Transcatheter Valve Therapies

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2508 times

17 Transcatheter Valve Therapies

Recent advances in percutaneous-based catheter technologies have allowed for development of novel therapies for valvular heart disease, including transcatheter valve implantation and transcatheter mitral valve repair (Table 17-1). Although these devices are still investigational in the United States, many have incorporated transcatheter valve procedures into their daily practice. This chapter briefly reviews two transcatheter valve procedures: transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

Table 17-1 Transcatheter Valve Therapies

Transcatheter Valve Implantation
Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Age-related calcific aortic valve degeneration is the most common cause of aortic stenosis (AS) in adults and its prevalence steadily increases with age. Survival in patients with AS dramatically decreases with onset of symptoms (angina, syncope, congestive heart failure) with an average of 1 to 3 years and the poorest survival seen in patients with failing left ventricles. Aortic valve replacement is a proven treatment to prolong survival in patients with severe AS.

Transcatheter Valves

There are two catheter-implantable valves commercially available overseas. They are the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve and the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (Fig. 17-1). The Edwards SAPIEN valve was studied in the PARTNER trial, which completed randomized enrollment in fall 2009. The Medtronic CoreValve randomized trial started enrollment in December 2010. The initial international experience and the results of PARTNER cohort A and B suggest that outcomes compare favorably with conventional valve surgery in selected patients. In November 2011, the Edwards SAPIEN valve was FDA approved and became commercially available in the United States for PARTNER cohort B (inoperable) patients.

Patient Selection

A thorough clinical evaluation of the patient is performed with special attention to vascular access and potential sources of complications. The evaluation includes history and physical examination, laboratories, chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, pulmonary function testing, carotid ultrasound, right and left cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The CTA is performed to assess aortoiliac patency, dimensions, and tortuosity. Occlusive peripheral arterial disease, small vessels (<7 mm), and excessive tortuosity are characteristics that would preclude a transfemoral approach since the delivery systems for the SAPIEN valve are currently 22F and 24F sheaths for the 23-mm and the 26-mm valves, respectively. The second-generation Edwards valve, SAPIEN XT, is comprised of a cobalt chromium frame and allows for an 18F delivery system. Patients with unfavorable aortoiliac characteristics can have TAVR via a transapical approach with the Edwards valve. The advantage of the CoreValve system is the smaller 18F profile of its delivery system, but CoreValve can be delivered only in a retrograde fashion. If femoral access is not available, CoreValve may be delivered from subclavian and carotid approaches.

Risk of mortality is calculated using a validated scoring method such as the EuroScore or Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score. Online calculators are available for both scores. These scores take patient characteristics (e.g., age, acuity, pulmonary function, renal function, neurologic function, type of surgery) to calculate risk of mortality and morbidity. An STS score of >10% mortality was an inclusion criterion in the PARTNER trial.

Transfemoral TAVR Procedure With Edwards SAPIEN valve

The procedure is typically performed in a cardiac catheterization laboratory or hybrid operating room suite. The implant procedure involves the cooperation of a multidisciplinary team, including cardiac surgery, interventional cardiology, echocardiography, and anesthesia. A surgical team and cardiopulmonary bypass machine are on stand-by in case bailout surgery is required.

Preprocedure planning includes identification of the implant side from the CTA scan and measurement of the aortic annulus to choose valve size, which will determine the size of the delivery system. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is used to size the annulus and to assist in valve positioning. Placement of the probe can be done once the patient is adequately sedated. A 23-mm valve is used for annular dimensions of 18 to 21 mm and a 26-mm valve is used for annular dimensions of 22 to 24 mm.

Femoral arterial and venous accesses are obtained on the non-implant side, and 6F sheaths are placed. These will be used for the temporary pacemaker (rapid pacing) and pigtail catheter (aortography), but they also provide rapid access in case the patient needs to be placed on emergency cardiopulmonary bypass. Pulmonary artery catheterization is done via jugular vein access. Due to the large delivery systems, surgical femoral artery cutdown and repair are best performed on the implant side. After cutdown, an 8F sheath is placed in the artery and a 6F sheath in the vein. Successful arterial closure with a Prostar XL closure device or two Perclose closure devices has been performed, making the procedure truly percutaneous. Weight-based heparin is administered intravenously once access has been obtained. Target activated clotting time (ACT) is 250 to 300 seconds.

A temporary pacemaker wire (used for rapid ventricular pacing during balloon inflations) is positioned in the right ventricle through the venous sheath on the non-implant side. A pigtail catheter is advanced to the ascending aorta and supravalvular aortography is performed in the left anterior oblique cranial and right anterior oblique caudal projections. The projection that best lays out all three aortic valve leaflets in a single plane is chosen for valve positioning.

