TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS, AND PREHOSPITAL AND EMERGENCY CENTER CARE

Published on 20/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 20/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1857 times

CHAPTER 24 TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS, AND PREHOSPITAL AND EMERGENCY CENTER CARE

Death. Long-lasting or even permanent loss of function. Those are the burdens borne by many traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and their families. Even some patients who initially appeared to have injuries that were mild according to clinical or radiographic criteria can suffer permanent injury.

Emergency craniotomies and insertion of intracranial monitors are the most high-profile aspects of management of TBI patients. However, the vulnerability of the injured brain to even mild and transient metabolic derangements underscores the major impact that systemic parameters can have on influencing outcome from TBI. Thus, non-neurosurgeons can influence management in ways that are just as important, and in some cases perhaps more so, than the interventions performed by neurosurgeons.

This chapter will discuss a few principles of the underlying pathophysiology, initial assessment, and prehospital and emergency center management of TBI patients. The following chapter addresses topics relevant to the acute hospital admission. This discussion is weighted toward patients with severe TBI, but many of the basic principles apply to patients with mild or moderate TBI as well.

INCIDENCE

It is frequently stated that in multiply injured patients, the head is the most commonly injured part of the body. Outcome from polytrauma is more dependent on the extent of brain injury than on injury to other organ systems. Perhaps a third of the entire cost of trauma, including medical and rehabilitative care, lost income to the patient, and lost productivity to society, is attributable to brain injury.

According to data reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the 1990s, 1.5 million Americans sustain a TBI every year. Of this number, hospitalization and ultimate survival occur in approximately 230,000 patients, but 50,000 will die. Long-term disability will occur in 80,000-90,000 patients annually. It has been estimated that more than 5 million men, women, and children in the United States are living with a permanent TBI-related disability.1

Motor vehicle crashes are the most common cause of TBI that produces hospitalization, whereas violence is the major cause of TBI-related deaths. Falls predominate as the leading cause of TBI in elderly patients. In 1990, gunshot wounds to the head overtook falls as the most common cause of TBI-related death in the United States.

The TBI death rate in the United States is approximately 20 per 100,000 population. In all age groups, the mortality rate is higher in males than in females. The incidence of TBI-related mortality peaks in the late teens and early twenties, subsequently decreasing during the next few decades until taking off exponentially at about retirement age.

MECHANISM OF INJURY

Although an epidural, subdural, or intraparenchymal hematoma may have a dramatic appearance on a computed tomography (CT) scan, the clinician must remember that these lesions are distinct from the cerebral parenchymal injury that is the true cause of long-term neurologic deficits. TBI is best thought of as a diffuse disturbance of cerebral function, not as a blood clot or contusion. This diffuse disturbance may occur in parallel with, but may also be independent of, those processes that lead to the development of traumatic mass lesions.

Subdural Hematoma

Classically, a subdural hematoma (SDH) (Figure 1) has been said to develop after tearing of a bridging vein, that is, a vein passing directly from the cortex to the overlying dura. The mechanical forces of the trauma can cause tearing of these veins. More recent evidence indicates that at least some of these hematomas actually form from splitting of inner and outer layers of the dura, that is, they may actually be “intradural hematomas.” Finally, some SDHs are caused by direct bleeding into the subdural space from parenchymal contusions or hematomas or from injured cortical arteries or veins.

Epidural Hematoma

Epidural hematomas (EDHs) classically arise after a blow to the side of the head results in a fracture of the thin temporal bone immediately overlying the middle meningeal artery. The patient may briefly lose consciousness after the initial impact, but he or she quickly awakens; thus, the brain injury was mild. Unfortunately, the fracturing of the skull lacerated the middle meningeal artery. Continued bleeding from this source produces an enlarging EDH, the presence of which may be signaled by such symptoms as severe and worsening headache, vomiting, and decreasing level of consciousness. The period between awakening from the initial concussion and subsequent lapsing into a coma has historically been described as a “lucid interval.” Importantly, loss of consciousness does not always occur after the skull is fractured, and many patients with large EDHs are awake until they begin to lapse into a terminal coma. It must also be mentioned that many EDHs are not associated with meningeal arterial bleeding. In these cases, perhaps the source of the hematoma is oozing from the overlying edges of fractured bone.

Referring again to the classic scenarios, patients with EDHs are said to fare better than patients with similarly sized SDHs. Why should this be so? The answer is that a “pure” EDH essentially represents a skull fracture with no direct parenchymal injury to the brain. On the other hand, the rotational forces that are said to be an important cause of SDHs via tearing of bridging veins may also cause widespread axonal injury, as discussed later. Thus, SDH is said to be associated with a greater burden of parenchymal injury, which explains the worse outcomes. Of course, this explanation refers only to the extreme ends of the spectrum of the pathophysiology of EDHs and SDHs. Many patients with EDHs will do poorly, while SDH patients often recover well from their injuries. Nevertheless, this explanation is a useful way to conceptualize the interactions between mass lesions and diffuse injury.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

The most common post-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage is not a mass lesion, but rather diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (see Figure 1). Several retrospective series report that SAH after TBI is independently associated with worse outcomes, but the mechanism that might explain such an association is unclear. In the acute setting, SAH does not seem to have much effect on patient management, which is driven instead by more immediately pressing concerns.

CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS

Clinical Examination

Buy Membership for Critical Care Medicine Category to continue reading. Learn more here