The masseters and their treatment with botulinum toxin

Published on 26/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2148 times

20 The masseters and their treatment with botulinum toxin

History

Following on from earlier experience by Jancovic & Orman in treating other facial dystonias with botulinum toxin, investigators including Lagueny et al and Van Zandijcke & Marchau turned their attention to the treatment of bruxism. Amongst the earliest use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of bruxism associated with masseteric (and temporalis) hypertrophy was by the latter group; this was an unusually severe case of a 32-year-old woman who, following a motor car accident and brain contusion, was beginning to communicate after a prolonged coma. Although she obeyed verbal commands, she had developed severe bruxism and ‘the teeth grinding was very loud and almost continuous causing damage to the teeth and annoyance to nearby patients’. In this case 25 units were injected into each temporalis and each masseter muscle, which is, somewhat surprisingly, a similar dose to an initial dosing in todays cases. The treatment of masseteric hypertrophy soon became more widespread and today is a mainstream treatment for this condition replacing surgery in many cases. In the treatment of bruxism it has a definite place alongside and in many cases replacing splints and orthodontic techniques in selected patients.

Evidence has begun to accumulate that the masseteric hypertrophy has other effects besides the bulk it directly confers because of the muscle volume. In line with theories of bone deposition and development, Wu found in 2010 that this muscle development may have effects on the underlying bone growth and volume. Bone growth and volume are under the influence and related to the activity of the muscles attached to the bone. A bone responds to the activity and strength of the muscles attached to it by thickening and the corollary is that bone will decrease when the muscular force acting on the bone is decreased, as reported by Tsai et al. Molina et al found that the masseter neuromuscular end plates are developed by 12 weeks’ fetal gestation. By restraining mouth opening, Habib and co-workers showed by the use of suturing that restricted fetal temporomandibular joint movement influences the process of endochondral bone formation of condylar cartilage. These effects on bone may explain the trimming effect that botulinum toxin has on the facial shape may be above and beyond the effects of what would be expected by a decrease in muscle bulk alone (Fig. 20.1). However, not all authors (e.g. Chang et al) believe that bony resorption occurs after botulinum toxin injection.

One of the great determinants of beauty is facial shape. In males a square facial shape is considered desirable, but this should not be a bottom- heavy face with a wider lower face than an upper face. In females this is more of an issue, with youth and beauty being related to an oval, triangular or heart-shaped face.

Anatomy

Raison d’être for botulinum injection of the masseters in the lower face

Most often botulinum toxin is injected into the masseter muscles to decrease the effect of masseter hypertrophy. This hypertrophy may occur from many reasons; there is probably some genetic component, with East Asians seemingly over-represented in the severe end of the spectrum of muscle excess. In some, the development of masseteric hypertrophy is as simple as developing a habit of chewing a food item such as chewing gum or dried foodstuffs recurrently, but in many it is a side effect of the common psychosocial habit of jaw clenching or bruxism. Sometimes bruxism will be seen without a lot of masseter hypertrophy and attention should be directed elsewhere in the search of its cause, such as the temporalis muscle or disorders of the temporomandibular joint or malocclusion issues, which are beyond the scope of this chapter.

Treatment of the masseter muscle for shaping and beautification of the lower face

Aesthetic recontouring of the lower face has been gradually developing as a concept initially with East Asian patients, but more recently also in Western patients. There has been a gradual increase in understanding of the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of masseteric hypertrophy to promote a better facial appearance and enhance beauty. However, there is a definite gender difference in what is perceived to be attractive. Male facial shape is ideally full of sharp angles. The ideal facial female shape has been stated to be heart shaped, oval or base-up triangular or similar (Fig. 20.3).

