7 Tricuspid and Pulmonic Valve Disease
Tricuspid Regurgitation
Scanning Issues
Required parameters to obtain from scanning include the following:
Valve and RV details to explain the cause of the tricuspid regurgitation (TR)
RV size and systolic function, and net forward cardiac index (CI) from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT)–velocity time interval (VTI) method
Scanning Notes
There are problems with color Doppler “quantification” of TR, as there are for color Doppler flow-mapping of any lesions of insufficiency: TR flow-mapping is dependent on gain, angle, position, and jet shape and orientation.
Retrograde hepatic venous systolic flow reliably establishes that TR is severe.
Obtain the complete TR profile by appropriate means, and measure in the center of the parabola. The single most common problem with TR spectral recording is not having enough signal to establish the true peak velocity. If the complete profile does not appear to be present, the cursor should be placed off to the side of the profile so that the reviewer is not swayed by the position of the cursor placed by the person recording the study.
Spectral profiles should be two-thirds the height of the display, and wide enough so that there are two or three per display.
Use zoom views liberally to identify the valve lesion responsible for TR.
Proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) techniques are acceptable for severity assessment, but offer no more than does hepatic venous flow, and therefore are not required.
Reporting Issues
Describe the suspected cause of the TR (i.e., leaflet, annular or RV disease).
Describe the severity of the TR.
Describe the RV function and geometry.
Note that the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) varies by 25% throughout a given day.
Ensure that the true peak of the TR jet is used—attempt to avoid under-calling the severity of the RVSP.
Avoid use of the term “trivial” for TR, as it is normal if the valve is structurally normal.
RVSP only equates with pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure when pulmonic stenosis is absent; therefore, Doppler exclusion of pulmonary stenosis (PS) is essential.
For any given size of tricuspid valve ERO, there is less regurgitant flow than with MR, as the usual RV–RA gradients are less than the usual left ventricular (LV)–left atrial (LA) gradients. Absence of hepatic venous flow reversal is associated with tricuspid valve EROs (<40 mm2) and therefore, in the final analysis, tricuspid valve–ERO generally adds little to hepatic flow profiling.1
Causes of Tricuspid Regurgitation
“Functional” (i.e., intact leaflet/chordal/papillary components)
Myxomatous tricuspid valve disease/tricuspid valve prolapse
RV papillary muscle rupture: post-infarction, post-trauma, post-biopsy, post–lead extraction
Ebstein’s Anomaly
Apical displacement of the septal and or posterior leaflets
“Atrialization” of the right ventricle
“Tethering” of the anterior leaflet
Smaller functional right ventricle
The amount of TR is usually worst at birth as the PVR is highest
Estimation of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure
Potential problems in estimating the RVSP include the following:
No TR from which to determine RV–RA gradient
Insufficient TR from which to determine maximum RV–RA gradient
Inability to record the full TR profile due to inadequate signal
The correlation of RV:RA gradient is excellent (r = 0.95; SEE = 7 mm Hg)2 (r = 0.96; SEE = 7 mm Hg),3 but the correlation of jugular venous pressure estimate to catheter RAP is less good (r = 0.80; SEE = 2.3 mm Hg). Clearly, clinical estimate of jugular venous pressure overestimates lower RAPs (<8 cm) and underestimates higher RAPs—sometimes by 40% when the true RAP is 20 mm Hg.
More patients with an elevated RVSP have analyzable TR spectral profiles than do patients (half) with normal RVSP.3 However, an important minority subset of patients with severely elevated RVSP (approximately 20–25% of cases of primary pulmonary hypertension) may not have associated TR to yield an analyzable (complete) TR spectral profile. Overall, the correlation of echocardiographic RVSP to catheter RVSP is quite good (r = 0.93; SEE = 8 mm), but remains influenced by the vagaries of estimating jugular venous pressure and RAP.2
Indications for the management and intervention in tricuspid regurgitation are listed in Boxes 7-1 and 7-2.
Tricuspid Stenosis
Scanning Issues
Required parameters to obtain from scanning include the following: