Ventricular Conduction Disturbances: Bundle Branch Blocks and Related Abnormalities

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2882 times

Chapter 7 Ventricular Conduction Disturbances Bundle Branch Blocks and Related Abnormalities

Please go to expertconsult.com for supplemental chapter material.

Recall that in the normal process of ventricular activation the electrical stimulus reaches the ventricles from the atria by way of the atrioventricular (AV) node and His-Purkinje system (see Chapters 1 and 4). The first part of the ventricles to be stimulated (depolarized) is the left side of the ventricular septum. Soon after, the depolarization spreads to the main mass of the left and right ventricles by way of the left and right bundle branches. Normally the entire process of ventricular depolarization in adults is completed within about 0.1 sec (100 msec). This is the reason the normal width of the QRS complex (measured by computer) from all 12 leads is less than or equal to 110 msec (about 2.5 small boxes on the ECG graph paper by eye). Any process that interferes with the physiologic, near simultaneous stimulation of the ventricles may prolong the QRS width or change the QRS axis. This chapter primarily focuses on a major topic: the effects that blocks or delays within the bundle branch system have on the QRS complex and ST-T waves.

Right Bundle Branch Block

Consider, first, the effect of cutting the right bundle branch, or markedly slowing conduction in this structure. Obviously, right ventricular stimulation will be delayed and the QRS complex will be widened. The shape of the QRS with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) can be predicted on the basis of some familiar principles.

Normally the first part of the ventricles to be depolarized is the interventricular septum (see Fig. 4-6A). The left side of the septum is stimulated first (by a branch of the left bundle). On the normal ECG, this septal depolarization produces a small septal r wave in lead V1 and a small septal q wave in lead V6 (Fig. 7-1A). Clearly, RBBB should not affect the septal phase of ventricular stimulation because the septum is stimulated by a part of the left bundle.

The second phase of ventricular stimulation is the simultaneous depolarization of the left and right ventricles (see Fig. 4-6B). RBBB should not affect this phase either, because the left ventricle is normally electrically predominant, producing deep S waves in the right chest leads and tall R waves in the left chest leads (Fig. 7-1B). The change in the QRS complex produced by RBBB is a result of the delay in the total time needed for stimulation of the right ventricle. This means that after the left ventricle has completely depolarized, the right ventricle continues to depolarize.

This delayed right ventricular depolarization produces a third phase of ventricular stimulation. The electrical voltages in the third phase are directed to the right, reflecting the delayed depolarization and slow spread of the depolarization wave outward through the right ventricle. Therefore, a lead placed over the right side of the chest (e.g., lead V1) records this phase of ventricular stimulation as a positive wide deflection (R′ wave). The rightward spread of the delayed and slow right ventricular depolarization voltages produces a wide negative (S wave) deflection in the left chest leads (e.g., lead V6) (Fig. 7-1C).

Based on an understanding of this step-by-step process, the pattern seen in the chest leads with RBBB can be derived. With RBBB, lead V1 typically shows an rSR′ complex with a broad R′ wave. Lead V6 shows a qRS-type complex with a broad S wave. The tall wide R wave in the right chest leads and the deep terminal S wave in the left chest leads represent the same event viewed from opposite sides of the chest—the slow spread of delayed depolarization voltages through the right ventricle.

To make the initial diagnosis of RBBB, look at leads V1 and V6 in particular. The characteristic appearance of QRS complexes in these leads makes the diagnosis simple. (Fig. 7-1 shows how the delay in ventricular depolarization with RBBB produces the characteristic ECG patterns.)

In summary, the ventricular stimulation process in RBBB can be divided into three phases. The first two phases are normal septal and left ventricular depolarization. The third phase is delayed stimulation of the right ventricle. These three phases of ventricular stimulation with RBBB are represented on the ECG by the triphasic complexes seen in the chest leads:

With an RBBB pattern the QRS complex in lead V1 generally shows an rSR′ pattern (Fig. 7-2). Occasionally, however, the S wave never quite makes its way below the baseline. Consequently, the complex in lead V1 has the appearance of a large notched R wave (Fig. 7-3).

Figures 7-2 and 7-3 are typical examples of RBBB. Do you notice anything abnormal about the ST-T complexes in these tracings? If you look carefully, you can see that the T waves in the right chest leads are inverted. T wave inversions in the right chest leads are a characteristic finding with RBBB. These inversions are referred to as secondary changes because they reflect just the delay in ventricular stimulation. By contrast, primary T wave abnormalities reflect an actual change in repolarization, independent of any QRS change. Examples of primary T wave abnormalities include T wave inversions resulting from ischemia (see Chapters 8 and 9), hypokalemia and certain other electrolyte abnormalities (see Chapter 10), and drugs such as digitalis (see Chapter 10).

Some ECGs show both primary and secondary ST-T changes. In Figure 7-3 the T wave inversions in leads V1 to V3 and leads II, III, and aVF can be explained solely on the basis of the RBBB because the inversions occur in leads with an rSR′-type complex. However, the T wave inversions or ST segment depressions in other leads (V4 and V5) represent a primary change, perhaps resulting from ischemia or a drug effect.

Clinical Significance

RBBB may be caused by a number of factors. First, some people have this finding without any identifiable underlying heart disorder. Therefore RBBB, itself, is an isolated ECG abnormality in many people; however, RBBB may be associated with organic heart disease. It may occur with virtually any condition that affects the right side of the heart, including atrial septal defect with left-to-right shunting of blood, chronic pulmonary disease with pulmonary artery hypertension, and valvular lesions such as pulmonary stenosis, as well as cardiomyopathies and coronary disease. In some people (particularly older individuals), RBBB is related to chronic degenerative changes in the conduction system. It may occur after cardiac surgery.

Pulmonary embolism, which produces acute right-sided heart overload, may cause a right ventricular conduction delay, usually associated with sinus tachycardia.

By itself, RBBB does not require any specific treatment. RBBB may be permanent or transient. Sometimes it appears only when the heart rate exceeds a certain critical value (rate-related RBBB), a nondiagnostic finding. However, as noted later in patients with acute anterior wall infarction, a new RBBB may indicate an increased risk of complete heart block, particularly when the RBBB is associated with left anterior or posterior fascicular block and a prolonged PR interval. A new RBBB with acute ST segment elevation anterior myocardial infarction (MI) is also a marker of more extensive myocardial damage, often associated with heart failure or even cardiogenic shock (see Chapter 8, Fig. 8-20).

A pattern resembling RBBB (“pseudo-RBBB”) is characteristic of the Brugada pattern, important because it may be associated with increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (see Chapter 19; Fig. 19-9).

Note: An rSr′ pattern with a narrow QRS duration (100 msec or less) and a very small (≤ 1-2 mm) terminal r′ wave in V1 or V1-V2 is a common normal variant and should not be over-read as an incomplete right ventricular branch block.

Left Bundle Branch Block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) also produces a pattern with a widened QRS complex. However, the QRS complex with LBBB is very different from that with RBBB. The major reason for this difference is that RBBB affects mainly the terminal phase of ventricular activation, whereas LBBB also affects the early phase.

Recall that, normally, the first phase of ventricular stimulation—depolarization of the left side of the septum—is started by a branch of the left bundle. LBBB therefore blocks this normal pattern. When LBBB is present, the septum depolarizes from right to left and not from left to right. Thus, the first major ECG change produced by LBBB is a loss of the normal septal r wave in lead V1 and the normal septal q wave in lead V6 (Fig. 7-4A). Furthermore, the total time for left ventricular depolarization is prolonged with LBBB. As a result, the QRS complex is abnormally wide. Lead V6 shows a wide, entirely positive (R) wave (Fig. 7-4B). The right chest leads (e.g., V1) record a negative QRS (QS) complex because the left ventricle is still electrically predominant with LBBB and therefore produces greater voltages than the right ventricle.

Thus, with LBBB the entire process of ventricular stimulation is oriented toward the left chest leads; that is, the septum depolarizes from right to left, and stimulation of the electrically predominant left ventricle is prolonged. Figure 7-4 illustrates the sequence of ventricular activation in LBBB.

With LBBB, the QS wave in lead V1 sometimes shows a small notching at its point, giving the wave a characteristic W shape. Similarly, the broad R wave in lead V6 may show a notching at its peak, giving it a distinctive M shape. (An example of an LBBB pattern is presented in Fig. 7-5.)

Just as secondary T wave inversions occur with RBBB, they also occur with LBBB. As Figure 7-5 shows, the T waves in the leads with tall R waves (e.g., the left precordial leads) are inverted; this is characteristic of LBBB. However, T wave inversions in the right precordial leads cannot be explained solely on the basis of LBBB. If present, these T wave inversions reflect some primary abnormality such as ischemia (see Fig. 8-21).

In summary, the diagnosis of complete LBBB pattern can be made simply by inspection of leads V1 and V6:

You should have no problem differentiating LBBB and RBBB patterns (Fig. 7-6). Occasionally an ECG shows wide QRS complexes that are not typical of an RBBB or LBBB pattern. In such cases the general term intraventricular delay is used (Fig. 7-7).

