The ECG in Patients with Chest Pain

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1363 times

5

The ECG in Patients with Chest Pain

HISTORY AND EXAMINATION

There are many causes of chest pain. All the non-cardiac conditions can mimic a myocardial infarction, and so the ECG can be extremely useful when making a diagnosis. However, the ECG is less important than the history and (to a lesser extent) the physical examination, because the ECG can be normal in the first few hours of a myocardial infarction.

Some causes of chest pain are listed in Box 5.1.

The ECG in Figure 5.1 was recorded in an A & E department from a 44-year-old man with rather vague chest pain. He was thought to have a viral illness and his ECG was considered to be within normal limits. He was allowed home, and died later that day. The post-mortem examination showed a myocardial infarction which was probably a few hours old, and corresponded with his A & E attendance.

ACUTE CHEST PAIN

The features of acute chest pain associated with different causes are summarized in Box 5.2.

The physical examination of a patient with chest pain may reveal nothing other than the signs associated with the pain itself (anxiety, sinus tachycardia, restlessness or a cold and sweaty skin), but some specific signs are worth looking for:

CHRONIC CHEST PAIN

The main differential diagnosis of chronic chest pain is between angina and the chest pain that is common in middle-aged men, but for which no clear diagnosis is usually made. This pain is sometimes called ‘atypical chest pain’, but this is a dangerous diagnostic label because it implies that there is a diagnosis (by implication, cardiac ischaemia) but that the symptoms are ‘atypical’. Some of these pains are musculoskeletal, Tietze’s syndrome of pain from the costochondral junctions being the most obvious, but in most cases the best diagnostic label is ‘chest pain of unknown cause’. This indicates a possible need for later re-evaluation.

The important features in the history that point to a diagnosis of angina are that the pain:

The physical signs to look for are:

THE ECG IN PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA

Myocardial infarction is, properly, a term describing myocardial cell death due to ischaemia. The histological changes – and ECG changes – can take several hours to appear, and the entire process leading to a healed infarction can take 5 or 6 weeks. Myocardial injury causes release into the blood of biomarkers such as troponin T or I and the MB fraction of creatine kinase, CK-MB. Therefore the release of these biomarkers can reflect the necrosis of myocardial cells, but it also occurs in situations other than coronary artery occlusion ( Box 5.3). Thus, although a rise in the blood levels of biomarkers supports the diagnosis of myocardial infarction it is not sufficient, and the most commonly used parts of the ‘universal definition’ of myocardial infarction, require both clinical evidence of myocardial ischaemia and a rise and/or fall of blood troponin levels. Box 5.4 shows the types of infarction listed in the universal definition, drawn up by the ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force (Jaffe, A.S., Simoons, M.L., Chaitman, B.R. and White, H.D., on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2551–2567). Box 5.5 lists the diagnostic criteria for each type of infarction.

The universal definition does not use the term ‘acute coronary syndrome’ at all, although this is a term in widespread clinical use, albeit with variations in what should be included. The term is most commonly used to describe patients with a clinical ‘coronary event’ of various types, including:

and sometimes

‘Stable angina’ is an entirely proper diagnostic label for a patient with intermittent chest pain associated with transient ECG changes, and ‘chest pain of unknown cause’ is the best label if no diagnosis has been made.

ECG CHANGES IN ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (STEMI)

The sequence of features characteristic of STEMI is:

The universal definition of STEMI requires new ST segment elevation at the J point (the junction of the S wave and the ST segment) in two contiguous leads, with the cut-off points in leads V2-V3 at > 0.3 mV in men or > 0.15 mV in women, and in other leads at > 0.1 mV. The ECG leads that show the changes typical of a myocardial infarction depend on the part of the heart affected.

INFERIOR INFARCTION

Figures 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 show traces taken from a patient with a typical history of myocardial infarction: on admission to hospital, 3 h later, and 2 days later. The main changes are in the inferior leads: II, III and VF. Here the ST segments are initially raised, but then Q waves appear and the T waves become inverted. Figure 5.2 includes coronary angiograms showing the effects of an occluded right coronary artery in an inferior STEMI.

ANTERIOR AND LATERAL INFARCTION

The changes of anterior infarction are seen in leads V2-V5. Lead V1 which lies over the right ventricle, is seldom affected (see Fig. 5.5, which includes corresponding coronary angiograms).

