Transforaminal Epidural Block and Selective Nerve Root Block

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4606 times

Chapter 6 Transforaminal Epidural Block and Selective Nerve Root Block

Transforaminal epidural block (TFEB) is defined as spread of an injectate through the epidural space as well as along the spinal nerve. It is used therapeutically because the injectate spreads into the anterior epidural space, which is the perceived target site of the disease. Local anesthetics with or without steroid can be used. TFEB injections can control inflammation and can stabilize sensitized nociceptive neural activity due to the many different pain sources originating in the spine.

TFEB requires a lower volume (1-3 mL) of injectate than conventional epidural block achieved by direct injection to the anterior epidural space. This smaller volume can decrease the toxicity from the injectate. No further injection is recommended if the first TFEB was not effective. If the initial response to TFEB is favorable but short-lived, a series of injections (3-6 times per year) or pulsed radiofrequency lesioning of the corresponding dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is recommended (see Chapter 7). The interval for sequential block varies from days to weeks for a series of injections.

Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is defined as spread of injectate not into the epidural space but along the spinal nerve. It is used for diagnostic purposes. SNRB can be used to define the source of pain and is especially useful when clinical findings and results of electrodiagnostic and imaging studies are equivocal. In addition, SNRB may be particularly useful in identifying the symptomatic level in patients with multilevel pathology.

Real-time fluoroscopic guidance during the injection of contrast material is essential. Provocation of paresthesia is not mandatory for SNRB. SNRB under fluoroscopic guidance or with use of a nerve stimulator guarantees a safe and precise block. Frequent checks of anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images with the fluoroscope are highly recommended to avoid direct trauma to spinal nerves.

Anatomy and procedures

Cervical Region

Anatomy

There are seven cervical vertebrae but eight cervical nerve roots. The first cervical nerve root is located between the occiput and the atlas, and each subsequent nerve root is located above its corresponding vertebra. If symptoms correlate with the seventh cervical nerve root, the C6-C7 foramen is the target for the block. The cervical neural foramen is a bony canal 4 to 5 mm long through which the cervical nerve roots pass anterolaterally (at about a 45-degree angle with respect to the coronal plane) and downward (at about a 10-degree angle with respect to the axial plane) (Figs. 6-1 to 6-4). Cervical spinal nerves from C3 to C7 exit the intervertebral foramen in the direction of the posterior, lower half of the foramen (Figs. 6-2 to 6-4). The cervical nerve roots occupy about one quarter to one third of the volume of the foramen and is accompanied by radicular arteries and veins (Figs. 6-1 and 6-2).

The vertebral artery at the caudal portion of the foramen is immediately anterior and medial to the ganglion (Figs. 6-1 to 6-4). In practice, the target points (red dots on Fig. 6-4) should lie directly over the dorsal part of the neural foramen so as to avoid vertebral artery injury.

Procedure

Transforaminal epidural block

4. A 22- or 25-gauge, 1.5-inch needle (or 3.5-inch spinal needle) is advanced to the target point (red circle on Fig. 6-5) by means of a tunnel vision technique. The target point is located posteriorly in the foramen, at the division between the caudal and middle thirds. Use of a short needle, when possible, provides better control.

Thoracic Region

Anatomy

Thoracic spinal nerves exit the intervertebral foramen in the direction of the posterior, upper half of the foramen [25]. The anatomy of the upper thoracic levels (T1-T8)—the shape of the lamina, the narrow spaces between ribs, and the wide bases of the transverse processes—makes it difficult to reach the intervertebral foramen. Accurate positioning of the straight cannula for the TFEB or SNRB procedure is consequently also difficult. Use of a curved needle makes it easy to position the cannula accurately.

Understanding the anatomy of the artery of Adamkiewicz is crucial to the procedure of TFEB or SNRB (Fig. 6-8) [26]. This artery is the largest of the radicular arteries supplying the lower two thirds of the spinal cord. It is mostly found from T9 to L1 (approximately 80% of cases). Injury to the artery of Adamkiewicz can result in devastating ischemia of the lower spinal cord, causing anterior spinal artery syndrome. Care should be taken in performance of these interventional pain procedures at the neural foramina from T9 to L1.

