Transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty

Published on 05/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Otolaryngology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3108 times

Chapter 36 Transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty

1 INTRODUCTION

The ultimate goal of surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is to improve symptoms and eliminate disease morbidity and mortality. This is accomplished by altering airway sizecompliance and shape. Successful surgery eliminates collapseairflow limitation and airway obstruction during sleep. The precise features of successful versus unsuccessful surgery remain poorly understood.

The retropalatal airway segment is a major contributor to airway obstruction in sleep apnea. Although uvulopala-topharyngoplasty (UPPP)as described by Fujitaremains the most common OSA surgeryit suffers from technical failures including inexact patient selectionincorrect and flawed techniqueand external factors such as infection. To address palatal failurea different approach is required.

Transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty alters the retropalatal airway by advancing the palate forward. Hard palate is excised and a palatal advancement flap is created. It does not require excision of the soft palate. The palate is pulled forward and superior which conceptually is similar to maxillary advancement.

The procedure used alone or in combination with other soft tissue surgeries is indicated for sleep apnea patients having narrowing in the retropalatal airway. It is particularly useful when there is narrowing of the pharyngeal isthmus proximal to the point of palatal excision using traditional UPPP techniques. A transpalatal approach and advancement is also useful for obstructions in the nasopharynx (such as enlarged adenoids) that cannot be accessed through traditional techniques due to the difficult OSA anatomy.

2 SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

2.1 EVALUATION

Preoperativelynasopharyngeal endoscopy is currently the primary method of airway evaluation and is performed in both a sitting and supine body position. Features evaluated include sizeshapeareas of collapseand pharyngeal swallow. During endoscopyclose attention is focused on the size and the shape of the proximal pharyngeal isthmus. Narrowing of the airway proximal to this point of estimated excision of traditional UPPP is an indication for primary transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty. The shape of the pharyngeal isthmus indicates whether narrowing is from anterior–posterior compression (transversely shaped) or from collapse of the lateral walls (sagittally shaped). The locations of the levator muscle and palatopharyngeal sphincter are identified by visualizing the anterior fold of the torus tubarus (torus levatorius) which leads to the position of the levator muscle in the soft palate (Fig. 36.1). A narrow anterior to posterior airway at this level indicates retromaxillary airway narrowing. Such an abnormality cannot be addressed by traditional palatopharyngoplasty without aggressive excision of the levator muscle.

The retropalatal and retromaxillary airway is a fundamental abnormality of adults with sleep apnea. Normal upper airway shape and size must be learnedas well as patterns of stenosis and scarring of the retropalatal segment following palatal or tonsil surgeries. Swallow is also evaluated while performing endoscopy with specific attention to lateral wall motion. Impaired lateral wall motion may increase the risk of swallow dysfunction with any palatal surgery. Patients at high risk of pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (abnormal endoscopic examsymptomatic dysphagiavelopharyngeal insufficiencypresbyesophagussevere reflux and anterior cervical spine surgery) need further swallow evaluation. Fortunatelyeven in patients who have had prior UPPPpalatal and maxillary advancement are not usually associated with worsening of dysphagia.

Evaluation of the oropalatal airway is also needed. Since the palate relative to the tongue base is pulled forward a small oropalatal airway space may be worsened. This requires additional surgery even if the pharyngeal retroglossal airway space is not severely abnormal. The oropalatal airway is assessed initially with routine oral examination. A modified Malampatti 1 or 2 position indicates excellent oropalatal airway space. Modified Malampatti 3 and 4 have a compromised oropalatal airway. Those patients with very small oral airways who are primarily mouth breathers need this segment treated prior to palatal surgery.

Contraindications for the procedure include partial or complete cleft palateswallowing dysfunction with poor lateral wall movementa large torus palatini (requiring removal prior to advancement)velopharyngeal insufficiencyobligate mouth breathers (may worsen oral breathing)those who have severe gagor patients unable to accept the recovery from a complication. Maxillary advancement with LeFort osteotomies may in rare circumstances damage the greater palatine vessels and the blood supply to the maxilla. Palatal and tonsil surgery may also impair collateral blood flow to the maxilla andin the rare event this occursincrease the risk of avascular necrosis. Those likely to undergo maxillofacial surgery should have this issue discussed. Prior radiationtissue ablation (sclerotherapy or radiofrequency)and patients with extensive small vessel disease (diabetesheavy smokers) may increase the risk of wound breakdown. Surgeons should also have adequate resources to address oronasal fistula.

