The Arthritides

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2553 times

Chapter 14 The Arthritides

Disorders of the joints are common and may cause considerable pain and disability. They are frequently classified as noninflammatory, inflammatory, or infectious. This chapter reviews the more common joint affections.

The Synovium

A synovial lining encloses the joint space of all diarthrodial joints. This membrane is also present in bursae and tendon sheaths. It is normally one to three cells thick and is constructed of multiple villi. It reflects not only local disturbances but also systemic disease, and is responsible for the production of joint fluid.

Synovial fluid is a clear, slightly yellow liquid that is present only in small amounts in the normal joint. Its main functions are those of lubrication and nutrition. Its characteristic viscosity is due to the presence of high concentrations of hyaluronic acid, which is produced by the synovial lining cells. This mucopolysaccharide also contributes a portion of the matrix of the synovial lining and is partially responsible for the filtering properties of the synovium.

Joint fluid is a dialysate of blood plasma; that is, crystalloids are present, but colloids are not. Normal joint fluid does not clot because many of the coagulation factors are absent. Glucose is present in concentrations 10 mg/dL lower than serum. This difference increases to 30 mg/dL in rheumatoid and other inflammatory types of arthritis and may approach 70 mg/dL in infectious arthritis. Normal fluid also contains complement, lipids, and proteins in amounts much lower than the serum level. The white blood cell (WBC) count is usually less than 200/mm3, with the majority being mononuclear. Inflammation increases the cell count and the percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

A great deal of information can be obtained from the examination of a joint aspirate (Table 14-1). However, this examination is not indicated in every joint effusion and should be limited to those diagnostic problems that are not secondary to trauma. (Usually, the two disorders of most concern are infection and crystalline arthritis.) The joint is usually aspirated from the extensor side under sterile conditions. Three test tubes are sufficient for most determinations: (1) a plain tube for gross examination, clotting, and a mucin clot test; (2) one ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid–treated tube for cell and crystal analysis; and (3) one heparinized tube for bacteriologic study. Five milliliters of fluid are placed in each tube.

A quick bedside assessment of the fluid can be made before the more extensive laboratory analysis. The color and clarity of the sample are estimated by merely observing the fluid in the syringe. The viscosity can be roughly determined by the thread test. A drop of the fluid is placed between the apposed thumb and index finger. The fingers are gradually spread apart, and the length of the thread the fluid forms before it breaks is measured. Normal and osteoarthritic fluid may “string” out 2.5 to 5 cm before breaking, but the dilute fluid of inflammation strings very little.

Osteoarthritis

The most common type of noninflammatory arthritis is degenerative arthritis, or osteoarthritis. This condition is characterized by articular cartilage deterioration and bony overgrowth of the joint surface. Two forms are usually recognized: primary (idiopathic) and secondary. The primary form may be localized or generalized. The cause is unknown, but it is strongly correlated with age. The hip and knee joints are most often affected in the primary localized form. Secondary osteoarthritis may result from a number of disorders including trauma (commonly fractures or severe ligament injuries), metabolic conditions, and other forms of arthritis such as rheumatoid and gouty arthritis. Pathologically, the cartilage loses its normal glistening appearance and becomes roughened and irregular. Eventually, the cartilage becomes completely worn away, thus exposing the subchondral bone. Secondary synovitis and osteophyte formation are common. The clinical course is variable. For some patients, the disorder is slowly progressive, but for many others, the condition can be stabilized with conservative treatment.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Pain is the most common initial symptom. This frequently occurs with motion or activity and is relieved by rest. The source of discomfort is unknown. It may result from chemical mediators and possibly mechanical factors. Joint stiffness typically occurs with rest and improves with activity. The physical findings include crepitus, joint line tenderness, swelling, restriction of motion, and joint enlargement from osteophyte formation. In the hands, these osteophytic overgrowths are termed Heberden’s nodes when they are present at the distal interphalangeal joint and Bouchard’s nodes when they occur at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Pain is usually present on joint motion. Disuse atrophy of the adjacent musculature may develop rapidly, thus increasing the disability and pain. Even though osteoarthritis is not considered an “inflammatory” disease, mild increased temperature with palpable heat is often present. This can be appreciated clinically in a superficial joint (such as the knee) by placing one hand on the front of each knee of the sitting patient and then switching the hands back and forth. Subtle differences in temperature suggestive of synovitis (which indicates an intraarticular problem) may become more apparent. This clinical test is often helpful in the obese patient in whom an effusion may be difficult to visualize.

The roentgenographic findings consist of joint space narrowing, spur formation, sclerosis, and subchondral cyst formation (Fig. 14-1). The laboratory findings and synovial analysis are normal, except for occasional flakes of cartilage in the joint fluid. In most cases, a routine physical examination and plain films are sufficient to establish the diagnosis. More extensive radiographic testing is usually not indicated except in those cases in which the diagnosis is uncertain.

TREATMENT

The main objectives of treatment are the relief of pain and prevention of progression. As with any joint disorder, the patient should not be told that arthritis is present unless the physical and laboratory findings are consistent with the diagnosis. The stigma of “arthritis” should not be attached to any condition merely to explain vague or nonspecific symptoms. However, once the diagnosis is established, the patient should be made to realize that while miracles cannot be expected, there is almost always something that can be done to relieve the pain and deformity, regardless of the cause. Treatment for osteoarthritis begins with rest of the involved joint. Weight loss and the use of assistive devices for ambulation (cane or crutch) lessen the pressure on the involved lower extremity. Removable splints or braces are also recommended.

Stretching exercises are helpful, and the joint should be passed through a full range of motion several times daily to reduce joint stiffness. The local application of moist heat often relieves discomfort during the acute painful stage and may be especially helpful before exercise. Exercises designed to combat stiffness and restore muscle strength are important, because the weakness contributes to joint instability and disability. The patient may benefit from a short course of formal physical therapy to develop a good home exercise program. All exercise should be low impact. Aquatic exercise programs are generally well tolerated. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are traditionally used for osteoarthritis, but may be no more effective than acetominophen for pain relief because the role of inflammation in the condition is uncertain. Mild analgesics may even be indicated on an occasional basis. Intraarticular cortisone injections are often very effective for pain relief. Their effect is usually only temporary, but the benefit may last several months. The injections can be repeated several times per year. Any recommended limits to the number of injections a patient may have per year appears to be arbitrary, although most patients seem to do well with three or four injections per year. Various liniments may be used for their counterirritant effect. Viscosupplementation (a series of joint injections using a hyaluronate-like material) has been tried, but the results are inconclusive. The efficacy of supplements such as chondroitin and glucosamine has not been well proven.