Procedure

Thoracic TFEB or SNRB should be performed with particular care and under fluoroscopic guidance to avoid penetration of the pleura.

Transforaminal epidural block

4. A 22- or 25-gauge, 3.5-inch, curved spinal needle is then advanced to the posterior surface of the vertebral body at the suspected symptomatic radicular level(s) in same direction of needle with fluoroscopic beam (Fig. 6-10B). And the needle depth is frequently checked on a lateral projection. Frequent checking is crucial to ensure that the needle tip does not enter the pleura (Fig. 6-10C).

Lumbar Region

Procedure

Transforaminal epidural block

Sacral Region

Procedure

Sacral Selective Nerve Root Block

3. The fluoroscope is rotated in the caudocephalad direction to align the L5 inferior end plate parallel to the S1 superior end plate in an AP projection, so as to give a clear picture of the sacral foramen of the target vertebra. The anterior foramen has a typically ellipsoid upper border. The posterior foramen often overlies the upper border of anterior foramen (Figs. 6-17 and 6-18A). If the expected fluoroscopic view is not clear, the fluoroscope should be rotated obliquely at a 5- to 10-degree angle with the sagittal plane. The skin entry point is identified and marked (Fig. 6-18A). The local anesthetic is administered at the skin entry site.
4. A 22- or 25-gauge, 3.5-inch, curved spinal needle is advanced under fluoroscope guidance to the overlying neural foramen by means of a tunnel vision technique (Fig. 6-18B). Contact of the needle with the posterior sacral bone before it enters the sacral foramen helps to confirm the depth and direction of the needle, thus avoiding placement of the needle through the anterior foramen and into the pelvis.
5. The needle is advanced until the patient experiences paresthesia or the needle tip is located 1 to 2 mm anterior to the posterior edge of the sacrum (Fig. 6-18C). Provocation of paresthesia is not mandatory for SNRB. Use of a nerve stimulator with SNRB guarantees a safe and precise block.

Postprocedural care and follow-up [17]

The AP and lateral images obtained with the fluoroscope during SNRB or TFEB should be saved after all procedures to document both contrast dye pattern and needle placement. All patients should be monitored with pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram before, during, and after the procedure. The patients should be observed in the recovery unit for at least 30 minutes, and for longer if there is a motor deficit. All patients are watched by the physician who performed the injection and by a registered nurse before discharge and are questioned about their pain levels, any new subjective weakness in the legs that developed after the procedure, and any other changes or complications resulting from the SNRB or TFEB.

Patients are seen for follow-up in the clinic 1 to 3 weeks later to watch for infection or other serious complications.

Signs and symptoms of infection after TFEB or SNRB are as follows:

Possibly more serious problems may cause the following signs and symptoms:

CASE STUDY 6.1 Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Block

Imaging Findings and Intervention Procedure

Simple cervical spine radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated degenerative right foraminal stenosis at C5-C6 and C6-C7 levels as well as compression of the right C6 and C7 nerve roots (Figs. 6-19 and 6-20). With the patient in the supine position, two block needles were introduced directly to the anterior border of the superior articular process via a right anterolateral approach (Fig. 6-21A). When the needles touched the target point, the needle tips were more carefully advanced, touching the posterior border of the neural foramen. When the needles reached the halfway point between the medial and lateral borders of the articular pillars in the anteroposterior projection, contrast dye was injected (Figs. 6-21B and 6-21C). After confirmation of the correct needle placement, 2 mL of a mixed solution of 0.19% ropivacaine and 20 mg of triamcinolone was injected at each site.

CASE STUDY 6.2 Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Block

Imaging Findings and Intervention Procedure

Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a remnant extruded disc herniation, causing compression of the thecal sac and left S1 nerve root (Figs. 6-22B and 6-22C). Epidurogram revealed significant obstruction of cephalad epidural spread of contrast at the left L5-S1 junction (Fig. 6-22D). Left L5 TFEB was performed under the fluoroscopic guidance. With the patient in the prone position, a 22-gauge spinal needle was introduced directly into the safe triangle using a tunnel vision technique in an oblique projection of C-arm, on which the “Scotty dog” formation appears. During the careful advance of the needle to the target point, AP and lateral fluoroscopic images were frequently checked to confirm the location of needle tip. When the needle touched the posterior border of the vertebral body in the lateral projection of C-arm, contrast medium was injected and followed by injection of 3 mL of a mixed solution of 0.19% ropivacaine and 40 mg of triamcinolone (Fig. 6-23).

