Tympanoplasty-Undersurface Graft Technique: Transcanal Approach

Published on 13/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2373 times

Chapter 11 Tympanoplasty—Undersurface Graft Technique

Transcanal Approach

image Videos corresponding to this chapter are available online at www.expertconsult.com.

Many otologic surgeons prefer placing connective tissue grafts medial to the tympanic membrane remnant. This graft placement can be accomplished through either a transcanal or a postauricular approach. This chapter describes in detail the transcanal technique and discusses our rationale for favoring it.

GRAFT SELECTION

In transcanal tympanoplasty using the underlay technique, the grafting material may be any type of autogenous connective tissue, such as vein, fascia, or perichondrium. In 1957, Shea,1 using vein, was the first to use the underlay grafting technique. Tabb,2 Austin and Shea,3 and others soon recognized the superiority of this method over onlay skin grafting and followed Shea’s lead. The use of fascia as an underlay graft was first reported by Storrs.4 Tragal perichondrium was first used in tympanoplasty as an onlay graft by Goodhill and associates,5 and it is the material we prefer. It is in the immediate surgical field, is extremely durable, and is very easy to handle when pressed. Vein also is easy to position and, if large enough (as from the antecubital fossa), can be used to repair perforations of any size. Our primary objection to the use of vein grafts is that in the event of a serious future illness, the large vein could be an important means of administering parenteral medications.

Temporalis fascia, its overlying areolar tissue, or even scar tissue from the vicinity of a previous postauricular incision can be used with the transcanal undersurface technique, but it is not as easy to handle as vein or perichondrium. Pressing the fascia in a vein or fascia press makes it much more manageable by eliminating the tenacious loose strands, and at the same time preventing the stiffness that occurs with drying. We do not recommend pressing the vein for tympanoplasty (as done in stapedectomy) because it results in excessive thinning. Instead, we trim away the adventitia and stretch the vessel between the blades of a vein scissors before opening it.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Visibility: Canal Enlargement and Speculum Placement

The sine qua non for successful transcanal surgery is adequate exposure. Inadequate visibility is probably the primary objection to this technique, but there are several moves that can significantly improve it. The external auditory meatus can be enlarged by making a small slit in the superior aspect of its lateral end with a No. 15 scalpel blade and stretching it with a nasal speculum. The largest sized ear speculum that can be atraumatically inserted is used and secured with a speculum holder (Fig. 11-2). The speculum holder is essential because it allows the use of both hands and serves as a support for the surgeon’s fingers. The holder is quite mobile, and allows the speculum to be placed and secured in the optimal position. It should be repositioned as needed throughout the procedure. The microscope head should also be moved about frequently to provide an unobstructed view of the operative field. Generally, the less complex the microscope, the more mobile it is, and the easier it is to use.

Another item that is extremely helpful in improving visibility is the hydraulic chair. Because it can be lowered or raised in a matter of seconds, it rapidly allows the surgeon to change position in relation to the patient’s ear without the need for a circulating nurse to tilt the operating table back and forth.

In the case of anterior and large central perforations, the anterior margin frequently cannot be seen because of a bulging anterior canal wall (Fig. 11-3). This problem can be remedied easily in 99% of cases by removing the hump. Sometimes the removal of a “dog-house” segment of anterior canal wall skin is all that is necessary. Frequently, the bony hump must also be removed, and this can be done quickly with a curette or small cutting burr (Fig. 11-4). In the removal of this bony hump, one must be aware of the proximity of the temporomandibular joint and avoid penetration into it. It is important to leave a 2 to 3 mm strip of skin intact between the annulus and the medial end of the resected skin. The excised skin is preserved in physiologic solution until the end of the procedure, at which time it is replaced.

If the anterior perforation is marginal, the Austin “reverse elevator” (Fig. 11-5) is used to elevate the annulus and the adjacent 1 to 2 mm of the canal wall skin to provide a larger raw surface area for graft attachment. This elevated area gradually retracts into its normal position as the ear heals. It is a crucial maneuver in the successful repair of the anterior marginal perforation.

