Triangular Fibrocartilage Débridement and Arthroscopically Assisted Ulnar Shortening

Published on 11/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2200 times

CHAPTER 22 Triangular Fibrocartilage Débridement and Arthroscopically Assisted Ulnar Shortening

A tear of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is one of the most frequent causes of ulnar wrist pain. Ulnar-sided wrist pain associated with a TFCC tear in the presence of an ulnar-neutral or ulnar-plus variance constitutes an ulnar abutment syndrome. Successful treatment of an ulnar abutment syndrome requires débridement of the TFCC tear and ulnar shortening.

PATIENT EVALUATION

Physical Examination

Ulnocarpal palpation can give some insight into the condition of the TFCC. The synovitis associated with a TFCC tear can render simple palpation of the ulnocarpal joint uncomfortable.

The ulnocarpal compression test (Fig. 22-3) is particularly helpful in assessing the patient with a suspected ulnar abutment syndrome. In this test, the patient sits in front of the examiner with the wrist in supination. The wrist is simultaneously ulnarly deviated and axially loaded while the forearm is supinated and pronated. The patient with an ulnar abutment syndrome experiences pain at the ulnocarpal joint, with or without popping and grinding, during this maneuver.

A variation of the ulnocarpal compression test is the Lester press test (Fig. 22-4).3 In this test, the patient sits in a chair with sturdy arms and lifts himself or herself off the chair seat. Pain at the ulnocarpal joint is considered pathognomonic for a TFCC tear.

TREATMENT

Arthroscopic Technique

Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Débridement: Mechanical

The standard 3-4 and 4-5 or 6-R wrist arthroscopy portals are used for TFCC débridement. These portals should be wide enough to permit the easy passage of instruments. A thorough and systematic examination of the radiocarpal, ulnocarpal, and midcarpal joints should be performed before débriding of the TFCC, as associated intrinsic and extrinsic ligament injury, articular derangement, or synovial pathology could affect the treatment plan. Ulnocarpal synovectomy should be performed to ensure clear visualization of that joint. The initial débridement of the radial, the palmar, and a portion of the dorsal aspect of the TFCC tear is accomplished with an arthroscope in the 3-4 portal while the instruments enter through the 4-5 portal. Small joint punches (straight and angled), graspers, mini-banana blades, and mini-hook knives are used to débride the TFCC. The suction punch is particularly useful. Care should be taken not to injure the overhanging lunate and triquetrum.

After the radial and palmar aspects of the TFCC have been débrided, the arthroscope is moved to the 4-5 portal. The débridement of the ulnar aspect of the triangular fibrocartilage is accomplished with passage of the instruments through the 3-4 portal. Three points must be kept in mind during débridement of the ulnar aspect of the TFCC. The first is to avoid injuring the attachment of the triangular fibrocartilage on its insertion at the base of the ulnar styloid. The second is to avoid injuring the dorsal or palmar radioulnar ligaments. If the ulnar attachment of the TFCC is transected or the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments are injured, distal radioulnar joint instability will result. The third point is to avoid scuffing the articular surfaces while passing the cutting or grasping instruments from the 3-4 portal across the radiocarpal joint and into the ulnocarpal joint.

The dorsal aspect of the TFCC tear usually can be débrided through the 3-4 and 4-5 portals. Occasionally, the instruments need to be passed through the 6-U portal while the arthroscope is placed in the 3-4 portal. Injury to the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve is avoided when using the 6-U portal with a longitudinal portal incision and blunt dissection to reach the ulnocarpal joint capsule.

After the TFCC has been débrided with the punches and knives, the rough edges of the débrided TFCC are smoothed with the full radius cutters. The 2.0-mm cutters are small but relatively ineffective, whereas the 2.9-mm cutters are effective but must be controlled to avoid collateral damage to the adjacent articular surfaces.

The end point of TFCC débridement is reached when the ulnar head is visible through the TFCC and a stable TFCC perimeter is created (Fig. 22-7). Typically, a central defect measuring at least 1 cm in diameter is created.

Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Débridement: Laser and Radiofrequency Technique

Mechanical débridement of the triangular fibrocartilage has been successful, although it can be challenging, particularly in regard to débridement of the ulnar and dorsal aspects of the triangular fibrocartilage tear. There are two potential problems with mechanical TFCC débridement. First, the passage of the instruments across the radiocarpal joint places those joints at risk for scuffing. Second, the proximity of the arthroscope to the operative site (TFCC) can distort the operator’s perception of the ulnocarpal joint.