References

1 Slipman C.W., Lipetz J.S., DePalma M.J., et al. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:446-454.

2 Slipman C.W., Lipetz J.S., Jacksom H.B., et al. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the neurosurgical treatment of atraumatic cervical spondylotic radicular pain: A retrospective analysis with independent clinical review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:741-746.

3 Gajraj N.M. Selective nerve root blocks for low back pain and radiculopathy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:243-256.

4 Rathmell J.P., Aprill C., Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of steroids. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1595-1600.

5 Depalma M.J., Bhargava A., Slipman C.W. A critical appraisal of the evidence for selective nerve root injection in the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1477-1483.

6 Lutz G.E., Vad V.B., Wisneski R.J. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: An outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1362-1366.

7 Botwin K.P., Gruber R.D., Bouchlas C.G., et al. Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transformational epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis: An outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:898-905.

8 Bhargava A., DePalmac M.J., Ludwigb S., et al. Injection therapy for lumbar radiculopathy. Curr Opin Orthop. 2005;16:152-157.

9 Vad V.B., Bhat A.L., Lutz G.E., et al. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: A prospective randomized study. Spine. 2002;27:11-16.

10 Delport E.G., Cucuzzella A.R., Marley J.K., et al. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with epidural steroid injections: A retrospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:479-484.

11 Blankenbaker D.G., Davis K.W., Choi J.J. Selective nerve root blocks. Semin Roentgenol. 2004;39:24-36.

12 Wolff A.P., Groen G.J., Crul B.J. Diagnostic lumbosacral segmental nerve blocks with local anesthetics: A prospective double-blind study on the variability and interpretation of segmental effects. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:147-155.

13 Patel V. Diagnostic modalities for low back pain. Semin Pain Med. 2004;2:145-153.

14 North R.B., Kidd D.H., Zahurak M., et al. Specificity of diagnostic nerve blocks: A prospective, randomized study of sciatica due to lumbosacral spine disease. Pain. 1996;65:77-85.

15 Sasso R.C., Macadaeg K., Nordmann D., et al. Selective nerve root injections can predict surgical outcome for lumbar and cervical radiculopathy: Comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:471-478.

16 Kelekis A.D., Somon T., Yilmaz H., et al. Interventional spine procedures. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:362-383.

17 Fenton D.S., Czervionke L.F. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003.

18 Windsor R.E., Falco F.J.E. Paraplegia following selective nerve blocks. Int Spinal Inject Soc Sci Newsl. 2001;4:53.

19 Huntoon M.A. Anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramina: Vulnerable arteries and ischemic neurologic injuries after transforaminal epidural injections. Pain. 2005;117:104-111.

20 Rozin L., Rozin R., Koehler S.A., et al. Death during transforaminal epidural steroid nerve root block (C7) due to perforation of the left vertebral artery. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003;24:351-355.

21 Furman M.B., Giovanniello M.T., O’Brien E.M. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2003;28:21-25.

22 Botwin K.P., Gruber R.D., Bouchlas C.G., et al. Complications of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1045-1050.

23 Houten J.K., Errico T.J. Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block: Report of three cases. Spine J. 2002;2:70-75.

24 Tiso R.L., Cutlerb T., Catania J.A., et al. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: The role of corticosteroids. Spine J. 2004;4:468-474.

25 Stolker R.J., Vervest A.C.M., Ramos L.M.P., et al. Electrode positioning in thoracic percutaneous partial rhizotomy: An anatomical study. Pain. 1994;57:241-251.

26 Alleyne C.H.Jr, Cawley C.M., Sphengelaia G.G., et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the artery of Adamkiewicz and its segmental artery. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:791-795.

27 Hasegawa T., Mikawa Y., Watanabe R., et al. Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1996;21:1005-1009.