Vector-Borne Diseases

Published on 09/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2942 times

Vector-Borne Diseases

Learning Objectives

At the conclusion of this chapter, the reader should be able to:

• Describe the etiology, epidemiology, and signs and symptoms of Lyme disease.

• Analyze the immunologic manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of Lyme disease.

• Explain the principle, interpretation, and limitations of an antibody detection assay.

• Describe prevention strategies of Lyme disease.

• Summarize the etiology, epidemiology, and signs and symptoms of ehrlichiosis.

• Analyze the immunologic manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of ehrlichiosis.

• Explain the prevention of ehrlichiosis.

• Summarize the etiology, epidemiology, and signs and symptoms of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

• Analyze the immunologic manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

• Explain the prevention of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

• Summarize the etiology, epidemiology, and signs and symptoms of babesiosis.

• Analyze the immunologic manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of babesiosis.

• Explain the prevention of babesiosis.

• Briefly discuss the etiology and laboratory diagnosis of West Nile virus infection.

• Analyze case studies related to the immune response in Lyme disease, Ehrlichiosis, and Babesiosis.

• Correctly answer case study related multiple choice questions.

• Be prepared to participate in a discussion of critical thinking questions.

• Describe the principle, limitations, and clinical applications of the rapid Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection assay.

• Correctly answer end of chapter review questions.

Globalization has made the world a more connected place. Bacterial and viral diseases transmitted by mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas continue to be an ever-present threat worldwide (Table 19-1). Some of these diseases have been present in the United States for a long time but others have emerged recently. These include some of the world’s most destructive diseases, many of which are increasing threats to human health as the environment changes and globalization increases.

Table 19-1

Examples of Vector-Borne Diseases

Vector Disease Pathogen Distribution
Mosquitoes      
Aedes triseriatus California encephalitis Virus United States: Upper Midwest, Appalachian region
Aedes aegypti Dengue fever
West Nile encephalitis
West Nile fever
Virus
Virus
Worldwide: tropical regions
United States; spreading nationwide
Africa, Asia
Culiseta melanura Eastern equine encephalitis Virus Eastern United States
Central and South America, Caribbean
Culex spp. St. Louis encephalitis
Western equine encephalitis
Virus
Virus
Eastern United States
Central and South America
Western United States
Central and South America
Ticks      
Deer tick, Ixodes spp. Anaplasmosis (formerly human granulocytic ehrlichiosis) Bacteria Worldwide; Europe
United States—Northeast, Upper Midwest, northern California
I. scapularis Babesiosis Protozoan parasite United States—primarily northeastern states, rarely Pacific states
Lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum Human monocytic ehrlichiosis Bacteria United States—Southeast, south central states
Dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus Mediterranean spotted fever Bacteria Europe, Africa, Central Asia
Tickborne, airborne vector Q fever Rickettsiae Worldwide
Dog tick, wood tick, Dermacentor spp. Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Tick-associated rash, illness
Bacteria
Bacteria
North and South America
Southern
Ticks, various Tickborne relapsing fever Bacteria Western United States (endemic); Southern British Columbia; plateau regions of Mexico; Central and South America; Mediterranean, Central Asia, and much of Africa
Lice, Fleas, Mites      
Human body louse; squirrel flea and louse Epidemic typhus Rickettsiae United States, eastern
Rat flea, Xenopsylla cheopis Murine typhus Bacteria Worldwide, where rats are abundant
Cat or dog fleas Murine typhus–like febrile disease Rickettsiae Worldwide
Mites (chiggers) Scrub typhus Rickettsiae South Asia to Australia, East Asia in recently disturbed habitat (e.g., forest clearings or other persisting mite foci infested with rats and other rodents)
Human body louse Louse-borne relapsing fever
Trench fever
Bacteria
Rickettsiae
Africa
Industrialized countries

image

Most recent cases and outbreaks have occurred in rustic cabins at higher elevations (≥8000 ft) in coniferous forests in the western United States.

The discovery and surveillance of many of these vector-borne diseases (e.g., Lyme disease) can be accomplished by serologic testing. Travelers and military personnel may be at risk for exposure to vector-borne disease if they engage in activities that bring them into contact with habitats that support the vectors or the animal reservoir species associated with these diseases.

Some of the newly emerging infectious diseases in the United States include the following:

A few prominent examples of the more commonly occurring vector-borne diseases detectable by serologic methods are presented in this chapter.

Lyme Disease

Etiology

Lyme disease (Lyme borreliosis) is caused by a spirochete bacterium. It is a cutaneous systemic infection generally transmitted by a hard-bodied tick (Fig. 19-1) and caused by Borrelia burgdorferi (Fig. 19-2). The causative agent of Lyme borreliosis currently consists of three pathogenic species—B. burgdorferi, Borrelia afzelii, and Borrelia garinii. Only B. burgdorferi strains have been found in the United States. In contrast, most of the illness in Europe is caused by B. afzelii, which is associated with the chronic skin condition acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA), and B. garinii, which is associated with neurologic symptoms. Only these two species have been found in Asia. The complete genome of B. burgdorferi (strain B31) has now been sequenced.