2.2 THE PROCEDURE

The procedure may be divided conceptually into steps including: (1) incision; (2) flap elevation; (3) palatal osteo-tomy; (4) tendinolysis; (5) palate advancement; (6) wound closure; and if needed (7) distal palatopharyngoplasty or tonsillectomy.

The procedure is performed under general anesthesia delivered oro-endotracheally. Patients are placed supine in the Rose position if tonsillectomy is also to be performedand operative exposure is obtained with a Dingman mouth gag (Pilling Instrument Co.PhiladelphiaPA). The Dingman mouth gag facilitates handling of multiple sutures during parts of the procedurebut is not needed for exposure and a normal ‘tonsil gag’ may also be used. Perioperative antibiotics (cephazolin 1–2 g and metronidaizole 500 mg) and dexametasone 10 mg are administered. For hemostasis1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is infiltrated into the exit of the greater palatine foramenthe planned incision sitesthe junction of the hard and soft palateand into the lateral tensor aponeurosis medial to the hamulus. In addition to the injection of the hard and soft palatenasal mucosa is augmented with oxymetazoline soaked pledgets placed along the floor of the nose which reduce bleeding from the nasal mucosa when placing drill holes and sutures.

2.1.1 INCISIONFLAP ELEVATION

See Figure 36.2.

A palatal incision is outlined beginning at the central hard palate posterior to the alveolus. The anterior extent of the flap should extend approximately 5 mm anterior to the planned osteotomy. The incision is at the junction of the thinner palatal mucosa and the thicker fibroadipose and muscular layer (Fig. 36.1). The incision goes immediately medial to the greater palatine foramen and is then flared laterally at the junction of the hard and soft palate to extend laterally over the area of the hamulus. This results in a curvilinear ‘omega arch’ appearance. An additional incision extends vertically up the midline of the hard palate (‘T’ incision). This allows for laterally based flaps which allow for more lateral and anterior exposure of the hard palate and reduce the need for a longer midline flap which is at risk of tip necrosis.

Lateral flaps are elevated off the bone to expose the proximal hard palate. The midline mucoperiosteal flap is elevated back to the junction of the hard and soft palate. During elevationthe central mucosa is usually thin and care must be taken to avoid tearing it. Laterally and posteriorlythe flap is thicker. Medial and posterior to the greater palatine foramenthe fibroadipose tissue is thicker and it is best bluntly dissected to avoid damage to the greater palatine vessels (a small mastoid curette which has both a curved blunt surface and sharp edge works well). The lesser palatine vessels and nerves may be transected with flap elevation. Bleeding is usually minimal if adequate time for hemostasis has been allotted and postoperatively sensation to the palate returns. Elevation of the flap beyond the border of the soft and hard palate to expose the soft palate is avoided. Care is taken to preserve the tendon and periosteal attachments of the soft palate to the posterior edge of the hard palate. Flap elevation must remain superficial to the tensor aponeurosis.

2.1.2 OSTEOTOMY, MOBILIZATION, TENDINOLYSIS, ADVANCEMENT AND CLOSURE

See Figure 36.3.

Two methods have been used to divide the hard and soft palate by separation with an osteotomy. The current method creates a small osteotomized segment that retains the peri-osteal and ligamentous attachments of the hard and soft palate. This osteotomy take a small additional time to perform but results in a stronger closure. Older methods that simply cut the soft tissue from the bone of the hard palate posterior junction using electrocautery required four to six sutures to close the wound and to advance the palate and were more traumatic to soft tissues. Oronasal fistula rates in the older technique were up to 10% or more. The ‘osteotomy method’ leaves 1 or 2 mm of bone at the posterior edge with attached periosteal and ligamentous fibers. Closure is stronger with only two sutures.

The hard and soft palates using a distal transverse osteo-tomy of the posterior hard palate 1–2 mm anterior to the soft palate using a small sagittal saw or drill. Lateral osteotomies are performed far laterally and as close to the alveolus as possible. A dorsal osteotomy with drill or heavy scissors separates the segment from the septum. The lateral and dorsal osteotomies are done with a small rotary burrsmall sagittal sawor heavy scissors. The tensor aponeurosis remains solidly attached to bone.