The implant-side arterial access must be serially dilated with hydrophilic-coated dilators over a stiff 0.038-inch guidewire. From 8F, the artery is serially dilated with 10F to 24F dilators. The delivery sheaths for the 23-mm and 26-mm valves are 22F and 24F, respectively. The delivery sheath is advanced over the wire and positioned in the abdominal aorta.

The stenotic aortic valve is crossed using standard technique. After crossing the valve with the straight wire, the catheter is advanced into the left ventricle (LV) and the straight wire is exchanged for an Amplatz super stiff (1-cm tip) guidewire with a pigtail curve. A double-lumen pigtail catheter is advanced over this wire and positioned in the LV. Baseline LV-aortic gradient is measured. The stiff wire is then advanced into the left ventricle, and the pigtail catheter is exchanged for the valvuloplasty balloon. The balloon (typically 20 × 40 mm) is positioned across the aortic valve, rapid ventricular pacing at 180 bpm is initiated, and the balloon is inflated once the systolic blood pressure has fallen below 50 mm Hg (5-sec inflation). The balloon catheter is removed with the stiff wire remaining in the LV.

Next, the RetroFlex 3 delivery prosthetic valve system with the crimped SAPIEN valve is advanced through the delivery sheath over the stiff wire. The delivery system has a flexing mechanism that assists in steering through the aortic arch and minimizes trauma on the outer curvature of the arch (Fig. 17-2). When crossing the native aortic valve, the delivery system is fully retroflexed, which gives a central and coaxial orientation of the prosthesis to the native valve. The delivery catheter also has a nose cone, which facilitates crossing of the native valve (Fig. 17-3). After the valve has been crossed, the retroflex catheter is retracted to fully expose the delivery balloon. The valve is positioned using fluoroscopy, aortography, and TEE (Fig. 17-4). Approximately 60% of the valve assembly should be on the ventricular side of the aligned sinuses. Once positioning is confirmed, rapid pacing is performed and the delivery balloon is inflated when the blood pressure falls below 50 mm Hg (Fig. 17-5). The balloon is inflated for 5 seconds, then deflated. After stent valve deployment, aortography is repeated to assess for paravalvular leak, and if significant, repeat balloon inflations may be necessary. The double-lumen pigtail catheter is again placed and final LV-aortic gradients are measured.

Potential complications of TAVR are listed in Table 17-3.

Table 17-3 Complications From TAVR

TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

The mitral valve is composed of two leaflets (anterior and posterior), the mitral annulus, the chordae, and the papillary muscles (Fig. 17-6). Dysfunction of any of these structures can cause incompetence of the valve and result in regurgitation. Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of valvular heart disease, and about half of the cases are due to myxomatous degeneration of the valve, which leads to stretching of the valve leaflets and chordae tendineae. Elongation of these structures causes prolapse of the leaflets into the left atrium and failure of the leaflets to coapt properly. If left untreated, severe MR leads to LV failure due to chronic volume overload.

Surgical mortality is significantly better when the mitral valve is repaired rather than replaced. With mitral valve replacement, the mitral valve apparatus is disrupted, which causes adverse effects on LV geometry, volume, and function. Therefore, whenever possible, all efforts should be made to repair the valve and preserve the subvalvular apparatus. In the Euro Heart Survey, almost half of the patients with severe MR were denied surgery. Impaired LV function, older age, and comorbidity were associated with surgery denial.

Percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve therapies have evolved less rapidly when compared to the aortic and pulmonary valves. Endovascular access is more difficult with transcatheter mitral valve therapies since a transseptal puncture is required to have access to the mitral valve. More importantly, the inherent complexity of the mitral valve apparatus poses a challenge to catheter-based techniques. Any derangement of one or more of its components may result in significant valvular dysfunction. A clear understanding of these anatomical and functional properties becomes essential when distinguishing the pathophysiologic mechanisms that differentiate primary from secondary valvular disease as well as in the development of surgical and new alternative percutaneous transcatheter therapies.

There are numerous transcatheter mitral valve repair strategies that have been developed over the recent years. These include leaflet repair, direct and indirect annuloplasty, and ventricular and annular remodeling devices (see Table 17-1).

The MitraClip (Fig. 17-7) currently represents the most widely used percutaneous repair technique. In 1991, Dr. Alfieri performed a mitral valve repair without annuloplasty using a stitch “edge-to-edge” technique to create a double-orifice valve. The durability of this procedure (>1500 patients) led to the development of a percutaneous technique using a clip to approximate the valve leaflets instead of a suture. The MitraClip system has been evaluated in the EVEREST I and EVEREST II studies.

