Thromboembolic Phenomena and Vegetations

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2038 times

15 Thromboembolic Phenomena and Vegetations

Background

Thrombi and vegetations may result in clinical symptoms when embolism occurs. Vegetations may result in clinical symptoms when significant valve destruction occurs or with systemic symptoms such as fever and malaise. Tumors may also present clinically due to embolism, but tumors are not covered in this section.

Thrombus

The left atrium (LA) (especially the left atrial appendage [LAA] [Fig. 15-1]) is a common area of thrombus formation when associated with atrial arrhythmias or mitral stenosis.

Vegetations

Noninfectious vegetations may also occur and are commonly referred to as marantic or nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). NBTE usually occurs in the context of a malignancy or autoimmune disease (Fig. 15-5). A metastatic malignancy does not necessarily have to be present. Although blood cultures and an accurate determination of whether the patient was exposed to antibiotics at the time of blood sampling for culture are essential in identifying vegetations as infectious or noninfectious, there are some imaging characteristics of NBTE: vegetations tend to be less mobile, more sessile, and located toward the base of the leaflets. Because the base of the valve leaflets is more commonly affected, less severe valve regurgitation is noted. Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with NBTE.
Mobility and location are important distinguishing features of a vegetation. Vegetations have motion independent of a valve leaflet and are most commonly associated with the upstream surface of a valve leaflet (e.g., the right atrial side of the tricuspid valve [Fig. 15-6]) but have also been reported on the Eustachian valve, residual Chiari network, subvalvular apparatus, and chamber wall. Commonly, the vegetations are not rounded in appearance. Vegetations usually have low reflectance of ultrasound waves but over time may become more calcified (high reflectance). Visualization of vegetations in more than one ultrasound window decreases the likelihood of an ultrasound artifact.

A more detailed discussion of the evaluation of endocarditis can be found in Chapter 14 of the Echocardiography Review Guide by C. M. Otto and R. G. Schwaegler.

Overview of Echocardiographic Approach

In many infants and young children, transthoracic acoustic windows are typically adequate enough that the structures of the heart are well visualized and there is little incremental benefit to transesophageal echo (TEE). TEE should be considered when transthoracic findings are equivocal or if specific structures of the heart are not well visualized. TEE may also be useful in guiding the surgical approach.

Anatomic Imaging

Alternate Approaches

As with echo, MRI uses different imaging techniques to answer clinical questions. Cine MRI allows improved visualization of the cardiac apex when an ultrasound window is poor or when visualizing the cardiac apex by echo is limited by lung or rib interference. Cine MRI also allows improved endocardial delineation (Fig. 15-14). Contrast-enhanced MRI can help distinguish normal adjacent myocardium from thrombus on the basis of tissue characterization (Fig. 15-15). MRI angiography may also be helpful for distinguishing thrombus by looking for filling defects within the LAA.

Suggested Reading

1 Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:884-900.

2 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardvascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:e1-e148.

3 Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:975-1014.

4 Otto CM, Schwaegler RG. Echocardiography Review Guide. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007.