The spirochete is transmitted by certain ixodid ticks that are part of the Ixodes ricinus complex. These include Ixodes scapularis (formerly classified as Ixodes dammini) in the northeastern and Midwestern United States, Ixodes pacificus in the western United States, Ixodes ricinus in Europe, and Ixodes persulcatus in Asia. The vector has not been identified in Australia. Ixodid ticks are also indigenous to Africa and South America. The lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, does not transmit Lyme disease.

In the United States, the preferred host for larval and nymphal stages of I. scapularis is the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. White-tailed deer, which are not involved in the life cycle of the spirochete, are the preferred host for the I. scapularis adult stage and they seem to be critical to tick survival. Ixodid ticks have also been found on at least 30 types of wild animals and 49 species of birds. Illness is not known to develop in wild animals, but clinical Lyme disease does occur in domestic animals, including dogs, horses, and cattle.

Spirochetes are transmitted from the gut of the tick to human skin at the site of a bite and then migrate outwardly into the skin. This migration causes the unique expanding skin lesion, erythema migrans (EM). Subsequent dissemination of spirochetes to secondary sites may cause major organ system involvement in humans. In dogs, the most common symptom is arthritis.

Epidemiology

Currently, Lyme disease is a global illness. Cases have been reported on all continents except Antarctica. Since its original description more than 25 years ago, Lyme disease has become the most commonly reported (95%) vector-borne illness in the United States. This infection has emerged as a major health hazard for human beings and domestic animals. In 2011, it was the sixth most common nationally notifiable disease. It is endemic in more than 15 states in the United States and in Europe and Asia.

In some patients, Lyme disease may be transitory and of little consequence, but in others it may become chronic and severely disabling. Accurate diagnosis is therefore essential, although better laboratory techniques are still needed.

Retrospectively, the first symptom of Lyme disease apparently was recognized as early as 1908 in Sweden. In the decades that followed, the rash produced by the disease erythema chronicum migrans (ECM) was noted elsewhere in Europe, as were other symptoms that seemed to follow ECM’s eruption. Secondary symptoms, such as impairment of the nervous system, were described in France, Germany, and again in Sweden.

In the United States the European rash was almost unknown until 1969, when a case of a physician bitten by a tick while hunting in Wisconsin was reported. Although a few ECM cases were seen in Americans who had traveled to Europe, there were no further native American cases until 1975, when physicians at the U.S. Navy base in Groton, Connecticut, reported seeing four patients with a rash similar to that of ECM. At the same time, an epidemiologist at the Connecticut State Department of Health and a rheumatologist at Yale University were notified of an unusual cluster of cases of arthritis occurring in children in Lyme, Connecticut.

It was not until 1982 that Burgdorfer and Barbour isolated a previously unrecognized spirochete, now called B. burgdorferi, from I. scapularis ticks, and Lyme disease became a recognized vector-borne, infectious disease. Two factors influence the chance that a bitten patient will contract the disease, the likelihood that local ixodid ticks carry the Lyme spirochete and the likelihood of infection after a bite by an infected tick. The probability of infection after an ixodid tick bite in an area of endemic disease is about 3%, but varies in different regions from less than 1% to as high as 5%. It has been suggested that human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–DR4 (HLA-DR4) and, secondarily, HLA-DR2, may increase the risk that Lyme arthritis will become chronic and fail to respond to antibiotics.

Lyme disease does not occur nationwide and is concentrated heavily in the northeast and upper midwest. The highest number of confirmed cases of Lyme disease to date was 29,959 in 2009 (Fig. 19-3). Persons of all ages and both genders are equally susceptible. In 2011, 96% of Lyme disease cases were reported from 13 states (Fig. 19-4):

Lyme disease is considered an emerging infectious disease because of the impact of changing environmental and socioeconomic factors, such as the transformation of farmland into suburban woodlots favorable for deer and deer ticks. Although pets may represent a spirochete reservoir, it is unlikely that humans can be infected directly by them. In areas of endemic Lyme disease, however, both adult and nymphal ticks, carried into the household by dogs and cats, may infect humans.

Signs and Symptoms

The basic features of Lyme disease are similar worldwide, but there are regional variations, primarily between the illness in America and that in Europe and Asia. In at least 60% to 80% of U.S. patients, Lyme disease begins with a slowly expanding skin lesion, EM, which occurs at the site of the tick bite. The skin lesion is frequently accompanied by flulike symptoms.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical case definition for Lyme disease includes the presence of EM or at least one objective, late manifesting sign of musculoskeletal, neurologic, or cardiovascular disease and a positive serologic test for antibodies to B. burgdorferi. Many misdiagnosed patients actually have chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia, both of which can cause similar symptoms, such as joint stiffness or pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance.

Lyme borreliosis is a multisystem illness that primarily involves the skin, nervous system, heart, and joints (Table 19-2). Lyme disease usually begins during the summer months with EM and flulike symptoms and may be accompanied by right upper quadrant tenderness and a mild hepatitis (stage 1). This stage is followed weeks to months later by acute cardiac or neurologic disease in a minority of untreated individuals (stage 2) and then by arthritis and chronic neurologic disease (stage 3) in many untreated patients weeks to years after disease onset. There is considerable overlap of these stages, but Lyme disease is best characterized as an illness that evolves from early to late disease without reference to an arbitrary staging system. However, a patient may have one or all of the stages, and the infection may not become symptomatic until stage 2 or 3. Most affected patients have EM and 25% manifest arthritis; neurologic manifestations and cardiac involvement are uncommon.