When the lateral wall of the left ventricle is damaged by occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery, leads I, VL and V6 will show infarction changes. Figure 5.6 shows the record of a patient with an acute lateral STEMI, with the corresponding coronary angiograms. Figure 5.7 shows a record taken 3 days after a lateral infarction, with Q waves and inverted T waves in leads I, VL and V6.

The ECG in Figure 5.8 shows an acute STEMI affecting both the anerior and lateral parts of the left ventricle.

The ECG in Figure 5.9 was recorded several weeks after an anterolateral myocardial infarction. Although the changes in leads I and VL appear ‘old’, having an isoelectric ST segment, there is still ST segment elevation in leads V3-V5. If the patient had just been admitted to hospital with chest pain these changes would be taken to indicate an acute infarction, but this patient had had pain more than a month previously. Persistent ST segment elevation is quite common after an anterior infarction: it sometimes indicates the development of a left ventricular aneurysm, but it is not reliable evidence of this.

An old anterior infarction often causes only what is called ‘poor R wave progression’. Figure 5.10 shows the record from a patient who had had an anterior infarction some years previously. A normal ECG would show a progressive increase in the size of the R wave from lead V1 to V5 or V6. In this case the R wave remains very small in leads V3 and V4, but becomes normal-sized in V5. This loss of ‘progression’ indicates the old infarction.

The time taken for the various ECG changes of infarction to occur is extremely variable, and the ECG is an unreliable way of deciding when an infarction occurred. Serial records showing progressive changes are the only way of timing the infarction from the ECG.

POSTERIOR INFARCTION

It is possible to ‘look at’ the back of the heart by placing the V lead on the back of the left side of the chest, but this is not done routinely because it is inconvenient and the complexes recorded are often small.

An infarction of the posterior wall of the left ventricle can, however, be detected from the ordinary 12-lead ECG because it causes a dominant R wave in lead V1. Normally the left ventricle, being more muscular than the right, exerts a greater influence on the ECG, so in lead V1 the QRS complex is predominantly downward. With a posterior infarction, the rearward-moving electrical forces are lost, so lead V1 ‘sees’ the unopposed forward-moving depolarization of the right ventricle, and records a predominantly upright QRS complex.

Figure 5.11 shows the first record from a patient with acute chest pain. There is a dominant R wave in lead V1 and ischaemic ST segment depression (see p. 231) in leads V2-V4. The chest electrodes were then moved to the V7-V9 positions: all in the same horizontal plane as V5, with V7 on the posterior axillary line, V9 at the edge of the spine, and V8 halfway between, on the midscapular line. The ECG record then showed raised ST segments, with Q waves typical of an acute infarction.

RIGHT VENTRICULAR INFARCTION

Inferior infarction is sometimes associated with infarction of the right ventricle. Clinically, this is suspected in a patient with an inferior infarction when the lungs are clear but the jugular venous pressure is elevated. The ECG will show raised ST segments in leads recorded from the right side of the heart. The positions of the leads correspond to those on the left side as follows: V1R is in the normal V2 position; V2R is in the normal Vi position; V3R etc. are on the right side, in positions corresponding to V3 etc. on the left side. Figure 5.12 is from a patient with an acute right ventricular infarct.

MULTIPLE INFARCTIONS

Infarction of more than one part of the left ventricle causes changes in several different ECG territories. This usually implies disease in more than one of the main coronary arteries. The ECG in Figure 5.13 shows an acute inferior myocardial infarction and marked anterior ST segment depression. Later, coronary angiography showed that this patient had a significant stenosis of the left main coronary artery.

Fig. 5.14 is the record from a patient with an acute inferior myocardial infarction. Poor R wave progression in leads V2-V4 indicates an old anterior infarction as well.

Figure 5.15 is an ECG showing an acute inferior STEMI and anterior T wave inversion due to an NSTEMI of uncertain age.

Figure 5.16 is an ECG showing an acute anterior myocardial infarction. Deep Q waves in leads III and VF indicate an old inferior infarction.

BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Left bundle branch block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is very rare in patients with totally normal hearts, but it may be associated with many different heart diseases ( Box 5.6).

With LBBB, the abnormal and slow conduction in to the left ventricle, and the abnormal pattern of repolarization, mean that no changes due to myocardial infarction can be seen ( Fig. 5.17). However, this does not mean that the ECG can be totally disregarded. If a patient has chest pain that could be ischaemic and the ECG shows LBBB that is known to be new, it can be assumed that an acute infarction has occurred and appropriate treatment should be given.

