. The recognition of severe neurotoxicity with the related drug, clioquinol, in Japan in the 1960s must give cause for caution in its use.

Meglumine antimonate is a pentavalent antimony compound, similar to sodium stibogluconate (below).

Melarsoprol, a trivalent organic arsenical, acts through its high affinity for sulphydryl groups of enzymes. Adverse effects include encephalopathy, myocardial damage, proteinuria and hypertension.

Mepacrine (quinacrine) was formerly used as an antimalarial but is now an alternative to metronidazole or tinidazole for giardiasis. It may cause gastrointestinal upset, occasional acute toxic psychosis, hepatitis and aplastic anaemia.

Nifurtimox is a nitrofuran derivative. Adverse effects include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, gastric pain, insomnia, headache, vertigo, excitability, myalgia, arthralgia and convulsions. Peripheral neuropathy may necessitate stopping treatment.

Paromomycin, an aminoglycoside, is not absorbed from the gut; it is similar to neomycin.

Pentamidine is a synthetic aromatic amidine; it must be administered parenterally or by inhalation as it is absorbed unreliably from the gastrointestinal tract; it does not enter the CSF. Given systemically it frequently causes nephrotoxicity, which is reversible; acute hypotension and syncope are common especially after rapid i.v. injection. Pancreatic damage may cause hypoglycaemia due to insulin release.

Sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam) is an organic pentavalent antimony compound; it may cause anorexia, vomiting, coughing and substernal pain. Used in mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, it may lead to severe inflammation around pharyngeal or tracheal lesions which may require control with corticosteroid. Meglumine antimoniate is similar.

Suramin forms stable complexes with plasma protein and is detectable in urine for up to 3 months after the last injection; it does not cross the blood–brain barrier. It may cause tiredness, anorexia, malaise, polyuria, thirst, and tenderness of the palms and soles.

Miltefosine is a phosphocholine analogue that was originally developed as an oral antineoplastic. It is the only effective oral treatment for cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. The main adverse effects are vomiting, diarrhoea and raised transaminases. The drug is teratogenic in animals, and therefore should be avoided in pregnancy and used with caution in women of reproductive age.

Helminthic infections

Helminths have complex life cycles, special knowledge of which is required by those who treat infections. Table 15.6 will suffice here. Drug resistance has not so far proved to be a clinical problem, though it has occurred in animals on continuous chemoprophylaxis.

Table 15.6 Drugs for helminthic infections

Infection Drug Comment
Cestodes (tapeworms)
Beef tapeworm Taenia saginata Niclosamide or praziquantel Praziquantel cures with single dose
Pork tapeworm Taenia solium Niclosamide or praziquantel Praziquantel cures with single dose
Cysticercosis Taenia solium Albendazole or praziquantel Treat in hospital as dying and disintegrating cysts may cause cerebral oedema
Fish tapeworm Diphyllobothrium latum Niclosamide or praziquantel  
Hydatid disease Echinococcus granulosus Albendazole Surgery for operable cyst disease
Nematodes (intestinal)
Ascariasis Ascaris lumbricoides Levamisole, mebendazole, pyrantel pamoate, piperazine or albendazole  
Hookworm Ancylostoma duodenale Mebendazole, pyrantel pamoate, or Anaemic patients require iron or blood transfusion
Necator americanus Albendazole  
Strongyloidiasis Strongyloides stercoralis Thiabendazole or ivermectin Alternatively, albendazole is better tolerated
Threadworm (pinworm) Enterobius vermicularis Pyrantel pamoate, mebendazole, albendazole or piperazine salts  
Whipworm Trichuris trichiuria Mebendazole or albendazole  
Nematodes (tissue)
Cutaneous larva migrans Ancylostoma braziliense; Ancylostoma caninum Thiabendazole (topical for single tracks); ivermectin, albendazole or oral thiabendazole (for multiple tracks) Calamine lotion for symptom relief
Guinea worm Dracunculus medinensis Metronidazole, mebendazole Rapid symptom relief
Trichinellosis Trichinella spiralis Mebendazole Prednisolone may be needed to suppress allergic and inflammatory symptoms
Visceral larva migrans Toxocara canis; Toxocara cati Diethylcarbamazine, albendazole or mebendazole Progressive escalation of dose lessens allergic reactions to dying larvae; prednisolone suppresses inflammatory response in ophthalmic disease
Lymphatic filariasis Wuchereria bancrofti; Brugia malayi; Brugia timori Diethylcarbamazine Destruction of microfilia may cause an immunological reaction (see below)
Onchocerciasis (river blindness) Onchocerca volvulus Ivermectin Cures with single dose. Suppressive treatment; a single annual dose prevents significant complications
Nematodes (tissue)—cont’d
Schistosomiasis (intestinal)    
Schistosoma mansoni; Schistosoma japonicum Praziquantel Oxamniquine only for Schistosoma mansoni
Schistosomiasis (urinary)    
Schistosoma haematobium Praziquantel Metriphonate only for Schistosoma haematobium
Flukes (intestinal, lung, liver) Praziquantel Alternatives: niclosamide for intestinal fluke, bithionol for lung fluke

Drugs for helminthic infections

Albendazole is similar to mebendazole (below).