Clinical Significance

Unlike RBBB, which is occasionally seen without evident cardiac disease, LBBB is usually a sign of organic heart disease. LBBB may develop in patients with long-standing hypertensive heart disease, a valvular lesion (e.g., calcification of the mitral annulus, aortic stenosis, or aortic regurgitation), or different types of cardiomyopathy (see Chapter 11). It is also seen in patients with coronary artery disease and often correlates with impaired left ventricular function. Most patients with LBBB have underlying left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (see Chapter 6). Degenerative changes in the conduction system may lead to LBBB, particularly in the elderly, as may cardiac surgery. Often, more than one contributing factor may be identified (e.g., hypertension and coronary artery disease). Rarely, otherwise normal individuals have an LBBB pattern without evidence of organic heart disease by examination or even invasive studies. Echocardiograms usually show septal dyssynchrony due to abnormal ventricular activation patterns; other findings (e.g., valvular abnormalities, LVH, and diffuse wall motion disorders due to cardiomyopathy) are not unusual.

LBBB, like RBBB, may be permanent or transient. It also may appear only when the heart rate exceeds a certain critical value (rate- or acceleration-dependent LBBB). Less commonly, LBBB occurs only when the heart decelerates below some critical value.

Finally, LBBB may not only be a marker of major underlying cardiac disease, but the loss of ventricular synchrony (dyssynchrony syndrome) induced by this conduction abnormality may, itself, worsen cardiac function, especially in those with advanced heart disease. The use of biventricular pacemaker therapy to resynchronize ventricular contraction in patients with LBBB and heart failure is described in Chapter 21.

Differential Diagnosis of Bundle Branch Blocks

Wide QRS resembling bundle branch blocks can be seen in several other situations:

1. Pacemaker rhythms: Right ventricular pacing functionally is similar to LBBB because the ventricles are activated from the electrode positioned in the right ventricular apex (close to the RBB where ventricular activation in the LBBB starts; see Figs. 21-3 and 21-5. Biventricular pacing sometimes resembles RBBB because of the left ventricular lead activating the heart from back to front (toward lead V1) producing RV1 similar to RBBB.

2. LVH: Dilatation and especially thickening of the LV wall delays its activation and prolongs QRS duration even without associated conduction abnormalities. QRS pattern in LVH can be very similar to LBBB, including increased QRS voltage and secondary T wave discordance. However, in contrast to LVH, LBBB is characterized by prolonged intrinsicoid deflection (time from the QRS onset to the peak of the R wave in leads V5-V6) to over 60 msec (1.5 small boxes). Often, LVH pattern progresses to incomplete and then to complete LBBB.

3. Ventricular preexcitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White [WPW] syndrome) can create ECG patterns similar to bundle branch blocks. Based on the principles outlined previously, left ventricular preexcitation (formerly called WPW type A) produces a positive R wave in lead V1 (RV is activated last), whereas right ventricular preexcitation (formerly WPW type B) creates deep S waves in lead V1 similar to that seen in LBBB because the right ventricle is activated first. The clue to the presence of preexcitation is a short PR interval and a very slow inscription of the initial part of the QRS (delta wave).

4. Ventricular arrhythmias (especially at slower rates) can look very similar to bundle branch blocks. More on the differential diagnosis of wide QRS rhythms is presented in Chapter 20.

Fascicular Blocks (Hemiblocks)

Fascicular blocks, or hemiblocks, are a slightly more complex but important topic. To this point the left bundle branch system has been described as if it were a single pathway. Actually this system has been known for many years to be subdivided into an anterior fascicle and a posterior fascicle (“fascicle” is derived from the Latin fasciculus, meaning “small bundle”). The right bundle branch, by contrast, is a single pathway and consists of just one main fascicle or bundle. This revised concept of the bundle branch system as a trifascicular highway (one right lane and two left lanes) is illustrated in Figure 7-8. More realistically, the trifascicular concept is also an oversimplification: the fascicles themselves are more like a ramifying fan than single pathways.

It makes sense to predict that a block can occur at any single point or at multiple points in this trifascicular system. The ECG pattern with RBBB has already been presented (see Figs. 7-2 and 7-3). The pattern of LBBB can occur in one of two ways: by a block in the left main bundle before it divides or by blocks in both subdivisions (anterior and posterior fascicles).