Figure 5.18 is the record from another patient presenting with chest pain who had LBBB, but there are important differences compared to Figure 5.17. Peaked P waves suggest right atrial hypertrophy. ‘Clockwise rotation’ with no left ventricular QRS complex pattern in lead V6 raises the possibility of either a pulmonary embolus (see p. 247) or chronic lung disease.

Right bundle branch block

Right bundle branch block (RBBB) will not necessarily obscure the pattern of inferior infarction ( Fig. 5.19).

Anterior infarction is more difficult to detect, but RBBB does not affect the ST segment and when this is raised in a patient who clinically has had an infarction, the change is probably significant ( Fig. 5.20).

ST segment depression associated with RBBB indicates ischaemia ( Fig. 5.21). However, T wave inversion in the anterior leads ( Fig. 5.22) is more difficult to interpret because it is a common feature of RBBB itself.

ECG CHANGES IN NON-ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (NSTEMI)

When the infarction does not involve the whole thickness of the ventricular wall, no electrical ‘window’ will be formed so there will be no Q waves: hence the term ‘non-Q wave infarction’, although this has now been superseded by the term ‘NSTEMI’. The infarction causes an abnormality of repolarization that leads to T wave inversion. This pattern is most commonly seen in the anterior and lateral leads ( Fig. 5.23).

This ECG pattern used to be called ‘subendocardial infarction’, but the pathological changes seen in heart muscle after myocardial infarction often do not fit neatly into ‘subendocardial’ or ‘full thickness’ patterns. Acute NSTEMI is usually associated with a rise in the blood troponin level. Compared with patients with STEMIs, those with NSTEMIs have a lower immediate fatality rate but a relatively high incidence of reinfarction during the following 3 months; thereafter their fatality rates are similar.

ISCHAEMIA WITHOUT MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Cardiac ischaemia causes horizontal ST segment depression; to be diagnostic of ischaemia, there must be horizontal or downward-sloping depression of > 0.05 mV in two contiguous leads, and/or T wave inversion of > 0.1 mV in two contiguous leads. Such changes appear and disappear with the pain of stable angina. Persistent pain and ST segment depression ( Fig. 5.24) may not be associated with any rise in troponin level.

If a patient has chest pain that persists long enough for him or her to seek hospital admission, and the ECG shows ST segment depression, the outlook is relatively poor – even when the depression is not marked ( Figs 5.25 and 5.26) and there is no rise in troponin level. These patients usually need further investigation, though on the whole they can be managed as outpatients.

Ischaemia may be precipitated by an arrhythmia, and will be resolved when either the heart rate is controlled or the arrhythmia is corrected. The ECG in Figure 5.27 shows ischaemia during atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular rate (this patient had not been treated with digoxin). The ECG in Figure 5.28 shows ischaemic ST segment depression in a patient with an AV nodal re-entry tachycardia and a ventricular rate of > 200/min.

THE ECG IN PULMONARY EMBOLISM

Most patients with a pulmonary embolus will have sinus tachycardia, but an otherwise normal ECG.

The ECG abnormalities that may occur in pulmonary embolism are those associated with right ventricular problems:

Supraventricular arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, may also occur. There is no particular sequence in which these changes develop, and they can be seen in any combination. The full ECG pattern of right ventricular hypertrophy (right axis deviation, dominant R waves in lead V1; inverted T waves in leads V1-V4, and persistent S waves in lead V6) is usually only seen in patients with long-standing thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Figures 5.30, 5.31, 5.32 and 5.33 show the records from four patients with a pulmonary embolus – but remember, in most patients the ECG is normal.

THE ECG IN OTHER CAUSES OF CHEST PAIN

PERICARDITIS

Pericarditis classically causes raised ST segments in most leads ( Fig. 5.34). This may suggest a widespread acute infarction, but in pericarditis the ST segment remains elevated and Q waves do not develop. This pattern is actually very rare: most patients with pericarditis have either a normal ECG, or a variety of nonspecific ST segment/T wave changes.