Indications

Patients with a class I indication for mitral valve surgery according to the AHA/ACC 2006 guidelines for valvular heart disease were eligible for the EVEREST studies (Table 17-4). Mitral valve surgery is indicated in all symptomatic patients with severe MR in the absence of severe LV dysfunction and/or LV end-systolic dimension >55 mm (Class I recommendation, Level of Evidence: B). In asymptomatic patients with severe MR, mitral valve surgery is indicated if LV dysfunction is present (Class I recommendation, Level of Evidence: B). Additionally, patients with severe MR and new onset of atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension were also candidates.

Table 17-4 Inclusion Criteria for MitraClip

EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

MitraClip Procedure

The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia with the use of fluoroscopy and TEE for device guidance. The right femoral vein is accessed and an 8F sheath is inserted. Right heart catheterization is then performed.

Transseptal puncture is then performed using standard technique via the right femoral vein. Heparin is administered after transseptal puncture with a goal ACT of >300 seconds. The steerable guide catheter is 24F proximally and 22F at the atrial septum. The transseptal sheath is exchanged for the guide catheter and tapered dilator. The clip delivery system is advanced through the guide catheter and into the left atrium. Controls on the guiding catheter allow deflection of the distal tip. The clip delivery system has two dials that permit medial-lateral and anteroposterior steering. Using fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance, the MitraClip is steered until axially aligned and centered over the origin of the regurgitant jet. The clip is opened to extend the two arms and advanced into the LV below the mitral leaflets. The clip is retracted so that each leaflet is grasped by an extended arm and then closed to coapt the mitral leaflets. The inner portion of the clip has two “grippers” adjacent to each arm to secure the leaflets as the clip is closed. Leaflet insertion into the clip and MR reduction are assessed by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. If reduction in MR is not adequate, the clip can be re-opened releasing the leaflets, and the clip can be repositioned. After adequate reduction of MR has been achieved, the clip is deployed and the delivery system and guide catheter are removed.

Complications from the MitraClip procedure are listed in Table 17-5.

Table 17-5 Complications From MitraClip

Clinical Results

The clinical experience with the MitraClip (n = 1115) include (1) EVEREST I, feasibility nonrandomized trial (n = 55); (2) EVEREST II, prerandomization (n = 60); (3) EVEREST II, high registry (n = 78); (4) EVEREST II, pivotal, 2:1 randomization to MitraClip vs. surgery (n = 279); (5) REALISM, continued Access High Risk & Non High Risk (n = 266); and (6) European Experience (n = 472).

In EVEREST I, 27 patients with a mean age of 69 years were enrolled. Of the 24 patients in whom the MitraClip was successfully deployed, 67% had less than 2+ MR upon discharge. At 30 days, MR severity grade decreased from 3.7 to 1.6. One patient experienced a stroke, and three others developed clip detachment without embolization. There were no cases of emergent cardiac surgery, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, or septicemia. Furthermore, ability to undergo surgical repair was preserved in those who, at the 30-day follow-up, had inadequate MR control.

The randomized arm of EVEREST II enrolled 279 patients at 37 sites. These patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to the MitraClip procedure versus mitral valve surgery. In terms of safety, the major adverse event rate in the MitraClip arm was 9.6% versus 57.0% in the surgery arm (P < 0.0001). The safety benefit with device closure was largely driven by higher blood transfusion requirements >2 units in the surgery arm (53.2% vs. 8.8%).

In terms of effectiveness, the noninferiority hypothesis was met with the clinical success rate in the MitraClip arm being 72.4% versus 87.8% in the surgery arm (pNI = 0.0012). At 12 months, MR reduction was greater in the surgery arm with 97% of patients with less than 2+ MR versus 81.5% in the device arm. Despite this, more patients in the device arm had NYHA functional class I or II versus the surgical arm (97.6% vs. 87.9%; P < 0.0001). Two-year data from the EVEREST II trial were presented in April 2011 showing that treatment with MitraClip remained effective (composite end point of freedom from death, no new mitral valve surgery, and MR lower than pretreatment minimum of 3+) compared to surgery at the 2-year follow-up. The data from EVEREST II suggest that percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system is a viable alternative to surgery in those patients with mitral valve anatomy amenable to mechanical coaptation.

In a substudy of the EVEREST I and II trials looking at patients with functional MR, MitraClip not only reduces the severity of MR but also stimulates reverse left ventricular remodeling. LV chamber size decreased significantly at the 1-year follow-up, suggesting the presence of reverse remodeling. Acute procedural success, defined as freedom from MR > 2+ was 89%; in the 12 of 19 patients for whom the 1-year follow-up was complete, freedom from death, surgery for valve dysfunction, and MR > 2+ was 79% after 12 months. NYHA class and measures of reverse remodeling showed significant improvement in the follow-up period.