The small and large intestine

Published on 14/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 5134 times

16 The small and large intestine

Surgical anatomy and physiology

Anatomy and function of the small intestine

The small bowel extends from the pylorus to the ileocaecal valve and ranges in length from 3 to 9 metres. The jejunum, which comprises two-fifths of the small intestine, is of wider calibre than the ileum, and the diameter of the gut lumen narrows progressively from the duodenojejunal flexure to the ileocaecal valve. The small bowel mucosa is supported on a

strong submucosa and comprises a single layer of columnar cells in a villiform structure that dramatically increases the absorptive surface area. Columnar glandular epithelium is interspersed with mucus-secreting cells, Paneth cells and amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) cells derived from the neural crest. Between the inner layer of circular muscle and the outer longitudinal layer runs Auerbach’s myenteric plexus, which comprises vagal parasympathetic fibres and sympathetic fibres from the lesser and greater splanchnic nerves. This plexus controls orderly propulsive contractions of the muscular layers of the gut wall. The sympathetic nervous system mediates the sensation of visceral pain, and a submucosal plexus (Meissner’s plexus) of autonomic nerves innervates the glandular cells in the epithelium.

The small intestine is supplied by the superior mesenteric artery, which runs in the root of the small bowel mesentery, supplying the bowel by a series of arterial arcades (Fig. 16.1). These midgut vessels communicate with the coeliac axis through the pancreaticoduodenal arcade. The superior mesenteric supply also communicates with that of the inferior mesenteric artery by contributing to the colonic marginal artery through the left branch of the middle colic artery, which joins to the ascending branch of the left colic artery. Venous blood drains via the superior mesenteric vein to the portal vein. Lymphoid aggregates in the submucosa (Peyer’s patches) are more numerous in the ileum, and lymph drains to regional nodes in the root of the mesentery before passing to the cisterna chyli.

The principal function of the small bowel is absorption of amino acids, short peptides, sugars and fats, as well as minerals, vitamins and other micronutrients. Its secretory and digestive functions supplement those of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The mucosa is thrown into circular folds (plicae semilunares) and is carpeted by finger-like villi, giving an absorptive area of 200–500 m2. Some 5–8 litres of fluid enter the jejunum each day, of which only 1–2 litres normally pass to the colon.

Anatomy and function of the large intestine and appendix

The principle function of the large intestine is water absorption, particularly the proximal colon. The left colon and rectum act as a reservoir until defaecation is appropriate. Mucus is secreted as a lubricant. The large bowel mucosa consists of columnar epithelium interspersed with mucus-secreting goblet cells. The villi are shorter than those of the small intestine, and crypts pass down to the muscularis mucosa, which is supported by a strong submucosa. The large bowel extends from the ileocaecal valve to the upper anal canal (approximately 1.6 metres). The caecum is a blind pouch at the most proximal part of the large bowel. The transverse and sigmoid colon are mobile because they have a mesentery, whereas ascending and descending colon are only partially peritonealized. The true rectum is demarcated by coalescence of the taeniae coli of the sigmoid colon to form a continuous outer muscular tube. The upper third of the rectum has peritoneal cover on its front and sides, the middle third is peritonealized only anteriorly and the lower third is wholly extraperitoneal.

The inferior and superior mesenteric arteries supply the colon and anastomose via a marginal artery (Fig. 16.2) that allows collateral supply in the event of arterial occlusion, but at the splenic flexure this arterial communication may be tenuous. The superior rectal artery is the continuation of the inferior mesenteric artery, supplying the rectum and anastomosing with the middle and inferior rectal arteries (branches of the internal iliac arteries). The inferior mesenteric vein drains into the splenic vein. Lymph channels run along the course of the arterial supply, draining to epicolic and paracolic nodes close to the bowel wall, and to regional nodes at the origin of the superior and inferior mesenteric vessels (Fig. 16.2). Lymph from the rectum drains upwards to superior rectal and inferior mesenteric nodes, whereas anal canal lymph drains to inguinal nodes. Knowledge of the lymphatic drainage has considerable relevance to surgical lymphadenectomy performed as part of radical cancer clearance, as well as to radiotherapy for rectal and anal cancers.

The appendix is lined by colonic epithelium but has no known function in humans. The submucosa contains prominent lymphoid follicles in childhood that regress in adolescence. In older patients, the lumen may be obliterated by fibrosis. The appendix projects from the medial wall of the caecum some 2 cm below the ileocaecal junction as the taeniae coli converge on the root of the appendix.

Clinical assessment of the small and large intestine

History

Painful contraction of the midgut (supplied by the superior mesenteric artery: small bowel, right and part transverse colon) due to obstruction or inflammation results in peri-umbilical colic. Disorders affecting the large bowel, i.e. hindgut (supplied by the inferior mesenteric artery: from distal transverse colon to rectum), are frequently associated with ill-defined lower abdominal colicky pain. Nausea, vomiting and pain are early and predominant features of many small bowel disorders, particularly obstruction. In contrast, large bowel conditions may present with poorly defined features including abdominal distension and altered bowel habit; vomiting is a late feature. Normal bowel frequency ranges from one motion in 3 days, up to 3 motions/day. The passage of blood or mucus per rectum is a common feature of large bowel disease. It is important to differentiate ‘outlet-type’ bleeding from sinister blood loss, when the blood is mixed with the stool and there may be associated altered bowel habit or tenesmus. Outlet bleeding is typically bright red and may be present only on toilet paper or spattered in the pan, separate from the stool. There may be associated perianal pain, due to fissure or prolapsed piles. Blood originating from the distal bowel is usually bright red, whereas blood coming from the upper gastrointestinal tract is usually altered by gut bacteria and becomes black (melaena). Weight loss, malaise and anaemia are common non-specific features of intestinal disease.

Investigation of the luminal gastrointestinal tract

Investigation of diarrhoeal illnesses should include stool culture with sensitivities, tests for Clostridium difficile toxin as well as cysts, ova and parasites. Imaging modalities for small bowel investigation comprise plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enteroclysis, barium follow-through, small bowel enema, computed tomography (CT), fibreoptic enteroscopy, capsule video-endoscopy, labelled white cell radionuclide scanning and labelled red cell radionuclide scanning. The terminal ileum can be inspected at colonoscopy, double-contrast barium enema frequently allows visualization of the terminal ileum, and a pneumocolon technique can also be used with barium follow-through to obtain double-contrast views of the terminal ileum. Duodenal biopsy undertaken at upper gastrointestinal video-endoscopy to identify the characteristic subtotal villous atrophy is the gold standard investigation of suspected coeliac disease. However, coeliac disease is frequently diagnosed by serum ELISA assays for auto-antibodies, including anti-endomysial, IgA anti-gliadin or tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies. Tests of absorptive capacity are now rarely used. Bacterial overgrowth can be assessed using the glucose breath test, 14C-xylose and 14C-glycocholate breath tests. Small bowel aspiration can be carried out by nasojejunal tube or at enteroscopy for bacterial culture. Faecal calprotectin is a non-specific test of intestinal inflammation that can be used to monitor inflammatory bowel disease activity.

Direct inspection of the large bowel includes proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. These techniques allow biopsy and snare removal of colorectal polyps using cauterizing diathermy. Plain radiography is used extensively in the emergency situation but is seldom of value in elective investigation. CT double contrast radiography of the large bowel has largely superseded double contrast barium enema to allow inspection of the mucosa. CT also has considerable utility in the assessment of the acute abdomen. CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis is routinely used in staging of colon and rectal cancer, along with MRI for rectal cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) after administering a fluoride18 labelled tracer (fluorodeoxyglucose) that is metabolized by tumours (FDG-PET CT) has recently been introduced, although it is generally reserved for staging of complex colorectal cancer cases being considered for more major multiorgan resections. Colonic transit can be assessed in cases of suspected megacolon or slow-transit constipation by administering radio-opaque markers to estimate large bowel transit.

Principles of operative intestinal surgery

The crucial role of the small bowel in maintaining nutrition requires that resectional surgery should aim to retain the maximum possible length of bowel. Ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease may result in gallstone formation and megaloblastic anaemia, owing to poor absorption of bile salts and vitamin B12. Conversely, loss of the entire large bowel can be tolerated with little impact on nutritional status, but occasionally water and salt depletion can occur, especially in hot climates.

Small intestinal anastomoses heal well, owing to their excellent blood supply and rich submucosal arteriolar plexus. Small bowel content clears after 12 hours of fasting and so no specific bowel preparation, apart from fasting, is required for planned small bowel resection. The large intestine microcirculation consists of a series of small end-arteries, which, combined with the presence of faeces with a high density of bacterial colonization, results in poor anastomotic healing compared to those of the small intestine. This produces a higher anastomotic leak rate for colocolic or colorectal anastomoses.

