Teaching and learning in the clinical context

Published on 01/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2556 times

24 Teaching and learning in the clinical context

Changing perceptions of clinical teaching

Clinical teaching should be at the heart of medical education but how it is delivered is sadly often ignored. Traditionally the training of a doctor was based on the apprenticeship model where the trainee was attached to a reputable physician and worked with the physician in the day-to-day care of patients. This approach provided a relevant and practical training but had two disadvantages. There was a perceived lack of scientific underpinning of

the education and the quality of the training varied with the trainer’s capacity and conscientiousness. For these reasons, as described earlier in the book, in the early part of the twentieth century training was moved to medical schools and associated with a defined curriculum. A greater emphasis was put on the scientific basis for medicine and this played a key role in the early training of a doctor and lectures were widely adopted. In the past two decades there has been a move to return an emphasis in training to the clinical context, with the provision of authentic learning experiences from the early years of the undergraduate curriculum. Changes have also taken place in postgraduate education with the recognition that the education of the trainee does not need to conflict with his or her service role in the delivery of health care. With an appropriate curriculum and planning, learning can be managed ’on the job’ in the context of the trainee’s work.

The student

Key players in clinical teaching are the student, the teacher and the patient. The role of the student in the clinical setting varies depending on their seniority and their stage in the curriculum. A junior student may actively engage in learning while not being a member of the team delivering the patient’s care. Students may visit the ward in groups of six to ten and be taught on one or more selected patients by an assigned clinical teacher. Students observe the teacher taking a patient’s history or examining the patient and may have the opportunity to do so themselves. The students are then questioned on the findings and required to reflect on the patient’s case. Feedback is given to the student.

A more senior student participates in a clerkship as a member of the healthcare team. The teaching is integrated into the care of the patient. Students move from a peripheral role to one of participating as members of the medical community of practice. Students learn from working alongside experienced practitioners and other members of the healthcare team. In the process they are socialised into the practice of medicine. The ward round and patient care conferences are typical learning opportunities.

In postgraduate training, work-based learning is the norm with the trainees developing their competencies as junior members of the healthcare team with certain assigned responsibilities. Short courses relating to specialised aspects of the work or procedures can be scheduled

The teacher

The role of the clinical teacher is particularly challenging as it encompasses the range of roles highlighted in Chapter 1. These include information provider, role model, facilitator, mentor, assessor and planner. Clinical teachers assume multiple roles when they interact with their students. They need to be ’the expert’ and a source of knowledge while at the same time facilitating the students’ learning by having an understanding about the teaching and learning process. Both senior and junior doctors serve as role models for students. Many studies have explored the attributes of a good clinical teacher and these are summarised in Table 24.1.

Table 24.1 Features of the good clinical teacher

Good clinical teacher Bad clinical teacher
Plans the clinical teaching with clearly defined learning outcomes Haphazard approach with no clear plan
Appears enthusiastic with a positive attitude Disinterested and regards the teaching as an intrusion into other commitments
Serves as a positive role model demonstrating good relationships with patients Serves as a poor role model lacking aspects of professionalism in practice
Helpful and available to students Intimidating and teaches by humiliation
Encourages student active participation Didactic with student’s role passive
Patient-orientated with problem solving Disease-orientated and factual
Observes student examining patient and provides feedback Listens to or reads students’ reports of examination of patient and provides inadequate feedback
Provides students with opportunity to practise their skills Does not encourage students to practise their skills
Tailors the teaching to the stage of training of the students and to the needs of the individual students Does not take into consideration the stage of training of the students or their individual needs

The skills required of a clinical teacher too often have been taken for granted and it has been assumed that if doctors are good practitioners, they are also good teachers. Unfortunately deficiencies and poor practice in clinical teaching have been widely recognised. Problems identified include the lack of planning, inappropriate supervision, lack of feedback and failure to appreciate basic educational principles as to how students learn.

Implementing

In a formal clinical teaching session students should be actively involved and engaged. They should feel free to ask questions and ask for help if required. They should be encouraged to reflect and think about the patients they see. Students can be helped to do this by the use of skilful questioning by the teacher, the aim of which includes:

As a teacher you need to learn to be comfortable with silence. Give the students at least three to five seconds to think between asking a question and expecting an answer. Insufficient attention is paid to the art of questioning in staff development programmes. We have found the skill lacking even in experienced teachers.

As well as questioning the learner, it is important for the teacher also to be a good listener. You need to hear and understand what is being said and respond accordingly. Non-verbal behaviours are also important so try to maintain eye contact with the student.

In clinical teaching the provision of feedback to the learner is of particular importance. Feedback is an essential part of the learning process. It provides students and trainees with information about their performance and how they can improve upon it. It needs to be given skilfully if you want to motivate your students. The feedback should be timely, descriptive rather than evaluative, and specific rather than general. Try to provide positive suggestions and not just negative comments. This is discussed further in Chapter 2.