Chapter 51 Transotic Approach
Despite well-documented technical details,1 there is a general misconception equating the transotic approach with the transcochlear approach of House and Hitselberger.2 Significant differences exist between the two approaches in the extent of exposure, the management of the facial nerve, and the obliteration of the surgical cavity. As a natural extension of subtotal petrosectomy, which forms the basis of lateral and posterior skull base surgery at the University of Zurich,1 the transotic approach was initially designed for acoustic neuromas and has since expanded to include other pathology. Several modifications were also made over the years to optimize its use.3–5
INDICATIONS
Acoustic Neuroma
At the University of Zurich, tumors larger than 2.5 cm that cause significant brainstem compression are managed by the neurosurgery department as a matter of departmental policy. Small intracanalicular tumors in patients with good hearing (using the 50/50 rule of at least 50 dB hearing loss and 50% discrimination score) are managed through a middle cranial fossa (transtemporal-supralabyrinthine) approach (see Chapter 35).
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
The evaluation for retrocochlear lesions, such as acoustic neuromas, is standard at the University of Zurich and includes routine audiometry, auditory brainstem response, electronystagmography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium enhancement. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) is still performed for bony assessment of lesions within or invading the temporal bone. Facial nerve status is recorded clinically using the Fisch grading system6 and quantified by electroneuronography before surgery.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Surgical Site Preparation, Positioning, and Draping
The positioning and draping for this procedure are similar to positioning and draping described in Chapter 1, with some minor differences. The patient is secured in supine position on the Fisch operating table (see Chapter 35), with the head turned away from the surgeon. A large plastic bag is incorporated into the draping to catch excess irrigation and blood.
Skin Incision
A postauricular incision is placed along the hairline to keep it behind the operative cavity (Fig. 51-1). The incision is made from the mastoid tip to the temporal region for the surgical approach; its superior extension is made at the time of wound closure for the exposure of the temporalis muscle flap.
Blind Sac Closure of External Auditory Canal
A mastoid periosteal flap is developed while the postauricular skin flap is elevated. The external auditory canal is transected, and its skin is elevated, everted externally, and closed as a blind sac. A second layer of closure using the mastoid periosteal flap ensures a complete seal (Fig. 51-2).
Subtotal Petrosectomy: Exposure of Jugular Bulb and Petrous Carotid
A complete mastoidectomy is performed, and the remaining external auditory canal skin, tympanic membrane, and ossicles are removed in a stepwise fashion. The tympanic bone is progressively thinned out, and a complete exenteration of the pneumatic spaces (retrofacial, retrolabyrinthine, supralabyrinthine, hypotympanic, infralabyrinthine, and pericarotid) is carried out. Figure 51-3 shows the surgical cavity at the completion of this step. The middle fossa dura, sigmoid sinus, and jugular bulb are blue-lined; the fallopian canal and the vertical portion of the petrous carotid artery are skeletonized. The mastoid tip is removed to reduce the depth of the surgical cavity.
Exenteration of Otic Capsule
With the completion of subtotal petrosectomy, the surgical cavity is divided into two compartments by the fallopian canal (Fig. 51-4). Because the enlarged IAC lies mostly deep within the anterior compartment, the advantage of the transotic approach to access this region fully is clear.