The Ear

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2073 times

Chapter 5 The Ear

A. External Ear

6 What is the auricle (or pinna)?

It is the part of the external ear that is outside the canal (Fig. 5-1). Made of cartilage and skin, it is highly flexible.

image

Figure 5-1 Anatomy of the external auditory meatus.

(From Granger N: Crash Course Anatomy. St. Louis, Mosby, 2007.)

7 What are auricular bumps? What causes them?

Auricular papules or nodules are common. Most are benign, but some represent early neoplasms or clues to underlying systemic disorders. Specific etiologies include:

image Darwin’s tubercle (Fig. 5-2): Benign and congenital nodule near the auricular apex (on the helix, at the junction of upper and middle thirds). Nontender and rarely bilateral, it was first described by the British sculptor Thomas Woolner, a founding member of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and a spare-time anatomist. Woolner depicted it in his statue of “Puck,” and Charles Darwin was so impressed that he named it the Woolnerian tip. It is an atavistic feature (i.e., a trait typical of our mammalian ancestors—more specifically, monkeys).

image Keloids (Fig. 5-3): Smooth and flesh-colored papule(s) on one or both sides of the earlobe. They indicate an exuberant and fibrotic response to injury.

image Tophi: One or more nontender nodules on the auricular edges. They are named after the Latin tufa (a calcareous and volcanic deposit) and may indeed be mildly hard. They can occur on both helix and antihelix, and usually indicate hyperuricemia and gout.

image Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis (CNH): This is a common, benign, and painful condition of the most prominent projection of the ear, usually the apex of the helix, but it also may affect the antihelix. It is typical of the right ear of middle-aged to older men, usually fair-skinned individuals with cutaneous sun-damage. In 10–35% of cases, it may also affect women. It is rather common (in a series, the most frequent external ear condition seen in an ear-nose-throat clinic) and is probably due to prolonged and excessive pressure, leading to inflammation, edema, and ischemic necrosis. This eventually degenerates into secondary perichondritis due to the vascular characteristics of the ear. Onset may be precipitated by pressure, trauma, or cold. Sleeping on the affected side is also common. The nodule appears spontaneously and painfully, rapidly enlarging to a maximum size of 4–8   mm, after which it remains stable. It is firm, tender, skin-colored, sharply demarcated, and round to oval in shape. The edge is usually raised, with a central ulcer or crust. It is not associated with systemic disorders.

image

Figure 5-2 Darwin’s tubercle (left) and tophi (right).

(From Seidel HM, Ball JW, Daims JE, Benedict GW: Mosby’s Guide to Physical Examination, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1995.)

image

Figure 5-3 Keloids of the earlobe.

(From Fitzpatrick JE, Aeling H: Dermatology Secrets. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1996.)

22 What is a tender and swollen auricle?

It is an uncommon but dramatic event. A diffusely swollen auricle is usually due to:

image Trauma: Easily identifiably by a history of recent altercation, especially if supported by other evidence of trauma, like a broken nose or a black eye. In fact, a “cauliflower” ear auricle is a time-honored occupational hazard of boxers, first portrayed in a beautiful Hellenistic statue of a resting fighter (Fig. 5-4). Unless evacuated, auricular hematomas heal with fibrosis and deformity and may even result in hearing loss. For instance, it has been suggested that Edison’s deafness was the result of having been picked up by the ears as a child. Still, there is no evidence that he had a cauliflower ear. President Johnson, on the other hand, contributed to our advance in veterinary medicine by demonstrating that cauliflower ears do not occur in dogs, especially beagles. In fact, he used to pick up his pooch by the ears and then toss him around in front of the press corps. LBJ, however, had no ear problems we know of, with the possible exception of selective deafness to war protesters in nearby Lafayette Park.

image Relapsing polychondritis: May affect all facial cartilages, including the alar of the nose and the auricular of the ear(s).

image Otitis externa maligna (see question 12).

24 Why should one inspect (and palpate) the postauricular space?

To rule out mastoiditis in patients complaining of earache. In this case, there will be exquisite tenderness in the 1 -cm crescent-shaped depression immediately behind the external auditory canal (and also on the mastoid tip, see question 16). In addition, there may be (1) a palpable posterior auricular node (presenting as a nodule in the area of the mastoid process); and (2) a positive Battle’s sign (ecchymosis over the mastoid, most often due to trauma and indicative of basilar skull fracture).

27 Can I diagnose coronary artery disease by looking at the auricle?

Maybe. Earlobe creases in adults are an acquired phenomenon and thus different from the folds occasionally present in normal children or the congenital creases of newborns with Beckwith syndrome (gigantism, macroglossia, and umbilical abnormalities in a setting of hepatosplenomegaly, renal hyperplasia, and microcephaly). Still, the possible association between diagonal earlobe fissures and coronary artery disease was indeed described by the American Sanders T. Frank and then reported in the 1990s by William J. Elliott. In an 8-year study of 108 patients, Dr. Elliott found greater cardiac mortality rates in patients with a crease in at least one earlobe and suggested that loss of elastin could explain both crease(s) and arteriosclerosis. In a follow-up study of 1000 patients admitted to a medical service, he found that 74% of those with a crease had coronary artery disease as compared to 16% of the creaseless ones. Since then, more than 30 studies have found, with a few exceptions, similar results. Overall, except for Asians and Native Americans, creases appear to be a significant independent variable for coronary artery disease. They are associated with higher rates of cardiac events in patients hospitalized for suspected ischemia and are also significantly correlated with male gender, cigarette smoking, cardiac familiarity, hypertension, and age. In fact, some authors have suggested that skin creases and heart disease might simply share an equally higher prevalence in older subjects without being pathogenetically associated. Hence, the jury is still out on the subject. A related but even more interesting sign is hair in the canal, which also seems to be associated with coronary artery disease in retrospect, without any relationship to its pathogenesis.