Table 19-2

Clinical Features of Lyme Disease

Stage Duration Signs and Symptoms
I 4 wk (median) after injection Cutaneous manifestations (erythema migrans) or other skin eruptions, flulike syndrome, neurologic symptoms
II Follows a variable latent period Target organs and systems include nervous system, heart, eyes, and skin, all of which can manifest abnormalities
III Weeks to years after infection Arthritis, late neurologic complications, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans

Arthritis

Arthralgia and myalgia are common features of early Lyme disease, but frank arthritis during EM is unusual. Arthritis is a well-described complication of Lyme disease and characteristically occurs months to years after Borrelia infection. Therefore, cases of Lyme arthritis occur during every month of the year. Lyme arthritis and parvovirus B19 arthritis can occur in the absence of other symptoms, such as the characteristic rash. Some suspected cases of Lyme arthritis might be caused by parvovirus B19, particularly those occurring during the parvovirus B19 season.

Arthritis in patients with chronic Lyme disease may be associated with a long-standing infiltration of the joints by B. burgdorferi spirochetes, along with a local inflammatory response. It may not be triggered simply by the presence of circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against outer surface proteins.

Cutaneous Manifestations

Cutaneous manifestations can be demonstrated as early ECM (Fig. 19-5), secondary lesions (disseminated lesions and lymphocytoma), and late lesions (ACA). Except for the late lesions, cutaneous manifestations generally resolve spontaneously over weeks to months. The red papule at the site of the tick bite is most often located on the thigh, groin, or axilla. Facial EM is seen more frequently in children.

Several days to weeks after the onset of EM, almost 50% of untreated patients develop secondary skin lesions. A rare early manifestation of Lyme disease is Borrelia lymphocytoma, a violaceous, tumor-like swelling or nodule at the base of the earlobe or nipple caused by a dense lymphocytic infiltrate of the dermis. This lesion occurs at the site of a tick bite and in conjunction with other symptoms; it may be confused with lymphoma.

ACA is a late skin manifestation of Lyme disease more prevalent in Europe than in the United States. Lesions display bluish red discoloration, doughy swelling, and fibrotic nodules. Eventually, striking atrophy of the skin and subcutaneous tissues follows. Polyneuropathy coexists in 30% to 45% of patients.

Cardiac Manifestations

Lyme carditis occurs in approximately 8% of untreated patients within 1 to 2 months (range, >1 week to 7 months) after the onset of infection and may be the initial manifestation of Lyme disease. Cardiac features of Lyme disease usually result in a fluctuating degree of atrioventricular conduction defects (first-degree, second-degree, and complete block, as well as bundle branch and fascicular blocks) or tachyarrhythmias. Myopericarditis can occur, but symptomatic congestive heart failure is uncommon. Patients usually develop signs of lightheadedness, syncope, dyspnea, palpitations, and chest pain. Symptoms are more common in patients with more severe degrees of heart block. The carditis usually follows a self-limited and mild course, but temporary pacing may be needed in a small percentage of patients.

Neurologic Manifestations

Neurologic abnormalities occur in approximately 15% of untreated patients. These are usually observed 2 to 8 weeks after disease onset and may include aseptic meningitis, cranial nerve palsies, peripheral radiculoneuritis, and peripheral neuropathy. The predominant symptoms of Lyme meningitis are severe headache and mild neck stiffness, which may fluctuate for weeks after a post-EM latent period.

Months to years after the initial infection with B. burgdorferi, patients with Lyme disease may have chronic encephalopathy, polyneuropathy or, less often, leukoencephalitis. The appearance of mild encephalopathy has been seen 1 month to 14 years after the onset of disease. Encephalopathy is characterized by memory loss, mood changes, or sleep disturbances. In addition, increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels and evidence of intrathecal production of antibody to B. burgdorferi may occur. Chronic neurologic manifestations can also include polyneuropathy with radicular pain or distal paresthesias, fatigue, headache, hearing loss, and verbal memory impairment. These chronic neurologic abnormalities usually improve with antibiotic therapy.

Ocular manifestations may occur in Lyme disease and include cranial nerve palsies, optic neuritis, panophthalmitis with loss of vision, and choroiditis with retinal detachment.

Immunologic Manifestations

Cellular immune responses to B. burgdorferi antigens begin concurrent with early clinical illness. An increase in spontaneous suppressor cell activity and reduction in natural killer (NK) cell activity have been noted. Mononuclear cell, antigen-specific responses develop during spirochetal dissemination and humoral (antibody) immune responses soon follow.

Serodiagnostic tests are insensitive during the first several weeks of infection. In the United States, approximately 20% to 30% of Lyme patients have positive responses, usually of the IgM isotype, during this period, but by convalescence 2 to 4 weeks later, about 70% to 80% have seroreactivity even after antibiotic treatment. After about 1 month, most patients with an active infection have IgG antibody responses. After antibiotic treatment, antibody titers slowly fall, but IgG and even IgM responses may persist for many years after treatment. An IgM response cannot be interpreted as a manifestation of recent infection or reinfection unless the appropriate clinical characteristics are present. Antibodies formed include cryoglobulins, immune complexes, antibodies specific for B. burgdorferi, and anticardiolipin antibodies. Elevated titers of IgM are noted in early disease. Immunoblot analysis demonstrates that IgM antibodies form initially against the flagellar 41-kilodalton (kDa) polypeptide, but react later to additional cell wall antigens. An overlapping IgG response to these antigens develops in some individuals. These antigen-specific cellular and humoral responses are not known to eradicate infection in early disease or participate in disease pathogenesis.