Orthopedic referral is indicated when there is no response to medical management. The most common surgical procedures are arthrodesis and arthroplasty (Fig. 14-2). Each is effective in eliminating the painful articulation. Realignment of faulty weight-bearing joints by osteotomy may also be beneficial.

GOUT

Primary gouty arthritis is an inherited metabolic disease characterized by a disturbance of purine metabolism in which crystals of sodium urate are deposited in various soft tissues, primarily the joints, synovium of tendons, and the kidneys. The crystals and the resultant symptoms occur as a result of an increase in the serum uric acid (SUA), a normal end product of purine metabolism. Hyperuricemia and gout can develop from excessive uric acid production, decreased renal excretion of uric acid, or both.

The majority of patients with gout are men in their third and fourth decades of life, and the incidence increases with age. The disorder is less common in women and rare before menopause. After menopause, SUA levels in women approach those in men. Obesity, chronic exposure to lead, excessive alcohol intake, hypertension, and the management of hypertension with diuretics appear to be some of the risk factors involved in its development. Secondary gout may also follow hyperuricemia from many causes, including leukemia, hemolytic anemia, and other blood dyscrasias.

CLINICAL FEATURES

The initial acute attack is usually of sudden onset and occurs in a single joint or area of tenosynovium of the lower extremity (Table 14-2). The metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the great toe is classically the first site of involvement (podagra), although any joint or area of tenosynovium can be involved. The extensor synovium on the dorsum of the midfoot is another common site of acute attack, as is the knee joint (gonagra). In 80% to 90% of cases, the lower extremity is involved. The older patient with gout is more likely to have involvement of the fingers and to develop tophi. Older women may present with polyarticular disease, often involving atypical locations. The pain and inflammation are usually severe and may be precipitated by exercise, dietary indiscretion, and physical or emotional stress. Attacks are common after illness or shortly after surgery, and they typically begin at night. Swelling, heat, redness, and other signs of inflammation are usually present. The physical findings may even simulate cellulitis or infectious arthritis. The area is often tender to even the slightest touch. Fever, tachycardia, and other constitutional symptoms may accompany the attack. The initial episode may be followed later by polyarticular involvement. Eventually, deposits of urate crystals, termed tophi, may form in the subcutaneous tissue.

Table 14-2 Joint Swelling—Differential Diagnosis*

Disorder Symptoms/History Findings
Pyogenic arthritis Usually painful but sometimes low grade. Fever, acute onset. Usually monoarticular. Febrile, increased heat, painful movement. Systemic signs of illness. Joint fluid positive for bacteria.
Gouty arthritis Knee, great toe, or generalized foot pain. Symptoms may be initiated by physical stress such as surgery. May be extremely painful but usually low grade. Usually monoarticular. Previous episodes? Redness, increased heat. Crystals in joint fluid. Elevated serum uric acid. Fluid often cloudy.
Osteoarthritis Chronic, gradual. Monoarticular. May have history of mechanical injury. Stiffness after rest, pain after prolonged activity Restricted movement but pain usually only at the extremes of movement. Fluid is clear, only excessive amounts.
Pseudogout Middle age to elderly. Usually monoarticular. Previous episodes? Crystals in cloudy fluid (calcium pyrophosphate).
Rheumatoid arthritis Multiple joints may be involved. Females most commonly affected. Usually subacute or insidous in onset but occasionally acute. Often symmetric. Metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal joints usually involved. Subcutaneous nodules in late cases. Laboratory studies may show positive rheumatoid test and increased ESR.
Others History may reflect skin rash or other skin changes. Note other system involvement (complete history, especially GI, and pulmonary system). FANA, ESR may be abnormal. Many collagen disorders have polyarticular symptoms and act like rheumatoid arthritis.

ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FANA, flurorescent antinuclear antibody; GI, gastrointestinal.

* NOTES: The workup should include aspiration of joint fluid. Fluid is observed for color, and the string test is performed. The fluid is analyzed for cell count, Gram stain, crystal analysis, and culture and sensitivity. The blood work should include complete blood cell count, uric acid, blood cultures if indicated, sedimentation rate, fluorescent antinuclear antibody, and rheumatoid factor. Blood cultures should include aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Roentgenographic evaluation is always performed to evaluate for osteoarthritis and calcific changes in soft tissues.

Early in the disease, roentgenogram findings are normal. Later, erosive changes appear that have a characteristic punched-out appearance (Fig. 14-3). Destruction and degeneration of the articular cartilage frequently follow.

The standard for the definitive diagnosis of gout requires crystal identification on joint aspirate, although a presumptive diagnosis is often established on clinical grounds, especially if associated with hyperuricemia. Laboratory findings include a mild leukocytosis, elevated sedimentation rate, and hyperuricemia, although acute attacks are occasionally associated with a normal level of uric acid. In some patients, the SUA level may decrease into the normal range during an acute attack. Uric acid levels are best checked again after the attack is over. The synovial aspirate is usually cloudy and mildly inflammatory in nature. Because acute gout and infectious arthritis can present identically, the fluid should also be tested for infection. Urate crystals are usually demonstrable. They are needle shaped and negatively birefringent (shine brightly) under polarized light. A 24-hour urinary collection for uric acid may be helpful in determining the appropriate treatment.

TREATMENT

The treatment of gout depends on the stage of the disease. The objectives in management are to terminate or prevent the acute attack, encourage mobilization of tophaceous deposits, and reduce the level of SUA.

Prevention of acute attacks depends on modification of diet and lifestyle. Obese patients should be counseled regarding weight loss, and alcohol intake should be kept moderate (no more than two drinks per day). Hypertension and its management require careful assessment, and nondiuretic drugs may be needed.

Although hyperuricemia is central to gout, it does not always lead to arthritis, and there is no indication to treat asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Most patients with hyperuricemia do not have gout, and fewer than half of those with hyperuricemia will ever develop gout. Thus, the pharmacologic treatment of hyperuricemia can probably be delayed until the patient actually develops symptoms.