ECG PITFALLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHEST PAIN

The normal variants of the ECG have been described in Chapter 1. The important features that may cause confusion with ischaemia are:

Several abnormal ECG patterns may cause difficulty in making a diagnosis in patients with chest pain, and some of these are summarized in Table 5.1. Other causes of ‘false positives’ include benign early repolarization (see Ch. 1), left bundle branch block, the Brugada syndrome, myocarditis and pericarditis, and pulmonary embolism. ‘False negatives’ may be the result of prior myocardial infarction with persistent ST segment elevation, a permanent pacemaker, or left bundle branch block. The conditions in which the ECG can give false positive or false negative results in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction are listed in Box 5.7.

Table 5.1

ECG pitfalls in the diagnosis of chest pain

Condition ECG pattern May be confused with
Normal record Q waves in lead III but not VF
T wave inversion in leads V1-V3 (especially in black people)
Inferior infarction Anterior infarction
Left ventricular hypertrophy T wave inversion in lateral leads Ischaemia
Right ventricular hypertrophy Dominant R waves in lead V1 Inverted T waves in leads V1-V3 Posterior infarction Anterior infarction
The Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome Inverted T waves in leads V2-V5 Anterior infarction
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy T wave inversion in leads V2-V5 Anterior infarction
Subarachnoid haemorrhage T wave inversion in any leads Ischaemia
Digoxin effect Downward-sloping ST segment depression or T wave inversion, especially in leads V5-V6 Ischaemia

R WAVE CHANGES

The ECG in Figure 5.36 shows a dominant R wave in lead V1. This might be due to right ventricular hypertrophy or to a posterior infarction. Occasionally it could be a normal variant. Here, the normal axis goes against a diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy, and a review of previous ECGs from the patient showed that the dominant R wave was due to a posterior infarction.

The ECG in Figure 5.37 also shows a dominant R wave in lead V1. In a patient with chest pain, a posterior infarction might again be considered. However, the PR interval is short and there is a delta wave, so this shows the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome.

ST SEGMENT AND T WAVE CHANGES

It is, however, repolarization (T wave) changes that cause most problems. The lateral T wave inversion in the ECG in Figure 5.38 might suggest ischaemia, but again this is the WPW syndrome, in which repolarization abnormalities are common.

The anterior and lateral T wave inversion in the ECG in Figure 5.39 suggests either an NSTEMI or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This particular patient was white and asymptomatic, and had no family history of arrhythmias or any cardiac disease. There was no echocardiographic evidence of cardiomyopathy, and coronary angiography was normal. The ECG reverted to normal on exercise, and the T wave inversion and the long QT interval remained unexplained.

Differentiation between lateral ischaemia and left ventricular hypertrophy on the ECG is extremely difficult. The ECG in Figure 5.40 shows lateral T wave inversion. There are small Q waves in leads III and VF, suggesting a possible old inferior infarction, and the QRS complexes in the chest leads are not particularly tall. Nevertheless, in this patient the lateral T wave inversion was due to left ventricular hypertrophy.

The patient whose ECG is shown in Figure 5.41 had mild hypertension. The QRS complexes are tall (see Ch. 6) and there is lateral T wave inversion, suggesting left ventricular hypertrophy. However, there is also T wave inversion in leads V3 and V4, which is unusual in left ventricular hypertrophy. This patient had severe narrowing of the left main coronary artery.

Digoxin therapy causes downward-sloping ST segment depression and T wave inversion (see Ch. 7), particularly in the lateral leads, as is seen in Figure 5.42. The fact that the rhythm is atrial fibrillation with a controlled ventricular rate suggests that the patient is being treated with digoxin. However, T wave inversion in leads V3 and V4 is much more likely to be due to ischaemia, as was the case here.

An extremely common finding on the ECG is ‘nonspecific T wave flattening’ ( Fig. 5.43). When a patient is completely well and the heart is clinically normal, this is of no importance. However, in a patient with chest pain that appears to be cardiac, ‘nonspecific’ ST segment/T wave changes may indicate ischaemia.

WHAT TO DOimage

It is essential to remember that while the ECG can on occasions be extremely helpful in the diagnosis of chest pain, frequently it is not. The history, and to a lesser extent the physical examination, are far more important. Serial changes in the ECG are more important than single records.

ACUTE CHEST PAIN SUGGESTING MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The treatment of patients with chest pain differs, depending on whether the ECG shows ST segment elevation (STEMI) or not (NSTEMI). Both patient categories can be said to have an ‘acute coronary syndrome’, though this is often used as if it were synonymous with NSTEMI.