C. Otoscopic Examination

38 What does the normal tympanic membrane look like?

As pale, gray, translucent, and surrounded by a ring (anulus in Latin). Always inspect it carefully, since this may be the site of tiny perforations. The normal tympanic membrane also includes visible projections of the malleus (hammer in Latin), the largest of the three auditory ossicles, and actually more of a “club” than a hammer. It comprises a head (caput), a neck (collum), and a handle (manubrium) (Fig. 5-5). From the base of the manubrium arises the short lateral process. The manubrium and lateral process are attached firmly to the tympanic membrane, with the lateral process projecting anteriorly and superiorly. The head articulates instead with a saddle-shaped surface on the body of the incus. Otoscopically the only visualized structures are (1) the short lateral process and the manubrium; (2) the umbo of the malleus (from the Latin umbo, boss of a shield, knob), which coincides with the head of the hammer and presents as an inferior and posterior projection through the tympanic membrane; (3) a reflective triangular cone of light, located inferiorly and anteriorly to the umbo; (4) the flaccid portion of the tympanic membrane (pars flaccida), located anteriorly and superiorly to the manubrium; and (5) the pars tensa, which is located just posteriorly to the manubrium. “Flaccida” and “tensa” reflect, respectively, areas of greater or lesser mobility of the tympanic membrane.

image

Figure 5-5 Anatomy of normal tympanic membranes.

(From Epstein O, Perkin GD, de Bono DP, Cookson J: Clinical Examination, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1997.)

F. Bedside Hearing Tests

Selected Bibliography

1 Arbit E. A sensitive bedside hearing test. Ann Neurol. 1977;2:250-251.

2 Brady PM, Zive MA, Goldberg RJ, et al. A new wrinkle to the earlobe crease. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:65-66.

3 British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning-fork tests. Br J Audiol. 1987;21:229-230.

4 Browning GG, Swan IRC. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test. Br Med J. 1988;1297:1381-1382.

5 Burkey JM, Lippy WH, Schuring AG, et al. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. Am J Otol. 1998;19:59-62.

6 Chole RA, Cook GB. The Rinne test for conductive deafness: A critical reappraisal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114:399-403.

7 Crowley H, Kaufman RS. The Rinne tuning fork test. Arch Otolaryngol. 1966;84:70-72.

8 Doyle PJ, Anderson DW, Pijl S. The tuning fork—An essential instrument in otologic practice. J Otolaryngol. 1984;13:83-86.

9 Eekhof JA, de Bock GH, de Laat JA, et al. The whispered voice: The best test for screening for hearing impairment in general practice? Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:473-474.

10 Elliot WJ. Ear lobe crease and coronary artery disease. Am J Med. 1983;75:1024-1032.

11 Frank STM. Aural sign of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:327-328.

12 Gelfand SA. Clinical precision of the Rinne test. Acta Otorinolaryngol. 1977;83:480-487.

13 Golabek W, Stephens SDG. Some tuning fork tests revisited. Clin Otolaryngol. 1979;4:421-430.

14 Huizing E. The early description of the so-called tuning fork tests of Weber and Rinne: I. The “Weber test” and its first description by Schmalz. Otolaryngol Rel Spec. 1973;35:278-282.

15 Jacob V, Alexander P, Nalinesha KM, et al. Can Rinne’s test quantify hearing loss? ENT J. 1993;72:152-153.

16 Johnson EW. Tuning forks to audiometers and back again. Lanryngoscope. 1970;80:49-68.

17 Johnston DE. A new modification of the Rinne test. Clin Otolaryngol. 1992;17:322-326.

18 Lichtenstein M, Bess FN, Logan SA. Validation and screening tools for identifying hearing-impaired elderly in primary care. JAMA. 1988;259:2875-2878.

19 Macphee GJ, Crowther JA, McAlpine CH. A simple screening test for hearing impairment in elderly patients. Age Ageing. 1988;17:347-351.

20 Nadol JB. Hearing loss. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1092-1102.

21 Ng M, Tackler RK. Early history of tuning fork tests. Am J Otolaryngol. 1993;14:100-105.

22 Samuel J, Eitelberg G, Habi JI. Tuning forks: The problem of striking. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:1-6.

23 Sheehy JL, Gardner C, Hambley WM. Tuning fork tests in modern otology. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;94:132-138.

24 Stankiewicz JA, Mowry HJ. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests. Laryngoscope. 1979;89:1956-1973.

25 Swan IRC, Browning GB. The whispered voice as a screening test for hearing impairment. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35:197.

26 Wilson WR, Woods LA. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests. Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101:81-85.