Specific IgM or IgG antibodies against B. burgdorferi are usually not detectable in a patient’s serum unless symptoms have been present for at least 2 to 4 weeks. In cases of Lyme arthritis, tests for serum antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test results are generally negative. However, anti–B. burgdorferi antibodies of the IgG type should be present in the serum of patients with Lyme arthritis.

Outer surface protein A antibodies develop late in the course of human Lyme infection and then only in a subset of patients. A temporal association may exist between the onset of chronic Lyme arthritis in four patients who were HLA-DR4–positive and the development of antibodies to the outer surface protein.

Persistent organisms and spirochetal antigen deposits elicit a vigorous immune reaction, as manifested by a tissue-rich plasma cell and lymphocytic exudate containing abundant T cells, predominantly of the helper subset, plus IgD-bearing B cells. B. burgdorferi antigens elicit a strong immune reaction that intensifies with chronicity of arthritis and stimulates macrophages to secrete interleukin-1 (IL-1). IL-1 is capable of stimulating synovial cells and fibroblasts to secrete collagenase and prostaglandin E2; levels of both are elevated in Lyme synovial fluid and can cause erosion of joint cartilage and bone.

Diagnostic Evaluation

The culture of B. burgdorferi from specimens in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly medium permits a definitive diagnosis. With a few exceptions, positive cultures have only been obtained early in the illness, primarily from biopsy samples of EM lesions, less often from plasma samples, and only occasionally from CSF samples in patients with meningitis. Later in the infection, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is superior to culture for the detection of B. burgdorferi in joint fluid.

In the United States, the diagnosis is usually based on the recognition of the characteristic clinical findings, a history of exposure in an area in which the disease is endemic and, except in patients with EM, an antibody response to B. burgdorferi. In more than 50% of cases, physicians are comfortable making the diagnosis based on symptoms and patient history. Testing becomes important when the telltale bull’s eye rash or other symptoms characteristic of Lyme disease do not appear (Table 19-3).

Table 19-3

Methods of Lyme Disease Detection

Method Comments
Isolation Successful cultures have been obtained from ticks, skin biopsies, ear punches, CSF, blood, and synovial fluid; blood is not a reliable sample for culture. Isolation of spirochetes is highly variable.
Histology Lyme spirochetes are rarely observed in blood smears; examination of tissue is usually performed in addition to an immunologic assay such as fluorescence microscopy. The process is labor-intensive; the test is of limited value.
Serology FDA-approved IFA and EIA test systems
Molecular DNA probe with patient DNA matched to Borrelia DNA

IFA, Indirect fluorescent antibody; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; FDA, Food and Drug Administration.

Antibody Detection

Assays for the detection of antibodies to B. burgdorferi are the most practical means for confirming infection. The CDC currently recommends a two-step process when testing blood for evidence of antibodies against the Lyme disease bacteria. Both steps can be done using the same blood sample. The first step uses an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or, rarely, an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). If the first step is negative, no further testing of the specimen is recommended. If the first step is positive or indeterminate (sometimes called equivocal), the second step should be performed. The second step uses an immunoblot procedure, commonly, a Western blot test. Results are considered positive only if the EIA-IFA and the immunoblot test results are both positive.

The two steps of Lyme disease testing are designed to be done together. CDC does not recommend skipping the first test and just doing the Western blot test. Doing so will increase the frequency of false-positive results and may lead to misdiagnosis and improper treatment.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the standard test method; it is the most widely available and frequently performed test. The sensitivities of IFA and ELISA methods are usually low during the initial 3 weeks of infection; therefore, negative results are common. The most serious disadvantages of current techniques are low sensitivity and lengthy processing time. In addition, false-positive reactions can result from cross-reactivity in tests for Lyme disease. For example, tick-borne relapsing fever spirochetes, Borrelia hermsii, are closely related to B. burgdorferi. Antibodies to B. hermsii, an agent that coexists with the Lyme disease spirochete in portions of the western United States, strongly cross-react with B. burgdorferi in IFA staining and ELISA testing. Common antigens are shared among the Borrelia organisms and even with the treponemes. Serum from syphilitic patients reacts positively in assays for Lyme disease. Therefore, serologic test results for antibodies to B. burgdorferi should be considered along with clinical data and epidemiologic information when a patient is evaluated for Lyme disease.

Western Blot Analysis

Western blot analysis can verify reactivity of antibody to major surface or flagellar proteins of B. burgdorferi (Fig. 19-6). The Western blot test is helpful in determining borderline negative or weakly positive results obtained from other tests, but the values are not always reliable. This procedure is more definitive in later Lyme disease when multiple antibody bands specific for B. burgdorferi appear. Reported results from Western blot tests for Lyme disease in its late phase indicates reactive bands for IgM levels. The 41-kDa bands are the earliest to appear, but can cross-react with other spirochetes. The 18-, 23- to 25- (Osp C), 31- (Osp A), 34- (Osp B), 37-, 39-, 83-, and 93-kDa bands are the most specific, but may appear later or not appear at all.