In the emergency setting there is an increased risk of anastomotic leakage and so there is a lower threshold for the formation of a stoma. In specialist centres, every effort is made to reconstitute large bowel continuity in both elective and emergency resectional surgery. In emergency surgery for left-sided colonic obstruction or perforation, a total colectomy with anastomosis of the ileum to the rectum may be considered to avoid a colorectal anastomosis in the presence of faecal loading. Segmental left-sided resection and the formation of a colostomy (Hartmann’s operation) avoids an anastomosis, but many specialist colorectal surgeons prefer left-sided resection with primary anastomosis.

There has been a move away from mechanical bowel preparation for elective large bowel resections because of lack of beneficial effect in research trials. Low-residue diet prior to surgery has an important place, while antibiotic prophylaxis is essential, comprising a single dose of a broad-spectrum antibiotic to cover coliform bacteria, in combination with metronidazole to cover anaerobic bacteria.

Disorders of the appendix

Appendiceal tumours

Inflammatory bowel disease

In view of the similarities in clinical presentation and in some aspects of management, it is useful to discuss Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis together (Table 16.1). Ulcerative colitis affects the colon and rectum exclusively, whereas Crohn’s disease may affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Inflammation is restricted to the mucosa in ulcerative colitis but transmural inflammation is a hallmark of Crohn’s disease. There are also important implications for prognosis, as surgery for ulcerative colitis is curative, whereas Crohn’s disease frequently follows a relapsing course, despite medical or surgical intervention.

Table 16.1 Clinical features of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.

  Crohn’s disease Ulcerative colitis
Incidence 5–7 per 100 000 and rising 10 per 100 000 and static
Extent May involve entire gastrointestinal tract Limited to large bowel
Rectal involvement Variable Almost invariable
Disease continuity Discontinuous (skip lesions) Continuous
Depth of inflammation Transmural Mucosal
Macroscopic appearance of mucosa Cobblestone, discrete deep ulcers and fissures Multiple small ulcers, pseudopolyps
Histological features Transmural inflammation, granulomas (50%) Crypt abscesses, submocosal chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate, crypt architectural distortion, goblet cell depletion, no granulomas
Presence of perianal disease 75% of cases with large bowel disease; 25% of cases with small bowel disease 25% of cases
Frequency of fistula 10–20% of cases Uncommon
Colorectal cancer risk Elevated risk (relative risk = 2.5) in colonic disease 25% risk over 30 years for pancolitis
Relationship with smoking Increased risk, greater disease severity, increased risk of relapse and need for surgery Protective, first attack may be preceded by smoking cessation within 6 months

Crohn’s disease

Although originally described as a disease affecting the terminal ileum, any part of the gastrointestinal tract can be involved, from mouth to anus. In 50% of cases both small and large bowel are involved, whereas in 25% of cases large bowel alone is affected. The incidence is increasing in developed countries and the annual incidence rate is currently 5–7 cases per 100 000 in the UK population. At the time of initial clinical presentation, the features of Crohn’s disease may be indistinguishable from those of ulcerative colitis. Indeed, in cases of colonic Crohn’s disease, it may be difficult to differentiate the two conditions, even after resection and histological assessment.

Cigarette smoking is the single most important risk factor for developing the disease, and is associated with increased disease severity and frequency of relapse, as well as the need for surgical intervention. However there is a substantial heritable component to the disease. There is also evidence for the involvement of immunological factors and the gut bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Recently, over 30 genetic loci have been identified that each contribute a small effect in host–bacteria interaction. These include CARD15 (NOD2), dysregulation of adaptive immunity (IL23R), and deficient autophagy (ATG16L1, IRGM).

Clinical features

Crohn’s disease is a chronic disorder with exacerbations, remissions and a varied clinical presentation. Continuous or episodic diarrhoea is associated with recurring abdominal pain and tenderness, lassitude and fever. Declining general health, malabsorption and weight loss, with failure to thrive and to reach developmental milestones, are common in affected children.

Examination may reveal malnutrition and there may be a palpable abdominal mass. There may be features of subacute intestinal obstruction, and this may be due to active disease, stricturing of ‘burnt-out’ disease, or adhesions from previous surgical intervention. Fistula formation occurs in 20% of patients with small and large bowel disease, but less in those with disease restricted to the large bowel. Fistulae may communicate with adjacent loops of bowel, other viscera (e.g. bladder, vagina) or the skin. External fistulae may result from surgical intervention and commonly involve the anterior abdominal wall or perineum (Fig. 16.4). Abscesses can result from chronic bowel perforation, but free perforation is relatively uncommon because the inflamed segment usually adheres to surrounding structures. Although less common than in ulcerative colitis, toxic dilatation can complicate colonic disease. Fulminant Crohn’s colitis is shown in Figure 16.5; deep ulcers and fibrosis with mucosal oedema and inflammation can be seen.

It is essential to consider malignancy in patients with long-standing Crohn’s disease, with or without symptoms. There is an elevated risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma: 2.5-fold overall and 4.5-fold for colonic disease, with a 10-year cumulative risk following diagnosis of 2.9%. Evidence is limited that surveillance provides protection and many patients with longstanding colonic Crohn’s eventually come to colectomy. Crohn’s disease is also associated with ∼︀30-fold excess risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma, but because that cancer is rare, the absolute risk only amounts to 0.2% at 10 years and 2.2% at 25 years after diagnosis.

25% of patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease and 75% with large bowel disease have troublesome anal lesions, including abscess, fistula, fissures, ulceration, oedematous skin tags, anorectal stricturing. Anal fissures are often multiple and indolent, and extend to involve any part of the perineum, including the vagina or scrotum. Systemic manifestations of Crohn’s disease include anterior uveitis, iritis, polyarthropathy, ankylosing spondylitis, liver disease (e.g. sclerosing cholangitis) and erythema nodosum. Terminal ileal involvement may result in gallstones, with increased incidence following ileocaecal resection.

Investigations

Assessment of nutritional status, including serial weight measurement, is essential. Anaemia may be due to: iron deficiency from chronic blood loss and rarely due to malabsorption; a normocytic anaemia of chronic disease; macrocytic anaemia from vitamin B12 or folate malabsorption. Elevated acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein are useful in monitoring disease, though not specific for diagnostic purposes. Until recently, the diagnosis was most frequently made on barium follow-through: typical features are shown in Figure 16.6 – rose-thorn ulcers, long irregular terminal ileal stricture at the site of previous ileocaecal resection. Active disease produces radiological evidence of thickening, luminal narrowing and separation of loops, and is often associated with mucosal ulceration, deep fissuring ulcers and cobblestone appearance. Skip lesions and fistula formation may be apparent. However, MRI enteroclysis (image enhanced by administering oral osmotically active agent – e.g. PEG) has progressively become the investigation of choice (Fig. 16.7), which also has the advantage of limiting radiation exposure. Rectal examination, proctoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy determine disease extent and biopsy of inflamed bowel is mandatory. Newer investigative techniques include video-capsule endoscopy (Fig. 16.8), enteroscopy, and CT colonography. Double-contrast barium enema still has a place for assessing disease extent and delineation of fistulae.

Management

Surgical management

Many patients with Crohn’s disease undergo surgery at some stage of their disease course and multiple operations are common. There are four main categories of indications for surgical management of Crohn’s disease:

Modern surgical principles are to preserve bowel length whenever possible, by employing a conservative approach to bowel resection and liberal use of stricturoplasty (longitudinal enterotomy with transverse anastomosis of strictured bowel) to enlarge the gut lumen. In all cases, length of small bowel remaining should be measured and documented. Radical surgery is not appropriate because the risk of recurrence is determined by the disease natural history rather than wide surgical clearance. Disease resurgence is common following small bowel resection but is less than 20% in colonic disease. In the initial phases of colonic Crohn’s disease, segmental resection is preferred to bypass of affected segments. However, many such patients eventually undergo proctocolectomy and permanent ileostomy. In perianal Crohn’s disease, loculated pus must be drained and radical surgery should be avoided, as the disease tends to recur. Simple fistulae may be laid open, but long-term drainage Setons are widely used for complex fistulae involving sphincter muscle. Complex reconstructions such as rectal advancement flaps tend to be avoided.

Ulcerative colitis

The annual incidence of ulcerative colitis is ∼︀10/100 000 population in Westernized countries but rare in developing countries. The aetiology is incompletely understood, but genetic, immunological and dietary factors all play a part. The disorder may affect any age group but peak incidence is in early adulthood. In the majority of cases, the disease is contiguous, affecting the rectum and extending proximally (see Table 16.1). In 5% of cases, it is segmental and the rectum is occasionally spared. There is substantial risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma in cases with pancolitis. Although ulcerative colitis is primarily a disease of the large bowel, systemic manifestations (iritis, polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, hepatitis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum) can occur. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) affects 2–5% of cases of ulcerative colitis; it tends to indicate severe disease and predicts complications. Patients with PSC may develop liver failure and require liver transplantation.

Pathology

The characteristic feature of ulcerative colitis is inflammation restricted to the mucosa and submucosa of the large bowel. In severe episodes, there may be full-thickness involvement with inflammatory infiltrate. Abscesses develop at the base of the colonic crypts, which burst and coalesce to form crypt abscesses. These undermine the mucosa, resulting in ulceration (Fig. 16.9) and oedema of the intervening mucosa, which may form inflammatory pseudopolyps. Histologically, as well as ulceration and crypt abscesses, there is chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate, crypt architectural distortion and goblet cell depletion, but granulomas are absent. The colon loses its haustrations and becomes thick and rigid. Stricturing is uncommon and its presence should raise the possibility of Crohn’s disease. There can be difficulty in distinguishing ulcerative colitis from Crohn’s colitis both pathologically and clinically, when the term ‘indeterminate colitis’ is used to denote uncertainty. There may even be migration from one disease entity to the other. There are important implications for surgical treatment, since ileo-anal pouch should be avoided in cases of Crohn’s colitis.

Clinical features

Ulcerative colitis characteristically runs a relapsing/remitting course, although some patients may have a chronic continuous variant. In some cases, the initial attack is fulminant, and toxic dilatation with exacerbation of abdominal and systemic symptoms may occur at any time. Diarrhoea with the passage of mucus and blood is typical of relapse. Abdominal pain and tenderness may be present and intermittent pyrexia is common. Passage of 10–15 or more stools each day is not unusual in acute severe exacerbations. As well as increased faecal frequency, incapacitating faecal urgency is a distressing problem degrading quality of life for many patients.

Careful rectal examination should detect anal complications such as fissure, fistula and haemorrhoids, which are present in 25% of cases. The rectal mucosa often feels thick and boggy. Sigmoidoscopy and biopsy is the key investigation and reveals a red, granular mucosa with contact bleeding. In the early stages of disease, the only sign on sigmoidoscopy may be loss of the rectal mucosal vessels. As the disease progresses, severe ulceration leads to fulminant colitis, the complications of which include dramatic nutritional depletion, toxic dilatation, perforation and severe bleeding. During an exacerbation, the dilated colon may become paper-thin. Recent population-based studies have revealed that the mortality for all inpatient admissions for ulcerative colitis is ∼︀15% at 3 years, and this emphasizes the potential severity of the disorder.

Investigations

Expert colonoscopy is the mainstay of diagnosis and assessment of disease extent/severity. Endoscopic features of severe acute colitis are shown in Figure 16.10. Barium enema is infrequently used in modern inflammatory bowel disease practice and may risk perforation. Typical changes include loss of haustrations, fluffy granularity of the mucosa, and pseudopolyps. Undermining ulcers may create a double contour to the edge of the colon. Widening of the retrorectal space, due to perirectal inflammation and reduced distensibility of the rectum, is common. In longstanding colitis, the bowel may become short and featureless, resembling a smooth tube (lead-pipe colon). In an acute attack, plain films of the abdomen may reveal a dilated gas-filled colon in which pseudopolyps are evident. When toxic dilatation is suspected, daily plain X-rays are essential to monitor progress (Fig. 16.11). ‘Backwash ileitis’ may produce a dilated and featureless terminal ileum in which the mucosa appears granular. In the acute phase, it is essential to collect stool cultures to exclude supervening bacterial infection and especially C. difficile.

Surveillance colonoscopy has an important place in the management of long-standing colitis to detect dysplasia or supervening cancer.

Management

Medical management

Repeated clinical and laboratory assessment is key during an acute exacerbation to identify those with a severe episode that requires escalation of therapy and/or surgical resection. Daily stool charting, temperature and pulse, along with assays of C reactive protein and albumin are essential. Various criteria are used to identify those with a severe episode and these include Truelove and Witt’s score: stool frequency > 6 × /24h AND any of Hb < 105 g/l, ESR > 30 mm/h, pulse > 90 bpm, T > 37.5°C

Fluid and electrolyte replacement, correction of anaemia, nutritional support, intravenous corticosteroid therapy, and timely surgical intervention are the mainstay of treatment of an exacerbation. High-dose systemic steroids (oral prednisolone, intravenous methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone) are needed during an acute relapse. In fulminant colitis, immunosuppression with ciclosporin A or anti-TNF therapy (e.g. infliximab) may be helpful. Topical steroids delivered by enema or suppository usually control mild attacks of proctocolitis. Long-term aminosalicylates, such as mesalazine or olsalazine, have been shown to reduce the risk of relapse when a patient is in remission. Azathioprine is used for maintenance therapy and may induce remission, though it is not used with such intent. Around 15% of all patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis will eventually require surgery. The risk varies from 1 in 50 for those with mild proctitis, to 1 in 20 for moderately severe colitis, and 1 in 2 for those with extensive disease.

Surgical management

Indications for surgery in the emergency and elective setting include fulminant colitis that fails to respond to aggressive medical therapy, perforation and toxic dilatation. Patients presenting as an emergency are catabolic, malnourished, immunosuppressed, bacteraemic and septic. Hence, surgical reconstruction in the acute phase is inadvisable and management comprises colectomy and ileostomy as a ‘first-aid’ operation. The rectum is closed over as a stump in the pelvis, or by bringing out the distal end as a mucous fistula. Completion proctectomy and the formation of an ileo-anal pouch are undertaken ∼︀6 months following the emergency operation to allow general health improvements. It is important that patients understand that it is essential to remove the residual rectum because of the elevated risk of rectal cancer over the remaining lifetime.

Indications for surgery in the elective setting include failure of medical management or repeated relapses on medical treatment. Failure to thrive, as reflected in retardation of growth and sexual development in children, or malnourishment and anaemia in adults, is a common indication for operation. The onset of biopsy-proven dysplasia or carcinoma in chronic disease necessitates surgical intervention.

Modern surgical practice comprises restorative proctocolectomy with retention of the anal sphincters and reconstruction by formation of an ileal pouch anastomosed to the upper anal canal. This approach has the benefits of removing all but a tiny cuff of rectal mucosa in the upper anal canal, and also maintaining the ability to defaecate normally. A temporary ileostomy may be required. Median stool frequency is 4–6 liquid/soft motions/day, but the debilitating faecal urgency associated with colitis is eliminated and the overall quality of life is excellent. Where pouch anal anastomosis is not possible, a Koch’s continent ileostomy may be considered. Proctocolectomy and permanent end ileostomy still has an important place in management.

Cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis

Colorectal cancer risk in long-standing ulcerative colitis is a major factor contributing to surgical decision-making. Carcinoma is typically difficult to detect in colitis, is usually poorly differentiated and has a poor prognosis. Around 2% of all patients will develop cancer at 10 years, 8% at 20 years and 18% at 30 years. In pancolitis, the overall risk is around 25% after 30 years. Early age at first onset (< 15 years), pancolitis, a family history of colorectal cancer and associated PSC are strong cancer risk factors. Cancer surveillance is recommended in the long-term management of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis, and colonoscopy should be performed at 2-yearly intervals (see EBM 16.1). Random biopsies are taken at surveillance colonoscopy, since dysplasia indicates a high risk of cancer. Dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM) is a high-risk indicator of impending, or concurrent, cancer development. Cancer risk for patients with high-grade dysplasia or DALM is > 60% in the next 2 years and so restorative proctocolectomy is recommended. Patients with pancolitis may opt for prophylactic restorative proctocolectomy, especially when ulcerative colitis was diagnosed before the age of 15 years, rather than the uncertainty associated with life-long surveillance.

Disorders of the small intestine

Small bowel neoplasms

Small bowel tumours account for less than 5% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Malignant tumours

Malignant small intestinal tumours are rare and frequently diagnosed late because symptoms are non-specific and so initial presentation may be at laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. In symptomatic cases, imaging modalities include MRI enteroclysis, barium follow-through, CT scan, flexible enteroscopy and video-capsule endoscopy.

Peutz–Jeghers syndrome

Peutz–Jeghers syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder with high penetrance. The disease is caused by mutations in the LKB1 gene, located on the short arm of chromosome 19. Some cases are due to as yet unmapped genes. The clinical manifestations include gastrointestinal polyps and melanin pigmentation at mucocutaneous junctions, characteristically around the mouth and eyes. Occasionally there is pigmentation on the dorsum of the hands and feet. Affected individuals are at risk of colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, breast, and ovarian cancers. Small intestinal and gastric cancers occur in around 7% of patients and colorectal cancer in 10–20%.