Treatment of the acute attack usually involves the use of generic NSAIDs, which have generally replaced colchicine in the management of the acute gout. Colchicine is an alkaloid found in the meadow saffron or autumn crocus. It has been used for gout for 1500 years and is still used on occasion. (Two 0.5-mg tablets are given initially, followed by one tablet every hour, up to 12 tablets, until the symptoms subside or diarrhea ensues.) Disappearance of symptoms with colchicine helps confirm the diagnosis, but its dosing is inconvenient, and the gastrointestinal (GI) side effects can be severe. Intravenous colchicine has been used, but there are some recent reports of serious side effects. Quick-acting drugs such as ibuprofen and indomethacin are often recommended, although most of the NSAIDs are effective. Indomethacin is especially helpful in the young but is poorly tolerated in the elderly. Aspirin may not be as useful. For those who are intolerant of NSAIDs (GI symptoms or renal insufficiency), corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone can be used. The side effects of steroid use can be minimized by tapering the dose as soon as possible. When oral medication cannot be given (in postoperative patients, for example), intraarticular cortisone injections are valuable. The medical management of the acute attack is accompanied by rest, elevation, moist heat, and narcotics as needed. Full resolution of symptoms may take several days.

The main indication for prophylaxis is frequent (≥3 per year) attacks of gouty joint inflammation. A single attack, or perhaps even two, probably does not warrant prophylaxis, but for protection from further attacks, one of two agents, probenecid or allopurinol, is commonly used. The goal is to reverse the process by lowering the SUA level to below the level at which urate saturates the extracellular fluid (ECF) and to eliminate the excess urate that has accumulated as tophi. This requires that the SUA level be lowered below 6.0 mg/dL. Probenecid is a uricosuric agent; that is, it increases the renal excretion of uric acid and is indicated for hypoexcretors if renal function is normal. It should not be used in the presence of renal insufficiency, which is common in the elderly. Probenecid is also effective in reducing the size of the tophaceous deposits. Allopurinol is a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that prevents the formation of uric acid from xanthine and hypoxanthine. It is especially valuable in the patient who forms urate stones because it directly decreases the production of uric acid. Although rarely required, the 24-hour urine collection may give direction in deciding which agent to use. (Hypoexcretors are given probenecid to block absorption, and overproducers are given allopurinol.) High excretors are not good candidates for probenecid because it could increase the risk of renal stones. Regardless of the etiology of the uric acid elevation, the most popular drug used is allopurinol, mainly because of its efficacy and its convenient once-a-day dosing schedule. As a rule, the start of uric acid–lowering drugs should be delayed for 2 weeks after an acute attack because this intervention may prolong the attack or even precipitate a new one. NOTE: NSAIDs alone are even used by some for long-term prophylaxis.

Surgery is usually limited to excision of large tophi and, occasionally, arthroplasty.

Pseudogout (Chondrocalcinosis)

Pseudogout is one of the clinical patterns associated with a crystal-induced synovitis of unknown etiology resulting from the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystals in joint hyaline and fibrocartilage. The crystal deposition is termed chondrocalcinosis. It is also called calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease (CPDD). The condition can also be caused by hydroxyapatite and basic calcium phosphate (BCP) crystals. The prevalence is uncertain but is probably similar to gout (3/1000 individuals). Chondrocalcinosis is present in more than 20% of all people age 80, but most are asymptomatic. The condition resembles gout in its clinical manifestations, except that large rather than small joints are more commonly involved.

CLINICAL FEATURES

The clinical presentation is variable, but the symptoms are similar to those of chronic gouty arthritis. The age of onset is 60 to 70 years. Intermittent acute episodes occur, but the joint most commonly involved is the knee rather than the great toe. The attacks are usually monoarticular. The condition is frequently familial and is occasionally associated with diabetes, renal disease, and other systemic conditions. Like gout, acute attacks may be triggered by a variety of surgical or medical events. In addition to the goutlike symptoms, calcification of the cartilage of the knee, especially the meniscus, is common (Fig. 14-4). Calcification of the anulus fibrosus, radioulnar disc, and symphysis pubis may also be seen. Stippled calcification in bands running parallel to the subchondral bone margins may be present. Synovial fluid analysis reveals typical rhomboid-shape crystals that exhibit weakly positive birefringence under polarized light. There are no specific changes in blood or urine. The American Rheumatism Association criteria are often used for diagnosis:

Categories: pseudogout is definitely present if criteria I or II(a) plus (b) are present, probably if II(a) or (b) is fulfilled, and possibly if III(a) or (b) is present.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic disorder characterized by chronic erosive synovitis. In contrast to many of the other arthritides, it is a potentially crippling disease. The condition is three times more common in women, and the peak incidence is between the ages of 25 and 45 years. Female hormones may play a role in its pathogenesis, although many factors could be involved, including genetic ones. In women, the onset of symptoms is often in the early postpartum period, a common time for the first presentation of autoimmune diseases.

The etiology of the disorder is unknown, although it is most likely an immune response to some antigen, possibly viral. The result is the activation, by some unknown mechanism, of proinflammatory cells that infiltrate the synovium. These cells, in turn, release various substances such as cytokines and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which subsequently cause the pathologic changes typical to this group of diseases. Pathologically, the synovium becomes thickened, inflamed, and hypertrophic. An aggressive, infiltrating granulation tissue from the synovium (pannus) typically spreads over the joint cartilage. Eventually, erosion and destruction of the articular surface result from the chronic inflammatory process.

CLINICAL FEATURES

The onset is usually gradual although acute cases may occur. Weakness, fatigue, and anorexia are common prodromal symptoms. Eventually, joint involvement becomes apparent, with stiffness, swelling, heat, and redness. Stiffness is most pronounced in the morning because of the “gelling” effect of the excess fluid. Most cases initially present with multiple symmetric joint involvement, most often in the hands and feet (Table 14-3). The MCP, metatarsophalangeal (MTP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints are usually involved, but the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints are not. Eventually, most of the major joints become involved as well. Remissions and exacerbations are common, but the condition is chronically progressive in the majority of cases. The disease shortens life expectancy from 10 to 15 years.

Table 14-3 American Rheumatology Revised Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis (American College of Rheumatology)

Rheumatoid arthritis is said to exist when four of the following seven conditions are present:
(Criteria 1–4 must be present for at least 6 weeks.)

The physical signs are caused by the inflammation of the synovial membrane. Joint effusions, warmth, tenderness, and restriction of motion are usually present early in the disease. Eventually, characteristic deformities appear that consist of subluxations, dislocations, and joint contractures.