There are many surgical procedures that have been described to decrease width of the lower third of the face, for example by Yang et al and Ying et al, and there is general agreement that attractiveness in female faces has as one of its components an aesthetically pleasing angles of the lower third of the face. In 2011 Liew looked at the similarities in truly beautiful people in different racial groups, and found that if one transposes a vertical line from the midline to intersect with the angle cast between the line drawn along the body of the mandible and tissue overlying the ascending ramus of the mandible it will form an acute angle (Fig. 20.4A–C). This angle is more acute (a lower angle) if the facial shape is square, such as one cast with masseter hypertrophy or parotid enlargement. It is less acute or greater if the facial shape is more triangular or the lower facial width is decreased. Hence, in Figure 20.3, one can see the improvement in attractiveness as one moves towards a greater ‘angle of beauty’, the ideal being 9–12°.

Wu has also published results on the role of trimming parotid enlargement (which sits posterior to the enlargement produced by masseteric bulk) to further refine the cosmetic appearance of the lower face. Kwon et al reported that injection into the masseter has no effect on salivary flow rates, but injection into the parotid directly would certainly be expected to diminish salivary output. Wu noted that none of his patients suffered from symptoms of dry mouth after the parotids were injected for hypertrophy; the fullness shown by parotid enlargement may be missed as it may merge with the posterior border of the masseteric hypertrophy and be apparent only after masseter injection. Rarely, as Reddy et al found, masseteric hypertrophy may be associated with obstructive parotitis from obstruction of Stensen’s duct.

Treatment method

Injecting masseters

In the author’s method, 100 units of botulinum toxin (abobotulinum toxin) were dissolved in 2 mL of sterile normal saline, yielding a concentration of 5 units per 0.1 mL. The intended dose was drawn into a 1 mL syringe and the solution was injected with a 32 mm long (image inch) 30-gauge hypodermic needle.

The patient is asked to clench the jaw and the masseter palpated, outlining the anterior and posterior borders of the masseter muscle. Three to five injection points are used depending on the masseter bulk and markings placed at the site of maximum bulge, which is usually in the lower half of the muscle. The injection points are placed below a line drawn from the tragus to the angle of the mouth (see Fig. 20.2) and at least 1 cm from the borders of the muscles. Injecting outside these limits may interfere with other masticatory muscles, especially superolaterally, and the salivary glands posteriorly and inferiorly. The injections are placed deeply, as superficial placement may not reach the deeper heads of the muscle and produce n appearance of a chipmunk chewing on nuts when the patient is eating. Possibly this is due to the action of the functional deep head pushing against a treated and flaccid superficial head.

The dose depends on the bulk of the muscle being treated. In general Caucasian patients will require less than East Asian patients (Liew and Dart 2010) and males more than females. Most often, Caucasian females will require 15–25 units per side, whereas East Asian females may require 30–50 units per side. Males may need 10 units or so more than their female counterparts.

Masseter treatments may be repeated at 1–3-monthly intervals until the desired shape is attained (Fig. 20.5). Patients will readily report most often that their jaw clenching, morning headaches, sore teeth or other symptoms are better even after the first injection session. However, if symptoms are not improved or substantially settled this is a sign for reinjection of similar dose, otherwise often a lower dose than initially may be used.

Quite often there will be asymmetry to the masseteric hypertrophy or even unilateral hypertrophy. Doses should be tailored to this event but, unless it is totally unilateral, often it is better to inject some on both sides but more obviously on the palpably stronger and visibly bigger side (Fig. 20.6).

Whether or not one treats the temporalis muscle depends on a number of factors. One should observe the patient’s temporal fossa area when clenching or chewing for obvious signs of hypertrophy. If it is not obviously hypertrophic at rest with a marked convexity to the temple and bulging on mastication, I do not inject this at the first injection session. However, if it is then, similar to the masseter, it is injected according to its bulk in a number of injection points (usually three) in the area of maximum projection. However, unlike the change of facial shape produced by masseter injection, a hollow temple looks cadaveric and unattractive whereas a flat or slightly convex one is quite youthful. If a patient is complaining of bruxism and injection of apparent masseteric hypertrophy is insufficient to settle symptoms then injection of hypertrophic temporalis is indicated.