Jejunal diverticulosis

Jejunal diverticulae are acquired during adult life. Occasionally, only one or two diverticula are present but often diverticulosis is very extensive, with multiple wide-mouthed sacs caused by herniation of mucosa into the mesentery at the site of vessel penetration of the gut wall. Jejunal diverticulosis may be first diagnosed at laparotomy for complicated disease, or incidentally on imaging studies (Fig. 16.14). Diverticulae may cause bleeding, inflammation, malabsorption (due to bacterial over-colonization) and perforation. Occasionally, fish bones or NSAID tablets can become trapped in a diverticulum and cause local perforation. In symptomatic disease the extensive nature of the disorder often necessitates a conservative approach with antibiotics and intravenous fluids. However, a bowel segment with complicated diverticulosis may require limited resection, leaving other affected areas in situ.

Small bowel ischaemia

Small intestinal ischaemia is usually due to atheromatous occlusion with superadded thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery. Factors predisposing to mesenteric thrombosis include thrombophilia, hyperviscosity syndromes, dehydration, hypovolaemia or hypoperfusion of the gut resulting from trauma, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrhythmia and septic shock. Arterial embolism can result from atrial fibrillation or recent myocardial infarction. In a third of patients dying from acute ischaemic necrosis of the midgut, there is no demonstrable occlusion of a major vessel, and in these cases low perfusion is responsible. Other causes include polycythaemia, sickle cell disease and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Arteritis should be suspected where there are other stigmata or a history of disseminated arteritis, such as pre-existing renal failure. Impaired venous return from the gut can be due to hyperviscosity syndromes and prothrombotic tendency, but are also seen in the presence of malignancy and portal hypertension.

Ischaemic necrosis may progress to necrosis of all bowel layers with gangrene and perforation. Acute occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is predominantly a disease of the elderly and leads to complete midgut necrosis.

Small and large bowel obstruction

Obstruction refers to a mechanical impedance to the normal propulsive action through the intestine. While the underlying mode of clinical presentation and underlying aetiology may differ between small and large intestine, a number of underlying principles can be considered together. The most common causes of small intestinal obstruction are adhesions (60%), obstructed hernia (20%) and malignancy (primary and secondary – 5–8%). In the large bowel, colorectal adenocarcinoma predominates (> 70%), followed by stricturing diverticular disease (10%) and sigmoid volvulus (5%). The aetiology of large and small bowel obstruction can be systematically classified as intraluminal, intramural and extramural (Table 16.2). Treatment should be focused on the underlying cause of obstruction and operation is frequently required.

Table 16.2 Causes of small and large bowel obstruction

  Small intestine Large intestine
Intramural (intrinsic) Crohn’s disease
Radiation stricture
Tuberculosis
Ischaemic stricture
(caecal carcinoma)
Primary tumour – lymphoma, adenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumour
Intussusception secondary to: hypertrophy of Peyer’s patches, Peutz–Jeghers polyp
Colorectal adenocarcinoma
Diverticular stricture
Sigmoid volvulus
Radiation stricture (rectum/sigmoid)
Ischaemic stricture
Caecal volvulus
Crohn’s disease
Extrinsic Postoperative adhesions
Adhesions from previous inflammatory condition
Congenital band
Hernia
Compression by tumour mass
Volvulus
Rare due to lumen diameter and retroperitoneal location
Compression by tumour mass
Massive inguinal hernia
Incisional hernia
Intra-luminal Foreign body
Gallstone ileus
Worm infestation
Bezoar
Faecal concretion (very rare)

The clinical presentation of bowel obstruction reflects the anatomical location of the lesion. The predominating features from proximal to distal are as follows.

Proximal jejunal obstruction – very short history of anorexia, vomiting, relatively severe upper abdominal pain and absent/minimal abdominal distension with limited, if any, change in bowel habit.

Distal small bowel obstruction – short history of colicky midgut (peri-umbilical pain, distension, vomiting and recent absolute constipation).

Colonic obstruction presents more insidiously with poorly defined hindgut abdominal pain/discomfort, weight loss, pronounced abdominal distension, history of altered bowel habit tending to constipation with little or no vomiting.

Initially the bowel proximal to obstruction contracts vigorously in an attempt to overcome the mechanical impedance. However, eventually peristalsis subsides and paralytic ileus ensues due to electrolyte imbalance and gross distension proximal to the obstruction. Patients with obstruction frequently present with profound dehydration due to a combination of vomiting, enforced fasting and ‘third space’ losses into the wall of the thickened intestine and peritoneal transudate. If the situation continues without decompression and resolution, there is progressive bacterial translocation into the portal circulation and the patient becomes increasingly toxic. Eventually bowel viability becomes compromised and may perforate. Features that indicate imminent perforation, strangulation or established peritonitis from perforation are: pyrexia, tachycardia, dehydration, hypotension, leucocytosis, peritonism on abdominal palpation and completely absent bowel sounds.

Full clinical history and examination is essential, along with immediate instigation of intravenous fluid and electrolyte therapy. Digital rectal examination may reveal rectal or extrinsic malignancy, empty rectum or constipation. Hernial orifices must be carefully inspected and any previous surgical abdominal scars noted. Abdominal X-ray will reveal distended small bowel or large bowel loops (Fig. 16.15) and may give an indication of the level of obstruction. Free gas under the diaphragm indicates perforation and mandates laparotomy and grossly distended bowel loops or evidence of a closed loop obstruction also merit early surgical intervention. Increasingly CT scan is used to assess bowel obstruction, because it allows interpretation of the likely need for surgery, as well as identifying the underlying aetiology (Fig. 16.16). Right iliac fossa tenderness along with radiological evidence of gross caecal distension in the presence of distal colonic obstruction is a critical sign as it indicates imminent caecal perforation, which is a frequent complication of distal colonic obstruction. The reason that the caecum perforates even with obstruction due to sigmoid cancer is because the caecum is anatomically the largest diameter segment in the gut. Thus tension is greatest in the caecal wall, despite equalized intra-luminal pressure along the colon (practical relevance of the Law of Laplace).

Closed loop obstruction in either small or large bowel is more likely to strangulate and perforate. Closed loop obstruction can occur in small bowel due to adhesions or malignant involvement of two parts of the small bowel. If the ileocaecal valve remains competent in colonic obstruction, this acts as one end of a closed loop and the risk of perforation is high, typically at the caecum as described above.

Pseudo-obstruction and nonmechanical gut functional disorder

Pseudo-obstruction

The causes of pseudo-obstruction are shown in Table 16.3. The underlying mechanism is not fully understood but the pathogenesis involves autonomic imbalance resulting from decreased parasympathetic tone or excessive sympathetic output. It is essential to consider pseudo-obstruction in patients who present with signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction.

Table 16.3 Causes of non-mechanical bowel dysfunction/pseudo-obstruction

Systemic/metabolic

Drugs

Miscellaneous

The majority of cases of pseudo-obstruction are due to large bowel dysfunction, although small bowel may be affected. It usually arises in the elderly and frail. Around 15% of all patients who present with signs and symptoms of large bowel obstruction in fact have pseudo-obstruction. Operative mortality in patients with pseudo-obstruction is > 15% and so surgery should be avoided wherever possible. Blood electrolyte estimation is essential, along with further imaging to ensure that mechanical obstruction is not present. For cases with large bowel distension, contrast radiography is essential using rectal contrast with fluoroscopy or in combination with computed tomography scanning to avoid unnecessary operation.

Management is conservative and involves stimulant enemas. Colonoscopic deflation may be required in cases where caecal distension causes concern about impending caecal perforation. Intravenous erythromycin can be effective in non-resolving cases and has been shown to stimulate motility by binding to colonic motilin receptors. Intravenous neostigmine has been shown to be effective when other measures fail to resolve the pseudo-obstruction. Progression of disease can lead to colonic perforation and so, in a small minority of cases, colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, or with ileostomy, may be required.

Non-neoplastic disorders of the large intestine

Colonic diverticular disease

Colonic diverticulosis is extremely common in developed countries, being apparent to some extent in more than 60% of people over the age of 70 years. The true population prevalence is unknown because estimates are based on indirect information from people who have undergone GI investigation for some reason. In most cases it is asymptomatic, often being noted incidentally on investigation for symptoms that are not due to the disease itself. Diverticulosis is the preferred term for such cases. Symptomatic diverticular disease can be classified as uncomplicated or complicated as discussed below. Diverticulosis is an acquired condition linked with a low-fibre diet, being rare in populations whose staple diet is high in fibre.

Although the whole colon can be affected, the sigmoid colon is most commonly involved, related to the high intraluminal pressure at this site caused by a low-residue diet. Muscular hypertrophy can be detected radiologically before diverticulae develop. Pulsion diverticulae emerge between the mesenteric and antimesenteric taeniae and result from herniation of mucosa through the circular muscle at the sites of penetration of feeding arteries. The true rectum is not affected because of differences in the arrangement of the blood supply and also because the outer longitudinal smooth muscle tube encompasses the full circumference of the rectum, contrasting with the colonic taeniae.