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PCR testing can detect spirochetes in the synovial fluid around the joints or in other clinical samples. The PCR assay looks for DNA of the organism. In the past, positive PCR assay results were taken as definitive evidence that a person had an infection, but it is possible to have antigens in the presence of nonviable organisms. This test amplifies small amounts of DNA that may remain, even when intact organisms are no longer present, an indication that the organism does or did exist. The PCR assay may miss the spirochete in the blood, allowing it to move into other tissues.

The PCR technique directly identifies the pathogen instead of measuring the host’s immune response to it. It can detect DNA from as few as one to five organisms, even those that are nonviable. Different specific probes have been developed and the PCR assay has been used to detect B. burgdorferi DNA in a variety of body fluids. The appeal of the PCR method lies in its rapid turnaround time (2 days versus 6 to 8 weeks for culture) and avoidance of the difficulties associated with culture or immunohistochemistry. It has very high specificity, but the sensitivity may be as low as 70%. The PCR test may be useful in diagnosing early Lyme disease when the patient is still seronegative.

Treatment and Prevention

Treatment decisions after a tick bite are influenced by the following factors:

Antibiotics

It is unclear whether antimicrobial treatment after an I. scapularis tick bite will prevent Lyme disease. One study concluded that a single 200-mg dose of doxycycline (MLT) given within 72 hours after an I. scapularis tick bite can prevent the development of Lyme disease.

Another study concluded that there is considerable impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with persistent symptoms despite previous antibiotic treatment for acute Lyme disease. In two clinical trials, however, treatment with IV and oral antibiotics for 90 days did not improve symptoms more than placebo.

Various types of antibiotics are in general use for B. burgdorferi treatment. The tetracyclines, including doxycycline and minocycline, are bacteriostatic unless given in high doses. If high blood levels are not attained, treatment failures in early and late disease are common; however, it is difficult to tolerate high doses.

Penicillins are bactericidal. As would be expected in managing an infection with a gram-negative organism such as B. burgdorferi, amoxicillin has been shown to be more effective than oral penicillin V. Because of its short half-life and need for high levels, amoxicillin is usually administered along with probenecid. Because of variability, blood levels are usually measured. Third-generation agents are currently the most effective of the cephalosporins because of their very low blood level counts (0.06 x 109 for ceftriaxone) and they have been shown to be effective in penicillin and tetracycline failures. Cefuroxime axetil (Ceftin), a second-generation agent, is also effective against staphylococci and thus is useful in treating atypical EM, which may represent a mixed infection containing common skin pathogens in addition to B. burgdorferi. Because of this agent’s GI side effects and high cost, cefuroxime is not used as a first-line drug.

Human Ehrlichiosis

Human ehrlichiosis was first described in the United States in 1986; since then, reports of tickborne illnesses have increased. Unlike Lyme disease, which tends to be indolent, Rocky Mountain spotted fever and ehrlichiosis can be fatal and must be recognized and treated promptly.

Epidemiology

Although the prevalence rates are low, human ehrlichiosis is endemic in the United States. Some fatalities have been reported. Incidence rates increase with age and are higher in men than women. Human ehrlichiosis occurs most frequently in the southern Mid-Atlantic and south central states during spring and summer.

The major vector for E. chaffeensis is the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum. The principal reservoir for E. chaffeensis is the white-tailed deer, which hosts all stages of A. americanum. The primary tick vector for the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis is I. scapularis in the eastern United States and I. pacificus in California. Dermacentor variabilis represents a second tick vector in the United States. The major reservoir for infection may be the white-footed mouse in the eastern United States. The onset of illness in spring and early summer for most cases parallels the time when A. americanum and D. variabilis ticks are most active.

Signs and Symptoms

Ehrlichiosis is a general term for human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, now called anaplasmosis, and human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME). The syndrome of human ehrlichiosis is not typically recognized by physicians, but should be considered in patients with a history of tick exposure and an acute febrile, flulike illness. Most patients are not suspected of having a rickettsial infection. Because ehrlichiosis can cause fatal infections in humans, early detection and treatment with tetracycline or chloramphenicol appear to offer the best chance for complete recovery.

Symptoms are nonspecific and include fever, chills, and headache. Fever and skin rashes are the most common physical findings. In children, fever and headache are universal. Myalgias, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia are also common.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Laboratory studies have indicated that the hematologic, hepatic, and central nervous systems are usually involved in human ehrlichiosis. Definitive diagnosis is based on inclusion in leukocytes (Fig. 19-7). Ehrlichia spp. undergo three developmental stages, as follows:

For anaplasmosis, direct observation of intraleukocytic morulae in Wright-Giemsa–stained peripheral blood or buffy coat smears is a rapid and inexpensive laboratory test. If clinical symptoms and the epidemiologic history are compatible with rickettsial infections, the following diagnostic tests should be used during the acute stage of illness and when antibiotic treatment is initiated:

In anaplasmosis, the diagnosis is confirmed by seroconversion or by a single serologic titer higher than 1:80 in patients with a supporting history and clinical symptoms. Seroconversion is defined as a fourfold rise in the titer of paired acute and convalescent sera. Detection of IgM class antibody alone should not be interpreted as recent exposure to the rickettsial agents and should be confirmed by detection of IgG or, preferably, IgG seroconversion by parallel evaluation with a convalescent phase serum collected 4 to 6 weeks after onset of the illness.