Canal Incisions and Middle Ear Exposure

A posterior tympanomeatal incision is made with the superior limb beginning 2 to 3 mm anterior to the malleus neck (Fig. 11-8). This makes it possible to elevate the drumhead remnant completely off of the malleus handle (Fig. 11-9). Removal of the drumhead remnant from the malleus handle is performed in most situations except those in which the perforation is in an inferior or extremely posterior position. Two possible major advantages result from this. First, removal of any squamous epithelial ingrowth along the medial aspect of the malleus handle is facilitated. And second, ossicular chain reconstruction may be benefited since placement of the graft lateral to the handle of the malleus allows a malleus to stapes prosthesis to be palced directly against the bare malleus, without an intervening graft. This second advantage becomes moot however if a PORP or TORP is used.

Perichondrial Graft

The tragal perichondrial graft is taken. If the perforation involves 60% of the surface of the drumhead or less, the graft usually may be obtained from the posterior aspect of the tragus through an incision immediately posterior to the free border without removal of the cartilage itself (Fig. 11-10). If the perforation involves more than 60% of the drumhead, the entire tragus with its perichondrium is removed through an incision along the free border. The excess soft tissue is removed from the perichondrium overlying the anterior surface of the tragus, and the entire perichondrium is removed from both sides of the cartilage and over the free border with a duckbill or Freer elevator and thumb forceps (Fig. 11-11). The cartilage is reinserted into the wound in its normal position to preserve the tragal contour, and the incision is closed with fine absorbable suture. The perichondrium is pressed with a vein or fascia press (Fig. 11-12). This process thins the graft for easier handling and enlarges it so that any size perforation can be closed.

Graft Placement and Stabilization

For medium-sized or large perforations, the tympanomeatal flap is lifted, and the graft is placed over the posterior middle ear space, and then advanced over the malleus handle to the anteriormost extent of the perforation. The tympanomeatal flap is laid back down over the graft, and the graft edges are tucked under the margins of the flap (Fig. 11-14). With smaller posterior and inferior perforations, the graft may simply be inserted through the perforation and smoothed out posteriorly by elevating the tympanomeatal flap.

When using a perichondrial graft, the surface that was in contact with the cartilage should be positioned toward the middle ear. With a vein graft, the intimal surface should be medially placed. After the graft has been roughly positioned, the edges of the perforation are carefully everted bimanually with a 20 gauge suction tip and 90 degree pick to prevent the ingrowth of squamous epithelium. If the graft does not appear to be adequately supported by Gelfoam, it can be reflected back, and additional Gelfoam can be inserted.

Some surgeons prefer to place the graft medial to the malleus handle.6 As we pointed out earlier, we prefer graft placement onto the surface of the malleus since this allows a malleus to stapes prosthesis to be approximated directly to the bony surface of the malleus without an intervening graft. Adhesions between the umbo and promontory are also less likely to occur if the drum is placed lateral to the malleus handle.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

The only dressing that is used is a small, sterile, cotton ball that is loosely placed in the conchal cavity to absorb drainage. When the drainage stops, the cotton is discontinued, and the ear is allowed to ventilate. In the event that purulent discharge occurs, antibiotic otic drops are started and continued until the first postoperative visit. The patient is instructed to avoid getting water in the affected ear or blowing the nose until the first postoperative visit at 3 weeks. At that time, the ear is cleaned using the operating microscope, and the graft is inspected. Approximately 95% of the time, the graft will have taken, and the drumhead will be intact. Autoinflation is now begun using the Valsalva maneuver. If the patient is unable to ventilate the middle ear within 1 week to 10 days after the first postoperative visit, a small ventilation tube is inserted in the drumhead. If the graft is intact but not completely epithelialized at the time of the first postoperative visit, antimicrobial drops or a vinegar/alcohol solution should be used for 1 to 3 weeks to promote healing.

Although frank graft failure is a rarity, a small area of residual perforation occasionally is found. If this occurs, the edges can be cauterized with trichloroacetic acid and covered with a cigarette paper patch impregnated with povidone-iodine solution. The area is re-examined in 2 to 3 weeks, at which time it is usually healed. If revision surgery is necessary, it should be delayed for at least 3 months to allow for resolution of postoperative inflammatory changes.