The ECG can be normal in the first few hours of the onset of a STEMI, so in order to differentiate between a STEMI and an NSTEMI it is essential that 12-lead ECGs should be repeated at least hourly until the diagnosis is clear. Blood samples should be taken immediately to identify troponin (T or I) and CK-MB levels. However, it is important to remember that the plasma troponin levels may not rise for up to 12 h, so the test should not be considered negative until 12 h after the onset of chest pain.

OTHER INVESTIGATIONS FOR PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CHEST PAIN

Chest X-rays are seldom helpful. Unless a pneumothorax or some other cause of pleurisy, or a dissecting aneurysm, seems possible the patient should not be detained waiting for an X-ray examination. Chest X-rays taken using portable equipment are rarely useful.

Echocardiography is the investigation of choice if pericarditis is suspected, because most patients will have a pericardial effusion which is easily detected. Subsequent treatment will depend on the underlying cause of the pericarditis. Possible causes are listed in Box 5.8.

Echocardiography may also help in the diagnosis of an aortic dissection, but not reliably – CT scanning is probably the investigation of choice in such cases. Echocardiography may also be helpful in suspected pulmonary embolism, because it may show right ventricular dilatation.

THE INVESTIGATION OF CHRONIC CHEST PAIN

Chronic or intermittent chest pain must be investigated and treated as the history dictates. Chronic chest pain that could be due to coronary disease is very common, and there is a long list of possible investigations, with varying accuracy of diagnosis, risk or discomfort for the patient, and cost. The ‘gold standard’ investigation might seem to be coronary angiography, but anatomical coronary disease is not necessarily the cause of a patient’s symptoms. There is no single test that fulfils all the criteria of high sensitivity and specificity, absence of risk and discomfort, and low cost.

Clinical guidelines issued by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence suggest that the key to the diagnosis of angina is the clinical assessment (NICE clinical guideline 95: Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin (2010)). Anginal pain is constricting, and radiates to the neck, jaw or arms; it is precipitated by physical exertion and it is rapidly relieved by rest or glyceryl trinitrate. The guidelines suggest that if only some of these features are present, the term ‘atypical angina’ should be used. The guidelines also suggest that if only one feature is present, the pain should be defined as ‘non-anginal’. A patient can be considered to be at high risk of having coronary artery disease (CAD) if they have diabetes and hyperlipidaemia, and are a smoker.

The percentage of people estimated to have CAD according to their age, gender, symptoms and risk factors is shown in Table 5.2.

The two essential investigations in a patient with stable and chronic chest pain are the ECG and the measurement of blood haemoglobin, to identify conditions that exacerbate angina, such as anaemia. After these, NICE guidelines suggest that if the estimated likelihood of CAD is greater than 90%, no further diagnostic tests are needed. If the likelihood of CAD is less than 10%, investigation should be aimed at causes of chest pain other than angina; or, if the symptoms are typical of angina, at causes of angina other than CAD, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or aortic stenosis.

The NICE guidelines suggest that if the likelihood of CAD is 61-90%, the first-line diagnostic investigation is invasive coronary angiography, if clinically indicated. If the likelihood of CAD is 30-60%, some form of functional imaging should be used; and if the likelihood is 10-29%, the first-line diagnostic investigation should be CT calcium scoring. CT scoring has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than exercise testing, and so it is more useful as a first test for excluding coronary disease, and thus for avoiding a further sequence of tests. When considering the use of CT calcium scoring the risks of radiation (roughly equivalent to a barium swallow) must be taken into account.

The non-invasive functional imaging tests considered in the NICE guidelines include myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS with SPECT), stress echocardiography, first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion, or MR imaging for stress-induced wall motion abnormalities. Features of these techniques, in order of common availability, are summarized in Table 5.3.

The exercise ECG is thus not regarded as a useful test for the diagnosis of angina, and the guidelines suggest that its remaining use is in the assessment of functional capacity in patients with known coronary artery disease. However, even though exercise testing is undoubtedly less sensitive and less specific than the other tests, it is still probably the most widely used investigation for chest pain, because of its advantages. Above all, it provides an opportunity to assess and judge the patient as a whole ( Box 5.9) and to see what workload they can achieve, and whether the limiting factor is chest pain or some other factor, such as joint pain or anxiety.