In HME the diagnosis is confirmed by seroconversion or by a serologic titer higher than 1:128 in patients with a supporting history and clinical symptoms. Serum or CSF can be analyzed for IgM and IgG antibodies to Ehrlichia spp.

PCR-based detection of the E. phagocytophila–like agent of anaplasmosis represents the most sensitive and direct approach to diagnosis. PCR detection of E. chaffeensis includes the amplification of sequences with 16SrDNA.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Etiology

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a tickborne disease caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii. This organism is a cause of potentially fatal human illness in North and South America, and is transmitted to human beings by the bite of infected tick species. In the United States, these include the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis), Rocky Mountain wood tick (Dermacentor andersoni), and brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus).

Epidemiology

The CDC has noted that the geographic distribution of RMSF correlates with the type of tick found in that area. For example, American dog tick is found in the eastern, central, and Pacific coastal United States; the Rocky Mountain wood tick resides in the western United States. In 2005, the brown dog tick, a vector of RMSF in Mexico was implicated as a vector of this disease in a confined geographic area in Arizona. The cayenne tick (Amblyomma cajennense) is a common vector for RMSF in Central and South America and its range extends into the United States in Texas.

During 1997 to 2002, the estimated average annual incidence of RMSF, based on passive surveillance, was 2.2 cases/million persons. More than half (56%) of reported cases of RMSF were from only five states—North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and Arkansas—but cases have been reported from each of the contiguous 48 states, except Vermont and Maine. RMSF is also endemic throughout several countries in Central and South America, including Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Panama.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Blood specimens are not always useful for detection of the organism through PCR assay or culture. If the patient has a rash, PCR testing or immunohistochemical (IHC) staining can be performed on a skin biopsy taken from the rash site or on autopsy specimens. This can yield rapid results with good sensitivity (70%) when applied to tissue specimens collected during the acute phase of illness and before antibiotic treatment has been started, but a negative result should not be used to guide treatment decisions.

During RMSF infection, a patient’s immune system develops antibodies to R. rickettsii, with detectable antibody titers usually observed within 7-10 days of illness onset. It is important to note that antibodies are not detectable in the first week of illness in 85% of patients; a negative test during this period does not rule out RMSF as a cause of illness.

The gold standard serologic test for diagnosis of RMSF is the IFA with R. rickettsii antigen, performed on two paired serum samples to demonstrate a significant (fourfold) rise in antibody titers. The first sample should be taken as early in the disease as possible, preferably in the first week of symptoms, and the second sample should be taken 2 to 4 weeks later.

Typically, in most RMSF cases, the first IgG IFA titer is low or negative and the second shows a significant (fourfold) increase in IgG antibody levels. IgM antibodies usually rise at the same time as IgG near the end of the first week of illness and remain elevated for months or even years. Also, IgM antibodies are less specific than IgG antibodies and more likely to yield a false-positive result. For these reasons, physicians requesting IgM serologic titers should also request a concurrent IgG titer.

Both IgM and IgG levels may remain elevated for months or longer after the disease has resolved or may be detected in persons who were previously exposed to antigenically related organisms. Up to 10% of currently healthy people in some areas may have elevated antibody titers due to past exposure to R. rickettsii or similar organisms. If only one sample is tested, it can be difficult to interpret, whereas two paired samples taken weeks apart that demonstrate a significant (fourfold) rise in antibody titer provide the best evidence for the correct diagnosis of RMSF.

Babesiosis

Starting in January 2011, cases of babesiosis from across the United States will have been formally reported to the CDC. Becoming nationally notifiable is an important step toward monitoring disease occurrence. Babesiosis is a preventable but sometimes life-threatening, tickborne, parasitic disease.

Etiology

Babesiosis is a rare, severe, and sometimes fatal tickborne disease caused by various types of Babesia, a microscopic parasite that infects red blood cells (Fig. 19-8). The causative organism of babesiosis was first described by Babes in 1888. In New England and the eastern United States, the disease is caused by Babesia microti; in California, it is caused by Babesia equi. In Europe, the disease is caused by Babesia divergens and Babesia bovis. Babesia canis has been found to be responsible for several cases in Mexico and France.

Epidemiology

B. microti is transmitted by tick I. scapularis in the northeastern United States. The larvae of the tick feed mainly on the white-footed mouse (P. leucopus). When larvae develop into nymphs and adults, they feed on the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), but may also choose a human host.

Babesiosis is seen most frequently in older individuals, splenectomized patients, or immunocompromised patients. In the 1970s, cases were primarily reported during the spring, summer, and fall in coastal areas in the northeastern United States, especially Nantucket Island off the coast of Massachusetts and on Long Island in New York. Cases have also been reported in Wisconsin, California, Georgia, and Missouri, as well as in some European countries. The organism has also been transmitted via blood transfusion from asymptomatic donors.

The U.S. blood supply is vulnerable to transfusion-transmitted Babesia. Between 1979 and 2009, 159 cases of transfusion-related babesiosis were identified. Most (77%) of the identified cases occurred between 2000 to 2009.