In addition to the joint manifestations, extraarticular findings are common. Tendon sheaths and bursae are frequently affected by the chronic inflammation. Tendon rupture may even occur, especially in the hand and often involving the finger extensors. Involvement of synovial bursae may lead to considerable enlargement, especially the Baker’s cyst, which often reaches enormous size. Rupture of this cyst is not uncommon and may lead to a local reaction in the calf, simulating thrombophlebitis. Subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules develop in 25% of cases and are most common over bony prominences such as the elbow and shaft of the ulna. Chronic flexor tenosynovitis may eventually lead to carpal tunnel syndrome in many cases.

Involvement of other organ systems may lead to pulmonary fibrosis, pericarditis, and vasculitis as well as Felty and Sjogren syndromes.

The roentgenogram usually reveals soft tissue swelling and osteoporosis early in the disease. Eventually, joint space narrowing, erosion, and deformity become visible as the result of continued inflammation and cartilage destruction (Fig. 14-5).

The laboratory findings consist of a mild anemia, leukocytosis, and elevated sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels. The rheumatoid factor is positive in approximately 75% of cases. The joint fluid is usually turbid and forms a poor mucin clot. The cell count is elevated, with an increase in polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

TREATMENT

Proper management requires close cooperation among primary physician, therapist, rheumatologist, and orthopedist. Early referral to a rheumatologist is especially important because evidence exists that outcomes are improved with early, aggressive medical management. The goals are to maintain function and to halt the irreversible damage that may become visible radiographically. Patient education is of utmost importance. (Information from the physician can be supplemented from outside sources, such as the Arthritis Foundation.) Rest is beneficial in reducing inflammation. When combined with an exercise program, moist heat, and splinting, joint deformities can frequently be prevented or corrected.

Pharmacologic management is beyond the scope of this text, but four types of drugs are commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis: NSAIDs, corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, including biologic agents), and analgesics. NSAIDs are commonly used as the initial treatment to relieve inflammation. Aspirin remains the drug often used for many patients although other NSAIDs are also popular. Unfortunately, GI side effects are common, and there are concerns that these drugs actually may not alter the course of the disease. DMARDs such as gold and methotrexate are used when the other drugs begin to lose their effectiveness. These are usually slow acting and may require several weeks to become effective. The biologic response modifiers (BMRs) are the newest therapeutic agents to be used in rheumatoid diseases and may offer the best chance to directly target those substances such as tumor necrosis factor that are responsible for the profound inflammatory changes seen in rheumatoid arthritis. These drugs represent one of the most important advances in the treatment of inflammatory joint diseases. Oral and intraarticular steroids are helpful as well, although it is hoped that as other, more specific drugs continue to be developed, reliance on corticosteroids will diminish.

Among the surgical procedures that are commonly used are synovectomy, soft tissue releases, arthroplasty, and arthrodesis. The soft tissue procedures are most beneficial early in the disease before significant fixed deformity or subluxation appears.

JUVENILE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (STILL’S DISEASE)

The rheumatoid arthritis that occurs in youth differs in many respects from that which occurs in the adult. The main differences are the systemic toxicity that occurs in children and the tendency for fewer joints to be involved. The juvenile variety is frequently difficult to differentiate from other childhood diseases, especially rheumatic fever. It is the most common arthritis affecting children and is often called “chronic arthritis of children.”

CLINICAL FEATURES

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is usually one of three types: (1) systemic (20%), (2) pauciarticular (30%), or (3) polyarticular (50%). Systemic or acute febrile juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is characterized by extraarticular manifestations, especially high spiking fevers and a typical rash. The rash frequently appears in the evening and may be elicited by gently scratching the skin in susceptible areas (Koebner’s phenomenon). Splenomegaly, generalized lymphadenopathy, pericarditis, and myocarditis may also occur. The articular findings are often minimal and usually are overshadowed by the systemic symptoms. The morbidity from this form is usually from chronic arthritis, however.

The pauciarticular or oligoarticular form usually involves the larger joints, such as the knees, elbows, and ankles. Girls are affected four times more often than boys. Systemic features are often minimal, and only one to three joints are usually involved. The joint disease rarely causes impairment, but iridocyclitis develops in approximately 30% of cases with this form, and permanent loss of vision develops in a high percentage of these patients. Frequent ocular examinations, early detection, and treatment are therefore indicated. In this form of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, accelerated growth of the affected limb from chronic hyperemia may result in a temporary leg length discrepancy that is eventually equalized in most cases on control of the inflammation.

Polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis resembles the adult rheumatoid disease in its symmetric involvement of the small joints of the hands and feet. The knees and wrists may also be involved, and this form in more common in girls. Cervical spine involvement is not uncommon and may produce marked restriction of motion. Early closure of the ossification centers of the mandible may produce a markedly receding chin, a characteristic of this form. Systemic manifestations are similar to the febrile variety but are not as dramatic. Children who develop the disease in adolescence are often seropositive and manifest symptoms and signs similar to adult rheumatoid arthritis.

The roentgenographic findings in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis are the same as those in the adult, except that joint destruction is less frequent (Fig. 14-6). The laboratory findings are also similar, except that the peripheral WBC count may be very high and the rheumatoid factor is rarely demonstrable in the serum of children.

Neuroarthropathy

The neuropathic or Charcot’s joint is one that results from a disturbance in the sensation to the joint. An underlying neurologic disorder must always be present. Diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy is the most common cause (5% of diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy develop a neuropathic foot). Other causes are tabes dorsalis, Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, and syringomyelia. The most widely accepted theory on the etiology is the “neurotraumatic” theory in which the impairment and loss of joint sensation decrease the protective mechanisms about the joint. This leads to rapid destruction. Chronic inflammation and repetitive effusions develop, which further contribute to instability and incongruity of joints, usually the weight-bearing ones.

CLINICAL FEATURES

The foot is usually involved in diabetes, the shoulder and elbow joint in syringomyelia, and the vertebrae and lower extremities in tabes dorsalis (Fig. 14-7). Gradual enlargement and instability of the affected joint are common complaints. Pain is usually present but tends to be relatively mild when compared with the severity of the joint destruction.

The examination is characterized by swelling and hypermobility. Palpation frequently reveals gross deformity of bone and joint and crepitus. Early involvement of the foot because of diabetes is first manifest by painless swelling at the apex of the arch. As weight bearing continues, there is collapse of the arch with frank dislocation and deformity of the mid-foot. Eventually, the arch completely disintegrates, and a reverse arch or rockerbottom foot is formed (Fig. 14-8). There is commonly skin breakdown and ulcer formation where the dislocation has occurred.

