The psychotherapies

Published on 24/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Psychiatry

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1280 times

CHAPTER 14 The psychotherapies

Psychotherapy is a broad term that encompasses anything from support of the individual through a time of personal turmoil to daily psychoanalysis conducted over years. Indeed, the term is probably so broad that it has become rather un-useful, and requires a descriptor to specify what is meant. Box 14.1 outlines the major types of psychotherapy.

Behavioural therapy

Behavioural therapy essentially encompasses techniques where a feared object or situation is faced rather than avoided. This can be done in vivo (i.e. in real life), or imaginally (i.e. the person summonses the image into their mind): the former is usually preferred, as it is easier to do and seems more powerful. Sometimes, the feared situation is such that it is impossible to reenact in vivo (e.g. post-traumatic stress disorder after a horrific fire). In such cases, imaginal exposure can be effective.

Behavioural therapy is usually undertaken in a step-wise manner, such that the patient constructs a hierarchy of fears and works at each step in an ongoing manner, akin to a runner getting fit according to a stepped exercise regime. The ‘least feared’ object or situation is tackled first, consolidated, and then the next task on the hierarchy is attempted. The therapist acts much like a sports coach—guiding, supporting and encouraging the individual to take the next step, and providing useful tips about how to motivate oneself and overcome the barriers to ‘getting fit’ again. The actual ‘work’ has to be performed by the patient, and they need to ‘stay with’ the anxiety aroused by the situation or feared object until their anxiety abates to a substantial degree. This is done repeatedly until that fear step is conquered, and the next step can be taken. The process is also referred to as exposure and response prevention (EX/RP), in that the patient ‘exposes’ themself to the feared situation, and does not give in to the urge to perform the usual ‘response’ (e.g. running away).

It can be useful to help the patient manage their overall anxiety, such that they employ, for example, slow-breathing techniques and positive self-talk to help them through the tasks. However, they do need to experience some degree of discomfort and anxiety at each step; otherwise, the step is not therapeutically useful. Some people employ techniques such as emotional withdrawal, ask others for reassurance, or resort to alcohol or benzodiazepines to deal with

anxiogenic situations: these can interfere with the therapeutic effect of behavioural therapy.

Occasionally, instead of a step-wise approach, the patient can be exposed in a single session to their most feared situation (e.g. the spider phobic allowing a tarantula to crawl on them). This is known as flooding.

Behavioural therapy is also the primary therapeutic modality in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Here the individual ‘faces’, again in a hierarchical manner, the fear associated with an obsessional thought. For example, the patient who repeatedly checks electrical appliances is tasked with switching the toaster on, then off, and checking just thrice rather than 30 times, and ‘stays with’ the anxiety this arouses, until it subsides. Again, this task is repeated until conquered, whereafter the next step is embraced (e.g. check just twice, and then only once). The patient must be reminded not to seek reassurance from others, and their family members should be coached as supportive co-therapists, rather than giving in to the reassurance-seeking of the patient, such as, for example, going and checking the toaster for them.

Cognitive therapy

The notion that un-useful cognitions drive depression and anxiety symptoms might seem obvious, but the utility of cognitive challenge in a therapeutic sense gained ascendancy only in the 1960s, with the work of, among others, Aaron T Beck. Beck postulated that people who are prone to depression (his initial focus) tend to see themselves, the world around them, and their future, in a negative way, and that they tend to have negative automatic thoughts in response to events in their world. He also identified a number of thinking traps people with depression tend to fall into (see Box 14.2).

Cognitive therapy involves helping individuals identify and challenge negative automatic thoughts. They are also taught to recognise their own thinking traps, and use this knowledge to assist them to face the world in a more positive manner. The patient is encouraged to keep a diary of negative thoughts, including rating to what extent they believe them (usually as a percentage). They then try to challenge these, and then rate whether the intensity of the belief has been eroded, and to what extent. This is done in an iterative way, and therapy sessions include looking over the diaries with the therapist, and working through examples together. A further technique is the so-called downward arrow, which seeks to explore the underlying schemas the individual holds.

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has become a ubiquitous approach to the management of many mental disorders. It integrates both behavioural and cognitive therapeutic techniques, and has shown proven benefit for milder forms of depression, and many of the anxiety disorders. It has also been applied to bipolar disorder and to persistent delusions and hallucinations in people with schizophrenia.

Asking what ‘the worst possible’ thing that might occur can help place the patient’s fears in some perspective. Helping the patient see themself more objectively can also be facilitated, for example, by asking them to imagine how they might respond to a friend who came to them with a problem similar to their own.