Diagnostic Evaluation

In symptomatic people, babesiosis usually is diagnosed by examining blood specimens under a microscope and observing Babesia parasites inside red blood cells. Multiple smears may need to be examined to detect low levels of parasites. Two rapid screening methods are used for the identification of Babesia organisms. The gold standard for their identification is the visualization of the intraerythrocytic organisms in thick or thin blood films. Sometimes, it is hard to distinguish Babesia spp. from Plasmodium falciparum (malaria) by blood smear examination. Also, some Babesia spp. (e.g., B. microti, B. duncani) appear identical; they cannot be distinguished from each other by microscopy.

Acute and convalescent antibody titers may be useful for diagnosis. A titer higher than 1:256 is considered diagnostic of acute infection. Only IgG antibody determinations are performed. PCR amplification can be used for diagnosis.

Molecular diagnosis can also be useful. In some infections with intraerythrocytic parasites, the morphologic characteristics observed on microscopic examination of blood smears do not allow an unambiguous differentiation between Babesia and Plasmodium organisms. In these cases, the diagnosis can be derived from molecular techniques such as PCR testing using the appropriate primers and single-step or the more sensitive nested PCR technique. In addition, molecular approaches are valuable for the investigation of new Babesia variants (or species) observed in recent human infections in the United States and Europe.

No Babesia test approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently available for screening prospective blood donors, who may feel healthy despite being infected. Some manufacturers are working with investigators at blood centers to develop FDA-approved tests for Babesia for donor screening.

West Nile Virus

Etiology

West Nile virus (WNV) is a member of the Japanese encephalitis virus group of flaviviruses that cause febrile illness and encephalitis in human beings. WNV is a mosquito-borne pathogen.

Diagnostic Evaluation

Historically, flavivirus infections have been diagnosed by serologic tests or virus isolation. IgM antibody is evident in most infected patients 7 to 8 days after the onset of symptoms. IgM antibody has been shown to persist for longer than 500 days in approximately 60% of cases. Most patients demonstrate IgG antibody in 3 to 4 weeks after infection.

Several molecular techniques are available for diagnosis. Molecular detection of WNV is used for prevention of transmission by blood transfusion and transplantation. Laboratory diagnosis of WNV infection is generally accomplished by testing of serum or CSF to detect virus-specific IgM and neutralizing antibodies.

Four FDA-approved WNV IgM ELISA kits from different manufacturers are commercially available in the United States. According to the package inserts, each of these kits is indicated for use on serum to aid in the presumptive laboratory diagnosis of WNV infection in patients with clinical symptoms of meningitis or encephalitis. The package inserts also state that all positive results obtained with any of the commercially available WNV test kits should be confirmed by additional testing at a state health department laboratory or by the CDC.

In fatal cases, nucleic acid amplification, histopathology with immunohistochemistry and virus culture of autopsy tissues can also be useful. Only a few state laboratories or other specialized laboratories, including those at the CDC, can carry out this specialized testing.

Treatment and Prevention

There is no specific treatment for WNV infection. In patients with milder disease, symptoms resolve over time, although even healthy people have been sick for several weeks. In patients with more severe disease, hospitalization is usually required for supportive treatment, including IV fluids.

Prevention consists of avoiding mosquito bites.

CASE STUDY 1

A 42-year-old executive lived in New York City. Her company annually sponsored a Memorial Day weekend golf outing at a Long Island club. In early June, she noticed a solid, bright red spot on her left thigh. The spot was about 2 inches wide in the bright red area with an overall diameter of about 6 inches, including the surrounding pale area. The ensuing 11 months passed without further incident.

The following Memorial Day weekend, she was stung several times by bees. Both systemic and local reactions followed. About 1 week later, last year’s red ring on the thigh reappeared. During this interval, she experienced fever, malaise, arthromyalgias, headache, and a stiff neck, but recovered completely.

In the fall, the woman noticed insidiously progressive fatigue, malaise, memory deficits, irritability, and inattentiveness to the demands of her job.

She visited a physician, but no abnormalities were noted, and she was referred to a Manhattan neurologist. The patient was eventually diagnosed as having Lyme disease.

CASE STUDY 2

A 25-year-old graduate student visited his local family physician because of episodic arthromyalgias, sporadic global headaches, fatigue, irritability, and depression. Over the last several months, he had become seriously dysfunctional at work and home.

His residence and travel history revealed a week-long vacation on Cape Cod the previous summer. He could not recall any tick bites or skin lesions fitting the description of EM.

A laboratory test yielded a positive result and a 4-week course of doxycycline was initiated. Two weeks later, he noted significant improvement in symptoms, but 3 months later his previous symptoms recurred. His laboratory test was repeated and again was positive. A 1-month regimen of amoxicillin and probenecid was initiated. This time, there was no improvement. No neurologic findings were apparent. His joints were painful, but no overt synovitis was present. Two months after the second course of antibiotic, his Lyme test result was still positive and the patient was given 2 weeks of infusion therapy with ceftriaxone. His symptoms disappeared after this treatment.

CASE STUDY 3

A 45-year-old man from upstate New York visited his physician because of a worsening headache, myalgia, arthralgia, and generalized weakness. He had been in good health until about 1 week before the appointment. A fever and myalgia began after the patient removed a small tick from his left thigh while on vacation in an area in which B. burgdorferi was endemic. In addition, the deer tick found in the area that he visited on vacation is the vector of Lyme disease, babesiosis and, most likely, anaplasmosis.