Variable degrees of joint destruction and disintegration with exuberant osteophyte formation are usually present on roentgenographic examination. Later, subluxation and deformity may be seen (Fig. 14-9).

In questionable cases, sepsis may need to be ruled out by aspiration, sometimes with biopsy. Usually, 2 to 3 hours of elevation relieves the redness of neuropathy but not sepsis. In addition, the patient with infection usually feels sick, but systemic signs are usually absent in the Charcot foot.

Polymyalgia Rheumatica

This is a very common disorder of unknown cause affecting older adults. It is characterized by chronic inflammation that causes stiffness and aching of the shoulder and hip regions. It is sometimes called “anarthritic rheumatoid syndrome.” The diagnosis is often difficult to make because there are no uniform diagnostic criteria for the disorder. There is a strong relationship of polymyalgia rheumatica to temporal (giant cell) arteritis, the two disorders being perhaps different phases of the same disease process.

CLINICAL FEATURES

The condition is rare before the age of 50, with an average age of 70 years at onset. Females are affected twice as often as males. Symptoms are frequently of sudden onset but have often been present for months before the diagnosis is made. Neck, shoulder, low back, and thigh pain are common complaints. Morning stiffness, lasting 2 to 3 hours, is typical, and patients often have difficulty getting out of bed. Malaise, depression, weight loss, and a low-grade fever are common constitutional symptoms and may suggest a systemic inflammation. Shoulder pain is the presenting symptom in the majority of cases and is typically bilateral.

Physical findings are usually limited. Some restriction of shoulder motion may be present. Synovitis may be present in peripheral joints and may also be responsible for the proximal girdle symptoms despite the fact that they appear to be “muscular” in origin. Patients may have difficulty raising their shoulders overhead. Hip range of motion may also be limited. Mild soft tissue tenderness may be present. The temporal arteries should be carefully examined because of the strong relation of polymyalgia rheumatica with temporal or giant cell arteritis.

Laboratory findings are usually normal, except for a typically elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) over 45. C-reactive protein levels are also sensitive to the disease. A mild anemia may be present. Muscle biopsies are always normal. Synovial biopsy may show mild inflammation. Some patients have a vasculitis similar to that seen in giant cell arteritis, one of the several manifestations that the two disorders have in common. (Giant cell arteritis may rarely present as a medical emergency with headache and variable degrees of blindness.) Any patient with cranial signs or symptoms should have a temporal artery biopsy.

Fibromyalgia

This is a controversial clinical syndrome characterized by multiple trigger points and chronic (more than 3 months) diffuse pain (Fig. 14-10). Similar disorders have been called fibrositis, myofascial pain syndrome, and psychogenic rheumatism. The disorder is common, affecting as 2% to 3% of the general population.

Some physicians doubt the existence of such syndromes, partly because the patients often seem anxious and depressed. No pathologic inflammatory changes have ever been demonstrated. The diagnosis is often used in patients with vague aching near joints, especially the spine, shoulder, and hip girdles, for which no other obvious cause can be found. Other overlapping comorbid conditions, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, headaches, and irritable bowel syndrome, are common in these patients.

Lyme Arthritis

Lyme disease is a multisystem disorder caused by a spirochetal infection (Borrelia burgdorferi) transmitted by deer ticks (Ixodes scapularis in the northeast, I. pacificus in the west). It is most common in the northeast (where it is endemic) but has been found in numerous areas of the country. The greatest exposure is between the months of May and November. Diagnosis can be difficult because a multitude of symptoms may develop that mimic many other conditions. It is characterized in its early stages by flu-like symptoms (fever, myalgia, headache) and a typical skin rash, erythema migrans, which often occurs at the site of the tick bite. The early stage may last up to 30 days and be accompanied by arthralgias. Weeks to months later, recurrent skin lesions and neurologic and cardiac abnormalities may develop, along with intermittent bouts of arthritis.

Joint involvement is the most common late complication and occurs in more than half of the cases. The onset occurs at a median of 6 months after the skin lesion of erythema migrans. Usually, fewer than two or three joints are involved, and the knee is almost always affected. Other large joints may be involved, but small joint involvement is unusual. Five percent to 10% of patients may develop chronic arthritis, most commonly involving the knees. Effusions are typical, and erosion with cartilage destruction may even occur. Exacerbations and remissions are common. Arthritic symptoms last for about 1 week, and recurrences are common for years.

Serologic testing is available but not always reliable, especially in early Lyme disease. (Testing only detects the antibodies to the organism, so patients who may have had prior exposure but do not have active disease would still test positive.) Most patients with arthritis are seropositive, however, and any patient with unexplained oligoarthritis or monoarthritis should be tested, especially if the knee is involved. A negative test virtually rules out Lyme arthritis. Polymerase chain reaction testing of the joint fluid can be performed to confirm the diagnosis. The diagnosis must often be made on protean clinical findings, and not on the basis of a single laboratory test.

Mixed Connective Tissue Disease

This is a term used to describe a set of symptoms of connective tissue nature which sometimes overlap with other known connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, progressive systemic sclerosis, and polymyositis. Whether or not these symptoms make up a distinct, separate clinical entity remains under debate. The disorder is sometimes referred to as an “overlap syndrome,” but many prefer the term “undifferentiated connective tissue disease.” Initially, it was thought to be a mild variant of systemic lupus erythematosus, sometimes called “benign lupus.”

Antiinflammatory Medication

NSAIDs are among the most commonly used medications for their anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. For some time, only aspirin was available, but over the years, many NSAIDs have been developed that have largely replaced salicylates. Some (ibuprofen, naporoxen) are even available without a prescription. The mode of action of these drugs is not completely understood, but they probably act to suppress the synthesis of proinflammatory agents called prostaglandins by blocking the action of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an enzyme important in their production. Unfortunately, most of the agents also inhibit the production of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), an agent necessary in the production of beneficial prostaglandins. Suppression of COX-1 function in the stomach is thought to cause many of the side effects of traditional NSAIDs, including GI bleeding. The new COX-2 inhibitors are useful alternatives for the patient who cannot tolerate the usual NSAIDs. They allow the production of homeostatic prostaglandins, especially those in the stomach. Unfortunately, they are no better than other NSAIDs for symptom relief, and they are very expensive. This is a special concern, because the older population on a fixed income is most prone to the conditions and side effects for which these drugs might be beneficial.