Dialectic behaviour therapy

Dialectic behaviour therapy (DBT) is a skills-based therapy which follows cognitive behavioural principles but with an emphasis upon acceptance of and by the person of their current maladaptive behaviours, combined with an expectation that these behaviours need to change. This combination creates a ‘dialectical tension’ (a concept drawn from philosophy) with the expectation of achieving a ‘synthesis’ which is more adaptive. This therapy was originally designed for the treatment of borderline personality disorder (cluster B), but has application in other disorders such as eating disorders and other personality disorders.

DBT aims to address four specific goals:

DBT encompasses group therapy aimed at developing ‘core mindfulness skills’ by increasing awareness of events, emotions and behaviours, and adopting a focused but non-judgmental attitude to these. The patient is also helped to develop: ‘interpersonal effectiveness skills’ to enable effective communication and to manage conflict more constructively; ‘emotional regulation skills’ through increased understanding of emotions and strategies for emotional regulation; and ‘distress tolerance skills’ through accepting life for the moment and tolerating momentary distress.

Individual therapy is provided in parallel to the group process, with an aim to reinforce group-therapy-derived skills and awareness, with greater focus upon individual needs. Intersession telephone contact is agreed upon as a strategy for contact between therapy sessions and is established with clear but strict boundaries. The contact focuses upon crisis intervention and the application of the above skills to coping ‘in the moment’. The patient is encouraged to tolerate the distress and to address this further in the next available therapy session.

CASE EXAMPLE: dialectic behaviour therapy

A 37-year-old married man presented with a history of a recurrent pattern, at times of stress, of self-injury (burning his skin with cigarettes), self-disgust, explosive rage, derogatory and command auditory hallucinations, and homicidal as well as suicidal thoughts. These episodes were highly distressing to his wife and on occasion he would leave home and stay on the farm of a relative to allow recovery from his distress and maladaptive behaviours. He exhibited strong motivation to change and considerable insight into his behaviour. However, he felt powerless to change. An important element of his history appeared to be violent sexual abuse as a child and the most potent life stresses appeared to relate to times of perceived loss of control, such as challenging times in his business.

He began DBT and found the group therapy plus homework self-monitoring particularly helpful. He felt understood and began to address the therapy approach with enthusiasm. Individual psychotherapy was more challenging as the intensity of emotion could be considerable at times and he appreciated having access to help between sessions. Over time, he established better mood regulation, improved stress management and more effective communication of his needs with others. His therapy is still in progress and there have continued to be times when brief admissions to hospital, at times of crisis, have been required. However, the intensity of his symptoms and the severity of self-harm, as well as rage, had improved.

Psychodynamic psychotherapy

This form of therapy owes much to Sigmund Freud, but subsequent workers refined, expanded upon and/or challenged his original views, as outlined in Box 14.3.

BOX 14.3 Freud and the post-Freudians

Freud’s original technique (psychoanalysis) involved asking the patient to ‘free-associate’, bringing to the session whatever came into their mind at the time. The therapist sat behind the patient, intervening only rarely and usually to suggest interpretations of what the patient had said. Freud also emphasised the importance of dreams, referring to them as ‘the royal road to the unconscious’, and offering interpretations thereof. Freud emphasised how the patient’s interaction with the therapist was a recapitulation of earlier life interactions (the transference), and that the therapist also reacted to the patient according to the therapist’s own earlier relationship experiences (the countertransference). A particular task of the therapist was to explore resistance on the part of the patient, to accepting the interpretations of the therapist.

Classical psychoanalysis is very time-consuming, entailing hourly sessions up to five times a week and conducted over months to years. Nowadays, most psychodynamic psychotherapists would see the patient less often, sit facing them during the sessions, and be more ‘active’ during sessions. Shorter duration of therapy, with a more clearly defined end-point, is also more common now.