If there is a reversible element in the history such as a chewing habit (chewing gum, dried foods or other food oddities) then ceasing this and injecting the masseters a couple of times may be all that is required to change things in the long term.

Further reading

Ahlberg J, Rantala M, Savolainen A, et al. Reported bruxism and stress experience. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2002;30:405–408.

Ahn J, Horn C, Blitzer A. Botulinum toxin for masseter reduction in Asian patients. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2004;6:188–191.

Berkovitz B, Kirsch C, Moxham BJ, et al. Interactive Head and Neck. Primal Pictures Ltd; 2003. Software version 1.10

Chang CS, Bergeron L, Yu CC, et al. Mandible changes evaluated by computed tomography following Botulinum Toxin A injections in square-faced patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2011;35:452–455. Epub 2010 Nov 20

Habib H, Hatta T, Udagawa J, et al. Fetal jaw movement affects condylar cartilage development. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:474–479.

Iglesias-Linares A, Yáñez-Vico RM, et al. Common standards in facial esthetics: craniofacial analysis of most attractive black and white subjects according to People magazine during previous 10 years. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;69(6):e216–24. Epub 2011 Apr 5

Jankovic J, Orman J. Botulinum A toxin for cranial-cervical dystonia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 1987;37:616–623.

Kim NH, Chung JH, Park RH, et al. The use of botulinum toxin type A in aesthetic mandibular contouring. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2005;115:919–930.

Kwon JS, Kim ST, Jeon YM, et al. Effect of botulinum toxin type A injection into human masseter muscle on stimulated parotid saliva flow rate. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;38:316–320. Epub 2009 Feb 23

Lagueny A, Deliac MM, Julien J, et al. Jaw closing spasm – a form of focal dystonia? An electrophysiological study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1989;52:652–655.

Lavigne GJ, Montplaisir JY. Restless legs syndrome and sleep bruxism: prevalence and association among Canadians. Sleep. 1994;17:739–743.

Liew S 2011 Presentation, Hong Kong, December 9

Liew S, Dart A. Nonsurgical reshaping of the lower face. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2008;28:251–257.

Molina W, Reyes E, Joshi N, et al. Maturation of the neuromuscular junction in masseters of human fetus. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2010;51:537–541.

Moore AP, Wood GD. The medical management of masseteric hypertrophy with botulinum toxin type A. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1994;32:26–28.

Reddy R, White DR, Gillespie MB. Obstructive parotitis secondary to an acute masseteric bend. ORL Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialties. 2012;74(1):12–15. Epub 2011 Dec 8

Santamato A, Panza F, Di Venere D, et al. Effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A treatment of neck pain related to nocturnal bruxism: a case report. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2010;9(3):132–137.

Smyth AG. Botulinum toxin type A treatment of bilateral masseteric hypertrophy. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1994;32:29–33.

Tsai CY, Chiu WC, Liao YH, et al. Effects on craniofacial growth and development of unilateral botulinum neurotoxin injection into the masseter muscle. American Journal of Orthodontal and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009;135(2):142.e1–142.e6. discussion 142–143

Tsai CY, Shyr YM, Chiu WC, et al. Bone changes in the mandible following botulinum neurotoxin injections. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;33(2):132–138. Epub 2010 Sep 30

Van Zandijcke M, Marchau MM. Treatment of bruxism with botulinum toxin injections. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1990;53:530.

Wu WT. Botox facial slimming / facial sculpting: the role of botulinum toxin-A in the treatment of hypertrophic masseteric muscle and parotid enlargement to narrow the lower facial width. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2010;18:133–140.

Yang J, Wang L, Xu H, et al. Mandibular oblique ostectomy: an alternative procedure to reduce the width of the lower face. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2009;20(suppl 2):1822–1826.

Ying B, Wu S, Yan S, et al. Intraoral multistage mandibular angle ostectomy: 10 years’ experience in mandibular contouring in Asians. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2011;22(1):230–232.