Salicylates are effective, inexpensive, and generally well tolerated. If stomach intolerance is a problem, enteric-coated or buffered products are available that may lessen the gastric distress. One minor disadvantage of aspirin as compared with other NSAIDs is the frequent dosing regimen, although most of the prescription salicylates have more convenient dosing schedules. If salicylates or other over-the-counter medications are ineffective, inconvenient, or not well tolerated, a number of prescription drugs may be tried (Table 14-4). None of these seems clearly superior to the others, and as a general class, NSAIDs are thought by some investigators to be no better than even simple analgesics, at least in the treatment of osteoarthritis for which they are commonly recommended. (If only the analgesic effect is needed, plain acetaminophen may be better because of its safety profile, especially for osteoarthritis, in which inflammation plays less of a role.) These drugs are categorized into several classes, and when switching from one to another, it is best to select from a different class. Patients must also be reminded that all of these drugs are most effective for chronic pain when taken routinely. Although some therapeutic effect of these drugs usually begins in a few hours, the maximum benefit may require 1 to 2 weeks. However, if the pain is mild, some are effective taken as simple analgesics on an “as needed” basis. It is important to remember that prescription NSAIDs are expensive and should not be used casually. Also, combining one NSAID with another should not be done.

Table 14-4 Frequently Used NSAIDs

NSAID Usual Dose Comments
Salicylates    
Acetylated    
Aspirin 3000 mg/day Give in divided doses after food consumption
Non-acetylated    
Dilflunisal (Dolobid) 500 mg BID May cause marrow depression
Choline magnesium trisalicylate (Trilisate), salicylsalicylic acid (Disalcid, Mono-Gesic) 3000 mg/day Less toxic, less effective?
Acetic acids   These may cause the most serious CNS side effects, which may limit their use (headache, depression, etc.)
Sulindac (Clinoril) 150–200 mg BID  
Indomethacin (Indocin) 25–50 mg BID Available in TR capsule; worst SE profile
Tolmetin (Tolectin) 600 mg TID  
Diclofenac (Voltaren) 50 mg TID Available in SR form
Proprionic acids   Use carefully in patients with renal dysfunction.
Ibuprofen (Motrin, etc.) 600–800 mg TID  
Fenoprofen (Nalfon) 600 mg TID  
Ketoprofen (Orudis) 75 mg TID  
Flurbiprofen (Ansaid) 100 mg BID  
Naproxen (Naprosyn) 500 mg BID Available over the counter and in SR form
Oxaprozin (Daypro) 1200 mg/d Once daily dosing
Others    
Meloxicam (Mobic) 7.5–15 mg/d Can take without regard to food
Etodolac (Lodine) 400 mg BID  
Nabumetone (Relafen) 500 mg BID Less GI toxicity
Piroxicam (Feldene) 10–20 mg/day Occasional photosensitivity
Meclofenamate (Meclomen) 100 mg TID Less hepatoxic; diarrhea common

* Diclofenac and sulindac have the greatest potential for hepatotoxicity. Proprionic acids occasionally can cause photosensitivity. The following side effects are common to most NSAIDs: (1) gastric irritation, (2) interference with platelet function, (3) salt and water retention, and (4) visual disturbances. These drugs should not be used in combination. When changing drugs, change from one class to a separate class. Aspirin, the most commonly used NSAID, is also available under the trade name of Zorprin. This drug is released in the small intestine rather than the stomach. The usual dose is two 800-mg tablets twice a day.

NOTE: Most of the popular NSAIDs are becoming available in SR forms, often with less GI toxicity. Celocoxib, the COX-2 inhibitor, is usually prescribed in doses of 100–200 mg once or twice each day.

CNS, Central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal; SE, side effects; SR, sustained release; TR, time-release.

USES

The benefits of this class of drugs to patients with inflammatory joint diseases are enormous. They are front-line medications in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, gout, and the spondyloarthropathies. In these diseases, they offer not only pain relief but the ability to actually alter the progression of the disease process. They are also used for a wide variety of other conditions, most of them associated with pain, such as tendinitis, osteoarthritis, and degenerative disc disease. And though the diagnostic terms commonly used for these disorders would imply inflammation, concepts regarding the underlying pathology of these latter conditions continue to evolve. The idea that chronic inflammation is the cause of them is being questioned because more precise information has become available that shows very little inflammatory reaction on histologic examination. Tendinitis, for example, may begin as overuse, leading to inflammation, but chronic pain is more often associated with neovascular changes in the local tissue without typical cellular findings of inflammation. Even the terminology used to describe these disorders is changing (from tendinitis to tendinosis or tendinopathy). Some studies suggest that they are beneficial, and some report no effect. Unfortunately, the outcomes that are measured, such as pain, are based mainly on subjective data, which may be influenced by the analgesic properties of these medications. Whether or not these drugs are appropriate for these disorders is a question that remains unanswered.

NSAIDs have also been recommended in the treatment of acute ligament and muscle injuries. It was thought that suppressing the local inflammation could allow for faster recovery. The use of antiprostaglandins under these circumstances has been the source of considerable debate, mainly because prostaglandins play important roles in the normal healing process, and NSAIDs could actually block rather than enhance the healing of these injuries. Results at this time are inconclusive. NSAIDs may be helpful in some ways, such as restoring circulation, but may have negative effects on other aspects of the soft tissue healing response.

SIDE EFFECTS

Because of their common mechanism of activity, many of these agents have similar side effects. Most of them are reversible when the drug therapy is discontinued. Although most physicians consider them to be safe, more than 16,500 deaths occur each year as a result of anti-inflammatory drug use.