Diethylcarbamazine kills both microfilariae and adult worms. Fever, headache, anorexia, malaise, urticaria, vomiting and asthmatic attacks following the first dose are due to products of destruction of the parasite, and reactions are minimised by slow increase in dosage over the first 3 days.

Ivermectin may cause immediate reactions due to the death of the microfilaria (see diethylcarbamazine). It can be effective in a single dose, but is best repeated at intervals of 6–12 months.

Levamisole paralyses the musculature of sensitive nematodes which, unable to maintain their anchorage, are expelled by normal peristalsis. It is well tolerated, but may cause abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness.

Mebendazole blocks glucose uptake by nematodes. Mild gastrointestinal discomfort may be caused, and it should not be used in pregnancy or in children under the age of 2 years.

Metriphonate is an organophosphorus anticholinesterase compound that was originally used as an insecticide. Adverse effects include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache and vertigo.

Niclosamide blocks glucose uptake by intestinal tapeworms. It may cause some mild gastrointestinal symptoms.

Piperazine may cause hypersensitivity reactions, neurological symptoms (including ‘worm wobble’) and may precipitate epilepsy.

Praziquantel paralyses both adult worms and larvae. It is metabolised extensively. Praziquantel may cause nausea, headache, dizziness and drowsiness; it cures with a single dose (or divided doses in 1 day).

Pyrantel depolarises neuromuscular junctions of susceptible nematodes, which are expelled in the faeces. It cures with a single dose. It may induce gastrointestinal disturbance, headache, dizziness, drowsiness and insomnia.

Tiabendazole inhibits cellular enzymes of susceptible helminths. Gastrointestinal, neurological and hypersensitivity reactions, liver damage and crystalluria may be induced.

Guide to further reading

American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-P). Their website includes a comprehensive travel section that contains high-quality and up-to-date information about prophylaxis, avoidance, diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases of travel. Available online at http://www.cdc.gov/travel/ (accessed November 2011)

Baird J.K. Effectiveness of antimalarial drugs. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2005;352(15):1565–1577.

Beigel J.H., Farrar J., Han A.M., et alWriting Committee of WHO Consultation on Human Influenza A/H5, Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. of the. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2005;353:1374–1385.

Bethony J., Brooker S., Albonico M., et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367:1521–1532.

Bouchaud O., Imbert P., Touze J.E., et al. Fatal cardiotoxicity related to halofantrine: a review based on a worldwide safety data base. Malar. J.. 2009;8:289.

British HIV Association. The Association provides a wealth of information on best practice management of HIV infection and opportunistic infections. See their website, available online at http://www.bhiva.org/ClinicalGuidelines.aspx (accessed November 2011)

Bruce-Chwatt L.J. Three hundred and fifty years of the Peruvian fever bark. Br. Med. J.. 1988;296:1486–1487.

Chiodini P., Hill D., Lalloo D., et al. Guidelines for Malaria Prevention in Travellers to the United Kingdom. London.: Health Protection Agency; 2007. January 2007

Deeks S.G. Antiretroviral treatment of HIV infected adults. Br. Med. J.. 2006;332:1489–1493.

Edwards G., Biagini G.A. Resisting resistance: dealing with the irrepressible problem of malaria. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.. 2006;61(6):690–693.

Esté J.A., Telenti A. HIV entry inhibitors. Lancet. 2007;370:81–88.

European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. Their website has an Infectious Diseases Working Party section containing recent evidence-based recommendations for managing fungal and viral infections. See European Conference on Infection in Leukaemia (ECIL-3) Working Party Guidelines. Available online at: http://www.ebmt.org (accessed November 2011)

Fit for Travel. Another useful contemporary source is ‘Fit for Travel’, the NHS public access website providing travel health information for people travelling abroad from the UK. Available online at: http://www.fitfortravel.scot.nhs.uk/ (accessed November 2011)

Franco-Paredes C., Santos-Preciado J.I. Problem pathogens: prevention of malaria in travellers. Lancet Infect. Dis.. 2006;6(3):139–149.

Gazzard B.G., Anderson J., Babiker A., et al. British HIV Association Guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008. HIV Med.. 2008;9(8):563–608.