Psychodynamic techniques are generally employed where the intent is to create lasting and profound change for the individual in terms of the way they see themselves. The patient needs to

CASE EXAMPLE: psychodynamic psychotherapy

A 38-year-old man presented with severe agoraphobia, which prevented a wide range of life activities. For example, he worked at a city store and would drive as close as possible to the store before he parked his vehicle. He would then run to the store wearing dark glasses, but then feel calm and relaxed once he was inside the store. A behavioural program of graded exposure was introduced, starting with the removal of his dark glasses. When he began his exposure treatment, he realised as he was running to work without glasses that he had been afraid of being recognised by others as his father’s son. He recalled that his father had been charged with a crime and sent to jail when the patient was a teenager. He had felt devastated by this event and progressively more anxious in public places because he felt he might be recognised and his embarrassment and shame exposed. The behaviour therapy continued successfully, and was facilitated by psychodynamic therapy which enabled him to explore his feelings about his father, the events which caused him so much shame, and the extent to which this had caused him to become crippled by unconscious defences such as denial (he had not been aware of the link to his father), reaction formation (he was a particularly upstanding member of the community) and projection (he perceived that others would be highly judgmental of him if they knew of his parentage). He responded to 20 sessions of psychodynamic psychotherapy and concurrent behaviour therapy.

show some degree of psychological mindedness, a commitment to attending sessions regularly and the resilience (ego strength) to tolerate the feelings evoked through exploration of unconscious issues. It is not appropriate in the face of severe depression or psychosis.

Family therapy

There are a number of ways in which families can be engaged in therapy. At its most basic, families with a member who has a psychiatric disorder can be brought together for the provision of psychoeducation, tips about how to recognise and effectively respond to symptoms and behaviours in the ill family member, suggestions about effective communication, and assistance with general problem solving.

Family therapy draws upon the principles of systems theory, which essentially recognises a system as a separate entity to its component parts. Thus, a family is seen as an entity in itself and the members of the family are simply the components which make up this new structure and organisation. In family therapy there is no identified person who is considered to be the patient. Rather, the family addresses the problems which exist as a whole. Everyone in the family is expected to contribute and to recognise the ways in which the operations of the family lead to certain problems arising, including emotional or behavioural problems in a particular family member.

There are a number of forms of family therapy which draw on different approaches. Generally, family therapists tend to use a combination of all of these models in different combinations for particular families. In some instances there will be an attempt to disrupt the structures which exist between individuals, with alterations in family alliances and activities together. Alternatively, it is sometimes very helpful to disrupt the family with a strategy which causes a substantial reorganisation of the family’s approach to life activities and problems.

More specific forms of family therapy are employed where the family itself is the ‘subject’. The Milan school approach uses circular questioning, reflecting family dynamics by asking one family member to conjecture how others might view a particular issue, while the others can be asked to comment or make suggestions for change. The narrative approach looks at the ways families see themselves and their history, and suggests that other, more adaptive ‘stories’ might be usefully integrated into the family’s way of functioning.

The use of a one-way mirror, with the family and primary therapist on one side, and the other members of the therapy team on the other, can be a useful tool for family therapy. The primary therapist can be prompted by other team members (through an earpiece) to ask or pose particular problems or scenarios to the family in question. After each session, the team can jointly reflect upon the dynamics they have observed in the session, and suggest ways of taking the therapy forward in future sessions.

Couple therapy

There are a number of different approaches to helping couples as a dyad. These include behavioural, cognitive behavioural and psychodynamic approaches. Systems theory, as used in family therapy groups, can also be employed. Skilled therapists can use a number of these different approaches in an integrated manner, depending upon the clinical problem and what the couple bring to the session. Couple therapy can be modified for specific situations (e.g. sex therapy).

CASE EXAMPLE: how different psychological approaches may be applied (supplied by Dr Ed Harari (‘EH’), St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne)

A 40-year-old, hitherto successful professional man (‘John’), presented with a 6-month history of increasingly severe clinical features of depression, precipitated by his wife’s discovery of his marital infidelities and the subsequent breakdown of his marriage. The latter had recently culminated in John being forcibly evicted from the family home by a court order sought by his wife. He rented a small flat, where he sat alone most nights, drinking heavily and refusing to answer telephone calls from concerned family and friends. While he reluctantly went to work most days, he knew that his work performance was deteriorating. When interviewed, he denied suicidal intent, but through tears and exclamations of distress he insisted that he had irreparably destroyed his wife’s life, that he was condemned to be a social outcast and that his life was a failure.

A psychodynamic approach proceeded with the therapist empathising with John’s obvious distress, then gently enquiring about the insistent, adamant manner with which he criticised himself even though he was obviously suffering.

EH: John, such self-criticism feels to me that you are being harsh, almost cruel to yourself, even though you are in obvious emotional pain.

John: (angrily) I’ve always thought I was a weak bastard. (silence, then more softly) Even when I was doing well, I always had this feeling that I didn’t really have what it takes.