Gastrointestinal

Gastric irritation is common to all of these drugs, and the elderly patients who need them the most have three times more GI side effects than those younger than age 60. In most cases, the discomfort can be minimized by giving the drug with food. Ulcers that may develop are usually gastric rather than duodenal. As many as 60% of patients taking NSAIDs will develop gastric erosions. Many are asymptomatic. Because prostaglandins normally protect the gastric mucosa, injury appears to be caused by the inhibition of prostaglandin production. Erosions also may be caused by some direct local irritative effect. Although these drugs may have detrimental GI side effects, they are all that is available for the treatment of many inflammatory conditions. For those patients at greater risk of gastric ulceration (elderly or with a past history of ulcer disease), the COX-2 inhibitors are appropriate. Misoprostol (Cytotec) may also be helpful. An analogue of prostaglandin, misoprostol is effective in the prevention of gastric (not duodenal) ulcers caused by NSAIDs. It is recommended for use in those patients more likely to develop ulceration: (1) older (over 60 years) or debilitated patients, (2) those with a known ulceration or previous GI bleed, or (3) patients taking oral steroids. Cotreatment with misoprostol (200 mg four times a day) has been shown to be effective during NSAID use. However, not everyone taking NSAIDs should be treated with them, because the cost of the two drugs together would be prohibitive. Misoprostol also can cause diarrhea and is contraindicated during pregnancy (it may cause spontaneous abortion) and nursing. Other drugs such as H2 antagonists and antacids produced inferior results to misoprostol in preventing gastric ulceration, although even their use is often recommended on an empiric basis in patients at high risk.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aegerter E, Kirkpatrick JA. Orthopedic diseases, ed 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1968.

Agudelo CA, Wise CM. Crystal-associated arthritis in the elderly. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26:527-546.

Agudelo CA, Wise CM. Gout: Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:234-239.

Alexander CJ. Osteoarthritis: A review of old myths and current concepts. Skeletal Radiol. 1990;19:327-333.

Allison MC, Howatson AG, Torrance CJ, et al. Gastrointestinal damage associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1992;237:749-754.

Alpert SW, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Neuropathic arthropathy: Review of current knowledge. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:100-108.

Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315-324.

Bahlas S, Ramos-Remus C, Davis P. Clinical outcome of 149 patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:99-104.

Bondeson J, Maini RN. Tumour necrosis factor as a therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases: The clinical experience with infliximab (REMICADE). Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55:211-216.

Brander VA. Osteoarthritis of the knee: Pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and radiographic progression. Am J Orthop. 2001;30:6.

Brown KM, Saunders MM, Kirsch T, et al. Effect of COX-2-specific inhibition on fracture-healing in the rat femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-A:116-123.

Bjelle A, Sunden G. Pyrophosphate arthropathy: A clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1974;56:246-255.

Bloom BS. Risk and cost of gastrointestinal side effects associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1019-1022.

Buckwalter JA, Stanish WD, Rosier RN, et al. The increasing need for nonoperative treatment of patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:36-45.

Canhao H, Fonseca JE, Leandro MJ, et al. Cross-sectional study of 50 patients with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal arthropathy. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20:119-122.

Casey AT, Crockard HA, Pringle J, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine: Current techniques for management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:291-309.

Chan AT, Wordsworth BP, McNally J. Overlap connective tissue disease, pulmonary fibrosis and extensive subcutaneous calcification. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:690-691.

Chard J, Dieppe P. Glucosamine for osteoarthritis: Magic, hype, or confusion? It’s probably safe—but there’s no good evidence that it works. BMJ. 2001;322:1439-1440.

Choy EH, Panayi GS. Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:907-916.

Chuang TY, Hunder GG, Ilstrup DM, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica: A 10-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:672-680.

Cohen MD, Abril A. Polymyalgia rheumatica revisited. Bull Rheum Dis. 2001;50:1-4.

Crofford LJ. Pharmaceutical treatment options for fibromyalgia. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2004;6:274-280.

Cuckler JM. Alternative therapies for arthritis of the knee: A triumph of hope over reason? Orthopedics. 2000;23:975-976.

Dahners LE, Mullis BH. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone formation and soft-tissue healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:139-143.

Edmonds JP, Scott DL, Furst DE, et al. Antirheumatic drugs: A proposed new classification. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:336-339.

Edwards JC, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, et al. Efficacy of B-cell–targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2572-2581.

Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Hyaluronate sodium injections for osteoarthritis: The truth. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2498-2499.

Flatt AE. The care of the rheumatoid hand, ed 2. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1968.

Gardner GC, Kadel NJ. Ordering and interpreting rheumatologic laboratory tests. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:60-67.

Gatter RA. A practical handbook of joint fluid analysis. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1984.

Gerstenfeld LC, Thiede M, Seibert K, et al. Differential inhibition of fracture healing by non-selective and cyclooxygenase-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:670-675.

Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Bordel R, et al. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition reverses microcirculatory and inflammatory sequelae of closed soft-tissue trauma in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:153-160.

Glueck D, Gellman H. Management of the upper extremity in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:254-266.

Graham DY. Prevention of gastroduodenal injury induced by chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(2 Pt 2 Suppl):675-681.

Graves M, Tarquinio TA. Diabetic neuroarthropathy (Charcot joints): The importance of recognizing chronic sensory deficits in the treatment of acute foot and ankle fractures in diabetic patients. Orthopedics. 2003;26:415-418.

Gutman AB. Views on the pathogenesis and management of primary gout—1971. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:357-372.

Guyton GP, Saltzman CL. The diabetic foot: Basic mechanisms of disease. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:169-181.

Halverson PB, Derfus BA. Calcium crystal-induced inflammation. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:221-224.

Hamilton J, Capell H. The treatment of juvenile arthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2001;2:1085-1092.

Harris C. Osteoarthritis: How to diagnose and treat the painful joint. Geriatrics. 1993;48:39-40. 42–46

Harris ED. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis for now and the future. Kelly WN, Harris ED, Ruddy S, et al, editors. Textbook of rheumatology. 1995. (Update 18) New York,

Hartofilakidis G, Karachalios T. Idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip: Incidence, classification, and natural history of 272 cases. Orthopedics. 2003;26:161-166.

Helliwell PS. Relationship of psoriatic arthritis with the other spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:344-349.

Hohler T, Marker-Hermann E. Psoriatic arthritis: Clinical aspects, genetics, and the role of T cells. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:273-279.

ed 8. Hollander JL, McCarty DJ, editors. Arthritis and allied conditions. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1972.

Hunder GG. The use and misuse of classification and diagnostic criteria for complex diseases. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:417-418.

Hunder GG. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. In: Kelley WN, Harris ED, Ruddy S, et al, editors. Textbook of rheumatology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1996. Update 20

Jaffe HL. Metabolic, degenerative, and inflammatory diseases of bones and joints. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1972.

Johnson CJ, Reilly KM, Murray KM. Etanercept in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:464-471.

Katz WA. Rheumatoid diseases, diagnosis, and management. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1977.

Kallenberg CG. Overlapping syndromes, undifferentiated connective tissue disease and other fibrosing conditions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1993;5:809-815.