After the distal osteotomy is performed a posterior0.5–1.0 cm margin of the hard palate (palatine bone) is removed to provide space to move the soft palate anteriorly. Bone removal is performed with a rotary drill to remove residual bone and exposes the posterior nasal septum. Mucosa of the floor of the nose is kept intact at this point to allow for easier backwards elevation of the nasal mucosa off the floor of the nose. This elevation allows for the transpalatal sutures to remain submucosal. If not submucosalthere is a small risk of nasal granuloma in the postoperative period. Palatal drill holes are placed at a 45° angle to the palateextending from the oral surface of the palate into the nasal cavity. A strong segment (3–4 mm) of bone must be left between these drill holes and the excised bony margin. If the procedure is performed with nasotracheal intubationa small malleable retractor is placed in the floor of the nose for protection and drill holes and use of electrocautery must be done with caution to avoid damage to the tube.

The soft palate must be mobilizedto allow palate advancement. The tensor tendon is incised laterally medial to the insertion on the hamulus. Tendonolysis includes both the tensor tendon and if needed fascial bands of the anterior belly of the levator palatini muscle (Fig. 36.4). Visual-izing the nasopharynx is important to identify the lateral nasopharyngeal walls and other landmarks and to avoid inadvertent dissection and trauma into the lateral wall of the nasopharynx. Nasal mucosa is incised (with electrocautery) proximal and lateral to the osteotomy. Fibroadipose tissue is dissected medial to the hamulus to identify the white fibers of the tensor tendon. These are in close proximity to the nasopharyngeal muscosa and tendonolysis is best approached from the dorsal (nasopharyngeal) surface. With sharp or judicious electrocautery dissectionthe tensor tendon is identified and cut.

Two sutures (braided) are passed through the drill holes into the nasopharynx and around the osteotomy. Enough soft tissue is grasped with the suture to prevent slippage while tying. Two separate lateral sutures are placed in the tendon and lateral wound. These re-approximate the tensor tendon to the tissues around the hamulus. Identifying and placing sutures in the tendon (aponeurosis) and not just the fibroadipose tissue is critical. Sutures are tied while an assistant pulls the palate forward with a curved blunt instrument.

Excess or redundant tissue of the palate is present after advancement. The posterior flap is thicker than the original hard palate mucosa. Extra mucosa is not trimmed and is preserved for closure. The midline flap may be pulled anteriorly such in a ‘V’ and ‘Y’ advancement flap. Since central mucosa is thin and the posterior flap is thickwide back elevation of the palate mucosa is needed to close the wound. If the midline flap is too thicka small amount of palatal fibroadipose tissue may be sharply cut to thin the flap. The midline flap is closed with absorbable sutures and this closure especially with an arched hard palate may be technically challenging.

3 POSTOPERATIVE CARE AND COMPLICATIONS

A soft diet is begun on the first day. The use of an upper denture is avoided for at least 4 weeksor until healing is completed. If wound breakdown is notedan upper palatal splint to cover all or even part of the defect is used. If a splint is usedfistulas close. Attempts at secondary closure without a splint do not succeed. Splints may be easily fashioned (dentistdental labother) and worn with minimal impairment until healing has been achieved. Temporary sutures placed in the office using only local anesthesia may hold for several days and will relieve tension on the wound and speed closure. These can be placed through the transpalatal drill holes and into the soft palate in the office and can be replaced as needed.

Broad-spectrum perioperative antibiotics are used for 3–7 days. Perioperative steroids are given to reduce painpostoperative nauseaand edema for 1–3 days. To avoid compressions of the palatal flapdentures are avoided for 4–6 weeks. Due to the change in palatal shape with advancementdentures likely need to be refitmodifiedor replaced. A soft diet for 2 weeks decreases tension with swallow and gag. Close observation for development of oronasal fistula allows for early intervention and use of palatal splint.

Postoperativelyvelopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) has been rare. One case following aggressive UPPP is known to have occurred and was resolved with partial suture release. As with UPPPtransient symptoms of mild nasopharyngeal reflux or dysphagia may occur immediately postoperatively. Changes in pharyngeal volume or shape may alter triggering of swallow or may decrease bolus pressures and contribute to delayed pharyngeal clearance. Palatal flap necrosis and oronasal fistula may occur.

4 RESULTS

Early experience observed significant reductions in Apnea/Hypopnea Index (AHI) and Apnea Index (AI). A 67% successful response rate with a Respirators Disturbance Index (RDI) of less than 20 events/hour was observed in patients who only underwent transpalatal advancement.14 RDI in the responder group decreased from 52.8 to 12.3 events/hour. Seven of 11 patients (64%) had RDI reduced to less than 20 events/hour. Increased retropalatal size and decreased compliance have been observed. Photographic evaluation demonstrated increased velopharyngeal anterior posterior dimension and enlargement of the lateral pharyngeal ports.

More recently a controlled study compared a cohort of patients with palatal advancement to a matched historical group of UPPP patients who were all staged as Friedman stage 3. This group would be predicted to have an 8% success rate with UPPP alone. The palatal advancement group demonstrated significant improvement over UPPP. Controlling for Body Mass Indextongue base surgeryageand presurgical AHIthe odds ratio of success using palatal advancement over UPPP was 5.77 (95% CI of 1.80–17.98).

Scar tissue formation is less with palatal advancement and acute changes in snoring may also be less than UPPP or laser-assisted palatopharyngoplasty. In many caseswhen apnea and airflow limitation are resolved snoring dramatically improves. If snoring persiststhis has been successfully treated postoperatively with ancillary snoring procedures such as radiofrequency or implants.

FURTHER READING

Aboussouan et al. (1995) Aboussouan LS, Bolish JA, Wood BG, et al. Dynamic pharyngoscopy in predicting outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1995;107:941-946.

Caballero et al. (1998) Caballero P, Alvarez-Sala R, Garcia-Rio F. CT in the evaluation of the upper airway in healthy subjects and in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest. 1998;113:111-116.

Friedman et al. (2002) Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Bass L. Clinical staging for sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;127:13-21.

Fujita et al. (1998) Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, et al. Surgical correction of anatomic abnormalities of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89:923-934.

Ikematsu et al. (1987) Ikematsu T. Palatopharyngoplasty and partial uvulectomy method of Ikematsu: a 30 year clinical study of snoring. In: Fairbanks DNL, Fujita S, Ikematsu T, Simmons FB, editors. Snoring and Sleep Apnea. 1st edn. New York: Rivlin Press; 1987:130-134.

Katsantonis et al. (1993) Katsantonis GP, Moss K, Miyazaki S, et al. Determining the site of airway collapse in obstructive sleep apnea with airway pressure monitoring. Laryngoscope. 1993;103:1126-1131.

Li et al. (2001) Li KK, Troell RJ, Riley RW, Powell NB, Koester U, Guilleminault C. Uvulopalatopharyngoplastymaxillomandibular advancementand the velopharynx. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1075-1078.

Morrison et al. (1993) Morrison DL, Launois SH, Isono S, et al. Pharyngeal narrowing and closing pressures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148:606-611.

Shepard et al. (1990) Shepard JW, Thawley SE. Localization of upper airway collapse during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:1350-1355.

Sher et al. (1996) Sher AE, Schechtman KB, Piccirillo JF. The efficacy of surgical modifications for the upper airway in adults with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 1996;19:156-177.

Skatvedt (1992) Skatvedt O. Continuous pressure measurements in the pharynx and esophagus during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:1275-1280.

Skatvedt et al. (1996) Skatvedt O, Akre H, Godtlibsen OB. Continuous pressure measurements in the evaluation of patients for laser assisted uvulopalatoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;253:390-394.

Woodson (1997) Woodson BT. Retropalatal airway characteristics in UPPP compared to transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:735-740.

Woodson (1999) Woodson BT. Acute effects of palatopharyngoplasty on airway collapsibility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:82-86.

Woodson BT, Toohill RJ. Transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1993;103:269-276.

Woodson BT, Wooten MR. Manometric and endoscopic localization of airway obstruction after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111:38-43.

Woodson B.T., Robinson S., Lim H.J. Transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty outcomes compared to uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:211-217.