EXERCISE TESTING

Although any form of exercise that induces pain should produce ischaemic changes in the ECG, it is best to use a reproducible test that patients find reasonably easy to perform, and to use carefully graded increments of exercise. The use of non-standard tests means that the results may be difficult to interpret, and that repeated tests in the same patient cannot be compared meaningfully.

PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF EXERCISE TESTING

Reproducible exercise testing needs either a bicycle ergometer or a treadmill. In either case, the exercise should begin at a low level that the patient finds easy, and should be made progressively more difficult. On a bicycle, the pedal speed should be kept constant and the workload increased in steps of 25 watts. On a treadmill, both the slope and the speed can be changed and the protocol evolved by Bruce ( Table 5.4) is the one most commonly used.

The workload achieved by a patient on a treadmill is sometimes expressed as metabolic equivalents (METS). The rate at which oxygen is used by an average person at rest is 1 MET, and it equals 3.5 ml/kg/min. However, few people are average, and oxygen consumption is dependent on weight, age and gender, so METS are not particularly useful. Box 5.10 shows the estimated workloads imposed by various activities, and hence how exercise tolerance (as measured on the treadmill) indicates what a patient might be expected to achieve.

A 12-lead ECG, the heart rate and the blood pressure should be recorded at the end of each exercise period. The maximum heart rate and blood pressure are in some ways more important than the maximum workload achieved, because the latter is markedly influenced by physical fitness. However, the ECG recorded during exercise testing is unreliable in cases of:

REASONS FOR DISCONTINUING AN EXERCISE TEST

1. At the request of the patient – because of pain, breathlessness, fatigue or dizziness.

2. If the systolic blood pressure begins to fall. Normally, systolic pressure will rise progressively with increasing exercise level, but in any subject a point will be reached at which systolic pressure reaches a plateau and then starts to fall. A fall of 10 mmHg is an indication that the heart is not pumping effectively and the test should be stopped – if it is continued, the patient will become dizzy and may fall. In healthy subjects, a fall in systolic pressure is seen only at high workloads, but in patients with severe heart disease the systolic pressure may fail to rise on exercise. The amount of exercise the patient can carry out before the systolic pressure falls is thus a useful indicator of the severity of any heart disease.

3. It is conventional to discontinue the test if the heart rate increases to 80% of the predicted maximum for the patient’s age. This maximum can be calculated in beats/min by subtracting the patient’s age in years from 220. Patients with severe heart disease will usually fail to attain 80% of their predicted maximum heart rate, and the peak rate is another useful indicator of the state of the patient’s heart. It is, of course, important to take note of any treatment the patient may be receiving, because a beta-blocker will prevent the normal increase in heart rate.

4. Exercise should be discontinued immediately if an arrhythmia occurs. Many patients will have ventricular extrasystoles during exercise. These can be ignored unless their frequency begins to rise, or a couplet of extrasystoles occurs.

5. The test should be stopped if the ST segment in any lead becomes depressed by 4 mm. Horizontal depression of 2 mm in any lead is usually taken as indicating that a diagnosis of ischaemia can be made (a ‘positive’ test), and if the aim of the test is to confirm or refute a diagnosis of angina there is no point in continuing once this has occurred. It may, however, be useful to find out just how much a patient can do, and if this is the aim of the test it is not unreasonable to continue, if the patient’s symptoms are not severe.

INTERPRETATION OF ECG CHANGES DURING EXERCISE TESTING

The final report of the test should indicate the duration of exercise, the workload achieved, the maximum heart rate and systolic pressure, the reason for discontinuing the test, and a description of any arrhythmias or ST segment changes.

An exercise test is usually considered ‘positive’ for ischaemia if horizontal or downward-sloping ST segment depression of 2 mm or more develops during exercise, and resolves on resting. By convention, ST segment depression is measured relative to the ECG baseline (between the T and P waves) 60–80 ms after the J point (the point of inflection at the junction of the S wave and the ST segment). A diagnosis of ischaemia becomes almost certain if these changes are accompanied by the appearance and then disappearance of angina. Figures 5.44 and 5.45 show an ECG that was normal when the patient was at rest, but which demonstrated clear ischaemia during exercise. Box 5.11 lists the normal changes in the ECG during exercise, and Box 5.12 lists the changes suggesting a high probability of coronary disease.