EH: Do you mean that despite your outer achievements you didn’t feel very confident or worthwhile about yourself? (empathic comment) (John nods, cries silently)

EH: You’ve doubted yourself? For a long time? That sounds very painful, and lonely. (empathic comment)

John then began to speak about the shock of his mother’s death when he was 6 years old. He described some of the confusion and feelings of helplessness he had at that time, and his father’s expectations of him (in John’s view) that he, John, should be strong and stoical. John’s voice rose angrily again as he declared how disgusted his father would have been at his recent infidelity.

EH: John, you seem to be saying that what you saw as your dad’s expectations and judgments of you, especially when you were feeling small and alone and very sad, has something to do with how you criticise and judge yourself now. (interpretation)

John: He was a man of his time. He became Director of … at the age of 37, but he didn’t know much about fathering. His father had been in the war, and came back a changed man; that’s what my mother told me about my grandfather. When my mother died, Dad remarried after a few months and went on as if nothing had happened. He expected me to do the same. (angrily, mockingly) So tell me doc, what do ya reckon, am I worth a bullet through the head? What do you do with weak bastards like me—give ’em shock treatment? You’re a busy man, doc; I don’t think you’d want much to do with a failed Casanova.

EH: We will need to talk about your mum and how you lost her, and other things, including how you might have lost your wife. (allusion to a repetitive pattern in his life) But I wonder if you are expecting me to criticise you when I ask you about your pain, the same way you’ve taken on your father’s judgments and criticise yourself? (interpretation of possible negative paternal transference to EH as well as alluding to John identifying with his critical father)

In subsequent therapy sessions, the theme of John’s life-long tendency to self-criticism was explored in great detail. His tendency to deny vulnerability in himself, but to perceive it in women, became clear. His tendency to scorn vulnerability in himself while wishing to protect the vulnerability in his wife emerged as a major unconscious conflict in his marriage, which had led him to feel resentful, discontented and to enact this in the occasional but recurring brief infidelities throughout his marriage. Psychodynamic psychotherapy aims to replace such emotionally driven, often-rationalised enactments with self-understanding.

A cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) approach might respectfully invite John to examine his loudly proclaimed belief that his wife’s life was irreparably damaged as a result of his infidelity. From what he had witnessed and others had told him, John knew that she was distressed and angry, but that she was receiving support from her family and friends. Did he believe that her distress would last for ever? So John’s catastrophic thinking could be challenged, especially when he was invited to speculate about whether her obtaining a court order against him was the mark of an irreparably damaged woman or a very angry one? Furthermore, he knew that she had been out on a few occasions with some close (female) friends. Was this the sign of an irreparably damaged woman? What were the chances that if her friends continued to support her in this way that eventually they might introduce her to an eligible man? Would she be ‘too damaged’ to accept his invitation for a date?

Similarly, his overgeneralisation and black-or-white style of thinking could be challenged when he concluded that his failure in marriage meant that he had failed in life. He was encouraged to list and describe some of his genuine achievements in his life, including professional, philanthropic and social. Without discounting the distress at his failed marriage, his complete negation of other areas of success could be presented as a distortion of reality.

An example of his tendency to selective attention centred on his conclusion following some rather mild expression of disappointment in him from his father-in-law that he (John) was viewed with contempt by others. This conclusion ignored the efforts of several concerned friends to contact him, and some obviously sad, but kindly words expressed by his mother-in-law. Even his father-in-law’s comments could be viewed from the perspective of a father’s protective concern for his daughter, rather than a final verdict about John.

If John’s depression was judged to be severe enough to prevent him from genuine participation in psychotherapy, or if his condition deteriorated further, antidepressant medication would be indicated and hospitalisation considered. Therapy could resume when the depression had improved. If these measures did not reduce his misuse of alcohol, participation in an alcohol detoxification program could be advised.

If John had concerns about his children, either fearing for their emotional wellbeing or disturbed by what he believed might be their negative opinions of him, it might be possible, if his wife agreed, to arrange some family therapy in which John met with his children to discuss his concerns. Marital therapy would be relevant if the couple considered possible reconciliation, or were unable to agree on practical ways of arranging their lives as co-parents.

Armed with some of the insights from individual therapy about his anger at his own vulnerability and how he projected such vulnerability onto women, yet still unsure how to relate to women without becoming excessively solicitous and deferential, John might be offered group therapy in which he might learn more about his feelings as he interacted with other members of the group, the ways others viewed him and how they dealt with conflicts over loss and self-assertion in their own lives. This could also help overcome John’s feelings of isolation and of being uniquely flawed.