In addition to the common acquired diverticular change that may affect the caecum, there is a rare congenital solitary diverticulum of the caecum that can arise from the medial wall close to the ileocaecal valve and can extend upwards retroperitoneally. This may become obstructed by a faecolith and inflamed, producing a clinical picture indistinguishable from appendicitis.

Colonic diverticulae may give rise to intermittent lower abdominal/left iliac fossa pain, altered bowel habit, urgency of defaecation and episodic rectal bleeding. The sigmoid colon may be tender on examination. Barium enema reveals muscle thickening and multiple diverticula (Fig. 16.17). Abdominal CT, either as CT colonography or plain abdominal CT, is used increasingly and provides an assessment of the degree of surrounding inflammation and/or abscess formation, in addition to extent of the diverticular changes (Fig. 16.18). Colonoscopy reveals the ostia of diverticulae and may show surrounding inflammation.

In the management of uncomplicated diverticular change, patients should be advised to take a high-fibre diet, supplemented by bran or a bulk laxative such as methylcellulose. Stimulant laxatives and purgatives are to be avoided. Antispasmodics, such as propantheline or mebeverine, may be useful if there is smooth muscle spasm and colicky pain. There is evidence that NSAIDs increase the risk of complications and advice should be given to avoid these agents wherever possible. Surgical resection of the affected segment may be indicated if there are persistent symptoms, or when carcinoma cannot be excluded by radiology or colonoscopy (EBM 16.2).

Complicated diverticular disease

Although most diverticular disease is asymptomatic, serious complications are a frequent cause for emergency admission to surgical wards and are life-threatening and debilitating. Complications of diverticular disease are causally linked to inflammation (Table 16.4). Faeces inspissated in a diverticulum produce stasis and a local inflammatory response. Infection spreads locally and results in peridiverticulitis, producing a low-grade pyrexia and left iliac fossa pain. Persistent infection may cause necrosis and the formation of a peridiverticular abscess. Septic complications are classified by Hinchey grade (Table 16.5). Patients presenting with established diverticular abscess are toxic. Free perforation of the peridiverticular abscess may result. Diverticulitis is also the underlying cause of diverticular bleeding as the feeding arteries are at the apex of each appendix.

Table 16.4 Complications of colonic diverticulae

Inflammation

Obstruction

Bleeding

Fistula formation

Table 16.5 Hinchey classification of septic complications of diverticular disease

Hinchey grade I Localised para-colonic abscess
Hinchey grade II Distant abscess (e.g. pelvic, sub-phrenic)
Hinchey grade III Purulent peritonitis
Hinchey grade IV Faecal peritonitis

Diverticulitis

Peridiverticulitis presents with pyrexia, leucocytosis, nausea and vomiting, and there is often a history of altered bowel habit. Pain and tenderness in the left iliac fossa are almost universal and a mass may be palpable. The initial diagnosis is primarily a clinical one, with the typical presentation being sufficient to treat the patient expectantly. In current practice the diagnosis is usually secured by CT scanning with or without gentle rectal contrast. Colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy and biopsy of inflamed segments are not usually necessary in the acute phase of illness and best left until the acute inflammation settles. Barium enema may reveal diverticular disease, but is best avoided for 4–6 weeks, to allow the inflammatory response to settle.

Treatment comprises fasting or clear fluids by mouth, bed rest, intravenous fluids and broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as a cephalosporin or gentamicin, along with metronidazole. Failure to settle suggests the development of pericolic abscess, and surgical resection and peritoneal toilet combined with abscess drainage may be required. In the absence of rapid improvement within 36–48 hours, intravenous and oral contrast-enhanced CT should be undertaken. CT scan with rectal contrast will reveal communication with the abscess cavity or free perforation. The presence of an abscess indicates the need for surgical resection. Such patients have a very high chance of ongoing sepsis and future surgery is almost certain due to chronic symptoms, even if the acute bout settles with antibiotics. Approximately one-third of all patients admitted with complicated acute diverticular disease require surgery during the index admission, while the remainder settle. Around 10% of these patients will eventually require surgical resection, preferably with primary colocolic anastomosis.

Large intestinal ischaemia

The aetiology of ischaemia of the large bowel is similar to that of the small intestine. Atheroma at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery results in relative insufficiency of the arterial supply from the marginal artery (see Fig. 16.2). In rare cases where the inferior mesenteric artery is patent and an abdominal aortic aneurysm is present, colonic infarction may complicate aortic surgery if the inferior mesenteric artery is ligated. Untreated colonic ischaemia often progresses to gangrene and perforation. Some cases present with an acute bloody diarrhoeal illness known as ischaemic colitis, but others may declare symptoms from a chronic stricture.

Volvulus

Volvulus of the colon most commonly affects the sigmoid colon, and rarely the caecum, and is an important differential diagnosis of any cause of large bowel obstruction, such as cancer and diverticular disease. Sigmoid volvulus is due to a twist around a narrow origin in the sigmoid mesentery. It is an acquired condition and is the most common cause of large bowel obstruction in countries with a high level of dietary fibre and those affected are frequently young adults. By contrast in the UK, patients are usually elderly and chronic constipation is associated. The clinical presentation is of a bowel obstruction with lower abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting and absolute constipation. Occasionally, the patient may present with sepsis owing to an established visceral perforation. Plain radiography reveals a characteristic Y-shaped shadow surrounded by a grossly distended colon arising out of the pelvis on a plain radiograph (‘coffee bean’ sign) (Fig. 16.22). Water-soluble contrast radiography or CT may show the characteristic ‘beaking’ at the site of the twist.

Sigmoid volvulus can be treated conservatively in the emergency situation by reduction and deflation, using rigid or flexible sigmoidoscopy and the placement of a large-bore tube into the sigmoid. Elective sigmoid colectomy following full bowel preparation is curative in the fit patient. In frail and demented patients or those with significant cardiac or other comorbidity, a conservative approach may be taken, but a relapse of the twist is very likely and frequent readmission is the rule. Hence, surgery is the preferred option wherever possible (Fig. 16.23).

Caecal volvulus is a misnomer because it involves both the caecum and the small intestine, with the twist occurring around the superior mesenteric artery. The presence of a congenital intraperitoneal caecum predisposes to volvulus. It is usually suggested by plain radiography showing anticlockwise rotation of dilated small bowel loops around a grossly distended caecum. Caecal volvulus usually requires emergency laparotomy because of the danger of compromise to the arterial supply of substantial lengths of the small bowel.

Hirschsprung’s disease

Hirschsprung’s disease affects 1 in 5000 live births and is due to the absence of ganglion cells in Auerbach’s and Meissner’s plexuses. It is an inherited disorder showing incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. In some cases, there is a strong familial component, and mutations of the RET oncogene on chromosome 10 are responsible for most of these. RET gene mutations are also associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type II. In most cases, 5–20 cm of the distal large bowel is affected. The disease usually presents in childhood, but late presentation in adult life is not unknown. Loss of peristalsis in the affected segment leads to large bowel obstruction with gross distension of the colon proximal to the aganglionic segment. The differential diagnosis in the neonate includes imperforate anus and meconium ileus, and in older children, megacolon acquired as a result of chronic constipation. Ischaemic colitis and, in children, necrotizing enterocolitis have been reported due to superinfection with Staphylococcus aureus.

MRI is replacing barium enema, but either will reveal dilated bowel above the narrowed aganglionic segment. Lack of ganglia is confirmed by full-thickness biopsy of the abnormal area. In neonates, treatment consists of irrigation of the bowel with saline, followed by operation at about 6 weeks to bring ganglionated bowel down to the anal verge. In older children, a preliminary colostomy may be needed to allow bowel decompression. In the rare instance where the disease is not diagnosed until adulthood, the proximal colon is usually dysfunctional due to chronic megacolon and proctocolectomy, and ileo-anal pouch reconstruction may be preferable to anterior resection.

Intestinal stoma and fistula

Stoma

Intestinal stomas have an important place in the management of small and large intestinal disease. An ileostomy is formed by bringing out the ileum through the abdominal wall, usually through the rectus muscle in the right iliac fossa. Ileal bowel content is irritant to skin and a spout is fashioned to allow appliances to be fitted and so prevent skin contact with bowel content (Fig. 16.24). Ileostomy comprises either an ‘end’ stoma, or a ‘loop’ or ‘defunctioning’ stoma. It may be employed as an adjunct to resectional surgery when the disease process prevents re-anastomosis, or as a temporary stoma to allow a distal anastomosis to heal, such as for a low colorectal or ileoanal anastomosis. End-ileostomy is used when the colon has been removed, and occasionally when small intestine distal to the stoma has been removed, as in extensive Crohn’s disease.