Geisbert T.W., Jahrling P.B., Exotic emerging viral diseases: progress and challenges. (supplement review). Nat Med., 2004;10(12):S110–S121.

Greenwood B.M., Bojang K., Whitty C.J., Targett G.A. Malaria. Lancet. 2005;365:1487–1498.

Gryseels B., Polman K., Clerinx J., Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006;368:1106–1118.

Health Protection Agency. The Agency website has detailed information and links to common travel associated infections. Available online at: www.hpa.org.uk/ (accessed November 2011)

Jefferson T., Demicheli V., Rivetti D., et al. Antivirals for influenza in healthy adults: systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367:303–313.

Kremsner P.G., Krishna S. Antimalarial combinations. Lancet. 2004;364:285–294.

Lalloo D.G., Shingadia D., Pasvol G., et al. UK malaria treatment guidelines. J. Infect.. 2007;54:111–121.

HIV and AIDS. Lever A.M.L., Aliyu S.H., eds., Medicine Journal. 2009;37(7):313–390.

McManus D.P., Zhang W., Li J., Bartley P.B. Echinococcosis. Lancet. 2003;362:1295–1304.

Merson M.H. The HIV-AIDS pandemic at 25 – the global response. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2006;354(23):2414–2417.

Montoya J.G., Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1965–1976.

Moscona A. Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2005;353(13):1361–1373.

Murray H.W., Berman J.D., Davies C.R., Saravia N.G. Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2005;366:1561–1577.

Patterson T.F. Advances and challenges in management of invasive mycoses. Lancet. 2005;366:1013–1025.

Sepkowitz K.A. One disease, two epidemics – AIDS at 25. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2006;354(23):2411–2414.

Snow R.W., Marsh K. Malaria in Africa: progress and prospects in the decade since the Abuja Declaration. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):137–139.

University of Liverpool. interactive charts on antiretroviral drug interactions, information about advances in therapeutic drug monitoring and other resources. Available online at: http://www.hiv-druginteractions.org (accessed November 2011)

US Department of Health and Human Services. guidelines on use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents, and children, which are updated several times per year. Available online at: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov (accessed November 2011)

World Health Organization. data on HIV infection. Available online at: http://www.who.int/topics/hiv_infections/en/ (accessed November 2011)

World Health Organization. guidelines for the treatment of malaria http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241547925/en/index.html, 2010. (accessed November 2011)

1 The large-scale screening for natural compounds able to kill bacteria in vitro, which was the basis for the boom of antibiotics in the 1950s, was not successful for antivirals … The driving force for the boom of antivirals in this period has been the pressure to contain the HIV pandemic, combined with the increased understanding of the molecular mechanisms … which has allowed the identification of new targets for therapeutic intervention.’ (Rappuoli R 2004 From Pasteur to genomics: progress and challenges in infectious diseases. Nature Medicine 10:1177–1185.)

2 For a comprehensive review, see Kaplan J E, Benson C, Holmes K H et al 2009 Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 58(RR-4):1–207.

3 Treatment regimens vary in detail; those quoted here accord with the recommendations in the British National Formulary 2010 and national UK specialist guidelines; the BNF is a good source of contact numbers, addresses and websites to obtain expert advice on therapy and prophylaxis of malaria.

4 Acceptable as quinine hydrochloride, dihydrochloride or sulfate, but not quinine bisulfate, which contains less quinine.

5 The loading dose should not be given if the patient has received quinine, quinidine or mefloquine in the previous 24 h; see also warnings about halofantrine (below).

6 Reduced to 5–7 mg/kg of quinine salt if the infusion lasts for more than 48 h.

7 A Cochrane Review of six clinical trials showed a significantly reduced risk of death, reduced parasite clearance time and hypoglycaemia when artesunate was compared with quinine for the treatment of severe malaria. Jones K L, Donegan S, Lalloo D G 2007 Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria. Cochrane Database Systematic Review Oct 17;(4):CD005967.

8 Dondorp A, Nosten F, Stepniewska K, et al 2005 Artesunate versus quinine for treatment of severe falciparum malaria: a randomised trial. Lancet 366:717–725.

9 The active component of many drugs, whether acid or base, is relatively insoluble and may present a problem in formulation. This is overcome by adding an acid to a base or vice versa; the weight of the salt differs according to the acid or base component, i.e. chloroquine base 150 mg = chloroquine sulfate 200 mg = chloroquine phosphate 250 mg (approximately). Where there may be variation, therefore, the amount of drug prescribed is expressed as the weight of the active component, in the case of chloroquine, the base.

10 Report 1993 Chloroquine poisoning. Lancet 307:49.