The technique of laser-assisted triangular fibrocartilage débridement is similar to that of mechanical débridement of the triangular fibrocartilage, except that the arthroscope can be left in the 3-4 portal while the laser probe is kept in the 4-5 portal. The laser is set to 1.4 to 1.6 joules at a frequency of 15 pulses per second. With the help of a side-firing 70-degree laser tip, the triangular fibrocartilage can be very rapidly and precisely débrided. The 70-degree laser tip permits ablation of the radial and palmar portions of the TFCC tear, as well as the ulnar and dorsal components. There is no need to bring the laser probe in through the 3-4 portal.

Radiofrequency devices have become increasing popular for TFCC débridement because of their small probe size and relatively low cost. The technique is similar to that used for laser-assisted TFCC débridement. Monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency devices are currently in use. The instrument settings vary with the device. Monopolar probes have a theoretical disadvantage in that the energy imparted to the TFCC flows through the adjacent tissue in the direction of the grounding pad. This could lead to tissue damage beyond the TFCC. The flow of irrigation fluid must be sufficient to cool the joint when radiofrequency devices are used.

Arthroscopic Ulnar Shortening Technique

Arthroscopic ulnar shortening is accomplished by placing the arthroscope in the 3-4 portal and introducing the instruments through the 4-5 portal. Occasionally, the 6-U portal can be used, as can the distal radioulnar joint portal. Although the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is very useful for ulnar shortening, the barrel abrader can be used alone or in combination with the laser. If the Ho:YAG laser is used, it is introduced through the 4-5 portal, and the cartilage and subchondral bone of the ulnar seat of the distal ulna are rapidly vaporized (Fig. 22-8A). The laser becomes less efficient after the trabeculae of the distal ulna are visible. At that point, the 2.9-mm barrel abrader is brought in to finish the shortening (Fig. 22-8B). It is important to avoid injury to the sigmoid notch, and frequent fluoroscopic monitoring of the amount of bone resected is mandatory. Care must be taken to fully supinate and pronate the wrist to adequately débride the ulnar head. All instruments are removed at the end of the procedure, and the wrist is ulnarly deviated, axially loaded, supinated, and pronated to be sure no clicking or popping can be heard. If any clicking or popping emanates from the area of the surgery, further ulnar resection may be required. The goal of the surgery is to create an ulnar-minus variance of 2 mm (Fig. 22-9). Any irregularities of the remaining distal ulna should be minimized. Small irregularities, however, have a tendency to flatten out with the passage of time.

PEARLS& PITFALLS

CONCLUSIONS

The results of arthroscopic débridement of traumatic triangular fibrocartilage tears have been very good.5,6 However, Minami and colleagues7 found that degenerative tears (Palmer type 2) have a less favorable prognosis because of their associated ulnar wrist pathology. Our results8 and those reported by Osterman9 and Palmer10 suggest that arthroscopically assisted ulnar shortening in properly selected patients provides excellent or good results in more than 80% of cases.

REFERENCES

1. Kleinman WB. Stability of the distal radioulnar joint: biomechanics, pathophysiology, physical diagnosis, and restoration of function. What we have learned in 25 years. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1086-1106.

2. Palmer AK, Glisson RR, Werner FW. Relationship between ulnar variance and triangular fibrocartilage complex thickness. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:681-682.

3. Lester B, Halbrecht J, Levy IM, Gaudinez R. “Press test” for office diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears of the wrist. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:41-45.

4. Palmer AK, Glisson RR, Werner FW. Ulnar variance determination. J Hand Surg Am. 1982;7:376-379.

5. Husby T, Haugstvedt JR. Long-term results after arthroscopic resection of lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;35:79-83.

6. Infanger M, Grimm D. Meniscus and discus lesions of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC): treatment by laser-assisted wrist arthroscopy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:466-471.

7. Minami A, Ishikawa J, Suenaga N, Kasashima T. Clinical results of treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears by arthroscopic debridement. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:406-411.

8. Nagle DJ, Bernstein MA. Laser-assisted arthroscopic ulnar shortening. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:1046-1051.

9. Osterman AL. Arthroscopic debridement of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. Arthroscopy. 1990;6:120-124.

10. Wnorowski DC, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Anatomic and biomechanical analysis of the arthroscopic wafer procedure. Arthroscopy. 1992;8:204-212.