On physical examination, the patient had a slight fever. His thigh had a rash suggestive of EM. Laboratory results included a complete blood count and liver function tests. A skin scraping was obtained to culture B. burgdorferi. Buffy coat smears of peripheral blood were also requested.

The patient had a slight leukopenia, normal white blood cell differential, and normal hemoglobin and hematocrit values. His liver function test results were slightly abnormal. Wright-stained buffy coat smears revealed the presence of morulae of anaplasmosis. The patient was prescribed oral doxycycline twice daily for 14 days. Nine days after initiation of treatment, the patient improved greatly. Repeat laboratory test results were all within the normal reference range. His rash had resolved.

CASE STUDY 4

This 73-year-old, previously healthy man had spent the previous summer on Martha’s Vineyard. On returning to his home in Boston after Labor Day, he began to feel unusually tired and had difficulty breathing. He also reported that his urine had become dark brown several days after returning home.

On physical examination, the patient was found to be jaundiced and he had an enlarged spleen. A complete blood count, urinalysis, and blood chemistries were ordered. His total white blood cell count was normal but he had an increased percentage of segmented neutrophils. His hemoglobin and hematocrit values and platelet count were all below the normal reference range. He had hematuria and proteinuria. His liver function test results were greatly elevated. His renal function assays were also elevated. A follow-up Wright-stained peripheral blood smear revealed numerous B. microti organisms.

The patient was treated with quinine and the antibiotics clindamycin and doxycycline. He also received 2 units of packed red blood cells (RBCs) (MLT). Six days later, the patient was discharged from the hospital.

image Rapid Borrelia burgdorferi Antibody Detection Assay

The PreVue Borrelia burgdorferi assay (Wampole Laboratories, Princeton, NJ) is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)–waived, single-use, rapid immunographic membrane assay for the qualitative presumptive (first step) detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to B. burgdorferi in human serum or whole blood. Positive results must be confirmed with a Western blot test. This procedure uses antigenic proteins developed by recombinant DNA techniques rather than a whole cell B. burgdorferi preparation. Antigenic proteins developed by recombinant DNA techniques allow for more accuracy. The false-positive rate is similar to that of other laboratory tests for Lyme disease.

The procedural protocol is posted on the image website.

Chapter Highlights

• Lyme disease (borreliosis) is caused by the tick-borne spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and is a major health hazard for human beings and domestic animals.

• Lyme disease has been considered an emerging infectious disease because of the impact of changing environmental and socioeconomic factors (e.g., transformation of farmland into suburban woodlots favorable for deer and deer ticks).

• The basic features of Lyme disease are similar worldwide. In at least 60% to 80% of U.S. patients, it begins with a slowly expanding skin lesion, EM, at the site of the tick bite.

• Lyme borreliosis is a multisystem illness that primarily involves the skin, nervous system, heart, and joints. It usually begins during the summer months with EM and flulike symptoms.

• Cellular immune responses to B. burgdorferi antigens begin concurrently with early clinical illness, with increased spontaneous suppressor cell and reduced NK cell activity. Mononuclear cell, antigen-specific responses develop during spirochetal dissemination, and humoral (antibody) immune responses soon follow.

• Serodiagnostic tests are insensitive during the first several weeks of Borrelia infection. About 20% to 30% of U.S. patients have positive responses, usually of the IgM isotype, during this period, but by convalescence 2 to 4 weeks later, about 70% to 80% have seroreactivity even after antibiotic treatment. After about 1 month, most patients with active infection have IgG antibody responses. After antibiotic treatment, antibody titers fall slowly, but IgG and IgM responses may persist for years.

• Specific IgM or IgG antibodies against B. burgdorferi are usually not detectable in a patient’s serum unless symptoms have been present for at least 2 to 4 weeks. In Lyme arthritis, test results (ANAs, RF, VDRL) are generally negative, and anti–B. burgdorferi antibodies (IgG) should be present.

• The most common laboratory assays for B. burgdorferi antibody detection include IFA, ELISA, and PreVue. Immunoblotting techniques can be used with ELISA. PreVue is the first presumptive step in testing individuals with suspected Lyme disease. Positive results must be confirmed by Western blot testing.

• Described first in the United States in 1986, tickborne rickettsiae of the genus Ehrlichia cause human illness. Ehrlichiosis is a general term for anaplasmosis and HME.

• Anaplasmosis diagnosis is confirmed by seroconversion (fourfold rise in acute/convalescent sera titer) or single serologic titer greater than 1:80 in patients with a history and symptoms. HME diagnosis is confirmed by seroconversion or serologic titer greater than 1:128.

• Babesiosis is a rare, severe, possibly fatal tickborne disease caused by Babesia, which infects RBCs.

• Babesia spp. are visualized as intraerythrocytic organisms in thick peripheral (rapid Field’s test) or thin blood films. Acute and convalescent antibody titers may be useful; a titer higher than 1:256 is diagnostic of acute infection. Only IgG antibody determinations are performed. PCR amplification can be used for diagnosis.

• West Nile virus, a mosquito-borne virus present in the United States since at least 1999, causes febrile illness and encephalitis in human beings.

• In WNV, IgM antibody is evident in most infected patients 7 to 8 days after the onset of symptoms, persisting for more than 500 days in 60% of cases. Most patients demonstrate IgG antibody in 3 to 4 weeks after infection.