The periapical tissues

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2470 times

The periapical tissues

Normal radiographic appearances

A reminder of the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the hard tissues surrounding the teeth in the maxilla and mandible, which contributes to the two-dimensional periapical radiographic image, is given in Fig. 21.1.

The appearances of normal, healthy, periapical tissues vary from one patient to another, from one area of the mouth to another and at different stages in the development of the dentition. These different normal appearances are described below.

The periapical tissues of permanent teeth (Fig. 21.2)

The three most important features to observe are:

image
Fig. 21.2 Periapical radiographs of A image, B image, C image (compare with Fig. 21.1Bi) showing the normal radiographic anatomy of the periapical tissues in different parts of the jaws. Note the continuous radiolucent line of the periodontal ligament shadow and the radiopaque line of the lamina dura outlining the roots.

These features hold the key to the interpretation of periapical radiographs, since changes in their thickness, continuity and radiodensity reflect the presence of any underlying disease, as described later.

The effects of normal superimposed shadows

Normal anatomical shadows superimposed on the apical tissues can be either radiolucent or radiopaque, depending on the structure involved.

Radiolucent shadows

Examples include:

Such cavities in the alveolar bone decrease the total amount of bone that would normally contribute to the final radiographic image, with the following effects:

• The radiolucent line of the periodontal ligament may appear MORE radiolucent or widened, but will still be continuous and well demarcated

• The radiopaque line of the lamina dura may appear LESS obvious and may not be visible

• There will be an area of radiolucency in the alveolar bone at the tooth apex (see Figs 21.5 and 21.6).

Radiographic appearances of periapical inflammatory changes

Types of inflammatory changes

Following pulpal necrosis, either an acute or chronic inflammatory response is initiated in the apical tissues. The inflammatory response is identical to that set up elsewhere in the body from other toxic stimuli, and exhibits the same signs and symptoms.

Cardinal signs of acute inflammation

These include:

In the apical tissues, inflammatory exudate accumulates in the apical periodontal ligament space (swelling), setting up an acute apical periodontitis. The affected tooth becomes periostitic or tender to pressure (pain), and the patient avoids biting on the tooth (loss of function). Heat and redness are clinically undetectable. These signs are accompanied by destruction and resorption, often of the tooth root, and of the surrounding bone, as a periapical abscess develops, and radiographically a periapical radiolucent area becomes evident.

Hallmarks of chronic inflammation

These include the processes of destruction and healing which are going on simultaneously, as the body’s defence systems respond to, and try to confine, the spread of the infection. In the apical tissues, a periapical granuloma forms at the apex and dense bone is laid down around the area of resorption. Radiographically, the apical radiolucent area becomes circumscribed and surrounded by dense sclerotic bone. Occasionally, under these conditions of chronic inflammation, the epithelial cell rests of Malassez are stimulated to proliferate and form an inflammatory periapical radicular cyst (see Ch. 26) or there is an acute exacerbation producing another abscess (the so-called phoenix abscess).

The type and progress of the inflammatory response at the apex and the subsequent spread of apical infection is dependent on several factors relating to:

The result is a wide spectrum of events ranging from a very rapidly spreading acute periapical abscess to a very slowly progressing chronic periapical granuloma or cyst. This variation in the underlying disease processes is mirrored radiographically, although it is often not possible to differentiate between an abscess, granuloma or cyst.

A summary of the different inflammatory effects and the resultant radiographic appearances is shown in Table 21.1. The effects are shown diagrammatically in Fig. 21.8. Various examples are shown in Figs 21.921.12.

Table 21.1

Summary of the effects of different inflammatory processes on the periapical tissues and the resultant radiographic appearances

State of inflammation Underlying inflammatory changes Radiographic appearances
Initial acute inflammation Inflammatory exudate accumulates in the apical periodontal ligament space – acute apical periodontitis Widening of the radiolucent line of the periodontal ligament space
OR
No apparent changes evident
Initial spread of inflammation Resorption and destruction of the apical bony socket – periapical abscess Loss of the radiopaque line of the lamina dura at the apex
Further spread of inflammation Further resorption and destruction of the apical alveolar bone Area of bone loss at the tooth apex
Initial low-grade chronic inflammation Minimal destruction of the apical bone The body’s defence systems lay down dense bone in the apical region No apparent bone destruction but dense sclerotic bone evident around the tooth apex (sclerosing osteitis)
Latter stages of chronic inflammation Apical bone is resorbed and destroyed and dense bone is laid down around the area of resorption – periapical granuloma or radicular cyst Circumscribed, well-defined radiolucent area of bone loss at the apex, surrounded by dense sclerotic bone

Treatment and radiographic follow-up

Most inflammatory periapical lesions, and teeth damaged by minor trauma, are treated by conventional endondontic therapy. If endodontic treatment is clinically unsuccessful, subsequent treatment involves either:

The main recommendations of the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)’s 2013 Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography booklet regarding imaging the periapical tissues in relation to endodontics are summarised in Table 21.2.

Table 21.2

Summary of the main recommendations for imaging the periapical tissues in relation to endodontics, based on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK)’s 2013 Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography (3rd Ed)

Recommendation Evidence-based Grading*
A good quality pre-operative paralleling technique periapical radiograph is essential for the diagnosis of endodontic problems B
At least one good quality paralleling technique periapical radiograph is necessary to confirm working length(s) B
If there are any doubts about the integrity of the apical constriction or resistance taper of the prepared root canal, a mid-fill periapical radiograph should be taken to confirm the position of the root filling before final compaction is carried out C
At least one post-operative radiograph is necessary to assess the success of the obturation, and to act as a baseline for assessment of apical disease or healing B
A further good quality follow-up paralleling technique periapical radiograph should be taken at one year after completion of treatment (see Fig 21.13) B
A good quality paralleling technique periapical baseline radiograph is essential in treatment planning in vital pulp procedures C
A good quality paralleling technique periapical baseline radiograph is essential for the management of minor dental trauma C
Post-trauma follow-up radiographs should be taken 6 months after treatment, and then annually until root formation is complete C
While expert opinion supports the taking of review radiographs, there is no evidence to support any particular frequency or duration of review C
CBCT is not indicated as a standard method for the demonstration of root canal anatomy but small volume, high resolution CBCT may be indicated in selected cases C

*Evidence-based grading B = based on evidence from well conducted clinical studies but with no specific in vitro validation studies; C = based on evidence from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities and indicates an absence of directly applicable studies of good quality.

Other important causes of periapical radiolucency

Many of the conditions described in Chapters 26 and 27 can present occasionally in the apical region of the alveolar bone. Some can simulate the simple inflammatory changes described above, including:

Although it is uncommon, clinicians should still be alert to the possibility that malignant lesions can present as apparently simple localized areas of infection. The signs of concern include:

Suggested guidelines for interpreting periapical images

Although somewhat repetitive, this methodical approach to radiographic interpretation is so important, and so often ignored, that it is described again.

Overall critical assessment

A typical series of questions that should be asked about the quality of a periapical radiographic image based on the ideal quality criteria described in Chapter 9 include: