Uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence

Published on 09/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Obstetrics & Gynecology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2475 times

8 Uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence

Uterovaginal prolapse

In the majority of women the uterus is said to be in a position of anteversion (the fundus directed forwards) and anteflexed (the body of the uterus bent forward over the cervix) – retroversion and retroflexion are the converse of these and occur in approximately 20% of cases. The main structures that hold the uterus in position are the uterosacral and transverse cervical ligaments. The normal uterus is mobile and is, therefore, able to adjust its position in the pelvis as a result of any pelvic mass or distension of the bladder or rectum. The secondary support of the uterus is the muscular pelvic floor.

Anatomy of the pelvic floor

Prolapse is caused by a failure of the supporting structures of the genital tract and it is, therefore, important to have an understanding of this anatomy. The pelvic floor consists of muscular and fascial structures that support the abdominopelvic cavity and the external openings of the vagina, urethra and rectum. The uterus and vagina are suspended from the pelvic side walls by endopelvic fascial attachments that support the vagina at three levels or anatomical sections:

Most of the endopelvic fascia fibres attach to the vaginal wall, but a few pass from one side to the other and are recognized as the rectovaginal septum separating the vagina and rectum. Damage at the different levels of vaginal support causes different types of prolapse. Level 1 support failure results in vaginal vault or uterine prolapse, whereas loss of level 2 support leads to development of cystocele and rectocele, and level 3 disruption results in any of the above (as it acts as an anchor for all the supports) and a deficient perineum.

Examination

Abdominal examination should always be performed to exclude any masses or organomegaly. The woman should first be examined in the dorsal position when she is asked to bear down, strain or cough, during which inspection of the introitus should reveal any obvious second- or third-degree prolapse; stress incontinence may be demonstrated and atrophy may be apparent. Examination is then performed with the patient in the Sims’ position (patient in left lateral position with chest at 45°∞ to the examining couch, the left leg straight, the right hip extended and knee flexed) with a Sims’ speculum, which allows full inspection of the uterine prolapse and vaginal walls (Fig. 8.2). The blade of the Sims’ speculum is inserted along the posterior wall of the vagina and retracted in order to display the anterior wall, with the patient bearing down. The anterior wall can be supported with sponge forceps to assess for apical descent (cervix or vault) and then the anterior vaginal wall is supported in order to assess the posterior wall, with the patient bearing down. Vaginal examination is performed in the usual manner with assessment of the uterus and adnexae as previously outlized and any obvious descent of the cervix or prolapse of the vaginal walls noted. In the research setting and increasingly in specialist centres, a system called pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) can be utilized. This is a complex nine-point assessment of uterovaginal prolapse, which describes four stages of pelvic organ descent relative to the hymenal ring.

Treatment

The choice of treatment depends on the patient’s wishes, general health and desires regarding future sexual function. Conservative or surgical options are available and a combination of the two is ideal. Management will depend on the severity of symptoms and suitability for anaesthesia.

Conservative measures

Many types of pessaries have been developed for vaginal and uterine support, although surgical correction should be considered whenever possible. A typical plastic ring pessary should comfortably rest between the posterior fornix and the symphysis pubis, thereby supporting and stretching the vaginal wall, preventing vault prolapse and directly supporting any cystocele present (Fig. 8.3). Pessaries need to be replaced 6-monthly to avoid infection or ulceration of the vagina. Pelvic floor re-education or strengthening is best achieved under the direction of a trained continence advisor or by a physiotherapist using directed muscle exercises or weighted vaginal cones that the woman must try to retain within the vagina. Sometimes this can be combined with electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles, which has also been shown to be of benefit.

Surgical procedures

The choice of procedure depends on the patient and the type of prolapse that exists – the ‘site-specific’ repair. Factors that influence the type of surgical procedure include fitness of the patient and suitability for anaesthesia, whether the patient is sexually active and the surgeon’s preference.

Anterior repair (colporrhaphy) is a procedure that repairs fascial defects in the anterior vaginal wall and removes the excess vaginal skin that results from the prolapse (Fig. 8.4). This can also include the use of a supporting suture (buttress) under the urethra. Complications are uncommon, although postoperative voiding difficulties may occur and recurrence of prolapse occurs in up to 50% of patients.

Posterior colpoperineorrhaphy is a repair of the posterior wall prolapse, which involves repair of rectovaginal fascial defect and approximation of the levator ani muscles medially to support the rectum with removal of the excess vaginal skin (Fig. 8.5).

Vaginal hysterectomy can be performed with the above procedures in cases where there is significant uterine descent, especially if the patient is postmenopausal or if there are significant menstrual problems.

To preserve the uterus, e.g. for women who may still wish to become pregnant, it is possible to combine the anterior and posterior colpoperineorrhaphy with partial amputation of the cervix (which is often elongated in prolapse) and approximation of the transverse cervical ligaments in the midline for support. This is called a Manchester (or Fothergill) repair.

Sacrohysteropexy is another procedure that can be performed if the patient wishes to preserve her uterus. It is an abdominal procedure that involves using a synthetic mesh placed between the cervix and the sacrum to support the uterus and this is increasingly being performed laparoscopically or robotically.

Vault prolapse can be corrected via either an abdominal (sacrocolpopexy) (Fig. 8.6) or vaginal (sacrospinous ligament fixation) procedure. The latter involves suturing the vault to the sacrospinous ligament. Both these techniques are effective, but the vaginal route has less immediate postoperative morbidity. Both techniques of vault fixation can cause either posterior or anterior (respectively) wall prolapse in the long term.

It is worth noting that some anti-incontinence procedures, in particular a Burch colposuspension (Fig. 8.7), may also cure a cystocele, especially if done in conjunction with a paravaginal repair.