The colon can be brought out as an end or a loop colostomy, usually through the rectus muscle in the left iliac fossa. Transverse colostomy is seldom used in modern surgical practice but is brought out onto the right upper quadrant. A colostomy does not require a spout, as faeces are not usually irritant to the skin. End-colostomy is used as part of a Hartmann’s procedure and is an integral part of an abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (see below). A loop colostomy of the sigmoid colon is used to divert faeces from a diseased anorectum, such as during the management of complex perianal fistula or faecal incontinence surgery. It may also be used as palliation for pelvic cancer or during radical radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Polyps and polyposis syndromes of the large intestine

The terms ‘polyp’ and ‘tumour’ are not synonymous. A polyp is a descriptive term referring to an excrescence of the mucosa and is not a pathological definition. The histological classification of colorectal polyps into four groups is shown in Table 16.6. Polyps may be identified by rigid sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (increasingly) or barium enema (now used increasingly less). Colonoscopy affords the opportunity for polypectomy and so enables histological assessment.

Table 16.6 Classification of benign intestinal polyps

Type Solitary Multiple
Neoplastic
Hamartomatous
Adenoma (tubular, tubulovillous, villous)
Juvenile polyp
Peutz–Jeghers polyp
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS)
Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS)
Cronkhite–Canada syndrome
Cowden’s disease
Inflammatory Benign lymphoid polyp Benign lymphoid polyposis
Pseudopolyposis in ulcerative colitis
Metaplastic Metaplastic (hyperplastic)Serrated adenoma MYH-associated polyposis (MAP)
Multiple metaplastic polyps

Colorectal adenoma

Neoplastic epithelial polyps are classified as tubular, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, depending on their histological architecture, and such classification has clinical relevance with respect to cancer risk. Adenomas affect 40% of people over 50 years of age and 70% of those aged 65–69 years. Tubular adenomas account for 75% of all adenomas and are frequently pedunculated but may be sessile. Villous adenomas account for 10% and tubulovillous types for 15% of all adenomas. However, villous adenomas account for 60% of lesions larger than 2 cm. Villous tumours are most commonly located in the rectum and may be very large, carpeting the rectum. Around 50% of such tumours have a focus of carcinoma at presentation. Villous adenomas greater than 1 cm in diameter have an approximately 30% chance of malignancy, whereas the risk in a similar-sized tubular adenoma is around 10%. Multiple adenomas are common, with 24% of patients having at least two tumours.

Management

Colonoscopic polypectomy using an electrocautery snare prevents future risk of malignant conversion as well as enabling histological assessment. Small adenomas can be biopsied and a current applied to destroy the entire polyp (‘hot’ biopsy). In many cases, polypectomy is the only treatment required, even when there is a malignant focus, so long as there are none of the following features: poor differentiation, stalk invasion at the resection margin or invasion of submucosal lymphatics or microvasculature (Fig. 16.26). Surgical resection (Fig. 16.27) is indicated following polypectomy if these histological features are noted, since there is a greatly increased risk of bowel wall invasion or lymphatic spread. Polypectomy may be technically impossible or the risk of perforation too high (caecal lesions) and so bowel resection may be indicated for larger polyps. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows resection of large rectal villous adenomas and repair of the rectal defect using an operating microscope. Advanced colonoscopic techniques such as lasering or submucosal resection are now well established for larger lesions when surgery is to be avoided.

Follow-up colonoscopy is recommended after 6–12 months and 2–3 years. The current view is not in favour of long-term follow-up once the colon has been shown to be clear of any further polyps, unless the polyps fulfilled high-risk criteria or there were recurrent lesions at the 3-year screen.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)

FAP is one of the most common single-gene disorders predisposing to cancer and is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. The gene responsible is APC, which is located on the long arm of chromosome 5. In addition to germline changes resulting in FAP, almost every sporadic colorectal cancer has a somatic defect in the APC gene or in other components of the W nt signalling pathway. The annual incidence of FAP is 1 in 6670 live births and the population prevalence is 1 in 13 528. Around 25% of affected individuals have no family history of FAP, the disease arising in these sporadic cases as the result of a new germline mutation. Direct testing for the APC gene is now routine. Clinicopathological diagnosis requires the presence of > 100 adenomatous polyps of the large bowel (Fig. 16.28). Adenomatous polyps usually develop during teenage years and early adulthood, with > 90% chance of colorectal cancer by the third or fourth decade if prophylactic colectomy is not undertaken. Because of effective surgical prophylaxis, FAP now accounts for less than 0.2% of all cases of colorectal cancer in the UK. The prevalence of colorectal cancer at diagnosis is 65% for symptomatic ‘sporadic’ cases and < 5% for screened family members, emphasizing the effectiveness of prophylaxis and surveillance.

Extra-colonic features

Polyps are detected in 70% of FAP patients in the gastric fundus, but these are cystic gland polyps rather than adenomas. Gastric antral and duodenal adenomas are apparent in over 90% of cases and malignant degeneration of peri-ampullary adenoma is now the major cause of death – 7% of patients eventually develop peri-ampullary cancer. Ileal adenomas also occur in FAP, but the risk of progression to malignancy appears to be very low. Craniofacial and long bone osteomas occur in the majority of FAP patients, and when these are a predominant feature, especially when associated with epidermoid cysts, the term Gardner’s syndrome is widely used. However, Gardner’s syndrome is simply a subgroup of FAP.

Intra-abdominal desmoid tumours arise in around 10% of FAP cases. Although benign, these lesions expand and compress adjacent structures. Treatment with toremifene, tamoxifen, sulindac, indomethacin, chemotherapy and radiotherapy may provide benefit in non-resectable cases with problematical symptoms or complications.

An epidermoid cyst arising in a prepubescent child should raise suspicion of FAP. Bilateral asymptomatic pigmented retinal lesions, known as congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) are a feature of FAP. There is an increased risk of papillary thyroid carcinoma in women (160-fold excess risk < 35 years), but no increased risk in men. Other rare associations with FAP include hepatoblastoma, carcinoma of the gallbladder, bile duct and pancreas, and an increased risk of brain tumours.

Metaplastic (hyperplastic) polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP)

Metaplastic (now more properly termed as hyperplastic) polyps are usually less than 5 mm in diameter and occur in increasing numbers with age, being present in some 75% of the population over the age of 40 years. Polyps tend to be pale, flat-topped, sessile plaques, found mainly in the rectum and often on the crest of mucosal folds. Histologically, the crypts are elongated, dilated and lined by columnar epithelium that has a sawtooth pattern. These polyps are often indistinguishable from adenomatous polyps, and are frequently removed because of the difficulties in differentiating them from adenomas. Some of the larger metaplastic polyps take on the features of a serrated adenoma and principally affect the caecum, where they are highly likely to progress to cancer.

A subset of individuals with multiple hyperplastic polyps early in life has a substantially elevated cancer. A gene involved in DNA base excision repair (MUTYH) has been shown to be responsible for colorectal hyperplastic polyposis in association with adenomatous polyps. The syndrome should be considered as a differential diagnosis of FAP, but with smaller numbers of adenomas. Mode of inheritance is autosomal recessive (cf. FAP which is autosomal dominant) and colorectal cancer risk is very high. The management of documented homozygous MUTYH mutation carriers is controversial. Some advocate colonoscopic surveillance in the same manner as FAP and JPS but others cite the penetrance for colorectal cancer > 90% and recommend prophylactic colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.

Malignant tumours of the large intestine

Colorectal adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the large bowel is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy. It is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in developed countries. There are ∼︀36 000 new cases in the UK annually, accounting for around 15% and 12% of all cancer registration in males and females respectively. Lifetime risk is ∼︀5%. It is third-ranked cancer overall after lung and prostate in males, and breast and lung in females. The male:female ratio for colon cancer is close to unity, whereas that for rectal cancer is 1.7:1. Incidence rates increase substantially with age. The rectum and sigmoid are particularly common sites for tumours (Fig. 16.29). However, in low-incidence countries, tumours are more evenly distributed. Around 3% of patients present with synchronous tumours, and another 3% develop a metachronous tumour.

Aetiology

The aetiology is multifactorial, but there is a substantial environmental aetiological contribution, as evidenced by comparison of incidence between populations and by migration studies that demonstrate how a migrant population takes on the risk of the host population within a generation. These include male gender (males’ lifetime risk 1.5 times that of females), increasing age, a strong family history of the disease and consuming a ‘Westernized’ diet.

Protective agents

Aspirin has been shown conclusively in case-control and cohort epidemiological studies and also recently in randomized trials to substantially reduce colorectal adenoma and cancer risk (variously 30–50% risk reduction). Other NSAIDs also appear to be protective. Dietary calcium supplements and vitamin D also are associated with a reduced risk. Hormone replacement therapy also seems to be protective (EBM 16.4).