Kelly MA, Goldberg VM, Healy WL, et al. Osteoarthritis and beyond: A consensus on the past, present, and future of hyaluronans in orthopedics. Orthopedics. 2003;26:1064-1079.

King BGJr, Evans EB. Palindromic rheumatism: An unusual cause of the inflammatory joint. Two case reports and a review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:142-144.

Kline NS. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. IV. JAMA. 1964;190:741-751.

Kremer JM. Rational use of new and existing disease-modifying agents in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:695-706.

Lane JM. Anti-inflammatory medications: Selective COX-2 inhibitors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:75-78.

Laskar FH, Sargison KD. Ochronotic arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52:653-666.

Laurin CA, Desmarchais J, Daziano L, et al. Long-term results of synovectomy of the knee in rheumatoid patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:521-531.

Lawrence SJ. Lyme disease: An orthopedic perspective. Orthopedics. 1992;15:1331-1342.

Leopold SS, Redd BB, Warme WJ, et al. Corticosteroid compared with hyaluronic acid injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-A:1197-1203.

Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1594-1602.

Li-Yu 2001 Li-Yu J, Clayburne G, Sieck M, et al. Treatment of chronic gout. Can we determine when urate stores are depleted enough to prevent attacks of gout? J Rheumatol. 2001;28:577-580.

Loeb DS, Ahlquist DA, Talley NJ. Management of gastroduodenopathy associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67:354-364.

Lopez-Longo 2001 Lopez-Longo FJ, et al. Does mixed connective disease have a less favorable prognosis than systemic lupus erythematosis? Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(suppl):119.

Maini SR. Infliximab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2004;30:329-347.

Mandell BF. Polymyalgia rheumatica: Clinical presentation is key to diagnosis and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71:489-495.

McDonald JC, Milgrom F, Witebsky E. Primer of the rheumatic diseases. I. JAMA. 1964;190:127-140.

McLaughlin TP, Zemel L, Fisher RL, et al. Chronic arthritis of the knee in Lyme disease. Review of the literature and report of two cases treated by synovectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1057-1061.

Moghtaderi S, Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD. Ochronotic arthropathy: A report of 3 cases. Am J Orthop. 2005;34:136-139.

Murray DG. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. 3. JAMA. 1964;190:509-530.

Myerson MS, Edwards WH. Management of neuropathic fractures in the foot and ankle. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:8-18.

Nozawa S, Miyamoto K, Nishimoto H, et al. Charcot joint in the elbow associated with syringomyelia. Orthopedics. 2003;26:731-732.

Olsen NJ, Stein CM. New drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2167-2179.

Pakarinen TK, Laine HJ, Honkonen SE, et al. Charcot arthropathy of the diabetic foot. Current concepts and review of 36 cases. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:195-201.

Pavelka K, Gatterova J, Olejarova M, et al. Glucosamine sulfate use and delay of progression of knee osteoarthritis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2113-2123.

Pinzur MS, Evans A. Health-related quality of life in patients with Charcot foot. Am J Orthop. 2003;32:492-496.

Pinzur MS, Shields N, Trepman E, et al. Current practice patterns in the treatment of Charcot foot. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:916.

Ravelli A, Martini A. Early predictors of outcome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21(5 Suppl 31):S89-S93.

Raynauld JP, Buckland-Wright C, Ward R, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term intraarticular steroid injections in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:370-377.

Reiff AO. Developments in the treatment of juvenile arthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004;5:1485-1496.

Reynolds JC. Famotidine therapy for active duodenal ulcers. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:7-14.

Richy F, Bruyere O, Ethgen O, et al. Structural and symptomatic efficacy of glucosamine and chondroitin in knee osteoarthritis: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1514-1522.

Riedel AA, Nelson M, Joseph-Ridge N, et al. Compliance with allopurinol therapy among managed care enrollees with gout: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1575-1581.

Robinson RL, Birnbaum HG, Morley MA, et al. Depression and fibromyalgia: Treatment and cost when diagnosed separately or concurrently. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1621-1629.

Rosenthal AK. Crystal arthropathies and other unpopular rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:262.

Roubenoff R. Gout and hyperuricemia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990;16:539-550.

Sagarin MJ. Pseudogout. J Emerg Med. 2000;18:373-374.

Salvarani C, Cantini F, Boiardi L, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:261-271.

Schlesinger N, Schumacher HRJr. Gout: Can management be improved? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13:240-244.

Scott WN, Clarke HD. Early knee arthritis. The role of arthroscopy: Beneficial or placebo? Orthopedics. 2003;26:943-944.

Sigal LH. Pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:195-204.

Simmons BP, Nutting JT, Bernstein RA. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Clin. 1996;12:573-589.

Simon LS, Smolen JS, Abramson SB, et al. Controversies in COX-2 selective inhibition. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1501-1510.

Smith JB, Haynes MK. Rheumatoid arthritis—a molecular understanding. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:908-922.

Steere AC, Taylor E, McHugh GL, et al. The overdiagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA. 1993;269:1812-1816.

Steere AC, Green J, Schoen RT, et al. Successful parenteral penicillin therapy of established Lyme arthritis. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:869-874.

Tamblyn R, Berkson L, Dauphinee WD, et al. Unnecessary prescribing of NSAIDs and the management of NSAID-related gastropathy in medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:429-438.

Terkeltaub RA. Clinical practice. Gout. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1647-1655.

Thaller J, Walker M, Kline AJ, et al. The effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on spinal fusion. Orthopedics. 2005;28:299-303.

van Everdingen AA, Jacobs JW, Siewertsz Van Reesema DR, et al. Low-dose prednisone therapy for patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical efficacy, disease-modifying properties, and side effects: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:1-12.

Velilla-Moliner 2004 Velilla-Moliner J, Martinez-Burgui JA, Cobeta-Garca JC, et al. Podagra, is it always gout? Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22:320-321.

Wallace SL, Singer JZ. Therapy in gout. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1988;14:441-457.

Wallace KL, Riedel AA, Joseph-Ridge N, et al. Increasing prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia over 10 years among older adults in a managed care population. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1582-1587.

Wang CT, Lin J, Chang CJ, et al. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid on osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:538-545.

Wegman A, van der Windt D, van Tulder M, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or acetominophen for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee? A systematic review of evidence and guidelines. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:344-354.

Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:160-172.

Wormser GP, Ramanathan R, Nowakowski J, et al. Duration of antibiotic therapy for early Lyme disease. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:697-704.