Urinary incontinence

Urinary incontinence is defined as the involuntary loss of urine that is a social and hygienic problem, and is objectively demonstrable. Urge (incontinence preceded by an urgent desire to void) and stress (incontinence during physical exertion, movement or any causes of increased intra-abdominal pressure) are the most prevalent forms of incontinence.

Assessment

Investigation of urinary incontinence

Patients should be given a fluid chart or micturition diary to complete a week prior to the consultation so that a clear pattern of fluid intake and voiding can be established. At the same time a quality-of-life questionnaire can be completed to assess the extent of impact of symptoms on the patient’s daily activities. This will provide a baseline against which the effects of treatment may be assessed.

Measurement of urinary flow rate can be performed on the patient who attends with a full bladder. This is performed with an intravesical pressure catheter, which can measure bladder pressures during voluntary voiding into a special commode that can measure the flow rate. This will differentiate poor flow as a result of an obstructed urethra as opposed to a poorly functioning detrusor muscle. While inserting the catheter, a specimen of urine can be collected to exclude urinary infection.

Subtracted cystometry is a urodynamic test that measures the intravesical pressure during artificial filling of the bladder and then during voiding. This can then determine the presence or absence of involuntary detrusor contractions and, therefore, diagnose detrusor instability if present.

Videocystourethrography is a test that can be performed at the same time as cystometry, using a radiopaque fluid as the filling medium. X-ray imaging of the full bladder can be performed to assess for ureteric reflux, bladder diverticulum, bladder descent or urinary leakage whilst the patient coughs. This is also a useful test if a vesicovaginal fistula is suspected.

Overactive bladder

Urinary urgency is a common problem, with a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Over 200 million people worldwide experience problems associated with urinary incontinence and an estimated 50–100 million people suffer from overactive bladder. The terms ‘overactive bladder’ and ‘detrusor overactivity’ have previously been used interchangeably to describe a condition in the bladder that results in the symptoms of urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency and urge incontinence. Detrusor overactivity is in fact a urodynamic diagnosis that can only be applied after patients have been investigated by cystometry; it is defined as ‘a disorder of bladder filling and urine storage characterized by the presence of involuntary detrusor contractions while the patient is attempting to inhibit urination’. This definition subdivides detrusor overactivity into two subtypes, based on results obtained from cystometric (urodynamic) testing. These are detrusor hyperreflexia (caused by neurologic disease, e.g. spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke or Parkinson’s disease) and detrusor overactivity in the absence of neurologic disease. The latter is further subdivided into the idiopathic variety or that caused by bladder outlet obstruction (e.g. post bladder neck surgery for stress incontinence). Regardless of the cause or type, the condition is characterized by the symptoms of frequency (emptying the bladder more than eight times during the daytime), urgency (the sudden strong desire to micturate) or urge incontinence (the involuntary loss of urine that occurs after the sensation of impending leakage), either singly or in combination.

Management

Establishing an accurate diagnosis of the cause of urinary symptoms is important and requires invasive urodynamic investigation. However, treatment can be instigated prior to urodynamic assessment provided there is no contraindication and in the absence of the following: urinary tract infection, haematuria, neuropathy, uropathology, voiding difficulty, previous surgery or if uncertainty of the cause of the urinary symptoms exists. In these situations referral for further investigation is mandatory.

Women with mild overactive bladder symptoms may only require reassurance or advice on conservative measures such as reducing fluid intake, abstinence from caffeine drinks and alcohol, change of voiding habits, and alteration of medications, e.g. diuretics. However, the mainstay of treatment is drug therapy (anticholinergics) and bladder retraining or bladder drill:

The main purpose of drug therapy is to overcome the initial overactive bladder symptoms so that simple measures like bladder retraining have a greater impact in the long term. If symptoms are completely unresponsive to conservative and medical treatments, surgery can be offered. Sacral nerve implants for neuromodulation and intravesical Botox therapy have been shown to be effective in patients with intractable overactive bladder symptoms.

Stress incontinence

Stress urinary incontinence is a symptom whilst urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) is urodynamic diagnosis. It describes the involuntary loss of urine when the intra-abdominal pressure increases, e.g. with the patient coughing. USI is defined as the involuntary loss of urine when the intravesical pressure exceeds the maximum urethral pressure in the absence of a detrusor contraction.

Management

Conservative measures include general advice regarding fluid restriction, weight loss, avoiding bladder irritants and changing medications (e.g. diuretics). All patients should attempt pelvic floor re-education and urodynamic investigation must be performed before any surgery is considered.

Surgery is performed when conservative measures have failed and the patient’s quality of life is compromised. The options depend on the patient’s fitness for anaesthesia and whether any other prolapse exists. Burch colposuspension was the gold-standard procedure, with a success rate of 85–90%. The retropubic space is entered through a small suprapubic incision and two or three permanent sutures are placed on either side of the bladder neck to the corresponding ileopectineal ligament (see Fig. 8.7). This procedure can also be performed laparoscopically. There are a variety of ‘sling’ procedures that can be performed abdominally or vaginally, with rectus sheath, fascia lata or synthetic materials. The commonest type is the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure (Fig. 8.8), which has the advantage that it can be performed under local anaesthesia. It has success rates of between 80 and 90% and has taken over from the Burch procedure as the gold-standard treatment for USI. An alternative method of placing the mid urethral sling is via the obturator foramen and this technique is also proving an effective alternative to TVT. Anterior colporrhaphy with bladder buttress is rarely performed for stress incontinence as it has cure rates of less than 50%.

Injectables or bulking agents are appropriate if previous surgery has failed or in very elderly patients. Various compounds may be used, including collagen, with success rates of 50%.

Complications for all these procedures include postoperative voiding difficulty, bleeding, infection, de novo detrusor overactivity and suture or mesh erosion (in the ‘sling’ procedure).