Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Access for Hemodialysis

Published on 16/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 16/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1546 times

Chapter 35

Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Access for Hemodialysis

Preoperative Evaluation

History, physical examination, vein mapping by duplex ultrasound, and in some cases venography play a role in establishing the surgical approach to AV access in a particular patient. In general, use of the nondominant upper extremity is preferred. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease should be instructed to “save” an arm, avoiding venipuncture or peripheral intravenous (IV) placement, to preserve surface vein integrity for future creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or as outflow for an arteriovenous graft (AVG). AVF is preferred over AVG because of the lower risk of infection, lower rate of subsequent intervention for patency, and overall longevity.

However, AVFs require significantly more time to dilate and mature (weeks to months) before they are suitable for cannulation. Furthermore, a significant percentage of AVFs created may never mature sufficiently for use. This fact must be taken into account when selecting the best approach for an individual patient. Most algorithms direct surgeons to use more anatomically distal sites first (e.g., wrist fistula before arm fistula, forearm graft before brachioaxillary graft). This principle preserves proximal venous outflow for future AVF or AVG, if needed. In addition, establishment of distal AV flow can dilate the arm veins, preparing these for use as an AVF in the future.

Technical Considerations

The hemodialysis patient population, often advanced in age, suffers from serious systemic disease and multiple comorbidities. Tissues are often fragile, arteries may be calcified or diseased, and surgical wounds may heal slowly or poorly. Therefore, meticulous technique, use of fine instruments, and gentle tissue handling are essential to avoid complications. Care must be taken to avoid cautery or retraction trauma to nearby sensorimotor nerves. Minimizing vessel manipulation can reduce vasospasm of artery or vein.

End-to-side or side-to-side AV anastomosis may be performed, depending on the ability to mobilize the vein in question and the need to preserve multiple (retrograde) venous outflow paths. Surface venous anatomy varies considerably, particularly near the antecubital fossa; adjustment in placement of the skin incision or use of draining venous side branches may be necessary. Anastomosis diameter, relative to size of inflow artery and outflow vein, may be a factor in achieving adequate arterial inflow for fistula dilation or in the development of “arterial steal” from the hand circulation. Subcutaneous tunneling of prosthetic graft material must be deep enough to allow puncture site sealing, but not so deep to be undetectable for cannulation. Attention to hemostasis and layered coverage of underlying vascular anastomosis or prosthetic graft material will protect against wound complications and graft infection.

Preoperative Vessel Mapping by Duplex Ultrasound

Standard vessel-mapping protocols provide important information regarding approach to the best AVF or AVG location. Cephalic vein diameter is shown in Figure 35-1, A. Venous fibrosis, identified by thickened vein walls or incomplete compressibility, may predict poor distensibility with arterial inflow. Thrombosis from venipuncture or IV placement is shown in gray-scale imaging (Fig. 35-1, B). The basilic vein often lies deep and medial in the arm and will need superficialization if used for AVF (Fig. 35-1, C). A small or heavily calcified radial artery at the wrist, a common finding in diabetic patients, may contraindicate use of this artery for inflow (Fig. 35-1, D).