Genetic susceptibility

Genetic susceptibility contributes 35% to the overall incidence of colorectal cancer. This genetic component ranges from an ill-defined increased risk in individuals with a positive family history, to well-defined autosomal dominant genetic traits in which the responsible genes have been identified and mutations characterized. Three broad categories of genetic susceptibility trait have been defined at the clinical and/or molecular level: autosomal dominant heritable colorectal cancer susceptibility syndromes (HNPCC, FAP, PJS, JPS); recessive inheritance (MUTYH associated polyposis); common genetic inheritance.

Autosomal polyposis syndromes and MAP are described above. HNPCC (also known as Lynch syndrome) is the most common autosomal dominant cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of all colorectal cancer cases. It is associated with only small numbers of adenomas, but the risk of colorectal cancer is very high, with 70% of males and 35% of females developing the disease over a lifetime. There is also an elevated risk of other malignancies, including endometrial, gastric ovarian, upper urinary tract and small intestinal.

HNPCC is of major interest because it is a relatively common definable genetic cause of colorectal cancer and thus lends itself to identification of gene carriers by DNA analysis of blood samples. Mutation analysis allows targeting of those at risk for colonoscopic screening and adenoma removal, and this has been shown to be an effective cancer control measure in HNPCC.

HNPCC is due to mutation of one of the genes that participate in DNA mismatch repair. Mutations are most common in MSH2 on chromosome 2p, MLH1 on chromosome 2q and MSH6 on chromosome 2p. Around 90% of large dominant HNPCC families from research studies have identifiable mutations. In clinical genetics practice, however, only 30% of selected families have mutations in one of the genes responsible. Overall, causative mutations have been identified in ∼︀3% of all colorectal cancer cases, but patients who develop colorectal cancer at an early age are more likely to have developed the disease because of an underlying DNA mismatch repair gene defect; 1 in 4 of patients aged < 40 years and 1 in 20 aged < 55 years at diagnosis of colorectal cancer carry a mutation, irrespective of family history.

Common genetic variance has been shown to contribute to colorectal cancer through genome-wide analysis. So far 14 common variants have been identified with allele frequencies in the general population in the range 10–50%. Many of the variants are in genes encoding proteins participating in cellular growth signaling pathways such as SMAD and TGF signaling pathways. However, the colorectal cancer risk associated with these variants is low (typically RR 1.05–1.2) and so they currently cannot be used for individual risk prediction.

Clinical features of established colorectal cancer

Intestinal symptoms are extremely common in the general population but there are no specific symptoms that discriminate cancer from benign intestinal diseases or from symptoms common in healthy individuals. Presentation may include intermittent rectal bleeding, blood mixed with mucus, altered bowel habit, iron deficiency anaemia and colicky lower abdominal pain. Tenesmus occurs in over 50% of patients with low rectal cancers. Massive lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage is rare and so is more likely to represent underlying benign disorders rather than colorectal cancer. Abdominal wall invasion may manifest as parietal pain and occasionally leads to abscess formation. Perianal or sciatic-type pain is an ominous sign suggesting locally advanced rectal cancer. Around 3% of presenting patients are under the age of 35, but sinister symptoms are often ignored by young patients. Around 15% of all patients present with obstruction and 3% have a perforation at presentation, complications which are associated with poorer stage-specific prognosis.

A full history is essential, as clinical examination is often negative. There may be signs of anaemia, and abdominal examination may reveal hepatomegaly or an abdominal mass, especially in right-sided colon cancer. There may be signs of bowel obstruction. Digital rectal examination is mandatory to detect low cancers and to assess fixity and sphincter involvement. Faecal occult blood (FOB) testing will not alter the decision to investigate the symptomatic patient and so is a superfluous investigation.

Investigations

Colonoscopy is the investigation of choice (Fig. 16.30). However, increasingly CT colonography (Fig. 16.31) is employed in the investigation of altered bowel habit. It has similar diagnostic accuracy to colonoscopy, although clearly lacks the advantage of enabling diagnostic biopsy or snaring of adenomas. Barium enema (Fig. 16.32) still has a place but is becoming a somewhat obsolete test. Typical features of colorectal cancer are shouldering and mucosal destruction, but biopsy is essential wherever possible. In some instances the diagnosis is only made at laparotomy for a perforated or obstructed viscus.

Preoperative staging

Staging is a central component of preoperative work-up, as it provides important information on prognosis, helps inform surgical strategy and indicates the need or otherwise for adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer and adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. All patients with colon or rectal cancer should undergo CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis (Fig. 16.33). Liver ultrasound and chest X-ray have now been almost totally superseded by CT. For rectal cancer, digital examination and rigid sigmoidoscopy should be undertaken in every case (examination under anaesthetic – EUA – may be required) to assess the degree of tumour fixity. Pelvic MRI is essential to assess the degree of local invasion of rectal cancer. Endoanal ultrasound may also be useful for local staging of rectal cancer, but is somewhat operator-dependent and requires considerable experience and interpretational skill. In some cases being considered for major debilitating surgery with a view to cure, FDG positron emission tomography in combination with CT scanning (FDG-PET-CT) is indicated. PET-CT has the potential to detect unsuspected distant metastatic disease that can influence the decision to undertake major resectional surgery, rather than more limited procedures.

Management of colorectal adenocarcinoma

Surgery

Elective colorectal resection with curative intent

The mainstay of treatment comprises en bloc resection of the primary tumour and loco-regional nodes. This achieves cure in 75% of cases undergoing intended ‘curative’ resections. Excision of the colonic mesentery, ligation of the arterial supply at its origin, and excision of all accompanying lymph nodes achieve locoregional lymphadenectomy for the respective segment of bowel (Fig. 16.34). Resection offers cure for patients with localized disease; even for patients with lymph node metastases but no distant metastases, cure can be expected in 50% of cases with surgery alone. For rectal cancer, excision of the entire mesorectum can reduce local recurrence rates to < 5%. Wherever possible, bowel continuity should be restored. In specialist hands, low rectal cancer should be treated by low anterior resection and colo-anal anastomosis. A colonic J-pouch may be formed in an attempt to improve defaecatory function. However, for low rectal cancer involving the sphincter muscle, it may be necessary to remove the anal sphincter as part of an abdominoperineal resection and fashion a permanent end-colostomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resection is increasingly used and has been shown to provide short-term benefits, with less pain and shorter hospital stay. However, there is no definitive evidence of improved long-term outcomes over open surgery.

Rectal cancer can be excised per-anally under direct vision or using trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). TEM is particularly applicable to small low-lying cancers (< 3 cm). Per-anal excision has a place for T1 or T2 tumours and may allow avoidance of major abdominal surgery. However, careful staging is essential because the recurrence rate is 25–30% if there are incomplete excision margins or if the lesion was staged inaccurately. Pathology assessment may indicate the need to proceed to formal resection and mesorectal excision.

Early polyp cancers removed at colonoscopic snare polypectomy may be treated without the need for formal trans-abdominal resection. However, where the pathology specimen of the snared polyp cancer shows poor differentiation or submucosal lymphatic or vascular invasion, or where the diathermized margin is involved, formal resection and regional lymphadenectomy are indicated. With the introduction of population colorectal cancer screening by FOBT, this is becoming a more common scenario.

In the elective setting, the patient should be fasted and have undergone full preoperative work-up to assess cardiac, respiratory and any other co-morbidity; reversible risk factors for major surgery should have been addressed. Bowel preparation has been radically reshaped in recent years. Fluid diet is instigated for 48 hours prior to surgery but mechanical bowel preparation is now avoided for the majority of resections and only a phosphate enema 2 hours prior to surgery is required for left sided resections. Recent meta-analyses indicate that there is no benefit for mechanical bowel preparation (comprising polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate or phospho-soda), and it may even be harmful. However bowel preparation does have a place for low rectal anastomoses, especially if a defunctioning ileostomy is planned. Antibiotic prophylaxis comprises perioperative broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g. a third-generation cephalosporin, or gentamicin and ampicillin, and metronidazole). Chemical thrombo-prophylaxis (low molecular weight fractionated heparin or calcium heparin), along with compression stockings and intraoperative intermittent pneumatic calf compression (EBM 16.5) is indicated as the risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is high in such cases.

16.5 Preparation for surgery in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma

‘Preoperative staging is required to guide surgery and pre-operative adjuvant radiotherapy.

Bowel preparation is not required for colorectal resection.

Compression stockings and heparin are required thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Patient should be fasted prior to surgery.

Co-morbidity should be addressed wherever possible to limit perioperative mortality risk.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is essential and should cover coliform and anaerobic organisms.’

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the Management of Colorectal Cancer 3rd edition (2007). http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/assets/documents/COLO_guides.pdf

Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD001544. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4.

Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign122.pdf

Wille-Jørgensen P, Rasmussen MS, Andersen BR, Borly L. Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001217. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001217.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign104.pdf

Nelson RL, Glenny AM, Song F. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001181. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub3.