What happens if a block occurs in just the anterior or just the posterior fascicle of the left bundle? A block in either fascicle of the left bundle branch system is called a hemiblock or fascicular block. Recognition of hemiblocks on the ECG is intimately related to the subject of axis deviation (see Chapter 5). Somewhat surprisingly, a hemiblock (unlike a full LBBB or RBBB) does not widen the QRS complex markedly. Experiments and clinical observations have shown that the main effect of cutting these fascicles is a change in the QRS axis, with only minor increases in QRS duration. Specifically, left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) results in marked left axis deviation (about –45° or more negative); left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) produces marked right axis deviation (RAD) (about +120° or more positive).

In summary, fascicular blocks are partial blocks in the left bundle branch system, involving either the anterior or posterior subdivisions. The diagnosis of a fascicular block is made primarily from the mean QRS axis in the extremity (frontal plane) leads. This is in contrast to the diagnosis of complete (or incomplete) RBBB or LBBB, which is made primarily from the distinctive wide QRS patterns in the chest (horizontal plane) leads.

Complete bundle branch blocks, unlike fascicular blocks (hemiblocks), do not cause a characteristic shift in the mean QRS axis. In contrast, LAFB shifts the QRS axis to the left by delaying activation of the more superior and leftward portions of the left ventricle. LPFB shifts it inferiorly and to the right by delaying activation of the more inferior and rightward portions of the left ventricle. In both cases the QRS axis therefore is shifted toward the direction of delayed activation.

Left Anterior Fascicular Block

Isolated (pure) LAFB is diagnosed by finding a mean QRS axis of −45° or more and a QRS width of less than 0.12 sec. As rough but useful rule of thumb: A mean QRS axis of −45° or more can be easily recognized because the depth of the S wave in lead III is 1.4 or more times the height of the R wave in lead I or the depth of the S in aVF is equal to or greater than the height of the R wave in lead I (Fig. 7-9). Lead aVL usually shows a qR complex, with rS complexes in leads II, III, and aVF (or QS waves if an inferior MI is also present).

In general, the finding of isolated LAFB is a very common, nonspecific abnormality. This finding may be seen with hypertension, aortic valve disease, coronary disease, and aging and sometimes without identifiable cause (Fig. 7-10).

Bifascicular and Trifascicular Blocks

Bifascicular block indicates blockage of any two of the three fascicles. For example, RBBB with LAFB produces an RBBB pattern with marked LAD (see Fig. 7-10); RBBB with LPFB (Fig. 7-10) produces an RBBB pattern with RAD (provided other causes of RAD, especially RVH and lateral MI, are excluded). Similarly, a complete LBBB may indicate blockage of both the anterior and posterior fascicles.

Bifascicular blocks are potentially significant because they make ventricular conduction dependent on the single remaining fascicle. Additional damage to this third remaining fascicle may completely block AV conduction, producing complete heart block (trifascicular block).

The acute development of new bifascicular block, usually RBBB and LAFB (especially with a prolonged PR interval) during an acute anterior wall MI (see Chapters 8 and 9) may be an important warning signal of impending complete heart block and is considered by some an indication for a temporary pacemaker. However, chronic bifascicular blocks with normal sinus rhythm have a low rate of progression to complete heart block and are not indications by themselves for permanent pacemakers.

Many asymptomatic people have ECGs resembling the one in Figure 7-10 showing RBBB with left axis deviation due to LAFB. Patients with chronic bifascicular block of this kind do not generally require a permanent pacemaker unless they develop second- or third-degree AV block.

As noted, the risk of complete heart block in asymptomatic patients with chronic bifascicular block is relatively low. By contrast, patients with acute anterior MI in whom bifascicular block suddenly occurs have a poor prognosis because of underlying extensive myocardial necrosis, and they are also at higher risk of developing complete heart block abruptly.

Trifascicular block with 1:1 AV conduction is rarely present on an ECG. How can one infer trifascicular block from a 12-lead ECG without sustained or intermittent complete or advanced AV block? The answer is that sometimes patients will display alternating bundle branch block (RBBB and LBBB). Rarely, this type of alternation may occur, on a beat-to-beat basis (be careful not to mistake ventricular bigeminy for this!), or at different times during more prolonged monitoring. Permanent pacemaker implantation (Chapter 21) is indicated for alternating LBBB and RBBB (trifascicular block) because of the high risk of abrupt complete heart block.

Caution: A very common misconception is that bifascicular block (especially RBBB and LAFB) with a prolonged PR interval is diagnostic of trifascicular disease. This assumption is not correct. Indeed, a very long PR interval with RBBB and left axis deviation is more likely to indicate AV node disease in concert with bifascicular block. However, trifascicular disease cannot be inferred on the basis of this combination.