There are, however, other ECG changes that may be seen during an exercise test. Figures 5.46 and 5.47 show the records of tests in a patient who had had an anterior myocardial infarction some weeks previously. At rest, some ST segment elevation persisted in the anterior leads. During exercise the ST elevation became more marked. The reasons for this are uncertain. It has been suggested that the change is due to the development of an abnormality of left ventricular contraction, but other evidence suggests that it is simply another ECG manifestation of ischaemia. There is, however, no doubt that this is an abnormal result.

When the resting ECG shows T wave inversion and on exercise the T waves become upright, this is called ‘pseudonormalization’, and it is a sign of ischaemia ( Fig. 5.48).

When the J point and the ST segment become depressed during exercise, but the ST segment slopes upwards, the change is not an indication of ischaemia ( Figs 5.49 and 5.50). Deciding whether ST segment depression slopes upwards or is horizontal can be quite difficult.

False positive changes also occur when exercise testing is performed in patients taking digoxin. Figures 5.51 and 5.52 show the results of an exercise test in a patient being treated with digoxin, whose coronary angiogram was normal.

In a patient suspected of having coronary disease, exercise testing gives the ‘right’ answer in about 75% of patients tested – to be more precise, exercise testing has a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 77%. All tests at times give false positive and false negative results, reflecting their specificity and sensitivity, and false positive tests are particularly common in middle-aged women. In an asymptomatic subject in whom the likelihood of coronary disease is low, the chance of a false positive result may be higher than the chance of a true positive. Also, the greater the likelihood that the patient has coronary disease, the more likely it is that a positive test is ‘true’ rather than ‘false’. The statistics (Bayes’ theorem) may seem complex, but the important thing is to remember that exercise testing is not infallible.

Some patients who give a history characteristic of angina, and who have an undoubtedly positive exercise test according to their ECG, have normal coronary arteries. This condition is called ‘Cardiac Syndrome X’. In some cases the patient has structural heart disease (e.g. left ventricular hypertrophy, mitral valve prolapse, myocardial bridging), but most patients have an apparently normal heart and the cause of Cardiac Syndrome X is unknown.

Exercise testing thus has to be used and interpreted with care.

RISKS OF EXERCISE TESTING

Exercise testing involves a risk of about 1 in 5000 of the development of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, and a risk of about 1 in 10000 tests of myocardial infarction or death. There is also a risk of injury if the patient falls, or jumps, off the treadmill. Box 5.13 lists some contraindications of exercise testing.

The ECGs in Figures 5.53, 5.54 and 5.55 are from a patient whose resting ECG was normal, but as the test proceeded he began to develop ventricular extra-systoles and then suddenly developed ventricular fibrillation. This demonstrates the need for full resuscitation facilities to be available at the time of exercise testing.

MANAGEMENT OF CHEST PAIN

NSTEMI

Patients with NSTEMI should be treated immediately with aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, clopidogrel, a beta-blocker (provided there are no contraindications), a statin and nitrates.

Two risk categories of NSTEMI can be identified, which require different subsequent treatments. Patients at high risk have any of:

In addition to the baseline treatment above, these patients require an infusion of a glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa inhibitor followed by coronary angiography before discharge from hospital. Angiography is urgent in unstable patients. Most high-risk patients will need angioplasty or bypass surgery, often as a matter of urgency.

Low-risk patients include those with all of:

Heparin can be discontinued but aspirin, beta-blockers, nitrates, a statin and clopidogrel are continued. As soon as possible, an exercise or another non-invasive test should be performed to assess the probability and severity of coronary disease. On the basis of the test results and the clinical picture, a decision can be made about the need for, and urgency of, coronary angiography.

CHRONIC CHEST PAIN

A trial of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate 0.5 mg may help make the diagnosis of angina, and in such cases patients should then be encouraged to use the drug liberally and prophylactically. Beta-blockers are the first-line agents for preventing angina. If the patient is unable to take a beta-blocker (e.g. because of asthma), treatment should start with a calcium-channel blocker such as amlodipine. Nicorandil and ivabradine may also be useful, especially in patients intolerant of other drugs. All these drugs can be combined, or a long-acting nitrate such as isosorbide mononitrate can be substituted for one of these classes of drug. A combination of two of these drug classes is sometimes helpful; the addition of the third seldom provides much further benefit. Secondary prophylactic measures, including aspirin and a statin, are essential.

Otherwise, treatment will depend on the cause of the chest pain. If investigation (see above) reveals that the cause is cardiac, and despite maximum medical therapy the patient remains symptomatic, invasive procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty may need to be considered.