Pathology and staging

Macroscopically, colorectal cancer may be polypoidal, ulcerating or stenosing (Fig. 16.35). Two-thirds are ulcerating and a typical lesion has raised everted edges, a slough-covered floor and indurated base. Tumours of the caecum tend to be large exophytic growths. Tumour differentiation may be classified as good, moderate or poor. Around 10–20% of tumours have mucinous histology and this tumour type has a poor prognosis. There is an increasing proportion of proximal tumours in the UK, as right colonic cancer is more common in the elderly and the UK population is ageing.

Colorectal cancer may spread by lymphatic invasion, via the portal blood to the liver and/or by trans-peritoneal seeding. Once the peritoneum is breached, dissemination throughout the abdominal cavity is likely. Invasion of lymphatics results in regional lymph node involvement. Very low rectal tumours may also involve the inguinal nodes. Systemic metastases may occur in the later stages of the disease. Tumour staging systems include Dukes’ and TNM staging (Tables 16.7 and 16.8). TNM stages can be grouped using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system (Table 16.9). Pathological staging has important implications for prognosis and also for directing clinical management (EBM 16.6). Staging information informs both predicted survival outcome and also decision-making on whether adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated.

Table 16.7 Dukes’ staging for colorectal cancer

Dukes’ stage Description Proportion of colorectal cancers (%)
A Spread into, but not beyond, muscularis propria 10
B Spread through full thickness of bowel wall 30
C Spread to involve lymph nodes 30
D* Distant metastases 20

* There is formally no D stage in Dukes’ staging; this is a misnomer, as Dukes’ staging refers only to degree of local invasion and to lymphatic spread. However, the term is widely used in clinical practice.

Table 16.8 TNM staging of colorectal cancer

T (Tumour)

Primary tumour cannot be assessed

Carcinoma in situ

Cancer invades submucosa Cancer invades into muscularis propria Cancer invades through muscularis propria and into subserosa or adjacent non-peritonealized tissues Cancer perforates the visceral peritoneum or directly invades adjacent organs N (Node) The regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed No regional lymph nodes involved Metastases in 1–3 pericolic or perirectal lymph nodes Metastases in 4 or more pericolic or perirectal lymph nodes Metastases in lymph node along the course of a major named blood vessel M (Metastases) The presence of distant metastases cannot be assessed No distant metastases Distant metastases

16.6 Improving postoperative survival rates in colorectal adenocarcinoma

‘Improved surgical and anaesthetic management has had a major impact on overall survival. Preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates, but not overall survival. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival by 30% for stage III tumours and 2% for stage II tumours. Postoperative intensive follow-up is associated with a 9% survival improvement by identifying those with surgically salvageable relapse.’

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines for the Management of Colorectal Cancer 3rd edition (2007). http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/assets/documents/COLO_guides.pdf

Management of colorectal cancer. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (and update). Management of colorectal cancer. Guideline No 67. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/67/index.html

Wong RKS, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A. Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002102. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002102.pub2.

Midgley R, Kerr DJ. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer: the time is right! Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Jul;2(7):364-9. Review. PubMed PMID: 16075796.

Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, Thomé SD, Alberts SR, Haller DG, Benedetti J, Francini G, Shepherd LE, Francois Seitz J, Labianca R, Chen W, Cha SS, Heldebrant MP, Goldberg RM. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1797-806. Epub 2004 Apr 5. PubMed PMID: 15067028.

Adjuvant therapy

Radiotherapy

Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy has an important place in the management of rectal cancer, and so preoperative staging of rectal cancer is essential in order to plan optimal management. Radiotherapy has been shown to reduce local recurrence rates but there is no effect on overall survival (EBM 16.6). Most specialist centres in the UK offer selective preoperative radiotherapy for those at increased risk of local recurrence, because there is significant morbidity associated with pelvic irradiation and many patients will be cured by surgery alone. Risk factors include a low tumour, bulky fixed lesion, anterior lesion, evidence of T3 or T4 stage and/or involved lymph nodes on imaging. Either a 5-day short-course regimen of 45 Gy daily or a long-course regimen of 52 Gy given weekly over 3 months is administered. The former is reserved for patients with operable but tethered tumours or very low or anterior tumours, or if extra-rectal spread is evident. Fixed, inoperable tumours are best dealt with by radical radiotherapy over 3 months, and this may be combined with chemotherapy (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)). Postoperative radiotherapy results in poor bowel function and may damage the small intestine, and hence the importance of preoperative staging to guide administration of radiotherapy before surgery whenever possible.

Adjuvant chemotherapy

Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-FU alone or in combination with other agents has been shown to improve survival for Dukes’ C colorectal cancer after surgical resection (EBM 16.6). Intravenous regimens employing intravenous 5-FU has largely been replaced in current practice by targeting the same pathway through inhibition of thymidylate synthase using chemical inhibitors such as capecitabine. Capecitabine is less toxic than 5-FU and can be administered orally. There is an overall 30% improvement in survival for patients with Dukes’ C tumours who receive chemotherapy, equating with an 11% absolute improvement in survival for that group and a 6% overall improvement in survival for patients with colorectal cancer of all stages. In the UK, it is now routine practice to offer chemotherapy based on 5-FU to all patients with stage C cancers who do not have significant comorbidity, particularly cardiovascular disease. Regimens now routinely combine capecitabine with oxaliplatin as first line therapy. Recently, it has also been shown that Dukes’ B tumours gain modest survival benefit (∼︀2%). However, adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes’ B tumours is restricted to poor-prognosis lesions (poor differentiation, venous or lymphatic invasion). Capecitabine (or 5-FU) chemotherapy is considered a conventional ‘first-line’ chemotherapeutic regimen for colorectal cancer. Other newer agents, such as cetuximab (monoclonal antibody to epidermal growth factor receptor) and bevacizumab (antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor), have shown promise in patients with relapsed disease after first-line chemotherapy. Other agents such as temozolomide, used either alone or in combination with other standard agents are also used in relapsed disease and in trials. Although irinotecan (CPT-11) showed initial promise, a number of negative trials indicate it may only have a place in the management of a small selected subset of patients.

Palliative therapy

In addition to resection with curative intent, surgery can provide valuable palliation for patients with local disease relapse, hepatic or other distant metastases. This is achieved through ameliorating symptoms or by averting distressing features of advanced local disease. In some instances, diversion of the faecal stream through a defunctioning colostomy or ileostomy may be all that is feasible, but wherever possible it is preferable to resect the tumour and involved bowel in a formal way. Hence, the vast majority of patients undergo surgical resection, whether curative or palliative. In a small number of cases with poor functional status and/or extensive metastatic load and in whom surgical resection is relatively contraindicated, combined radiological and colonoscopic placement of an intraluminal expanding stent will palliate an obstructing colonic cancer.

Radiotherapy has an important role in palliation of locally advanced irresectable rectal cancer and can control pain, mucus discharge, disordered bowel habit, bleeding and faecal incontinence. It also has a value in palliation of rectal cancer recurrence and in alleviating bone pain from metastases. It may rarely be used to palliate locally invasive colonic cancer invading the abdominal wall, but this approach is restricted because the fields are difficult to define and damage to adjacent bowel is likely.

Palliative chemotherapy is now used extensively both to treat symptoms of disseminated disease, and to control disease progression and extend survival. This is especially the case with the introduction of oral capecitabine. Median life expectancy from diagnosis of hepatic metastases is now around 12–14 months.

Summary Box 16.5 Colorectal cancer

Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy, with 36 000 cases per annum in the UK

It is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in developed countries, accounting for 15% of all cancers in males and 12% in females, with a 5% lifetime risk

2–3% of patients present with synchronous tumours, and a further ∼︀3% develop metachronous tumours

Risk factors include male gender, increasing age, family history of an affected relative, ‘westernized’ diet, inflammatory bowel disease and pre-existing adenomatous polyps

Genes have been identified for a number of autosomal dominant colorectal cancer predisposition syndromes, accounting for ∼︀3% of all cases.

Around 35% of the aetiology of colorectal cancer is attributable to genetic factors and a number of common genetic variants have recently been identified, offering future potential for genetic profiling

Two-thirds of all large bowel cancers occur in the rectum and sigmoid colon, and the most common clinical features are alteration in bowel habit and the passage of blood per rectum

Diagnosis involves colonoscopy and biopsy, CT colonography, or barium enema (used less). Preoperative staging involves CT, MRI and PET-CT scanning

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, involving radical local clearance combined with regional lymphadenectomy

Adjuvant therapy options include preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer and postoperative chemotherapy

Pre-symptomatic diagnosis may be achieved by population screening using faecal occult blood testing or by surveillance colonoscopy in high-risk groups

Overall 5-year survival is 55%. Staging systems provide useful prognosis to guide therapy and inform patients of expected outcome.

Other malignant tumours of the large intestine

Colorectal adenocarcinoma dominates the incidence of large bowel cancer and all other malignant tumours are very rare in comparison.